Fyodor Dostoyevsky once wrote, “avoid fear, though fear is simply the consequence of every lie.” You must face your fears, otherwise they will hold you back from reaching your dreams.

Its easy to take liberty for granted when you have never had it taken away from you

My IRISH blood of my father runs through my veins as I quote – Patrick Pearse “You cannot conquer Ireland. You cannot extinguish the Irish passion for freedom. If our deed has not been sufficient to win freedom, then our children will win by a better deed.” May I add, you cannot conquer New Zealand, you cannot extinguish New Zealanders passion for freedom. The number 8 fence wire kicks in.

Groundswell NZs requested a meeting with Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern but it had been declined. The group held its ‘Howl of A Protest’ in July, and it estimated 60,000 people drove tractors, trucks and utes down main streets in more than 50 locations throughout the country. On Sunday November 21st 2021 farmers nationwide are again protesting. I pray that millions of people country-wide support them.

The World Economic Forum and the United Nations signed an official partnersip on June 13th 2019 prior to COVID19. This is a global public / private one world corporate governance. A preplanned action to accelerated UN Agenda 2030’s 17 sustainable global development goals, to leave no-one behind.
17 out of 17 goals relate to Climate Alarmism. Replacing livestock with crops, lab manufactured meat, foods and even the talk of cricket farms..the lunacy continues, consequently te farmers are suffering as this insanity insist and persists.

14 of the UN/WEF global development goals relate to vaccines (UN global strategy of vaccines 2011-2010) Leave no-one behhind.. everyone, everywhere at every age. 2020- 2030 The Decade Of Vaccines, leave no-one beind, everyone, everywhere at every age.

Climate Alarmism and the global strateggy of vaccines to leave no-one behind are tools of fear to take total control of every being, human or not on this planet.

WEF – The World Economic Forum represents Big Pharma, Big Tech, Bayer-Monsanto etc., and multistakerholder greedy capitalist corporations. NZ Goverment has welcomed this and promoted it. This is the destruction not only of small businesses and traditional farming in New Zealand but \it amount to slavery and tyranny on a ggrand scale that affects everyones life. Ardern in hher VPN to the UN in September 2019 has boasted shhe as entered UN Agenda 2030 into NZ Policies. That she indeed will lead the world, be the first, show other UN Nations the way. New Zealanders are livin in very dangerous times.

The government keep on lying, suicides are increasing especially amongst the farming community and the construction industry.

Whoever conrols the land, controls the people, controls the country and controls the planet.. we the people are but just human capital, like lambs are you prepared to go to the slaughter.

NZ Farmers are the backbone of New Zealand. I urge you to get out, protest cupport the farmers on sunday November 21st 2021. The Mother of ALL Protests Nationwide.

Please find a list of support links for those who feel they are not coping with this mental, emotional stress:-
Need help now? Call 0800 111 315 MATES in Construction

Home

Rural Support Trust Helpline: 0800 787 254 –

Farmstrong https://farmstrong.co.nz/

Rural Support Network 0800 787 254

24/7 Helpline |0800 LIFELINE (0800 54 33 54) or free text HELP (4357)
Suicide Crisis Helpline | 0508 TAUTOKO (0508 82 88 65)

Brendon Smith
Phone:(09) 525 1690 Mobile: 021892980
Email:auckland@fatherandchild.org.nz

24/7 Helpline |0800 LIFELINE (0800 54 33 54) or free text HELP
(4357)

Suicide Crisis Helpline | 0508 TAUTOKO (0508 82 88 65)

Life Matters contact@lifematters.org.nz

Youth Line 0800 376 633. Free Text 234

MAN ALIVE 0800 826 367

NOTE: PLEASE CLICK ON THE ARROW ABOVE TO TAKE YOU TO FURTHER INFORMATION ON MY RUMBLE VIDEO
(If you have not signed up to my website please sign up now and share my website link with your friends, family..thank you )

(NASA)
POSTED BY: DR. TIM BALL
JUNE 15, 2017

Please Share This Story!

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor
President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science.

I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.

The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

[the_ad id=”11018″]
The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda

After five days with him at the UN she concluded:-
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.
He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.

“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.
It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

REFERENCE TO NEWS REPORT RNZ 10/11/2021……The police are using, titled ‘Consent to Assume Online Internet Identity’.
The form asks people to sign away their social media and email accounts, allowing the police to “take control of and use my internet online identities”. The Law Society and legal entities are awaiting a response from the Police Commissioner- Andrew Coster

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 17
Your right to freedom of association includes the right to form any type of organisation, and to associate with any other individual or organisation. When combined with freedom of expression it also includes the right to advertise that you are doing these activities.

SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING OF ACTIVISTS BY THE STATE
Being watched and monitored by the police and government

When is “surveillance” legal?
There are two different types of surveillance:
• surveillance that doesn’t require any special power to carry out because it is within the normal scope of a citizen’s rights and powers, and
• surveillance that requires special permission (like a court warrant) because otherwise it’s against the law.

Anyone can carry out the first kind of surveillance. We can follow someone to see where they go or find out where they live, we can observe who they visit or we can listen in when someone on the bus is talking on their phone. So long as we don’t interfere with someone’s rights (for example, their right to privacy) or otherwise break the law, those actions would be legal.

So what surveillance powers do police have generally?
Search and Surveillance Act 2012, s 46

Police do have some general surveillance powers that don’t require a court warrant.
They can:-
• watch and monitor you without a surveillance device so long as it doesn’t involve trespass (using a surveillance device would include things like watching you with a zoom lens, bugging your phone, or using a tracking device on your car)

• carry out visual surveillance of people and activity in public places (like streets and parks), even with a device used to improve vision, like a zoom lens.

Gathering and protesting with others: The right to freedom of peaceful assembly
(New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 16;)

Your right to freedom of peaceful assembly means you can gather in a group, so long as this isn’t for a violent purpose, like rioting, and you’re not disturbing the peace. It includes the right to plan and to invite people to the gathering.
Your right to peaceful assembly doesn’t include the right to infringe on other people’s freedom of movement by preventing them from using a road.

Here are some other potential limitations on the right to peaceful assembly:

Can the police spy on me while I’m at home, like using binoculars to look through my window?
(Search and Surveillance Act 2012, s 46)
If they don’t have a court warrant, they’re not allowed to use binoculars, a telescope, a camera with a zoom lens, or any other device that provides better than normal vision, to watch you when you’re inside your house or flat – so looking through your window would be outside their powers.
The law is different if the police are observing you while you’re outside in your back yard or anywhere else in your section – what the law calls the “curtilage” of your place, which means the immediate surroundings of the main building of your house or flat but within the boundaries of your property. If you’re anywhere in those immediate surroundings then the police can use binoculars or zoom lenses or other visual devices to watch you for up to three hours in any 24-hour period, or up to eight hours in total, for any single investigation or series of connected investigations.

Example: Surveillance of activists and the community
During 2006–2007, the police carried out a nationwide investigation of activists who were alleged to be involved in planning acts of political violence. While 20 people were arrested and charged with a range of offences, primarily firearms possession, many other people were raided

ALL REFERENCES ABOVE FROM COMMUNITY LAW NEW ZEALAND WEBSITE

REFERENCE TO:- https://voicesforfreedom.co.nz/blog/post/midwives-challenge-legality-vaccination-order

New Zealand Midwives are challenging the government legality of the vax order.
Voices for Freedom are doing are wonderful job. Tahnk you.
A big thank you to those wonderful midwives too for having the courage to make NZ Government accountable for their insanity, demands on immunizations. (Human Experiments) T

27 October 2021, media release…..Midwives Challenging Legality of Vaccination Order…
Late on Friday 22 October 2021, the Minister of COVID-19 Response issued an order which amended the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021. That order was purportedly made under the COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020. It now specifies that, unless midwives submit to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination by 15 November 2021, they will lose their livelihoods and their vocation.

The order now applies to most workers in the health and disability sector, as well as prisons, schools and early childhood services.

The New Zealand Midwives’ Collective is a group of midwives from around New Zealand who have come together to oppose mandatory vaccination and uphold the right to informed choice and consent. On Monday a small group of midwives filed an application on behalf of the Collective, asking the High Court to declare the vaccination order invalid.

The basis for this challenge is that midwives, like all New Zealanders, have a right guaranteed under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 to refuse medical treatment that they do not want, whether or not anyone else agrees with their reasons for doing so. It is about the personal autonomy that we all enjoy over our bodies. If the Government wants to limit that right, it cannot do that in a regulation made under the authority of a general provision in a statute. On at least two occasions this year alone, the Supreme Court has held that “Parliament cannot abridge fundamental rights and freedoms by general or ambiguous words”. That is what has been done here and it is an affront to New Zealand’s constitutional norms.

The New Zealand Midwives Collective strongly opposes any restrictions being placed upon informed consent – a fundamental principle of midwifery in our country. They believe this is detrimental to the profession and a dangerous precedent that will adversely impact the rights of birthing families. Since the Cartwright Inquiry, it is a line that has not been crossed in health care and has been enshrined in law by the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights.

Informed consent, by definition, must acknowledge not only the benefits, but also any risks or alternatives. By definition, it also must be free from the threat of being denied the right to work as a midwife. The Collective says that there is an opportunity to open a solution-based paradigm, investigating legitimate alternatives and controls that have

been used successfully internationally. They do not agree that vaccination is the only answer.

The Collective understands that between 200 and 300 New Zealand midwives will decline the COVID-19 vaccination. That accounts for between 8 and 10% of all practicing midwives. If the order is not struck down, these midwives will be required to stop work on 15 November 2021. The Collective says:

“Our maternity system is already desperately short of midwives but the Government has continued to ignore our pleas to make urgent changes. There are already significant midwifery roster gaps within the DHBs. The decision to mandate this COVID-19 vaccine and the subsequent reduction in hospital midwife numbers will further increase the current workforce pressure for employed midwives and make it unsafe for the mothers and families for whom they care.”

It has been suggested that, if midwives who are Lead Maternity Carers (LMC) are unable to practice, the DHBs as the providers of last resort will have to ensure that maternity services continue to be provided safely to expectant mothers who can no longer access an LMC. The Collective questions whether there is a realistic contingency plan to cope with this shortfall. The irony is that the healthcare outcomes for mothers and babies which result from the Vaccination Order may be worse than those from which it is intended to shield New Zealanders.

The Collective says:-
“We are standing up to protect the rights of women. Our profession will always draw a line when it comes to informed consent and bodily autonomy. This is a not just a midwifery issue, this is a human issue, a feminist issue and a civil rights issue. All birthing women have the right to have bodily autonomy respected and midwives are the safeguards of that. It is a grossly hypocritical demand from our government, and our professional and statutory bodies, to expect us to surrender this right. Midwives are the guardians of this right for women around pregnancy, birth and postpartum. We are midwives, supporting midwives to have the same rights as the women for whom we care.”

This statement has been authorised for release by the New Zealand Midwives’ Collective, represented by the applicants in CIV 2021-485-584 F v Minister for COVID-19 Response.

For further details, please contact Christopher Griggs on (04) 914 1053