QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON MEDSAFE WEBSITE- https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/q-and-a-vaccine-safety.asp

Should I be getting a COVID-19 vaccine while I am pregnant?
Currently, the Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine is the only COVID-19 vaccine available in New Zealand. There is limited data with the use of Comirnaty in pregnant women. Animal studies have not indicated direct or indirect harmful effects in pregnancy, development of the fetus or the newborn (NOTE: DOES NOT DOCUMENT HUMAN STUDIES)

What adverse effects (or events) after vaccination are doctors, nurses, DHB staff, pharmacists required to report to the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM)?
There is no legal requirement for healthcare professionals to report adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs). However, we encourage healthcare professionals to report all AEFIs. Consumers can also report any reactions they experience to medicines and vaccines.
(NOTE: NO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO REPORT ADVERSE EFFECTS)

Are adverse events listed by the vaccine manufacturer in the package inserts and data sheets required to be reported to CARM?
There is no legal requirement to report adverse events. However, we encourage reporting of adverse events listed in the package inserts as well as any event that may be related to vaccination. ( NOTE: NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT )

If a patient has previously had an adverse event to a vaccine, can they receive a COVID-19 vaccine? (NOTE: AGAIN NO DIRECT ANSWER OF YES OR NO).

If a patient has previously had an adverse event to a vaccine, can they receive a COVID-19 vaccine?
Healthcare professionals should refer to the data sheet for information on contraindications to specific vaccines. These are published on our website.
(NOTE : AGAIN DOES NOT ANSWER YES OR NO )

Are the vaccines dangerous for people with previous COVID-19 infection?
The Cominarty clinical trials included people with previous COVID-19 infection. There are no known safety issues for people with previous infection. (NOTE: DOES NOT GIVE ANSWER YES OR NO)

Are the vaccines safe for children?
The Comirnaty vaccine is indicated for use in individuals aged 12 years and older. Clinical trials to assess safety and efficacy in children are ongoing. (NOTE: AGAIN NO YES OR NO ANSWER.. BUT TRIALS ARE STILL ONGOING… AS ARE THE HUMAN EXPERIMENTS ON OUR CHILDREN)

Are the vaccines safe for people with immunodeficiency or autoimmune conditions?
Refer to the vaccine’s Data Sheet or Consumer Medicine Information (CMI). (NOTE: STILL NO..YES OR NO ANSWERS)

What studies have Medsafe done to ensure the vaccine is safe for general use?
Medsafe does not conduct studies. Medsafe reviews the data submitted by the pharmaceutical company, including clinical trial data. (NOTE:- THEY DO NOT DO THEIR OWN TRIALS… NOTHING IS TRANSPARANT)

What is an acceptable number of side effects?
We encourage healthcare professionals and consumers to report any suspected side effect to a COVID-19 vaccine. For this reason, and because so many people will be receiving a vaccine, we expect many side effects to be reported.
Receiving large numbers of reports also indicates that the reporting system is working and easy to use.
Note that the cause of death is investigated and determined by the coroner, not by CARM or Medsafe. See the Coronial Services website (NOTE: DO NOT GIVE AN ANSWER AS TO ACCEPTABLE NUMBER OF SIDE EFFECTS..HOWEVER THEY WILL SEE AND THERE HAVE BEEN MANY MORE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS AND MORTALITIES)
ALSO PLEASE NOTE 5 -6 YEARS BACKLOG WITH INVESTIGATIONS IN CORONERIAL SERVICES.

It’s not a pretty picture, in fact its dam well ugly and evil, this official strategic partnership between the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (WEF)

The private activities of multistakeholder corporations, big tech, big pharma.. Monsanto-Bayer, Crops, chemicals and lab grown meat are all threatening New Zealand’s citizens as the UN-WEF official partnership hastily activate, accelerate UN Agenda 2030.

Jacinda Ardern has included UN Agenda 2030 into New Zealand’s policy making decisions. All fits like a hand in a glove promoting this private-public global governance, the UN partnership with the World Economic Forum.

The UN has now found it necessary after millions protesting across the world to strengthen and enforce international laws around global security.

The UN Charter included eradicating poverty, this global partnership increases poverty whilst 1% of the world’s wealthiest line their own greedy pockets.

The more government print money the higher inflation will become.

Our children and their children’s children will end up carrying this huge weight on their shoulders. Plus, sadly I say they will be doomed to being controlled like sheep, shoved into a pen for their life-time vaccinations. This is included in UN Agenda 2030.. new vaccines-95% participation rate if not more. (UN) IA 2030.

The WEF reported in 2010 their aim was for a global cooperation with the UN. WEF represent Multistakeholder Capitalist Corporations.

While the evolution of multistakeholder governance is occurring principally at the international level, public-private partnerships are already in the making throughout the world.

Stakeholders refer to a collection of actors from different social, political, economic spheres working intentionally together to govern a physical, social, economic, or policy area. The range of actors can include multinational corporations, national enterprises, governments, civil society bodies, academic experts, community leaders, religious figures, media personalities and other institutional groups.

As an evolving global governance form, only a limited number of organizations and institutions are involved in multistakeholderism. In a number of arenas, opposing forces are actively challenging the legitimacy, accountability, and effectiveness of these experimental changes in global governance.

We are talking of transnational multistakeholder capitalist corporations being favoured with government policies. Accelerating UN Agenda 2030. Follow the money, always follow the power, and those political forces that seek immense control over citizens

PLEASE GO TO THE LINK WITHIN THE IMAGE ABOVE TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO WITH FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE ABOVE

NOTE: IF YOU HAVE NOT JOINED MY WEBSITE PLEASE DO SO NOW.. THANK YOU

Stuff NZ reported 10th April 2021 that Matthew Tukaka had been residing in Australia had returned three years ago. Tukaka was born in Upper Hutt and evidently his mum and dad were hard working people. He later went to Australia where he worked at the top of the rung for Drake International.

Later he became a key player in the UN Global Compact, he represented Australia on the UN Global Compact Advisory Board. He has continued to promote UN Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Goals publically and privately.

Matthew Tukaki was the United Nations Global Compact’s Australian Representative from 2010 until 2013. … In that same month he was also elected as the chairperson of the United Nations Global Compact’s Local Network Advisory Group; he retired from these roles in November 2013.

Matthew Tukaka, Mark Solomon and Hone Hawira certainly have private business connections.

Tukaka and his followers have deliberately targeted posted on social media scathing remarks about Damien Dement, Brad Fluety, Vinny Eastwood, Kelvyn Alp and Counterspin and Karen Brewer, no doubt my name will be highlighted now as I publish on my website information and a link to a Rumble Video on information pertaining to Tukaka.

Recently Tukaka blamed the above mentioned names, as being alt-right, white supremacists who are responsible for Maori who have taken part in protests across the country opposing the Ardern’s Government narrative which has highlights the deliberate erosion of citizens freedoms and human rights.

Each person is individually unique, they walk in their own shoes, have their own voice, use their own feet to march on. New Zealanders of many cultures including those that have Maori blood running through their veins are marching for this generation and the next one. Their children and grandchildren. We stand together, united we stand in the name of freedom, human dignity. Human Dignity is at the core of all Human Rights Declarations, Acts, Agreements nationally, internationally.

UN Declaration of Rights for Indigenous Peoples and also the 1966

Self-determination denotes the legal right of people to decide their own destiny in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law, arising from customary international law, but also recognized as a general principle of law, and enshrined in a number of international treaties.

It is recognized as a right of all peoples in the first article common to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which both entered into force in 1976. … All peoples have the right to self-determination.

The 1966 United Nations Covenants on Human Rights commences with the phrase “all peoples have the right of self determination”. (NOTE- ALL PEOPLE)

Matthew Tukaka is not happy about Maori protesters waving the Maori Flag doing the Haka and signing waiata’s at protest gatherings, he blames this on white supremacy and alt-right. Why is he so intent on targeting those that love, are loyal to their country… Maori, Non-Maori and this includes many cultures??
The video I have produced will no doubt give you the reason why..

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE IN THE IMAGE THAT SHARES WITH YOU MORE INFORMATION ON MATTHEW TUKAKA

The COVID-19 Public Health Response Act was enacted in May 2020, at a very early point in Aotearoa New Zealand’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, nobody knew how long we would be dealing with the pandemic and there were still a lot of unknowns about the virus. This bill aims to update that Act to better reflect developing knowledge of how long the public health response may be necessary, to address the reliance of MIQ on the general law and operational decisions, and to ensure that the empowering and enforcement provisions are suitable for preventing and managing the risk of the outbreak and spread of COVID-19.

What does this bill mean?

Provisions in the bill will make many changes to the existing COVID-19 Public Health Response Act. The legislation:

Extends the time the Act is in effect until May 2023

Increases the maximum fines and fees for infringements (with fees of up to $4000 and fines of up to $12,000 for individuals), and enables new regulations to set a sliding scale of infringement offences

Refines the powers of COVID-19 orders, including by broadening their purpose, incorporating material by reference, and improving delegations
allows for the creation of COVID-19 orders for requisitioning testing consumables and requiring labs doing COVID-19 testing to do so for the national public health response, with appropriate compensation and a disputes appeal process

Expressly recognises the ability of the chief executive of the agency responsible for MIQ (currently the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment) to impose room restrictions on people undertaking isolation or quarantine. For example, the chief executive may allow or disallow people from taking their daily exercise if they deem it necessary to ensure the health and safety of MIQ workers.

The bill also makes several changes to how Managed Isolation and Quarantine (MIQ) works.

It creates a process for making complaints about MIQ, enables the chief executive of the responsible agency to make rules for the day-to-day operation of MIQ facilities
Makes people automatically liable for MIQ charges unless they are exempt, enables MIQ to collect contact details from people undertaking isolation or quarantine to support invoicing for MIQ charges. Shifts provisions regarding the allocation and prioritisation of spaces in MIQ from COVID-19 orders to primary legislation.

The Bill does not change any existing safeguards in the original Act, including the requirements for the House to pass resolutions to continue the Act on a periodic basis, the prerequisites for COVID-19 orders, or the requirement that all COVID-19 orders be consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Who might this bill affect?
The legislation will have an impact on everyone in Aotearoa New Zealand, but may particularly affect:

People seeking to return to NZ
Essential workers
People who provide COVID-19 tests and testing services
The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment

PLEASE NOTE: NOTHING HAS STOPPED NEW RESIDENCY IN NEW ZEALAND … THE GOVERNMENT IMMIGRATION ‘PATH’ PROGRAM… 165,000 NEW NEW ZEALAND RESIDENCIES BY JULY 2022.