CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

HANDS OF OUR CHILDREN NOW

New Zealand perverted sexualization of children. The NZ Herlad titles this article ‘Controversial book: ‘Welcome to Sex

‘ a ‘fabulous Resource says sexuality educator” 31st July 2023

This is what the NZ Herald reports:- Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out by Dr Melissa Kang and Yumi Stynes is being stocked in libraries around New Zealand.. A controversial book about sex aimed at children is a “fabulous” resource and answers the questions kids are asking, a relationship and sexuality educator says. The book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out, by former Dolly Doctor and youth health expert Dr Melissa Kang and TV personality Yumi Stynes, is making waves after a library user complained on social media about its inclusion on the shelves… The book, targeted at 11- to 14-year-olds, traverses everything from consent and sexuality to sexual positions.

And although this is  a disgusting  book Tracy Clelland  a lecturer at Canterbury University said “ most parents actually want this book to help educate their children”. And refers to children as young as 9 years old asking about sex toys and anal sex.

Seriously people lets get a grip on this. We really do need to ‘drain the swamp’.  This book doesn’t border on grooming. It is the sexually grooming of our children.  So what do the public libraries have to say, here is one response “The Library and Information Association of New Zealand Aotearoa (Lianza) said it was important for libraries to have an inclusive collections”. Comment from LIANZ) “In situations such as in the case of Welcome to Sex, there may be disagreements over the content. However, libraries don’t make individual decisions for their readers about what is appropriate,

A Hutt City Council spokeswoman said it took all feedback about books in the libraries’ collections seriously and had reassessed Welcome to Sex.

“We support the view of the libraries’ professional body, Lianza, on this book and we will continue to have it in our collections.” The book is also in libraries across the country, including in Auckland, Christchurch and Tauranga.

So, what does Auckland Council head of Library and Learning Services – Catherine Leonard have to say on this  childhood sexuality  grooming book “Our role is not to censor: and “Auckland Libraries are like all other public libraries in NZ, committed to freedom of access to information, we will not supress or remove material simply because it offends people. Can’t help thinking this “What an Ignorant  evil bxtch”, yep though it but dare not say it in public “You know, freedom of speech and all that stuff”   Come-On People who are going to protect our children if we as adults are not prepared to front up and loudly speak up?  HANDS OF OUR CHILDRFEN NOW…

 

DISLAIMER: None of the content in this blog has been influenced by Rock The Vote

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/controversial-book-welcome-to-sex-a-fabulous-resource-sexuality-educator-says/KOQSA3T2LBFVDNQWV5VW4CXYPA/

 

...

BURP.. BURP…BURP…TARGETING THE COWS ON THE FARM WITH BULLSHITE AND DECEITFUL LIES

Bill Gates another of those famous Elit e investors of ‘ the WEF/UN Corporate Stakeholder Capitalism’. puppeteers , have jumped on the gravy train of methane emissions (cow burps)

Bill Gates and his  ‘Breakthrough Energy Ventures has invested in Perth based Rummin8 that produces a  synthetically produced additive to feed cows to cut down on the burp..burp..burp.. bugger far too many burps.Breakthrough Energy Ventures was founded in 2015 by Bill Gates, same year as UN Agenda 2030 was introduced globally, always fully promoted and supported by the wealthy global elite that gather at annual DAVOS meetings. Breakthrough Energy Ventures is backed by Amazon, Alibaba, Jeff Bezos

It was reported that over a 100 year period methane is 28  to 34 times as warming as CO2.

But and there is always a but, what are they not telling you whilst they are busy targeting the farmers and his cows on the farm?  Well Christopher Luxon has not said he would completely take targeting the farmer with  methane emissions out of the picture, just a pause until 2030.  Lets take a leap back to 2011 to British Climate Researcher Dr, Wilson Flood, he wrote an article for the Academic Journal ‘Energy & Environment to counter the growing hysteria around methane. He publicly put the record straight about the misconceptions that methane is a dangerous greenhouse gas. He explained “the quantity of methane in the air is so small that even doubling it would not produce any appreciable warming, but that the rate of the increase of the gas in the atmosphere is so slow it would take 360 years to double” He added “Since the warming ability of methane is only 7 times that of carbon dioxide, livestock presents “no conceivable threat of any kind”, and cows and sheep “cannot contribute to global warming in any conceivable way”. He concluded that “research into altering the diet of farm animals to reduce dietary methane is hugely wasteful of resources.”.

It doesn’t end there. Barry Brill the president of the NZ Climate Science Coalition and a former  Government Minister also has a gave a comprehensive review  on methane as he referred to the UN IPCC saying that they now admits that “methane is 7 times (not 28) more effective at being a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide” – with their Sixth Assessment Report stating at page 1016 of Chapter 7, “…expressing methane emissions as CO2 equivalent of 28, overstates the effect on global surface temperature by a factor of 3-4.” Barry Brill went on to say  “No doubt this took the legs out from under Minister Shaw. He had been personally briefed on the flaws in 2019, but in a later answer to a Parliamentary Question said he was not a climate scientist himself and would be guided by the IPCC. That hasn’t happened yet.”

Barry Brill believes this revelation that the warming ability of methane is only 7 times that of carbon dioxide, instead of 28, “changes everything. All the scenarios and budgets are now clearly wrong… If methane will cause only 25 percent as much warming as previously expected, then we won’t need those huge reductions, that appear in the now-outdated scenarios. With this new understanding, the 1.5°C aspirational goal comes back within our collective grasp – and with much less pain and anxiety than used to be expected. It’s wonderful news, and a win-win all around. Let’s celebrate!”

The Political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington still are insistently, persistently attacking the farmers and the cows down on the farm.. The NZ Government announced in 2022 NZ farmers will be the first in the world to be targeted with the methane emissions levy., hence ripping the guts out of rural small towns in New Zealand. . The billion tree’s in NZ scenario would take the place of honour. Hey people ‘Wake Up New Zealand’ “Your can’t eat dam tree’s”.   Corporate Capitalism is certainly being promoted by most MPs in Parliament.   I haven’t started on Blackrock or Vanguard as yet.  But the crazies Hipkins and Megan Wood praising BlackRock and the 2 Billion investment in the ‘Climate cow shite in NZ”.   A few wake up calls in my next blog.  People remember you are the target number 1. “You can’t eat tree’s” and if you think ‘Corporate capture will save your arse I suggest you join the insane ‘woke brigade’

 

PLEASE NOTE: This is a disclaimer. Rock the Vote have not influenced or played any part in this blog. You will find the avenues I have researched on my website. https://wakeupnz.org

 

https://www.nzcpr.com/labours-climate-scandal/

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64382400

https://apnews.com/article/business-new-zealand-animals-emissions-reduction-climate-and-environment-6f8847bc10ecdd0ba4d5c23bdab5617d

...

IWI RIGHTS AND INTERESTS ‘UN AGENDA 2030’ GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS

BRIEFING NOTE ‘INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS AND 2030’    SEPTEMBER 2017

Indigenous key priorities and specific references in UN Agenda 2030. The SDGs explicitly include indigenous peoples. Two of the SDG targets make specific references to indigenous peoples, committing to double agricultural output of indigenous small-scale farmers and to ensure equal access to education for indigenous children.

There is also a strong commitment in the 2030 Agenda to empower and engage indigenous peoples in implementing and reviewing progress in achieving the goals. In addition, the proposed global list of indicators5 to measure progress on the SDGs includes several indicators that indigenous peoples had called for, including indicators that measure income of indigenous small-scale food producers and indigenous peoples’ access to education.

The proposed indicator to measure secure land rights makes an important reference to “type of tenure” which can capture the dimension of collective land rights which is central to indigenous peoples’ collective relationship to their lands, territories and resources.

Of particular relevance is also the indicator on peoples’ perception of discrimination based on prohibited grounds of discrimination in international human rights law, which could be used to trace progress on indigenous peoples’ experiences of discrimination.

The global indicator list constitutes a practical starting point, while Member States have expressed a need for further methodological development and improvement of data availability, which at a global level will be taken forward by the Inter-Agency Expert Group on SDG 6 .

Further, national statistical offices will now be developing national indicator frameworks, where it is essential to advocate for inclusion of the relevant global indicators as well as call for additional indicators of relevance to indigenous peoples in the local context.

Where to find the references to indigenous peoples in the 2030 Agenda resolution (A/RES/70/1) • Empowerment, engagement and education of indigenous peoples (Preamble: paragraphs 23, 25 and 52) • Ending hunger through sustainable agriculture (SDG2 , target 2.3) • Ensuring access to education for indigenous peoples (SDG4, target 4.5) • Indigenous peoples’ participation in follow-up and review

Disaggregation of data: To ensure that no one is left behind, the 2030 Agenda calls for States “to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts” (target 17.18).  Data-disaggregation according to indigenous or ethnic identity across all sustainable development goals must also be included to monitor progress for indigenous peoples. A critical priority at national level is therefore to ensure that data disaggregation includes “indigenous identifiers” (for instance language or self-identification in official statistics to capture the inequalities indigenous peoples face across all the sustainable development goals. Furthermore, the adoption of a human rights-based approach to data is essential, including respecting self-identification.

Land rights, poverty and hunger The sustainable development goals could contribute to securing indigenous peoples’ control over their land, territories and resources. The SDG targets, for instance, recognise the importance of equal rights to economic resources as well as equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In addition, the 2030 Agenda’s emphasis on promotion of resilient and sustainable agricultural practices and maintenance of seed diversity are consistent with efforts to promote for food security and poverty eradication amongst indigenous peoples. Yet, land is not merely an economic asset for indigenous peoples. It is defining element for their identity, culture and their relationship to their ancestors and future generations.  There is a need for recognition of indigenous land tenure systems as well as of the situation of indigenous nomadic and semi-nomadic communities. To secure indigenous peoples’ land rights.

It is essential that the 2030 Agenda implementation is taking in to account the principle of free, prior and informed consent and adequate consultations related to indigenous peoples’ lands and development priorities, as referred to in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Find the relevant targets: • Equal rights to economic resources (SDG1, target 1.4) • Promotion of resilient and sustainable agricultural practices (SDG2, target 2.3 and 2.4) • Maintenance of seed diversity (SDG2, target 2.5) • Equitable sharing of benefits from traditional knowledge (SDG2, target 2.5) Social Security, health and education

LINK: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/IPeoples/BriefingPaperIPRights2030Agenda.pdf

...

I HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY TARGET PRACTICE FOR THE FAR LEFT- MAINSTREAM MEDIA-AND A RADICAL FACEBOOK GROUP- POLICE & CERTAIN IWI

LET ME FIRSTLY MAKE THIS KNOWN.. I HAVE NOT A CRIMINAL… I AM A  LAW ABIDING CITIZEN…..I HAVE NO CONVICTIONS AND A CLEAN DRIVERS LICENCE… I AM A RESEARCHER- I SEEK THE TRUTH… I INTEND TO EXPOSE THE TRUTH – I INTEND TO EXPOSE CORRUPT LIES. I KNOW I AM WALKING ON BROKEN GLASS….BUT YOU GET USE TO IT EVENTUALLY. ‘THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE’ BECAUSE GOD IS MY MAKER AND THE CREATOR OF ALL.  GOD SAVE NEW ZEALAND.

I started becoming target practice for far left socialists and Main Stream and Social Media in December 2018. Speaking publicly in Aotea Square Auckland about Freedoms, Bill Of Rights and my objection to the UN Global Compact of Migration was first felt when Police aimed their camera’s at me, and then later that day police standing in a line as I heard shouts ‘Go Home’ and ‘Go Home NOW’. I knew then,  that political policing had started in our beautiful country. It was about this time that Lee Williams had a visit from the police, his street where he lived closed off by Police. The police questioning went like this “Do you support Trump”.  Another Conservative Party member also got a visit from the police the questioning went like this “Do you know a Conservative Candidate”.

Later supporting Groundswell stopped in our vehicle at the traffic lights, the media called out to me to wind my window down they wanted to interview me. Lesson number one “never trust main stream media”, this was my lesson to learn. They asked my why I was supported the farmers, I was well researched had no problems with this and happily spoke about it. Then suddenly the reporter said “What are those words on your hat” I just replied “Make Ardern Go Away” (MAGA). When the news item was run publicly all that was seen and heard was me stating “Make Ardern Go Away”.  (Never again will this happen) And yes I have police at my door wanting to give me a warning letter not to attend a protest. I would not accept it, they tried to put it in my hand. So they just dropped it on the ground in front of my feet. The police left, I went to the protest and the warning notice just blew away..that was it.

On June the 12th my daughter up north contacted me and asked had I seen this NZ Herald Article from 2021″ I said “No I do not buy any of this Propaganda bullcrap”. She then sent me the information where I had been character assassinated by David Fisher Senior Reporter of the NZ Herald where he had referred to a Facebook Group called FACT. That they had done a 60,000 letterbox drop on names and info on Anti-Vaxers but they had sneaked in the content of their information that ‘Carol Sakey inspired the Mosque Attacks in Christchurch’. This was all reported in the Herald by David Fisher.   So I decided I would send a complaint to various government agencies.

I waited for over a month for reply, received nothing, only an acknowledgement they had received the complaint. So once again I emailed them and stated that my complaint was going to the UN Human Rights Commission…With that NZ Human Rights Commission responded saying that they were not the agency to complain to. And that was it.  Below is what I emailed to the Media Council. Broadcasting Standards Authority….Human Rights Commission. The Ombudsman and then UN Human Rights Council.  (Of course I knew they would deliberately kick me to the kerb but I felt I had to go through the process)

 

COMPLAINT AGAINST: NZ Herald Senior Writer David Fisher. FACT (Fight Against Conspiracy Theories) and Byron Clark of Workers Party NZ. Christchurch

13th June 2023

TO:‘NZ MEDIA COUNCIL’  info@mediacouncil.org.nz  -cc: BROADCASTING STANDARDS AUTHORITY:  info@bsa.govt.nz – cc: Human Rights Commission: infoline@hrc.co.nz – cc OMBUDSMAN info@ombudsman.parliament.nz

FROM: Carol Sakey

COMPLAINT AGAINGST: NZ Herald Senior Writer David Fisher.  FACT (Fight Against Conspiracy Theories) and Byron Clark of Workers Party NZ. Christchurch

On the 12th June 2023 I received an email from a close family member who was extremely upset at an article written by David Fisher Senior reporter of the NZ Herald, the news article was entitled     ‘The Real News: Who is really behind the Covid-19 conspiracy magazine being dropped into 60,000 letterboxes’. A link from the NZ Herald article was provided to a Facebook group called ‘FACT’ (Fights Against Conspiracy Theories) described as  informal group of NZ Academics and professionals. In David Fishers news article  was dated 12th March 2021, he named named Doctors, Nurses, Health Professionals  also included in amongst the names and professional descriptions of approx.., 120 names is  Henare Parata (Atuakore. Maori Athiests and Freethinkers) and Joe Trinder (Indigenous Rights Activist whom were amongst those that signed this 60,000  letterbox drop.

David Fisher stated very clearly and concisely that he was accusing me of inspiring the very cruel  Christchurch Mosque Attacks. In his  NZ Herald news article he wrote   ‘Carol Sakey who spreads the ‘Great Replacement’ theory inspired the Christchurch terrorist attackNOTE: David Fisher has provided no evidence, only a link to this  informal group namely FACT on Facebook.

David Fisher concludes his article with the last paragraph that reads :- ‘But when those who claim to be experts in the medical field are seen to endorse groups which promote conspiracy theories and lies that cause harm, they are not acting responsibly for the greater good. “We believe that it’s inappropriate for Plan B – a group that claims it wants to promote rational fact-based discussion – to legitimise Voices for Freedom”, says Andrew Mackie, a FACT spokesperson’ and  is also reported by  David Fisher. “Voices for Freedom claims to be a harmless group of health-conscious mums, but the reality is more sinister. It actively promotes conspiracy theories and medical misinformation and supports political extremists. Plan B consists of academics and doctors who should know better than to support and legitimise Voices for Freedom. PLEASE NOTE: I do not  speak on behalf of Voices For Freedom’, and never have.  I am a researcher. Please find below links to UN News, UN Assembly, and the Beehive Website

BYRON CLARK: New Zealand Workers Party Christchurch has deliberately targeted me on social media and intentionally edited my You Tube video’s since I submitted a petition application into Parliamentary office objecting to the UN Global Compact Of Migration. In November 2018. My petition application was scrutinised and the content was accepted, approved by the Parliamentary office and eventually accepted by the Select Committee. Because of the Mosque attack the select committee process did not take place until after the Mosque attack, there was a delay in the process. It was clear that Byron Clark  opposed my objection to NZ Government signing the UN Global Compact of Migration, but I, deliberately ignored the reasons for rejecting the UN Global Compact of Migration. These are laid out below.:-

CAROL SAKEY PETITION TO SELECT COMMITTEE AS TO OBJECTION TO THE N GLOBAL COMPACT OF MIGRATION: Included my concerns in my petition/submission to the Select Committee includes the following (with evidence provided):

1)NZ’ National Security and the safety and security of New Zealanders. The UNGCM content including the acceptance of ‘Irregular’ Migrants/Refugee’s (Irregular defined as ‘illegal’)

2) Thousands of New Zealand Citizens were waiting on the public housing list. Migrants/refugee’s entitled to public housing before that of NZ citizens that were on the public housing waiting list.

3) Mainstream news reporting of the total failure of Mental Health Services in NZ, with a statement from an MP “This will take some time to fix). I noted that Migrants/Refugee’s are likely to require Mental Health Support services, therefore unfair to them and New Zealanders alike.

4) Mainstream reporting of shortage of school teachers. Teachers had arrived from oversea’s but returned to their country of origin due to the high cost of living in NZ. House Prices, Rents etc.,

5) The taxpayers of NZ to support Refugee’s/Migrants who return back to their own country of origin. I believed that to be totally unjustified to rob tax payers pockets when many people in New Zealand were already struggling.

6) Freedom of Press where the Mainstream media must report Migration in a certain way, if they were not compliant public funding would not be forthcoming.

7) The acceptance into NZ of Regular and Irregular Migration Status (Legal and Illegal )

Since I  publicly started seeking names to add to my petition in 2018 objecting to the UNGCM I have been unjustly character assassinated,. Alt Right. White Supremacist. Islamophobic etc.,

To prove that I am neither of these – I researched the Royal Commission Inquiry into the Mosque Attacks through the Royal Commission of Inquiry Website. This included 17 Questions to the Royal Commission Inquiry on the Mosque attacks by the Community which the Commission responded to, please see below:-

 

17 QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE COMMUNITY TO ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY’RIGHT WING EXTREMISM PRIOR TO MARCH 15TH 2019

1)QUESTION: Were public sector agencies aware of the threat posed by white supremacists and other right wing extremist non-state actors and movements? Is so what did they do in response to the threat?

ANSWER: The primary focus of intelligence was international terrorism, particularly the threat to New Zealanders overseas. Assessment on international terrorism was primarily focused on Islamic Extremist Terrorism.  In the past 5 years leading up to 2018 there were few strategic assessments about terrorism threats in New Zealand and practically none on threats other than Islamic Terrorism. Right Wing Extremism before the March 2019: NZ SIS reported that there was an awareness of a threat posed by right wing was developing but it was limited.  NZ SIS started its baselining project in May 2018.     Following a meeting in December 2018 NZ Police took preliminary steps to undertake their own exercises on the extreme right    In response the NZ SIS and NZ Police conducted a tabletop computer counter-terrorism response exercise in October 2018 based on a scenario of an assumed motor vehicle attack on worshipper out Masjid an Nur Mosque.

 

2)QUESTION: What Intelligence did agencies receive from Five Eyes Partners regarding ‘White Supremacy and Right Wing Extremism before 15th March 2019?

ANSWER: Very little international partner reporting related to right wing extremism. For example the 2nd quarter of the 2018-2019 financial year, the Govt Communications Security Bureau received 7,526 intelligence reports from International Partners about Terrorism and Violent Extremism NONE were related to Right Wing Extremism

 

3)QUESTION: Given the upward trend in white Supremacist and other Right Wing Extremist Acts of Violence (Actual and Prevented) in the decade prior to March 15th 2019. Why was there no concern of this happening in New Zealand until 2018?

ANSWER: Counter terrorism largely concentrated on the threat of Islamic Terrorism, Islamic extremism being seen as the presenting threat

 

 4)QUESTION: Were there any assessments done regarding danger to Muslim Communities? If so what was the result

ANSWER: Strategic and tactical intelligence assessments primarily focus on the threat posed and who poses the threat rather than risk to particular communities. Intelligence assessment can relate specifically to the risk to events or locations.  There was one NZ Police Intelligence Assessment produced prior to March 2019, referring to the risk to Muslim Communities. May 2018 a National Security Situation Update Report

 

PLEASE NOTE: The Risk was namely: Referred to the time of ‘Ramadan 2018’ which provided the NZ Police Assistant Commissions and District Commanders that Da’ish had issued calls for terrorist attacks against Ramadan for the previous three years, and could again. It advised that Ramadan was also a time of increased risk to the Muslim Community and was noted by the NZ Police Commissioners and District Commanders. That Daesh is a name used to refer to ISIS/ISIL. The radical Sunni Muslim Organization, it’s a name said to delegitimise the groups claim to be an Islamic State. ISIL or Daish refers to the fundamentalist organization of the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. Tarrant had no criminal history in New Zealand or Australia before 15th March 2019.

 

5)QUESTION: Was white supremacy and right wing extremism included in the current National Security and Intelligence priorities as an area of focus for counter terrorism?

ANSWER: No not specifically. The Prime Ministers Cabinet in December 2018 included a terrorism priority, it included Domestic as well as International Terrorism threats but did not refer to particular ideologies. The Domestic Terrorism threats were described as those that may arise in and against New Zealand, or be carried out by New Zealanders overseas. And the scope included emerging trends and characteristics associated with overseas terrorist networks linked to NZ.

 

International Terrorism threats: Were described as ‘threats against New Zealand’s interests overseas in areas which have the greatest exposure for New Zealanders, these being the trends, characteristics of emerging regional and global terrorism threats, that may impact on NZ. An ‘Unclassified version of the National Security and Intelligence Priorities was initially published in the department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 2019 Annual Report.

In September 2020 the Dept of the PM and Cabinet updated its website to include an unclassified version of the National Security & Intelligence Priorities which included:-‘Terrorism. Threats to New Zealand. New Zealanders and New Zealand’s interests from terrorism, ideologically, politically motivated violence at home and abroad’

The strategic assessment that informed the 2018 priorities did not mention white supremacy or right wing extremism. (Reported NZ SIS). The NZ SIS with the NZ Police and Dept of the PM and Cabinet are the owner of the terrorism risk profile in the National Risk Register which informed the development of the NZ SIS Priorities in 2018. Ardern and her Cabinet were involved in this 2018 assessment that did not mention white supremacy or right wing extremism

The Royal Commission Inquiry reported that : An extreme right wing lone actor attack in NZ remained a possibility, albeit a remote one.

 

PERSONAL INFORMATION: I am a mother and grandmother of 17 grandchildren of many nationalities. I have worked and supported those from other countries as a volunteer of ‘Speaking English as a Second Language

I have been a member of the NZ Youth Court Association Committee. I was a manager of Victim Support working alongside Police 24 x7. I took part in training at NZ Police college to work alongside detectives in the area of Homicide and Suicide.

I was a facilitator for Restorative Justice. Also worked alongside Police and NZCPS in a first ever pilot scheme supporting victims of crime at family group conference.

Worked as a Family Therapist and Counsellor, facilitator of support Groups of those affected by Childhood sexual Abuse. Worked voluntarily for Age Concern. And also for Hospice, helping patients with  ‘End of life story writing’. Worked alongside Judge Brown (RIP) in the Youth Court, including writing an article for Te Rangitahi News.

 

CONCLUSION: From all the above evidential information provided there is absolutely no justification in the persons I have named for character assassinating me, recklessly putting myself and my families life at risk of  serious harm. This has caused us unnecessary stress by the serious accusation made that ‘I inspired the Mosques attacks in Christchurch on 15th March 2019’.

I am seriously concerned that the statement made by David Fisher, NZ Herald  puts my life and my families life in danger of possible retribution of such callous cruel public statements, and should never be tolerated

I request that the above named are taken to task as to the dangerous reckless message they have given to the public of New Zealand about me which risks causing myself and my family serious harm.

I also request that a public retraction, an apology is made by Byron Clark, David Fisher and Andrew Mackie spokesperson of FACT, for seriously harmful statements made against me as a person.

The extremely harmful statement made by David Fisher that has risked causing huge public attention. That David Fisher drew public attention through his news article that there had been a 60,000 letterbox drop by the Facebook Group ‘FACT’ referring to Carol Sakey (myself) Inspired the Christchurch Mosque Attacks through spreading the ‘Great Replace Theory’. There is no evidence of this and I find this to be sheer bloody mindedness, corrupt lies which risks causing my family and myself harm.

PLEASE NOTE: I do not read the Herald so therefore I have only just been emailed the news article today 13th June 2023 by a close family member who is extremely concerned and has every right to be.

 

LINK TO NZ HERALD NEWS ARTCLE: 

The Real News: Who is really behind the Covid-19 conspiracy magazine being dropped into 60,000 letterboxes

 By  David Fisher  12 Mar, 2021 02:13 PM

Dangerous Liaisons in a Pandemic: An Open Letter to “Plan B” from FACT (Fight Against Conspiracy Theories) Anti-misinformation campaigners call on Covid Plan B members to end their support of Voices for Freedom and to condemn groups promoting conspiracy theories

FACT (Fight Against Conspiracy Theories) is an informal group of New Zealand academics, health workers and professionals who want to stop the spread of dangerous misinformation about Covid 19 and vaccines. ‘ Carol Sakey, who spreads the “Great Replacement” theory which inspired the Christchurch terrorist attack’. And includes 100 plus professional, non professional, and activists names and each of their descriptions, also a Link to FACT (Andrew Mackie spokesperson)

If you’d like to sign this letter, please email Andrew Mackie, factaotearoa@gmail.com

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-real-news-who-is-really-behind-the-covid-19-conspiracy-magazin e-being-dropped-into-60000-letterboxes/V3CSQAQNUD4RCEUXXB7YPHZDNQ/

12th March 2021 David Fisher 
KERI KERI, NEW ZEALAND

 

I seek a response from you at your earliest.

Carol Sakey.

...