MANY GROUPS WITH MAORI BLOOD DO NOT CALL THEMSELVES INDIGENOUS

The terminology ‘Indigenous Peoples’ first came to NZ in the early 1970’s.

President of the UN World Indigenous Council visited to NZ in early 1970. Also visited Aborigine in the Northern Territories of Australia thus the expansion of this terminology worldwide

Please visit my video link below for further information

How did this terminology enter New Zealand learn more from my video. Click on the image which will link you to my video

Indigenous Peoples in transforming our world have an invested interest in United Nations Agenda 21, universal global development goals, which is extremely strong and hypo-political. Indigenous Indicators are integrated into UN Agenda 2030. (Indicators  (1.42 )and (5 a 1 ) on land Iwi/Maori interests and rights. This is established at a global level, is actioned, promoted at a country level thus advancing UN Agenda 2030, monitoring, measuring, promoting Indigenous  tribal progress as to UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals at a local level. This is reported as a work in progress.

A UN  high level political meeting referenced to in a 2030 Resolution follow up review  A/RES/701299)  11^th July 2016  which included thematic discussions with Indigenous peoples at the very core of UN Agenda 2030, as  Indigenous Tribal Rights, Indigenous Development Goals .are reported to be essential self-determination to accelerate promote growth modification

Indigenous Indicators embedded in UN Agenda 2030 key players in NZ are Iwi Elite in partnership with NZ Government. Global, regional, national political forums support the framework of this strategic plan to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 in New Zealand, with UN Member State governments facilitating Indigenous Peoples at national level to be given ‘rights’ that other do not have (As per non-binding agreement 2007 UNDRIP). The using of Indigenous Agenda 2030 indicators, with specific measurements through an established Iwi/Māori Digital Sovereignty, an Iwi tribal Sovereignty with Iwi Aspirations

Prof. Dawn Freshwater of Auckland University documented  an article referencing Iwi/Maori knowledge to research Disinformation and to tackle UN Agenda 2030 goals, to drive the global development goals of Agenda 2030 in relation to climate change and the  decolonization agenda.

Iwi/Māori  Elite have the ability to interrogate information to maximize impacts through Indigenous Sovereignty Data transferred, translated into different contexts.

The United Nations Association of NZ hosted an Advancing Agenda 2030 Conference  in the  Banquet Hall in Parliament. It was  reported that NZ was at mid-point to achieving UN Agenda 2030 however accelerated actions are needed. The conference highlighted  key speakers such as  Ashley Bloomfield .

Other speakers were Ibrahim Omer, Carolyn Schwaiger NZ Representative to the UN New York, Mary Wareham Advocacy Director of the Arms Div., of the human Rights watch and Sophie Handford Kapiti Coast District Council.

Topics at the gathering included ‘Climate Change, reforming the UN and countering Disinformation. Hosted by the UN Association NZ.  And also New Zealand advances UN Agenda 2030 through Iwi/Maori Digital Sovereignty and multi-stakeholder partnership with the government implemented at a High Political Level by the UN as to Indigenous Peoples Rights to ‘self determination’. Co-Governance in NZ.

Researched By Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ

WHERE ARE THE REPORTS ABOUT HEALTH AND SAFETY AS TO THE PUBLIC WEARING FACIAL MASKS DURING COVID AS A MANDATORY RESTRICTION??  ARE THEY SAFE????  WakeUpNZ..Carol Sakey

MAY 9TH 2023 A NEW STUDY SUGGESTS THAT EXCESS CARBON DIOXIDE BREATHED UIN BY MASK WEARERS CAN HAVE A MAJOR HEALTH CONSEQUENCES. Evidence continues to supports that mandating face mask wearing was one of those worst mandatory health restrictions made in modern history worldwide. The Cochrane Report referring to “probably makes little to no difference in prevention of the spread of viruses”. The report quantifying the harms caused by mask wearing. A new study in Germany referring to ‘excess carbon dioxide breathed in by mask wearers can have substantial ill effects on health, also referencing  pregnant women and their unborn children

It is reported that mask wearers breathe in greater amounts of air, without a mask on this would have been expelled out through the body, that ‘fresh air has around 0.04% CO@ whilst chronic exposure of CO2 levels of 0.3 percent is toxic’. So how much CO2 levels do face mask wearers breathe in is the question? The authors of the report state that ‘“masks bear a possible chronic exposure to low level carbon dioxide of 1.41–3.2% CO2 of the inhaled air in reliable human experiments’

This relates to 8 times the normal level of the CO2 is toxic, the research suggests that mask wearers, specifically those that wear masks longer than 5 minutes at a time are breathing in 35 to 80 times normal levels. The German study aimed to investigate the toxicological effects of face masks in terms of CO2 rebreathing on developing life, specifically for pregnant women and unborn children, children and adolescents. Despite low levels of risks of severe COVID effects on children they have also been subject to mandates, and there is evidence that masks do not work.

The authors of the Cochrane Report writes that  “at levels between 0.05% and 0.5% CO2,” one might experience an “increased heart rate, increased blood pressure and overall increased circulation with the symptoms of headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, dizziness, rhinitis, and dry cough.”

Rates above 0.5 percent can lead to “reduced cognitive performance, impaired decision-making and reduced speed of cognitive solutions.” Beyond 1 percent, “the harmful effects include respiratory acidosis, metabolic stress, increased blood flow and decreased exercise tolerance.” Again, mask-wearers are likely breathing in CO2 levels between 1.4 percent and 3.2 percent—well above any of these thresholds. What’s more, “Testes metabolism and cell respiration have been shown to be inhibited increasingly by rising levels of CO2.”

High blood pressure, reduced thinking ability, respiratory problems, and reproductive concerns are among the many possible results of effectively poisoning oneself by breathing in too much carbon dioxide. It is reported that “it is clear that carbon dioxide rebreathing, especially when using N95 masks, is above the 0.8% CO2 limit set by the US Navy to reduce the risk of stillbirths and birth defects on submarines with female personnel who may be pregnant.” In other words, mandates have forced pregnant women to wear masks resulting in levels of CO2 inhalation that would be prohibited if they were serving on a Navy submarine.

There exists “circumstantial evidence that popular mask use  may be related to the significant rise of 28% to 33% stillbirths worldwide. Also that of reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance of two full standard deviations in scores in children born during the pandemic.” Citing recent data from Australia which shows  that ‘lockdown restrictions and other measures (including masks that have been mandatory in Australia), in the absence of high rates of COVID-19 disease, were associated with a significant increase in stillborn births.” Meantime, “no increased risk of stillbirths was observed in Sweden,” which famously defied the public-health cabal and went its own way in setting Covid policies.

As for countries where mask-wearing has long been common, the authors write, “Even before the pandemic, in Asia the stillbirth rates have been significantly higher” than in Eurasia, Oceania, or North Africa. It has been also pointed out that this data has been known for 6o years. This is why the authors of this report write for the ‘Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)’, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has CO2 threshold limits of 3 percent for 15 minutes and 0.5 percent for eight hours in workplace ambient air. Yet the CDC has been perhaps the primary pusher of masks in the United States.

The study focused only on CO2, but the authors note that “other noxious agents in the masks contribute to toxicological long-term effects like the inhalation of synthetic microfibers, carcinogenic compounds and volatile organic compounds.” They add that “the increased carbon dioxide content of the breathing air behind the mask may also lead to a displacement of oxygen.” Masks are also uncomfortable and unhygienic, and they profoundly compromise human social interaction.

Lets not forget how people catch viruses though their eyes and that’s a fact.

In light of all this, it seems indefensible to mandate—or even to advise—the wearing of masks, especially among the young. The authors write, “Keeping in mind the weak antiviral mask efficacy, the general trend of forcing mask mandates even for the vulnerable subgroups is not based on sound scientific evidence and not in line with the obligation in particular to protect born or unborn children from potential harmful influences.”

Public-health officials—and the executive-branch leaders who credulously listened to them—ignored centuries of Western norms, the best medical evidence, and common sense, deciding that their own novel and evidence-free course was the one that all of society should be forced to follow. We should never again indulge such an obvious and destructive misstep.

This Report was published by Jeffrey H. Anderson is president of the American Main Street Initiative, a think tank for everyday Americans. He served as director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics at the U.S. Department of Justice from 2017 to 2021.

Researched By Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-harm-caused-by-masks

A GLOBAL TRADE EMBARGO ON NEW ZEALAND FOR NON COMPLIANCY TO KIGALI AND THE ETS SCHEME. ALL POLITICAL PARTIES LOCKED INTO UN INTERNATIONAL BINDING AGREEMENTS.

Did this ruin NZ’s Clean Green Non- Corrupt image – recommendation.??

NZ Herald 27^th September 2023 was headed ‘Election 2023: How do we tackle Climate Change?. National, Labour, Act, Greens, Te Pati Maori and NZ First Policies. NZ Zero Carbon Act, mandated emissions budget, reduction plan, NZ legislative architecture to force net emission down to zero by 2050. But political parties widely varying their positions on how to meet climate commitment. A large looming headache referring to agricultural emissions.

Where farmers pay for biogenic methane emissions, it appears Labour, National, Act, Greens, Te Pati Maori all  legally bound by the Kigali Amendment 2016 of the UN Montreal Protocol. That has International enforcement laws if NZ Govt does not comply. 21/12/2019 NZ Law changed to reflect the Kigali Amendment. The NZ Emissions Trading Scheme. At a huge cost to consumers worldwide.

4/11/2021 Reform of the NZ Emissions Trading Scheme, a key policy to reduce emissions ensures NZs commitment to Paris Agreement. Non compliancy to Kigali Amendment of the Montreal Protocol means a global trades embargo on NZ. There have been many articles, reports published alleging that the Emissions Trading Scheme is a sham, a fraud, a hoax. The Great Cash For Carbon Hustle’ a fix for runaway emissions, one which does nothing to reduce emissions hence its all down to book-keeping.

It was reported that in one notorious case the Vatican was presented with ‘carbon offset certificates’ for millions of trees that were never planed in 2019 by Yale Climate Connection. The Arab News 15^th March 2023 refers to an investigation by European and British Media, The Guardian and the German Weekly and other media referencing that ‘in January 2023. They concluded gaping holes in the program of carbon offsets used by the worlds leading carbon certifier, 90% of the company’s rainforest offset credits did not represent genuine carbon reductions.

Corporations are accused of cheating and lying as to their carbon offsets and carbon trading. The  Emissions Trading System being without checks and balances, just a matter of book-keeping. Where big industries turn activities around the book-keeping of carbon offsets and trading into another revenue stream, with an extensive stock -market of carbon trading. No checks whatsoever, with billions of dollars of trading invested in offset programs. Being called a Global Climate Fraud.

10/11/2021 Greenpeace reported the ‘carbon offset’ scheme is a scam, a scammers dream. A book-keeping trick. Suddenly carbon trading, carbon offsets are everywhere, carbon foot print measuring for individuals and team player through Auckland Council online ‘FutureFit’. However in reality does this even change the climate, global boiling? It allows businesses to pollute waterways, break trade waste water regulations and the ETS appears to be great for profits. Let’s talk, NZ Government, their history on being the worst climate cheats in the world as they knowingly purchased Ukraine and Russian fraudulent Carbon Credits (Morgan Foundation Report).

The Government was accused of totally irresponsible alleged criminal behavior..It was reported the Government did this to meet their  International commitments for the 2020 emissions of the Kyoto Agreement. NZ being a willing participant in wholesale climate fraud. Reference was made to ‘Hot Air’ climate units, because they did not represent true emissions reductions (they were nothing but hot air). This being an alleged deliberate decision making by the National led government of the day, to continue to allow unlimited used of these foreign fraudulent carbon units for as long as the International community would allow it.

Thus tainting NZ reputation for being a ‘Clean, Green Corrupt Free Country’. Almost $200 million dollars of NZ taxpayer money was put into the hands of these foreign crims. When the Morgan Reports (1 and 2) were published this made many in the community aware of how criminally the NZ Govt had behaved.

Hence it was suggested that the Govt had three options to deal with their criminal fraudulent behavior as climate crim’s to hold their reputation intact.

1)DUMP THE JUNK: Cancel the fraudulent foreign credits 

(2) BURN THE BANK: Remove the Government’s 2 for 1 deal and freeze companies free allocation of the 2 for 1 deal

(3) KEEP IT CLEAN: Keep the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) closed to International trade until NZ Government could be certain NZ’s ETS scheme has ‘integrity’

Also it was suggested that “in the mean-time work closely with some of NZ’s Pacific neighbors to develop bilateral arrangements. 18/4/ 2016 The Morgan Foundation launched a second report also called ‘Climate Cheats’ showing NZ was by far the biggest buyer of the fraudulent foreign carbon credits. The Climate Cheats Report entitled ‘The Dozen Dirty Businesses’ were exposed, where NZ Govt handed over these fraudulent carbon credits to businesses,  dumping the ‘junk credits’.

NZ was the only country in the world that allowed the use of these fraudulent foreign credits between 2013-2015.

Large businesses in NZ were known to profit from the fraudulent credits by selling or banking them, by profiting from pollution. NZ Steel was one, others were Power and Petrol companies led by BP included Caltex and Genesis the Power Company, they were the biggest users of the fraudulent Ukraine, Russian Carbon credits.

MOBILE OIL DID NOT PARTICIPATE, BUT REMAINED STILL REMAINED COMPETITIVE. Some Forestry Companies also purchased these foreign units, but their names were not exposed. The Spinoff News NZ reported 18^th April 2016 ‘Ukraine and Russia had found loopholes in the International Rules for Carbon Trading. NZ is complicit in a ‘climate swindle’. A willing participant in ‘wholesale climate fraud’

That Europe and New Zealand had been increasingly suspicious of Ukraine and Soviet Union, as to what they were up to in 2012. NZ Government had made noises about this at this time, about banning the ‘dodgy climate credits in April 2012. It was reported that in 2012 that backroom negotiations between the National Party and its coalition Party ACT were hesitant about the foreign fraudulent carbon units, however in July 2012 they decided to leave the dodgy carbon foreign units remaining open, instead of immediately halting this climate criminality.

Other countries had walked away from the foreign carbon fraudulent credits, but NZ Government decided not to do so. It was said that ‘NZ ETS Scheme should reflect the ‘International Price’ of carbon offset purchasing and carbon  trading. By the beginning of 2013 Europe had totally banned the trade of these foreign fraudulent carbon units from Russia and Ukraine, leaving New Zealand still purchasing them at a very cheap price. NZ rapidly became the largest consumer of the fraudulent foreign carbon credits in the world.

Over a ¼ of  All NZ’s carbon emissions between 2008-2012 were covered by fraudulent carbon units. 99% of all carbon credits came from Russia and Ukraine. In 2015 the Stockholm Environment Institute found that 89% of Ukraine projects were of ‘questionable or low environmental integrity’ In other words as ‘dodgy as hell’

However NZ Tax Payers were robbed of approx. $200 million to put in the hands of these crim’s thanks to the NZ Govt. The NZ Government most certainly knew these were fraudulent credits and they were an accomplice to a climate crime at the expense of the NZ Taxpayers. At the time the 2^nd Morgan Foundation Climate Cheats report was published  in 2016 it was alleged the NZ Government were still holding up these fraudulent credits as proof they were meeting International emissions targets.

Stuff NZ reported 18^th April 2016. NZ Government allowed ‘Climate Fraud’ to reach emission reduction target. A damming environmental report. Stating the Morgan Foundation Report raised concerns on NZ’s use of the fraudulent foreign carbon credits referring to the NZ Govt reaching it 2020 International Emission targets, which was said to damage NZ’s reputation.

After the publications of the Morgan Foundation Reports Labours David Parker said “the Labour party had been calling the government to close down overseas ‘hot air’ carbon credits from the likes of Ukraine and Russia. (Therefore Labour also were well aware of the fraudulent carbon credits and were also a party to the climate crime)

National Party Paul Bennet Climate Minister said the ETS Scheme is not perfect, but NZ made the best decisions at the time”. Greenpeace NZ Climate Campaigners reported that “ NZ has continued to use the fraudulent climate credits at the time of Paul Bennetts and Parkers responses in 2016.

He also added that “the ETS scheme was a policy that was purposely made to sound boring and dense so people would not dig deeper into it”. In reality the ETS Scheme allows for businesses to make profits from pollution. The whole of the National led government of the time were aware of the climate crime it was committing. They were all aware of the fraudulent criminal behavior of Russia and Ukraine and the carbon credit fraud. As other countries backed away. Europe banned the purchasing use of these fraudulent carbon credits the whole of NZ Government led by National and its coalition partner ACT Party. All political party in government were guilty of this climate crime at this time.

HOWEVER-THERE IS A HUGE RISK OF  A GLOBAL TRADE EMBARGO ON NEW ZEALAND FOR NON COMPLIANCY TO KIGALI AND THE ETS SCHEME. ALL POLITICAL PARTIES LOCKED INTO UN INTERNATIONAL BINDING AGREEMENTS.

NZ AS A NATION NEEDS TO ASK ITSELF “ IS IT TIME TO SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH AND WITHDRAW FROM THE UN GLOBAL AGENDA OF COMMUNIST DEGROWTH AND THE TYRANNY OF HUMAN RIGHTS. WHERE YOU ARE CHARACTER ASSASINATED AS A CLIMATE SKEPTIC, DISCRIMINATED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE GOVT ITSELF. Researched By Carol Sakey https://wakeupnz.org Climatecheat-Report9.pdf   https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/18-04-2016/dodgy-deals-with-climate-fraudsters-nzs-role-in-the-junk-cardon-scam   https://morganfoundation.org.nz/new-report-climate-cheats/

https://www.arabnews.com/node/2269376

Please click on the link for my video for information on this.

WakeUp NZ

Carol Sakey