The Godless ‘Black Book of Communism’ the evil ideology hatched by Karl Marx with his ‘Communist Manifesto’. Before he authored this he was writing about hell. In 1827 he wrote this poem:- “Thus heaven I’ve forfeited, I know it full well. My soul once true to God has chosen hell”. Marxism consigned to death more than 100 million souls in the 20th Century only. Marxism and it’s Godless roots of Socialism. Marx was fascinated with the devil.

Engel’s  yet another famous Marxist, together with Karl Marx they developed a body of ideas critiques of political economical and philosophical theory namely ‘Scientific Socialism’ one which favours Communism, Socialism and a Multi-stakeholder economy over a ‘Free-market Enterprise economy. known as ‘Marxism’  Marxian Socialism .  Hence favouring Communism & Socialism, a global, regional and national economic market of ‘Multistakeholderism’  over that of ‘Free-market Enterprise. A ‘Free-market Enterprise results in competition, lowering prices for consumers, people benefit from a higher standard of living. Countries have  the principles of Free-market Enterprise worldwide. Multistakeholderism  (Globalized Marxian Socialism)

In 2009 the WEF convened an ‘International Group’ meeting to formulate a new system of global governance. The meeting was led by  Klaus Schwab, Mark Malloch Brown and Richard Samans. Together they designed the  ‘Global Redesign Initiative’ (GRI). A system of ‘Multi-stakeholder Governance’.  In March 2019 a meeting was convened by the  Transnational Institute in Amsterdam which included -practitioners, researchers, activists  to critically examine, discuss in depth ‘multi-stakeholder governance’

2019 the UN announced they were unlikely to meet their set target to achieve UN Agenda SDGs by year 2030.  The Global Order was struggling hence a massive plan was made between the UN and WEF. Hence on the 13th June 2019 The WEF and UN signed a strategic official partnership the goal being to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 in a timely manner.  Sustainability hence became the global marketing advertising strategy. This was called  a ‘Narrow Window of Opportunity’ and ‘We Must Act Now’. There massive would include everyone-everywhere at every age of this planet, no-one was to be left behind.

Prior to the pandemic in 2019 IA2030-was introduced. ‘The Global Strategy of Vaccines’. (The Decade of Action). Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The  Gates Foundation supported the ‘Alliance of Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI),  all part and parcel of the new restructured ‘Global Order’- A ‘Global One World Public-Private Corporate Partnership’.  Included in this global one world aggressive determination to control people, planet for huge profit for a few wealthy billionaires. This globally promoted genderism being entrenched in Marxism- Socialism.  Self-interested parties found justification to enter genderism into  ‘economics, environment, politics, society and into the education curriculum. These global social changes are seeking to achieve a ‘universal citizenship’ New forms of citizenship status for  lesbian, bisexual, transgender and binary (LGBT) people globally

Under the veil of COVID19 you would have heard  “No-one is safe until all of us are safe’ these words have accompanied racial issues, ethnicity, age, occupation and gender . ‘Build Back Better’ its said will ‘accelerate gender equality’.  International Women’s Day Magazine ‘Make women the Decision Makers’-Launching ‘Gender Equal Cities’

Nationalism is under attack it is seen as a threat, intertwined within a patriarchal framework,-that exists within a sovereign nation  (references to  ’The Image of Man’ (Elias 2008) and ‘The Creation of Modern Masculinity’ (Mosse 1996)-Good modern man being co-opted into nationalism..  That nationalism relies on masculine technologies.

The Great Reset, The New Normal and The New Green Deal all embedded with Genderism.  ‘A Gender Transformative European Green Deal’, ‘Gender Equality and Climate Change’. UN Agenda 2030 SDGs include ‘Gender Equality’. Strengthening the development, awareness of ‘gender’.

The World Bank (2015) is contributing to the effort to reduce gender inequalities and UNESCO reiterates ‘gender transformative ‘policies. Advancing towards gender mainstreaming in water resources (Three Waters Reform)

He Puapua, every  New Zealander’s life to be impacted by UNDRIP  already being enacted out by the establishing of the Maori Health Authority.  15th January 2014 UNDRIP international gathering at the UN New York, the theme of the meeting being ‘UN Native Youth Sexual Health Network  included on the agenda- ‘Justice over our bodies goes beyond sexual health it is also a myriad of expressions of self-determination over our bodies’ (Indigenous Youth).  UNDRIP includes ‘Sexuality Wheel’ depicting, comprehending the concept of  ‘Sexuality’ as ‘Indigenous Two Spirit, LGBTTQQIA’ The UN states “While the UNDRIP does not explicitly name sexual and gender identities, the right to self determine sexual and gender identities are reinforced in the UNDRIP”

Jacinda Ardern was a guest speaker at a  gathering hosted by Melinda and Bill Gates, Ardern  boasted she was entering UN Agenda 2030 into NZ Domestic policies and that other countries should take her lead.. ‘LGBTQ  in included in UN Agenda 2030 SDG’s’ hence linkages between.   LGBTQ Inclusion and UN Agenda 2030.in the COVID19 Era. This Report is  SDG’s and LGBT’s that support business action.  LGBTQ has also be tagged onto COVID19 Response. UN Women’s Division ‘Beyond COVID19 Report’ determines a ‘Feminist Plan’ for Sustainability to Social Justice which includes- ‘Universal Gender Responsive Social Protection Systems’ hence advancing pathways to ‘Building Back Better’-

‘Transitions to a Gendered Sustainable Future-Systemic Crises’ plus ‘Gender and the Environment’. Enables a ‘Permissive Multilateral Approach ‘ to ‘Global Macroeconomic Governance’ The key levers to a ‘Green Gender’-A Equitable COVID Recovery.  Reinvigorating democracies powered by Feminist Politics. ‘Politics for Transformative Change’.  Diverse Feminist Movements. A ‘Global Feminist Social Contract’, imperative for Transformative Change. The Empowerment of Women and Girls- promote decreasing fertility rates world wide, strengthen and expand women into the workplace, to rapidly decrease fertility rates, population.(Marxist-Socialist Theory)

Genderism is  deeply embedded in the International Labour Org.,(ILO) which was established in 1919, became an agency of the UN when it was founded in 1945. Both the ILO and UN  have promoted depopulation globally over decades. The UN Population Div., produces datasets, selected indicators to measure fertility level tends world wide, linking population increase  and decrease to social, economic development and environmental change. (Malthusian Marxist Socialism). . Famous Socialist Marxist Paul Ehrlich a  Professor at Stanford University authored an Educational Textbook in 1968 ‘The Population Bomb’.. It was written using a’ Malthusian Socialist Marxist theory’.  Accessing consumption vs population levels. Ehrlich made suggested solutions for example   ‘ putting sterilant into food and water as a temporary measure’, .also that America should take the leading role in establishing population control as the US has prominence of the international stage.

Ehrlich’s book ‘The Population Bomb’ bludgeoned  global audiences with fear.  The Director of the Sierra Club -the oldest largest environmental organization in the world, suggested using  the book as a marketing strategy. In the last few decades concerns have shifted from rapid increased population to lowering fertility rates.

The UN Population Replacement Level Rate in 2.1, New Zealand sits on 1.6 and is likely to further decrease even further . Of course there is a pre-planned strategy to close the population replacement gap.. Is this the pre-planned solution? The Global Mayors Conventions discussed ‘Nationalism’ and the planning for many more ‘Smart Cities’ globally. The UN Assembly had already announced that ‘Nationalism is a threat to Multilateralism (Globalization). Could the plan be ‘kill two birds with one stone -Filling the Population Gap  and  targeting Nationalism.  These are the solutions discussed  (1) Fill the population gap by expanding  International and National Migration into Urban/City highly populated condensed areas ‘Smart Cities’  Target Nationalism by saturating NZ with 3rd world migrants hence replace Nationalism with Globalisation.

To achieve UN Agenda 2030 SDGs the global population rate is set at 8.5 billion by year 2030. The Global Development Goals include ‘Reproductive Health’.- Note:-Reproductive Health includes family planning, sterilization, abortions, LGBTQ surgeries and medications to limit fertility levels etc. The SDG’s include ‘expanding and promoting Gender Equality, Empowerment of Women and Girls hence decreasing  fertility level rates(Population Control-Globalised Socialism)

Since the establishment of the International Labour Org (1919) gender issues have been included. Since the establishment of the UN (1945) they have continuously promoted the decline of worldwide population rates, have monitored fertility level rates globally. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the oldest agency of the UN  adopted ‘Declaration of  Philadelphia in 1919  -The Global Fight for Gender Justice. ILO and UN Agencies are entrenched in Socialism.  The ILO, UN Agencies are entrenched in Marxism and Socialism. The ILO has a membership of 187 UN Member Nation States.  Could this be the reason there is no political opposition to the Labour Party in the stinky political toilet bowl in Wellington?

In the mid 1970’s the ILO and UN held  Global Women Conferences  in Beijing 1995 and another in 2013 in Mexico, these included transnational  legal encasements for a change in gender roles, interested gendered movements jumped on the bandwagon.   The UN called for  Global  Systemic Change to support Inter Sexual, Binary, Trans-sexual and  many more genders to Global Politics. Collaborating political, economical social and cultural rights and  progressive alliances for environmental sustainability, y namely radical  Eco-Feminism. Eco Feminism, Eco Churches that over emphasize the escalation of crises events:- Climate Alarmism and Future Pandemics also intertwining LGBTQ with  ‘renewable energy, sustainable agribusiness  and opposition to  Conservatism and Christianity. (Nationalism)

UN Women’s Division action plan is to transform the global economy, steer it towards gender equality for social justice and sustainability. Enabling a gendered environment based on reinforcing of financing, partnerships also including  computer data modelling as an evidence base which gives  justification for gendered actions. These will incorporate standards that will require enforceable actions if not complied to.  Many UN Member Nations already supportive of this..

LGBTQ movements have vested interests in  Socialist driven Trade Unions, alliances and coalitions, environmental groups they also infiltrate farmers groups and Religious Groups   NZ Trade Unions are pro NZ Govts Fair Pay Agreement that could further destroy businesses. Council Of Trade Union has a history of Socialist Marxism Communism

The UN Women’s  Division’s Feminist Plan includes expanding,  mobilizing  transformation LGBTQ as a broad global agenda. To achieve this  they must fill the evidence gaps in the global metric digital modelling system to strengthen  gender biases into data.

A foreign policy columnist wrote an article in the FP New ‘VOICE’ entitled “You Can’t Defeat Nationalism, so stop Trying article dated 4th June 2019. The most powerful force in the world is ‘nationalism’, a desire to gain national autonomy which drove Britain to leave the European Union. References made to Trump’s ‘Making America Great Again’.

Nationalism is central to China’s President Xi Ping. The UN is very fearful of uprising worldwide of Christian and Conservative national groups that are advancing National Sovereignty worldwide. When the  UN announced that Nationalism is the rising threat to Multilateralism, Donald Trump responded by saying that US taxpayers are the largest contributors  to the UN.

Russia’s UN Representative to the UN responded by cautioned powerful UN Member States not to use their dominance to behave in such a way. He also added that NATO was emphasizing alliance mind sets of catastrophic principles.  Antonio Guterres Secretary General of the UN  pointed out the importance of multilateralism.  NOTE: The key inclusions includes women and girls to enhance, accelerate UN Agenda 2030 SDGS and Targets.

So why is Nationalism such a threat to the UN? Perhaps its because human beings are social animals, we are born to be social beings from the moment we are born. Within our national communities we identify with in groups and out groups.  We have a common language and traditions, cultures which are unique identities. We are loyal to our country, and we honour, respect those that fought in terrible wars so we the citizens of NZ can have our freedoms.  This has become hugely evident that solidarity and loyalty exists during times of crisis. (COVID19 )  There are many loyal courageous  New Zealanders that are willing to stand up publicly for NZ, some willing to make sacrifices for our country.

Countries that have a more unified economies are more productive populations. Populations that stick together, survive together. Where there is a lack of Nationalism a country is at risk of being controlled by a tyrannous regime, an authoritative state especially in a ‘Free- market Enterprise Economy

Nationalism is still a powerful force to be  reckoned with, never doubt it. Yes, there is a huge attempt to plunder New Zealand and Sovereign Nations worldwide by this  Globalized Elitist Leftist Socialist Order that has been aggressively ushered in.

Ardern’s government is immoral, evil and reckless with the way they are treating New Zealanders lives. Sadly I say, many Kiwi’s believe they are good people because they are obedient to the government because they make the rules, and rules must be obeyed. We must awaken their ‘moral courage’ rip off the wool that covers those sheep’s eyes.

I personally believe, have  faith that many more Kiwi sheep will awaken -I pray it will be rather sooner than later. Remember that ‘Nationalism’ comprises of a MASSIVE POWERFUL FORCE that even frightens  the UN One World Global Government and the Wealthy Global Elite of the World Economic Forum.

Have faith, take the high road have ‘moral courage’ and in God’s name we can defeat the Godless. We have the strength of a number 8 wire. We stand in the memory of the war dead those that courageously fought for our freedoms and we will not let them die in vein

I leave you with this message:- When Hope knocks on your Door, let Faith answer it. God Bless.

NOTE: RESEARCH PRODUCED BY Carol Sakey

FACEBOOK PAGE: Carol Sakey.  FACEBOOK GROUP” WakeUpNZ

WEBSITE;   https://wakeupnz.org

The Ignored Pandemic: 360 Million Christians Persecuted Worldwide

A GLOBAL PANDEMIC THAT IS IGNORED:- 360 Million Christians Persecuted Worldwide. Reported February 13th 2022 by The Gladstone Institute International Policy Council  the persecution of Christians, which was already horrific, has increased by nearly 70% over the last five years, with no signs of abating. How long will it be before this seemingly irreversible trend metastasizes into those nations currently celebrated for their religious freedom?

The year 2021 “saw the worst persecution of Christians in history” — with an average of 16 Christians murdered for their faith every day.

That observation comes from the World Watch List-2022 (WWL-2022), recently published by the international humanitarian organization, Open Doors. The report each year ranks the top 50 countries where Christians are most persecuted for their faith. The WWL uses data from field workers and external experts to quantify and analyze persecution worldwide.

According to the WWL-2022, covering October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021:

Over 360 million Christians suffer high levels of persecution and discrimination for their faith—a rise of 20 million from last year. The number represents one in seven Christians worldwide. This year records the highest levels of persecution since the first list was published 29 years ago…”

For the same reporting period, 5,898 Christians were murdered “for their faith,” a number representing a 24% increase from 2021 (when “only” 4,761 Christians were killed). Additionally, “6,175 believers [were] detained without trial, arrested, sentenced or imprisoned,” and 3,829 abducted.

Perhaps even more reflective of the hate for Christianity, 5,110 churches and other Christian buildings (schools, monasteries, etc.), were attacked and profaned.

Crunching these numbers into daily averages, the above statistics mean that every day around the world, more than 16 Christians were murdered for their faith; 27 were either illegally arrested and imprisoned by non-Christian authorities or abducted by non-Christian actors; and 14 churches were destroyed or desecrated.

For the first time since these WWL reports were published, Afghanistan, which for years was usually ranked the #2 worst nation (after North Korea) shot up to the #1 spot, meaning “Afghanistan is now the most dangerous place in the world to be a Christian.” Additionally:

Christian men are facing almost certain death if their faith is discovered.  Women and girls may escape death but may be married to young Taliban fighters who want the “spoils of war.” After women and girls are raped, they are trafficked.

The incoming Taliban regime gained access to recordings and reports that helped to identify Christians. They were often detained, in order to identify networks of Christians, before being killed. Taliban fighters are still actively tracking down Christians from existing intelligence, sometimes going door-to-door to find them.

Ten other nations, after Afghanistan, received the same designation of “extreme persecution.” It means that these places, for Christians, are only marginally safer. They are: North Korea (#2), Somalia (#3), Libya (#4), Yemen (#5), Eritrea (#6), Nigeria (#7), Pakistan (#8), Iran (#9), India (#10), and Saudi Arabia (#11). In these countries, Christians face persecution ranging from being harassed, beaten, raped, imprisoned or slaughtered merely for being identified as a Christian or attending church.

Notably, the “extreme persecution” meted out to Christians in nine of these top 11 worst nations comes either from Islamic oppression or takes place in Muslim-majority nations. This trend affects the entire list: the persecution that Christians experience in 39 of the 50 nations on the list also comes either from Islamic oppression or occurs in Muslim majority nations. The overwhelming majority of these nations are governed by some form of shari’a (Islamic law). It can either be directly enforced by government or society or, more frequently, both, although societies — family members outraged in particular by relatives who have converted — tend to be more zealous in its application.

In a section titled, “Emboldened: The ‘Talibanization of West Africa and beyond,” the report suggests that this trend is worsening: “[T]he fall of Kabul has fuelled [sic] a new mood of invulnerability among other jihadist groups worldwide. The groups believe that they won’t face serious opposition from the West for their expansionist agendas and are exploiting nations with weak or corrupt governments…. Sub-Saharan Africa, already the place where violence against Christians is highest, has faced further steep rises in jihadist violence, with fears that a significant part of the region faces destabilization….”

In another section, the report elaborates:

“In Nigeria and Cameroon, Boko Haram continues to wreak havoc, the Islamic State group is active in West Africa and Mozambique, and al Shabab controls large portions of Somalia. It seems like nothing can be done to stop the advance of Islamic extremism.

“We know what radical Islamic ideology looks like for believers because we’ve seen it in Iraq and Syria. When ISIS took over parts of the Middle East, Christians were executed, abducted, sexually assaulted and hunted. Where groups like Boko Haram and al Shabab are active, similar threats are inevitable. When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, they tried to appear moderate—but there’s no sign that Christianity will be anything other than a death sentence.”

Although Islam continues to have the lions’ share of persecution, religious nationalism in non-Muslim nations is also causing them to rise in the ranks. In Myanmar (#12),

“Converts to Christianity … find themselves persecuted by their Buddhist, Muslim or tribal families and communities because they have left their former faith and have thereby removed themselves from community life. Communities who aim to stay ‘Buddhist only’ make life for Christian families impossible by not allowing them to use neighborhood water resources.”

Rising Hindu nationalism has catapulted India into #10, among the “extreme persecuting” nations:

“The persecution of Christians in India has intensified, as Hindu extremists aim to cleanse the country of their presence and influence. The extremists disregard Indian Christians and other religious minorities as true Indians, and think the country should be purified of non-Hindus. This has led to a systemic—and often violent—targeting of Christians and other religious minorities, including use of social media to spread disinformation and stir up hatred. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered a new weapon to persecutors. In some areas, Christians have been deliberately overlooked in the local distribution of government aid and have even been accused of spreading the virus.”

Several other nations have, one way or another, exploited COVID-19 to discriminate against or persecute Christians. For example, “COVID-19 gave Chinese authorities (#17) a reason to shut down many churches—and keep them shut.”

Similarly, in Qatar, “Violence against Christians rose sharply because many churches were forced to stay closed after COVID-19 restrictions.” Moreover, Qatar—”host for this year’s World Cup, where converts from Islam especially face physical, psychological and (for women) sexual violence”—jumped 11 spots (now #18, from #29 last year).

In Bangladesh (#29), local authorities told Muslim converts to Christianity who, like their Muslim counterparts, sought governmental aid, “to return to Islam or receive nothing.” As one Bangladeshi explained, “We see many villagers and neighbours receive relief aid from government support but we Christians do not get any support.”

In the Central African Republic, which was “hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic … Christians were denied government aid and told to convert to Islam if they wanted to eat.”

Another notable trend concerns the growing number of internally or externally displaced people — 84 million: “a significant number [of whom] are Christians fleeing religious persecution.” Those Christians that end up as refugees in neighbouring Muslim nations “can be denied humanitarian and other practical assistance by authorities.”

Additionally:- “Christian women fleeing their homes and seeking safety report sexual assault to be the leading source of persecution, with multiple reports of women and children subjected to rape, sexual slavery, and more, both in camps and while they journey in search of safety. Poverty and insecurity compound their vulnerability, with some drawn into prostitution to survive. As jihadism spreads and destabilizes nations, we can expect this Christian exodus to multiply further.”

Although the report is limited to the 50 worst persecuting nations, it appears that persecution in general is growing around the world. For example, although North Korea is now ranked #2, as a reflection of how bad matters have gotten overall, the report explains that “The persecution score for North Korea actually went up [compared to last year], even though its ranking went down.”

Similarly, hate crimes against Christianity in Western Europe are at an all-time high. According to a November 16, 2021 report by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at least a quarter, though arguably much more, of all hate crimes registered in Europe in 2020 were anti-Christian — representing a 70% increase compared to 2019. Christianity is, furthermore, the religion most targeted in hate crimes, with Judaism at a close second. There are, however, significantly fewer Jews worldwide (roughly 15 million) than Christians (2.8 billion.

Although media outlets rarely identify those behind these anti-Christian hate crimes, many of which revolve around the vandalism of churches, it is telling that the European nations suffering the most also happen to have Europe’s largest Muslim populations — namely, Germany (where anti-Christian hate crimes have more than doubled since 2019) and France (where two churches are reportedly attacked every day, some, as in the Muslim world, with human feces).

As a reflection of how bad persecution has gotten elsewhere around the globe, no Western European nation made the top 50 list.

In the end, perhaps the most disturbing trend is that the number of persecuted Christians continues to grow annually. As seen, according to the newest statistics, 360 million Christians around the world are experiencing “high levels of persecution and discrimination.” This represents a 6% increase from 2021, when 340 million Christians experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 31 % increase from 2020, when 260 million Christians experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 6% increase from 2019, when 245 million experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 14% increase from 2018, when 215 million was the number

In short, the persecution of Christians, which was already horrific, has increased by nearly 70% over the last five years, with no signs of abating.  How long will it be before this seemingly irreversible trend metastasizes into those nations currently celebrated for their religious freedom?

Christian Persecution by the Numbers – Open Doors USA – Open Doors USA

The He Puapua Plan is otherwise known as Vision 2040.  The He Puapua Plan relates back to the UN Declaration Rights of Indigenous People introduced in 2007. At this time the  NZ Government was opposed to the UNDRIP. Members of the government reported that the UNDRIP was seen to be inconsistent with NZ’s Constitution, Legal System, Democratic Rights of NZ Citizens.  NZ is one of 148 countries that supported the UNDRIP. UNDRIP is a non-binding agreement, that New Zealand Govt have become committed to.

In 2007 Nanaia Mahuta questioned Art.,19 & 32 of the UNDRIP saying the declaration implied ‘Veto Rights’ of Iwi over the State and Iwi over Private Property Rights (Art 26 & Art 28 UNDRIP)Initially in 2007 Helen Clark said “If New Zealand was to sign the UNDRIP this would cause all sorts of problems” now she promotes supports the He Puapua Plan to embed UNDRIP, a UN Non-Binding agreement into all of NZ society.

2009 under the veil of secrecy Peta Sharples signed the UNDRIP on behalf of the government of the day. Under the veil of secrecy the UNDRIP . In 2009 the National Govt was in power. They had formed an alliance with the Maori party. The Maori Party had been formed in 2004 in response to the foreshore and seabed controversy.

Between 10th December 1999 and 19th November 2008 the Labour Party was in power under Helen Clark. Tariana Turia founded the Maori Party after resigning from Labour. She and Pita Sharples were high profile academics became the first co-leaders of the Maori Party.  Minister for Maori Development, Willie Jackson has announced the next steps for the UNDRIP. A partnership of Crown and Iwi. He was referencing The He Puapua plan established in 2019, which had been kept secret, out of the public eye until 2021. It came to light after an OIA Request. The plan made by Te Puni Koriki.

Stuff NZ reported April 22nd 2022  The Government were told that ‘Co-Governance not enough to satisfy indigenous rights declaration. Willie Jackson said that the government will shape, recognize its obligations under UNDRIP. Saying the Maori Health Authority can be an example for other sectors eg; Justice and Education.

The He Puapua plan was put together by a Declaration Working Group (DWG). They made their final report on 1st November 2019. Ardern was question why she had kept the He Puapua Plan a secret, out of the public’s eye during her electioneering campaign. Her response was  “ Due to the risk, it may be misconstrued as government policy”.But Ardern had already accepted the He Puapua recommendations. The drafting of a plan for ‘Division, Separatism and Apartheid’ However Ardern accepted ‘He Pua Pua Recommendation’. An Iwi political authority over all citizens of New Zealand. A plan where some NZ Citizens will be valued more than others.

He Puapua is defined as ‘The Breaking of The Waves’. Obviously the breaking of society into a separatist state, the breaking of the economu and environmental norms.

Back in 2009 John Key then PM of NZ saw the UNDRIP as ‘Non-binding and just window dressing. Don’t let the wording ‘Non-Binding fool you. Non-Binding eludes to a commitment to follow through. NZ Govt is party to at least 1900 UN Agreements, declarations etc.,  For example the UNDRIP was ‘Non-Binding’ and UN Agenda 2030 was Non-Binding, the UN Global Compact of Migration was Non-Binding, and Winston Peters even went to the Crown Law Office to publicly assure people that it was non-binding before it was agreed to by NZ.

UNDRIP is already being enacted into NZ Policy, we already have the Maori Health Authority for example. UN Global Compact Of Migration of 2018 at a recent UN speech the permanent representative of NZ to the UN reference  NZ borders opening in July 2022 and the UNGCM being part of NZ Policy.

UN Agenda 2030. Bill and Melinda Gates were hosting an event, Jacinda Ardern a guest speaker. Ardern bragged to the audience that under her leadership UN Agenda 2030 17 Global Development Goals, 169 Targets have  been entered into NZ Domestic Policy making. That NZ was the first country globally to do this. Hence all three are binding and lawful in NZ.

Through the He Puapua Plan UNDRIP is planned to be totally embedded into Education, Health, ECONOMY, Environment, the Legal System and Infrastructure.  totally embedded into all NZ Citizens way of life. Health, Education, Economy, Environment, Legal System, Infrastructure etc., etc.,  Hence the cherry picked compulsory teaching of Maori history in NZ Schools and Maori language.  All part and parcel of the UNDRIP-He Puapua, Vision 2040 Plan.  He Puapua Plan of Te Puni Koriki  is composed of 123 pages of commitments to the UNDRIP, a heavy political discourse. Parekura Tureia Horomia (8/11/1950 – 29/4/2013) was born in Tolago Bay, he later became Minister of Maori Affairs between 2000-2008.

He was part of a large family seven brother and sisters. In his early life worked really hard as a manual labourer, then a printer in the newspaper industry. Later he was appointed in supervisory positions. In the 1999 election he stood as a Labour candidate for Rawhiti Electorate. In 2000 Dover Samuels was forced to step down as Minister of Maori Affairs after criminal allegations were made against him. It was then that Horomia took his place as Minister Of Maori Affairs.  Horomia said this about the UNDRIP “It gives recognition of rights to lands lawfully owned by citizens indigenous and other. It ignore reality , it implies indigenous people should have the power of veto over parliamentary law making processes.

He Puapua is the portrayal of NZ Citizens to give control to Iwi Tribal elite over the whole of New Zealand. Nanaia Mahuta had originally said in 2007 opposing the UNDRIP “It is inconsistent with the NZ Constitution, NZ’s legal framework. The UNDRIP would be too difficult to overturn whilst retaining the fabric of NZ Society. Fast forward -she now promotes, supports it. 2019 (source- cabinet minutes). Ardern authorizes Nanaia Mahuta to change the UNDRIP into a plan for implementation- The He Puapua Plan.. All kept silent under the veil of COVID19 and Ardern’s pre-electioneering until 2021.

It was reported that He Puapua is to be compatible with NZ’s legal system, cultural practices within a tribal feudal system and to be introduced into Common Law, to ensure separatism is promoted in New Zealand. He Puapua Plan equates to the total enactment of UNDRIP into all of NZ, as will be the Treaty Of Waitangi. The Treaty Of Waitangi was introduced in New Zealand under the legal system of Common Law. A prominent NZ Judge and Law Lecturer referred to the embedding of UNDRIP and the Treaty Of Waitangi into NZ law saying that “ALL citizens became subjects of the British Queen in Parliament, to enjoy her protection”

Judge Willy is well informed, knowledgeable about the fundamental goal of Marxism. Cultural Marxism appears to be doing very well in New Zealand. Destabilizing democratic rights of NZ Citizens. Leighton Smith interviewed former Judge Willie about the future concerns for democracy in New Zealand. Willy explained “ why incorporating tikanga will make it impossible to maintain common laws of the 21st century in New Zealand is absurd”. He was referring to the He Puapua Plan. He said “To represent pre-European Maori practices as having a place in Common Law is absurd.

That “a law embraces the components of the belief’s of various peoples whom currently make up NZ Society cannot be a law common to all. The law is not concerned with making people feel better about themselves nor more or less valued. That Judges of our Superior courts who tinker with political populist nonsense are playing with fire. They do a great disservice to the law and harmony of society. In reality those seeking to introduce ‘tikanga’ into law are not motivated by public good, they are instead committed to progressing Labour’s agenda to enrich the tribal-elite”

Vision 2040. He Puapua Plan is an enlarged tribal state, dangerously threatens Democratic Rights, Human Rights the very core of our Human Dignity. Human Dignity is the recognition that ALL human beings have a special value intrinsic to their humanity, such are worthy of respect simply because they are human beings. Public debate about He Puapua is very limited as many people fear character assassination, the subject too sensitive, walking on broken glass. May be called racist, white supremacists, far right extremist. Nanaia Mahuta when question why UNDRIP, her response is ‘John Key wanted it”  She wants it even more as does Ardern and her political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington.

13th April 2009. (Centre of Independent Studies) UNDRIP. Reports ‘John Key was caught musing over whether New Zealand would follow Australia in signing the UNDRIP’. The report responded “Lets hope he doesn’t, NZ is already recognized the world leader of Indigenous Rights”.  The UNDRIP simply repeats the rights of  the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) extending them to Indigenous people. Strange because they like us all already are included in the UDHR.

UNDRIP Art., 14.1 states “Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.  Hence NZ Educational system will be entrenched in UNDRIP  Art 6..read:-

“Every Indigenous individual has the right to nationality. “Nations can exist as one with the state (the nation-state), within states, and across states, individuals cannot choose their nationality.. anymore than they can choose their family. There is no such thing as a ‘Nation Passport’, you get a passport for a country. Sometimes a nation is primarily an administrative zone. So this absolutely makes no sense at all.

UNDRIP is about Separatist agenda’s , that has profound , unforeseen consequences. John Key had said that UNDRIP is non-binding, does not supersede NZ law.. Now it is evident that there are serious implications in committing to this non-binding agreement. That is so easily become binding in NZ Law. Phil Goff said “while there is much in the non-binding UNDRIP that Labour can support, other parts go too far.  Goff said “no government will give any group within New Zealand the right to self-government or the power of Veto over the Governments decision making” WRONG. He also said “the National Government has no intention of following through on the UNDRIP goals and requirements therefore they should not sign it”

Vision 2040- He Puapua Plan. When UNDRIP’s roadmap is to be achieved by 2040. This marks the 200th anniversary of the Treaty Of Waitangi. Beaware its already being enacted and introduced in NZ. Judith Collins called it ‘two systems by stealth’.  The reason for all the fuss is the perceived obfuscation of the report – despite being received by then minister for Māori Development, Nanaia Mahuta, in 2019, it hasn’t been released by cabinet and is only circulating now after it was released under OIA last month. Since then, National Party leader Judith Collins has used it to stoke fears over separatism, claiming it will create “two systems by stealth”.

The National Party in 2009 agreed to the UNDRIP, rationalising that its non-binding, it could not undermine any NZ policy or legislation.  WRONG.

Te Puni Koriki recommends among other things :- Maori Court System, Health System. Upper House Parliament, Protection of Maori Seats in Parliament and Maori Wards, Compulsory Maori language and Maori History in Schools, Joint Governance Bodies across ALL Govt Agencies. Strengthening the legal recognition of Te Tiri o Waitangi by entering it into NZ Law

DEFINING INDIGENOUS: ROOT WORD OF INDIGENOUS   The term ‘indigenous  ‘Having originated in and being produced, growing in, occurring in naturally in a particular region or environment. (innate, inborn)  Derived from the latin word ‘indigenus’. Old latin word ‘indu’ meaning ‘in’, ‘within’. ‘gignere’ meaning ‘to beget’ from the root ‘gene’ meaning ‘to produce, give birth, beget’.  The term ‘Indigenous’ is very difficult to define. It’s confusing because most people in the world are “indigenous” to their countries in the sense of having been born in them, being descended from people who were born in them.

‘THEREFORE WE ARE ALL INDIGENOUS PEOPLES.’-LIKE SHEEP THE GOVERNMENT ARE PULLING THE WOOL OVER  MANY NEW ZEALANDER’S EYES.

Telemedicine / Telehealth has accelerated since the intro of COVID19 to New Zealand, this is happening worldwide. Telemedicine is a remote clinical service using telecommunications AI etc. and Telehealth refers to clinical and non clinical services with an opportunity for educating and training of medical personal. This is not new, back on 23rd May 2017 the Ministry of Health documented  ‘telehealth needs fast broadband service, this will make it a fairer system with more educational options for DHB staff. MOH promoting Telehealth into a provision for NZ Healthcare services.

A Telehealth Forum’ was established to advise on many matters including environmental ones which they said were of importance. Collaborations with international health organization took place. MOH referred to ‘Robotics’. The replacement of traditional medical practices of face to face meetings with medical professionals. This being namely the MOH. Uptake of the framework for ‘Sustainable Health NZ. IOT. (All a part of ‘The Internet of things’). Back in 2015 it was reported that NZ Police supported Telehealth for Mental Health in NZ.

Fast forward to 2022 ‘A Free Medical Abortion’ Order an abortion online. Abortion medication sent by post. Devaluing human life itself’. And telehealth is not without risks. It’s impossible to do a physical examination vis ‘telehealth’. And its questionable if a person is in the right frame of mind to describe what they are suffering, therefore risks the medical practitioner getting the diagnosis wrong.

Personal medical records risk being cyber attacked, used for third party purposes criminal or otherwise, if for political purpose. As government COVID restrictions continue telehealth becomes more familiar, normalised and then consequently accepted. (Common practice).  Some call Telehealth/Telemedicine the ‘Pandemic Technology’. Its been in the planning for many years.  In 1997 it was reported that  ‘Telehealth’ has an importance for patients seeking euthanasia, assisted suicide under the  Commonwealth Euthanasia Laws Act 1997.

The US and Canada have no prohibitions and have been using telehealth for euthanasia, assisted suicide. A US citizen Kristen Hanson wrote an article spelling out the dangers of ‘assisted suicide’ by telehealth. Her husband undergoing treatment for terminal cancer, he was tempted to seek assisted suicide but did not.

After his diagnosis and prognosis he lived a further 3 ½ years spent precious time with their children and formed special relationships with his sons. In fact during that time another son was born. In dying their was every reason to celebrate life even in dying. She said that “Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia Laws play on the most vulnerable, further endangers patients”.

She spoke of abusive caregivers, greedy family members wanting to be heirs to the patients fortunes. The removal of the need of patients to meet doctors face to face putting ill patients at further risk. She spoke about coercion, mental abuse leading patients wanting to find a quick way out of here. And the feeling of being a nuisance, under valued and not wanted.

David Seymour’s so called ‘End Of Life Choice Act’, cunningly the word ‘choice was added. When choice is limited by such an authoritarian govt then the word ‘choice ‘ has a greater significance. We all want choice, to choose what we want. But Seymour’s ‘euthanasia, assisted suicide Act’ has very dangerous concepts.  This was made law under the veil of COVID 19 November 2021.

Properly diagnosing a patient as terminal can be very difficult. Many patients have lived much longer even years longer after being told they are terminally ill. I believe that Telehealth has no place for assisted suicide or abortion, it desensitises and devalues human life.

It breaks down safeguards that protect patients overall health and wellbeing.  David Seymour’s law on euthanasia determines that ‘unbearable suffering ‘can be used as an eligibility to receive assisted suicide.  What if a patient seeking assisted suicide does not want to dob his family in, or feels ashamed he/she is being abused, coerced, is pressured.  Seymour’s Act  depicts that at the point of a medical practitioner actioning assisted suicide, no independent witness is present to confirm the patient is of sound mind. An eligible patient can die within 4 days after their diagnosis, prognosis without loved ones even being aware.

48 hrs time frame from writing the prescription for the lethal dose and administering it. It was proposed in Parliament the timeframe be 1 week, it was not even debated. Parliament voted down 2 amendments that required euthanasia to be a last resort for people  where they could not be helped by palliative care.  In Seymour’s Euthanasia Act 2 doctors need to  be involved with the patient seeking an end to their life.  They do not have to be doctors known to the patient or their family. Neither of the doctors need to have training in the area the patient is suffering in. This was not debated in Parliament.

An inexperienced doctor, straight out of medical school  can be involved in the process, therefore risks incorrect diagnosis, prognosis and may not even be aware of alternatives. Parliament voted down an independent witness being present at the time of death, did not debate this.

Only one doctor checks whether the person expresses their own free choice to euthanize without pressure, coercion. This doctor may be inexperienced, fresh out of medical school have provisional registration. Has no idea about the patient and what happens behind his/her closed doors at home. And does not even have to speak with the patient face to face. Neither does the doctor have experienced meeting the patient before. Parliament voted down the amendments to close this gap.

The  Assisted Suicide Act requires the person seeking euthanasia to have a NZ Passport or Permanent Residency Visa. But does not necessarily have to reside in NZ permanently. Parliament did not discuss this as being open to ‘Euthanasia Tourism’. Seymour’s Euthanasia Act became law in November 2021. Another one to add to Ardern’s Death Cult under the veil of COVID19.

With increased suicides in New Zealand what sort of message does this give. It’s legal. Assisted dying, the pitfalls of hastening death. Telehealth however risks missed psychological diagnosis, increases the risk of un necessary requests for euthanasia, assisted suicide.

The Defender’s editor sent an OIA Request for a Ministry Of Health response. “Could a patient who is severely hospitalised with COVID19 potentially be eligible for assisted suicide, if a health practitioner viewed this prognosis as less than 6 months”? MOH replied “ Kiwi’s with COVID19 can be eligible for ‘Euthanasia’ Assisted Suicide”?

The response from MOH was  “A terminal illness is most often a prolonged disease where treatment is not effective. The EOLC Act states ‘eligibility is determined by the attending practitioner (AMP) and the independent medical practitioner”. The Editor of The Defender reported the OIA response from the MOH raises some very serious concerns that (1) There is nothing concrete about the phrase that MOH used ‘most often’, that its inclusion in this specific context suggests that the 4.MOH considers the definition of ‘terminal illness’ to be subjective and open in interpretation

The MOH response also clarifies that the MOH considers the attending medical practitioner (AMP) and the independent practitioner to be empowered by the EOLCA to make the determination of what does, or does not qualify as a terminal illness. And also speaks of how vague the interpretation is. The editor of The Defender said it “feels like New Zealanders are being sold one thing and delivered another”. The Editor also referred to a lady in the States whose husband was diagnosed as terminal, but lived a a further 3 ½ yrs after diagnosis.

How that precious time was spent with their sons. That her husband had seriously thought about seeking assisted suicide, because he did not this meant that they could celebrate life even in dying. Especially with another son being born within those 3 ½ years.

The Editor also referenced a tragic case of an elderly Canadian lady who requested assisted suicide because she could not bear the very thought of going into another COVID19 lockdown.

New Zealanders are going through a massive deceit, a litany of lies, wool pulled over sheep’s eye. With language being purposely softened  for political self interest. Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide MOH calling this ‘Assisted Dying’ And David Seymour purposely adding the word ‘Choice’. Of course we all want choice, especially when freedom of choice is thin on the ground.

Christian morals are being swept away, there appears to be a diminishing line as to what is right and wrong. A destructive force that dehumanises humanity itself. In what is now called ‘Sustainable Healthcare’ which is Telehealth/ Telemedicine, furthering isolation of individuals.

It does not make anyone a good person because they are obedient to an immoral authoritative government. It does not make a person a good person if they are compliant to corruption and immorality, tyranny.

With Telehealth/ Telemedicine this raises huge concerns and risks to our privacy, who is even going to enforce regulation, can they even be enforced. I believe not. As for privacy this is codified in International human Rights, which is non-binding. The  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ratifies the right to privacy, when whoever, where-ever justifies and finds reasons to either compliance or not.

Telehealth seriously risks cyber attacks where personal sensitive data can end up in criminal, political, commercial hands. A typical smart phone, a laptop is not equipped with the proper software to ensure your protected from cyber attacks. Even some software used by Telehealth practitioner for medical consultations including Zoom is at risk.

Zoom  is not end to end encrypted., it lacks essential security. It is open to malicious online crime, unauthorized third parties. Zoom meetings have been hijacked private data of people engaging in telehealth have had their private sensitive information, data stolen.

A landmark judgement as facets of fundamental rights to privacy. Stating that hospitals, doctors, institutions etc., collect vast amount of private personal sensitive information about individuals. Affirming the tremendous scope commercial exploitation  that takes places without a persons consent.

Referring to Telemedicine/ Telehealth opening up the same risks when people consent to give their healthcare provider permission to record sensitive private information during telehealth consultations. That these patients do not give consented to being exploited, have their private lives intruded upon.

‘Sustainable Healthcare- Beyond the Pandemic’ is just that ‘Telehealth/ Telemedicine continued as part of the Internet Of Things and no going back to the traditional way of life.

Telehealth is now  part of the protocol for medical abortion. Medication for abortion up to 12 weeks delivered by post. Family Planning is linked to International Planned Parenthood. Family planning is involved in the sexual education of our children.

International Planned Parenthood in the US are expanding their telehealth/ telemedicine services to 50 states in the US, however Ohio State lawmakers are pushing to ban Telehealth services for Abortion. This is supported by the over-ruling of Wade & Roe in the Supreme Court. 18 states in the US have already now banned telehealth/telemedicine service

Newshub reports that abortions have increased in NZ since Ardern’s decriminalizing the Abortions Act.  Surely with Telemedicine/ Telehealth this must also increase the number of abortions too.

RESEARCHED PRODUCED BY CAROL SAKEY   (WEBSITE –  https://wakeupnz.org  )

https://www.defendnz.co.nz/news-media/2021/12/19/exclusive-euthanasia-expansion-moh-says-kiwis-with-covid-19-can-now-be-eligible

https://www.noeuthanasia.org.au/deadly_mix_of_telehealth_and_euthanasia