Relationship and Sexual Education in the NZ School curriculum (RSE)

Firstly Drag Queen story telling in Council Libraries are funded by you the public of New Zealand. Drag Queens are fetish adult entertainment not children’s entertainment. I cannot understand any parent or think that’s ok. Ratepayers I urge you to hold the CEO of the Auckland City Council to account. Drag Queen Library Story times are doing your child no harm.. He cannot. And if you are a parent taking your child to one of these adult drag queen library story times you need your head read.

 We need to know what’s going on in schools is not an accident this is part of a long cultural Marxism . This needs to be exposed. School boards across the world are trying to cover up what images are being shown to children. This evil monster must be exposed, this is a Marxist programme that been like a frog in a slowly boiling pot, its been going on for decades. This is a purposeful evil using the most vulnerable population we have, our children and young people.

Critical Race Theories, Critical theories are dangerous should not be taught in our schools. This is Cultural Marxism Oppressors Vs Oppressed. Where there is no middle ground. Black and white nothing in between. Just Dogma. The Ministry Of Education Sexuality and Relationship Programmes in NZ Schools. I question are we dealing with con artists, sexual aggressors anti-social predators, sexual groomers-exploiting our most vulnerable -our children. Childhood grooming is the deliberate act of establishing an emotional bond with a child to lower the child’s resistance. An emotional bond where teachers question the young about sexual pleasure, the most intimate details that you would never ask an adult out of due respect. Because they may feel uncomfortable, shamed or even victimized. Therefore our children are being sexually groomed in the classroom. Ask the Education Minister to prove to you that children are not being sexually groomed in the classroom. The Minister of Education cannot prove it. Childhood grooming is a deliberate act to lower a child’s, young persons resistance. That’s childhood sexual abuse.

Childhood Sexual Abuse includes sexual type activities. Which dismantle, destroy family relationships, destabilises childhood innocence. The pushing, crossing of boundaries of childhood innocence. Psychologically, emotionally, spiritually risking physical implications and criminality.

Common Grooming behaviours include: Perpetrators seek to form relationships with children, testing the boundaries of a child’s comfort levels, intimidation, sharing sexually explicit materials, and communicating secretly about sexuality. You as a parent on not a fly on the wall in the classroom, and your child has nowhere to run to whilst in the classroom whilst being coerced, indoctrinated and brainwashed sexually, politically

Classroom subjects such as English, Language, Art, Social Sciences, Maths, Tech etc., are all embedded with Sexuality and Relationship programming. Yes young people and children are being deliberately transitioned sexually, politically. A ‘bone fide grooming’ is taking place throughout NZ schools educational curriculum. It’s not unreasonable to question “are children, young people through the educational curriculum being deliberately primed for sexual abuse?

Catch the children whilst they are young, is this a deliberate societal transition that is intended to become generational. Does this set our children up to becoming abusers themselves, a dreadful thought, but we should think about that. The deliberate exploitation of children endangering them by exposing them to inappropriate content and language.

The eroding of parental rights. The Hilary Clinton ‘The child belongs to the global village’. The lack of visibility for parents to know what is actually going on in the school classroom should be a worry, COVID19 parents not allowed even in the school playground, to pick young children up from the classroom at the end of the day. The Global Village your child belongs to the State. The Cultural Marxist Global Elite. Goal-A Global Communist Governance.

 We should ask for absolute clear evidence children are not being harmed in anyway in the school classroom .That their health and wellbeing is not being endangered .Demand responsible and accountable responses from the Minister Of Education. Jan Tinetti is to be made accountable and responsible, she is the Education Minister.Chris Hipkins was the Minister Of Education when this RSE Cultural Marxism program was introduced into schools. Every decent person should want to protect children and young people from grooming, childhood abuse, sexualization and politicizations that’s happing out of parents sight in the school classroom. The distribution of harmful materials with sexual content, sexual pleasure should be prohibited completely in schools as resource materials and in school libraries. These materials are obscenities can be harmful to minors if they represent sexual conduct, sexual content. That can be offensive to minors, make them feel uncomfortable, emotionally upset, they may even be inclined to isolate themselves emotionally, this may cause psychological anxiety. This is not a time for teachers to delve into a child’s anxiety, discomforts, to do so would be revictimizing them.

Parents the people of New Zealand if you truly care for your children I urge you to stand up against this firewall of cultural Marxist tyranny. The use of their parties as predators within the Ministry Of Education Sexuality Relationship Programme should make you shudder. Under the mask of Bully Programmes in schools the Cultural Marxists introduced the sexualization, politicisation of our children, through Critical theory to destabilise society, to dismantle families.

UNESCO deliberately entrenched schools worldwide with the ‘Pleasure Project’. In sexuality and Relationship programme within the school curriculum, discussions, images as to what sexually pleasures our children our young. That is global sexual abuse. Adopted into schools worldwide, including in NZ Schools. This has been planned for well over a 100 years. The boiling frog was dipped into the cool water, now the water is about to boil. Our generation of children throughout the school system are being deliberately transformed to become the new normal, the victims of a new generational post modernized cultural oppressive  Marxism. The dismantling of the family structure, of Christian beliefs, morality, values of society itself. And they do not care they are children, they are young and vulnerable, that is just why they are targeting our children, our young.

Demand responsible and accountable responses from the Minister Of Education. Jan Tinetti is to be made accountable and responsible, she is the Education Minister.Chris Hipkins was the Minister Of Education when this RSE Cultural Marxism program was introduced into schools. Hipkins long term academic friend of Ardern-Cultural Marxist. The Minister of Education cannot prove it. Childhood grooming is a deliberate act to lower a child’s, young persons resistance. That’s childhood sexual abuse.

CLICK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE THIS WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO

Stuff NZ Report 13th November 2015
The Government is complying with an ultimatum from Iwi leaders to surrender control of the nations water to Maori/Iwi within a year. The government had met Iwi leaders in April 2015 to work out how to manage the surrender.

They decided to hand control to Iwi at regional council level, catchment by catchment, council by council. Fast forward to replacement of the Resource Management Act into three legislations in 2024. Iwi decision making, monitoring, management of freshwater rights and implementing Iwi Rights as agreed upon by Labour and National led Governments

A political think-tank is set to revive the “Iwi-Kiwi” advertising theme to highlight what it claims is a plan to give Maori water rights by stealth. It echoes a notorious 2005 National Party advertisement, during the height of the furore over the foreshore and seabed, which showed National backed “Kiwi” while Labour backed “Iwi” over ownership of the beaches.

Canterbury University Law lecturer David Round, said there was no legal, moral or common sense justification for any Iwi/Maori claim to fresh water.

Iwi Elite in the drivers seat, government is the back seat passenger and the people of NZ are the roadkill. A two tier class society-Cultural Marxism- Identity Politics,

CLICK ON THE IMAGE – A LINK TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO RELATED TO THIS BLOG

MORAL COURAGE: Requires obligation to honour  “what is the right thing to do”? – Danger management “What do I need to handle my fear”?  Expression and action “What action do I need to take to maintain my integrity”?  Sadly I say the masses lack ‘Moral Courage’.

INTEGRITY: Means being honest and having strong moral principles.

ATTRIBUTES OF INTEGRITY:  (1) Dependability, this means people can rely on you and that you keep promises. (2) Loyalty, a strong support or allegiance. (3) Honesty. Integrity itself requires honesty. Honesty is a refusal to lie, steal, deceive in any way.  (4)Good judgement.- is to consider the consequences of ones decisions, thinking before acting and having the tools to make good decisions in various situations.  (5)Respect builds feelings of trust, safety and wellbeing. Being considerate of peoples feelings, self discipline and making responsible choices to reach personal goals. Respect owed morally regardless of social position, individual characteristics or achievements or merit.

COMMON MORALITY: The moral system that thoughtful people use, usually implicitly when they make moral decisions and judgements. The behaviour that affects others.

CARE VS HARM: (a) Fairness vs Cheating,  (b) Behavior must be fair and just.  (c) Liberty vs Oppression.  (d) Tyrannical oppression is wrong.  (e) Loyalty vs Betrayal.  (f) Morality requires faithfulness to a group or another individual.

CONTRA BONOS MORES’:”Our society prohibits, and all human societies have prohibited, certain activities not because they harm others but because they are considered, in the traditional phrase, ‘contra bonos mores,’ i.e., immoral.” -Justice Antonin Scalia

Common law is seen as a system shaped by ‘morality’

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEFINE LAW AND NATURAL LAW: Divine law comes directly from God, whilst Natural law is inherent in human beings. Devine and Natural law are ancient concepts that govern human behaviour.  Human beings possess intrinsic values that govern their reasoning and behaviour

SUBSUMING NATURAL LAW INTO COMMON LAW: Blackstone’s Commentaries served as the primary educational basis for newly emerging proprietary schools and, from 1817, university law schools, such as Harvard’s under the leadership of Joseph Story.

LEGISLATION AND MORALS: But NOT the same circumference. The State puts its own sanction behind moral rules that are enforced by them (Moral vs Immoral). Hence many immoral acts are not illegal eg sexual acts- such as Drag Queen Story Time for children,  and laws that are based on morals, and may be even opposed to morals eg; technical matters, traffic laws etc.,

THE TEST OF LAW: Morals as test of law: several jurists have observed that law must conform to morals, and the law which does not conform to morals must be disobeyed and the government which makes such law should be overthrown. The purpose of the law is do justice.

THEORECTICAL MORALS: The Greeks in the name of the doctrine of natural rights formulated a theoretical moral foundation of law. The Roman jurists in the name of ‘natural law recognised certain moral principles as the basis of law. In the middle Ages, the Church became dominant in Europe. The natural law was given a theological basis and Christian morals were considered as the basis of law.

THE POST REFORMATION OF EUROPE: Modern trends: In the post-Reformation Europe (when the yoke of the Church was thrown off) it was asserted that law and morals are distinct and separate, and law derives its authority from the state and not from the morals.

RELIGION ’MORALS’: Morals have their source in the religion or conscience. However, in the 17th and 18th centuries natural law theories became very popular and, more or less, they had a moral foundation. Law again came to be linked with morals.

THE SOVEREIGN ‘MORALS’:  In the 19th century, Austin propounded his theory that the law has nothing to do with the morals. He defined law as the command of the sovereign. He further said that it was law (command) alone which is subject-matter of jurisprudence. Morals are not a subject-matter of study for jurisprudence.

‘THE STUDY OF LAW ‘MORALS’: In the 20th century, Kelsen said that only the legal norms are the subject-matter of jurisprudence. He excluded all other extraneous things including the morals from the study of law. There is a change in trend of thought in modern times.

THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO LAW ‘MORALS’: The distinction between law and  morals and the forces that influence the development, function and ends of laws studies which extended to various social sciences including morals

THE PRIVY COUNCIL: Decision making always made a distinction between legal and moral injunctions. Law is now being codified.

THE GENIUS OF COMMON LAW: The mix of adaptability and consistency.. When new circumstances arise, common law courts, urged on and educated by the parties to disputes, adapt existing rules in ways that they believe produce the most just and fair outcomes.

COMPARABLE CASES: They look for comparable cases in their own and other jurisdictions to learn what adaptation of existing law will produce the best results. Over time, new doctrines emerge and old ones may die out. But at any given time there is a stable rule‐set people can use to organize their lives and business activities.

COMMON LAW OF PRIVACY:  The ‘Right to Privacy’. Law should explicitly protect privacy. n 1960 eminent legal scholar William L. Prosser documented how privacy as a legal concept had come to constitute four distinct torts: intrusion upon seclusion or solitude, or into private affairs; public disclosure of embarrassing private facts; publicity that places a person in a false light in the public eye; and appropriation of name or likeness. The common law of privacy continues to develop and advance

THE MORAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY:  This is a fundamental right, essential to autonomy and the  protection of human dignity, serving as the foundation upon which many other human rights are built. Thus shields us from the contexts of providing certain freedom and independence- freedom from scrutiny, prejudice, pressure to conform, exploitation, and the judgement of others.

THE INSTRINSIC VALUES ‘MORALS’:  Morals look to the intrinsic value of conduct or in other words, they look into motive. Law is concerned with the conduct of the individual for which it lays down standards.

THE SMOOTH RUNNING OF SOCIETY ‘MORALS’:  Morals are an end in themselves. They should be followed because they are good in themselves. Law is for the purpose of convenience and expediency, and its chief aim is to help a smooth running of the society.

INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE ‘MORALS’: The observance of morals is a matter of individual conscience. Law brings into picture the complete machinery of the state where the individual submits himself to the will of the organised society and is bound to follow its rules.

UNIVERSAL LAW ‘MORALS’: The morals are considered to be of universal value. Law is relative-related to the time and place, and, therefore, it varies from society to society. Law and morals, again, differ in their application. The morals are applied taking into consideration the individual cases whereas the application of law is uniform.

MORAL PRINCIPLES AND LEGAL PERCEPTS: It is said that moral principles are of individual and relative application; they must be applied with reference to circumstances and individuals, whereas legal rules are of general and absolute application.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND MORALS:  The distinction between the two, they are very closely related to each other. In considering the relationship between law and morals much will depend on how one defines law. Analytical, Historical, Philosophical and Sociological jurists all have defined law in their own way and these definitions materially differ from each other.

MORALS THE BASIS OF LAW:  All the rules originated from the common source, and the sanction behind them was of the same nature (mostly supernatural fear). In the early stages of the society no distinction was made between law and morals.

MORAL’S A TESTS OF LAW: It has been contended by a number of jurists, since very early times, that law must conform to morals. This view was supported by the Greeks and the Romans. In Rome, law to some extent, was made to conform to ‘natural law’ which was based on certain moral principles and as a result ‘jus civil’ was transformed into ‘jus gentium’.

ANCIENT JURISTS ‘NATURAL LAW: Most of the ancient jurists expressed their views in a spirit of compromise and attached sanctity to legal rules and institutions. They said that law, even if it is not in conformity with morals, is valid and binding.

NATURAL LAW ‘MORALS’: During the Dark Ages, Christian Fathers preached forcefully that law conform to Christian morals and said that any law against it is invalid. In the 17th and the 18th centuries, when the ‘natural law’ theory (which was based on certain morals) was at its highest, it was contended that law (positive law) must conform to natural law.

NON-CONFORMITY TO NATURAL LAW: Law which does not conform to natural law is to be disobeyed and the government which makes such law should be overthrown. It was this theory which inspired the French Revolution.  In modern times, such views that law must conform to morals and if it is not in conformity with morals, it is not valid and binding are no longer heard. However, in practice to a great extent law conforms to morals.

MORALS AS THE BASIS OF LAW: Many of the modern definitions of law say that the evaluation of interests is a very important test of law. This can be done properly in the context of socially recognised values which in their turn are closely related to morals. Thus, ultimately morals become the end of law.  This end has been expressed in the constitutions of many countries. If we look at the preamble of our own Constitution, we shall find that the ends which it endeavours to achieve are the morals; of course, they are the morals of the modern age.

MORALS AT THE END OF LAW: Morals have often been considered to be the end of law. A number of eminent jurists have defined law in terms of, ‘justice’. They say that the aim of ‘law’ is to secure justice. Justice in its popular sense is very much based upon morals. In most of the languages of the world, the words used for law convey an idea of justice and morals also. According to analytical jurists, any study of the ends of law falls beyond the domain of jurisprudence

THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO MORALS: Law has always a purpose; it is a means to an end, and this end is the welfare of the society. According to this utilitarian point of view, the immediate end of law is to secure social interests, that is, to secure harmony of claims or demands. It means that the conflicting interests (in the society) should be weighed and evaluated and the interests who can bring greater benefit with the least sacrifice should be recognized and protected.

EVALUATION OF INTERESTS: All becomes a question of choice. In making this choice and in weighing or evaluating interest, whether in legislation or judicial decision, or juristic writing, whether we do it by law making or in the application of law, we must turn to ethics for principles. Morals are an evaluation of interests; law is or at least seeks to be delimitation in accordance therewith.

MORALS AND  ‘PUBLIC OPINION’: Greatly influences law is made up of a number of things-political ideas, economic theory, ethical philosophy, etc. These directly and indirectly influence law.  Therefore, when so many elements work in shaping the legal precepts, the matter cannot be put in such a simple way as the relation between law and morals, because a number of factors join hands in influencing law, and morals is only one of them. However, some observations can be made about the relation between law and morals.

INFLUENCE OF MORALS ON LAW:  Law and morals act and react upon and mould each other. In the name of ‘justice’, ‘equity’, ‘good faith’, and ‘conscience’ morals have in filtered into the fabrics of law. In judicial law making, in the interpretation of legal precepts, in exercising judicial discretion (as in awarding punishment) moral considerations play a very important role.

MORALS WORK AS RESTRAINTS: Upon the power of the legislature because the legislature cannot venture to make a law which is completely against the morals of the society. Secondly, all human conduct and social relations cannot be regulated and governed by law alone. No positivist could deny that these are facts or that the stability of legal systems depends in part upon such types of correspondence with morals. If this is what is meant by the necessary connation of law and morals, its existence should be conceded.

THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF MORALS: This approach is more concerned with the ends that law has to pursue. Thus, recognised, or, in other words, morals (of course the morals of the modern age) have become a very important subject of study for good law making. On international law also morals are exercising a great influence.

THE NUREMBERG TRIALS: The brutalities and inhuman acts in World Wars made the people to turn back to morals and efforts are being made to establish standards and values which the nations must follow. Perhaps there is no other so forceful ground to justify the Nuremberg Trials as morals. If the law is to remain closer to the life of the people and effective, it must not ignore morals.

MORAL COURAGE:  Moral courage is the ability to stand up for and practice that which one considers ethical, moral behaviour when faced with a dilemma, even if it means going against countervailing pressure to do otherwise. It is the ability to stand up for and practice that which one considers ethical, moral behavior when faced with a dilemma, even if it means going against countervailing pressure to do otherwise

LINKS:

Dr. B.N.Tripathi, Jurisprudence Legal theory, (Allahabad Law Agency, Haryana).

Difference between law and morals, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=68341§ion=3.2.

Satoshi Kodama, Bentham’s Distinction between Law and Morality and Its Contemporary Significance-La distinction que fait Bentham entre droit et morale, et son importance actuelle,https://journals.openedition.org/etudes-benthamiennes/6378.

Liam Murphy, The Boundary of Law: Law, Morality, and the Concept of Law, October 28, 2004, https://ethics.harvard.edu/event/boundary-law-law-morality-and-concept-law.

https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1888-law-and-morality-in-the-light-of-jurisprudence.html

REGULATING MORALITY THROUGH THE COMMON LAW AND EXCLUSIONARY ZONING 2011  https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3237&context=lawreview

RESEARCHED BY : CAROL SAKEY    WEBSITE:  https://wakeupnz.org

POST CABINET PRESS CONFERENCE…6^th October 2021.HANSARD TRANSCRIPT – BEEHIVE. Chris Hipkins and Dr. McElnay answering questions posed by the Press. Dr McElnay is a NZ Medical Officer, she was the Director Of Public Health for the NZ Ministry Of Health (Govt) She was appointed a ‘Companion of the Queens Service Order for services to public health in the 2023 New Year Honours List. She worked for the NZ Ministry Of Health from 2016-2022

GAP IN JAB UPTAKE ‘We need to protect ourselves, our whanau, our communities. We need as many people as possible to have their 1^st jab to be partially protected. We need them to be fully vaccinated asap. Now enabling the 2^nd dose sooner, so people can be fully jabbed sooner, hence increase community immunity ..said Dr.McAcElnay

Chris Hipkins said : “How tricky the virus can be to manage” and “how dangerous it can be” and “COVID19 is tracking down unjabbed people, its making them sick” Our job is to get to the unjabbed people “before COVID19 finds them”. And refereed to the NORTH vs SOUTH ISLAND: – “We are an innately competitive country, its worth noting the North and South Island are neck to neck in the race to be the most jabbed island” Adding “Another piece of our plan continually improve accessibility to EVERYONE” Call the COVID19 Healthline ‘ITS FREE’.

Hipkins said “By far, the biggest, most powerful weapon we have in our fight against COVID19 is vaccination (JAB)/ Reduces rate of transmission. They are safe and everyone over 12 yrs of age can get one” and “We’ve got plenty of vax to go around” (It’s a weapon and they do not even know what it fully contains). “.Our strategy is to vigorously pursue cases that emerge “Zero cases in the community is unlikely”,  NZrs have shown they are willing  to pitch in be a Team of 5 Million (he refers to whole population-Team of 5million). We need you to channel your energy into giving  the FINAL PUSH (The Team of 5 Million)

“We can be the most vaccinated country in the world. We need a big collective push”. We ALL have a role to play to get vax rates up” NZrs who have had their 1^st dose, your job is not yet done” Make sure you get your 2^nd dose. Reach out to others who have not yet been vaxed” and “You need to help us get them comfortable with being vaxed, talk to them about the reasons you have chosen to be vaxed”. And “we want you to help make sure they get reliable, honest information about the vax. We want you to help deal with an logistical barriers that has stopped them from being vaxed”.  Its is critical. :We want to pull out the stops to increase our vax rates. Its never been more urgent than now” ITS URGENT- ITS CRITICAL..(But jab never tested for transmission begore going to global market place)

We are asking EVERYONE to contribute to a BIG NATIONWIDE push for Vaccination. Referring to Oct 16^th Super Saturday. All vax clinics open day and evening, just like election day, all our civic leaders and political leaders will contribute, make a big effort on that day. What we need now is DEMAND. We are releasing maps that show where the highest concentrations of unvaxed people, who are by suburb.. This will help our IWI who are pushing local communities and our local MPS would work together to mobilise their communities, whether going door to door, working the phones, waving signs, there is a role for everyone to play

We are asking media and the business community groups to play a role. Offer incentives to the unvaxed. Parents, grandparents encourage young NZrs to be vaxed. No-one should be left behind, no stone (UN AGENDA 2030 Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age) People need to make an informed choice about vaccination. NZs response is world leading uptake of vaccination, so I request everyone pitch in, lets get it done. EVERYONE- THE TEAM OF 55 MILLION. BUT THE CONTENTS OF THE JAB ARE A TRADE SECRET

Media asked Hipkins: How many gang members are in the current cluster?  Hipkis response “I don’t’s know, he asks Dr. McAlnay whether she has a precise figure” RESPONSE: No=I I don’t have a precise number, saying “Its quite a large number of gang member in this outbreak. Hipkins Replies YES. But a second previously he said “I don’t know how many”. HIPKINS reponded “Its about contract tracing, getting tested, getting vaxed” HOWEVER THE VAX HAD NOT BEEN TESTED FOR TRANSMISSION BEFORE ENTERING THE GLOBAL MARKET 

MEDIA QUESTION TO HIPKINS Is it your understanding the drug deal has been part of the transmission of COVID in this cluster? HIPKINS: I don’t have any information. I could speculate like everyone else. (SO-EVERYONE ELSE IS SPECULATING).  “How many special exemptions have been given to gang members, that have come into Auckland to help facilitate the vax, or testing regime?” HIPKINS-“Me personally have not given the exemptions” and “as far as I know two” (worms his way around the question). : How important is it that the Mongrel Mob leaders get out there and talk with people, who may not be listening to the press, or government messaging?. Adding “There is a lot of criticism of the Govt, that exemptions have been given to gang members, and how many gang members have caught COVID19?

CHRIS HIPKINS RESPONSE :Where we have been able to enlist gang member to help with contact tracing and testing, we have done that. Look, I have no time for gangs, have no sympathy for them, but COVID is number one priority

MEDIA to HIPKINS: “When people ask “why are you giving gangs special treatment what do you say”? HIPKINS RESPONSE:- “Where we needed to reach into places, where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we do.  Look, if there was another community organisation or some other entity where we needed to get someone in in order to make sure we were reaching into the places where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we would do.”

MEDIA TO HIPKINS:” Is there anyone with COVID unaccounted for at the moment?”HIPKINS: With contact tracing we are doing our absolute best to find them” And “Everyone that has been identified as a positive case is accounted for”

MEDIA: Can stadiums open under Alert Leve; 2 with more than 100 people”?  HIPKINS-‘ Did not know, said he would have to check it out”

Media: Can I just clarify some of the rules, because there’s still some confusion about the phase 1, mainly because the Government put up different sets of rules for these things. Can playgrounds open? Hipkins replied “Yes”. Then was asked  “Can you go to the toilet at your friends house if you are there for a bbq”?  HIPKINS-“NO”, not unless its an outside one                                                    THE INSANITY CONTINUES.– “Inside- Outside whats the difference”?)

MEDIA ASKED HIPKINS: “A mother was denied passage through the Auckland border for parenting arrangement because her parenting arrangement was whangai and not sanctioned by the court. Do you think that fair?” HIPKINS: “Very difficult to answer”

MEDIA: Can you give us more details about the deceased? Eg: How old, how long they have been in hospital, did they have underlying conditions?  Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details,. Media replied “Sorry, why wouldn’t you have those details? I mean it’s a pretty big piece of information that’s— Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details.” I only had details this morning.” Adding  “This morning was hours ago”

MEDIA: Rapid antigen testing is still in the trial phase so they haven’t been able to use that, is that correct? And have they been able to use saliva testing? Have they been able to go door to door?

HIPKINS: Rapid Antigen tests, there is international evidence they are good at detecting acute infections. PCR Tests are the best option that pick up the virus earlier.  Hipkins replied-“Rapid antigen tests are considerably less accurate when they are used in people with no signs or symptoms of infection. There is much evidence that RAT tests produce false positives and false negatives are not reliable. And then Media referred to 25 large business who were asking for RAT 370,000 RAT testing kits within the next 7 days. Hipkins responded “One of the reasons we’ve been reluctant in NZ is that they are NOT GOOD at detecting acute infection. And NOT SO GOOD at detecting the early onset of the infection. They potentially give people FALSE comfort

HIPKINS: Fairly soon RAT Tests will become part of our bigger response. BUT DIDN’T HE SAY THEY ARE NOT GOOD AT DETECTING INFECTION

MEDIA Then asked Hipkins “On encouraging every Kiwi to get vaxed, how would you start those conversations with the vax hesitant? Hipkins continued with ““How tricky the virus can be to manage” and “how dangerous it can be” and “COVID19 is tracking down unjabbed people, its making them sick” Our job is to get to the unjabbed people “before COVID19 finds them”

NORTH vs SOUTH ISLAND: Hipkins “We are an innately competitive country, its worth noting the North and South Island are neck to neck in the race to be the most jabbed island”.

Hipkins stated that the COVID19 Jab is “by far, the biggest, most powerful weapon we have in our fight against COVID19 is vaccination (JAB)/ Reduces rate of transmission. They are safe and everyone over 12 yrs of age can get one” and “We’ve got plenty of vax to go around” (It’s a weapon and they do not even know what it fully contains). He said that “our strategy is to vigorously pursue cases that emerge “Zero cases in the community is unlikely”,  NZrs have shown they are willing  to pitch in be a Team of 5 Million (he refers to whole population-Team of 5million), that we need you to channel your energy into giving  the FINAL PUSH (The Team of 5 Million). Stating “We can be the most vaccinated country in the world. We need a big collective push”. We ALL have a role to play to get vax rates up” NZrs who have had their 1^st dose, your job is not yet done” Make sure you get your 2^nd dose. Reach out to others who have not yet been vaxed. We want you to help make sure they get reliable, honest information about the vax. We want you to help deal with an logistical barriers that has stopped them from being vaxed”. Its is critical. :We want to pull out the stops to increase our vax rates. Its never been more urgent than now”

NOTE: ITS URGENT- ITS CRITICAL..(But jab never tested for transmission beFore entering the global market place)

Hipkins in pushing the jabs nationwide said “We are asking EVERYONE to contribute to a BIG NATIONWIDE push for Vaccination. Referring to Oct 16^th Super Saturday. All vax clinics open day and evening, just like election day, all our civic leaders and political leaders will contribute, make a big effort on that day. What we need now is DEMAND. We are releasing maps that show where the highest concentrations of unvaxed people, who are by suburb. This will help our IWI who are pushing local communities and our local MPS would work together to mobilise their communities, whether going door to door, working the phones, waving signs, there is a role for everyone to play

We are asking media and the business community groups to play a role. Offer incentives to the unvaxed. Parents, grandparents encourage young NZrs to be vaxed. No-one should be left behind, no stone unturned.    NOTE: UN AGENDA 2030 Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. He added ” People need to make informed choices about vaccination, that NZs response is a world leading one as to the uptake of vaccination, so I request everyone pitch in, lets get it done.

NOTE: EVERYONE- THE TEAM OF 55 MILLION. BUT THE CONTENTS OF THE JAB ARE A TRADE SECRET

Media asked Hipkins: How many gang members are in the current cluster?  Hipkis response “I don’t’s know, he asks Dr. McAlnay whether she has a precise figure” RESPONSE: No=I I don’t have a precise number

MEDIA says: Its quite a large number of gang member in this outbreak. Hipkins Replies YES. But a second previously he said “I don’t know how many”

HIPKINS: “Its about contract tracing, getting tested, getting vaxed” BUT THE VAX HAD NOT BEEN TESTED FOR TRANSMISSION BEFORE ENTERING THE GLOBAL MARKET

MEDIA QUESTION TO HIPKINS Is it your understanding the drug deal has been part of the transmission of COVID in this cluster? HIPKINS: I don’t have any information. I could speculate like everyone else. (SO-EVERYONE ELSE IS SPECULATING) And “How many special exemptions have been given to gang members, that have come into Auckland to help facilitate the vax, or testing regime?” HIPKINS responded -“Me personally have not given the exemptions” and “as far as I know two” (worms his way around the question)

MEDIA asks Hipkins: How important is it that the Mongrel Mob leaders get out there and talk with people, who may not be listening to the press, or government messaging? There is a lot of criticism of the Govt, that exemptions have been given to gang members, and how many gang members have caught COVID19?. Hipkins response “Where we have been able to enlist gang member to help with contact tracing and testing, we have done that. Look, I have no time for gangs, have no sympathy for them, but COVID is number one priority”

MEDIA to HIPKINS: “When people ask “why are you giving gangs special treatment what do you say”? HIPKINS RESPONSE:- “Where we needed to reach into places, where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we do.  Look, if there was another community organisation or some other entity where we needed to get someone in in order to make sure we were reaching into the places where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we would do.

MEDIA TO HIPKINS:” Is there anyone with COVID unaccounted for at the moment?”HIPKINS replied  “With contact tracing we are doing our absolute best to find them” And “Everyone that has been identified as a positive case is accounted for”

MEDIA: Can stadiums open under Alert Leve; 2 with more than 100 people”?  HIPKINS-‘ Did not know, said he would have to check it out”

Media: Can I just clarify some of the rules, because there’s still some confusion about the phase 1, mainly because the Government put up different sets of rules for these things. Can playgrounds open? Hipkins said “Yes”. Media adds “Can you go to the toilet at your friends house if you are there for a bbq”? Hipkins replied ‘NO’, not unless its an outside toilet”

MEDIA ASKED HIPKINS: “A mother was denied passage through the Auckland border for parenting arrangement because her parenting arrangement was whangai and not sanctioned by the court. Do you think that fair?” HIPKINS: “Very difficult to answer”.  MEDIA: Can you give us more details about the deceased? Eg: How old, how long they have been in hospital, did they have underlying conditions?  Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details,. Media again jumps in asking “Why wouldn’t you have those details? I mean it’s a pretty big piece of information”— Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details.” I only had details this morning.”. Media adds “This morning was hours ago”

MEDIA: Rapid antigen testing is still in the trial phase so they haven’t been able to use that, is that correct? And have they been able to use saliva testing? Have they been able to go door to door?

HIPKINS: Rapid Antigen tests, there is international evidence they are good at detecting acute infections. PCR Tests are the best option that pick up the virus earlier.

NOTE:  Rapid antigen tests are considerably less accurate when they are used in people with no signs or symptoms of infection. There is much evidence that RAT tests produce false positives and false negatives are not reliable.

MEDIA: Referred to 25 large business who were asking for RAT 370,000 RAT testing kits within the next 7 days.

HIPKINS SAID: One of the reasons we’ve been reluctant in NZ is that they are NOT GOOD at detecting acute infection. And NOT SO GOOD at detecting the early onset of the infection. They potentially give people FALSE comfort. Hipkins went on to say “Fairly soon RAT Tests will become part of our bigger response.”  BUT DIDN’T HE SAY THEY ARE NOT GOOD AT DETECTING INFECTION

MEDIA Then asked Hipkins “On encouraging every Kiwi to get vaxed, how would you start those conversations with the vax hesitant? Hipkins responded by saying “Those that have had the motivation to be vaxed, helps the unvaxed. When people ask “What does the vax do? Questions about MRNA nature of the vax. A Health practitioner is best bet. Refer to those Health Practitioners speaking online. And to the Mainstream Media. (Like Dr McAnally who was then working for the Ministry of Health and Mainstream Media having been purchased by the Govt” Dr McAnaulty adds “Seek conversations with trusted people, there is a wide range of Health Professionals, speak with them get the real facts.”

NOTE; Health Professionals most wont speak up because they will be de-registered from the Medical Council. Character assassinated by the Propaganda Machine. Those who have are no longer practicing because of that.

MEDIA: Referring to a 63 Yr old man was arrested and charged in connection with a protest at the Domain Auckland. Are you glad to see the police taking this sort of action, and would you encourage more of it? But Hipkins avoided getting into this, stated this was a matter for the police

MEDIA: Referring to Misinformation and other countries regulating algorithms. Are you going to ask Google, Facebook to reduce misinformation for the Super Saturday Vax Event? Hipkins said  “Facebook and Google from what I have seen have been quite proactive in removing some of the biggest sources of information in NZ. He added “I would ask social media companies to continue to be proactive in managing misinformation, where there are people who don’t have the right facts”

NOTE “Jacinda Ardern: “We will continue to be your single source of truth… Unless you hear it from us it is not the truth.”

MEDIA  – Media: Medical professionals have raised major concern that roadside drug testing is unreliable. Will you hold on pushing this through Parliament? Hipkins replied “Roadside testing does not fit into my domain. Address that question to the relevant minister. NOTE; Hipkins is the COVID19 Health & Response Minister,

 MEDIA: Would you be concerned if it were unreliable then would you like seeing this being pushed through? Hipkins response was “Its outside my domain. Can’t comment on it.”

NEW ZEALAND’S ALGORITHM CHARTER: Ardern introduced first Algorithm Charter in he world. Algorithms made up of teeny weeny invisible codes. (Says TRUST US). Shared with all Govt agencies, including police.  (Beehive 28/7/2020). Beehive Speech NEW ALGORITH CHARTER WORLDS FIRST.. Being used effectively across all govt agencies. Algorithms play a crucial role to make connections, identify relationships patterns across vast quantities of information. But James Shaw reports: NOT WITHOUT RISKS.. The Algorithm Charter was signed by 21 agencies, embedded in Te Ao Maori perspective and use of algorithms. Māori should be involved at the very beginning of the algorithm design process

New Zealand Police have commissioned a stocktake of algorithms  used to inform an algorithm governance policy for the future, including model life-cycle management. The charter commitments are specifically referenced in this work. ALGORITH CHARTER referenced for use in Police, COVID19 Misinformation-Disinformation online and the Christchurch Call. Censorship, surveillance information, data NZ Citizens and overseas visitors whom are public speakers.

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2021-10/Hipkins%2C%20Dr%20McElnay%20Press%20Conference%206%20October.pdf

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-algorithm-charter-world-first

https://data.govt.nz/assets/data-ethics/algorithm/Algorithm-Charter-Year-1-Review-FINAL.pdf