(25 page PDF author Prof Stuart E Madnick Ph.D December 2023). The Continued Threat to Personal Data. Key Factors Behind the 2023 Increase. (December 2023) Over 2.6 billion personal records were breached in 2021 and 2022 (1.1 billion in 2021 and 1.5 billion in 2022).  * The number of data breaches more than tripled between 2013 and 2022.2    * According to a 2023 report, over 80% of data breaches involved data stored in the cloud.   * In the first three quarters of 2023, the number of ransomware attacks increased by almost 70% compared to the first three quarters of 2022.  * 98% of organizations have a relationship with a vendor that experienced a data breach within the last two years  * In the first eight months of 2023 alone, over 360 million people were victims of corporate and institutional data breaches.   * In the first three quarters of 2023, one in four people in the US had their health data exposed in a data breach

RNZ Reported 3^rd June 2021 The number of cyber security incidents reported in New Zealand has risen 25% since this time last year (2020-2021). Government agency CERT NZ’s quarterly report shows there have been 1431 cyber security incidents in the first quarter of this year. The financial loss due to cyber attacks is 7%. Almost a ¼ of the breaches resulted in financial loss totaling $3 Million. Six cases involved in the loss of $100,000 or more. 278 incidents were referred to the police, an increase of 46% compared with the previous quarter

Ministry of Justice chief operating officer Carl Crafar said at this stage, it’s believed the incident affected access to approximately 14,500 coronial files relating to the transportation of deceased people, and approximately 4000 post-mortem reports. Stuff NZ reported 5^th October 2019 ‘Up to 1 million NZ patients data has been breached in a criminal cyber hack. Tu Ora Compass Health CEO Martin Hefforf confirmed this, that medical data could be in criminal hands after cyber attacks dating back years.  Wellington, Kapiti and Wairarapa Primary Health Organization (PHO) Tu Pra Compass Health confirmed anyone enrolled in a medical centre in the region between 2002- 2019 could be affected.

The extent of the patient files that were accessed was impossible to ascertain. PHO’s held individual data such as medical centre enrolment information including names, addressed, ethnicities, ages. It also held data that could be linked to individual patients advised on stopping smoking and alcohol related intake issues. Some information relating to children that were due for their immunizations, also those that were having diabetes checks, flu jabs, women recalled for cervical screening and people due for heart and diabetes checks. Also mental health counselling service information on patients. The current population area covered was about 648,00, but information goes back to 2001- until 2019. Therefore this could be personal information on living and dead people as well.

A newly-released report into last year’s cyber attack of the Waikato District Health Board said Te Whatu Ora needs to “think like a hacker” when building its security softwares. The ransomware attack last May brought the DHB’s hospitals and services to a halt for days, as it tried to restore its IT systems.

RNZ reported 4^th July 2020 ‘Details of active COVID 19 cases leaked in privacy breach. Stating there has been a massive privacy breach, with the leak of personal details revealing the identity of New Zealand’s 18 active Covid cases. RNZ has seen a document that includes the full names, addresses, age and the names of the hotel and one hospital the 18 have been quarantining in. Newshub reported 6/12/2022 Thousands of corona’s files, post mortem reports caught up in ministry of Justice hack. National Cyber Security, Ministry of Health, also police found evidence of cyber hacks going back to 2016. It was said that they will never know if individual patient has been accessed, it is likely they would never know , it was said. It was unclear who was behind the attacks, where they originated from, for what purpose, though one theory was ‘harvesting information for the purpose of identity theft’

Te Whatu Ora reported on their website there had been a cyber security incident affecting an IT service provider that has impacted Access to Te Whatu Ora data relating to bereavement and carias services. I tapped on the link and this text came up.. Sorry we cant find this page you are looking for (No surprises here)

In the 1960’a Maasai radical activist (Moringe Ole Parkipuny) former member of Tanzanian Parliament coined the phrase ‘Indigenous People’ . August 1989 he was the first African so called ‘Indigenous Person’ (A self-determined Indigenous Person) to address the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations in Geneva. He laid the foundations for the UN 2007 adopted UN Declaration for Indigenous Peoples Rights (UNDRIP)

An article written more recently in the New Yorker Magazine by Maniv Singh wrote ‘Many groups who identify as Indigenous don’t claim to be first peoples, many who did come first don’t claim to be Indigenous’. Winston Peters recently stated that Maori are not Indigenous to NZ they come from Hawaiki, but those that self identify in NZ as Indigenous People argue “they are Indigenous People’

Many African view the term ‘Indigenous People’ as having negative connotations, that concerted radical activists call themselves Indigenous People as do their international partners. Referring to the obsessive shift in attitudes. In Africa ‘Indigenous People’ call themselves the dominant class stating they reflect the interests activities beliefs of the majority. The so called ‘Indigenous People’ of New Zealand have taken the same attitude as if they are speaking for all those people with Maori ancestry, calling them ‘Our People’, without consent or consensus.

The Parkipuny coined phrase has become an expanded dominant force used as a political, economically rewarding tool to favour one group over all others in Nation States. Thus influencing environmental legislations and Resource Management, riddled in Identity Politics of Oppression and Victimhood. Useful in character assassinating Non-Maori whom oppose their narrative by demonizing industrialization in colonies. (Back to Tribal Feudalism- Decolonize everything) INSANITY.

The re-story telling, re-imaginings of a tribal warfare being non-=existent, that those of Maori ancestry were people of the forest that lived peacefully amongst themselves. Masking, silencing the genocide in the Chatham Island of the Morori by Maori tribalism, they were easy bait being peaceful loving people. The tribal warfare  attacks, slavery, torture, cannibalism to expose these facts one would be targeted as Racist, White Supremacist even those that have Maori ancestry have exposed this and also called white supremacists too.

The so called ‘Indigenous People’ aiding the Globalist Agenda 2030 ‘Our Future’ Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age- the main actors of this massive transformation are the UN & WEF, UN Nation Governments, Globalist Elite and Iwi Elite – Corporations, Global Asset Managers, Philanthropists eg Rockefeller, Gates Foundation etc., COP 28 ‘Indigenous People are at the centre, forefront of the global transformation Agenda 2030.

Like the words ‘Partnership’ Principles they were not created by the original Maori Version of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and nor was the phase ‘Indigenous People’. How did that coined Parkipuny phrase enter New Zealand? George Manuel President of the Canadian Indian Brotherhood with a Canadian Delegation visited to NZ, this was arranged by Justin Trudeau father Pierre Trudeau in 1971. George Manuel met with Maori Politicians where discussions took place on the use of the phrase ‘Indigenous People’

George Manual and the Canadian Delegation then travelled to a university in the Northern Territories of Australia where Manuel gave a speech to Aboriginal students on ‘Indigenous People’. Travelling from one place to another, the Parkipuny coined phrase ‘Indigenous People’ expanded across the world. George Manuel then established the UN International Indigenous Peoples Council. At one UN gathering 100+ native, tribal people walked out in protest complaining they had never consented to being classed as ‘Indigenous People’

The adopted ‘self determined’ identification ‘Indigenous People’ a one label for many natives, tribes, with numerous various cultures, traditions and globally 4,000 plus different languages. George Manuel was influential in planning the UNDRIP which took many years to plan, also Maori Ngati Awa hosted the first International Conference on Indigenous Cultural & Intellectual property rights

On the drafting of the UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous People many governments actively opposed it because of legal arguments such as NZ, Canada, US and Canada. It was in 1985 that enough UN Nation States agreed to drafting the UN Declaration hence establishing a working group to draft a plan. Maori from New Zealand were involved. Moana Jackson was a chairperson at the UN in 1990. Also involved were Joe Williams, Aroha Mead the daughter of Alec Kaihau who was also involved. Nganeko Minhinnick and her brother -Alec Kaihau (A family affair you could say. However as the years went by more Maori were involved in the drafting of the UNDRIP including Aunty Pauline Tangiora.

The Non-binding UNDRIP was first adopted at New York UN Headquarters 13^th September 2007 (143 countries in favour of the UNDRIP- 4 countries rejected it-Australia, Canada, US, NZ- 11 abstained). Over the years Clair Charters who has been awarded a role in the NZ Human Rights Commission, Tracy Whare, Maona Sinclair and Catherine Davis are self determined advocates of the UNDRIP the goal being to implement this in New Zealand.

So why did the Labour Govt reject the 2007 UNDRIP.? Rosemary Banks was the representative of NZ that spoke for NZ at the UN Assembly on 13^th Sept 2007, she explained to the gathering why NZ opposed the UNDRIP. She referenced 4 Provisions in and 4 articles that were non compliant to NZ that NZ has difficulty with. The text of the UN Declaration being fundamentally incompatible with NZ’s Constitutional and Legal arrangements also the Treaty Of Waitangi and the principle of governing NZ for the ‘GOOD OF ALL NZ CITIZENS’

Article 26 of the UN Declaration on Lands and Resources, Article 28 on Redress (Compensation) Articles 10 and 32 on ‘Rights of Veto Over The State’ . Article 26 states that ‘Indigenous Peoples’ have the right to own, use, develop or control lands, territories they have traditionally owned, occupied, used. This means the entire country of NZ being potentially caught up in the scope of this article. Does not recognize the rights of land lawfully owned by other citizens. Indigenous People would have rights that others do not have. Does not take into account land tenures.

The whole country would fall under Article 28 of the UNDRIP on ‘Redress’ (Compensation0. Does not take into account the land occupies by others legitimately. Implies that Indigenous People have  the Right to Veto that other groups or individuals do not have. The Provisions of the UNDRIP are so fundamentally incompatible with the democratic processes of NZ as a Sovereign Nation State, with legislation and NZ’s Constitutional arrangements.

Implies Indigenous People have the Veto Rights over Democratic Legislature & National Resource Management. Implies 2 classes of citizenship. Supporters of the UNDRIP in 2007 at the UN Assembly explained the UN Declaration as being an ‘aspirational’ document, one of inspiration rather than having a legal effect. In 2010 John Key under the National Govt arranged under a veil of secrecy for Pita Sharples of the Maori Party to sign the UNDRIP at the UN. Those other UN Nations States that rejected the UNDRIP have since agreed to it.

November 21-23^rd 2023 a convention took place at Auckland University with overseas guests and speakers namely ‘The Korero Constitution’ referencing the enabling of the UNDRIP into NZ’s Constitutional arrangements. Nanaia Mahuta opened the 2^nd day of the convention.

As the Three Party Coalition openly talk about the ‘Principles of the Treaty Of Waitangi’, time to bring certain issues of concern, and the facts to the eyes of NZ Citizens. The original Maori Version of Te Tiriti o Waitangi did not create a ‘Partnership’ nor ‘Principles’ nor was the coined Parkipuny phrase ‘Indigenous Peoples’ created by Te Tiriti O Waitangi. Te Tiriti O Waitangi NZ’s founding document has been severely corrupted.

Recent COP 28 gathering “Indigenous People’ are at the centre, forefront of Climate Change, the Global Agenda 2030’

PUBLIC ASSETS BELONG TO ALL NEW ZEALANDERS:  Firstly ‘What is a Publicly Owned Asset’.? This is ‘Public Commercial Assets owned by the ‘Public Sector’ that are able to generate income that the Government control. (they belong to all New Zealanders)

REFERENCE TO AN ARTICLE 14^th March 2011 published by Dr Muriel Newman titled ‘Corporate Iwi Get Rich At Your Expense’ (Dr Muriel Newman established the NZ Centre for political Research as a ‘Public Policy Think-Tank’ in 2005 after 9 years as a Member of parliament, A Former Chamber of Commerce President. Her publication includes the description of a ‘shadowy, powerful group of tribal elite’, the driving force behind the acquisition of public assets (The assets that ALL Citizens own). The claiming of assets as an ‘Indigenous Right’. The group penetrating Maori and National Parties.

Auckland University Guest Commentator of NZCPR Prof. Elizabeth Rata has written extensively about dangers of NZ’s Liberal Democratic System of ‘Iwi Indigenous Rights’ Strategy. The threatening of the preservation of our ‘public commons’ eg ‘the coastline, National Parks, Water, Air- as the Iwi Elite seek to privatize ‘public assets’. Rata refers to a speech namely ‘People Power or Ethnic Elites?’ which was given to the ‘Anatomy of Power Conference at Auckland University in 2005’

As she explained the strategies over the previous 5 years as being a shift of strategies used by Iwi in their quest for ‘property rights’ and ‘constitutional recognition’ The using the Treaty Of Waitangi as a justification for a comprehensive indigenous group rights argument. The claiming customary rights are property rights guarantreed under English Common Law.

Elizabeth Rata states how interpretation is crucial ‘If Iwi approach were to be successful’, however the consequences for NZ are very serious. “The Property Rights argument will privatize large public socio-economic assets into the hands of Iwi Corporations” she said. “Hence creating a permenant gap between the small iwi elite with aristocratic pretensions on the one hand and the majority of New Zealanders of all ethnicities on the other”. This being the ‘inclusion of Iwi into the nations constitutional arrangement, that will undermine integrity and the constitutional arrangements of New Zealand

This concept may seem of remote academic interest but I want to show today how its interpretation is crucial. If the iwi approach were to be successful, the consequences for New Zealand are serious. The property rights argument will privatise large public socio-economic assets into the hands of iwi corporations. This will create a permanent gap between a small iwi elite with aristocratic pretensions on the one hand and the majority of New Zealanders of all ethnicities on the other. The larger group rights argument for the inclusion of iwi into the nation’s constitutional arrangements will undermine the integrity of the New Zealand nation.”

The Iwi Elite with the insatiable appetite for public resources, for the National Party to stay in power at that time they were prepared to sacrifice public ownershop of the coast of New Zealand to the Iwi Elite. 2003 the National Party reinterpreted a Court of Appeal ruling that indicated that some rare, remote and hard to prove pockets of customary title to the foreshore

What Elizabeth warned about in 2005 is occurring today. The Marine and Coastal Area Bill will privatise to iwi corporations the public commons that makes up the entire coastal area of New Zealand. The government has never sought an open mandate from the public for this course of action. It is instead the result of a cosy deal between powerful iwi interests – with an insatiable appetite for public resources – and a National Party that is so desperate to stay in power that it is prepared to sacrifice public ownership of the coast and seabed might still exit in NZ, as justification for the repeal of public ownership of the entire coastline. To ensure that Iwi Elite succeeded with their claim National reversed the burden of proof, Iwi would not have to prove customary title exists, the Crow

To pursue their goal, the National Party reinterpreted a 2003 Court of Appeal ruling, that indicated that some rare, remote and hard to prove pockets of customary title to the foreshore and seabed might still exist in New Zealand, as justification for the repeal of public ownership of the entire coastline.

To make sure elite iwi will succeed with their claims National has reversed the burden of proof: iwi will not have to prove customary title exits. Mational ruled out for Iwi to have to prove claims in a court of law, instead allowing deals to transfer millions if not billions of dollars worth of public assets to private corporation (Public assets that belong to ALL New Zealanders).

This was done through secret negotiations with a Government Minister. Additional to this they significantly lowered the threshold tests to ensure vast tracts of PUBLIC COASTLINE were transferred into Iwi Elite private hands.Please Note: Iwi Elite we voice “Our People”, however they do not have consent to speak for ALL people with Maori Ancestry DO NOT represent all people with Maori Ancestry,

They speak out of ‘Self Interest-Self Rewards’. Key members of the Iwi Elite make up the Iwi Chairs Forum that includes Mark Solomon, Tuku Morgan, Sommy Tau, Margaret Mutu, Toko Renata, Ngahiwi Tomoana, Apirana Mahuika. All have a close association with the government and have personally benefited, for instance Tuky Morgan was paid out at least $141,000 in directors fees, add $100,000 success fee’s for completing Tainui Waikato Settlement. He was also paid as a Crown Facilitator to help with the Iwi settlement process. Between November 2008 and March 1^st, the Office Of Treaty Settlements paid him $171,000

In 2011 Maori Corporations were estimated to be worth $25 billion almost half the value of the NZ Stock Exchange (Wealth gained from privatization of public assets (Publically owned by ALL New Zealanders) given to them by successive NZ Governments, and they always want more and more.

Collectively, Maori corporations are understood to be worth as much as $25 billion – almost half of the value of the New Zealand stock exchange. This is the wealth that has originated from the privatization of public assets given to them by successive government. But now they want more. With their huge appetite for wealth and power, they have a mineral rich foreshore and seabed, the generating of vast commercial returns from mining iron-sands, setting up marine farms, and a myrid of commercial opportunities that have arisen out of their ownership rights

The Iwi Leaders Forum have held regular meetings with successive governments, given access to confidential cabinet papers. The Māori Party having this cozy relationship with the National Iwi Chairs Forum as they have emerged as the key stakeholder group. The Māori Party allowing them access to the key cabinet strategy committee on Treaty issues which has comprised of successive governments.

If Iwi Elite Leaders want it, so do they Maori Party. Iwi Elite through the Māori Party doorway the focus on the prime target being the ownership and control of fresh water. Whanau Ora providing a wide range of lucrative opportunities for Iwi Elite to contract out service provisions in social areas including Housing and Corrections.

Margaret Mutu has been an influential voice, activist of the Iwi Elite, appointed the Chair of the Iwi Leaders Constitution Group with Moana Jackson the convenor (Moana Jackson had a special role at the UN UNDRIP Planning in 1990) Iwi Leaders Group preparation of a report namely ‘ to be the dissemination to Iwi and given to the Crown as the model for New Zealand’s Constitutional arrangements.

Now the National Party ‘Chriss Luxon’ Prime minister has been put in a dire situation as with Winston Peters NZ First and David Seymour -Act Party. Because the National Party had been jumping to the tune of the powerful Iwi Elite Corporations, to privatize valuable ‘Public Assets) owned by ALL New Zealanders. National Party had ceded to their demands, betrayed the vast majority of New Zealanders, successive governments have not protected our public assets, or the publics interests.

The Sky Is Falling Is Falling In: Chicken Little was in the woods one day when an acorn fell on her head. It scared her so much she trembled all over. She shook so hard, half her feathers fell out. Help, help.. She shook so hard and half her feathers fell out. Help..Help.. she cried. The sky is falling I have to go and tell the King!

Selling your family into financial slavery to the UN and Multinational carbon trading minions for the next century. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famibe and the like would fit the bill.. all these dangers are caused by human intervention.. the real enemy then in humanity itseld. (Council Of Rome 1991)

In 2017 David Seymour authored a book titled ‘Own Your Own Future’ A Liberal Vision For New Zealand in 2017. Published 2017 by ACT NZ. The following is a description of some of the content of the text written in the book by Seymour:-

We embrace markets, technological innovation  *The reason doomers get it wrong they underestimate or even ignore technological change       *If you predict the future on the basis of the current technology you will be wrong, not just wrong but wildly wrong

That a few pessimists  have gone wildly wrong over the years:- ‘Malthus on population 1798.  *Ehrlich 1968 author of the book ‘Population Bomb’ referring this to the Club of Romes Project ‘Limits to Growth. And Al Gore claiming in 2006 we only had 10 years left to save the planet.

The pessimists are wildly wrong, because we are still thriving. The past 30years we’ve witnessed the greatest reduction in global poverty in the history of the planet. Attributed to globalization, international trade and freer markets.

He referred to the innovation of ideas being highly relevant to climate change issues, referencing the plunging price of solar power, rising efficiency of large scale wind power. The energy transition that will be underway through the next 2 decades and beyond

Forecasts of global fossil fuel use based on current technologies will be wildly overstated. We should all be skeptical of the intense politicalization of climate science debates.  It’s always suspicious when scientific issues seem to line up with political positions. The Left/Right Divide tends to correlate with alarmist/sceptic positions, this is weird from whichever side you come from.

Seymour admitted “Personally I am in the ‘luke-warmist’ camp as outlined by Matt Ridley, meaning I think global warming is real, part of it is probably man-made. But I am skeptical as to the  degree to which it is dangerous. I have a moderately well informed opinion

Seymour refers to ludicrous claims of near scientific infallibility, science by nature is uncertain. The earth is warming ever since the end of the ice age, that’s true, what happens at the end of the ice age, small or big is pretty much by definition.

Saying humans had some influence on warming in recent times, say late 20^th century. But its about NZ doing its bit, even though how much warming is uncertain, it’s precautionary to take some action. As time passes and knowledge improves we will find out whether NZ should be responding with greater urgency or lesser

Whatever NZ does as to the impact on global warming there will be zero outcomes, however there is a strong case for NZ to contribute as good global citizens, it’s about doing our bit, even though the contribution is tiny and will NOT determine outcomes. Saying this applies even if one  is skeptical about the more extreme alarmist enthusiasms of the climate change zealots, especially those that have built a political program around it. Referring to NZs ETS Scheme he said “the complexity, cost, the rort involved in global emissions trading Acts policy has always been to dump the ETS, it’s a policy disaster.

He said he preferred a simple low tax, then gradually increase the tax like road user charges but the govt should not make a cent out of the revenue from it. If the science suggested the risks of global warming were rising increase the tax, if the science develops the likely risks are lower, lower the tax. As far as NZ is concerned we are very much a passenger as far as global warming is concerned, we can’t have any influence on outcomes.

We could gradually increase tax over time, if the science suggested that the risks of global

1)David Seymour obviously is very uncertain about the global warming debacle. He is in the luke-warmist camp. Accentuates we do not have enough knowledge about global warming as yet, but NZ must do its bit to be good global citizens although will have no effect on outcomes.

That extreme global warming alarmist enthusiasms of the climate change zealots have built a political program around it. That the Emissions Trading Scheme is a disaster-complex and costly.

Seymour refers to the ‘doomers’ Thomas Malthus, Club of Rome’s Project/book ‘Limits to Growth’ and the Population Bomb, all being those that practice, believe in the Malthusian theory. That human population will far out grow resources need for the global population to survive, therefore this would bring wars, famine and disease. Not taking into consideration the advancing of technology and the decreasing of populations as is happening now throughout the world. Replacement level of many countries are below 2.1, a population level as set by the IMF & The World Bank (Thomas Malthus Essay 1798 ‘Principle of Population’).

That today the threats of climate change, water scarcity, lack of arable land, energy crisis,famine and endless human population growth fuels the concerns of a ‘Malthusian disaster through a Malthusian Crisis/catastrophe’ that is looming in the 21^st century. (The carrying capacity of a species).

Since the end of World War11, the UN FAO (Food & Agriculture Organization has been collecting world agriculture stats, using this data to study, implement policies to reduce hunger according to specific targets. The FAO developed a definition of ‘Food security’ (FAO, IFAD, WFD 2015). A population that has achieved ‘Food Security would therefore have a PoU of ZERO.

The Oil Crisis on 2008 sparked the beginning of what you see happening today, the uncertainties of the global food market and its ability to feed populations and the Malthusian catastrophe has ,in my opinion been a justification for the Klaus Schwab’s baby ‘Stakeholder capitalism to replace the worlds innovative ‘Free-market Enterprising Economy’ (Corporate Capture.

The signing of an Official partnership memorandum between the UN and WEF is documented as, the partnership officially came about to accelerate, advance UN Agenda 2030. The WEF membership has huge political clout and massive funds to support this advancing of UN’s Agenda 2030.

Environmental Malthusianism being the idea that the human population growth is the primary driver of environmental harms and population control is a prerequisite to environmental protection, hence sterilization programs, birth control programme’s and International Planned Parenthood Federation.

Margaret  Sanger, a Socialist Activist and believer in Eugenics. Rockefeller Jnr was an early advocate of Sanger’s pioneering work, she originally founded the American Birth Control League which later became the US  Planned Parenthood Federation. (IPPF is affiliated with NZ Family Planning Association)

Slowing down the world’s population by using women’s rights to productive decisions, greater access to education and political decision making can effectively slow down population growth (New York Times 19/08/1994). The third UN sponsored International Conference on Population & Development held in Cairo organized by Margaret Sanger. She was willing to employ ‘Eugenicist and ‘Malthusian’ justifications for birth control. Sanger was granted funds from the Rockefeller Foundation