GENE THERAPY ‘ PFIZER’- ASTRAZENICA- THE NZ NEW GENE THERAPY BILL 2024…

Pfizer adheres to NZ Regulations for Medicines, this includes ‘Gene Therapy’. NZ is focusing on its Gene Technology Regulations to facilitate Research *Development * Manufacture of New Therapies. Pfizer compliancy is bound by NZ Regulations for the Pharmaceutical Industry that covers all aspects of Medicines, including emerging fields eg:- Gene Therapy. With NZ Govt updating its Regulations to make it easier for the Medical Professions, Scientists to develop Gene Therapies including Gene Technology.

NZ Govt moving from a Restrictive System to one that facilitates Research and Access to Treatments. Pfizer’s role is well known as being focused on Gene Therapy Research and Development internationally. Pfizer trials on Gene Therapy would need Medsafe approval for local trials in NZ. Late 2024 early 2025 NZ Govt began over-hauling its Gene Therapy Regulations to replace the 30yr Hazardous Substance and New Organism (HSNO) Act

The new Gene Technology Bill is modeled on Australia’s Gene Technology Act. A new Regulator will be established with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to oversee the field. This will allow for Fast Tracking of Gene Therapies. Hence Pfizer’s most prominent activity to Gene Technology in NZ has been to supply MrNA COVID 19 Jabs, which have received Provisional Approval by MedSafe…(MedSafe is NZs Medicines Regulator)

Alexion is an AstraZeneca subsidiary that acquired a portfolio of pre-clinical Gene Therapies from Pfizer in a Global deal. NZ Researchers are currently conducting clinical trials on Gene Therapies. NZs growing involvement in this field (even prior to the latest Legislative changes). NZs  Worlds First Trials – the Clinical Research Center using CRISPA in NZ. The Malaghan Institute of Medical Research running NZs first CART-Cell Trial- Genetically modifying a patients Immune Cells

Auckland University led Trials on Gene Therapies. Research collaboration in NZ Clinical Research Centers- Universities- Hospitals are already collaborating to accelerate Genetic Research and Advanced treatments using Gene Therapies for companies like Pfizer a Path to Gene Therapies in NZ. Gene Therapies include modification of Plants etc., This is backed majorly by the National and ACT Party. Reported to be a permissive approach to Gene Modification of Risks & Benefits.

Gene Technology involves Plants * Animals  * Humans * Micro-organisms = DNA. Also described as Genetic Engineering or Genetic Modification. GMOs  are organisms that have undergone the process or inherited modification of Genes. Gene Technology from a Technical perspective can involve *Modification * Removal & Multiplication * Relocation of a Gene within an organism- or the Transfer of a Gene from one Species to another

The Genetic Modification of Crops to increase production is reported to improve resistance to environmental conditions (Adaption to Climate Change referring to the Agricultural Industry)  The Gene Technology 1996- 2024 Approach- Gene Technology releasing GMOs into the Environment is heavily restricted under Law- although heavily restricted its still possible with Regulations approval

The primary barrier of using Gene Technology and GMOs in the Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act 1996. Amendments were made in 2000 to incorporate recommendations made by the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification which meant very little changed as far as the Law is concerned. The Law at this present time before new legislation kicks in is:-

A GMO may not be imported * manufactured * developed * field tested or released into the environment other than in accordance with an approval. The  current ACT does not provide a wholesale ban on the release of GMOs outside a Lab setting in NZ. Although it does make it subject to EPA approval. The using GMOs inside Labs  are strictly regulated. GMOs can only be implemented into a developed or tested within a containments facility (A Controlled Lab) approved by the Ministry Of Primary Industries (MPI)

Operated in accordance with MPI and EPA Standards and other legal barriers such as approval from authorities in NZ. The Bio-Security Act 1993 prohibits Importation * Release * Propagation of GMOs that are not approved for Important by the current legislation (HSNO ACT). This is enforced at the Border by MPI

Between the HSNO Act and other Environmental Legislations this has been an area of tension in NZ, as a result Court decisions and some Local Authorities consider they have the power under the Resource Management Act (RMA) 1991 to regulate the use and release GMOs through Policy Statements and Plans. There are Bio-Security hurdles as to the use of Gene Technologies, therapeutic products that are GMOs which are regulated by Medsafe under the Medicine Act 1981. The Human Tissues Act 2008 which contains general prohibition on Trading in Human Tissue * Cells * Blood * Bone Marrow and other Body Parts

Australia’s Hybrid Approach is likely to be adopted in NZ. RMA Restrictions removed and the HSNO Act amended. NZ Regulators will utilize overseas regulations as to its activities. Automatic authorization will be granted for Human Medicine – Regulations for the New Gene Technology is expected to be in place by the end of 2025.. The NZ Omnibus Bill seeks to use Gene Technology in NZ by establishing a new Regulatory regime (Gene Technology Bill 2024)

AstraZeneca- Pfizer $1 Billion Gene Therapy deal with Astrenica’s subsidiary Alexion- a portfolio of pre-clinical Gene Therapy and Technologies from Pfizers deal. Alexions Global Pre-clinical Research is conducted globally. Eg 2019 collaboration with NZ Pharma focusing on discovery, research up to pre clinical stage trials. The Global Pre-clinical Candidate in 2024 is called ZP1000468 developed by Alexion and NZ Pharma prepared for Clinical Trials.

Watch for the partnership announcements as to future collaboration that could lead to new clinical trials in NZ. Alexion has had interactions with NZ Pharmaceutical Regulatory body Pharmac for its approved medicines. 2019 Alexion announced collaboration with Danish BioTech company..NZ to lead certain therapies. NOTE:- Local Clinical Trial Websites.. Research Networks * PCRN * Momentum Clinical Research * Clinical Trials NZ

NZ Gene Therapy Law aims to create opportunities for companies like Pfizer by modernizing regulations similar to Australian Gene Technology Regime. However there are Risk when it comes to Gene Therapies. And Australia does refer to those risks and the consequence involved. Concerns about integrating Vectors. Leading to severe health problems. Long term follow-ups are crucial. There are many uncertainties. Risks and Uncertainties

WakeUpNZ.. RESARCHER: Cassie

...

Health Blog Posts View all Categories

ARDERN BOASTS SHE WANTS OTHER NATIONS TO TAKE HER LEAD

Scientists have admitted that man made global warming is a massive hoax. The Norwegian Nobel Committee rescinded the Peace Prize it awarded in 2007 to former US vice president Al Gore and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, amid overwhelming evidence that global warming is an elaborate hoax cooked up by Mr. Gore.

A press release from the committee that quotes a chagrined Rajendra Pachauri, who is the UN IPCC climate panels chair, claimed he was a victim of a “cunning deception spanning over many years”
Saying “he was deeply ashamed for having unwittingly perpetrated such a massive fraud on the governments of the world”.
Reports have shown that data from data satellites and radiosondes, surface temperature readings, borehole analysis, measurements of rising seas, melting glaciers and permafrost…..pheno-logical data and proxy reconstructions of paelo-climatic conditions were fabricated out of thin air by my former friend, who is Al Gore …

After Al Gore Noble Peace Prize & IPCC (UN) was revoked, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee awarded the prize money to the 31,000 people who signed the Oregan Petition, the peace prize money was shared between each signatory of the petition. ($1.53 million)
Al Gore owned up to hus duping of the scientific community. In a blog on his website, the explained the so called ‘genesis of his scheme’. It went like this .. “now that the jig is up (he’d been found out to be a liar) ..
”Now that the jig is up, as long as I can remember, my goal is life has been to destroy free-market capitalism, to replace it with global totalitarian social.. but it seemed that tradition methods such as guerrilla warfare were proving unsuccessful.,
then one day in 1988, I was strolling through the halls of my giant mansion when it hit me:- carbon dioxide… by striking at the molecule that lies at the heart of industrial civilization I could bring the whole system to its knees and usher in a workers paradise.”
He goes on to say “The rest just sort of fell into place….“ I wrote a book, held some Congressional hearings, made a movie, dashed off a few pseudonymous journal articles on radiative forcing…. and the next thing you know, I was on TV with Dave Matthews and Ludacris where I convinced people to purchase carbon offsets”.. He said “ I would have gotten away with it if it were not for that darn petition”

The New York Times quoted ‘NASA climate scientists James Hanen, an very outspoken advocate of limiting gas emissions saying that Al Gore ruse sucked him in “hook, line and sinker”. Not all scientists of course were fooled by Gore, but many have remained silent…
One scientist stated :- It is our hope that, whenever future generations find themselves swayed by the notion that one can derive generalizations about the physical world by gathering measurable data and subjecting it to logical analysis, they will recall the humbling and extraordinary events of today, April Fools Day, 2009.

Some severely character assassinated, lost their reputation through a litany of lies about them, others have been silenced by money or been threatened in some way or another. There are trillions of dollars being made and will continue to be made by global eco geographical multistakeholder capitalist corporations through global greening. The Green Mask, the mask that hides the ugly face of Marxism, socialism, communism.

The mask that hides the truth behind the World Economic Forums official strategic agreement with the United Nations. On the 13th June 2019, prior to COVID19. The Global Public Private Corporate Governance. As the WEF and UN collaborate on every part of how you live, eat, whether you work or not, welfare and income, no doubt a universal income… digital controls through the money markets.
When WEF’s Directorship board meet, Al Gore, Black Rock and a couple of members of Bidens, Obama’s, Clinton team are on board… also Jac Ma the richest man in China… And a couple of leading executives from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and of course Klaus Schwab himself, founder of the WEF and chairman. All to accelerate UN Agenda 2030.

The collaboration of Vaccine Passes, certificates with digital wallets, a cashless society.. where political policing will know your behaviours, the way you think, who you meet, where you go etc., In NZ before the select committee the Digital ID Framework Trust Bill. (Ignore the word TRUST).
All your individual id in one place…. How convenient. For the government that rules from the top down that has seriously violated all our human rights. Trust the government, when even your driver licensing info is shared with 3rd parties. And of course what about cyber attacks, hacks.
Many of you may not have heard of the Oregon Petition, a political petition that was designed to educate the public about scientific results, the consensus of climate change research. This petition urged the US Government to reject the man made hoax- the Kyoto man made global warming protocol of 1997 and the policies that have followed.

The petition reads:- We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.

Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

Back to Al Gore,s court case where this British Judge ruled Al Gores doco “An Inconvenient Truth’ that was distributed around the world.. ruled that Al Gore’s Doco was not to be shown in UK Schools unless accompanied by materials explaining the films inaccuracies”. Gores doco was determined as biased, the law suit alleged. Gores doco was to go to 3,500 secondary schools in the UK as part of a ‘Sustainable schools year of action’. The Education Secretary at the time, Alan Johnson said “that influencing the opinions of children is crucial to developing a long term public view of the environment’
4.Yes that’s what they do, influence the minds of the young through the education system,.. dumbing education down.
Gore’s doco was described at the court by one person who opposed it as “just over half of the film is scientific material, 30% pure politics and 20% much, much.. used to soften up the viewer to persuasion”.

This barrister said “ scientifically the majority of the arguments advanced are false, or falsely exaggerated on the basis of the governments own evidence. The key flaw to Gores film is partisan, aimed at influencing rather than informing, it lacks balance.. that the government set out to disseminate .. what we say, this is about advancing political political propaganda into schools…
This very same political propaganda that is being taught in New Zealand schools.
That’s what happens, when the truth is spoken that does not fit the geo-eco political narratives.. truth tellers are called conspiracy theorists from the propaganda machine

Al Gore has authored several eco-political books…he is the co-founder and chairman of Generation Investment Management. He is also a senior partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and a member of Apple, Inc.’s board of directors, and spends much of his time as chairman of ‘The Climate Reality Project’ .. Never let a good crisis go to waste. Ardern and her political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington are not.
Gore was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1976, 1978, 1980 and 1982 and the U.S. Senate in 1984 and 1990. He was inaugurated as the forty-fifth Vice President of the United States on January 20, 1993, and served eight years.

During the Administration, Gore was a central member of President Clinton’s economic team. He served as President of the Senate, a Cabinet member, a member of the National Security Council and as the leader of a wide range of Administration initiatives
In New Zealand the Government has influenced, brainwashed our children through the education system as to UN Agenda 2030. Climate Alarmism, The seas will rise so high, the planet is on fire.. now brainwashed and indoctrinated they are taught to make placards and go on School Climate Strike. Don’t blame the young, in fact blame every political cronie in the cesspit of Wellington for mentally abusing our children through the school system. Dumbing education down.

Official mental health services in the UK have documented that the teaching of climate alarmism through education .. this is affecting many children’s mental health, they have now officially called this a mental issue ..namely ‘Eco Alarmism’

The UN recently proclaimed “A code Red for Climate Change”. A code Red of how populations worldwide are being hammered, severely disempowered by those that promote this climate alarm globally, that fills our childrens heads with fear. Code Red be aware of the UN/WEF Public-Private Corporate Governance.. the global – national geo-eco-political power play, the stench of greed of the 1% of the whole of the worlds population, those that are represented by the WEF… as they in collaboration with Ardern and all those political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington have eroded your freedoms and human rights as they all are part and parcel of this evil global corruption of causing severe havock to peoples lives worldwide.
And they could never have achieved this cruel evilness without an introduction of a global crisis, to shut the worlds economy down, to indoctrinate, brainwash – influence a new normal society with a new normal economy…without the COVID19 Global Crisis none of this insanity, erosion of freedoms, human rights could have happened.

Ardern entered UN Agenda 2030 in NZ Governments policy decision making. 17 out of 17 global development goals (17 SDG’s) include Climate Alarmism. 14 of 17 include ‘The UN Global Strategy of Vaccines.. (2011-2019). Then the UN Global Strategy of Vaccines introduced in 2019 prior to COVID19.. IA 2030.
The Decade of Vaccines 2020-2030. Documented by the UN- LEAVE NO-ONE BEHIND..EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE AT EVERY AGE. A LIFETIME OF VACCINES.. FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE…WHO (UN) REPORT- HESITANCY TO VACCINES= DEMAND THEM. TARGET THOSE THAT HAVE VACCINE HESITANCY. USE PSYCHO BABBLE- USE CHARM…KINDNESS….
NEW VACCINES.. 95% UPTAKE AT LEAST FOR NEW VACCINES. Teach children as young as 10 years old about the importance of Vaccines through the education system. All included in UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals.

Ardern was a guest speaker at a Bill & Melinda Gates event during which she boasted having entered UN Agenda 2030 17 SDG’a into NZ Policies, she added quite proudly “other nations may take her lead”.

...

INFORMED CONSENT

Article 21 Health- Informed Consent
Prepared by the International Disability Caucus

The Working Group text for article 21 deals with informed consent in paragraphs (j) and (k):-
Ensure that health and rehabilitation services provided to persons with disabilities, and the sharing of their personal health or rehabilitation information, occur only after the person concerned has given their free and informed consent, and that health and rehabilitation professionals inform persons with disabilities of their relevant rights;

Prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

A footnote in the Working Group text suggested a definition for informed consent:- “Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.

1. Informed consent is an aspect of the right to health:- The right to the highest attainable standard of health (art. 12 ICESCR) states:-
The right to health contains both freedoms and entitlements. The freedoms include the right to control one’s health and body, including sexual and reproductive freedom, and the right to be free from interference, such as the right to be free from torture, non-consensual medical treatment and experimentation.

Thus, health is not a public good to be pursued independent of the will of each individual, but requires respect for the will of the individual person with respect to his or her own well-being. This is reinforced by the requirement that health services be culturally acceptable to individuals and communities

2. Informed consent must be guaranteed to persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.. prohibits discrimination in the exercise and enjoyment of the right to health, including on the ground of disability. The freedoms contained in the right to health, as well as the entitlements, are subject to non-discrimination.

The General Comment unfortunately perpetuates discrimination based on disability, by permitting exceptions to be made to the obligation to refrain from coercive medical practices, in the context of “treatment of mental illness or the prevention and control of communicable diseases” such as HIV/AIDS. Such exceptions fail to respect the rights and dignity of persons with psychosocial disabilities and persons living with HIV/AIDS and should not be repeated in this Convention.

Self-determination of persons with disabilities as starting point for informed consent:-
The proposed Supplement to the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, addressing the failure of governments to respect the autonomy of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, provides as follows:-

States should recognize that persons with disabilities have the same right to self-determination as other citizens, including the right to accept or refuse treatment. … States should also ensure that medical facilities and personnel inform people with disabilities of their right to self-determination, including the requirement of informed consent, the right to refuse treatment and the right not to comply with forced admission to institutional facilities. States should also prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and/or corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

The Supplement was developed by the Special Rapporteur on Disability in consultation with a panel of experts formed by international disability organizations, as part of mandated activity to monitor the Standard Rules. These provisions enjoy the support of the disability community and should be considered as a best practice in the establishment of human rights standards. Any exceptions or limitations to the exercise of informed consent by persons with disabilities will be a step backwards.

Legal capacity (capacity to act) underlies the right to informed consent:-
Legal capacity (capacity to act) is a necessary prerequisite for exercise of the right of informed consent by any individual. Without legal capacity, a person remains vulnerable to decisions by other people that may be unacceptable to the individual, and to a process of decision-making that disrespects self-determination and human dignity. In the health context, persons with disabilities face increased vulnerability to unacceptable services due to prejudice about our capabilities, needs, and worth as human beings. For this reason a recognition of legal capacity on an equal basis with others, with supported decision-making as an entitlement that must not undermine legal capacity, is necessary to ensure that informed consent is meaningful for all people with disabilities.

Article 9 addresses legal capacity as a transversal matter in the Convention, relevant to exercise of all rights and freedoms. In article 21, it is sufficient to establish a right to informed consent, without any exceptions or limitations, and leave the resolution of legal capacity to article 9.

5. Access to information

The provision of all health related information is to be timely, meaningful and accessible formats, modes, means and language, including sign language. This is crucially important for people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities.

The extent to which this provision is implemented will directly determine the extent to which people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities will be able to –

* access affordable health care without discrimination, clause 2(a);
* access the same range and standards of health services as others, clause 2(b);
* give informed consent to treatment, clause 2(e);
* access their health and medical records, clause 2(f);
* select treatment options, clause 2(g);
* access information to maximise personal health, clause 2(l).

“Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.’

...

WE REALLY DO NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS

I have personally interviewed vaccinators at three COVID19 Vaccination Centre’s. Each individual vaccinator was questioned “If I have a COVID19 jab will you promise I will not have a serious adverse event or die from receiving the COVID19 jab”? In total 10 vaccinators each informed me that the COVID19 Vaccine is extremely safe.

True informed consent is a process, and, as such, it requires that the health-care provider enter into a discussion that ultimately leads to the patient understanding of their options, and the risks and benefits of the alternative courses of action.

New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 states the ‘Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment. Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.
The New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 is referred to in the COVID19 Public Health Response Act Section 11– The right to refuse to undergo medical treatment.
The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights – There is no particular age at which children or young people may give informed consent under the Code.

A HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO HEALTH:
– Accessibility- non-discrimination, physical accessibility, economic accessibility (affordability), information accessibility.
– Acceptability: respectful of medical ethics and culturally appropriate, sensitive to age and gender
– Quality: scientifically and medically appropriate

All people have the Right to Self-Determination. The historical and current development of the right to self-determination on the basis of the Charter i of the \ United Nations and other instruments adopted by United Nations organs, with particular reference to the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The Charter of the United Nations expressly establishes the right to self-determination.
Guaranteeing informed consent is fundamental to achieving the enjoyment of the right to health through practices, policies and research that are respectful of autonomy, self-determination and human dignity. Safeguarding informed consent along the health-care continuum is an obligation placed on States and third parties

The concept of consent has evolved for centuries to arrive at its current meaning. In the aftermath of the Nuremberg Trials, increased international recognition of patients’ rights developed in the twentieth century, hence defining the responsibility of health-care providers and States responsibilities to the patient.

In 1947, the Nuremberg Code asserted that the voluntary consent of the human subject to medical research is necessary under all circumstances. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) further developed the Code principles and tied them to the ethical duties of physicians, as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948).
In 1994, the World Health Organization Amsterdam Declaration on Patients’ Rights required informed consent as a prerequisite for any medical intervention, guaranteeing also the right to refuse or halt medical interventions.

Informed consent is not mere acceptance of a medical intervention, but a voluntary and sufficiently informed decision, protecting the right of the patient to be involved in medical decision-making, and assigning associated duties and obligations to health-care providers. Its ethical and legal normative justifications stem from its promotion of patient autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and well-being.

I am extremely concerned that young people in New Zealand can legally consent to participating in Clinical Trials without prior parental or guardianship consent. That they can also book a COVID19 jab online, or just turn up at a COVID19 Vaccination Centre, and are not be required to provide identification of proof of age.

The randomised Pfizer Clinical Trial (Human Experiments) was of 2,260 12 – 15year olds from across America. 50% of them were jabbed with a placebo, only 1,130 actually received the COVID19 jab. This is a very tiny percentage of the population within this age group considering there are almost 17 million 12-15 year olds in America alone and only 1,130 participants were required for FDA to give consent.

COVID 19 so called vaccines are not vaccines, they are inoculations. They do not stop infection, they are an immune treatment.
I am extremely concerned for our young people who have the legal right to consent to be participants in these human trials, human experiments. (12-15yrs old).
DHB’s are trying to get schools on board for onsite vaccination clinics.

Chris Hipkins has reported that COVID19 Vaccinations for children from the age of 5years will be rolled out by the end of January 2022 as FDA have given Pfizer provisional consent for these inoculations, they are just awaiting MEDSAFE approval.

Globally populations are being controlled by a Communist Chinese type Social Credit System of Rewards and Punishments, compliant or non-compliant our freedoms, human ights, civil liberties have been severely violated, it now appears that all these Human Rights just simply, sadly disappeared. We really do not have any Human Rights.

NOTE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO.

...

NOWHERE TO RUN AND NOWHERE TO HIDE.

The Imperial Global Public-Private Corporate Governance of the Planet namely Earth. The Eco-Political Global Elite (The Green Leftist-Socialist-Communist Global Powerhouse)

The Corporate capture of global governance : The World Economic Forum – UN partnership agreement is a dangerous threat to all living beings on the earth. Digital Globalization, digital Data, digital control of global populations. A Multistakeholder business governance, nationally-globally is being played out, has been planned for years, the end is in sight. The emerging powers in this Global imperialist global governance.

A group of rising powers from the global South is effectively challenging western predominance, the hallmark of the global order over the last two centuries. CIGI’s research is built on long term transnational networking that brings together high-ranking scholars from the industrialized and the developing worlds. The redistribution of wealthy and the end of private property rights.

THIS IS TOO SAD, TOO CRUEL IT MUST NEVER BE…..
Where have all the farmers gone..long time passing.
Where have all the tradies gone…long time passing…
Where have all the small businesses gone…long time passing
Where have all our freedoms gone….long time passing.

WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND NOW

...