Refers to a Parliamentary Debate of MPS in the UK on the extremely important topic of the COVID19 Jabs  being Safe & Effective and what do these words actually mean. The problem being the corruption of language and changing its meaning. The Science is don’t think for yourself (You know- Arderns Only One Source Of Truth) Oh and do we really want these Anti-vaxers to have an open debate (of course not) Eem the Jabber Jabber Catch phrase being Safe & Effective

The coined phrase ‘Safe & Effective must have travelled around the world millions of times.. hear it often enough it becomes normalized and without the Truth becomes the – Only One Source Of Truth in the whole dam world. Becomes ingrained in our National psyche.. never to question the questionable. But asking questions is a vital part of Scientic and Political Debate .. The Propaganda Machine of Mainstream Media pandering to Political Tyranny.   Eeem it became to risky to question the Science. It became far too risky for Doctors of Medicine to actually be allowed to speak up. Speak Up get struck off by the Medical Council. Speak up publically get arrested. Police at the door. Bottle shops open and Butchers shops closed. The masses in face masks like Egyptian Slaves. Keeping everyone Safe eem Nah .. Keeping everyone controlled.

Lockdowns- shut downs of schools and businesses, loss of Jobs..elderly people isolated in nursing homes. Not all friends and relatives could attend loved ones funerals.  Antifa and Black Lives Matter could walk- march shoulder to shoulder in the thousands. But you had to be socially isolated. Several metre’s apart. Post COVID 19 the States Wrecking Ball. And lets add Mass Migration to our Health System. The Guinea Pig State of the worlds populations. Free From Risk- Free From Harm (Never) This has never been qualified its just words sucked into your psyche.  All medicines have the potential of side effects. But this wasn’t a medicine. The Spike Protein time and time again has been reported by Medical Specialist of many years of experience, qualifications have said that the Spike Protein does not stay in the muscle of the arm that its injected into.  Travels to major organs in the body. And does various serious harms and causes premature deaths. We will never know how many deaths that COVID19 Pfizer Jab caused as the coverups continue. But the truth is being revealed- we are looking at what looks like genocidal acts and very serious harms.

The UN Ministry Of Health Blue Guide Document details the legislation controlling how medicines are advertised in the UK. States that ‘ That its unacceptable to say that all medicines are safe, they all have a potential for side effects and no medicine is Risk Free as individual patients respond differently to treatment. The Pharmaceutical Industries own Self Regulatory Code Of Practice which states the word ‘Safe’ must not be  used without  qualifications on this basis . Therefore here we have Big Pharma breaking its own Regulatory Code of Safe Practice. Entire population right across the world have been misled.

As Governments, Heads of States, Organizations, Academia. Misled entire nations to be guineapigs for an unsafe ineffective jab, overstating efficacy  of the COVID Jabs through Social Media- Main Stream News.. Daily Reports on TV and Radio- Signs everywhere you look. Markings on the ground- social distancing. The images were sucked into memory holes of billions of people worldwide.  The totalitarian discourse of the State and State Policing.  Safe & Effective was picked up and acted upon globally . It was aggressively acted upon.  (A person got shot by a policeman- he died of COVID 19). The Window of Deception (BIAS) Swapping the jabbed group with the Non Jabbed Group) The corruption is Evil.

New Zealander Barry Young stands in Wellington Court once again. Brave and Courageous Barry. He is quietly intellectual man whom stands by the truth. Prayers for you Barry. You are a Hero. He is accused of stealing Te Whatu Ora COVID 19 data. Of cause they want to criminalize Barry.. Shut him Up. Silence him. Does Barry have whistleblower protections?? And NO Barry Did not publish personal data on peoples names .. it was purely Data. Barry’s protected disclosure (Whistleblowers) hearing will take place on 11th December, starting around 10am, at the Wellington District Court. I know there will be some loving supporters there for Barry.  God Bless you Barry. Thank you Liz Gunn for opening this up to NZrs and many people across the world. I know it has not been easy for you, and that physical  attack on you at Auckland Airport

The Outcome of the court case for Barry on the 11^th December could determine whether anyone in the Commonwealth is allowed to expose the States wrongdoing. His case has become a global test of transparency, accountability, and the public’s right to the truth. Young was the sole administrator of New Zealand’s pay-per-dose vaccination database. When he saw a sharp rise in deaths following COVID vaccination, he released anonymized data with zero personal identifiers because the public deserved answers… Now prosecutors want to deny him whistleblower status by saying he lacked “expert credentials,” even though their own expert never examined the full dataset. If they win, it becomes a model for silencing whistleblowers worldwide.

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

Doctor John Campbell’s interview with Dr Panageis December 5^th 2025.  Exposing Dr Panageis Study and ‘The  All Cause Of Mortality’ in the Italian Region of Emilia-Romagna.  As to the cases of hospitalizations, infections, deaths occurring within a certain  ‘Window’ after the 1^st Dose of the jab were often allocated to the ‘Unvaccinated Group’ Therefore artificially increased the mortality rate in the vaxed group (reducing this in the vaxed group). Leading to an overestimation of vax effectiveness. (Of  course this will be called misinformation/ disinformation of Anti vaxers)

This article referred to was received 26/6/2025 (Art 2562972) Accepted 7/9/2025 and Published Online 3^rd November 2025 – Includes Real World Studies

References are made to the COVID 19 Vaccine effectiveness and the  ‘Suffering from Biases’- the ‘Distorting’ of  Results and the correcting of ‘Immortal Time Bias’s  as to All Deaths of the Vaccinated compared to the Unvaccinated. Thus  highlighting the  so called ‘Case Counting Window Bias’ of the Vaccinated  and  the Non-Vaccinated Recipients. And the  distorting  of the validity of results. Dr Panageis called the Statistical Trick. Technically speaking this is a case of the  ‘Counting Window Bias’

Where collected Data concerns as to the entire population of the Italian region in question (Both sexes and All Ages) and  ‘Daily All Cause Deaths’  for each age class from 27^th December 2020 (Launch of the COVID 19 Jab) in Italy to the 31^st December 2021. (Data was publicly available, updated monthly on the ISTAT Website, released under Creative Commons – 4.0 License). This consisted of a database with the Date of Birth *Date of All Causes of Death * Dates of each Vaccine  Event of those receiving at least their 1^st Jab ( Then calculating the daily number of deaths of vaxed people for each Age Class, and then the Unvaccinated  for each Age Class of the Population in question (The Italian Region)

Dr Panegeis explained that In the first 14days in this ‘Time Window’ all ‘Vaccinated People’ were considered as ‘Unvaccinated’ . Thus it was considered ‘Unvaccinated’ people were effected by adverse reactions. Those individuals (Groups) with infections and hospitalizations were moved to that group of the ‘Unvaccinated’ Group.. this then created an artificial increase in death rate of the unvaccinated that had actually been ‘Vaccinated’.

Individuals were counted as Unvaccinated (not as being vaccinated) . The Vaccinated individuals would be counted as Unvaccinated  hence the  death rate of the (artificial) Unvaccinated individuals (group) would be much higher… And the death rate in the (artificial)  Vaccinated group  would look much lower.                                       Therefore making the COVID 19 Jab look more effective and safe. It is also seen as if the Death Rates goes down in the (artificial) Vaccinated group and in the (artificial) Unvaccinated group increases.(goes up)

Data was obtained on December 2023 by Lawyer Lorenzo Melacarne, whom submitted a request for access to public documents for the Emilia-Romagna Region in Italy. Which allowed the following information to be disclosed publicly (The Data of Covid 19 Vaccinated mortality data containing the dates of the 1^st  and 2^nd Vaccination and further vaccine doses received by recipients.

This  Data was used to identify the Vaccinated and Unvaccinated  people that were considered Vaccinated. Those that did and did not receive vaccines                                         The only age groups  studied were the 50 to 59 yr aged group  *60-69  aged group and the  70 to 79 age group  were analyzed.

Time windows were as follows:-   70–79 age group, the start of the time window was set for March 15, 2021 and the end for May 24, 2021;

* 60–69 age group, the start of the time window was set for April 19, 2021 and the end for June 23, 2021;

*50–59 age group, the start of the time window was set for May 7, 2021 and the end for July 12^th 2021.

Dr Panageis had already partaken in a study on ‘Systemic Absorption of the Lipid Nano Particles’ that would take RNA all around the body. Stating that the Spike Protein could be expressed on cells all around the body hence damaging cells throughout the body. Dr Panageis said that this was always predictable that the lipid nano particles would do as he had predicted himself some time ago

This Study by Dr Panageis certainly makes you wonder if all ages etc. have been part of this – across All Nations worldwide were part of this what would be the true (factual) deaths in reality of the Vaccinated Recipients?  .. Using this Italian Study of  ‘Suffering from Biases’- the ‘Distorting’ of  Results and the  ‘Immortal Time Bias’s  as to ‘All Deaths of the (artificial) Vaccinated’ compared to the (artificial) ‘Unvaccinated’… The highlighted  ‘Case Counting Window Bias’ of the Vaccinated  and  the Non-Vaccinated Recipients. The Distortions and Invalidity of Results (The Statistical Trick). I have shared the links below:-

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

LINKS  (https://youtu.be/3bWJEFZEsko?si=EKCMN-dS10Omj2Pr)

(https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2562972#d1e716)

Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian region Emilia-Romagna *Marco Alessandria *,  *Giovanni Trambusti  * Giovanni Maria Malatesta  *Panagis Polykretis

(https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2562972).

TABLE TOP EXERCISES ARE DESCRIBED AS A NORMAL TOOL OF PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION & RESPONSE.. Several have already been acted out for International purposes at the  John Hopkins Centre For Health Bloomberg Public Health Center. Partners of the Center include :- Independent research & analysists. Supported by governments worldwide, foundations- funders and partners  etc., To name a few:- Open Society Foundations (George Soros) * World Health Org., (UN) WHO *Bell & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation* CEC * FDA and many more. The John Hopkins Centre was founded in 1998 by D A Henderson as a first Global-Govt Organization

JOHN HOPKINS – BLOOMBERG SCHOOLS OF PUBLIC HEALTH- CENTER FOR HEALTH SECURITY FUNDERS AND PARTNERS INCLUDE.. The Center conducts independent research and analysis, and our work is supported by government, foundations, and gifts. We are grateful for the generous support from our funders and partners. To study the vulnerability of US Civilian population to Biological Weapons. 25 plus years on the John Hopkins Health Security Bloomberg School’ s focus in ‘Severe Pandemics that threaten Our World

George Soros- Open Society Foundations *WHO *John Hopkins  * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation *Robert Wood Johnson Foundation U ASPR (Assistat Secretary for Prepared and Response *CDC *Homeland Security *FDA *DTRA *Alfred Sloan Foundation * de Beaument Foundation * Smith Richardson The Center was founded in 1998 by D.A. Henderson as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent, prepare, and respond to their consequences.

Between 1992- 2002 Published papers in Jama Medical Management of Biological Agents  *1999- 2000 Organized 2 National Symposia on Medical Health Response & Bio-terrorism *2001 was highly influential in government decisions to purchase a UN national Smallpox stockpile *2002 Became involved in the Guidance for Hospital and Communities in the US on Pandemic Preparedness Hospital Programmes *2003 Led & shaped US National efforts to engage the public in epidemic & disaster response policies & programs. Launched their 1st Peer Reviewed Journal in this field. Consequently Bioterrorism & Biosecurity was later renamed Health Security. In 2004 John Hopkins Health Security Centre’s research provoked US Policy of ‘Dual Use Research’. Startups publishing annual Health Security  federal funded articles. Which were used by the Media *Government to understand Bio-defense & Health Security

2006 John Hopkins Centre’s analysis * advocacy helped to form the ‘Pandemic & All-Hazards Preparedness Act and the Bio-medical Advanced Research & Development Authority (BARDA) *2011 John Hopkins Centre published its first ‘Nuclear Preparedness Guidance’ aimed at Public Health, medical and Civic Leader in the Rad Resilient City Initiative

2006 The John Hopkins Center analysis and advocacy helped to inform the framework for the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act, as well as the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

2011 Published first nuclear preparedness guidance aimed at public health, medical, and civic leaders in the Rad Resilient City initiative. The initiative providing cities & their neighbors with a checklist of ‘preparedness actions’ following a nuclear detonation. Also provided leaders a Checklist of Preparedness’ as to the risk of terrorism

2012 John Hopkins created their first International Fellowship Program focused on building Bio-security leadership.. And a first effort report on how to allocate resources during a Pandemic. * In 2013 they helped lead-develop the US National Health Security Preparedness Index. (The first State to State Index on Health Preparedness)

2013-2014: John Hopkins Centre participated in debate referring to ‘Gain Of Function’-Potential Pathogen Research. This resulted in US Govt funding and a new US Policy *2014-2016 Established Track 2 – S E Asian-US & India -US Biosecurity dialogues * 2017 Published their first working paper in the field of ‘defining global catastrophic biological risks- catalyzing a new focus on these issues *John Hopkins Health Centre- Bloomberg School of Health Security are also well known worldwide for their famous ‘Table Top- Simulation Exercises. (1) 2001 ‘Dark Winter Exercise- Depicting a smallpox attack on the US- which led the US Govt to stockpile Smallpox Vaccines

The 2005 ‘Atlantic Storm’ Table-top simulation Exercise focusing on the Inter-dependence that is demonstrated among International Communities in the face of Epidemics & Biological Weapons. * Another John Hopkins Centre Exercise namely ‘CLADEX’ in 2018. Was a major table-top exercise on major political and policy decision making that would emerge if a global catastrophic biological event was to occur.

The one I find most interesting is John Hopkins Bloomberg Centre For Health Security – namely EVENT 201’ which took place on October 18th 2019. Only e months before the emergence of the COVID19 Pandemic. Of course Fact Checkers- and the usual participants- NGO’s- Govts etc., have said “Nothing to See Here- Its nothing to do with the emergence of the COVID 19 Pandemic”

The 18th October 2019 ‘201’ Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was held at the Pierre Hotel in New York. The audience was by invite only (A livestream audience) Which has Video coverage on You Tube which can be viewed. The Tabletop exercise for the Global Pandemic was organized by the John Hopkins Center For Health Security, the World Economic Forum and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Funded by the ‘Open Philanthropy Project’

The Players (Actors) that participated in the Event 201 Table Top Exercise were individuals from Global Businesses, Govt & Public Health and involved Sofia Borges UN Foundation Senior Director at the New York Head Office of the UN * Dr Chris Elias -President of the Global Development Programme of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Dr Chris Elias serves as the President and CEO of PATH, an International non-profit organization and various other Advisory Boards including the Advisory Committee to the Director of the CDC & the Washington Global Health External Advisory Board. Also a Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Other participating actors of the ‘Global Pandemic Table-Top Exercise Event’ include Timothy Evans (McGill University. Associate Dean of the School Of Population and Global Health in the Faculty of Medicine & Associate Vice Principle of the Global Policy and Innovation. Has a important role at the World Bank Group (The Nutrition, Health Population Global Practice)

Timothy Evans joined McGill University in September 2019 as the Inaugural Director and Associate Dean of the School of Population and Global Health (SPGH) in the Faculty of Medicine and Associate Vice-Principal (Global Policy and Innovation). He joined McGill after a 6-year tenure as the Senior Director of the Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice at the World Bank Group.

A Representative of WHO (World Health Org, UN). Dr Evans who was Assistant Director General of WHO from 2003-2010. He is at the forefront for the last 20 years advancing Global Health Equity & Global Health Systems. Leading the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Also over-seeing the production of the annual World Health Report (UN) A Co-Founder of many partnerships, including the Global Alliance on Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI). He led the China CDC Team from September to November 2013 in the fights against Ebola

Participants of the Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 included Representatives of the UN in various Global Initiatives* Representative from Vodafone Foundation *ANZ Bank *Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Representative  *WEF Representation *Global Business Advisory Leader * Lufthansa Group Airlines * UPS Foundation *A major Media Company* A member of the Monetary Authority of Singapore *Global Health Johnson & Johnson

The Global Pandemic Exercise concluded with Recommendation including a Call of Action for Public-Private Partnerships for a Global Pandemic Preparedness Response. The John Hopkins Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was played out like it was in reality the pending Global Pandemic with all the mandatory Restrictions. Involved Radio and TV Broadcasting. Mis-Disinformation Campaigns.

Economic and societal impacts- social consequences- suffering. Unpresented levels of collaboration between govts, international organizations and the Private Sector. Lockdowns, social distancing. The challenges posed by the populations. A new robust form of public-private cooperation to address the pandemic. Proposals were made by WEF * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation * John Hopkins Centre for Health Security

This included Govts international organizations, business, have essential corporate capabilities to be utilized on a very large scale during the Pandemic. Stating public sectors will be over-whelmed. Economic losses. Social Media, communications systems, global news media needed to enable govts emergency response. Operational partnerships between govt responses

WHO currently had a influenza vaccine stockpile with contracts to pharmaceutical companies that they agreed to supply during a global Pandemic. WHOs ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need. WHO R& D Blueprint Pathogens to be deployed in clinical trials during outbreaks in collaborations with CEPT, GAVI and WHO with Bi- or multinational agreements

* Cancelling of travel by Air & by Sea. International Aviation and Shipping *Border measures. Leading to unjustified border measures. Fear & uncertainty. Severely affecting Employment, businesses.. global supplies of products etc., Vaccine deaths are absent.

November 19th 2019 WEF article on managing Risk & Impact of Guture Pandemics. Also a Private Sector Roundtable- A Global Agenda 19th November 2011. 12th May 2019 WEF Peter Sands. Outbreak – Readiness and Business Impact. Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global economy.( WEF)

Also includes references to – The Center’s scholars researched these topics to inform the scenario.CAPS: The Pathogen and Clinical Syndrome (PDF) *Communication in a pandemic (PDF) *Event 201 Model (PDF) *Finance in a pandemic (PDF) *Medical countermeasures (PDF)

All reported as a fictional unplanned Global COVID 19 Pandemic outbreak but it was played out as if in reality 18th October 2019 prior to COVID19 global emergence. Also recommended was the SPARS Pandemic 2015-2028 Table-top exercise at the John Hopkins Centre For Health and Security (October 2017) A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators

Recommended Citation Schoch-Spana M, Brunson EK, Shearer MP, Ravi S, Sell TK, Chandler H, Gronvall GK. The SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; October 2017.

This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional

LINK TO THE ‘ECHO CHAMBER’ SPARS PANDEMIC 2025- 2028 (https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf)

https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise

OTHER LINKS OF INTEREST: 1 Global Health Security: Epidemics Readiness Accelerator. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/projects/managing-the-risk-and-impact-of-future-epidemics. Accessed 11/19/19

2 Private Sector Roundtable. Global health Security Agenda. https://ghsagenda.org/home/joining-the-ghsa/psrt/. Accessed 11/19/19

3 Peter Sands. Outbreak readiness and business impact: protecting lives and livelihoods across the global economy. World Economic Forum 2019. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/outbreak-readiness-and-business-impact-protecting-lives-and-livelihoods-across-the-global-economy. Accessed 12/5/19

https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response/

https://www.cni.org/topics/special-collections/event-201-why-werent-we-paying-attention

https://science.feedback.org/review/simulation-exercises-such-as-catastrophic-contagion-normal-part-pandemic-preparedness-dont-predict-future-pandemics/

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

DefendNZ Sought from the (OIA) Official Information  Act from the Ministry Of Health, which is reported by DefendNZ has left National Party Simon O’Connor disappointed but not surprised as the Ministry of Health says that patients with COVID19 could be eligible for euthanasia, assisted suicide in New Zealand. As in the light of the serious deficiencies in David Seymour’\s ‘End Of Life Choice Act (EOLCA) concerns have been raised by healthcare professionals.

COVID19 IN RELATION TO EUTHANASIA: The OIA Request asked the following question: “Could patients who are severely hospitalized with COVID19 potentially be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Act if a health professional viewed their prognosis less than 6 months”?” The Defender NZ wanted clarity from the Ministry Of Health about this issue. The Defender refers to the precarious position when it comes to COVID19 and hospital resources and what could result in pressure to utilize euthanasia and assisted suicide as tools to resolve such a serious crisis, as overseas commentators had raised the prospect of unethical motivations since early in the pandemic. The Defender referred to the tragic case of a Canadian woman who had an assisted suicide to avoid another COVID19 lockdowns, thus highlighting exactly why caution is warranted in relation to COVID and euthanasia.

TERMINAL ILLNESS IS SUBJECTIVE: The lack -of stringent safeguards of Seymours Euthanasia Act has raised red flags, I myself in researching the Act have seen that there are some dangerous concepts in this Act. Therefore it appears to me its quite creditable to seek a response to this question through OIA to the Ministry Of Health, especially where there are vulnerable elderly people isolated and in lockdown, not seeing family, a situation that no-one has ever envisaged would happen. The Ministry of Health responded to the Defender on Tuesday 17^th December 2021. The response was “There are clear eligibility criteria for assisted dying. This includes that a person must have a terminal illness that is LIKELY to end their life within 6 months.  Then the response goes onto say “A terminal illness is most often a prolonged illness where treatment is not effective. (the EOLC Act states that ‘eligibility is determined by the attending medical practitioner (AMP) and an independent practitioner. These are the serious concerns that have been raised “Firstly there is nothing CONCRETE about the PHRASE  ‘MOST OFTEN” in fact its inclusion in this specific context clearly suggests that the Ministry Of Health considers the definition of ‘TERMINAL ILLNESS’ to be ‘subjective’ and’ open to interpretation’. The next sentence on the MOH response appears to back this up, the MOH considers the attending medical practitioner (AMP)  and the independent medical practitioner to be empowered by the EOLCA to make the determination about ‘what does and does not qualify as a terminal illness’

PROLONGED ILLNESS: The Defender concludes “In the light of the vague interpretation, it is reasonable to suggest that COVID19 could be classed as a terminal illness depending on the prognosis of the patient and the subjective judgements of the AMP and independent medical practitioner. “This feels like we are being sold one thing and been delivered another”, said a spokesperson from The DefenderNZ.  In the final paragraph the Ministry Of Health added “Eligibility is determined by a case by case basis, therefore the Ministry cannot make definitive statements about who is eligible. In some cases a person with COVID19 may be eligible for assisted dying” The term ‘PROLONGED DESEASE’ is extremely fraught and highly subjective in nature. How does the Medical Practitioners determine an illness is a prolonged illness, and that persons life will end in 6 months, many medical professionals have been wrong in determining the time that a person life is going to end.  DefendNZ had created a petition to Parliament calling for urgent amendments to the Euthanasia Act. Scoop NZ reported 19^th December 2021 An Official Information Act reply to #DefendNZ, from the Ministry of Health, which says that patients with COVID-19 could be eligible for euthanasia, has left National MP Simon O’Connor disappointed but not surprised., this news article confirmed Defend NZ concerns

CATEGORIZING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: The Scoop News Article includes:- The End of Life Choice Act doesn’t offer any clarity or robust safeguards that would put this matter beyond doubt. Instead it does just the opposite, leaving the door wide open for abuse. When we put this matter to National MP Simon O’Connor, he expressed concerns about what clearly seems to be an expansion of the new law less than a month after it came into force. “When New Zealanders voted in the referendum in 2020, did they anticipate the law could be used for COVID-19 patients? The wording of the law was always deliberately broad and interpretable, placing far too much into the judgement of the doctor.” In 2022 the government made changes to the Health Practitioner Status as to how a qualified health practitioner can carry out some activities that they could not before, these activities prior to this could only be done by a medical practitioner. Changes across eight Acts amend references to medical practitioners to include health practitioners including nurse practitioners, registered nurses and, in one instance, pharmacist prescribers. By replacing the term ‘medical practitioner’, other health practitioners who are suitably qualified will be able to use the full range of their skills and training in treating people.

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS COMPETENCE: Nursing is a regulated profession, and it is important that nurses understand the requirements of regulation, their obligations under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance (HPCA) Act 2003 and what this means in terms of their professional responsibility and accountability. It is the responsibility of every nurse to know and understand the legislative frameworks they work within. The Health Practitioners’ Competence Assurance Act was passed in September 2003 and has undergone several amendments since then. The HPCA Act (2003) was developed in response to: very public examples of medical error; demands from lobbyists to make health professionals more accountable and respect health care consumers’ rights; needing to streamline some of the bureaucratic processes by having main health professional groups under one piece of legislation; needing to update older legislation, like the 1977 Nurses’ Act. The principal purpose of the Act is to protect the health and safety of members of the public by providing for mechanisms to ensure that health practitioners are competent and fit to practice their professions.

The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance (HPCA) Act (2003) includes provisions that:- Prohibit persons who are not qualified to be registered as health practitioners of a profession from claiming or implying to be health practitioners of that profession.   *Prohibit persons other than registered health practitioners of a profession with current practicing certificates from claiming to be practicing the profession.    *Prohibit health practitioners from practicing their professions without current practicing certificates or from practicing their professions outside their scopes of practice.   *Authorize the making of Orders in Council restricting the provision of the whole or part of certain health services to health practitioners who are permitted to perform those activities by their scopes of practice.

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL: The Act also sets out conditions a health professional must meet in order to practice; provides mechanisms for improving the competence of health practitioners to provide protection from practitioners who practice below that required standard of competence or are unable to perform the functions required; provides for each regulatory authority to establish a professional conduct committee to investigate complaints about health practitioners; and provides for the establishment of a single tribunal, called the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, to hear charges brought by the Director of Proceedings or by a professional conduct committee against a practitioner. Professions currently regulated by the Act (2003) include: Chinese medicine services  *Chiropractic    *Medicine    *Dentistry  *Occupational therapy   *Optometry and optical dispensing  *Nursing *Midwifery  *Medical imaging and radiation therapy   *Dietetics  *Medical laboratory science. Anesthetic technology    *Osteopathy   *Paramedic services    *Pharmacy   *Physiotherapy   *Podiatry   *Psychology and psychotherapy.

MIDAZOLAM INJECTIONS AND DEATHS: NZ Herald reported  11^th July 2023 that a NZ Health worker is under investigation for raising assisted suicide with a suicidal patient. It was one of eight complaints made to the Health and Disability Commission about the Assisted Dying Service in the last year. So far, no one involved in the service had broken the law. ResearchGate reported January 2023 there were excess deaths in the UK: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID 19 Pandemic. It was found that a spike in deaths were not caused by COVID19 this was largely absent but was due to Midazolam injections, with excess of all deaths in England during 2020.  The widespread use of Midazolam in the UK suggests a possible policy of systemic  euthanasia. Australia at this time were assessing the statical impact of COVID19 injections on excess deaths which is reported to be relatively straight forward. It was reported that the iatrogenic pandemic in the UK was caused by euthanasia deaths from Midazolam and also it is highly likely caused by COVID19 injections.  It was through spikes shown in stats at the time when elderly people were given Midazolam and COVID jabs that this was determined by researchers. (through Macro data)

MORE PEOPLE DIE THAN NEEDED TO DIE: Dr John Campbell in his You Tube video explains why there is a question mark around Euthanasia and End Of live and Assisted Suicide. Did more people die from the Pandemic than needed to die?  Dr Campbell says there is a serious National question in the UK as to what the UK apply to the Pandemic and ongoing into the future “did more people die in the Pandemic than needed to die  and did some people die as a result of the medical interventions that were recommended at the time. (Dr Campbell shows the spikes in several graphs of deaths). He speaks of the guidelines around breathlessness referring to an opioid and a benzodiazepine an opium based drug like morphine and the bendo-benzodiazepine as they talk about this as namely midazolam, this is usually used for those dying of cancer so that they have a peaceful death. Dr Camerson says under these situations all is ok but for an infection such as COVID19 this is fundamentally a mistake that was made in the transfer guidelines . Medication used at the end of life and assisted dying for an infection that most people can get completely better from

JABBING THE ELERLY WHO ARE FRAIL: Here in New Zealand Newshub reported on 18^th January 2021 ‘COVID19” No cause for alarm after 29 elderly people die in Norway following Pfizer jab- says expert’. The Norwegian Medicines Agency said in a statement some common reactions to the vaccine may have contributed to their deaths, which was to be expected in frail patients. University of Auckland vaccinologist Helen Petousis-Harris said there’s no indication the two are linked and the virus itself poses a much greater threat to the age bracket.. However she also added  I think this is something that we have expected,” she told Newshub. “When you start vaccinating the extremely elderly – these are very, very frail people – you are, by chance, going to see deaths occurring shortly after.”. The deaths prompted the Norwegian Institute of Public Health to suggest in a statement the vaccines may be too risky for the very elderly and terminally ill. “As a result, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has updated the COVID-19 vaccination guide with more detailed advice on vaccinating the elderly who are frail. “Several reports of suspected adverse reactions are received on a daily basis and are continuously assessed.”. The New Zealand Government has signed agreements with a total of four companies to secure enough vaccine doses for its entire population, with the rollout expected to begin in the second quarter of this year.

COVID POSITIVE TEST DETERMINES COVID MORTALITY UN NATION STATES (WHO): Mainstream media including RNZ and also Ministry of Health NZ reported that the measuring and reporting of COVID19 deaths had changed. The Ministry of Health that week reported deaths of COVID19  at (25^th March 2022)  But these figures are not transparent there is another story behind the figures reported. The way COVID19 deaths were being recorded had changed. It was early in the March that Ashley Bloomfield announced a change in the reporting of COVID19 mortality rates in NZ. From the 10^th March onwards deaths were to  be automatically reported if a person died within 28 days of a positive COVID19 test result. This same system was to be used worldwide as a request from the World Health Organization (UN). So if some-one died of a vehicle accident, had been shot be the police, or any other category of death is they had been tested for COVID and the test came up positive then they were categorized as dying of COVID19. Of course this can hide the  COVID jab mortality as well also suicide deaths and other deaths for any other reason. Thus having the ability to hide a raft of serious concerns around health and the way people have been treated. Michael Baker Otago epidemiologist said it was worth considering how valis some of the cases listed as deaths of COVID 19 are. Baker referred this to being a broad definition. Baker says it’s worth having a “healthy suspicion for every bit of data

INCREASING THE FEAR AND BOOSTING THE JABS: University of Canterbury Covid-19 modeler professor Michael Plank says people who died within 28 days of testing positive is a “number that you can easily count, and you can provide quickly. Saying there’s an increasing likelihood that some of those deaths will be what’s called incidental, which means that yes they died within 28 days of a positive test but the cause of death was actually unrelated”. Baker said “this is a simple death count] is a key indicator that a disease … is having an impact” As to ‘Vaccination status of deaths within 28 days of being reported as a case stating PLEASE NOTE: The Ministry of Health states the number of deaths of partially vaccinated people are too small to provide additional detail of for privacy reasons. But again I say this form of counting  COVID19 deaths can hide a mirage of other deaths including that of Jab Deaths. 3st March 2022 The NZ Herald reported that COVID19 “What we know and what we don’t know about NZ Virus Deaths. It was reported that COVID19 deaths would rise and remain high, but experts say a dearth of detailed data is clouding the picture of just who is becoming severely sick and who is dying from COVID19 and refers to deaths as in COVId19 positive test and people dying within 28 days of the test being positive and dying in that period of time

WHERE’S THE DATA? The Chief Coroner’s office told the Herald this week it was investigating 25 active cases where the deceased person tested positive at death, with no determinations yet made in any of them. No data was available to offer a breakdown of what variants and subvariants were involved in the deaths. Director general of health Dr Ashley Bloomfield said the number of deaths linked to Covid-19 appeared to be rising – Generally, however, O’Neale and Harvey said analyzing the precise risk of death and hospitalization in New Zealand by vaccination status was difficult, given a lack of publicly reported data from the Ministry of Health. Then there has been a number of hacks reported by mainstream news of health data and coroners records, thousands of coronial files and health files. For me red flags are flying.17th January 2023 Stuff NZ ‘Hacked NZ Information published on the dark web. (14,500 Coronial files and 4,000 post mortem reports). Te Whatu Ora hacked files hacked health data and coronial inquest files hacked. TRANSPARENCY ZILCH. RED FLAGS. HOW EASILY HEALTH RECORDS, AND CORONIAL FILES – INFORMATION CAN SIMPLY DISAPPEAR INTO THE DARK WEB-

RESEARCHER: Carol Sakey

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BqbVo2sQi0

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/463975/measuring-and-reporting-covid-19-deaths-what-you-need-to-know

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/new-zealand-health-worker-under-investigation-for-raising-assisted-dying-with-a-suicidal-patient/TGZK3JCR5VBUNOAVGWDSBPOST4/

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2112/S00446/moh-says-kiwis-with-covid-19-can-be-eligible-for-euthanasia.htm

https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministry/legislation-and-regulation/changes-health-practitioner-status

https://www.defendnz.co.nz/news-media/2021/12/19/exclusive-euthanasia-expansion-moh-says-kiwis-with-covid-19-can-now-be-eligible