Dear Prime Minister, Minister of Health, MedSAFE General Manager, Director General of Health, Police Commissioner, major party leaders, President of RNZCGP, Human Rights Commissioner, Ombudsman, Chief Coroner, Chairman of the MCNZ, Chairman of the DCNZ, all Members of Parliament.

Urgent Open Letter on the latest clear proof of multiple modes of harm from the COVID-19 injections. 

Summary of published research from the last 3 months.

Since we last wrote to update you variously on the confirmation and mechanisms of widespread harm from the COVID-19 vaccine products, more research and disclosures have become public, each of which we summarize for you briefly in this letter. It is urgent that you act to cease the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts immediately.

In case you can read no further, an expert symposium has reported this week, based on published peer-reviewed research, that Comirnaty contains, along with heavy DNA contamination, a promoter code from a known cancer-causing virus called SV40. Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines.  We have posted on the broader concerns and very troubling evidence on cancer particularly. Here is one world renowned oncologist describing the harm he sees, and another cancer specialist here.

Of concern, too, many patients have ongoing vaccine spike protein production in their blood after 6 months according to new research from Italy. So much for “all gone in a few days”.

Also, it is clear that the final product is NOT the version that Pfizer submitted to the world’s regulators for approval. Here is the BMJ paper of concern, and an interview with the author, who discusses the substantial changes in production processes, which does make them different products, by any usual standards of medicines regulation.

We note you remain in denial about, or resistant to, the notion of any harm from the jab program, which continues into vulnerable demographics – particularly young adults, children and unborn babies who are all at minimal risk, if any, from COVID-19 infection. There is clear evidence from around the world of mortality harm from the gene products, here for instance and rising proof that early treatments could save lives if doctors who tried to use them hadn’t been threatened and persecuted.

Our prior calls to your integrity, public duty, common sense and self-preservation have failed to stop both the continued hawking of dangerous genetic technologies onto our citizens, and the hiding of the resultant toll of deaths and severe injuries. Irrespective of any efficacy at all (only negative so far) these contaminated jabs contain a witch’s brew of known and unknown substances. There is enormous batch to batch variability with regard to incidence and types of adverse events as we have described previously. That they contain undisclosed ingredients ought to be enough to end this letter here, confident that action would follow. However, denial, wilfull blindness or lazy deference to “government experts” continue to writ large in Wellington.

Ongoing synthetic gene injections into a vulnerable population in the foreknowledge of inevitable deaths and injuries to come is surely a crime (even if protections may be promised to complicit individuals by people in power). The Crimes Act is highly explicit about what constitutes criminal behaviour.

Our multiple letters to you, and ongoing public posts here at NZDSOS, broaden the evidence available so that you cannot claim any statutory protection from having made fair and reasonable decisions on merely limited (government-sanctioned) information.

It is clear that protecting children and pregnant women and their babies, at least, is no longer an ethical bar of interest for some doctors, but we urge you, in the name of humanity, to consider the consequences of your actions here and now, and for future generations to come. Thank you for reading this far.

Risk vs Benefit:- The definitive proof that the risks of modified RNA injections exceed any benefits remains the 2022 paper by Fraiman, Greenland, Cohen, Doshi et al. The ratio is strongly negative. There was documented fraud in the Pfizer approval trial anyway, and more people died in the treatment group than the control group, particularly from heart attacks. If there was a deadly virus and the ‘vaccine’ worked, we would expect to see the opposite.

Negative efficacy:- Deceptive mis-categorisation of vaccine status continues to propagate the widespread untruth that the jabs reduce serious illness, hospitalisations and death. On the contrary, it is the multiple jabs that are bearing the burden of COVID-19 infection, as discussed by computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose.

The Cleveland Clinic study confirms the negative efficacy loud and clear. The “surprising finding” to the researchers was that the more jabs one had, the higher the chances of catching COVID-19 This will be the personal experience or observations of some of you, no doubt. The trial and commentary by an independent data analyst. We have sent you similar findings since the studies started emerging.

Contamination and failure of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)

We have written extensively on the Latypova and Watt disclosures that show the US rollout is owned and operated by the US military, as a prototype countermeasure against a manufactured viral bioweapon. It is unclear what legal pathways exist in New Zealand, however, to suspend GMP, human testing and give civilian agencies both liability protection and irrelevance, as is the situation in the US.

Evidence for high variability in batch toxicity and thus contamination is now absolute, as discussed here by cardiologist and COVID-19 early treatment expert, Dr Peter McCullough.

Bacterial plasmid DNA was expected in tiny amounts from the scaled-up production process, but McKernan et al found very high levels, detailed in the urgent hearing already discussed above. This may be the source of the reverse transcription into the human genome that we have informed you about. Plasmids are, by their nature, certain to integrate into host DNA, including into the microbiome, turning gut bacteria into a potential spike protein factory forever, along with human cells. The same research proved the presence of SV40 virus oncogenic (cancer-causing) genetic code in the synthetic RNA shots. We have posted on all this since May.  This can be for no other purpose than to ensure integration into human DNA. This work has since been validated elsewhere.

By any account, not just that of oncologists, this should justify an investigation. Of course, the latest cancer statistics are unavailable but reports from health workers, patients and death notices give credence to an international cancer tragedy unfolding.

Heart damage: Serious cardiac adverse effects remain a major concern. A new Japanese study published in the top-tier journal Radiology shows that ALL vaccinated people have measurable cardiac stress following injection though they have no warning symptoms. The Swiss study we have discussed before is now published and peer-reviewed. This is also highly alarming and suggests too that almost everyone injected got a degree of heart damage. Actual symptomatic cardiac inflammation was seen in 1 in 35 (2.8%) of these 777 health workers in this study of the 3rd dose. (Swiss Study)

We have reported on similar studies before, eg the Thai teens study showing a 3.5% incidence of myo- or pericarditis in the boys. Yet here this has not justified stopping the rollout. These levels of harm from the jabs, in groups unaffected by severe covid anyway, are beyond any justification, as is your silence. It is simply a lie that covid would be worse than the jabs in these patients, nor is the jab myocarditis mild and self-limiting. Heart muscle cells cannot be replaced once they have died. For instance, 58% of post-jab myocarditis was still present at a year on MRI follow-up, as reported by a Hong Kong Study

We note that the NZ myocarditis study was supposed to be published early this year but now requests for updates on when it will be published are ignored. We continue to wait patiently for its findings. (There is a CDC study similarly being delayed). Far from being “vanishingly rare” the NZ researchers could select from over a thousand cases of post-vaccine cardiac inflammation supplied by MoH.

A recent Italian report documents late relapses in young subjects, with scar formation, which can lead to sudden fatal cardiac arrest, particularly in teens participating in sport, or during sleep. The medical reasons for this are no mystery. Meanwhile, multiple studies do NOT show the virus itself to cause significant myocarditis, as claimed by vaccine promoters. One is discussed by a cardiologist here.

Immune damage:-Repeated injections of the novel spike RNA are damaging immune responses, not just against the ability to clear COVID-19 and provide lasting actual immunity. Research shows multiple jabs cause IgG4 class switching and immune paralysis. This causes a tolerance situation, not just to repeated chronic infections but to cancer cells in the body that the immune system would otherwise destroy..

Computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose discusses IgG4-mediated immune tolerance, failure and fibrosis. Vaccinated children’s immune defense’s against all pathogens have been shown to be defective in a recent paper

Someone has to protect patients (and not from “disinfo doctors”)

Surely you can see the ongoing waves of PCR positivity and the new ‘variants’ escaping vaccine-induced antibodies, despite – our evidence has demonstrated because of –  your claimed 92% vaccination rate? Our Department of Justice advised the government that the jabs had to prevent transmission to justify mandating, but was ignored.

We disagree that the mandates were ever justified at all. They are an offence to human decency and intelligence as well as medical ethics and NZ Bill Of Rights Act. Mandating experimental gene transfer technology for a flu-level illness was never justified, as we have told you repeatedly. The government’s own medical experts advised only one NON-MANDATED jab for children but were rebuffed by Dr Bloomfield, and that the jab would not protect people from infecting each other, as in this, one of many illuminating documents released under OIA requests.

Your lack of oversight (at best) has harmed the nation, causing death. There were 64,800 adverse event reports before CARM stopped formal reporting, over 11,000 of them serious (but 7000 of these ‘went missing’ in the MoH and weren’t recorded on the Medsafe website, per an OIA response).  Hundreds of deaths were reported. The hospitals are overwhelmed, and full of excess vascular, cardiac and neurological cases, according to multiple accounts from staff and patients.

The Medical Council of New Zealand’s (MCNZ) action as political commissars enforcing obedience to anti-ethical dictates has silenced the medical profession’s traditional role as conscientious guardians, allowing an amoral landscape for commercial and political interests to run riot. MCNZ seems to be acting for the Federation of State Medical Boards, a private US pharma-funded corporation, not the NZ public. We have documented this extensively and continue to cry foul. We are in litigation to get this stopped.

The government has changed the Coroners Act which will aid and abet any cover-up and the ongoing silence on the many sudden and unexplained deaths, and tragedies all. No longer must a cause of death be discovered. A thousand-year-old common law principle has been shattered. Are we happy with this, as a society? Not only is death from “unascertained natural causes” deeply unsatisfactory, but it is also a lie in many of these cases. McCullough et al have just shown that properly performed autopsied reveal the jab as the universal cause in most sudden deaths following vaccination. We have written with serious concerns to coroners and pathologists about various suspicious cases, with near universal lack of response.

Rising death rates in vaccinated countries: Edward Dowd is a successful Wall Street data analyst. His recent book Cause Unknown quantifies the rise in death and disability that insurance companies are reporting amongst jabbed people with extensive references, and heart-rending photographs of many young lives lost already.

Rising all cause mortality is reflected in the hard data from government and insurance actuaries around the world e.g. the Euromomo report on elevated child deaths, as well as people in our small connected country dying suddenly.

Ongoing sudden deaths and disabilities continue amongst Kiwis, and many are young. At some point, these deaths will be properly examined and atoned for. The carpet is simply not large enough to conceal the growing pile of bodies being swept under it.  In the meantime circumstantial proof that corrupted and coerced institutions, and the people in them, are complicit in mass harm continues to accrue:

• cessation of regular safety reports by Medsafe;
• inadequate post-death investigations;
• irregularities, conflicts and inconsistencies from bodies like CARM and ISMB;
• refusal or long delays in response from public guardians like the Police, Ombudsman, Health and Disability Commissioner and Human Rights Commissioner;
• dismayed funeral directors speaking out;
• refusal to provide ACC cover for obvious injuries;
• an obedient press that refuses to ask questions or cover the obvious harms and risks from the jabs;
• some brave medical specialists starting to admit that they were mistaken in putting all faith in the wait for a jab, any jab;
• and whistle-blowers from NZ’s health bureaucracy, St. Johns, midwifery, and community health.

All tell the same story of overwhelming sickness and unprecedented rates of all the same illnesses reported to Pfizer as soon as widespread administration of the jabs began – clots, embolisms, strokes, heart attacks and chest pain, neurological syndromes, autoimmune diseases, cancers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The company tried to suppress them, but failed.

Ivermectin just won’t die: Meanwhile, the evidence for early treatments, particularly ivermectin, continues to strengthen. It is summarised here, and here at www.c19early.com, a comparator site of all the evidence for early and late treatments, pharmaceutical and natural. Peru is the latest real-world laboratory proving early treatments are successful, and many lives could have been saved here at home had Pfizer’s contract with the government not forced actual treatments underground. Some doctors were punished for following the highest level 1 evidence supporting ivermectin, a fully approved medicine, while at the same time, an experimental provisionally-approved injection was forced on people, including children and the pregnant. This is on top of the already severe consequences for those who tried to follow the Medicines Act, medical oaths and their consciences in questioning the jab.

Other mandates without informed consent:- Recent changes to the Medicines Act, and pronouncements by the vaccine industry and its partners at the WHO, have set the scene for endless genetically engineered injections to treat anything and everything. Medical regulators are now redefining themselves as facilitators for innovation rather than safety agencies. Is this the direction the public wishes to go, as the Therapeutic Products Act removes not just natural health products, but a wide range of practitioners and modalities that rely on them to help patients?

If any more confirmation were needed that actual health is of little interest to this government, we note the recent confirmation from the US government’s National Toxicology Program that water fluoridation does indeed harm developing brains, as if more research were needed. https://fluoridefree.org.nz  The Ministry of Health has just revealed it has not assessed this significant development as it forces fluoridation on local communities by edict. MoH is facing an injunction from various local communities as we write. The overall meta-analysis results showed a 5 point average reduction in child IQ scores (similar to the harm from lead which got it removed finally from petrol). There is damage to all aspects of brain function, not just intelligence, which will undermine our social and intellectual capital. We urge the complete cessation of adding a known industrial toxicant to the water.

Is there a pattern here?: Most of the world no longer fluoridates but NZ ploughs on, in the same way is it continues to promote covid jabs for all, despite all evidence to the contrary, and as other developed countries scale back their recommendations. If these are not all crimes against humanity we would like an explanation why, and how the identified perpetrators will escape justice.

Some of them are trying to hide behind the WHO, which is making it’s orders compulsory rather than voluntary and removing any deference to human rights and freedoms, and can enforce its edicts on us even before any actual emergency, as part of merely ‘planning or preparing’ for one. We do not doubt future attempts to assault human freedoms on other very dishonest grounds, and note the government’s work potentially to undermine private property rights – the very definition of successful Marxism – under the guise of ‘modelling’ that predicts climate catastrophe for New Zealand’s coastal and low lying areas. We could have our real estate stolen with no recourse to the courts, and be ‘resettled’, no doubt forcibly, to a 15-minute city of the regime’s choosing.

Final appeal to protect the public: Thankfully, the truth will flourish at some point and the people will have their say. Perhaps they are already, with dramatically declining appetite for endless shots with zero clinical or even rational basis for them. However, you must stop these dangerous injections in view of this further evidence undermining ‘safe and effective’, especially of contamination and carcinogenicity risk. Despite being the eve of a general election, do not leave it to the next parliament to consider. We say that is already too late for many thousands of Kiwis.

Yours sincerely,

The 280+ doctors, dentists and other professionals at NZDSOS, the 50,600 Kiwis who have signed our declaration, and on behalf of everyone in our shared home.

Our posts at NZDSOS.com contain many more references to the above. Any links to commentary articles always link to the original reference.

NOTE VALUABLE LINKS TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION: https://nzdsos.com/2023/10/13/open-letter-to-officials-covid-19-injections/?fbclid=IwAR0AiTuFZjGcXYJ-ZVfpg70sYYilMPoR7JKMqF8cEpamcS2fb1Wd-A4VU98

 

...

NZD SOS NZ DOCTORS CONTINUE TO  SPEAK OUT WITH SCIENCE ( 26^th March 2024) and the :- Collapsing Ivermectin Narrative: Frontline Doctors vs. US FDA. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a settlement with three frontline doctors whose foremost interest is successful patient outcomes. The three doctors who brought a case against the FDA for interfering in the doctor-patient relationship, and for overstepping its authority are celebrating a victory. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”.. The doctors at NZDSOS have also been pointing out ‘the government in the consultation room’ and advocating for doctors to be able to be doctors and have informed discussions with their patients, so they can make their own personal decisions.

In 2021, the FDA discouraged use of ivermectin to the extent of engaging in a propaganda campaign, most famously this tweet on 21 August 2021, linked to this consumer update expressing concern about “a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. As well as their social media campaign, the FDA sent a letter to the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Pharmacy in December 2021 to claim that use of ivermectin in prevention or treatment of Covid “may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19.“.

This apparent attempt to regulate its use directly contradicts the legal right of physicians to use any FDA-approved (Medsafe-approved in NZ) drug for “off-label prescribing”, meaning to treat conditions which the drug was not officially approved for. Because many drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, off-label prescribing is used in around one third of all treatment prescriptions. It seems the reason for the suppression of the use of ivermectin was to pave the way for the vaccines.  An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the injections was not possible in the US if an effective treatment was available.

In New Zealand, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, issued a similar warning to its members on 3 Sept 2021.“Off-label use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 is strongly not recommended.” Medsafe issued an Alert on 6 Sept 2021 which included the comment: “Ivermectin is NOT APPROVED to prevent or treat COVID-19, which means that Medsafe has not assessed the safety and efficacy for this use. Inappropriate use of ivermectin can be dangerous.”

The Pharmacy Council NZ issued a notice in Oct 2021 with advice to pharmacists referencing the Medsafe statement and the RNZCGP.  This encouraged pharmacists to report (dob in) doctors who were prescribing this safe medication. “Current evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.  Ivermectin, particularly when used at high doses, has the potential to cause adverse effects including: severe nausea, vomiting, and neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

“If a pharmacist has concerns regarding the competence or conduct of a prescriber, they may make a notification to the registrar of the relevant responsible authority.” Represented by legal counsel with a history of litigating against federal and regulatory agencies for wrongdoing, the three frontline physicians – Dr Robert Apter, Dr Mary Talley Bowden and Dr Paul Marik filed a lawsuit against the FDA. The legal argument revolved around the FDA practicing medicine by recommending against ivermectin for COVID-19 when they had not collected evidence to determine whether ivermectin was safe and effective for this purpose.

The doctors also alleged that the FDA was exceeding its authority by attempting to set medical standards which impacted the rights of clinicians to prescribe off-label. The role of the FDA is to assess safety and efficacy of medicines and approve them if appropriate.  It is not the FDA’s role to regulate their use once approved. (summary by Dr Pierre Kory),. When the lawsuit was initially filed, the FDA successfully moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that it cannot be sued because it has “sovereign immunity.”  Legal counsel for the doctors immediately appealed using the argument of ultra vires, which describes an official acting outside their authority. The Appeals Court judge ruled that the case could proceed and the FDA finally settled out of court with the plaintiffs (doctors).  The FDA now must remove all posted or published advice recommending against the use of ivermectin for Covid-19.

Dr Kory is of the opinion that the FDA closed on settlement rather than pursuing the legal case, because the entire PR campaign against ivermectin was devised and executed by a PR firm working for Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC, and that legal discovery would have caused reputational damage to individuals involved.

Dr Marik said at the FLCCC press briefing after settlement, that “We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’An interesting perspective on the story is that weaponized narratives such as the propaganda against ivermectin, leading to public harm whilst benefiting those in positions of power, establish “narrative scaffolds”. Once false information has solidified a narrative scaffold into place, the truth may be revealed but public opinion is already formed around the scaffold and may never be revised.

Meanwhile NZDSOS and, we trust, our supporters, will continue to work at showing New Zealanders that the ivermectin story is a part of the bigger picture of public-private partnerships between captured regulators such as Medsafe, and the pharmaceutical industry who fund a staggering proportion of the budget of regulators. Dr Scott Jensen from Minnesota, USA responded to the FDA settlement ruling in this video.  Thanks to Coronavirus Plushie for the below excellent montage illustrating the establishment of a weaponized narrative scaffold. We look forward to the day that fraudulent narrators, including Dr Ian Town, Dr Ashley Bloomfield and Sarah Fitt, are held accountable for the harm their actions have caused to New Zealanders

LINK (https://nzdsos.com/2024/03/26/the-collapsing-ivermectin-narrative-frontline-doctors-vs-us-fda/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly-posts)

 

...

Nicola Willis was asked for a response to Barry Youngs Court Case and she responses ” she would not comment on a case before the court”. . But she said that, in general, the unauthorized access, use or leaking of government information was disappointing. She said “such actions had the potential to damage public trust and confidence in the neutrality of the public service “Well Nicola Willis how about the already thousands of data files leaked from govt agencies.. Health records, Bereavement records, Clinical Records, Post Mortem records, Cancer Patient Records. Inadequate Govt agencies data system security putting all NZrs at risk of having their private information put in the hands of criminals, during the COVID Pandemic and before. This is evidential through public information via Minister Of Health, DHB reports and Beehive Speeches. Data Systems inadequate, outdated posing serious cyber attacks. Thousands upon thousands of files. All exposed to criminals, the dark web. The evidence is truly evidential. The Government Agencies especially Ministry Of Justice, Ministry Of Health- Te Whatu Ora- Health NZ. Brooke Van Velden gave a very interesting speech in Parliament about Cancer patients having to travel outside their areas to be able to access radiation, cancer treatment because of cyber attacks. Doctors had to revert to writing on white boards.The government knew there was a problem. The Privacy Commission reported :-THE PRIVACY COMMISSION ANNOUNCED “ Organizations, Government Agencies “Personal data pertaining to New Zealanders, those agencies, orgs, are responsible in protecting information, keep it safe from cyber attacks, cyber threats under the Privacy Act. A failure to do so is a breach of the Privacy Act. They must put things right to protect New Zealanders personal information, keep it safe from cyber attacks. There is no room for any organizations, govt agencies to be complacent in protecting New Zealand private information held in their data systems.

TRUST IS HARD WON… EASILY LOST’….Many New Zealanders have lost all trust with the government. I do not see Apa of Te Whatu Ora admitting the 1,000’s of Health Files etc., that have already been leaked by way of Mercury IT. That was not something she chose not to speak about, its damming evidence on Government Agencies part. Ministers, including Andrew Little admitted to all olf this. Mercury IT admitted to this cyber attacking .I understand you cannot be involved in an ongoing court case, and that the government is currently seeking expert advice to put this serious Cyber Security risks of New Zealander to right, however admittance of the governments own guilt should be publicly exposed as it is Barry Young being criminalized and it appears the government is beyond being criminalized or held accountable to the Privacy Commission. Parliamentary Immunity is unjustifiable and is criminal in itself putting so many NZrs lives at risk by not updating cyber security systems. In my Research I have been following speeches within the Beehive for years, therefore I am well aware of these Cyber attacks and the inadequate cyber security system that exists and the concerns as to updating that system, the failing of the follow-up to this by ministers.

My past working history is several decades working in paid employment in Crisis Intervention. Restorative Justice, Have written papers for Judge Brown. Have been a member of the NZ Youth Court Committee. A Family Therapist. Studied Social Policy. Played a key part in setting up a first ever pilot in NZ as to supporting victims of Youth Crime. Undertook some training at the Police College as to Victims affected by Homicides and Suicides. Working on call to Police 24 x 7. Having access to incident files. Attending many workshops, voluntary End of Story time writing assisting those in Hospice write their end of life story’s for their loved ones. Worked voluntarily for Age Care. I have attended 6 Treaty workshops.

Personally, I am a mother of four, grandmother of 25, great grandmother of 7, they are a mixture of cultures, ethnic groups and love them all.

Honesty is my Policy. I would appreciate your honesty in anticipation of a response to my email that holds great concern that New Zealanders are highly at risk of cyber attacks and Barry Young is being unjustly, unfairly targeted. The government (Te Whatu Ora-Health NZ) needs to take a look at itself in the mirror before pointing the finger at an innocent man.

RESEARCHER: Carol Sakey

...

TOO LATE TE WHATU ORA IT’S GONE GLOBAL….

Barry Young once again before the court yesterday 23^rd February  2024. Pleading Not Guilty as he is accused by Apa of Te Whatu Ora of a data leak of personal info referencing that of 12,000 or more online. Barry is charged with dishonestly speaking out about Te Whatu Ora  Health Agency  Data online. Judge Warburton remanded Barry Young on Bail. As Barry Young said as he was leaving court “Truth Is Not A Crime’. The article in mainstream propaganda again call Barry and Liz conspiracy theorist as the Weaponizing of Health unfolds worldwide, more information is being exposed by expert professional and medical professionals worldwide.  But Barry’s case is very significant as we have a smaller population, which is evidentiality of much use to those that are professionally medically exposing the truth worldwide. Therefore NZ is on the map in this instance. All eyes on NZ.

Te Whatu Ora reported this is a complex investigation, there is a collaboration between national and international experts. They are starting to contact every person effected by Barry’s Leak of information. They are working with online security experts nationally, internationally to monitor for signs of the exposure of data online HOW CONVENIENT

HOW CONVENIENT- COVER YOUR OWN ARSES.. RNZ Report 6/12/2022 cyber attack hits 1,000’s of coronial files and health records, investigation into digital security. Ministry of Justice and Whatu Ora hold IT Provider Mercury IT responsible. 14,500 Coroners files, 4,000 Post Mortem Files of who died between November 2018 and November 2022  HOW CONVENIENT  NZrs personal information right across NZ breached.   20^th November 2011 8,500 bereavements, care services file and 5,000 Cardias and Inherited Disease records cycler attacked. Privacy Commissioner notified 20/11/2022  HOW CONVENIENT

Ministry of Justice and Te Whatu Ora said “no evidence of any unauthorized access or downloading of files however Ministry Chief Operating Officer Carl Crafter said “this could not be ruled out, this is a possibility” He said We need to acknowledge this information is sensitive, six Regulatory Health Authorities have been hit. Te Whatu Ora responding “ We realize this is distressing”, and “we are working with cyber security experts to determine the full nature and extent of the impact of this incident”

Reference was made to a 2021 Waikato DHB report on Cyber attacks which said “ Te Whatu Ora needs to think like a hacker when building its security software”. In May 2021 ransomware cyber attacks brought DHBs, hospitals, services to a complete halt, as systems were worked on to be restored. Doctors had to work on whiteboards, and use hard copies for gathering information. 6^th December 2022 1,000’s of coroners files, post mortem reports caught up in Ministry of Justice hack. Referencing 14,500 coroners files, 4000 post mortum reports nationwide of a sensitive personal information. Action was to be taken by National Cyber Security Centre, Privacy Commission, Police & CERT-NZ to investigate the extent of the incident which exposing that of Mercury IT that is commissioned to these DHBs etc., being at the heart of the cyber attack.

NZ Public were told to watch out for suspicious texts, emails unusual things happens, accounts, bank accounts etc.,

Stuff NZ reported 6/12/ 2022 Cyber Attack on external company Mercury IT. Bereavement files Cardio Arrest reports Middlemore Hospital access to  8500  bereavement files dating back to 2015. 5,500 records  data dating back to 2011, disease data dating back to 2011 Auckland Wellington Tauranga and Nelson clinicians files. Mercury IT confirmed the cyber attacks in a statement dated 30/11/2022 that files had been effected nationwide. Mercury IT providing a wide range of IT Services to customers across NZ, governments, orgs, etc.,

16/12/2022 Te Whatu Ora hacked files before High Court. Te Whatu Ora and Health NZ cyber attacked files 14,500 coroners files, 4,000 other reports. Ransome ware cyber attack. References have been made a number of times that urgent work was required as to cyber security that cyber attacks were happening daily, saying this is an evolving situation. RNZ reported that DHBs were cyber attacked this is catastrophic for patient safety. Cyber attacks on high alert. Spokes person from Telehealth Leadership Group advising the Ministry that ‘phishing scams are efficient and ruthless. DHB Southern Region noticing cyber attacks over a period of 7 days.

NZ Herald May 18^th 2021 NZ Hospitals battle daily cyber attacks. All DHBs across NZ face Cyber attacks in various forms (source Ministry Of Health) Cyber Attacks target COVID19 Pandemic HOW CONVENIENT WHEN INVESTIGATIONS, INQUIRIES, MASKING INFORMATION, MASKING THE TRUTH.   NZ Parliament 29/6/2021 Speakers in the House discuss DHB  Cyber Attacks referring to Ransome ware, the debate was declined because they wanted to discuss budget. Brooke Van Veldon speaker said “there is significant evidence that NZrs personal infor – data is on the dark web, this is a huge concern, ongoing incidences. People who are undergoing radiation therapy for cancer have had to travel beyonf their residential area to other areas in NZ to receive cancer treatment. Referenced also 400,000 NZrs could be affected, these are vulnerable people whom are already suffering  from ongoing serious harm.

Investigations have shown that DHBs lack vital IT Infrastructure, network security is outdated inadequate and this has increased cyber security attacks, there are serious security issues, therefore patient private data is never safe, and has not been without risk. HOW CONVENIENT. 30^th May 2023 Ministry of Health referenced a report that DHB Computer systems seriously need an upgrade, government failed to follow through.   Andrew Little confirmed what Brooke Van Veldon had said as to her serious concerns as to cyber attacks, saying “patients information is accessible to others worldwide We have known that for some time”. Melissa Lee saying that Cyber Attackers go for weaknesses.

Parliament 2019 discussed cyber attacks in NZ the need for upgrading inadequate data IT Security Systems. Stuff NZ reported 27/5/2021 Privacy Commission warned DHBs to address security failings. December 18^th 2023 Lisa Fong speech as 2023 NZITF Conference spoke about the NZ Internet Task Force referencing the November 2023 Cyber Threat  Report- Domestic and International. Linking more domestic incidents to financially motivated crims and the growing effective malicious cyber tools, vulnerabilities the public are facing, infrastructure is made easier for cyber attackers to work at scale, sophistication causing national harm. And the need to improve NZ Cyber Security System Framework, saying she was getting expert advice from across NZ. IN OTHER WORDS THE GOVERNMENT HAD NOT GOT THEIR SHITE TOGETHER LEFT THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS OF NZRS EXPOSED TO THE DARK WEB , CRIMS THAT UTILIZE CYBER ATTACKS USING THEIR PRIVATE INFORMATION.

Stuff NZ 23/2/2024 Accused former Public Servant calls on other would-be whistleblowers. Barry accused of stealing large amounts of health data. Wellington District Court Barry was charged with ‘dishonestly accessing databases belonging to his former employer Health NZ-Te Whatu Ora. Barry said “I urge anyone in the Police, anyone in the services who have access to information that needs to come out, please, please do the right thing and end this”. Te Whatu Ora is accusing Barry of leaking 12,000 of peoples personal information as a result of a data breach. HOW COVENIENT. HOW MANY DATA BREACHES IS TO WHATU ORA, GOVERNMENT AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR.  AND YOU SEVERELY ATTACK THIS COURAGEOUS MAN.  HOW CONVENIENT.

THE PRIVACY COMMISSION ANNOUNCED “ Organizations, Government Agencies “Personal data pertaining to New Zealanders, those agencies, orgs, are responsible  in protecting information, keep it safe from cyber attacks, cyber threats under the Privacy Act.  A failure to do so is a breach of the Privacy Act. They must put things right to protect NZrs personal information, keep it safe from cyber attacks. There is no room for any organizations, govt agencies to be complacent in protecting New Zealand private information held in their data systems. TRUST IS HARD WON… EASILY LOST’

HOW CONVENIENT, PROTECTING THE BACKS OF THOSE THAT DID LEAK THOUSANDS OF DATA FILES, NZRS PRIVATE INFO, HEALTH RECORDS, BEREAVEMENT RECORDS, POST MORTUM, CLINICAL CARDIO… JUST TARGET BARRY YOUNG FOR ALL THOSE INJUSTICES, SERIOUS HARMS THE GOVERNMENT HAS DONE TO VUNERABLE NEW ZEALANDERS.

https://www.ncsc.govt.nz/news/looking-to-the-future/

 

 

...