SciTechDaily article publish  3^rd Feb 2023 authored by University of California Jan 2^nd 2022 ‘Grow And Eat Your Own Vaccines’. Using Plants as mRNA Factories. Eating salads could replace the jab in the arm where vegetable, salads could be turned into mRNA factories. Messenger RNA or mRNA technology that’s used in COVID19 jabs. The project was funded by the National Science Foundation USA… Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The DNA containing the mRNA jabs can successfully be delivered into part of the plant cell where it is then replicated. The DNA encoding for the protein is delivered by targeted nano materials, without mechanical aid by applying a droplet of nano formulation to the leaf surface.  The UCRs Dept of Botany & Plant Sciences San Diego  are in collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University. Vegs and salads become not just foods but  edible vaccines without the jab. Nano –materials deliver nitrogen, a fertilizer directly to where the plants most need it. The plant engineering technique will make nanoparticles go to the chloroplast, which  lies within the cells of plants and certain algae- the site of Nano materials deliver nitrogen, a fertilizer directly to which a process where the sun converts the plant into chemical energy for growth.

Sept 22^nd 2022 the ISAAA Global Knowledge Centre of Biotechnology published an article  ‘US Scientists Embark on developing an edible plant based vaccine. Edible plants  mRNA Vaccine factories. Stating that lettuce and spinach can produce vaccines, grown in backyards and entire fields. Where mRNA technology can currently be used to produce COVID19 vaccines in plants. The objective being the DNA containing the mRNA vaccines can be delivered into part of the plant cells where they can replicate. Thus demonstrating the plant ability to produce enough mRNA to compete with traditional  vax shots.

Science Daily reported 7^th January 2014 University of Washington published an article which referenced a new type of vaccines. One that would be easier to manufacture and much cheaper. A vaccine that could be manufactured on demand for human immunizations and administered within minutes after a disease broke out. Mass jabs for an entire population, for everyone immediately as soon as an epidemic starts. Blanket vaxing the entire population as published by Francious Banys, professor of chemical engineering and lead author of the ‘Journal of Nano-Medicine’. The research was funded by a grant from the ‘Grand Challenges Explorations’ which is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnering the National Institute of Health.

December 18^th 2019 the Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT News article entitled ‘Storing Medical Information below the Skins Surface’, where a specialized invisible dye is delivered along with a vaccine, that enables the patients  personal ID and vaccination history to be stored nakedly under the skin. The invisible quantum of dye is delivered by a micro needle patch.  The quantum invisible dye consists of nano-crystals, can remain for at least 5 years under the skin where it emits infrared light that can be detected by a specifically equipped smart phone. These applications mean that populations can be traced, tracked through this invisible quantum dot.

30^th April 2022-Gates Foundation website ‘Gates Notes’ published an article ‘Everyone, everywhere- vaccinate the world in 6 months’ to prevent pandemics. He stated that the COVID19 jabs are safe and effective, however there are serious problems  he said that we need to solve before the next pandemic comes along and that is “those who have not been jabbed. The world needs to produce enough vaccines for everyone on the planet within 6 months of discovering a new pathogen. 8 Billion doses for a single dose vaccine, 16 billion for a 2 dose vaccine version. Steps need to be taken to accelerate the invention of new vaccines, there will be a process of a lot of trial and error. Connecting diagnostic tests to the human trial system we can automatically suggest to doctors that their patients should join a trial. mRNA vaccines could help speed up manufacturing doing away with conventional ways which are quite complex. Transferring the technology know how from one company to another. Just swap the old mRNA for a new one, its easier to transfer between companies. He added “with these advances it will be possible to achieve something amazing beyond preventing pandemics, eradicating entire families of pathogens” A world that could rid itself of all coronaviruses, even the influenza virus. NOTE The common cold is a coronavirus. No-one has ever magically got rid of the common cold. “A future without pandemics and without the flu, Gates said “now that’s worth investing in”

Gates referred to new modular technologies in the pipeline, that are easier, cheaper to build, factories that can be adapted to make different vaccines and tackle vaccine hesitancy. He made a You Tube Video on ‘how to deal with rumours, myths in India. (You Tube Video ‘Dispelling Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural India). Gates has published many articles ‘The future our grandchildren disserve’. Bill Gate’s ‘The Year Ahead 2023 CNBC published report 23^rd January 2019 refers to Bill Gates and DAVOS (World Economic Forum). Where Bill Gates made some key points about his best investments where he turned $10 billion into $200 billion  by investing in global health organizations aimed at increasing access to vaccines that created a 20 to 1 return.

Gates Foundation established GAVI in 1999 pledging $750 to set GAVI up. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged US $750 million to set up  GAVI is a key partner in shaping the global vaccine market. Gates biggest investment, money maker. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation play a technical and financial role in the Global Vaccine Alliance to shape global markets, gathering data, decision making, providing financial support for market investments. Gates foundation also make substantial funding available to the World Health Org., (UN), therefore he does have influential global privileges. The foundations invests in activities ranging from vaccine discovery- development-delivery financially supporting  new entrants into the market.

A the author, researcher of this article, I am personally highly suspicious of the COVID Pandemic through research finding that the World Health Org., Immunization Agenda 2030 Report which is a Global Strategy to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The decade of action- 2020- 2030. The World Health Assembly with the support of UN Nation State Government and partners endorsed a global vision and strategy titled ‘Agenda 2030 -IA 2030 that envisions a world where everyone, everywhere at every age fully benefits from vaccines. It aims to maintain ‘hard won’ gains in immunization, recovering from the disruptions caused by COVID19, to achieve even more by leaving no-one behind-in any situation at any stage of life. It aims to maintain hard-won gains in immunization, recover from the disruptions caused by COVID-19, and achieve even more – by leaving no one behind, in any situation or at any stage of life.  A co-creation process with close engagement of countries to ensure that the vision, strategies, priorities and goals are aligned with each country’s needs. IA 2030 framework is designed to be tailored by countries to their local context, to be revised throughout the decade as new needs, challenges emerge. This also includes a framework of tailored indicators that enable use of data action to increase immunization programs at all levels. To monitor progress across all countries at country, regional, global levels. IA 2030 goals are designed to inspire action for implementation for health security, universal health coverage. Countries could set their own specific targets and milestones for the decade of action 2020-2030. This includes regional vaccination action plans. For partner organization, this could mean aligning organizational strategies and indicators to accelerate the attainment of IA 2030 goals. Putting people in the centre, led by governments and implemented through broad partnerships and driven by data. IA 2030 with strategic priorities referring to UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, Targets for the entire world. Extremely ambitious commitments to gain population vaccination over the 2020-2030 decade. A Decade of Action- as described by the UN WHO.

WHO published “Immunization is playing a critical role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Immunization to reach more people than any other health and social service, a key driver to universal health coverage. Immunization is critical to SDG3, promotes wellbeing for all ages. IA 2030 contributes either directly or indirectly to thirteen of the other SDGs of UN Agenda 2030 (Published by the WHO (UN) 1/4/2020). UN Agenda 2030 was introduced in October 2015 after the failing of UN Agenda 2021. UN Agenda 2030 is non-binding, however Jacinda Ardern was a guest speaker at a gathering hosted by Bill and Melinda Gates for WEF Global Shapers Community. Ardern boasted to the audience at the gathering that she had introduced UN Agenda 2030 into NZs domestic policies, making her the first in the world to lead the way, encouraging other countries to do the same. Once introduced into Domestic policy UN Agenda 2030 became binding and legal. GAVI Alliance created by Gates Foundation published an article on their website referring to ‘vaccine collaboration’. Titled ‘ Decade of Vaccine Collaboration’. A ten year vision of immunization for all people regardless of where they live, that was in 2010. Stating that in the next 10 years the global health community vision of a world in which all individuals and communities can be free of vaccine preventable diseases’. The Decade of Vaccines Collaboration- brought together diverse stakeholders to develop the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), GAVI (Bill Gates serves on the leadership council of the global vaccination collaboration steering committee. The Global Vaccine Action Plan IA2030. The Global Vaccine Plan (GVAP) has been endorsed by 194 UN Member State Governments at the World Health Assembly in 2012 where a framework was presented to achieve the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ vision for peoples in ALL communities worldwide. To reach vaccination targets in every region, country, community, to meet global and regional elimination targets and to develop, introduce new vaccines and technologies. Coincidental I don’t think so, the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy was launched in 2005. It was Bill Gates that provided the leadership of the Global Vaccine Plan for 194 UN Member State Govts, for every region, every community globally. Supported by their WHO (UN0 and UNICEF (UN) and the World Bank, including of course the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In 2005 the International Health Regulations were created at the World Health Assembly which are binding for 194 UN Member State Governments, which include 196 countries. Helen Clark is the co chair of a gathering working on a plan to add more resolutions to IHR 2005, also a plan for an International Pandemic Treaty. The results of this planning to be reported to a gathering at the UN Assembly in January, last month. The World Health Assembly have set a deadline of May 2024 for putting together a draft pandemic treay and proposed amendments to IHR 2005. (IHR Binding on 194 UN Nation States). Negotiations are under way in Geneva to amend the IHR 2005 regulations, to create a new WHO convention on pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery this is referred to as the International Pandemic Treaty. A rules based international order. This would go beyond legal restrictions it would be global compliancy, demands, international global cooperation.  Under Art 19 and 21 of the Constitution of the World Health Org.,, the World Health Assembly may adopt legally binding conventions and regulations.

The World Health Assembly therefore is composed of representatives of UN Member States, often ministers of health who meet once a year to vote on resolutions and decisions. So the final decision on what is adopted rests with Member States themselves. (Helen Clark is co chair of the latest proposed amendments to IHR 2005 and the International Pandemic Treaty). Article 60 of the WHO Constitution states that different voting quota’s apply to the adoption of regulations approved by the World Health Assembly. This requires 2/3rds majority of the Member UN States present and voting in the Assembly.  Under Art 60 regulations can be adopted by a simple majority unless the representatives classify them as ‘important issues’ on an ad-hoc basis, then this required 2/3^rd majority. However, despite the differences in the provisions requiring the necessary majorities and procedures for entry into force, agreements and regulations are in practice, generally decided upon by consensus in the plenary sessions  of the World Health Assembly. Agreements can be adopted on any matter according to Art 19 of the WHO Convention. Art 2 WHO enumerates 22 functions of the organization, first is to act as the ‘governing and coordinating body of International Health’. WHO deals with the regimes of  International Law for example ‘access to medicines’ due to intellectual property rights and environmental health (A One Health Approach- for everyone, everywhere at every age). Agreements become binding once they have undergone the entire ratification process.  Under Art 21 of the WHO Constitution, the World Health Assembly can adopt legally binding regulations on States unless they expressly reject them (opt out), however once the period specified in the regulations for rejecting or formulating reservations has elapsed, the rules in question are binding all UN Member States that have not expressed any objections. In January 2022 the US Government submitted a proposal to amend 13 provisions of IHR 2005. Also an initiative where WHO (UN) could declare a public health emergency of international concern without first consulting the affected UN Member States, the creation of a new mid level emergency declaration

NOTE: The One Health Approach of the WHO (UN) Convention. The World Health Assembly includes environmental, food and animal health to be included. (Food, animals-wild, domestic- soil, plants, air etc., every living organism. If these new amendments are adopted, if an International Pandemic Treaty is established all UN Member State governments must increase their funding towards this, this will be considerably much higher than contributions to WHO by UN Nations States now, hence more money from tac payers pockets and massive control over our health, a One World Health Governance for ALL. Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.  Helen Clark Twitter “GAVI are making vaccine available to ALL, so that no-one gets left behind”

8^th March 2021 NZ Herald published an article – vaccines are expected to arrive in New Zealand during the second half of the year,” Jacinda Ardern said. “This brings our total Pfizer order to 10 million doses or enough for 5 million people to get the two shots needed to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.. “.8^th March 2021 Stuff NZ reported “The government’s new order brings New Zealand’s total for the Pfizer vaccine to 10m doses. Because the vaccine requires 2 shots to be effective. On the 10^th March 2021 The Beehive reported  “New agreements secure access to 7.6 million doses from AstraZeneca – enough for 3.8 million people, and 10.72 million doses. We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need”

NOTE: A Texas Court has ordered FDA to shares thousands of Pfizer documents that were received by FDA prior to the authorization of the Pfizer jab on the open market. Pfizer had refused the request stating no-one would view this information. However the thousands of pages of Pfizer info will not be available to the public or anyone else for at least another 2-3 years. Pfizer admitted in the European Parliamentary Court they did not test the Pfizer jab to see if it stopped transmission of the virus. Early 2022 the WHO (UN) requested that all UN Nation Governments align the way they reported COV ID deaths with the way WHO does. If a person has a COVID19 Positive Test and dies within 28 days of that test this is counted as a COVID19 Death, that window on 28 days can be extended. In UK it has been known at times to be extended to 60 days.  Therefore the man that got shot by police in Auckland where the mainstream news-media called this a COVID death this is the reason why. Therefore suicide number, post jab deaths etc., etc., can magically disappear within the data.

The intentional deliberate plundering of NZ through UN Immunization Alliance 2030 Collaboration The World Bank, UNICEF and WHO (UN) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  Reference to speech in the House “We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need “ Two new vaccines secured, enough for every New Zealander .

LINKS:

https://scitechdaily.com/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines-using-plants-as-mrna-factories/        https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2023C04/  
Covid-19: Pfizer vaccine purchase order made for 8.5 million …https://www.stuff.co.nz › .8^th March 2021
COVID-19 vaccine roll-out plan | Beehive.govt.nz https://www.beehive.govt.nz › … 10 March

We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need …
Two new vaccines secured, enough for every New Zealander https://www.beehive.govt.nz ›

Twitter  https://twitter.com/HelenClarkNZ/status/1265449131364937728

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-coronavirus-37m-for-vaccine-research-and-to-join-global-development/YOEEFRONOYHNFOU43NT4AJMUHA/?c_id=1&objectid=12334887

Decade of Vaccines (DoV) Collaboration

Global Vaccine Action Plan (

https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/global-health-development/decade-vaccine-collaboration

https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030

Gates ‘Dispelling Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural India is on You Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y1jG2bVUVM

https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Vaccinate-the-world-in-six-months 30th April 2022        https://scitechdaily.com/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines-using-plants-as-mrna-factories/

https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218      https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Vaccinate-the-world-in-six-months 30th April 2022

https://www.gavi.org/operating-model/gavis-partnership-model/bill-melinda-gates-foundation

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html     https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=19023

1st December 2022. Govt Investment to support Maori Business and Jobs in the Primary Sector- Damien O’Connor and Meka Whaitiri speakers in the House.  Total exports by Māori businesses have grown by 38% since 2017 to $872 million, with the majority from the food and fibre sector. Launch of Rautaki mo te Taurikura action plan to support the continued growth of Māori food and fibre sector.  Support for Māori agribusiness innovation and workforce development.-Co-investment in a trial embedding mātauranga Māori in farming practices to improve soil quality and clean up waterways. The Government is investing in more on-the-ground support, innovation, and workforce development as part of a new plan to grow Māori businesses and jobs in the food and fibre sector.

Associate Agriculture Minister Meka Whaitiri announced  “so we can lift sustainability, maintain our international competitive edge and grow export value, we’re kick-starting that mahi by co-investing in a $723,200 project led by Māori farming company Ātihau-Whanganui Incorporation, which operates 42,000 hectares of whānau farms in the Manawatū-Whanganui region. The project will involve an innovative trial embedding mātauranga Māori into farming practices, delivering measurable environmental benefits around improving soil quality and cleaning up waterways. Investing in projects like this will ensure our Māori agribusinesses can lift productivity across their land, by providing up to date advice to adjust their practices and innovate, so that growth in exports can continue and provide jobs across the sector,” Meka Whaitiri said.  The Ministry for Primary Industries’ Sustainable Food and Fibre Futures fund (SFF Futures) will contribute $433,920 to the project.

Total exports by Māori businesses have grown from $630 million in 2017 to $872 million in 2021, with the majority from the food and fibre sector. “we launched Rautaki mo te Taurikura – Embracing change for prosperity, which is a detailed plan to support the Māori food and fibre sector and drive even more growth in the years to come,” Meka Whaitiri said.  Adding that  “This builds on multiple investments from Budget 2022, including $34 million to put extra Māori agribusiness advisors in the regions, and $35 million to support Māori-led innovation and mātauranga-based approaches to reducing on-farm emissions, includes the use of workshops, targeted groups, field days and other on-farm activities to share the most up to date information on low emissions practices. We’ve also invested in projects to help landowners improve their productivity, create training opportunities and jobs, and develop innovative practices and products to grow Māori exports.”. “Māori are uniquely positioned to convert the challenges ahead into opportunities,  and to lead the way for others to do the same,” Meka Whaitiri said. “Purchasing decisions of consumers abroad are increasingly being driven by their values, as they question how products were produced and by who. New Zealand’s future opportunities lie in aligning with their values, and this sector plan helps take us there,” Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor said. “Supporting the Māori primary sector to expand and achieve its aspirations is a key part of the Government and sector’s Fit for a Better World roadmap, which aims to add $44 billion to primary sector export revenue across the next 10 years.”

The Rautaki mo te Taurikura plan will be reviewed in 2024. The plan can be downloaded here: Budget 2022 also included $40 million to deliver industry transformation plans for the food and beverage, fisheries, and the forestry and wood processing sectors, which we’re developing in partnership with industry and Māori.”  Other SFF Futures initiatives with Maori include a $19.9 million project with Spring Sheep to expand into the Taranaki region in partnership with Parininihi ki Waitotara (PKW) and an $11.6 million programme with Ngāi Tahu Farming Limited  And Ngāi Tūāhuriri to take part in a whole-farm scale study in North Canterbury to validate the science of regenerative farming. The Government’s commitment to helping farmers adapt to shifting consumer expectations is demonstrated by the co-investment of about $530 million with the sector across 230 SFF Futures projects to date.

https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/54376

The Eco Socialist Manifesto was jointly launched in Paris in 2001 by  Joel Kovel and Michael Lowy during a workshop on ecology and socialism. It was quoted “The deepest shadow that hangs over us is neither terror, environmental collapse not global recession, it is internalized fatalism. Kovel is known as the father of Eco Socialism he was a Green party ember is the US. He ran for US Senate in 1998. Kovel was an advisory editor of Socialist Resistance.  The Eco Socialist Manifesto refers to a reasoning as to preventing crisis and the necessity for overcoming it. The Eco Socialist Internationalists bought this into being. Namely a ‘chaotic world order to spread across the world like gangrene

The crisis of ecology of societal breakdown, the demands of eco socialism, the imperialistic one world governance. Greenwashing, at whatever costs it take, human costs, costs to lives and costs to economy, the plundering of nations. The hand in glove of corrupt subservient states, elite locals and  transnational corporations collaborating with heads of UN Members States, academia, NGO’s and others that are highly rewarded for doing so. Profound unsustainability, this must be changed to have a utopian future worth living. This is Socialism on steroids. This should have been set fire to on the rubbish heap of history. Through the reinterpretation of Socialism eg Eco Socialism thus Socialism on steroids has become mans worst nightmare, endangering humanity itself. Elaborating, collaborating and embracing Eco Socialism is what some call Eco Fascist Cultism. The death of a nation.

I became much more interested in Eco  Socialist Fascism, and the deaths within nations, and the non transparency around Eco-Socialist Fascism. The Eco Fascist National Socialism of the Nazi ecology component. Eco fascism. The ‘Roots of Blood and Soil’ Germany, the science of ecology, Green leftist politics, fanatical socialist nationalism. Hitlers Nazism the  home of naturalism and socialist nationalism better known as fanatical socialist nationalism, the cause of peasantry, which led to the welfare of the land. “When one sees nature in a necessary connectedness and interrelationship, then all things are equally important-shrub, worm, plant, human, stone, nothing first or last, but all one single unity.” Hitlers veganism – purity of the Aryan race environmental Eco Socialist Fascism. The deadly connection between love of the land, namely the planet – the worship of Gaia Goddess mother earth and militant racist nationalism. Eco-Socialist Fascism.

Researching Eco Socialism I came across an article in the Sydney Morning Herald dated 15th March 2019 5.58 pm. Entitled ECO-FASCISM and the Aussie Shooter by Michael Koziol. What I read really took me off guard. Marx advocated a communist economic system. Eco Socialism taking control of the means of production. As Tarrant self described himself an eco fascist. As Scott Morrison confirmed that the Australian had been arrested in New Zealand and that he had been briefed on the manifesto described as a ‘work of hate’. 74 pages of the Australian’s dossier regurgitated familiar objections to immigration and multiculturalism, laments the decaying culture of the white European West. He made little reference to Australia in his manifesto, in his view ‘Australia was no more than a ‘European colony’ “simply an offshoot its its British colonists and a ;ack lustre one at that. He dismissed the idea he could have been radicalised by ideas given to him by friends and associates, the stated that “those around him were the typical Australians, apathetic and for the most part apolitical. He did not identify as an Australian despite being born there. The news reported that the gunman said. “The origins of my language is European, my culture is European, my political beliefs are European, my philosophical beliefs are European, my identity is European and, most importantly, my blood is European,” he wrote. “What is an Australian but a drunk European? Kidding, but Australia is a European colony, particularly of British stock and thereby an extension of Europe.”  The dossier compiled by a self described terrorist, reveals an obsession with violent uprisings against Islam. Describes his country of his birth ‘ little more than an outpost of Europe with prosperity for political apathy’. He described himself as an ‘Ethno Nationalist Eco-fascist’ having previously identified as a communist, an anarchist and a libertarian. He wrote that he believed in ‘ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature and the natural order”. He was a self described ‘Ethno Nationalist Eco Fascist’’ Eco fascism the darker shade of green. That is environmentalism  and progressive leftist politics. Aggressive, violent white nationalist espousing eco fascist political beliefs indicating a troubling trend in environmental politics

On researching another report/ thesis of the emergence of Eco Fascism 152 pages pdf. The (Re)Emergence of Eco-Fascism: White-Nationalism, Sacrifice, and Proto-Fascism in the Circulation of Ecological Far-Right Digital Rhetoric. by Jacob Kenton Smith, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of Communication. David W. Schlueter, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. Approved by the Thesis Committee Leslie A. Hahner, Ph.D., Chairperson Scott Varda, Ph.D. Sara Alexander, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2021 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Describes ‘Environmentalism is no longer the sole domain of progressive and leftist politics. Espousing white nationalists namely eco-fascist with political believes that are a troubling trend in environmental politics. Goes on to name the Christchurch shooter, Patrick Crusius the El Paso Shooter. Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch shooter, and Patrick Crusius, the El Paso Shooter, explicitly utilized argumentative strategies taken from eco-fascist literature bases. Twitter thread sparked the largest discussion of eco-fascism ever. Fascists on the platform Telegram espouse the belief fascism is inherently natural.

 By studying the rhetorical techniques and appeals of eco-fascist digital rhetoric, this thesis adds to an emerging conversation regarding the (re)emergence of eco-fascism. Although they refer to Far Right let me explain that. When you go as far right as you possible can and to the far left as far as you possible can there both meet in the same sphere is in this Eco Fascism.

The NZ Muslims are the Shia Community, researching Turkey, the ethno national using a political tool and the reason for ‘sunnification’ The European Turks to follow this model depends on their level of acceptance of the society they live in. Eco Nationalist Fascism had entered Turkey. I have this questioning of the mind, did the Australian shooter have this yearning for his visits , and extended lengthy visit to Turkey  because of meeting with like minded Eco Fascists? I have never read his manifesto and do not intend to, have never wanted to and never will. At the time he visited Turkey the Tourism industry was warning westerners of the risk of visiting Turkey of the high percentage of Sunni Muslims in Turkey and unrest. But obviously Tarrant felt comfortable going there, and not at risk at all. The Royal Christchurch Inquiry 17 Community Questions were responded to by the Inquiry. One of those questions was “Were the  Muslims in Christchurch fearful of anyone, any group before March 15th 2019.

The Royal Inquiry response to that question was “In the three years up to the Christchurch Terrorist attacks they stated they were fearful of Daesh at the time of Ramadan”. (Not Right Wing Extremism, nor White Supremacy). And now through my research of Eco-Socialism I stumble across the a newspaper article reported on the days of the attacks in Christchurch where the Australian shooter as he is called as an Ethno White Nationalist Eco Fascist.  But this was not the only news article or academic thesis I had read about the shooter and another shooter with a manifesto namely the ‘El Paso shooting that killed 22 people, as he ranted about plastic waste and over consumption. “If we get rid of enough people, then our life can become more sustainable” he concluded. Another article 7th August 2019 ‘What is eco-Fascism’ The ideology behind attacks in El Paso and Christchurch. (Fears of climate change, immigration and overpopulation are driving a new wave of violence. By Luke Darby Aug 7th 2019. He referred the El Paso shooter and his manifesto “An Inconvenient Truth’ after Al Gores 2006 Climate Change documentary. The shooter wrote in his manifesto. “The decimation of the environment is creating a massive burden for future generations. Corporations are heading the destruction of our environment by shamelessly overharvesting resources,” he wrote. “If we can get rid of enough people, then our way of life can be more sustainable.” He also blamed America’s consumer culture for environmental damage. Crusius also claimed that he was inspired by the shooter in Christchurch, New Zealand, who killed 51 people at two mosques and, in his own rambling manifesto, referred to himself as an “eco-fascist.” He described immigration as “environmental warfare,” and claimed “there is no nationalism without environmentalism.”

According to the FBI, ecoterrorism is “the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against innocent victims or property by an environmentally-oriented, subnational group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature.” For many, this likely evokes the image of tree-huggers with bolt-cutters, like the Animal Liberation Front which started breaking into animal testing labs in the ’80s, releasing test subjects and destroying equipment.

Tarrant’s self description reported by those whom had read the manifesto was he described himself ‘not as a conservative, not a Nazi, as a ‘eco naturalist- an ‘eco-fascists’

NOTE: CLICK INSIDE THE IMAGE THIS WILL LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO

https://www.gq.com/story/what-is-eco-fascism

https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/christchurch-shooter-s-manifesto-reveals-an-obsession-with-white-supremacy-over-muslims-20190315-p514ko.html

REFERRING TO ‘ THE RE-EMERGENCE OF ECO-FACISM: WHITE NATIONALUS, SACRIFICE AND PROTO FASCISM IN THE CIRCULATION OF DIGITAL RHETORIC IN THE ECOLOGICAL FAR RIGHT. 152 Pages PDF authored by Jacob Kenton Smith MA and Mentor Leslie A Hahner PhD – the techniques, appeals of eco fascists

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT: Principles for effectively co-governing natural resources in New Zealand.

1.2 Many New Zealanders are taking action to conserve the environment. Throughout New Zealand, iwi, hapū, and community groups are working to monitor, protect, and enhance the health of their environment.

1.3 Some natural resources are “co-governed” – the work to restore or conserve them is led as a result of negotiated decision-making arrangements between iwi and/or other groups, central government, and/or local government. Many of these arrangements have come about after long negotiations, including Treaty of Waitangi settlements. The arrangements have many legal forms and include statutory bodies, trusts, and other relationships.

1.4We looked at a selection of these arrangements to identify what works well and what does not. We wanted to identify factors that need to be considered when setting up and maintaining effective co-governance arrangements.

What we looked at

1.5 We looked at eight examples of co-governance and how co-governance is being used for environmental projects (see Figure 1). The examples are:- Waikato River Authority;- Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority (Auckland); – Te Waihora Co-Governance Agreement (Lake Ellesmere, Canterbury); – Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Strategy Group; – Ngā Poutiriao o Mauao (Tauranga); – Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust (Waikato);- Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Reserves Board; and Parakai Recreation Reserve Board.

Locations of the co-governance examples we looked at

1.6 All the examples involved iwi and local authorities. Some also included community groups. Some arose out of Treaty of Waitangi claims settlements. Others were voluntary, including one that was later formalised through a Treaty settlement.

1.7 We reviewed participants’ experiences and perceptions and used that information to identify what helps to set up and operate co-governance arrangements successfully.

1.8 Although our main interest was in co-governance, we looked at examples that were sometimes a mixture of co-governance and co-management. We identified principles that apply generally to both co-governance and co-management.

1.9 In resource management work, the terms “co-governance” and “co-management” are both used to describe negotiated arrangements between iwi, central government, local government, and/or local groups to achieve effective management of an environmental or conservation resource.

1.10 These terms are sometimes used interchangeably because their definitions are not well understood. Governance focuses on strategic matters, while management is concerned with day-to-day operational responsibilities. When used correctly, the terms can describe the extent of decision-making powers (see Figure 2).
Comparing co-management and co-governance

CO- MANAGEMENT: The collaborative process of decision-making and problem solving within the administration of conservation policy

CO-GOVERNANCE: Arrangements in which ultimate decision-making authority resides with a collaborative body exercising devolved power, this is where power and responsibility are shared between government and local stakeholders

1.11 Where natural resources are managed as part of or after a Treaty settlement, co-governance often means that there are equal numbers of iwi representatives and council members involved. Usually (an exception is the Waikato River Authority), councils retain final decision-making powers over the management of natural resources. This is in keeping with councils’ responsibilities under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government Act 2002.

1.12 In the examples we looked at, some were about governance and others more about management. In some, people’s roles included elements of both governance and management.

1.13 The Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 set up the Waikato River Authority as a co-governance entity. The Waikato River Authority sets the direction for managing the Waikato River in its “Vision and Strategy” document. This document is considered to be part of the Waikato Regional Policy Statement. It is binding on all national, regional, and district policy and decisions for the management of the river.

1.14 The Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority is also a co-governance entity. Auckland Council is responsible for managing the Maunga, under the direction of the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority.

1.15 The Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Strategy Group is charged with providing leadership in putting into effect its vision and strategy for the Rotorua lakes and their catchments. As the governance group, it provides the direction, vision, and strategic oversight for the lakes programme. The strategy group needs to approve any decisions about funding under the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme.

1.16 Local authorities usually control the creation, membership, and disestablishment of joint committees. However, when they are part of Treaty redress, the creation and membership of these committees are agreed between councils and iwi and provided for in Treaty legislation. This is the case for the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Strategy Group. The Te Arawa Lakes Settlement Act 2006 provides for the establishment of a permanent joint committee that can be disestablished only with the agreement of all parties. This means that the Te Arawa Lakes Trust is an equal member with the regional and district councils.

1.17 As we have mentioned, some of the examples we looked at contained elements of co-governance and co-management. The parties to the Te Waihora Co-Governance Agreement told us that their arrangement was “one step away from true co-governance”. However, the partners were clear that they wanted an arrangement that allowed for some form of co-governance:

Ngāi Tahu own the lake bed via the treaty settlement, which must mean something. It’s at the least a very powerful symbol, but not just symbolic. [You] can’t dismiss their view, even though they have no [Resource Management Act] powers.

1.18 Importantly, in this instance, the parties are clear about their limits but also clear about where they want to get to: “[It’s] not quite co-governance … The arrangement starts at co-management, with the mechanism to move to co-governance.” The parties’ agreement confirmed their commitment to “strive toward appropriate vesting of decision-making powers in the Parties as co-governors over the Te Waihora catchment”.

1.19 The members of Ngā Poutiriao o Mauao are clear that they are co-managers. The Mauao Trust, as the owners of the historic reserve, are the governors.

1.20 In the Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust’s case, the Trust has a co-governance structure, where the board is co-chaired by a mana whenua representative and a 3).landowner representative. The Trust members maintain that the co-governance regime ensures that tikanga Māori is incorporated in governance and day-to-day management decisions.

1.21 Responsibility for managing the scenic reserve rests with Waipa District Council. The Council has a working relationship with the Trust to deliver the desired outcomes. For the land within the fenced perimeter but outside the reserve, it is intended that the Trust will manage the land as though part of the scenic reserve. Landowner covenants would cover this management arrangement.

1.24 Because each co-governance arrangement was different, we had lines of questioning to guide our conversations. Basing our questions on our expectations of good governance and leadership, we focused on:-clarity of purpose; roles and responsibilities; capability; accountability and integrity; information and reporting; and financial sustainability.

Structure of this report

1.25- In Part 2, we discuss the importance of effective relationships when setting up and putting into effect co-governance arrangements.

1.26 In Part 3, we discuss how parties need to build and maintain a shared understanding of what they are trying to achieve.

1.27 In Part 4, we discuss how parties need to put in place the processes and understandings about how they will work together to achieve their purpose.

1.28 In Part 5, we discuss how important it is to involve people with the right experience and capacity in setting up and putting into effect co-governance arrangements.

1.29 In Part 6, we discuss how parties need to plan for accountability reporting and financial sustainability.

1.30 Appendices 1-6 provide background information about six of the co-governance examples.

INTERESTING LINKS:-

https://oag.parliament.nz/2016/co-governance/docs/summary.pdf  Summary of our report Principles for effectively co-governing natural resources – Controller-Auditor General  2 pages pdf Principles for effectively co-governing natural resources February 2016  68 page pdf

https://oag.parliament.nz/2016/co-governance/docs/co-governance-amended.pdf (Co-Governance Amended Report)  The Purpose of this Report:–

https://oag.parliament.nz/2016/co-governance/docs/summary.pdf

https://oag.parliament.nz/2016/co-governance/part1.htm (This report)

Reference Source: Dodson, G. (2014), “Co-Governance and Local Empowerment? Conservation Partnership Frameworks and Marine Protection at Mimiwhangata, New Zealand” in Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal (2014) Volume 7, Issue 25, available at www.tandfonline.com.

https://store.thomsonreuters.co.nz/waking-the-taniwha-maori-governance-in-the-21st-century-ebk/productdetail/126608 Thomsonrueters.co.nz

https://www.boardroompractice.co.nz/files/96/file/NZ-govt-owned-companies-pdf 21 pages PDF