Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

UNFAIRLY TARGETING FARMERS – THE 2016 HAVELOCK NORTH WAS USED TO INTRODUCE – THE NEW WATER REGULATOR TAUMATA AROWAI AND THE MAORI ADVISORY BOARD

UNFAIRLY TARGETING FARMERS – THE 2016 HAVELOCK NORTH WAS USED TO INTRODUCE –    THE NEW WATER REGULATOR TAUMATA AROWAI AND THE MAORI ADVISORY BOARD

Initially Accusations & Speculations were a reality to the farmers whom were blamed for the  Campylobacter outbreak  in Havelock North in August 2016, An estimated  5,500 people, 15 approx hospital admissions & 3  reported contributed deaths. There were political discussions and the Green Party blamed the Farmers for Intensification of  Farming practices as being the fault of the contamination

Federated Farmers & other Agricultural Representatives strongly rejected the claims pointing out that the area new the specific bore in question  was primarily lifestyle blocks and orchards not Intensive Dair Farming. It was concluded the source of contamination was likely from sheep faeces that flowed into a surface pond & then into an insecure bore

The Govt Inquiry attributed the blame on the Systemic failings by Hawkes Bay Regional Council & the Hastings District Council for their lack of collaboration * inadequate Risk Assessments & the failure to ensure Bore Security & Proper Water Treatment. The initial finger pointing at farmers caused a significant negative effect on the farming communities reputation. NZ First stated the Farmers are owed an apology as it was clarified the actual source was the Councils significant failings.

Farmers had been treated unfairly , were targeted by misleading and alarmist claims by Anti Lobbyists without a shred of evidence. There was finger pointing at agriculture,  yet the closest dairy farms was 40 kilometers away. It was reported that farmers had spent $1 billion fencing rivers over the past decade.

The Havelock August 2016 Incident imposed new restrictions & obligations on farmers as key land users in water catchments. Councils were blamed, criticized for the lack of collaboration * Inadequate Risk Assessment * Failure to implement required Water Safety Plans & Monitoring which was said to contribute to the outbreak occurring. The Havelock North Incidence highlighted tensions around water and land use in NZ, leading to more management & regulations nationwide.

Regional Councils eg Hawkes Bay Regional Council was required to implement stricter rules and planning changes (Like a TANK plan Change) which included the development & implementation of Farm Plans. Introduced more rigorous standards & restrictions, scrutiny and more rigorous national standards. This leading to increased regulations & restrictions on Agricultural practices & policy changes

The prompting of calls for a more Sustainable Less Intensive Farming methods. Including a cap on the use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, a measure that directly impacts many farmers. The Havelock North 2016 Incident  although Farmers were not to blame led to broader regulatory shifting, restriction on land use practices especially agriculture right across NZ. (was this just another Crisis opportunity ‘Never let a Good Crisis Go to Waste)that this was in  1 of the bore heads (Same location as the August 2016 incident)

The independent Stu Clark 1998 Report concluded that the 2 Bores were a possible source of campylobacteriosis.. The likely point of entry for  contaminated surface water was a leaking power cable gland. It was recommended that testing the Te Mata Aquifer to establish whether it was confined along with measured to ensure security of both bores.

The Regional Council failed to meet its responsibilities as set out by the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) to act as Guardian of the Aquifers under the Heretaunga Plains Protection of Water Sources. The District Council did not embrace- implement the high standard of care requires of a public drinking water supplier in light of the 1998 outbreak and the significant history of transgressions. The breaching of Drinking Water Standards

The District Council did not properly manage the maintenance of plant equipment or keep records of that work, carried out little to no supervisions of follow-up work. Did not carry out recommended improvements. There was a lack of collaboration and liaison  between the Regional Council and the District Council. A strained relationship with an absence of regular and meaningful cooperations resulted in missed opportunities that may have prevented the out break

Consultancy firm MWH New Zealand Ltd (“MWH”), a technical adviser to the District Council, failed competently to assess and report on the security of the bore heads of Brookvale Road bores 1 and 2. The Inquiry found that near the Brookvale Rd Bores the Aquifer had been penetrated by a significant number of disused or uncapped bores leaving it vulnerable to entry by contaminated water. That the Brookvale RD Bore 3 was affected by earthworks at the neighboring Te Mata Mushroom property, leaving it vulnerable to contaminated water

The Te Mata Aquifer was not a secure source of drinking water- non compliant to Drinking Water standards. That the Regional and District Councils relationship was dysfunctional. The Regional Council filed a criminal prosecution against the Regional Council 18th November 2016 which led to a delay in the Inquiry.

It was stated that this was ill advised and never should have been launched . It was eventually dropped and replaced with two infringement notices. The Regional Council spent $450,000 investigating the case. This could have been spent on the Aquifers beneath the Heretaunga Plains

It was reported that the risk associated with waterborne diseases in NZ are well recognized. The Drinking Water Guidelines emphazise that ‘Untreated drinking water contaminated with pathogens presents a significant risk to human health. Therefore lessons need to be learned from the Havelock North Incident.

But was has Central Government learned. First they blame the farmers unjustifiably so. Yet 23 years later successive governments have turned deliberately absent minded- where the Local Govt Act 2002 still remains with the same errors as when it was presented to the House. Where Trade Waste Consent Breeches still remain a cause of significant concern. Where Stats  that were present a couple of years ago now  the 2024-2025 Stats for Trade Waste Consent breaches are clearly absent from the publics eye.

Where on 8th September 2025 Taumata Arowai Maori Group report that the Māori Advisory Group advises on Māori interests and knowledge as they relate to the objectives, functions and operating principles as they set out their expectations & intentions to work as partners to advise on Maori Interests

The Maori Advisory Group provides advice on how to enable Matauranga Maori * Tikanga Maori and Kaitiakitanga to be exercised. Any other matters as agreed by the Maori Advisory Group and the Board. Environmental management and Iwi Maori development working with Central Government agencies, Local Government- Iwi and Hapu. The Freshwater Iwi Leaders Group and the member of the Ministerial Advisory group Kahui Wai Maori ..In  Sustain the Tangata,

December 2019 The Bill was introduced to the House. The 1st March 2021 The Act took effecr an Order in Council and Taumata Arowai became a Crown entity. The Act sets out the objectives and functions allows for the board and Maori Advisory Group to be established. The Taumata Arowai and Three Waters Reform Program Iwi & Maori Hui a motu. And the Taumata Arowai and Three Waters Reform Programme Iwi & Maori Pre-workshop Water Services Bill webner on You Tube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iptBF0rRWNs) Dept of Internal Affairs

https://www.taumataarowai.govt.nz/about-us/who-we-are/maori-advisory-group

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

LINKS

Footnotes

  1. Stu Clark “Hastings District Council Water Supply Contamination Investigation’’ (13 September 1998).  This report is documentCB048of the “Core Bundle of Documents” and is accessible on the Inquiry website (http://www.dia.govt.nz/Core-bundle-documents).
  2. A confined aquifer is protected by a layer or layers of impermeable material.
  3. A report in August 2016 by GNS found water from three of the bores in the area (Omahu and Wilson roads in Hastings and Brookvale Road bore 1 in Havelock North) contained water less than a year old: GNS “Groundwater Residence Time Assessment of Hastings District Council Water Supply Wells in the Context of the Drinking-water Standards for New Zealand” (2016) (CB081).
  4. CB192.
...

Other Blog Posts

Carol Sakey
MONETARY SYSTEM

TANE MAHUTA THE MONEY TREE OF NEW ZEALAND ‘SAPPING YOUR MONEY’

Central Banks are in most countries worldwide. The IMF have significantly helped achieve what Central Banks have become, totally independent and in practice no accountable to any financial system. To create a public consensus for structural reform they must purposely create a recession and to prolong it as well, thus creating a mass abuse of power, is extremely costly, manipulative and can be severely damaging to people lives

Crisis structural changes in policies and banking systems a roadmap to banking systems becoming a Central Bank Digital Currency transformation

The Bank of International Settlements are referenced to central bank rates which are higher interest  rates, this forces other institutions to increase their interest rates, makes the cost of borrowing so high that business becomes impacted negatively.

Each Central Bank I n each UN Nation States  their national currencies are owned by the State. Declining growth and corporate profit risks weakening a country’s currency. The Reserve Bank NZ (NZ Central Bank) has now been named ‘Te Patea Mahuta’. This is New Zealand’s future of CBDC (Reported 6/12/2021). Includes the description of key terms  used to support the RBNZ

Tane Mahuta has become the mandate, the future of money in NZ. RBNZ  have reported that Maori official reference will be made to Tene Mahuta when it comes to the future of money in NZ. Describing ‘Te Toto’ as the sap of the tree that represents the Reserve Bank of NZ future banking system. The Reserve Bank Of New Zealand states that Tane Huta represents the ecosystems in NZ from a financial structure of RBNZ (Central Bank Of NZ). Referring to high level policy making RBNZ state it would be useful to establish CBDC  in NZ. Stating the RBNZ is the ‘Kaitiaki o te toto’ the steward of money in NZ, a dynamic monetary financial system, a stable anchor for convertibility, an opportunity to broaden central bank money which will be available for All individuals, communities, businesses. As they refer to high policy opportunities, referring to CBDC as  to  improving technological forms, thus a  CBDC future for NZ. CBDC Pay and Save a gateway to the formal financial sector, supporting wider inclusions by prioritizing government programs

CBDC and Ecosystems as a distribution model as acting as a catalyst in the payments of ecosystems enabling NZ to take part in global initiatives that use CBDC payments innovation system and to crowd out other innovations. 2021 RBNZ was looking for feedback on their Tane Mahuta narrative, the design to incorporate CBDC, advertising themselves and their stewardship of money as holistic, this underpinning their CBDC role in NZ. A Reserve Bank Of NZ (RBNZ) with strategic elements represented in Taner Mahuta (the objective is CBDC). Tane Mahuta the money tree that is controlled by the State. Crisis events, a series of crisis events to change, transform the banking structural system.  Freedoms and CBDC in competition as Governments protect those in privileged positions to extend control over peoples money, hence also peoples lives.

This is the digital revolution, transformation of transforming currencies and finance. The professor of Trade Policy and Economics of Cornell University gave a very blunt assessment of CBDC’s saying “Central Banks will take money out of peoples accounts to conduct monetary policy. There is no free society. Your money is NOT really your money, your property rights are subservient to the ‘Public Good’, this is the necessity of managing the nations economy”

CBDC protects governments that have given themselves a privileged position to exert control over peoples money, hence control over people themselves. Central Banks are an agent for the government in terms of implementing fiscal policy. CBDC is the fiscal agent of the government. RBNZ stating it is critical to regulate Cryptocurrency because it poses a risk to CBDC. CBDC leaves your information at risk of cyber attacks, devaluation and increasing  censorship, eroding purchasing power, it is a great risk to our freedoms. The RBNZ has been wholly owned by the government since 1936 when it was established by an Act in Parliament and constituted under the Reserve Bank Act 2021.

The RBNZ Tane Mahuta CBDC NARRATIVE, NZ’S Central Bank Future Money CBDC, government controlled that is incompatible with economic, political freedoms. RBNZ Tane Mahuta Climate Change Strategy through crisis transforming the banking system in NZ.

Researched By Carol Sakey

...

ONE HEALTH SURVEILLANCE IN NEW ZEALAND SOONER THAN YOU THINK ‘CONTROL ALL LIVING BEINGS’

Otago University Prof David Murdoch spoke about the concept of the One Health Approach, saying this is going to be sooner than you think, this One Health  Approach to Disease surveillance. Describing this as an integrated, unifying approach for Humans, Animals-Wild and Domestic, Plants, Oceans, Estuaries, Rivers, Soil, Air the whole Eco-system.

An ecosystem is a geographic area where plants, animals, and other organisms, as well as weather and landscape, work together to form a bubble of life. This is how the academics, government explain eco-systems to a child “An ecosystem is made up of the interaction of all living organisms (like animals, plants, and bugs) in an area with all of the non-living organisms (like water, dirt, rocks, and the sun).

Academics, Governments, NGO and corporate ventures etc., are using a ‘One Health Approach to ward of any future threats (ANY)

So, academics are saying ““Increased urbanization, overcrowded living conditions, increased global migration, and the increasing push of humans into animal habitat has created an environment that promotes the transmission of infections and made the COVID-19 pandemic possible.”. BUT  this is what they are promoting the future slums of called Smart Cities. C40 Cities with mass migration entrenched into urbanization. (Reference Mayor Migration Declarations- Mayors Migration Council- Mayors Mitigation with C40 Cities).  Auckland has won a C40 Award for their acceleration and promotion of the 100 city C40 City Network under Phil Goff which was resigned before the new mayor took over. (Wayne Brown).

C40 Cities network Dietary Plan-Plant Based Foods targeting farmers within highly populated areas. No Farmers No Food.. ah well eat tree’s and beetle bugs this is barking up the wrong tree so to speak.

Professor David Murdoch says “COVID-19 has thrust into focus the impact of humanity’s changing relationship with the environment”. In other words the ‘One Health Approach’

NO SURPRISES HERE:- Prof David Murdoch Otago University Flagship Research Council of New Zealand  funded by ..Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

The Lancet One Health Commission called for transdisciplinary collaboration promoting and generating solutions to complex health challenges. COVID19 Pandemic recognizes the fundamental connectedness of humans, animals and the whole eco system.   CRISIS  CRISIS   CRISIS   CONTROL EVERYTHING

Of course, if you do not oppose the concept of a One Health Approach this equates to ‘Silence is Consent’

LINK:  https://www.otago.ac.nz/hekitenga/2020/otago742802.html

 

...
Carol Sakey
TOTALATARIANISM

KIA-ORA ‘NORTH KOREA’ BLAIR’S WARTIME DRACONIAN LAWS ARE INTRODUCED IN NEW ZEALAND

New Zealand Government has the ability to detain you as long as they want without you committing a crime.

Just reading Avi Yemini’s Tee Shirt ‘Kia-ora North Korea’ as he entered NZ made me think of the research I had done 2 years ago on Tony Blairs established ‘Fixated Threat Assessment Centre’ (FTAC) which was reported by the Daily Mao; News on 27/5/2007 as ‘Tony Blairs Stalker Squad’. His quietly set up FTAC. Where suspects could be detailed indefinitely by using mental health laws. Those people that accuse the govt of using draconian measures of abusing human rights risk being detained. These were people who are thought to pose a risk to MP, public figures, the Royal family. Giving the govt sweeping powers to check, analyze more than 10,000 suspects

Anyone thought to have a ‘fixated behavior  or fixated way of thinking, is thought of being a risk. The governments holding the power to forcibly detain suspects in mental health units without trial, without evidence, without criminal conviction, without any crime being committed. Where the line is blurred between criminal and clinical investigations. Because of confidentiality suspects were not identified, therefore no-one was able to know how many suspects are forcibly  detained. The Atlantic Times reported ‘UK Enforces Law that Bans Public from Criticizing the Government’, describing a British citizens being detained in a mental health unit under Blairs ‘little known laws’. Allowing police power to arrest, detain anyone who voices criticism against MPs.

Blairs FTAC legally being able to detain people for indefinite periods of time without trial, without evidence, without a crime being committed, with limited rights to appeal. A number of British people have fallen prey to Blairs North Korean Communist tactic. Activist David Campon was imprisoned without criminal charges in a London Mental Health Hospital when he publicly associated himself with the International Tribunal into crimes by the Church and State against children, which held the Crown of England responsible for crimes against children. He and other activists convened a Common Law Court to enforce warrants against child abuser and convicted felons.

Outspoken MP Andrews Lansley was reported to have said “the law can be used to target anyone with religious, political, cultural beliefs. The Government is trying to widen the definition of ‘mental health’ disorders. Their intentions are questionable” where Govt can order suspects to undergo mental health intervention when they do not have a mental health disorder. The British Govt under Blair then passed a Bill in which the Courts could mandate  civil and criminal matters in a private court without suspects who were detained every knowing about this happening, where the govt chose a court advocate to represent the suspect.

State Tyranny likened to that of North Korea. Evening Standard 27/5/2007 News headed “Shambles of Blairs plan referring to ‘Draconia wartime Powers’, where anyone can be stopped and questioned about their ID and Movements. Refusing to comply would impose 5,000 pound fines. Civil liberties groups warned that just be a civil matter of dropping a piece of litter risks being detained and having DNA taken.

The arresting, detaining people just on suspicion on the grounds you may be plotting something. That was Britain 2007 under Blairs Government. 2017 NZ Government. Ministry Of Health reported due to consistent overseas research NZ was piloting Tony Blairs draconian WARTIME PLAN. July 1st 2019 the whole concept of Tony Blairs Fixated Threat Assessment Centre was established permanently in New Zealand. Yes ‘Kiaora North Korea’. This being overseen by a senior official governance group officials from three participating agencies. Parliamentary police, Special Mental Health Officials and NZ Police. The collaboration of the three just as it was in Tony Blairs Government, and as it is now. And has also been adopted by Victoria’s government (Daniel Andrews). Fixated behavior by Blairs plan referred to Newspaper adverting, posters, emails to MPs and Emails to police and many other thought led motivations, suspicions- the thought police. Predictable behaviors that do not fit a mechanism of being a criminal.

An FYI (Official request ) for information from the government for details of people detained in the FTAC in NZ was requested. For the dates between 2017- 2020. The number of people, gender, religion, age of those that had been detained. The response by Director of National Intelligence NZ Police to all questions was ‘Non-Applicable’. Therefore we do not know who may be detained, being forced into mental health intervention, treatmentTransparency Zilch. Kiaora North Korea ‘Avi Yemini is so right’

 

https://fyi-org.nz/request/14292-fixated-threat-assessment-related-query January 19th 2021

‘KIAORA’ NORTH KOREA ‘ NZ TAKES ON BLAIRS DRACONIAN WARTIME QUESTIONING..The State give themselves sweeping powers to analyze anyone under suspicion, the ‘Thought’ Police in action. Blair, Ardern and Daniel Andrews.

 

 

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

PARLIAMENT LEGIZLATED THE TE TIRITI o WAITANGI. ‘The Te Tiriti o Waitangi did not create Partnerships nor Principles’

Nothing in this Act shall permit the Crown to act in a manner that is inconsistent with the Principles of the Treaty. First tie the Principles of the Treaty had been documented) There are NO Principles in the Treaty Of Waitangi 1840.

1985 Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act. While the 1975 Treaty of Waitangi Act was about the settlement of historical grievances, the 1985 Amendment Act was a very different matter. The recognition of iwi-Māori rather than pan-Māori as the inheritors of Treaty settlements established the reviving tribe as both political player and economic corporation.

1985 Amendment Act, Deputy Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer agreed to Sir Hepi Te Heuheu’s request to insert the clause “Nothing in this Act shall permit the Crown to act in a manner that is inconsistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi” into Section 9 of the State-owned Enterprises Act 1986. This is the first reference in legislation or policy to the principles of the Treaty – indeed, the first indication that the Treaty has principles. Parliament did not define the principles — an unconscionable failure which opened the way for the courts and government officials to determine what is probably one of the most important political events of the 20th century. Treaty principles, including that of partnership, now appear in almost all legislation.

1987 Court of Appeal decision stating that the Treaty established a relationship “akin to a partnership”. Although the judges likened it to the obligation partners in a partnership had they did not say that the Treaty actually created a partnership. Nor did it. However, “partnership” was quickly picked up by the Waitangi Tribunal and by the 1987 Iwi Leaders’ Forum. From that time this powerful interest group has achieved enormous success in claiming constitutional change and ownership rights. “Partnership” is the justification. The possibility that the He Puapua Report will be implemented either in full or modified form demonstrates the group’s success to date.

VALUABLE LINKS:

https://www.nzcpr.com/the-road-to-he-puapua-is-there-really-a-treaty-partnership/

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/m%C3%A2ori-party%E2%80%99s-head-clouds-over-non-binding-un-declaration Horomia speech

https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/assets/Publications/Ecosystem-services-in-New-Zealand/2_3_Christie.pdf

. https://www.treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2013-07/ltfs-13-bg-nrs.pdf  37 pages pdf

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2017-12/Natural%20Resources.pdf

https://www.tearawhiti.govt.nz/assets/Tools-and-Resources/Providing-for-the-Treaty-of-Waitangi-in-legislation.pdf

 

...