THE DANGER IN THE TERMINOLOGY ‘FOR THE COMMON GOOD’

Especially in politics you hear ‘For The Common Good’, but who is it that determines this. Are they appealing for the ‘Common Good’ when defending their own positions of interests. Universal health care, the jabs are mandated for the ‘common good’ eem of whom? Yes and this is usually about restrictions of the rights of individuals to freely choose what they believe is good for them. “The many outweigh the needs of the few”.  Yes there are significant dangers with this conception of the ‘Common good’ and the curbing, limiting of freedoms, the freedom to make ones own individual choice.

UNESCO and World Health Org., (UN)  Education 2030 All UN Nation States have enforced an Sexuality and Relationship Education in every classroom universally. The universal sexually grooming of children the watching of porn in children’s classrooms, how can this be for the universal common good of all humankind, its not its just sheer evil and extremely criminal but they get away with it. We are yet to be shown the full fallout from this in mental heal, physical, emotional, medical health impacts, I shudder to think and it still continues. How can these politicians allow this to happen to our children, thank God I pray that this coalition government of New Zealand will stop this in its tracks. The prior government, and that includes two of the coalition should own up to their part in this sexuality grooming of our children. The Local Government, Auckland Council for the Drag Queens in Libraries story times for young children. Drag Queens are for ‘Grandpa Happy Road’ not the grandkids. Shame on you Auckland Council. Tell me “do you believe this is for the good of all children”? (Shame, shame on you’s)

The ’Common Good’ can be the ‘Commonly bad’ the expansion of government power and the loss of individual freedoms. More power to the authoritarian government and more harm to the people. The ‘Common Good’ for the Elite class and those that seek power to control and destroy others. (Known as the Ruling Class and the Dictators of this world). The “Common Good” is invoked to expand the power of rulers at the expense of the ruled, but it gives the process a veneer of morality.

J.R.R. Tolkien illustrates this danger in his classic The Lord of the Rings. After the wizard Saruman’s defeat, he begs Gandalf to join with him so together they can overthrow Sauron and rule Middle Earth. Note how he tempts the virtuous Gandalf:

“Much we could still accomplish together, to heal the disorders of the world. Let us understand one another, and dismiss from thought these lesser folks! Let them wait on our decisions! For the common good I am willing to redress the past, and to receive you. Will you not consult with me? Will you not come up?” (emphasis added).

What Saruman really wanted was power; he was using the Common Good to advance himself, not the people. However, the result is greater power to those who are supposed to serve us, but instead rule us. Individuals and families lose their rights, and the government gains power. So here I am referring I guess to the ‘Ruling class good) those whom have self interests those that will benefit the most, it’s definitely not about the rights and freedoms of individuals to choose.  11th December 2020 Oxfam reported they were disappointed NZ Government at the time would not back a peoples vaccine for coronavirus (Oxfam New Zealand’s Communications and Advocacy Director Dr Joanna Spratt said

“In the name of the common good, public authorities are bound to respect the fundamental and inalienable rights of the human person” (CCC 1907). It is only by respecting individual and family rights against government expansion that the Common Good can truly be achieved. The Jacinda Ardern responded that the government had the purchasing power to persuade pharmaceutical corporations to voluntarily share their COVID19 intellectual property and technology saying ´  “There simply comes a time when humanity’s common good must take precedence over private profit. This is that time. The only way we can truly put an end to the coronavirus pandemic is by providing a free vaccine to everyone in the world who needs one.” Dangerous very sad times “For the Common Good Of All” Just how many people died from the COVID Jab, I would say far, far too many and how many serious injuries, there is zilch transparency maybe for the common good of all, all being them the politicians themselves.. FOR THEIR COMMON GOOD. And Ardern wanted to jab all of humanity on this planet (Source of information Oxfam NZ Media Release)

Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ

MANY GROUPS WITH MAORI BLOOD DO NOT CALL THEMSELVES INDIGENOUS

The terminology ‘Indigenous Peoples’ first came to NZ in the early 1970’s.

President of the UN World Indigenous Council visited to NZ in early 1970. Also visited Aborigine in the Northern Territories of Australia thus the expansion of this terminology worldwide

Please visit my video link below for further information

How did this terminology enter New Zealand learn more from my video. Click on the image which will link you to my video

Indigenous Peoples in transforming our world have an invested interest in United Nations Agenda 21, universal global development goals, which is extremely strong and hypo-political. Indigenous Indicators are integrated into UN Agenda 2030. (Indicators  (1.42 )and (5 a 1 ) on land Iwi/Maori interests and rights. This is established at a global level, is actioned, promoted at a country level thus advancing UN Agenda 2030, monitoring, measuring, promoting Indigenous  tribal progress as to UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals at a local level. This is reported as a work in progress.

A UN  high level political meeting referenced to in a 2030 Resolution follow up review  A/RES/701299)  11^th July 2016  which included thematic discussions with Indigenous peoples at the very core of UN Agenda 2030, as  Indigenous Tribal Rights, Indigenous Development Goals .are reported to be essential self-determination to accelerate promote growth modification

Indigenous Indicators embedded in UN Agenda 2030 key players in NZ are Iwi Elite in partnership with NZ Government. Global, regional, national political forums support the framework of this strategic plan to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 in New Zealand, with UN Member State governments facilitating Indigenous Peoples at national level to be given ‘rights’ that other do not have (As per non-binding agreement 2007 UNDRIP). The using of Indigenous Agenda 2030 indicators, with specific measurements through an established Iwi/Māori Digital Sovereignty, an Iwi tribal Sovereignty with Iwi Aspirations

Prof. Dawn Freshwater of Auckland University documented  an article referencing Iwi/Maori knowledge to research Disinformation and to tackle UN Agenda 2030 goals, to drive the global development goals of Agenda 2030 in relation to climate change and the  decolonization agenda.

Iwi/Māori  Elite have the ability to interrogate information to maximize impacts through Indigenous Sovereignty Data transferred, translated into different contexts.

The United Nations Association of NZ hosted an Advancing Agenda 2030 Conference  in the  Banquet Hall in Parliament. It was  reported that NZ was at mid-point to achieving UN Agenda 2030 however accelerated actions are needed. The conference highlighted  key speakers such as  Ashley Bloomfield .

Other speakers were Ibrahim Omer, Carolyn Schwaiger NZ Representative to the UN New York, Mary Wareham Advocacy Director of the Arms Div., of the human Rights watch and Sophie Handford Kapiti Coast District Council.

Topics at the gathering included ‘Climate Change, reforming the UN and countering Disinformation. Hosted by the UN Association NZ.  And also New Zealand advances UN Agenda 2030 through Iwi/Maori Digital Sovereignty and multi-stakeholder partnership with the government implemented at a High Political Level by the UN as to Indigenous Peoples Rights to ‘self determination’. Co-Governance in NZ.

Researched By Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ

WHERE ARE THE REPORTS ABOUT HEALTH AND SAFETY AS TO THE PUBLIC WEARING FACIAL MASKS DURING COVID AS A MANDATORY RESTRICTION??  ARE THEY SAFE????  WakeUpNZ..Carol Sakey

MAY 9TH 2023 A NEW STUDY SUGGESTS THAT EXCESS CARBON DIOXIDE BREATHED UIN BY MASK WEARERS CAN HAVE A MAJOR HEALTH CONSEQUENCES. Evidence continues to supports that mandating face mask wearing was one of those worst mandatory health restrictions made in modern history worldwide. The Cochrane Report referring to “probably makes little to no difference in prevention of the spread of viruses”. The report quantifying the harms caused by mask wearing. A new study in Germany referring to ‘excess carbon dioxide breathed in by mask wearers can have substantial ill effects on health, also referencing  pregnant women and their unborn children

It is reported that mask wearers breathe in greater amounts of air, without a mask on this would have been expelled out through the body, that ‘fresh air has around 0.04% CO@ whilst chronic exposure of CO2 levels of 0.3 percent is toxic’. So how much CO2 levels do face mask wearers breathe in is the question? The authors of the report state that ‘“masks bear a possible chronic exposure to low level carbon dioxide of 1.41–3.2% CO2 of the inhaled air in reliable human experiments’

This relates to 8 times the normal level of the CO2 is toxic, the research suggests that mask wearers, specifically those that wear masks longer than 5 minutes at a time are breathing in 35 to 80 times normal levels. The German study aimed to investigate the toxicological effects of face masks in terms of CO2 rebreathing on developing life, specifically for pregnant women and unborn children, children and adolescents. Despite low levels of risks of severe COVID effects on children they have also been subject to mandates, and there is evidence that masks do not work.

The authors of the Cochrane Report writes that  “at levels between 0.05% and 0.5% CO2,” one might experience an “increased heart rate, increased blood pressure and overall increased circulation with the symptoms of headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, dizziness, rhinitis, and dry cough.”

Rates above 0.5 percent can lead to “reduced cognitive performance, impaired decision-making and reduced speed of cognitive solutions.” Beyond 1 percent, “the harmful effects include respiratory acidosis, metabolic stress, increased blood flow and decreased exercise tolerance.” Again, mask-wearers are likely breathing in CO2 levels between 1.4 percent and 3.2 percent—well above any of these thresholds. What’s more, “Testes metabolism and cell respiration have been shown to be inhibited increasingly by rising levels of CO2.”

High blood pressure, reduced thinking ability, respiratory problems, and reproductive concerns are among the many possible results of effectively poisoning oneself by breathing in too much carbon dioxide. It is reported that “it is clear that carbon dioxide rebreathing, especially when using N95 masks, is above the 0.8% CO2 limit set by the US Navy to reduce the risk of stillbirths and birth defects on submarines with female personnel who may be pregnant.” In other words, mandates have forced pregnant women to wear masks resulting in levels of CO2 inhalation that would be prohibited if they were serving on a Navy submarine.

There exists “circumstantial evidence that popular mask use  may be related to the significant rise of 28% to 33% stillbirths worldwide. Also that of reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance of two full standard deviations in scores in children born during the pandemic.” Citing recent data from Australia which shows  that ‘lockdown restrictions and other measures (including masks that have been mandatory in Australia), in the absence of high rates of COVID-19 disease, were associated with a significant increase in stillborn births.” Meantime, “no increased risk of stillbirths was observed in Sweden,” which famously defied the public-health cabal and went its own way in setting Covid policies.

As for countries where mask-wearing has long been common, the authors write, “Even before the pandemic, in Asia the stillbirth rates have been significantly higher” than in Eurasia, Oceania, or North Africa. It has been also pointed out that this data has been known for 6o years. This is why the authors of this report write for the ‘Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)’, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has CO2 threshold limits of 3 percent for 15 minutes and 0.5 percent for eight hours in workplace ambient air. Yet the CDC has been perhaps the primary pusher of masks in the United States.

The study focused only on CO2, but the authors note that “other noxious agents in the masks contribute to toxicological long-term effects like the inhalation of synthetic microfibers, carcinogenic compounds and volatile organic compounds.” They add that “the increased carbon dioxide content of the breathing air behind the mask may also lead to a displacement of oxygen.” Masks are also uncomfortable and unhygienic, and they profoundly compromise human social interaction.

Lets not forget how people catch viruses though their eyes and that’s a fact.

In light of all this, it seems indefensible to mandate—or even to advise—the wearing of masks, especially among the young. The authors write, “Keeping in mind the weak antiviral mask efficacy, the general trend of forcing mask mandates even for the vulnerable subgroups is not based on sound scientific evidence and not in line with the obligation in particular to protect born or unborn children from potential harmful influences.”

Public-health officials—and the executive-branch leaders who credulously listened to them—ignored centuries of Western norms, the best medical evidence, and common sense, deciding that their own novel and evidence-free course was the one that all of society should be forced to follow. We should never again indulge such an obvious and destructive misstep.

This Report was published by Jeffrey H. Anderson is president of the American Main Street Initiative, a think tank for everyday Americans. He served as director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics at the U.S. Department of Justice from 2017 to 2021.

Researched By Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-harm-caused-by-masks