CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

CDC ARE ENCOURAGING COVID19 TO BE TEACHABLE IN SCHOOLS

How schools can support COVID-19 vaccine confidence
• Encourage teachers and staff to share their COVID-19 vaccination stories on social media and/or through school. Seeing adults they trust getting the COVID-19 vaccine can spur students to talk with their families and also put their minds at ease about vaccination.
• Invite students to wear their COVID-19 vaccination stickers to school.
• Recruit a set of teachers to host a school-wide art or writing contest about COVID-19.
• Display age-appropriate COVID-19 vaccine educational posters around the school building and in classrooms.
• MAKE COVID19 A TEACHABLE MOMENT-Discuss lessons about COVID19 and vaxes, incorporate into school subjects.
School districts can do their part in promoting well child visits as an opportunity to address any other special health and development needs — especially any that arose during the pandemic such as behavior and mental health concerns. See Resources for Encouraging Routine Childhood Vaccinations for more information.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/planning/school-located-clinics/how-schools-can-support.html

...

DOES A DEATH CULT EXIST UNDER THE VEIL OF COVID19?

In November The Defender wrote to the New Zealand Ministry of Health (MOH) to ask some important questions about the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide in New Zealand.

In light of the serious deficiencies in the End of Life Choice Act (EOLCA), and concerns that have been raised by healthcare professionals, we felt it was crucial to put some urgent questions to the MOH.

In our Official Information Act (OIA) request we asked the following question:
“Could a patient who is severely hospitalised with Covid-19 potential
ly be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Act if a health practitioner viewed their prognosis as less than 6 months?”
There were several reasons why The Defender wanted to seek clarity from the MOH about this issue. One of those being the vague interpretation of what determines , qualifies as a ‘terminal illness’

Firstly, New Zealand is currently described as being in a precarious position when it comes to COVID-19 and hospital resources. In light of this, it would not be hard to envisage a situation in which a speedy and sizeable rise in COVID-19 hospitalisations could result in pressure to utilise euthanasia and assisted suicide as tools to resolve such a serious crisis.

Overseas commentators have raised the prospect of these kind of unethical motivations since early in this pandemic.

The Defender News Media have created a petition to Parliament calling to have David Seymour’s Euthanasia Act to be amended urgently (End Of Life Choice)
Ever since Seymour’s Bill (End Of Life Choice) was introduced to parliament I have had serious concerns about the dangerous concepts that exist within it. I view the word ‘Choice’ used within the title of the Act as being a psychological drawcard. Everyone’s loves a choice.

When members of Parliament voted as to this euthanasia Bill last year, under the veil of COVID19 it was not a party political vote, it was an individual vote. One of heart, emotions etc., I believe the facts as to the serious risks that could eventuate were not taken into consideration. And how many people would unnecessarily seek to prematurely end their lives due to serious circumstances that no health professional could ever know about. That no political act could regulate.

In my rumble video I explain in greater depth what I deem to be the dangerous concepts of Seymour’s Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide Act that became law last month (November 2021).

I also express my concern as to whether we the citizens of New Zealand under residing under an institutionalized state death cult, that has been introduced under the veil of COVID19.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE ARROW WITHIN THE IMAGE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO WHERE I AIR MY SERIOUS CONCERNS AND THAT OF OTHERS.

IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED UP TO MY WEBSITE YET PLEASE DO SO NOW, THANK YOU.

...

WHEN ‘NUDGE’ COMES TO SHOVE PUSH RIGHT BACK

Behavioural Science Aotearoa (BSA)  is actually a ‘Nudge Unit’.  ‘Nudge Units’ are used worldwide to subtly and sometimes in your face of  enabling desired outcomes for political policy making, regulations, laws.  Understanding peoples behaviour through using AI digital Re-Imaginings .
The NZ Government calls this giving small tweaks to seek the desired income from the citizens of New Zealand. Measuring effects of messages on behaviour outcomes

Like some authoritarian Iwi that collaborate with Ardern they  ‘Nudge’  Maori into not taking part in protests by referring to ‘Get your Mana back’.  In other words they are indiscreetly,  in a subtle way saying you have lost your Mana by opposing the governments restrictions, taking part in protests  “you lose your mana”  Which equates to ‘Nudge’, nudge don’t take part in protests and you will get your Mana back”   This is just one example being used. (Nudge Theory)

Another, in the Grey Power Newspaper “Grandparents be good role models for your grandchildren, get the shot in the arm show”  More ‘Nudging’ so that more New Zealanders are guineapig participants”

The United Nation Environmental Programme authored a book entitled ‘The little Book of Green Nudges’, a quick guide to reducing environmental impacts on campuses worldwide..  An Environmental Nudge refers to promoting desired behaviours through subtle changes in choice environment. These are passive and active.  This is all about behavioural modification, re-engineering of behaviour through a cognitive process, how to change human actions.

‘Nudging’ farmers to comply with water restrictions. Nudging techniques to promote Zero Carbons by 2030. As governments worldwide take part in ‘Behavioural Conferences.  Making a difference ‘Nudging for Policy Change’, introducing Digital Toolkits and Frameworks.  Mainstreaming behavioural Insights across Governments worldwide.

Behavioural Science used in Public Policy making, promoting the re-engineering of individual, groups behaviour. Gearing up the ‘Nudge Units’ to introduce stricter regulations to achieve their Zero Carbons . Behaviour change is a core component to achieving more inclusive and sustainable outcomes

The Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), also known unofficially as the “Nudge Unit“, … BIT has an office in Sydney, Australia, and in Wellington, New Zealand.

David Halpern is Chief Executive of the Behavioural Insights Team. … In 2015, David wrote a book about the team: “Inside the Nudge Unit:.  2021 ‘ The Behavioural Insights Team, The Nudge Unit. … this work have just been published in the New Zealand Medical Journal. Science is shaping how you behave

The ‘Nudge Thoery’ is a concept in behavioural economics, political theory, and behavioral sciences that promotes, acts upon  indirect suggestions as ways to influence the behaviour and decision-making of groups or individuals.

Ardern has over-extended her controls using the ‘Nudge Theory’.

‘Nudging’ can even over-ride peoples values, and be very unethical, violates civil liberties, human rights.

Nudge theory describes how indirect suggestions and positive reinforcement can influence decision-making. We used nudge theory to implement a trafficlight system.

2018 NHS England rolled out ‘Nudge Theory’, a digital traffic light system to decrease hospital visits during the winter months.

Businesses in New Zealand have been ‘Nudged’ by Ardern to continue the use of the Traffic Light System by still mandating staff and customers even though government mandates are suspended, until needed for the next variant that lands on New Zealand’s shores.

The Global Shapers, puppets of Klaus Schwab are in most countries of the world, there are  thousands of them. The Global Shapers are ‘Nudging’ the world to eat less meat’, by encouraging restuarants to change their menu’s, to push plan based meat-fake meat onto their customers.

The ‘Fast Food Company’ state they may well be ‘Nudged’ towards more plant based options- fake meat. The simple theory of behavioural economics could convince humans to eat less meat .

Ardern is ‘Nudging the citizens of New Zealand aiming for Zero Carbons 2030.

When being ‘Nudged’ give a shove and push back ‘get rid of the traffic light system’  Learn to recognize the ‘Nudges’. The solution involves.. When you realize you are being ‘Nudged” … Shove and  Push back.

 

PLEASE GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE, CLICK ON THE ARROW WITHIN THE IMAGE WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO MY VIDEO  WITH FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT.

 

NOTE: PLEASE SIGN UP ON WAKEUP NZ WEBSITE IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO ALREADY.  Thank you – Carol Sakey

 

...

UN & UN MEMBER NATION LEADERS PROMOTE FEMALES, MALES NO LONGER EXIST

THE UN AND GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE INTENSIFYING AND EXPANDING THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SPEECHES AND ON NEWSMEDIA AS TO THE  DEMOSTIC VIOLENCE BY MEN AGAINST WOMEN.

One school in NZ gave girls self defence classes and boys anger management. The message males are the abuses and females must defend themselves against males. All men are abuses.

The UN is all about support, education, caring, respecting Girls and Women. It appears that men have been rubbed on the chalked blackboard like they no longer exist, only as predators.

Whether its males abuse females more that females abuse males this does not equate putting all men under the one label of being predators, abusers of women. Domestic Violence does happen against men and its not unfamiliar but is familiar as not being publicised or reported in the mainstream media, the propaganda machine.

What is domestic violence against men? Its when some uses violence, controlling techniques to gain power over a male or female. Yes it happens to males. Eg a wife, partner abuses their male partner, husband

Men and women applies to both, the same scenario. Whether a same sex relationship or not, or any culture or religious group. Abuse relationships can happen between parents and children, grown children abusing parents, elder abuse, brother and sisters abusing each other

There are many different types of domestic violence, including physical assault, punching, slapping, hitting, scratching, bullying, emotional and psychological abuse including yelling, put downs, being ignored.

This may include social isolation, not being able to see family, friends, loved ones. And domineering behaviour- behaviour that frightens, harms, controls a person – man, women a child.

What are the signs that you may be experiencing domestic violence?

There are many different types of domestic violence, including:

Domestic Violence is mostly always discussed in relation to women. Man always regarded a s the perpetrator. Domestic Abuse is not limited to women alone. Men are most definitely abused verbally, physically, emotionally, psychologically, sexually. Men are what I call the ‘Silent Victims’. The law favours women as victims of violence, this is unjustly and is biased and discriminating.

Referencing:-January 2019 a Joint Submission for Men in NZ for the Universal Periodic Review of NZ (UPR Working Groups 32nd Session) Supporting Org., Canterbury Mens Centre, The Male Room, Wake Up NZ, Black Ribbon NZ, Mens and Boys Human Rights NZ. This important submission included:-That NZ has committed to full equality between men and women, however in some area’s men are disadvantages, men’s human rights are not protected  Men lack equality before the Law. Men face de facto inequalities compared to women.

Men are disadvantages by substantive differences in the justice system, in education, health, support for victims of violence and in family issues. There are system issues preventing NZ from addressing these human rights issues. Formal mechanisms to ensure gender equality, there is overwhelming evidence that concentrates on women’s inequalities. Ignoring the serious plight of men

NZ has at least three laws which explicitly discriminate against men and boys.  That violates the basic human rights of equality under the law and freedom from discrimination. “ensuring formal equality requires eliminating all instances of de jure discrimination”

In 1996 Female Genital mutilation became illegal in NZ however there is no protection for males.. While discussing intersex children, the committee on the Rights of the Child recommended “that no-one is subjected to unnecessary medical or surgical treatment during infancy or childhood”

Thus guaranteeing the Rights Of Children to bodily Integrity – autonomy and self-determination. Thus this should apply to all boys and girls.  NZ has accepted recommendations to remedy structural discrimination in the Justice System, however men face unequal treatment in the Justice System. Women who enter the Justice System are filtered out at every natural attrition point more than men.

Dr Samantha Jeffries found several disparities in the treatment of men compared to women  “In all but one case (the initial decision to imprison) -sex was found to have a direct impact on the judicial outcomes investigated including:- Length of prison tern, remand status, length of custodial, remand and bail conditions. Women’s imprisonment terms were found to be substantially shorter than men’s.  She also stated that she found judges and probation offices were more likely to talk about women in terms of their ‘superior’ nurturing capabilities, as weak willed, dependent on ‘bad’ men who had lead them astray, as mentally ‘unwell’ and /or as victims of  circumstance.

That the court was more likely to construed male offenders as bad, disruptive and dangerous.  This allowed the court to rationalise rehab over punishment for women.

There were other biases and discriminations by the justice system against men made in this report and no effort has been made to address, adjust these. Therefore NZ Judicial System, the Government should eliminate gender biases against men, males in general within the justice system.

NZ accepted recommendations to reduce inequalities in the education system however boys and men are behind at all levels of education. Dropping out, suspensions and expulsions:- Equal numbers of men and women reported being a victim of violent crime. Men reported less victimisation than women from family and partners and more from non-family members and strangers

4.The rate of death from assault for men is 1.6 times that of women

Men are unequally treated when it comes to services available to them purely because of their gender. Whether females or males are perpetrated both should be given the same relevant support. One police officer is reported as saying “I’m also seeing and I agree … that males are becoming expendable and it’s as if we don’t matter anymore.”

Much work needs to be done when it comes to health equalities, as NZ Health Strategy does not inclusively include men”( ‘gendered’ health strategy in New Zealand is not inclusive of men.” Traditionally men have a higher Mortality rate than women.  Many more men, young males suicide than females in NZ.

We have a horrific suicide history and its getting worse. Men suicide rate is three times higher than that of females. Men and fathers are very important members of families.

There is little to no recognition of mens reproduction rights, this is complicated because men do not bear the children but they should not be excluded without the male, father of the child’s sperm their would be no child in the first place.

Yes men become overjoyed, elated, look forward to the birth of their child, imagine if the unborn child’s mother then decides to terminate this unborn child that the father has already fallen in love with, is looking forward to holding in his arms, to show his little one of to the world his family. But that can be ripped away from him just like that, by a mother of his child deciding she doesn’t want the unborn baby right up to the time the unborn baby is in the mother birth canal.

Big Boys do cry, and they do hurt and they do suffer from family violence and they are discriminated against and treated unjustifiably discriminated against.

NZ Family Court System has significant problems. 21st September 2017 Zdenek Hanzlik died of injuries outside parliament. He was protesting issues with the family court,  He died of self immolation. Sacrificed himself by fire, set himself alight, burned to death

Another system that needs to be held totally responsible and accountable is Oranga Tamariki’s UPLIFTS’ and the systems that permit them. Report dated 23rd August 2019. The Equal Justice Project. Referring to a Newsroom report of ‘stolen generations’ Where thousands of children have been taken or lost “were stolen” Investigations into abuse in state care in 2019 found that more than 220 children were being harmed in 2018. 36 were sexually harmed, 182 physically harmed, 35 neglected and 83 emotionally abused by caregivers, family members, other Oranga Tamariki staff. When asked about these findings in March 2019 the ministry’s chief executive Grainne Moss failed to provide more detail about the number of Oranga Tamariki staff involved.

Figures obtained under the Official Information’s Act showed that in July – Sept 2018 there were three instances where Oranga Tamariki Staff were found to have physically harmed a child in care. There were three instances of physical harm in Oct-Dec quarter. In addition there was one instance of emotional harm and another instance of sexual harm caused by an Oranga Tamariki staff member, Oranga Tamariki refused to release details in its OIA response about what action was taken, if any, against staff members.

References to Oranga Tamariki namely ‘engenders a legacy of harm’ removal of children from their parents. Psychologically devastating.

The Guardian reportd 27th July 2019. An additional 18,000 children pushed into poverty In just one year) A study shows homelessness, food insecurity down to government neglect. Many children still living in damp conditions, more children than ever living in motels, families living in unaffordable homes. Public housing waiting list booms.

Ardern publicly declares “it would be difficult to find a government from the past several decades that had dome more to address child poverty than the current one. Ardern’s self praise. She says she is really prod of her government.  Government policies that failed to ensure adequate income support for hundreds of thousands of children.

The government doled out $13bn in wage subsidies to people whose jobs were affected by the lockdown and ongoing disruptions, but many people in lower-socioeconomic positions missed out, report author and Public Health Association chief executive, Leah Bain, said.

The complete failure of this government. Kiwi Build complete failure. Now the govt publicises, boasts all these houses are being built. High density housing, dog kennels without gardens.  Wait for it Red Traffic Light confined to your dog kennels of high density pack and stacks. Under constant surveillance.

Yep, that will really push family violence, anxiety, stress limits housed in little boxes with little or no gardens for children and no pets to cuddle.

Public Housing Waiting List 26,868 applicants as at March 31st 2022. An increase of 13.4% increase from the same time as last year. Now the NZ Govt invites 165,000 new residency visa’s by July 2022, even though there is a huge loss of employment and businesses that have seriously impacted on New Zealanders lives. The insanity persists.

NOTE PLEASE GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE CLICK ON THE ARROW TO MY VIDEO

 

 

...