DESCRIPTION OF ALGORITHM BIAS. Data in Data out, Rubbish In and Rubbish out, Corruption in and Corruption Out . And NZ willingly commits climate fraud.

Algorithm Bias is described as systematic and repeatable errors in a computer system that creates unfair outcomes, eg privileging one category over another. Algorithms can be simplistic or complex. They are tiny pieces of invisible code that perform calculations that power machine learning. There are many types of bias for example  sample bias, prejudice bias, measurement bias and exclusion bias.  Algorithm bias are caused by the people that create them, that write algorithms those that choose the data used for the algorithms, they choose how to apply them as to the results required of the algorithms. Its easy for people to determine conscious biases which automatically perpetrate the end result required, for whatever purpose needed. For example- information bias, selective bias which equate to the distortion of research. Biases affect decision making, policy making may be – survivorship bias, confirmation bias, framing bias, group think bias.

There are of course other biases such as – Invisibility, stereotyping, imbalance, selectivity, non-reality, fragmentation, isolation, linguistic, cosmetic all are namely biases. A Linear Algorithm has the highest bias. Linear Regression an to error that is introduced by approximity of a real live problem which maybe complicated. Linear models can introduce bias, make output easier to understand.

What about Climate Model Bias:- Errors in climate modelling is caused by a range of factors for example- spatial resolution (large grid sizes), simplified thermodynamic processes and physics or incomplete understanding of the global universal system. Limitations of climate models as predictions of climate is incomplete, the climate systems imperfect ability to transform knowledge into accurate mathematical equation. Climate models inability to reproduce important atmospheric phenomenon. That natural variability is still the dominant uncertainty in predictions. Uncertainty in Climate projections, predictions ,

Are they taking into account volcanoes, even dormant ones gives off gasses, what about El Nino and the North Atlantic Oscillation? Climate models are imperfect tools, control mechanisms, used for the purpose of social & behavioral re-engineering. To replace the global economy, to de-growth to promote tribal feudalism. To take us back to the dark ages.  Climate simulations differ from reality. Simulated clouds, surface atmosphere and representations of soil & vegetation in climate simulations models are to small. Climate models predicting our future,  determining our lives for us. Plundering New Zealand, plundering, destroying the livelihoods of farmers worldwide.

The complex nature of the climate system is too difficult to determine the exact impacts that change will be at different locations at different times.  Uncertainty increases the level of fear- climate doom and gloom. Rising seas, the scorches earth.  Equates to uncertainty, biased algorithms consequently data in-data out and rubbish and rubbish out. .No-one can be certain of the natural climate ability but the climate scientists know for certain what algorithm biases they are using. Question- who is creating the invisible tiny codes that make up for Algorithms and for what purpose will they use the end result for-..who benefits. Who are the winners and the losers.

Its not possible to determine the future by emission. Carbon offsets are a scammers dream and is largely a sham, a massive fraud.  On the 23^rd March 2022,The Guardian on Australia’s carbon credit scheme reported is largely a scam  says whistleblower. Professor Andrew McIntosh said the system gives credits for projects such as regrowing native forests after clearing, is a fraud on the environment, taxpayers and consumers. Prof Andrew McIntosh is an Environmental Law and Policy expert a former head of the Governments Emission Reduction Assurance Committee. He launched an extraordinary attack on the scheme, saying the govt had wasted $1 billion in tax payer funding.

3/5/2016 Multi-billion Euro Carbon Trading Fraud Trial Opens in Paris , this was called the heist of the century.

The SpinOff News ‘Dodgy deals with Climate Fraudster-NZ’s role in the junk carbon scam. Alongside Russia and Ukraine, NZ is complicit in a carbon swindle, and NZ’s reputation is at risk, write Geoff Simmons. 18^th April 2016. NZ was willing and able to participate in a wholesale climate fraud. The short story is that Ukraine and Russia found loopholes in the International rules for carbon trading. The loopholes allowed them to create millions of carbon credits that had no environmental benefit whatsoever- they were simply fraudulent. Other countries cottoned on, stopped dealing with Russia and Ukraine Incredibly New Zealand ended up being the largest customer of these climate criminals because our government was the only one that accepted their dodgy wares. The scam used was claiming for carbon credits for projects that had already happened.

Examples -after the Soviet Union downfall Ukraine was left with large rock piles that still contained coal. Occasionally these piles caught fire, releasing carbon emissions. In 2012 the Ukraine started claiming carbon credits on the basis that they would remove the coal from the piles and put out fires. Trouble was they already removed the coal four years earlier, they even lied about how much coal was involved. In 2012 Europe and NZ got increasingly suspicious of what the Ukraine & Russia were up to. NZ made noises about banning these dodgy credits in April 2012, the minister then was Tim Grosser, he claimed “there is serious danger of NZ essentially exporting capital for no good reason”

Backroom negotiations took place with their coalition partner ACT CHANGED THEIR MIND. July 2012 they left our Emissions Trading Scheme open to dodgy credits, claiming that our scheme should reflect the ‘international price”. By the beginning 0f 2013 Europe had banned the trade in these dodgy credits, leaving New Zealand as the only willing buyer. One must question “How was it as NZ Govt stated “the international price”?

The International Price of fraudulent and environmentally worthless carbon credits. At one point falling as low as 15 cents per tonne. The price of carbon credits in 2011 was around $20 per tonne. That price was a sufficient  incentive to plant trees so back in 2011 NZ had no need to purchase International units to cover our emissions. When the price of carbon crashed, nobody bothered to plant tree’s, everyone bought the dodgy carbon credits instead. NZs emissions soared. Meanwhile polluters profited and ordinary Kiwi’s got ripped off. The details are in the report.

NZ rapidly became the largest consumer of these fraudulent foreign credits. Over a quarter of all  NZ emissions between 2008-2002 ended up being covered by dodgy carbon credits. 99% of NZ emission reduction units came from Russia and the Ukraine.  In  2015 a review by the Stockholm Environmental Institute found that 89% of Ukrainian projects were of questionable or low environmental integrity, as dodgy as hell. NZ tax payers ended up with the govt sending around $200million of their good money to these crims. The opinion in many circles that NZ Govt was knowingly an accomplice in this climate crime.  Stuff NZ reported August 16^th 2016 ‘Companies revealed over dodgy carbon credits’. Some of NZ’s biggest businesses including BP, Z Energy, NZ Steel and Fonterra were named by the Morgan Foundation as buying dodgy carbon credits.  

A number of forestry companies were also identified as having purchased fraudulent carbon credits from Ukraine and Russia these include NZ Forest Leasing, Matariki Forests, Ngai Tahu Forest Estates and China Forestry Group.

James Shaw Greens co leaders said the govt should trade good carbon credits for bad ones to ensure the integrity of NZ’s global commitment to cut climate pollution.  The Morgan Foundation said the govt had stockpiled about 85-90 million units which would see the country through to 2020, but many of the units were fraudulent. Associate professor Euan Mason of the school of forestry University of Canterbury said “Our govt knew the imported credits were fraudulent. They knew that their policies allowed companies to act immorally, that many companies did act immorally.

NZ Herald also reported on 17^th April 2016 that NZ’s Carbon Credits Scheme A Farce’. NZ accused of cheating to fulfil its International Climate Change obligations. The Emissions Trading Scheme allows polluters to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by buying carbon credits from companies such as the forestry industry. Polluters were able to buy carbon credits from other countries which had signed up to the Kyoto Agreement,. NZ was far the largest purchaser of Russian and Ukrainian carbon credits through NZ Emission Trading Scheme. This was a National led govt at the time

NBR Report Paul Bennet dismissed the Morgan Foundations recently released ‘Climate Cheats’ reports which highlighted the NZ companies that had bought carbon credits from Russia and Ukraine. The minister said the Morgan Foundation “Offered nothing new” It was accepted that the Stockholm Report had pulled the plug. All political parties behind the closed doors of Wellington knew the fraudulent carbon credit scam was happening.

NZ Geographic reported “Credit where none is due’ 12 companies profited from pollution using fake carbon credits from Russia. A Reports that back in the 1990’s NZ government assured that the country would trade (and plant) our way out of climate change. In 2002 Labor Govt announced the Emission Trading Scheme. The carrot being that businesses that reduce their emissions could sell their unused units. Those that had exceeded their allocated carbon credit would have to buy more.  Thanks to hot air the Emission Trading Scheme has removed NOT ONE GRAM of  greenhouse gas from the atmosphere.

The Government highly aware that hot air was killing its own ETS, however  the govt continued to flood the market, giving its own units to businesses for free. Fraudulent Carbon credits. In 2016 140 million emission units- 5years worth of activity remained still out there in 2020, doing absolutely nothing to avert climate change.

Where are they now? Its was said back them “when the price is right, they’ll  cash up their free credits whilst paying for their pollution. “Profiting from pollution”. As always the taxpayer picks up the climate doom and gloom tab. Come on people do you really believe in this climate doom and gloom bullcrap.  And here the govt is carbon tax on commercial and domestic rates, energy etc., And throwing the farmers under their own tractors, using them as the govts whipping boy.

Climate Change Bias’s are many. Data in and Data out. Rubbish in and Rubbish Out. Corruption in and Corruption Out. Tax payer money in and tax payer money out. We have become a disposable society. The NZ Govt plundering NZ.

CLICK ON THE IMAGE OF CHICKEN LITTLE TO LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO

https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/credit-where-none-is-due/

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/new-zealands-carbon-credits-scheme-a-farce-says-morgan-foundation-report/3TPOX7WZFKM4TVYLCTBTIINTBA

https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/18-04-2016/dodgy-deals-with-climate-fraudsters-nzs-role-in-the-junk-carbon-scam

https://www.france24.com/en/20160503-france-trial-multi-billion-carbon-emissions-trading-fraud-opens-paris

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/23/australias-carbon-credit-scheme-largely-a-sham-says-whistleblower-who-tried-to-rein-it-in

Family First NZ has  published an online analysis of NZ Schools Relationship Sexuality Education Guideline 2021 (link provided). Aimed at parents/caregivers as to the overall welfare of children in NZ. Raising awareness as to knowing what is happening within the NZ School curriculum

Family First NZ promotes, advances research & policy regarding family and marriage. Participates in social analysis & debate surrounding issues relating to and affecting families. Educating the public in their understanding of the institutional, legal and moral framework that makes a just and democratic society possible.

Produces, publishes relevant & stimulating material in newspapers, magazines and other media relating to family issues, speaks up about issues relating to families that are in the public domain.

Family First publication as to Relationship Sexuality taught in the NZ School Curriculum covers, includes Parents/Caregivers concerns as to Relationship Sexuality teaching in the school curriculum-

The problem of the schools implementing controversial and divisive policies. The indoctrination and politicisation . The delivering of sexuality programmes to children from the age of 5ys and above.

For Relationship Sexuality programs to be taught in all classes within the school curriculum, Art, Science, Technology, English etc.,  To embody, reinforce these RSE teachings to capture young minds. Aiming to create a more inclusive school environment, portrayed as scientific however how no basis for science.

Where  misinformation surrounding gender and sex being pervasive guidelines risk children being ideologically indoctrinated within the school confines. So you believe sexualization should be taught to children as young as 5-6 yrs old.?

Should 7yr olds be taught about gender and sex, that a child sex is assigned at birth instead of biologically at the time of conception.  That there are a multitude of genders, just pick one.?

The one the child picks will be listed with their identity on the school role with a pronoun of their choice. What happens at school can stay at school if the child wishes. The teacher may choose this to be.

2. Children are not learning the biological, scientific truth. Topics addressed transgender and changing rooms, toilets. Sports team participation, sports teams irrespective of sex.

Its extremely important that parents/ caregivers fully understand and are knowledgeable about what their children are being taught at school. Every school should have a ‘First Do No Harm Policy’

Family First NZ give reasons to be concern about the RSE teaching in the school curriculum for example, children as young as 5 & 6yrs old being taught sexual reproduction, to recognise body parts, genitals and name them in Te reo Maori and English, to understand the basic concepts about reproduction

I personally believe children of this age are still living in the magic world of imaginings. Its innocence why plant this sexuality teaching into young minds and rob them of these young imaginings, like tooth fairies etc.,

Children should be given the opportunity to grow each at their  own pace, to their maturity and brain development. Between the ages of 5-6yrs old typically children should be able to draw, shapes, faces, print their names, copy letters, draw straight and curved lines, numbers, copying and tracing.

By the time they are seven should be able to write sentences, little stories with upper case and lower case letters, punctuation. Interesting little stories and funny little poems. These are my personal thoughts when I think about what children should be learning in the educations system between 5-7yrs of age. Not sexual reproduction naming genitals and sexual reproduction.

However now its 7 and 8 yr olds being taught to identify gender stereotypes, diverse gender and sexual identities in society. To write ‘assigned at birth’ “All babies are assigned their sex at birth, usually determined  by visual observation olf external genitalia”. Teaching children there are multiple genders. Thus  labelling “the assumption that there are only two genders (girl/boy.. man/woman as being “incorrect”. Hence not based on biology or science but a big fat lie.

Like all babies assigned a sex at birth (their biological characteristics) Never mind sex is also identifiable through DNA. Determined at the time of conception. What about the privacy, sexual abuse risks around that? We are talking about children here. Should they be exposed to opposite sexes in the same very personal private places. I personally do not believe that is safe, its highly risky and amounts to child abuse committed by the state.  Should young people in the school environment be learning about hormone blockers. ?. This teaching of hormone blockers in schools in England has been banned because of  very risky, harmful consequences.

Your child attending a Technology class will learn how to identify how gender expectations are embedded in technology, the  design and style of power tools and other tools “explore symbols linked to gay and transgender rights movements”. Arts, your child will “consider plays with roles that do not conform to gender stereotypes.” In Social Sciences, your child will be encouraged to explore the development and persistence of gender stereotypes (for example, by researching the #MeToo movement).”

The RSE guidelines teach young people that Male-Female/Man-Women and Boy-Girl  are labelled incorrect. An incorrect assumption, guidelines state that students must identify gender stereotypes. There are now hundreds of genders waiting to be discovered. Should five year olds be speaking about same sex marriage in the school classroom. Should schools promote hormone blockers that can weaken bones causing bone mineralization and infertility, at puberty hormone blockers can have long term effects on the brains development.

Implications of RSE teaching in schools  “children will be socialised to believe the confusion about gender, that they may be stuck in the wrong gender. Hence dangerous to their emotional mental health and well being because of the state of confusion. Risks leading to young people taking puberty blockers.

Under the new guidelines: Science classes will teach your children to: 21

SCIENCE:

• “…consider how biological sex has been constructed and measured over time…” . + Years 1-8_ Years 9-13 _
• “…consider variations in puberty, including the role of hormone blockers.” . Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _

4.• “…explore the role of genetics in constructing debates about gender and sexuality.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13

• “…explore what ‘male’ and ‘female’ mean in relation to various living things, for example, plants, sea creatures, and fungi.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13
• “…explore what ‘male’, female, and ‘hermaphrodite’ mean in relation to plants and animals.” Years 9-13

There is no scientific justification for this teaching in a science class.

TECHNOLOGY Classes will teach your children to:-

• “…explore symbols linked to the gay and transgender rights movements.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…identify how gender expectations are embedded in technology, for example, in the design of power tools and other tools…” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…explore the way toys, apps, and online games and activities are designed for a gendered audience.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…engage in a gender-neutral design challenge.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…interrogate the design and sustainability of contraceptives.” Years 9-13 _

There is no justification in children exploring symbols linked to gay and transgender rights movements in a Technology class.

ARTS your child will learn to:-

• “…consider plays with roles that do not conform to gender stereotypes.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…explore the representation of gender in visual art.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…explore dances and dance styles where there are specific roles for gender and also those where there is no gender differentiation.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _ • “…identify ways that colour and language are related to gender and sexual orientation.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _

Children learn how to embody gender fluidity into Art. There is no justification for this.

SOCIAL SCIENCES: children encouraged to:-

• explore the “…development and persistence of gender stereotypes (for example, by researching the #MeToo movement)”. + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _

5. • “…consider famous ‘rainbow’ figures from history.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _

• “…explore geographical spaces in the school and community in terms of how they relate to gender (for example, are spaces designed according to gender? Who plays on which areas of the playground and why?).” + Years 1-8

_ • “…explore the history of rainbow movements and gay rights in Aotearoa New Zealand, for example, law changes over time to address issues from the death penalty to marriage equality.” Years 9-13 _

• “…describe the way the media reports on different leadership styles in relation to gender and/or sexual orientation.” Years 9-13 _

Why on earth should children of primary school age need to research  The ME Too Movement- given the sensitive nature of the crimes alleged.

LANGUAGES your child will learn to:-

• “…investigate the different words and their meanings used by indigenous peoples in their languages to depict different kinds of relationships or sexual orientations in accordance with their world views.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13 _
• “…analyse the use of language in earlier and current media and/or public discussions of sex and gender, highlighting changes and developments in language use.” Years 9-13 _

ENGLISH The guidelines want your child to learn to:-

• “…engage in dialogue and debate in the context of provocative online posts linked to relationships, gender, and sexuality.” + Years 1-8 _
• “…identify positive and negative gender bias in media stories.” + Years 1-8 _ Years 9-13

_ • “…create texts (oral, written, or visual) to convey ideas about gender and sexuality.” Years 9-13 _

RSE Guidelines explicitly state, create an environment through school policies, practices, culture, leadership that shapes the attitudes, behaviours of young people.

The  embodiment of the sexualising, politicising capturing young minds  projects what is learned in the confines of the school environment in the outside world. Risking the fragmentation within the family unit, with friends and relatives, loved ones. Hence drawing an individual into isolation because of confusion. Parents/Caregivers I urge you to encourage open dialogue about gender and sexuality teaching within the school curriculum, with the school and the broader community

School rolls and records reflect the child’s chosen gender identity and pronouns;  Gender neutral uniforms, categorising uniforms by gender or sex is purposely being avoided. What may be seen at face value is harmless may not be entirely harmless and may be causing your child harm. Relationship Sexuality teaching in the school curriculum I believe is unjustifiable. Is child abusive. Children risk peer pressure to be com pliant and to conform. Children may feel rejection and seek isolation. Indoctrination and overexposure.

.When subjected to prolonged, continual exposure to false information it leads people to believe the misinformation presented is actually true. This is called ‘ illusory truth effect’. Where a preference for misinformation is adopted because it feels familiar. Leaves a person to believe a lie is the truth. Then this is shared and grows amongst the group, or population, the children in the school environment. Repeated statements are easier to process and perceived to be more truthful. A big problem in the school environment by indoctrinating children into the Relationship Sexualisation Education programmes.

 It all comes down to parents rights. Its very important and I urge parents/ caregivers, community member to seek out Family First NZ. There is heaps of very useful informative information. What you as caregiver/parents can do. And what is being taught in the school curriculum that risks harming your child’s health and overall welfare.

Check what your children are learning at school. Check to see if they have a ‘First Do No Harm Policy’. Liaise with School Board Trustee’s.

Closely monitor classroom content, material what the school is covering in their classes, homework/assignments etc.,  If all fails withdraw your child from class.

Family First NZ covers a wealth of constructive ideas for parents/caregivers and work with schools in a respective manner to foster genuine truth and compassion

LINK:  https://familyfirst.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ANALYSIS-Relationship-Sexuality-Education-Guidelines-2021.pdf

CLICK ON LINK IN IMAGE FOR RUMBLE OVERVIEW

QUESTION: Were public sector agencies aware of the threat posed by white supremacists and other right wing extremist non-state actors and movements? Is so what did they do in response to the threat?

ANSWERS: The primary focus of intelligence was international terrorism, particularly the threat to New Zealanders overseas. Assessment on international terrorism was primarily focused on Islamic Extremist Terrorism.  In the past 5 years leading up to 2018 there were few strategic assessments about terrorism threats in New Zealand and practically none on threats other than Islamic Terrorism

As to Right Wing extremism before the March 2019 by reporting that the NZ SIS reported that there was an awareness of a threat posed by right wing was developing but it was limited.  NZ SIS started its baselining project in May 2018. Following a meeting in December 2018 NZ Police took preliminary steps to undertake their own exercises on the extreme right In response the NZ SIS and NZ Police conducted a tabletop computer counter-terrorism response exercise in October 2018 based on a scenario of an assumed motor vehicle attack on worshipper out Masjid an Nur Mosque.

NOTE: this was around the opposition to free speech and the signing of the UN Global Compact of Migration signed in Dec 2018). I and other noticed the public advancement of political policing by NZ Police. In late 2018 NZ Police Armed defenders shutting off a street, emerging on the home of Lee Williams asking him if he supported Trump.  Another visit to a conservative supporter – NZ police questioning did he know a conservative candidate.  Police camera’s in the faces of those that supported freedom of speech, civil liberties, human rights being targeted. (This is when the mainstream propaganda machine started really targeting what they called those who opposed their human rights being violated)

QUESTION: WHAT INTELLLIGENCE DID AGENCIES RECEIVE FROM FIVE EYES PARTNERS REGARDING WHITE SUPREMACY AND RIGHT WING EXTREMISM BEFORE 15^TH MARCH 2019?

ANSWERS:  Very little international partner reporting related to right wing extremism. For example the 2^nd quarter of the 2018-2019 financial year, the Govt Communications Security Bureau received 7,526 intelligence reports from International Partners about Terrorism and Violent Extremism none were related to Right Wing Extremism

QUESTION: GIVEN THE UPWARD TREND IN WHITE SUPREMACIST AND OTHER RIGHT WING EXTREMIST ACTS OF VIOLENCE (ACTUAL AND PREVENTED) IN THE DECADE PRIOR  TO MARCH 2019…WHY WAS THERE NO CONCERN OF THIS HAPPENING IN NZ UNTIL MID 2018?

ANSWER: Counter terrorism largely concentrated on the threat of Islamic Terrorism, Islamic extremism being seen as the presenting threat

 QUESTION: WAS THERE ANY ASSESSMENTS DONE REGARDING DANGER TO MUSLIM COMMUNITIES? IF SO- WHAT WAS THE RESULT?

ANSWERS: Strategic and tactical intelligence assessments primarily focus on the threat posed and who poses the threat rather than risk to particular communities. Intelligence assessment can relate specifically to the risk to events or locations. There has been only one NZ Police Intelligence Assessment before 17^th March 2019 which refers to the risk to Muslim communities. There was one NZ Police Intelligence Assessment produced prior to March 2019, referring to the risk to Muslim Communities. May 2018 a National Security Situation Update Report

Namely, ‘Ramadan 2018’ which provided the NZ Police Assistant Commissions and District Commanders that Da’ish had issued calls for terrorist attacks against Ramadan for the previous three years, and could again. It advised that Ramadan was also a time of increased risk to the Muslim Community and was noted by the NZ Police Commissioners and District Commanders.

2.Daesh is a name used to refer to ISIS/ISIL. The radical Sunni Muslim Organization, it’s a name said to delegitimise the groups claim to be an Islamic State. ISIL or Daish refers to the fundamentalist organization of the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. Tarrant had no criminal history in New Zealand or Australia before 15^th March 2019. The residents in his hometown in Australia said he seemed relatively normal, had not drawn attention of the Intelligence community. In his hometown the community were shocked at what eventuated on 15^th March 2019. The Gym Manager in his home town said that Tarrant may have been radicalized in his visit to Europe and Asia in 2010 but still could not believe that he had done these horrific acts of terrorism.

Tarrant travelled to Turkey multiple times, with extended periods of time spent in Turkey He travelled to Bulgaria, Romania, Hungry, Serbia, Montenegro. Northern Pakistan. With Tarrant’s extended time, and multiple visits to Turkey  I found an article entitled Daish (ISIS0 They know no God, they have none. 1/10/2014. These ISIS groups were found in the Netherlands. Tarrant’s multiple trips and extended stays in Turkey not a lot has been reported about this? Honour killings are still prevalent in Turkey… Turkey is a secular country, Muslim, social democratic and also pro westerns- a real mix. Terrorism is Turkey is a significant issue for Turkish Authorities.

It has historically been advised to exercise extreme caution when travelling Turkey due to terrorism. Obviously Tarrant did not see any measurement of caution or concern otherwise he would not have visited Turkey multiple times, not made extended long visits to Turkey. In every city there is a call to prayer from Mosque speakers. But Tarrant obviously liked Turkey. Refers to Al-Sham. The term Al-Sham commonly used to describe the area between the Mediterranean ann Anatolia (In present day Turkey) and Egypt.

ISIS, ISIL, IS OR DAESH. One Group, many names. A self styled Islamic State. Daesh is an evil death cult, however governments worldwide would rather call the extremist Islamic  terrorist group Daesh instead of Isil.. With no mention of Tarrant’s many trips and extended stays in Turket Islamic Extremism is not mentioned or questioned.  The regular, frequent calling of prayer by loud speaker at Mosques throughout Turkey obviously did not stop him from visiting Turkey time and time again with extended stays. This is me thinking out loud. Something is not Oh So Right here. I have never seen any of Tarrants footage, and do not intend to, have no need to.  But remember God is our maker and the truth will eventually reveal itself. So many questions have gone unanswered. And cannot be answered because of the severe restriction on any person delving any deeper into the 15^th March 2019 event.

From late 2018 I noticed how freedom of speech was being violated and political policing and that severely, seriously advanced and 15^th March 2019 became Ardern’s govts applied reason to further advance destroying, seriously violating New Zealander’s Civil Liberties and Human Rights. I personally believe these actions by Ardern’s are totally unjustifiable.

The Muslim Community in NZ had experienced sporadic incidents of vandalism and abuse, however this is reported not to be frequent but caught the attention of the mainstream media. (Propaganda Machine). Yes well the rest of us experiences vandalism etc., before 2018 that’s not uncommon. Not a reason to blame NZrs that are simply opposing the Marxist/Socialist Regime.

QUESTION: WAS WHITE SUPREMACY AND RIGHT WING EXTREMISM INCLUDED IN THE CURRENT NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES AS AN AREA OF FOCUS FOR COUNTER TERRORISM?

ANSWERS: Not specifically. The Prime Ministers Cabinet in December 2018 included a terrorism priority, it included Domestic as well as International Terrorism threats but did not refer to particular ideologies. The Domestic Terrorism threats were described as those that may arise in and against New Zealand, or be carried out by New Zealanders overseas. And the scope included emerging trends and characteristics associated with overseas terrorist networks linked to NZ.

3.The International Terrorism threats were described as ‘threats against New Zealand’s interests overseas in areas which have the greatest exposure for New Zealanders, these being the trends, characteristics of emerging regional and global terrorism threats, that may impact on NZ. An ‘Unclassified version of the National Security and Intelligence Priorities was initially published in the department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 2019 Annual Report. In September 202 the Dept of the PM and Cabinet updated its website to include an unclassified version of the National Security & Intelligence Priorities which included:-‘Terrorism. Threats to New Zealand. New Zealanders and New Zealand’s interests from terrorism, ideologically, politically motivated violence at home and abroad’

The strategic assessment that informed the 2018 priorities did not mention white supremacy or right wing extremism. (Reported NZ SIS). The NZ SIS with the NZ Police and Dept of the PM and Cabinet are the owner of the terrorism risk profile in the National Risk Register which informed the development of the NZ SIS Priorities in 2018. Ardern and her Cabinet were involved in this 2018 assessment that did not mention white supremacy or right wing extremism

The Royal Commission Inquiry reported that : An extreme right wing lone actor attack in NZ remained a possibility, albeit a remote one. (From what I have researched of the Royal Commission Enquiry has produced that this is a remote one.) Yet Ardern and Macron are using 15^th March 2019  to obsessively promote Hate Speech Laws, a war on free speech globally. Ardern’s Govt produced the first Algorithm Charter in the world to seek out Hate Speech.

Although Govt preaches this is transparent another one of those litany of lies. Algorithm are complex tiny pieces of invisible codes that cannot  be visibly seen by you or me. Nothing transparent about Algorithms.

NOTE: After March 2019 NZ Police compiled a list of individuals who had the potential for right wing extremist characteristics from a review of their intelligence holdings. They had never ever attempted to do this prior to 15^th  March 2019. NZ Police reported to the Royal Commission of Inquiry that the accuracy and reliability of the information used to compile the list was variable and required further assessment,

The NZ SIS, NZ Customs Service and NZ Police after 15^th March 2019 went about refining and prioritising the agencies leads on right wing extremist individuals and groups in New Zealand. However the NZ Police website reports a number of Designated terrorist entities. Islamic Extremist Groups. Lists associated with Resolution 1373.

New Zealand currently has 22 non-UN listed entities designated in support of UN Security Council Resolution 1373. Non-UN listed entities have been designated by New Zealand since 10 February 2010. Cabinet refined the agreed process for proposed designations of non-UN listed entities in October 2010. This paper sets out the legal framework and process for terrorist designations under the TSA after October 2010 and explains the Prime Minister’s discretion in making terrorist designations. Cases or terrorist designation renewed in NZ right up to 28^th August 2022 include Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade,

Al-Shabab of Somalia, The Basque Fatherland, Harakat-ul-Jihag-a;-Islam. Bangladesh A Jihad Group, the Indian Mujahideen. The Military wing of Hezbollah, Islamic Resistance, Islamic State of Iraq and other Islamic Extremist groups. Which includes the New Peoples Army/Communist Party of The Philippines., The shining Path- the Peruvian Communist Party. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad .and many more  And of course 27^th August 2020 Tarrants name was entered.

4.NOTE: A designated entity or a third party with an interest in the designation can apply to the Prime Minister (Ardern) for revocation of the designation. The Prime Ministers Executive Wing.

The information I have researched by legal means has found that Right Wing Extremism and White Supremacy was not a reported, nor an issue of NZ SIS or NZ Police prior to 15^th March 2019.

Yet Ardern and her political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington are obsessively intent to shut down and take extreme control of any speech that opposes a Socialist Marxist narrative which she and her political cronies worship and embrace.

NOTE: MARXISM/SOCIALISM THRIVES ON CRISIS EVENTS. Look at history, history repeating itself

NOTE: THIS RESEARCH HAS BEEN DONE THROUGH LEGAL MEANS HAS NOT VIOLATED GOVT CONFIDENTIALITY     WakeUpNew Zealand.  Carol Sakey

LINKS : https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/part-8-assessing-the-counter-terrorism-effort/questions-asked-by-the-community-3/

https://www.police.govt.nz/advice/personal-community/counterterrorism/designated-entities/lists-associated-with-resolution-1373

RO VIEW THE VIDEO VERSION OF THE INFORMATION I HAVE PROVIDED PLEASE CLICK THE LINK WITHIN THE IMAGE ABOVE

FIRST DO NO HARM  has been deliberately annihilated in New Zealand under Ardern’s regime. The Government of NZ has failed to protect New Zealanders and particularly the most vulnerable. Ardern and her mate Daniel Andrews are playmates on the same playing field.  I urge you never to forget the vunerable unborn and born lives of human being that have died in New Zealand because of the Ardern led regime.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO MY VIDEO ON THIS BLOG