SPEECH BY MAORI AFFAIRS MINISTER:   PAREKURA HOROMIA:- TO THE HOUSE (Parliament)

SPEECH IS AS FOLLOWS:-

The Mâori Party is full of hollow talk over the government’s decision not to support the UN Declaration Of The Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), says Mâori Affairs Minister Parekura Horomia.

Contrary to a number of misleading claims by the party’s co-leaders today, the New Zealand government did not vote against a move at the United Nations to outlaw discrimination against indigenous peoples.   Nor does the government accept Tariana Turia’s ridiculous claim that this government believes indigenous people are “ sub-human with only sub-human rights” – which I, and no doubt my Mâori caucus colleagues, frankly find offensive.”

The declaration adopted in the UN yesterday is in effect a wish list which fails to bind states to any of its provisions, Mr Horomia said.  “This means it is toothless. I’m actually more than a little surprised the Mâori Party is prepared to back something which effectively offers indigenous peoples no more than aspirational statements.”

Our government has worked extremely hard over a number of years to help forge a declaration which protects and promotes the rights of indigenous peoples in a meaningful way – and which states could actually implement, Mr Horomia said.

“The declaration adopted does neither and while we are proud of our efforts, we are deeply disappointed with the final result which we could not support.  “There are four provisions we have problems with, which make the declaration fundamentally incompatible with New Zealand’s constitutional and legal arrangements and established Treaty settlement policy.”

Article 26 of the Declaration states that indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. For New Zealand this covers potentially the entire country.   “It appears to require recognition of rights to lands now lawfully owned by other citizens, both indigenous and non-indigenous. This ignores contemporary reality and would be impossible to implement,” Mr Horomia said.

“The declaration also implies that indigenous people should have a right of veto over parliamentary law-making.”  The government strongly supports the full and active engagement of indigenous people in democratic decision-making processes. But these articles imply different classes of citizenship, where indigenous peoples have veto rights not held by others, Mr Horomia said.

“Indigenous rights in New Zealand are of profound importance.  The Treaty of Waitangi is the founding document of this country and we have an unparalleled system for redress. Nearly 40 per cent of New Zealand fishing quota is owned by Maori and claims to over half of the country’s land area have been settled.   “We also have some of the most extensive consultation mechanisms in the world, where the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, including the principle of informed consent, are enshrined in resource management law. “The Labour-led government is focused on pursuing goals which achieve real results for real people.

It’s about time the Mâori Party got its head out of the clouds and focused on achieving some real milestones, rather than pie-in-the-sky talk which won’t make a jot of difference in our peoples’ lives.”

I HAVE DISECTED THE MAIN POINTS OF HOROMIA’S PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH AS FOLLOWS:- Carol Sakey   https://wakeupnz.org

I HAVE DESECTED THIS SPEECH AND THESE ARE THE FOLLOWING POINTS:- (Carol Sakey)

The Mâori Party is full of hollow talk over the government’s decision not to support the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, says Mâori Affairs Minister Parekura Horomia.

Contrary to a number of misleading claims by the party’s co-leaders today, the New Zealand government did not vote against a move at the United Nations to outlaw discrimination against indigenous peoples.   “Nor does the government accept Tariana Turia’s ridiculous claim that this government believes indigenous people are “ sub-human with only sub-human rights” – which I, and no doubt my Mâori caucus colleagues, frankly find offensive.”

The declaration adopted in the UN yesterday is in effect a wish list which fails to bind states to any of its provisions, Mr Horomia said.  “This means it is toothless. I’m actually more than a little surprised the Mâori Party is prepared to back something which effectively offers indigenous peoples no more than aspirational statements.”

Our government has worked extremely hard over a number of years to help forge a declaration which protects and promotes the rights of indigenous peoples in a meaningful way – and which states could actually implement, Mr Horomia said.

“The declaration adopted does neither and while we are proud of our efforts, we are deeply disappointed with the final result which we could not support.  “There are four provisions we have problems with, which make the declaration fundamentally incompatible with New Zealand’s constitutional and legal arrangements and established Treaty settlement policy.”

Article 26 of the Declaration states that indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. For New Zealand this covers potentially the entire country.   “It appears to require recognition of rights to lands now lawfully owned by other citizens, both indigenous and non-indigenous. This ignores contemporary reality and would be impossible to implement,” Mr Horomia said.

“The declaration also implies that indigenous people should have a right of veto over parliamentary law-making.”  The government strongly supports the full and active engagement of indigenous people in democratic decision-making processes. But these articles imply different classes of citizenship, where indigenous peoples have veto rights not held by others, Mr Horomia said.

“Indigenous rights in New Zealand are of profound importance.  The Treaty of Waitangi is the founding document of this country and we have an unparalleled system for redress. Nearly 40 per cent of New Zealand fishing quota is owned by Maori and claims to over half of the country’s land area have been settled.   “We also have some of the most extensive consultation mechanisms in the world, where the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, including the principle of informed consent, are enshrined in resource management law. “The Labour-led government is focused on pursuing goals which achieve real results for real people.

It’s about time the Mâori Party got its head out of the clouds and focused on achieving some real milestones, rather than pie-in-the-sky talk which won’t make a jot of difference in our peoples’ lives.”

I HAVE ALSO NOTED FROM HOROMIA’S 2007 PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH IN PARLIAMENT:- Of course being a Labour MP he would applaud the Labour Party. Horomia was also a key player in planning, promoting the ‘Foreshore &Seabed Act.  He also mentioned in this speech that the NZ Government had helped develop the UN Declaration Rights of Indigenous Peoples during the past 20 plus years  with the United Nations (since 1990). Crown partnership Iwi.. was never documented within Treaty Of Waitangi 1840.

I HAVE ALSO NOTED SOME OF THE KEY WORDS USED IN HOROMIA’S PARLIAMENTRY SPEECH:-

• ‘INDIGENOUS’- We are, each one of us ‘Indigenous’. Indigenous is derived from the new Latin word ‘Indigenus’ and the old Latin word ‘Indigene’.   ‘Indu’ meaning-within, in and ‘Gignere’ meaning ‘BEGET’ which means To produce, give birth.
• ‘WHENUA (From the Maori Dictionary & Govt National Library).  ‘Whenua’ meaning :- Born of the land, Country, Nation,State, Ground, Terrirtorial Domain and Placenta-after birth
• ‘TANGATA’ meaning:- People, Men, Persons, Human beings, Individual, At home, Comfortable-Established, Adapted, Acclimatised, Local people, Hosts, Born of the land, Peoples whose ancestors lived here before. (Take your pick I am sure you will fit into one or more of these categories.

 NOTE:  Parekura  Horomia  Born 9th November 1950 –Died 29^th April 2013.   New Zealand Labour Party politician who served as Minister of Māori Affairs between 2000 and 2008.

Between 10 December 1999-26 July 2003; he was  the Associate Minister of Employment                                                                                                       Between 2000 and 2008 the  Minister Of Maori Affairs

Horomia had been told by another prominent Maori figure “You create your own shadow, and it will be a massive one.” Horomia  was born in Tolago Bay. He had seven brothers and sisters..

He started his working life as a manual labourer and then a Printer in the newspaper industry. Later he became involved in the Dept Of Labours East Coast schemes.

His hard work led him to be appointed to supervisory positions then he went from there to being the General Manager of the ‘Community Employment Group (1992)

In 2002 Dover Samuels was forced to step down as Minister Of Maori Affairs after criminal allegations we made against him.. Horomia was appointed in Dover Samuels place.

Samuels was later cleared of the allegations against him however it was decided Horomia would retain the Maori Affairs portfolio

Horomia was overweight for much of his life. He talked about his health battles and tried to lose weight many times. In 2004 he went on a public diet to encourage others to do the same.^[7] He died at his home on 29 April 2013 at the age of 62.^[

 Horomia was known by many to be a kind man with a good heart, who was not shy about speaking strong words in public or in the House (Parliament)

Thank you for allowing me to share this information with you.

Carol Sakey  https://wakeupnz.org

FACEBOOK- Carol Sakey and Group WakeUpNZ

The UN Global Rules Based Order urges women and girls to participate in front of a National-Global audience, ah well they obvoiusly believe they are the created on mandkind, however have only given womonkind the urgence, challenge to speak up and become empowered.  I really don’t need their permission because God gave me a voice to be used, to speak out about my inner voice. And they are NOT God, and certainly NOT my God. I have my God and do not believe in False Gods.

Ah well they want me as a woman to be empowered, be careful for what you wish for….This is my message to the UN and all its collaborators and Allies.

This my message as a Mother, Grandmother, Great Grandmother, Sister, Aunty, Cousin, Sister-Inlaw and Friend. Please listen to my ‘Self-Empowered Message to this ‘Global; Rules Based Order’. Afterall the UN has published, voiced, documentment that ALL Women and Girls are to be Empowered.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE (TOTALITARISM Utopia) ABOVE.     THIS WILL TAKE YOU TO MY VIDEO MESSAGE AS TO THE GLOBAL RULES BASED ORDER THAT EMPOWERS ME TO SPEAK OUT, TO HAVE A VOICE.

Murder, Torture, Imprisonment, Rape and highly descriminated against… this is the pandemic the mainstream media will never publish or report on.

The UN and this so called wonderful Utopia worldwide is a whopping lie, a fallacy.  Yet 193 UN Nation Governments fo along with this and promote the UN existence, therefore also promote the ugly godless world where people as slaughtered for their faith.

Researched reports were made by  a Worldwide Humantarian rganization and the Gladstone Institute also reported by the organization for ‘Security and Cooperation in Europe.

THIS IS THE REAL PANDEMIC… WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND.. Carol Sakey

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE THIS WILL DIRECTLY LINK YOU TO MY VIDEO ON THIS VERY SERIOUS TOPIC THAT IS HAPPENING WORLDWIDE.

FLAWED DEFINITIONS RISK MAJORILY SEVERELY IMPACTING LIVES OF BILLIONS OF PEOPLE WORLDWIDE.  Researched By Carol Sakey. WAKE UP NZ. https://wakeupnz.org

The Hunger numbers, are we counting them right? Refers the Millennium Goals that had expired hence the introduction to UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals within this 169 Targets. https://www.the guardian.com  17/02/2015

UN and International NGO’s rallied around the conclusion that Agenda 21 had been very successful with its anti-poverty movement, they reported that poverty had been halved and one of the biggest goals of the MSGs of significantly decreasing poverty had  was only a little shy of the target they aimed to achieve. Powerful, compelling evidence eager to convince the world that the global economic system that they had introduced is the right track to be on and to continue down with their new UN Agenda 2030. To make this happen “We must do more of this”

The UN had reported the number of hungry people worldwide, that had been steadily increasing over the previous 2 decades not decreasing.  UN Nation Governments in 1996 took the World Security Pledge that they would cut the number of people suffering from hunger in half, there we reported to be at that time 780million hungry people worldwide according to UN Reports. 2009 according to UN Reports 1,023 million hungry people approx. 30% more. NOTE: This is not unfamiliar-The International Shifting of the Goal Posts.

The Millennium Declaration was signed in 2000. At that time the MDGs pushed the base rate back to 1990, allowing them to claim China’s progress during the previous decade, even though this had nothing to do with the MDG Campaign.

At the end of 2012 with only 3yrs to go to the expiry of the MDGs the UN Food Agriculture Org., (FAO) announced an approved methodology of counting hunger, they found it necessary after reports of increase hunger spread to change their reporting, so they revised the numbers.  They managed to transform a steadily increasing rising trend in hunger stricken people to a  decreasing number. As they retroactively estimated about food supplies and new assumption were introduced that focused on ‘Calories’

It had been reported that 2009-2010 showed a dramatic increase in the number of hungry people worldwide this being due to the food price crisis, and reckless financial speculation which sparked riots in much of the developing world.  It was reported that there was a jump in numbers of undernourished people in 2009-2010, their were many voices of concern that question FAO (UN) reliability of their estimation of hungry people globally. Hence a request was made to the FAO (UN) by the committee of the ‘World Food Security’ to organize a technical round table to discuss FAO measurements of under nourishment.

The FAO had come under fire for the decision change of the methodology they had used for 25 years in their longitude study, just 3 years before its conclusion, which was seen as bad scientific standards. Scholars raised questions about the definition of FAO’s ‘hunger’ claiming it gravely underestimates the scale of the problem..The FAO counting people as hungry only by ‘Calorie’ counting.

Measurements of ‘Calorie’ intake at rock bottom levels that is ‘inadequate’ to cover a sedentary persons lifestyle (1800 calories per day) Most poor people do not lead sedentary lifestyles they are usually engaged in demanding physical labour (India the average rickshaw driver uses 3,000-4000 calories per day) FAO recognized the flaw and responded “that ‘ideally’ undernourishment should be accessed at the individual level by comparing individual energy intakes however the approach is just not feasible when it comes to gathering data”  The Food Agriculture Org., (UN) do not stop there, its said no ‘methodology is perfect, well UN’ Methodology is far from perfect. It’s predictive, uses assumption, many variable models when it comes to data gathering.

The United Nations launched its UN Agenda 2030 17 SDGs included are 169 Targets- A one script for all People-Planet for much Profit for the Global Elite. It was headed the ‘Goal of Eradicating Hunger and Poverty Once and For All’, and it has no realistic measurements of hunger. It’s seriously flawed and corrupted with whopping lies.

2.Despite the fact we collectively produce enough food for everyone in the entire world even at 3000 calories per day. Yale Prof., Thomas Pogge puts it like this “Somebody, somewhere needs to say the poor have been dramatically portrayed, this is important because it comes to question whether our global economy is actually on the right track at all”

The UN tells us their solution is working, that’s a huge whopping lie.. it is not.  The FAO have revealed the link between growth and nutrition is weak, therefore we need to put productive resources back in the hands of the people, small farmers etc.,  We need to reverse land and water grabs (Small farms being grabbed by large investors)  We need to put the handbrakes on monopolization of land, seeds and supply chains by corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta.  The data is clear that small scale farmers do a better job and are better for the environment that these large greedy corporations (Research Resource Jackson Hickols, Anthropologist. London School of Economics)

It will take moral courage to challenge the Government, to challenge the transnational corporations (TNCs) that are massively appropriating our food systems throughout the world. As long as we obscure the truth we are less likely to notice the urgency to act is upon us.    27^th September 2014 New York Times article entitled ‘Counting The Hungry’ It referenced the FAO (UN) methodology being flawed, wrong. Calculations made by ‘World Nutrition Journal.Org. The cooking of the books. The publishing of FAO’s calorie counting, the inaccurate figures.

https://www.wrm.or.uy  Article – Disputes  the FAO (UN) definition of ‘Forest’ as not being open and clear.  21/09/2016 Article ‘Silence In Response to Previous Demand for the FAO (UN) to change its flawed data as to FAO definition of ‘Forest’.  On International Day Of Forests’ 2017 another request was sent to the FAO (UN) to change its definition on the word ‘Forest’. September 2015 the World Forestry Congress was held in Durban, thousands of people packed the streets to protests against the FAO (UN) as they insisted that FAO change the definition of ‘Forest’.

 The FAO (UN) insisted on defining ‘Forest’ to be basically just a bunch of trees. Being a minimum  area of land covered by a minimum number of trees at a minimum height and a canopy percentage.  FAO promoting the establishment of million hectares of industrial plantations. A petition with a 1000 signatures was given to FAO who were hosting the World Forestry Congress gathering. But nothing changed.

The response from FAO as to its flawed definition of ‘Forest’- “There are over 200 national definitions of the word ‘Forest’, that reflect a variety of stakeholders in this matter. To facilitate the reporting data a globally valid, simple of categorization of forests is required” Tats it, and nothing changed.  FAO definition of ‘Forest’ did not influence the way 200 National definitions of ‘Forests’ was formulated at all. This definition was adopted by the UN FAO in 1948 and has remained ever since until this very day

The influence of the Food Agriculture Org., (UN) goes way beyond the definition of the word ‘Forest’. It is also utilized in the UN Climate Change Convention UNFCCC. By adopting FAO  definition of ‘Forest communities, farmers are extremely negatively affected.

UNFCCC has globally promoted a view of forests as an area of land containing only tree’s. As for the UNFCCC its mainly the tree’s, the forest that matters because of the capacity to store carbon as they grow, not forest dependent communities. Rural communities have been negatively impacted by the governments restrictions, the interests are not in the communities themselves but the ‘Offset Projects, referred to as REDD + Projects.

The flawed word ‘Forest’ introduced by the UN is a complexly false way of reducing deforestation, it’s a money making opportunity that threatens not just local communities but the whole of the country, nations worldwide. (Expanding the ‘Carbon Sink’ tree plantation). The attracting of climate finance, based on the presence of tree’s.  FAO definition of ‘Forest’ influences actions of the ‘financial and development’ institutions, promotes large industrial logging of forests, industrial tree plantations (REDD + Carbon Offsets).

The World Bank is part of the UN conglomerate that partners the FAO (UN) and has been for many decades, as to forest related initiatives. They join forces in the most ambitious plans launched during UN FCCC COP@! In Paris the “African Forest Landscape’. A restoration initiative aiming to cover 100 million hectares of deforested, degraded lands in the African continent with trees.

The World Bank jumped on the bandwagon making $1 billion available for the plan to proceed. The World Bank viewing ‘reforestation’ is crucial as to how the world itself defines a forest. (But does not disclose what FAO (UN) defines as a ‘forest’. The World Bank opened the door wide for tree plantation companies, corporations to enter communities throughout Africa.

The ambitious Restoration Plan promoted by the World Bank and FAO, that strongly resembled a previous plan they had both partnered ‘The Tropical Forestry Action Plan that totally failed.

NOTE: FAO DEFINITION OF ‘FOREST’ According to the FAO, Forest is defined as: “land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than. 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these thresholds -2022.

https://washingtonpost.com. Climate Pledges built on Flawed Emissions Data. ‘The plan to save the world from the so called worst man made climate change is built on data the world is relying on, but the ‘data’ is inaccurate. Food giants reap enormous profits during times of crisis..

https://phys.org.news-Food and Agri-business billionaires are reportedly raising their collective wealth. Child labour is on the rise..So are billionaires in the food system.

https://fairworkproject.org- Cargill is one of four companies who control 70% of the global market for agricultural commodities, including wheat, soy and cocoa

Top NZ Landowners revealed/Otago Daily Times-Online News. November 2019 :Today we reveal the top private landowners in New Zealand-family owned Tiong Group own forestry, media and property Assets.

The definition of the FAO (UN)  ‘Forest’ has extremely wide negative impacts on New Zealand because ‘Forests’ are related to land and water grabs world wide.Ardern’s so called emergency Zero Carbons is about

CONTROL’- Control of Land hence food and ultimately New Zealanders lives. ‘The Godless, Cruel Plundering of New Zealand. 

What will it take to change this ‘MORAL COURAGE”  – A NATION THAT WORKS TOGETHER ALSO STAYS TOGETHER AND THRIVES TOGETHER.

SADLY I SAY THERE ARE FAR TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO CANNOT SEE THE WOOD FOR THE TREE’S.. THEREFORE ARE UNABLE TO SEE THE MASSIVE  PROBLEMS THAT FACE US TODAY,  AS JACINDA ARDERN’S GODLESS GOVT DELIBERATELY PLUNDERS NEW ZEALAND’S SOCIETY AND ECONOMY.

NO FARMERS ‘NO FOOD’…WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND by Carol Sakey