Article In Stuff Lifestyle Sunday Magazine Feb 19^th 2023 Tusiata Avia a Christchurch poet and writer has authored a book titled ‘The Savage Coloniser Book’, this books contents have been turned into show for  an upcoming Auckland Arts Festival (there is no bleeping our of censorship or the outrageous racial hatred Tusiata Avia how any person with fair skin. There is absolutely no censorship. The journalist of the Sunday Magazine writes  “Tusiata Avia cannot wait to make you feel uncomfortable

Tusiata Avia from Christchurch is a poet and writer who’s book entitled “The Savage Coloniser Book” has been turned into a show for the upcoming Auckland Arts Festival. (Explicit language warning: Profanities have not been bleeped out in this video, against Stuff’s usual protocols, to allow the poet to read her work without censorship.)

Michelle Duff talks to Ockham winning poet Tusiata Avia as she speels out racism, fearlessness of growing up as a Pasifika in NZ. In the interview she said brown people in the audience would laugh at her and white people are uneasy. In her staged event for Auckland Arts Festival she describes the following set for her show “A carload of brown girls seek grisly revenge on Captain Cook. A guide shows how to navigate the room of white people. Saying  “cousins in Christchurch are uso’s in the so called ‘brown zone’.

She does not apologise for her despising of so called white people saying “I think its good for white people to sit and squirm a bit. I mean we’re brown people squirming all the times  (I call this incitement to hatred and racial discrimination, that has been left to run wild. If it were vice versa then the police would go knocking on doors, there would be arrests.  The Government, police acceptance and promotion of Cultural Marxism’.She eludes to white people stepping outside their comfort zone, then “states she loves her white audience, as silent as they are”. She also refers to colonization and white settlers that perpetuated damage in the pacific in the past is still here right now, and her dislike of white people to the massacre 15 th March 2019 Christchurch Attack of one loan wolf from Australia, she then linked this as others have to ‘white supremacy’. However the truth comes out when the Royal Commission of Inquiry responds to 17 Questions by the community of New Zealand where the Royal Commission of Inquiry stated that “3 yrs prior to the attack and up to the date of the attack 15.3.2019 the Muslim community in Christchurch were seriously concerned about a Daesh attack (ISIS)

Tusiata Avia wrote these words

“The White Spirits rise up from the swamp, and many bad things happen. The White Spirits rise up from the swamp and kill those that kneel and pray”

“I think it’s good for white people to sit and squirm a bit. I mean, we’re [brown people] squirming all the time,” Avia says. She states publicly that “she does not care what people think, because she is writing for herself”.

The Sunday Magazine journalist states that ‘Avia is warm and funny, she represents the truth, the universal truth about colonisation, which was basically rape and pillage and massacre.

Avia was raised in Christchurch to a Samoan father and Pakeha mother. Her mother was of Scottish and English ancestry. She says “I have colonisers roots”

Actually saying this out loud refers to the 250^th Anniversary of James Cooks Arrival In New Zealand:– Hey James, yeah you in that big Endeavour sailing the blue water like a big arsehole.  F—YOU,BITCH- James. I heard that some-one shoved a knife right into the gap between your white ribs at Kealakekua Bay. I am going there make a big Makahiki-luau cook a white pig, feed it to the dogs and  F—YOU UP, BITCH. Hey James, its us these days, we are driving around in SUVs looking for ya or white men like you who might be thieves or rapists or kidnappers, or murderers- yeah, or any of your descendants or any of your carnations – cos you know – ay bitch We’re gonna F..YOU UP.

Tonight, James its me Lani, Danielle and a car full of brown girls we find you. You’ve got another woman in a headlock and I’ve got my fathers pig hunting knife in my fist and we are coming to get you.- sailing around in your ‘Resolution’- your ‘Friendship’- your ‘Discovery’ and you F—king ‘Freelove’. Watch you ribs James, cos I am coming with Kalaniopu’u, Kanekapolei, Kana’ina, Keawe’opala, Kuka ‘ilimoko who is God and Nua’a who is the King with a knife. And then James, then we are gonna ‘F— You UP FOR GOOD BITCH’.. Author Tusiata Avia. Sunday Magazine.

Image if the tables were turned this would have been the main item before the House-House . The Maori Party would have made mince meat of it. The police would have raided your house. So why hasn’t the Race Relations Commission been onto this?

I have many hundred of people with Maori and Pacific Island blood never have I ever heard them speak like this. This is just plain evil.

International Socialist Aotearoa summer reading – The Best of 2016. 18^th December 2016 reported. We asked writers, activists and intellectuals to offer picks from their reading and watching this year for others over the summer. Refers to a new Tusiata Avia collection, moving, angry, dextrous work, has received all sorts of hype and richly deserved. “Wild Dogs Under My Skirt’ and ‘Bloodclot’

Further reference : A celebration of Aotearoa NZ’s LGBTQI writing talent poet Tusiata Avia asks what collection of molecules am. I and I think about queer kinship and how do I trace my ancestors?

https://samesamebutdifferent.co.nz › 2021/06 › si…  Poet Tusiata Avia asks what collection of molecules am I and think about queer kinship and how do I trase my ancestors?

https://nzpoetryshelf.com/tag/sugar-magnolia-wilson/

NZ Book Shelf  Tusiata Avia is an internationally acclaimed poet, performer and children’s author. She has published 4 collections of poetry, 3 children’s books and her play ‘

The Word Christchurch festival 2018 TUSIATA AVIA GUEST PROGAMMER. Described as Socialist Feminist Activist Poet Writer-Author. https://wordchristchurch.co.nz/content/uploads/2018/07/SPUB0000_WORD-2018_Festival-Programme_LR.pdf

Patrons ans supporters of this festival included Corporate Patrons. Supporting publishers- Auckland university Press, Awa Press, Allen & Unwin, Penguin, Victoria University Press.

Partners: includes British Council. Harcourts, Kate Sylvester, LISTENER, Heartland, University of Canterbury. Christchurch City Council. And RATA Foundation and more  were Festival Partner Christchurch 2018

Major Funders were Christchurch City Council CREATIVE NZ and RATA Foundation

The 2023 Auckland Arts Festival Funders and Sponsor- Auckland Council, CREATIVE NZ . Major Funders are FOUNDATION NORTH, PUB CHARITY, FOUR WINDS, NZCT. Gold Sponsors are The NZ Herald and Auckland Live. Silver Sponsors COLENSO BBDO and Bronze Sponsors are Russel McVeagh, AA, Think Science, TPDD Corporation and FLITS.

Corporate Patrons..MOJO, DELMAINE, RICKETMASTER, BDO , BECA and G H MUMM Champage

FUNDING PARTNERS..The LION Foundation, Asia NZ Foundation, Made In Scotland, K’ARTS. Australian High Commission NZ, Canada Down Under, Government , The Trusts Community Foundation Of Canada a;; supporting the appalling incitement promotion of hatred for anyone who does not have a brown skin. The language used and the discrimination NOT censored and published By Sunday Magazine Stuff NZ

LINKS:

https://www.aaf.co.nz/support-us/sponsors

https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/sunday-magazine/131236724/tusiata-avia-cant-wait-to-make-you-uncomfortable?fbclid=IwAR2KFxpokBZCbAiVqEvshicuCmwSwatAgyh5B8jwJjRSMi_vXPYK7T8jRvQ

https://iso.org.nz/2016/12/18/socialist-summer-reading-the-best-of-2016/

. https://wordchristchurch.co.nz/content/uploads/2018/07/SPUB0000_WORD-2018_Festival-Programme_LR.pdf

https://nzpoetryshelf.com/tag/sugar-magnolia-wilson/

https://samesamebutdifferent.co.nz › 2021/06

SOFT LAW: The term soft law is used to denote agreements, principles and declarations that are not legally binding. Soft law instruments are predominantly found in the international sphere. UN General Assembly resolutions are an example of soft law.. For example when NZ signed the Non-Binding UN Agenda 2030 it was accepted by all political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington. Soft Law is a stop gap to ‘hard law’- legislations. Ardern entered the UN Agenda 2030 into Domestic Policies, it them became ‘legalized hard law’ (Note not necessarily lawful). Soft Law needs no political consensus, it is just accepted as it is and not opposed in parliament. Hence mobilises a consistent general response without consensus. (Soft law is non-binding)

CONTRACT LAW:Is common throughout the country, some specific court interpretations of a particular element of the contract may vary between the states, countries. In New Zealand there are 5 key elements of a valid contract, a clear offer, unequivocal acceptance, adequate consideration, an intention all parties enter into legal relations under certain terms. Based on the principle that agreements must be honoured

CUSTOMARY LAW:The rulings of Customary Law institutions can be inconsistent, unpredictable and discriminatory. As decisions are often not recorded, and appeals from  decisions may be difficult, there is insufficient monitoring and supervision of their operations. Customary Law: Under the doctrine of aboriginal rights, customary laws or practices of a continuous nature may be granted the force of law by the courts and an associated rights enforced if they have not been extinguished by statute. The four principles of customary law, the general principles of law are laches, good faith, res judicata, and the impartiality of judges. International tribunals rely on these principles when they cannot find authority in other sources of international law. Customary Law is consuetudinary or unofficial law) exists where: a certain legal practice is observed and. the relevant actors consider it to be an opinion of law or necessity (opinio juris).

CIVIL LAW: The term civil law derives from the Latin ius civile, the law applicable to all Roman cives or citizens. Its origins and model are to be found in the monumen- tal compilation of Roman law commissioned by the Emperor Justinian in the sixth century CE. Civil Law covers disputes between individuals, companies and sometimes local or central government. Civil law disputes are generally the cases in court that are not about breaking a criminal law. New Zealand’s civil justice system works in such a way that cases can be resolved through a claims process. What are 4 examples of civil law? Four types of Civil Law deal with Contracts, Property, Family Relations, Civil wrongs causing physical injury or injury to property (tort). Civil law, also known as private law, regulates disputes between private individuals or entities (e.g. companies). It is thus different to cases dealing with matters between individuals and the state, i.e. public law and criminal law. The drawback of Civil Law is that even if previous cases show you should win your case, there is no guarantee a judge will interpret the code in the same way on your case,

COMMON LAW: Began in England in the 11th century with the establishment by William the Conqueror, King of England, of the Kings Courts. The courts, in deciding local disputes, applied local customs. Over time, these customs became rules and were the basis for later courts to make decisions on similar disputes. Henry 11 is recorded as being the alleged ‘Father of Common Law”.  At the centre of common law is a legal principle known as stare decisis, which is a Latin phrase that roughly means “to stand by things decided.” In practice, stare decisis is just a fancy way of saying that courts and judges need to follow earlier decisions and rulings — otherwise known as caselaw. : Much of New Zealand’s law, such as its common law tradition and constitutional framework, has been inherited from the English legal system, which was applied (so far as applicable to the circumstances of New Zealand) in 1840. Independent, fair and efficient courts are an important cornerstone in our democracy. New Zealand has common law, which means judges make legal decisions based on previous judges’ decisions as well as on statutes (written law) passed by Parliament. Common law, also known as case law, is a body of unwritten laws based on legal precedents established by the courts. Common law draws from institutionalized opinions and interpretations from judicial authorities and public juries. Common laws sometimes prove the inspiration for new legislation to be enacted. Common Law is better than Civil Law as it  allows for flexibility allows  judges to be able to respond to future cases, even those that they had not predicted. Common law is independent of political influence, ensures consistency in the legal systems and is clearer in instructions compared to civil law.  Civil law systems are codified statutes predominate.

My Rights Under Common Law:-Blackstone’s Introduction to the Study of the Law and the Constitution lists three primary common law rights: personal security, personal liberty and private property, and auxiliary rights necessary to secure them, such as access to justice.  Common Law protects Human Rights:- These rights and freedoms are protected by the common law principle that legislation should not infringe fundamental rights and freedoms unless the legislation expresses a clear intention to do so and the infringement is reasonable. ‘Firstly Do No Harm’, This harm/no–harm distinction at common law cannot be dismissed

NOTE: An interesting case -Judge Wylie (Published 12/3/2020) A High Court Judge opened the door for a new ‘Tort’ laws making corporates responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions. This is related to 2 out of 3 claims made by Climate Change Iwi Leaders Group Chair Mike Smith against Fonterra, Genesis Energy, Dairy Holdings, NZ Steel, Z Energy, NZ Refining and BT Mining. Has had a similar case against the government.

The hearing was to consider the corporates move to strike out the claim could not be reasonable argued. Wylie released a decision saying “while Smith could not proceed on already established rules of negligence and public nuisance, a new area of law could be created. He said “I am reluctant to conclude that the recognition of a new tortious duty which makes corporates responsible to the public for their emissions is untenable. It may, for example, be that the special damage rule in public nuisance could be modified, it may be that climate change science will lead to an increased ability to model the possible effects of emissions”. Smith wanted the court to declare the corporates have caused a public nuisance through their emissions and order they move to ‘zero net’ emissions from their activities by 2030.

The Judge referred to a paper where the Supreme Court chief alongside other judges, states the problem of climate change does not adhere well to established legal doctrine.  “The Common Law method brings stability, but it can also allow for the injection of new ideas and for the creation of a new responses as required” Judge Wiley cited. The statement of claim raises three caused of action, all in tort-public nuisance, negligence and breach of an inchoate duty. Declarations are sought that each of the defendants has unlawfully caused or contributed to the public nuisance alleged or breached duties said to be owed to Smith, Injunctions are also sought requiring each defendant to produce, or cause, zero net emissions from its activities by 2030.

Judge Wylie said “Smith’s negligence claim could not go ahead because there was no proximity between Smith and the Corporates, and that if he ruled in favour, floodgates may open”. He said “”the public nuisance claim was  clearly untenable”

Judge Wylie said “ Even if Smith was successful in his wider claim it would be difficult to craft an injunction which did not clash with Parliament, Government policy and other law. It would in effect have the court acting as regulator requiring specialist no judicial expertise. Meanwhile a High Court judge had declines an application to strike down a judicial review of Thames Coromandel District Councils refusal to sign a ‘climate change’ declaration. Justice Gault also declined the councils bid for security deposit, saying it was in the publics interest for the case to go ahead and the group seeking the review could not afford it.  Justice Gault did not look at the merits of the case, but said “the bar for striking out a judicial review should be hight”. Arguments in the application looked at whether the declaration had any meaningful impact or whether it was simple binary decision for the local Mayor to sign or not.

The decision on the Smith case is covered in more detail in the Energy and Environment  documentation

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL2003/S00142/judge-leaves-door-open-on-climate-change-case-just.htm

https://energyandenvironment.net.nz/home.html       Carol Sakey  https://wakeupnz.org

I was raised a devout catholic, in 2020 I realised that the Pope was bastardising the Catholic Church. That many of the main church’s had entered the worship of Gaia (Mother Earth) namely Eco Socialism. Hence I felt the need to open up this Godless den of inequity, hence the following…

The Council For Global Capitalism implemented by WEF Strategic Partnership with the UN. A New World Order implemented by a global Corporate Capture, financial Institutions and Banks, these are advancing the globalist elite One World Corporate capture of the planet. Orchestrated by WEF and other major players-philanthropists Bill Gates, Ford Foundation and other large foundations also the Pope. The Pope promoting this Global Elitist Corporate Capture through the UN Agenda 2030 as moral and good for all humankind. This is crony capitalism and fascism, communism. The Vatican partnership with the Council for Inclusive Capitalism collaboration through the key leader a prominent member of the Rothschild family.

The global government, one of financial and political elites, this is no conspiracy theory, they are so sure of themselves its in your face, they are not hiding it, there is no secrecy. Certain politicians working together for their own purposes. This is deliberate pre-panned social, behavior engineering to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. UN Agenda 2030. IA 2030   17 Global Goals 14 of which include vaccines, inoculations. (A New Normal). This is not random its is well planned. Yet there is this denial, its not really happening. Wrong, we are in the eye of the political economical storm of Corporate Capture.

Once upon a time global governance was hardly ever talked about. Mention One World Governance and you would be called a conspiracy theorist. It’s a conspiracy alright. George Bush, Obama, Joe Biden, Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and many other prominent well known political figures have talked about the New World Order, including George Soros and Henry Kissinger. Clinton Admin Deputy Secretary of State ‘Strobe Talbot’ in the Time Magazine said  “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete. All states will recognize a singly global authority. .National Sovereignty was not such a good idea after all”. He also added

‘The free world formed multilateral financial institutions depending on UN Member States willingness to give up a degree of their sovereignty. The IMF-International Monetary Fund can virtually dictate fiscal policies, even including how much tax a government should levy  its citizens. The general agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates how much duty a nation can charge on imports. These organization can be seen as proto-ministries of Trade, Finance and Development for a United World”.

A member of the Globalist Council on Foreign Relations Richard Gardner in an article ‘Foreign Affairs Magazine in 1974 titled ‘The Hard Road To World Order’ wrote “In short ‘the house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’. Hence eroding national sovereignty piece by piece, “will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault”

The NOW (New World Order) has been called several names including ‘Multilateral World Order, the 4^th Industrial Revolution and the ‘Great Reset’, all mean the same. The Corporate Capture of the world. 13^th June 2019 the UN and WEF signed an official strategic partnership to advance, accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals, namely Sustainable- Unsustainable and unrealistic. Sustainability is a Global Corporate Advertising term.

The Global Council for Inclusive Capitalism does exist, has met focus point at the World Economic Forum relates to their role in the global governance, and the Vatican is a key player. The Global COVID Pandemic, Climate Doom and Gloom are the trojan horse. Crisis , Crisis , Crisis, whilst there is crisis people can be easily controlled, out of fear they become controlled. The Global Pandemic the perfect crisis, the window of opportunity. One crisis after another the dominoes effect until the one world order of corporate capture is accepted as norm. The WEF the global high level think tank.  The Global Council founder is Lynn Forester De Rothchild, a member of the Rothchild Dynasty, the Rothchild Dynasty has influenced governments for generations. In 2020 Pope Francis and the Vatican aligned with the Rothchild Council, where the Pope said all religions must unite with the leaders of capital to build a society, an economy that is fair for all” He lied, he has jumped on the corporate bandwagon. This is not fair for all. It lines the pockets of the elite wealthy and creates much more poverty in the world. Just look at what’s happened to NZ over this last three years- the plundering of NZ. This is the bastardization of the catholic church and other main stream churches world wide. Eco churches. IN NZ some Councils even give grants to Eco Churches.

This system of what the WEF calls a ‘Shared Economy’ is the one of “You will own nothing, but you will be happy. You will have no privacy, borrow everything, be completely reliant on the government for your survival. Inclusive Capitalism is a global Godless Con. This is the rebranding of ‘Communism’. The cost is your ‘Freedom’. Hence the replacement of the Free market Enterprise Economy. The end of Freedom. Replacing the freedom to choose, property rights with Stakeholder Corporate Capitalism’.

The Vatican-Pope Francis and the Elite Globalists call themselves ‘The Guardians’. I am telling you the truth.  Who are members of this Globalist Elite partnership with the Pope-Vatican. Rothschilds, BP, Bank Of America, UN, Johnson & Johnson, Visa, Rockefeller Foundations, Ford Foundation, and many other large companies and corporations, the list is extensive. It represents a corporate led One World Governance. Corporate led government mixed with UN Member political leaders and backed by philanthropists such as Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation etc.,

This is a global system that is rigged to build a new system ‘The New Normal’ to centralize wealth into their hands, to benefit the global elite. Yes, and the Pope, Pope Francis has been pushing the ‘Woke’ ideology of climate alarmism and a One world Religion which is in conflict with traditional Christian doctrine. The Pope and the Vatican are enforcing carbon controls and taxation in the name of climate alarmism ‘zero emissions’. This amounts to a global shadow government, a massive corporate cabal that is implementing social changes, the spreading of the ‘Woke’ ideology, hundreds if not thousands of corporations are involved. There are no checks and balances. The public unable to hold them responsible. When the public openly publicly speak about this they are targeted as conspiracy theorist by main stream media, whom are all key players. The Propaganda machine

Finally Ukrainian MP said “We fight for Ukraine. We fight for the New World Order. Pope Francis the Chaplain of the UN. The Roman Catholic Church  to be a ‘sacrament’ in the world, in the realms of global politics, education, economy, infrastructure. Pope Francis’s 2020 ‘Universal’ Initiatives with UN language, scope and content. The Global Political manifesto of the Vatican-Pope Francis.. Oct 2020 Pope Francis ‘UN Global Compact on Education, backed by UN advisory group and political leaders to meet UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Target number 4.7. The Council of Inclusive Capitalism, partner the Vatican, Pope Francis with 500 companies, corporations together with assets of $10.5 trillion.

Pope Francis includes all parties, a ‘new humanism’, strategic global corporate interests, opportunities to fund the initiatives of the Roman Catholic Church. A win-win relationship. A ‘new humanism’ to collaborate with ‘transhumanism’. The Pope – the chaplain of the ‘House of Lucifer’, bastardising  Christianity.

Source Information -Tim Brown- author of Freedom Outpost originally published by ‘Sons of Liberty Media / https://evangelicalfocus.com/vatican-files/10012/pope-francis-the-chaplain-of-the-united-nations

I urge you to visit my website https://wakeupnz.org

Carol Sakey.

As other UN Nations agreed to UN Agenda 2030 (Non-binding Agreement), Ardern had to go one step further by entering UN Agenda 2030 into New Zealand Domestic Policy hence making Agenda 2030 Binding, not only did she do this but she urged other UN Nations to follow her lead, as she boasted about this when she was a guest speaker at a Global Shapers gathering hosted by Bill and Melinda Gates.  To be UN Agenda 2030 was adopted 25^th September 2015 includes 17 Global Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 Targets to transform economy and re-engineer human behaviour, social engineering. References:- Poverty, environment, housing, energy, health, infrastructure etc.,  UN Agenda 2030 is namely a ‘soft law’, does not require a referenda, or parliamentarians to give their approval only the leaders of the Regime-government of the country in question. Sustainability is a word used for multi-stakeholder corporate capture of the world’s economy, a global introduced locally acted out advertising campaign. The 1987 Report stated ‘development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’.

There are legal implications as to UN Agenda 2030, it was adopted by way of a  UN General Assembly resolution 70/1 that reaffirms commitment for UN Agenda 2030 implementation “in a manner that is consistent with the rights and obligations of States under International Law (Para 18) despite the faxt that the content, text of UN Agenda 2030 is NOT legally binding. This employs Human Rights as a lens.  Some of the intersections between UN Agenda 2030 and International Law may create legal obligations for UN Member Nation States

International Law and Sustainable Development:  International Law is a legal system (NOT necessarily lawful). It governs relationships between countries, has extended its scope to include international organizations and individuals. There are four recognized sources of International Law (Art 8 Statute International Court Of Justice). They are International Conventions. International Custom. General Principles of Law. Judicial Decisions. International Law is based on the mutual consent of nations as in UN treaties and conventions, or way that is practiced and then eventually becomes custom. UN Member States are legally bound by the international instrument,  through the Sovereign acts of signing and ratifying the instrument.  UN Member States may be legally bound when a practice becomes a ‘custom’, which happens when two requirements are met. (1) There must be an established State practice that must be ‘general and consistent’. (2) The practice in question must be accompanied by a sense of ‘Legal Obligation’ and ‘Accepted as Law’, thus meaning that States carry out the practice because authorities believe it is a legal obligation to do so. (3) Several UN Agenda 2030 SDGs and Targets mirror ‘Legal Obligations’ that UN Member States have already assumed under ‘Treaty Law and ‘Custom’. The UN Agenda 2030 Indicators can be used to measure compliance with ‘International Law’ where intersections exist between targets and ‘International Legal Obligations.

Human Rights ‘Law within the Global Development Indicator Framework: Preamble. Para 3- Realizing the ‘Human Rights for ALL’ UN Agenda 2030 actually breaches the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which forms part of the International Bill Of Rights. NZ Bill Of Rights 1991 and NZ Human Rights Act 1993

Human Rights for ALL:Does not fit New Zealand Governments ‘Two Tier Marxist Ideology’. It is noted that NZ Government is actually a Corporation. The sovereign (people) of New Zealand cannot be ruled by a Corporation unless they make an agreement via a ‘Contract’ with that Corporation. ‘Hereby established a corporation, to be called the New Zealand Government Property Corporation’, cannot legally action legislations but as I have said before ‘what is namely legal is not necessarily lawful’

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has the government of New Zealand registered as a corporation under the name of ‘Her Majesty The Queen Of England In Right Of New Zealand’.  Note Prince Charles has not yet been crowned as King of England. It is her Majesty Queen Elizabeth’s role when a new prime minister is appointed to meet and appoint the new prime minister. But Queen Elizabeth is dead, then how can Chris Hipkin be Prime Minister? Then I question “is Chris Hipkin a fake Prime Minister” ?

UN Agenda 2020 ‘human rights for ALL’ (Preamble para 3) is unrealistic. UN/WEF/NGO’s and all their cohorts are seriously breaching, violating International and National Human Rights for example Freedom of Speech, Freedom Of Assembly, Freedom Of Religion. NZ Bill Of Rights 1990 ‘Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment that includes jabs. Individuals freedom to choose is taken away by being pressured, coerced, mandated or lose ones income, making  people reliant of an authoritarian regime that is already seriously harming New Zealanders.

UN Agenda 2030 SDGs 1 & 2: Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights stipulates that everyone has the right to “an adequate standard of living… including adequate food” and “to be free from hunger”. United Nations Member States that are parties to the Covenant thus have a legal obligation to fulfil Goals 1 and 2. Far too many people in New Zealand have an inadequate standard of living. 67,000 people on the backlog of the hospital waiting list.  Approx. 25,000 people waiting on the Social Housing list.  RNZ reported 2^nd August 2022 41,000 New Zealanders will bed down without adequate access to housing tonight. WSWS.Org report 9/9/2022 ‘New Zealand’s worsening homelessness crisis driven by property speculation, soaring rents and not enough public housing’. Salvation Army reported in a Winter Appeal 2022 they have provided more than 90,000 food parcels in NZ, as New Zealanders are struggling to put food on the table.

NOTE: UN Agenda 2030 and UN Member States Obligations to Comply: With Indicators 1.1.1.1.1 and 1.2.2 measure the prevalence of poverty that policy makers must verify compliance with the legal obligations, commitments of UN Agenda 2030. To demonstrate that the SDGs are not merely aspirational but are reinforced legally, a responsibility of UN Member States. This must be acted put universally. (Universally- by everyone in every case)

UN Agenda 2030 (para 5 of Resolution 70/1). Un Agenda 2030 is of an unprecedented scope and significance, is accepted by ALL countries, is applicable to ALL. Goals and Targets that involve the ENTIRE world, a ‘New Global Obligation’. (an obligation equates to an action that is morally bound). The obligations, commitments that the NZ Government (Corporation) has agreed to are anything but moral. Global Obligations: Have not yet received adequate legal recognition, regulation and realization.

The UN Agenda SDGs As Legal Stimulant: Legal does not necessarily mean ‘Lawful’. There is no clear correspondence between the SDGs and International Laws. International Law comprises of ‘hard law’. Binding treaties, agreements are ‘customary laws’, otherwise known as ‘soft law’. Soft Law for example relates to Non-binding but still significant  legal guidelines, policy declaration, codes of conduct or UN General Assembly resolutions. Soft Law often precedes the codification of ‘international norms; and ‘practices’ into binding law, in two principal ways through ‘soft law’ instruments for example as in UN General Assembly Resolutions that may become binding, codification in a treat or transformation into ‘customary international law’. UN Member States may choose to codify the principles, declaration and policy prescriptions that have been introduced by the UN General Assembly in treaties, thus transforming them from voluntary influential instruments into legal obligations. UN Agenda 2030 does not explicitly create new legal obligations, but the intersections between international law and the SDGs stimulates greater compliance. A more plausible route to create legal obligations out of an aspirational plan in this case UN Agenda 2030, therefore UN Agenda 2030 is the formation of customary international law (Soft Law)

If a significant number of States pursue the SDGs, they may become legally binding as custom. There is no timeline for that transformation; it does not necessarily take long. It is simply a matter of enough States undertaking the practice with a discernible sense of obligation. However Jacinda Ardern decided to take the lead and urged others to also follow her, when she introduced UN Agenda 2030 into Domestic Policy. Ardern was a guest speaker at a gathering arranged by Bill & Melinda Gates for the ‘WEF Global Shapers’. Ardern boasted to the audience that NZ is the first nation in the world to enter UN Agenda 2030 into NZ domestic policy, hence making the non-binding UN Agenda 2030 binding (Legally not necessarily lawful)

If enough States abide by Goal 17 and authorities believe that they have a legal obligation to do so, related targets may become customary international law and have the same force of law as an investment treaty pursuing this very goal.

Rooting the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs in concrete as legal principles ultimately serves Global Corporate capture. However  does seriously violate  International and National Human Rights. UN Agenda 2030 is devoid of Common Laws as at the very heart  of Common Law is ‘Firstly Do No Harm’. There is no doubt massive harm is in the process of being done to populations, economies across the world.

(Resource: International-human-rights-law-agenda-2030-english.pdf )