Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

RUDOLF STEINER SCHOOLS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE UN ‘UNESCO’ AS UNESCO ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS  ‘Rudolf Steiner -Waldorf Schools.

Here is some background history on Rudolf Steiner Schools. Steiner Schools are built on the philosophy and the founding of anthroposophy. The first school was opened in response to Emil Molt the owner, managing director of the  Waldorf Astoria Cigarette Company in Stuttgart Germany. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union Waldorf (Steiner ) Schools began to proliferate in Central & Eastern Europe, many walso opened in Asia and in particular in China

UNESCO (UN Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organization of the UN) support, promote Steiner (Waldorf) Schools. Waldorf is Steiner Schools. Many UN Nation States report the ideals, ethical principles of the Waldorf-Steiner School movement corresponds to UNESCO. UNESCO sponsored an exhibition on these schools at the 44th Education Congress in Geneva

Steiner-Waldorf report that ‘the Indigenous Waldorf Education is fully recognized and supported by  the UN (UNESCO)  Inclusive Waldorf schools today: what can we build on and what is necessary in the 21st century? The self-governing Waldorf school intended by Steiner offers the framework for implementing inclusion, enabling a participatory, open-minded education for children and adolescents in the 21st century . It is reported that UNESCO Associated Network of Schools links Educational institutions worldwide around one global common goal. Supporting international intercultural dialogue in the minds of children and young people. This is described as ‘Sustainable Developmental and Quality Education.

The Freunde der Erziehungskunst  *Our ambition is to invite Waldorf Schools worldwide to become part of the UNESCO network as UNESCO Associated Schools (ASP network) as there are many commonalities in the ideals and values of UNESCO and the practice in Waldorf Schools.   *We would like to implement a network of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools to connect the Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide, to exchange experiences, knowledge and good practices with schools and communities. You can find a list of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide. Stating the following:-

*We take part in initiatives of the UNESCO e.g. UNESCO’s Futures of Education initiative that aims to rethink education and shape the future. The initiative is catalyzing a global debate on how knowledge, education and learning need to be reimagined in a world of increasing complexity, uncertainty, and precarity.                      *With the international students campaign Waldorf-One-World-Day, the Freunde der Erziehungskunst established a project that contributes to the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the related 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  Steiner School philosophy of Anthroposophy is a spiritual philosophy; not a religion. https://www.waldorf-salzburg.at/ – Waldorf Campus Salzburg – Rudolf Steiner Schule © 2024)

https://schools2030.org/  Catalyzing School-Driven Holistic Learning Innovations to Achieve SDG4 by 2030. Schools2030 launched in 2020 and works in over 1000 government schools and community learning centres across ten countries: Schools2030 is collecting data from assessments, through our evaluation work with technical partners, and through our research projects, to build a body of evidence that can inform teaching practices and policy-decisions the world over. All Schools2030 methodologies, toolkits and data are/will be made freely available on our website to support transformative education agendas across the world. (https://schools2030.org/)

Are Steiner Schools inclusively entering  Universal Education 2030???  UN Agenda 2030 Education last year did not  match up with what the Steiner School curriculum in NZ , however both the Universal Education 2030 (UN) like Steiner Schools do both follow a spiritual type guidance.. an enlightenment rather than a Christian religious format???? Eeem I suspect that UNESCO is trying to infiltrate, embed itself in the Steiner School movement worldwide. ??? (A guess-estimate)

RESEARCHER: Cassie

WakeUpNZ

...

Other Blog Posts

Carol Sakey
MEDICAL

SHE LIKENED HER EXPERIENCE TO ONE OF TORTURE ‘ MEDICAL EXPERIMENT IN AND OUTSIDE OF NEW ZEALANDS BORDERS

NZ Herald 26th July 2023 reported how a Gynecologist has been accused of sexually abusing over 200 patients and is sentenced to 20 years prison. The sentence for Robert Hadden, 64, was a measure of vindication for hundreds of former patients who accused the doctor of molesting them during examinations but saw an earlier prosecution end with a plea bargain that spared him from jail.
In statements over the past two days, US District Judge Richard M. Berman said the case was like none he’d seen before and involved “outrageous, horrific, beyond extraordinary, depraved sexual abuse”. He noted that at least 245 women Hadden treated said they were abused.
The federal trial involved a smaller number of victims. Hadden was convicted of four counts of enticing women to cross state lines so he could sexually abuse them. Nine victims testified at the trial, describing how Hadden molested them during gynecology treatments, starting in the late 1980s, at prominent hospitals. According to trial testimony, Hadden benefited from the prestige of the hospitals where he worked as he groomed his patients in a private office decorated with pictures of his children as he conversed with them about their personal lives. But once he had isolated them after a chaperone or nurse left the treatment room, he fondled and probed them with gloveless fingers and sometimes orally
NEW ZEALAND PRIOR TO THE MASS CLINICAL TRIALS OF THE COVID JAB. New Zealand’s history on experimenting on patients is not angelic, in fact its cruel how many women have tragically prematurely have died because of a medical experiment at Greenlane Hospital Auckland.
DOCTOR GREEN OF GREENLAND HOSPITAL ‘I WONDER HOW MANY PEOPLE REMEMBER THE PAIN AND PREMATURE DEATH HE CAUSED WOMEN IN NZ?’ The horrific experiment at Greenlane Hospital. Women with cervical cancer were deceived and mistreated for years. The official inquiry took 6 months and a number of public hearings
Ronald W. Jones, an obstetrician-gynecologist at National Women’s who played a central role in exposing this terrible scandal. In Greens early days of practice he sterilized cats on the hospital grounds. Nurses prepared surgical trays whilst Green operated on them to spay them in the operating theatre instructing medical students how to kill fleas with ethyl chloride. He petitioned the Queen requesting her to exhume Jane Seymour’s (Henry V111 third wife) to determine whether she has, had a C Section.
Green had conducted an experiment on women for 7 years before being exposed. His experiment was to show that CIS would not progress to Invasive Cervical Cancer, however there was medical evidence that this did often progress into an invasive cervical cancer and it had been known for decades.
.Green would eventually withhold treatment from more than a hundred women with CIS . Just how many women died as a result has never been confirmed; the Cartwright Report did not give a figure.
Green’s experiment was dangerous seriously jeopardizing the lives of patients. It was not even a well-designed experiment. The study had no control group, no stopping rules, no consent forms, and no data safety monitoring board. The results showed that CIS had invasive potential and that many subjects with untreated CIS had gone on to develop cervical cancer.
What allowed the experiment to run for so many years, despite protests, was the authoritarian hospital culture of the period, in which department heads presided over their fiefdoms like absolute monarchs.
Medical Professional Jones published a 1984 paper he thought this would really awaken colleagues and the Hospital authorities at National Womens Hospital Greenlane Auckland, there was no response from medical colleagues or the wider medical community. Green’s treatment of CIS did not change in the slightest
Seven years of Dr Greens experiment before a governmental inquiry which is called the Cartwright Inquiry (Cartwright Report) by Judge Silvia Cartwright
The United States Public Health Service kept the Tuskegee experiment going in plain sight for a full forty years. It took seven years for Peter Buxtun, a young employee, to convince anyone that the experiment was unethical. Whistleblowers at other institutions have had to agitate for even longer. The twenty-two years that elapsed between McIndoe’s initial protest against Green’s experiment and the publication of the Cartwright Report in 1988 may seem excessive, but the stonewalling and delays faced by McIndoe and his allies are the rule rather than the exception.
Many scandals vanish from public consciousness within days and leave no trace.
The Cartwright Report also revealed that Green had ordered nurses to take vaginal smears from 2,200 newborn baby girls without informing the parents. Another experiment of Green’s was internal radiation called the ‘R’Series experiment. This was to determine which of two treatment for Stage 1 or 2 cervical cancer was better, radiation alone (internal and external) or internal radiation plus surgery. Once again, Green “enrolled” subjects in the experiment and randomized them to one of the two treatments without their informed consent—indeed, without their awareness. The women were told that the most appropriate treatment had been chosen for them. They had no idea they were in a research study
Just as shocking was the testimony of many of the hospital’s patients. “I loathed and detested being a patient and going through the clinic, one woman said. She had been given a cone biopsy without her consent and would have never known had she not secretly looked at her medical file when her doctor was out of the room. Another woman said she was treated like an “animated cadaver.” Yet another said that after she had undergone treatment for invasive cancer, “I woke up from that anesthetic screaming, absolutely screaming. I was out of control because I was in so much pain. It was like waking up to torture.” A cesium rod had pierced the wall of her cervical canal. Doctors never told her what happened. She did not learn the truth until the inquiry.
...
Carol Sakey
MEDICAL

Medical Abuse Gynecology New Zealand

Gynecologists in NZ are true physcopaths. Basic things they don’t know and there main aim are to get your organs for NO reason but financial.
Consenting processes illegal and thousands atrocities against women.
Unnecessary high rate of castration.
Do no trust NZ gynecologist.
Thousands are bed bound and gaslight. Either commit suicide or live in horrific pain.
– IUD pushed like lollies(toxic)
– Endometrial Ablation pushed like low risk
– Mesh thousands harmed without consent
Unnecessary hysterectomy for benign reasons.
NZ women are just Guinea pigs for them. As no one has any accountability. The should have shame but there is none.
...

AGENDA 2030- SDG 1 ‘COMMUNIST DEGROWTH ‘SUPREME WEALTH AND EXTREME POVERTY IS SIGNIFICANTLY HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME

UN Agenda 2030: 17 Global Development Goals 169 Targets over 230 Indicators. For starters ignore the warm fuzzy language. Starting from the very beginning, is a very good place to start to describe firstly UN Agenda 2030 SDG ‘End Poverty in ALL Forms Everywhere’.   Remember behind the masks of the fuzzies hides evil monsters.

NZ’s ugly monsters are the political cronies that hide themselves in the toilet bowl of Wellington. UN Agenda 2030 SDG1 – End Poverty in ALL Forms Everywhere’ equates to, really means  ‘Redistribute wealth and resources to make the super rich much more wealthier and the middle class poorer. The super rich have hugely increased their share of the worlds wealth.  The 2020 Wealth, Health  & Inequality Report stated the largest rise in billionaire wealth was recorded as never seen before. The wealthiest in the world making 6 times more than the bottom 90% of humanity. That’s collectively $2.7 Billion per day. Where extreme wealth gaps have totally undermined SDG1 (Ending Poverty in ALL forms everywhere). The DAVOS WEF crowd reveling in their concentration of increased wealth. (World Bank reports Agenda 2030  SDG 1 unlikely to be met)

It is reported that ‘Extreme Wealth’ and ‘Extreme Poverty’ is significantly increasing at the same time. All those basic living expenses have significantly increased in price as worldwide more people struggle. Many more New Zealanders are struggling as inflation increases so does food, gas, energy, rents, loans and mortgages. On top of this is the increased crime, Newshub reported 23rd May 2023 the crime stat’s for NZ’s major cities. Between 2017 and 2022. March 2017 Auckland City 87,971   per year – 2023 to approx..,  110,000 this year already. March 2017 Wellington City 9,800 per annum – 2023 =12,290 per year. Christchurch City  March 2017 =25,547 per year increased in  2023 to 35,941 per year. Businesses are  anxious and concerned many continuing to report they do not feel safe. As for the Labour’s  Govt’s Gun Buy Back Scheme, that’s shot them in the foot so to speak, another failure. The shootings, stabbings, ram-raids have all increased.  Law abiding citizens register their guns, crim’s, gangs do not. Another UN global directive- disarm law abiding citizens.

Law abiding citizens, Conservative and Christians, no matter what race, those that oppose the Socialist Left woke political narratives have been assassinated by the government paid off media as ‘White Supremacists’. “How dare you be a conspiracy theorist, an anti vaxer”, using this to shut voices down, to divide the nation, to silence voices- Silence is Consent’.

It appears those political cronies do not need our consent, they just mandate the population to under human guineapig trails. “Go to Mcdonalds and get a Free Happy Meal with your next jab”- The very unhealthy MacJabber Burger with a free coke full of sugar, giving the message “look after health, your immune system have a McJabber and Coke Happy Meal..Coca Cola’s profit for 12 months ending June 30th 2023 was $25.832 Billion a 6.15% increase over a year. Coca Cola facing a lawsuit for plastic pollution from the Earth Island Institute and Plastic Pollution Coalition. However Coca Cola reports the UN SDGs Agenda 2030 are championed as an important framework  for collective action

What are the SDG Plans of the UN/WEF Partnership Global Governance?  A global registry of policies, commitments, multistakeholder partnerships (Corporate Capture) with governments. UN/WEF support accelerate UN Agenda 2030. All governments are encouraged to register their policies to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030 (Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age

Corporate Capture globally, regionally, nationally increasing the price of goods and services, increasing payouts to shareholder. Lining the pockets of the ultra rich, forcing more millions into poverty. (What does SDG 1 look like now?) The FAO (UN) is in Rome, they monitor the worlds food supply report food security and poverty. FOA have reported that 95 food and energy corporations have doubled their profits made shareholder much wealthier. 1.7 Billion workers live in countries where inflation not outpaces wages. This has not just happened, it’s been happening for decades, the global system is totally rigged and corrupt favours the most wealthiest on the planet.

In New Zealand parliamentarians do not publicize that they are selling off assets that belong to All New Zealanders- these are called ‘Crown Enterprises’ will not publicize that the people of New Zealand own Crown Assets under Crown Enterprises, they belong to you namely a non-government party. The Government’s role is to ensure that NZ Assets are retained in ‘public ownership’. The Government has sold many of those assets that ALL the people of NZ own. They have robbed the people blind.

If you are being seriously effected by the much higher cost of living, or you need another car, or house maintenance etc., Or you maybe a business that needs more finance so you are able to survive, or a farmers who is seriously affected by the govts restrictions, so you may well apply to the bank for a loan. Your carbon footprint will be scrutinized by a somewhat similar system as the ‘Chinese Social Credit System’. Compliancy will get the loan, non-compliancy will not, you will be seen as a credit risk. The Global Elite with their mansions by the sea, leaders of governments, corporations travelling around the world multiple times in one year. Yes they try to cause anguish through main stream reporting and legislations to stop the rising seas, measure your carbon footprint. However the worlds 60 biggest banks have provided $4.6 trillion in financing for fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement in 2015. Yet they scrutinize ethical mortgages, ethical savings account, ethical bank accounts, ethical cash . The greedy rich banks that crippled the world economy. Yes the greedy banking morons with their climate and financial risk insanity. Mortgage lenders that cash in on peoples misery.

The role of Greed and Fear and the hiking of interest rates, do they care about you, families and communities ? HELL NO. Do they care about those in poverty? Hell NO. The International Bank of Settlements control all the worlds money. Does it care about the world’s children living in poverty ? Hell NO. Banks are like greedy ugly moths that eat through your savings, eat your standard of living and eat your future away. This is a global, regional, national recession in pursuit of benefiting the already wealthy. Winston Peters interview on You Tube.. the country is $40 billion more dollars in debt. A debt left to you, your children and your children   SDG 1 Agenda 2030. End ALL Poverty everywhere HELL NO.

Crises-Fear-Silenced and Controlled ‘Agenda 2030 Corporate Capture of ALL UN Nations States. Multi-stakeholder Capitalism. SDG 1 Agenda 2030 End Poverty in ALL its forms everywhere, equates to ‘ redistribute wealth and resources’ to make the super rich wealthier, the middle class much poorer. “You will be happy and own nothing”. 7th April 2022 the World Economic Forum  Website includes the chart from the World Inequality Lab’ of global income and wealth inequality. Showing the richest 10% of the worlds population own 76% of wealth globally whereas the poorest half own just a sliver. Then adds -STEP UP THE VACCINES.

Global Citizen reports “New study reveals Immunization could put an end to poverty” 13/2/2018 Harvard Institute. Playing as vital role will help 24 million people from falling into poverty by 2030 (Agenda 2030 (UN) Funded by Melinda & Bill Gates Foundation.(Red Flag). Gates fund the pandemic Preparedness 12/5/2022 commits US $125 million to end one pandemic and prevent the next it is reported by the Gates Foundation itself. Bill Gates net wealth $110 billion. Bill Gates best investment reports CNBC News turned his $10 billion into $200 billion (23/1/2019) A return on his vaccine investments.

The ‘Billionaire Boom’ Boom time increases wealth of America’s richest billionaires. Washington Post March 12th 2021 Six Tech Titans made more than US $360 billion from March 2020 to March 2021. Its reported 8th February 2022 “the richest people in the world got even richer and more people fell into the poverty trap. The wealth gap is killing the poor.

This is the obsessional SDG pushing, ramming it down our throats, destroying small businesses, that may never recuperate again, people struggling to pay for basic items necessary to exist. The worlds richest have doubled their fortunes since the pandemic began whilst the world income of 99% of humanity are much worse off as a result of the Pandemic. The Non-binding Agenda 2030 (UN) was adopted in September 2015. The majority of the population did not know and many are still unaware that this was and is still happening,  this massive transformational shift actioned by NZ’s MP’s in Parliament, therefore ‘Silence remains Consent’.

The people did not vote MPs into Parliament to destroy our economy, punish our people, mandate them out of jobs. Publicly crucify them through the mainstream media because they refuse to take part in a global experiment. UN Envision 2030 Eradicate extreme poverty for ALL people everywhere. Extreme poverty measured at living on less than $1.25 per day.

New Zealander should be outrages at what  destruction these parliamentarians have done to New Zealand. The people of NZ did not vote in prior referendums, or elections to be aggressively controlled by outside interference of corporate capitalism. I for one, an done.. enough is enough. Surely all others have had enough. The Governments initiative, their goal, their purpose is to destroy NZ’s free market economy, free market enterprise and replace it with UN/WEF Multistakeholder Corporatization ‘Corporate Capture. Free market economy is ‘your freedom to choose’. Stakeholder Corporate Capitalism ‘your freedom is seriously, severely at stake’. I will not believe that the people of NZ voted for our Sovereign Nation to be  harshly aggressively ruled by a one world governance. All these parliamentarians need to be gone, enough is enough. New Zealand has become a dangerous place for children, families for all ages. UN Agenda 2030- everyone, everywhere at every age- leave no-one behind.

Stats NZ will report that Poverty in NZ is unchanged (Stats NZ Govt Dept). Govt paid off Mainstream media will confirm this. As does Jan Tinetti’s Beehive speech 22/3/2022. STATS NZ are caught out ‘No inclusion of the most vulnerable families’ (Child In  The City .Org). The 9,000 households questioned in the survey, there were almost no inclusion of some of the most vulnerable families. The Govt’s Advisory Group February 2019 report made 42 recommendations on how the govt could change child poverty rates, not one of them have been implemented.  The Government uses Agenda 2030 Indicators to measure poverty. NZ Labour reports more than 60,000 kids lifted out of poverty.  Business and Economic Research Ltd 4/4/2023 Thousands of children in NZ still living in financial, material hardship (Ardern’s ‘Child Poverty Reduction Act). Again another miserable  FAILURE. Stats NZ estimate child poverty stats

Ministry of Social Development (Govt) report New Zealand Poverty Project’s method of establishing a poverty line using focus groups to establish a consensual-based poverty measure. Rubbish in and rubbish out. They are lying, we know they are lying, you know, that they know, that we know they are lying. SDG 1. UN AGENDA 2030 Communist De-Growth. With high inflation rates, increased cost of loans, mortgages, rents, basic necessities in life, you don’t have to be a researcher, an academic to know that this has significantly negatively affected people, families, children the elderly in NZ. SDG 1. Crises-Fear-Silenced and Controlled ‘Agenda 2030 Corporate Capture of ALL UN Nations States. Multi-stakeholder Capitalism. SDG 1 Agenda 2030 End Poverty in ALL its forms everywhere, equates to ‘ redistribute wealth and resources’ to make the super rich wealthier, the middle class much poorer. ‘You will be happy and own nothing’

AGENDA 2030- SDG 1 ‘COMMUNIST DEGROWTH ‘SUPREME WEALTH AND EXTREME POVERTY IS SIGNIFICANTLY HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME.

I urge people to vote in New Zealand’s General Election whom want morality back, families protected -I say NO to Critical Race Theory and NO to Gender Ideology Theory in the School Curriculum and in the Workplace. Stop this sexually abusing, sexualization of our children NOW. I believe in One Law for One Nation. That our farmers and small businesses must be protected return New Zealand’s economy into a Free market enterprise where there is freedom to choose. Say NO to Multi-stakeholder Corporate Capitalism (Where freedoms are serious threatened

Be Gone Agenda 2030. Be Gone the Undemocratic WTO, the WHO the UN/WEF Globalist Cabal. Do NOT Under-estimate New Zealanders, we have  plenty of farmers that can lend their hand to most things. They can feed our Nation. We have a wealth of Natural Resources, do not let anyone tell you “We need the UN”. We have the ‘Number 8 Wire’ mentality, so lets do it. Surely enough is enough, I certainly have had enough- What about you?  SDG 1 Agenda 2030 Data-Rubbish in and Rubbish Out. Throw it in the rubbish. Step Out Of The Poverty Trap.

Researched By Carol Sakey   WakeUpNZ

LINKS:

https://www.childinthecity.org/2023/03/23/bleak-future-for-children-living-in-poverty-in-new-zealand-report/?gdpr=accept   https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2022/05/gates-foundation-commits-up-to-125-million-covid19-prevent-pandemics

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/karl-stefanovic-unleashes-on-greedy-big-banks-after-rba-rate-rise/news-story/d1367091a8f4ed37c1609c6de5e63d53

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/02/08/1075509346/oxfam-blames-the-rich-for-the-pandemic-plight-of-the-poor-its-a-controversial-cl

https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/financial-crisis-explained-how-greedy-us-banks-crippled-world-economy-118090500388_1.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/12/musk-bezos-zuckerberg-gates-pandemic-profits/

https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/banks-climate-change-environmental-crisis#:~:text=Here%20we%20discuss%20how%20banks,Banking%20on%20Climate%20Chaos%20report.

https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/immunization-to-end-poverty/

https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships

 

 

...

PUTTING THE ‘CON’ IN CONSENSUS AMONG CLIMATE SCIENTISTS

Putting the ‘Con’ in ‘Consensus’ There is no 97% consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues (Appeared in the Financial Post May 2015). It was the lead up to the Paris Climate Summit, there was massive activist pressure in and on all governments to fall in lines with the ‘global warming’ agenda, to accept emission targets which was reported as “could harm our economy”. Governments worldwide, including NZ’s threw out domestic economy under electric vehicles, wind and solar farms, the economy was to be like a train wreckage

It was reported that 97% of scientists agreed with the climate change debate, as it turns out that was a massive lie, it was made up. Climate Activist Bill McKibben claimed there was a consensus that greenhouse gases are a ‘grave danger’. He was challenged, asked where his source of information came from, he promptly withdraw it. Barack Obama US President at the time sent out a tweet claiming ‘97% climate experts believe global warming is ‘real’ man -made and dangerous”, he was referring to a survey that did not even ask that question, he made it up

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50%) of the post 1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. (But does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, its unknown as to how many experts agree with this). And the statement, even if were true, does not imply that we face a crisis requiring massive restructuring of the worldwide economy. In fact, it is consistent with the view that the benefits of fossil fuel use greatly outweigh the climate-related costs. One commonly cited survey asked if carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and human activities contribute to climate change. But these are trivial statements that even many IPCC skeptics agree with. Both statements are inconsistent with the view that climate change is harmless. So there are no policy implications of such surveys, regardless of the level of government.

The most highly cited papers supposedly found 97% of published scientific studies support man-made global warming. But in addition to poor survey methodology, that tabulation is often misrepresented. Most papers show that 66% actually took no position. Of the remaining 34%, at least 33% supported at least a weak human contribution to global warming. OK, so divide 33 by 34 and there you have it 97%, however 33% includes many papers that critique key elements of the IPCC position. There are more recent surveys that shed light on what atmospheric scientists actually think. Bear in mind that on a topic as complex as climate change, a survey is hardly a reliable guide to scientific truth, but if you want to know how many people agree with your view, a survey is the only way to find out.

In 2012 the American Meteorological Society (AMS) surveyed its 7,000 members, receiving 1,862 responses. Of those, only 52% said they think global warming over the 20th century has happened and is mostly man-made (the IPCC position). The remaining 48% either think it happened but natural causes explain at least half of it, or it didn’t happen, or they don’t know. Furthermore, 53% agree that there is conflict among AMS members on the question.

They are liars, there was no 97% consensus on man-made global warming. Half reject the IPCC conclusion, more than half acknowledge that their profession are split on the issue. The Netherlands Environmental Agency published a survey of International Climate Experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, 1868 responses were received. The questions referred only to the post 1950 period. 66% agreed with IPCC that global warming had happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either  did not know or think human influence was not dominant. Again NO 97% Con(Sensus) behind the IPCC

The Netherlands Environmental Agency recently published a survey of international climate experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, and 1868 responses were received, a similar sample and response rate to the AMS survey. In this case the questions referred only to the post-1950 period. 66% agreed with the IPCC that global warming has happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either don’t know or think human influence was not dominant. So again, no 97% consensus behind the IPCC. The Dutch survey that described ‘climate experts’ a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. But the Dutch survey is even more interesting because of the questions it raises about the level of knowledge of the respondents. Although all were described as “climate experts,” a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. Of 46 per cent of the Dutch survey respondents – nearly half – believe the warming trend has stayed the same or increased. And only 25 per cent agreed that global warming has been less than projected over the past 15 to 20 years, even though the IPCC reported that 111 out of 114 model projections overestimated warming since 1998. ¾ of the respondents disagreed, or strongly disagreed with the statement “Climate is chaotic and and stated it cannot be predicted.”

The  IPCC said in its 2003 report: “In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore “the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” There are unresolved discrepancies between models, observations regarding issues like warming in the tropical troposphere and overall climate sensitivity, and Natural Climate variability. Its much too difficult to realistically climate model, simulate clouds. Clouds are an enormous influence in Climate Assessments, conclusions.

Lots of people get called ‘Climate Experts’ and they appear to contribute to the appearance of ‘consensus’, without necessarily even be knowledgeable about the core issues. A massive consensus by the misinformed really is NOT a Consensus.. It’s a big Fat Lie. Its worth nothing of any value. The phony claim of 97% consensus is mere political rhetoric aimed at stifling debate and intimidating people into silence. The Barack Obama’s website (barackobama.com) says “97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and man-made … People I urge you to call out all these political corrupt propagandists that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington.

They laugh at you if you dare to publicly debate, discuss this Global Warming Agenda. They derail, shut people down. They even shut the real scientists down. This is not real science, this is about controlling populations worldwide into smart cities, to eat bugs and plant foods. To destroy farming communities, small businesses.This is Corporate Capture world wide, the profiteers are those that are the DAVOS Crowd. The WEF and the UN. The WEF representing the Multistakeholder Corporations. The UN with their International Rules. Like hand in glove WEF and UN official partnership agreement 13th June 2019.. The United Nations implements their one world global governance rules and regulations worldwide to be adopted by UN State’s (Includes New Zealand) and the Corporations are deployed worldwide to accelerate the Global One World Governance Agenda to enslave populations worldwide.  UN Agenda 2030. Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age.

Those political cronies that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington with their political policing are determining that the people have no voice to call them out on their corruption and lies. I urge you do not remain silent stand up, the more you speak up publically the easier it gets. It may seem uncomfortable, you may feel nervous at first but the more you do this, the more courage you get, the more empowered you are. Remember Silence is the CON in CONSENT.

God Save New Zealand.

Link:  https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues

 

 

 

...