Auckland University Website published on 27^th May 2021 that Auckland Scientists are to lead the largest ever vaccine monitoring study . A Global Collaboration in New Zealand that will access the safety of COVID-19 vaccine on a massive scale. (yes New Zealanders were the massive guineapigs that were being monitored. The Global Vaccine  Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) with its 21 partners in 17 countries were awarded funds by the CDC to monitor 300 million people for vax side effects. Dr Fran Priddy was the Clinical Director of the Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo

Dr Fran Priddy stated “ Post-approval monitoring of vaccine safety is critical for COVID-19 vaccines which will be administered rapidly to populations including children and immunocompromised people across the globe. We have already seen how strong monitoring systems in the US and Europe have identified rare adverse events and led to rapid changes in vaccine policy. That the global vaccine monitoring capacity of the Global Data Network Program is critical because it links safety data across many more countries and populations than any individual country could do alone. And it allows countries with less capacity to participate in a rigorous monitoring program. The GVDN’s very large and coordinated database can more accurately and rapidly detect and understand safety issues, which will benefit us all.

This article also reads: Conflict of interest statement: Dr Priddy is Clinical Director of the Government-funded Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo, a partnership between the Malaghan Institute, the University of Otago and Victoria University of Wellington

She was also asked “How did this project arise? Associate Professor Helen Petousis -Harris, the Co-Director of the Global Vaccine Data Network, vacinologist, University of Auckland made the following comment as to ‘What will the Global Vaccine Data Network do? The response was “The GVDN will facilitate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness using health data from diverse populations around the world. Serious adverse events following vaccination are extremely rare, so scientists need to study very large populations.”

A global collaboration helmed in New Zealand will help assess the safety of COVID-19 vaccines on a massive scale.

The Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN), with its 21 partners in 17 countries, has been awarded funds by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor 300 million people for vaccine side-effects.

The SMC asked independent experts and the project’s co-director to comment on the research. 

Dr Fran Priddy, Clinical Director Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo: “Post-approval monitoring of vaccine safety is critical for COVID-19 vaccines which will be administered rapidly to populations including children and immunocompromised people across the globe. We have already seen how strong monitoring systems in the US and Europe have identified rare adverse events and led to rapid changes in vaccine policy.

“The global vaccine monitoring capacity of the Global Vaccine Data Network program is critical because it links safety data across many more countries and populations than any individual country could do alone. And it allows countries with less capacity to participate in a rigorous monitoring program. The GVDN’s very large and coordinated database can more accurately and rapidly detect and understand safety issues, which will benefit us all. “This knowledge is key to vaccine safety and acceptance to improve vaccination rates and control the pandemic. It is encouraging to see that the US CDC recognizes and supports the need for a global approach and that Dr. Petousis-Harris and her team at University of Auckland have been selected to lead this program.” Conflict of interest statement: Dr Priddy is Clinical Director of the Government-funded Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo, a partnership between the Malaghan Institute, the University of Otago and Victoria University of Wellington.

Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris, Co-Director, Global Vaccine Data Network; and vaccinologist, University of Auckland referred to facilitating studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness.  But did the government say these jabs were safe and effective. Why would you have do this massive study to monitor safety when the jab is already being rolled out. Come on people, wake up to NZ the Guineapig State and funded by the CDC

What will the Global Vaccine Data Network do? “The GVDN will facilitate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness using health data from diverse populations around the world. Serious adverse events following vaccination are extremely rare, so scientists need to study very large populations.”

How did this project arise? “Scientists saw a need for increased collaboration on vaccine monitoring even before Covid-19 struck. Modern computing power and statistical techniques make it technically possible to do massive studies. The Gates Foundation funded an initial meeting in France in 2019, which laid the groundwork for the project now unfolding.”

What regions are represented? “Countries across Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa and Western Pacific are represented. Partner sites can be research institutions, universities or hospitals. Some countries have multiple sites. The aim is to add even more countries and sites.”

How was the figure of around 300 million people being monitored arrived at? “It is an estimate based on the number of people each site is working with. Some sites are monitoring just a portion of the country’s population while others like the New Zealand site will monitor the entire population. It is also anticipated that new sites will join the collaboration.”

How will monitoring work? “The GVDN will undertake a number of critical activities associated with Covid-19 vaccines. Firstly, it will establish the normal background rates of a range of medical conditions of special interest. It will then assess if more cases of various medical conditions arise after vaccination than might normally be expected. The network will also compare the outcomes of different vaccines, scan for potential unexpected events and perform studies that compare vaccinated people with unvaccinated people. These are all things that are normally done in many countries. What makes the GVDN different is that by using the same methods at all partner sites, we can essentially do the biggest vaccine studies ever undertaken.”

Does monitoring imply scientists are worried about the safety of these vaccines? “No. Vaccines have been tested in clinical studies and are now being closely monitored as we use them. Covid-19 vaccines are helping populations around the world to avoid untold suffering and death and to start coming out of long lockdowns. Serious adverse reactions are extremely rare.”

Is this project just about Covid-19? “The funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is specifically for Covid-19 related work but the GVDN is set up to co-ordinate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness for any vaccine. It aims to do similar global studies on other vaccines in the future.”

Dr Petousis-Harris is the co-director of the Global Vaccine Data Network.

LINK:  https://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2021/05/27/auckland-scientists-to-lead-largest-ever-vaccine-monitoring-study-expert-reaction/

RESEARCHER: Carol Sakey

ELEVEN TOUSAND HEALTHWORKERS DID NOT REVEIVE THE JAB IN THE ARM FOR COVID19 EVEN THOUGH MANDATED

On 15 November 2021 all healthcare workers in New Zealand — doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, midwives and the like — were required to have had their first covid Jab. The covid Jab mandate lasted until late September 2022.

Just tonight I learned that over 11,000 workers received “12A Exemptions” during this period from an Official Information Act request to Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand), the health service agency that absorbed the District Health Boards and manages all public health services nationwide.

PROFF OF THE INFORMATION SHARED ABOVE IS FROM A REQUEST FROM ERIKA WHITTOME  FYI #23284. OIA Request HNZ00023978

5^th July 2023  The Official Information Act reads as follows:-

“According to the legislation at the time in 2021, there were operational exemptions 
available for those who were not getting vaccinated against Covid 19. Your website outlines 
the process of applying for an operating exemption under clause 12a

Kindly share: 
How many requests were received? 
How many were approved by the ministry?” 

From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of 478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, covering approximately
11,005 workers.

Please note that it is not possible to provide the exact number of workers that were covered by
SSDs. This is because it was possible for an organization to submit an application to cover more
than one worker.
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html

Dear Prime Minister, Minister of Health, MedSAFE General Manager, Director General of Health, Police Commissioner, major party leaders, President of RNZCGP, Human Rights Commissioner, Ombudsman, Chief Coroner, Chairman of the MCNZ, Chairman of the DCNZ, all Members of Parliament.

Urgent Open Letter on the latest clear proof of multiple modes of harm from the COVID-19 injections. 

Summary of published research from the last 3 months.

Since we last wrote to update you variously on the confirmation and mechanisms of widespread harm from the COVID-19 vaccine products, more research and disclosures have become public, each of which we summarize for you briefly in this letter. It is urgent that you act to cease the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts immediately.

In case you can read no further, an expert symposium has reported this week, based on published peer-reviewed research, that Comirnaty contains, along with heavy DNA contamination, a promoter code from a known cancer-causing virus called SV40. Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines.  We have posted on the broader concerns and very troubling evidence on cancer particularly. Here is one world renowned oncologist describing the harm he sees, and another cancer specialist here.

Of concern, too, many patients have ongoing vaccine spike protein production in their blood after 6 months according to new research from Italy. So much for “all gone in a few days”.

Also, it is clear that the final product is NOT the version that Pfizer submitted to the world’s regulators for approval. Here is the BMJ paper of concern, and an interview with the author, who discusses the substantial changes in production processes, which does make them different products, by any usual standards of medicines regulation.

We note you remain in denial about, or resistant to, the notion of any harm from the jab program, which continues into vulnerable demographics – particularly young adults, children and unborn babies who are all at minimal risk, if any, from COVID-19 infection. There is clear evidence from around the world of mortality harm from the gene products, here for instance and rising proof that early treatments could save lives if doctors who tried to use them hadn’t been threatened and persecuted.

Our prior calls to your integrity, public duty, common sense and self-preservation have failed to stop both the continued hawking of dangerous genetic technologies onto our citizens, and the hiding of the resultant toll of deaths and severe injuries. Irrespective of any efficacy at all (only negative so far) these contaminated jabs contain a witch’s brew of known and unknown substances. There is enormous batch to batch variability with regard to incidence and types of adverse events as we have described previously. That they contain undisclosed ingredients ought to be enough to end this letter here, confident that action would follow. However, denial, wilfull blindness or lazy deference to “government experts” continue to writ large in Wellington.

Ongoing synthetic gene injections into a vulnerable population in the foreknowledge of inevitable deaths and injuries to come is surely a crime (even if protections may be promised to complicit individuals by people in power). The Crimes Act is highly explicit about what constitutes criminal behaviour.

Our multiple letters to you, and ongoing public posts here at NZDSOS, broaden the evidence available so that you cannot claim any statutory protection from having made fair and reasonable decisions on merely limited (government-sanctioned) information.

It is clear that protecting children and pregnant women and their babies, at least, is no longer an ethical bar of interest for some doctors, but we urge you, in the name of humanity, to consider the consequences of your actions here and now, and for future generations to come. Thank you for reading this far.

Risk vs Benefit:- The definitive proof that the risks of modified RNA injections exceed any benefits remains the 2022 paper by Fraiman, Greenland, Cohen, Doshi et al. The ratio is strongly negative. There was documented fraud in the Pfizer approval trial anyway, and more people died in the treatment group than the control group, particularly from heart attacks. If there was a deadly virus and the ‘vaccine’ worked, we would expect to see the opposite.

Negative efficacy:- Deceptive mis-categorisation of vaccine status continues to propagate the widespread untruth that the jabs reduce serious illness, hospitalisations and death. On the contrary, it is the multiple jabs that are bearing the burden of COVID-19 infection, as discussed by computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose.

The Cleveland Clinic study confirms the negative efficacy loud and clear. The “surprising finding” to the researchers was that the more jabs one had, the higher the chances of catching COVID-19 This will be the personal experience or observations of some of you, no doubt. The trial and commentary by an independent data analyst. We have sent you similar findings since the studies started emerging.

Contamination and failure of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)

We have written extensively on the Latypova and Watt disclosures that show the US rollout is owned and operated by the US military, as a prototype countermeasure against a manufactured viral bioweapon. It is unclear what legal pathways exist in New Zealand, however, to suspend GMP, human testing and give civilian agencies both liability protection and irrelevance, as is the situation in the US.

Evidence for high variability in batch toxicity and thus contamination is now absolute, as discussed here by cardiologist and COVID-19 early treatment expert, Dr Peter McCullough.

Bacterial plasmid DNA was expected in tiny amounts from the scaled-up production process, but McKernan et al found very high levels, detailed in the urgent hearing already discussed above. This may be the source of the reverse transcription into the human genome that we have informed you about. Plasmids are, by their nature, certain to integrate into host DNA, including into the microbiome, turning gut bacteria into a potential spike protein factory forever, along with human cells. The same research proved the presence of SV40 virus oncogenic (cancer-causing) genetic code in the synthetic RNA shots. We have posted on all this since May.  This can be for no other purpose than to ensure integration into human DNA. This work has since been validated elsewhere.

By any account, not just that of oncologists, this should justify an investigation. Of course, the latest cancer statistics are unavailable but reports from health workers, patients and death notices give credence to an international cancer tragedy unfolding.

Heart damage: Serious cardiac adverse effects remain a major concern. A new Japanese study published in the top-tier journal Radiology shows that ALL vaccinated people have measurable cardiac stress following injection though they have no warning symptoms. The Swiss study we have discussed before is now published and peer-reviewed. This is also highly alarming and suggests too that almost everyone injected got a degree of heart damage. Actual symptomatic cardiac inflammation was seen in 1 in 35 (2.8%) of these 777 health workers in this study of the 3rd dose. (Swiss Study)

We have reported on similar studies before, eg the Thai teens study showing a 3.5% incidence of myo- or pericarditis in the boys. Yet here this has not justified stopping the rollout. These levels of harm from the jabs, in groups unaffected by severe covid anyway, are beyond any justification, as is your silence. It is simply a lie that covid would be worse than the jabs in these patients, nor is the jab myocarditis mild and self-limiting. Heart muscle cells cannot be replaced once they have died. For instance, 58% of post-jab myocarditis was still present at a year on MRI follow-up, as reported by a Hong Kong Study

We note that the NZ myocarditis study was supposed to be published early this year but now requests for updates on when it will be published are ignored. We continue to wait patiently for its findings. (There is a CDC study similarly being delayed). Far from being “vanishingly rare” the NZ researchers could select from over a thousand cases of post-vaccine cardiac inflammation supplied by MoH.

A recent Italian report documents late relapses in young subjects, with scar formation, which can lead to sudden fatal cardiac arrest, particularly in teens participating in sport, or during sleep. The medical reasons for this are no mystery. Meanwhile, multiple studies do NOT show the virus itself to cause significant myocarditis, as claimed by vaccine promoters. One is discussed by a cardiologist here.

Immune damage:-Repeated injections of the novel spike RNA are damaging immune responses, not just against the ability to clear COVID-19 and provide lasting actual immunity. Research shows multiple jabs cause IgG4 class switching and immune paralysis. This causes a tolerance situation, not just to repeated chronic infections but to cancer cells in the body that the immune system would otherwise destroy..

Computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose discusses IgG4-mediated immune tolerance, failure and fibrosis. Vaccinated children’s immune defense’s against all pathogens have been shown to be defective in a recent paper

Someone has to protect patients (and not from “disinfo doctors”)

Surely you can see the ongoing waves of PCR positivity and the new ‘variants’ escaping vaccine-induced antibodies, despite – our evidence has demonstrated because of –  your claimed 92% vaccination rate? Our Department of Justice advised the government that the jabs had to prevent transmission to justify mandating, but was ignored.

We disagree that the mandates were ever justified at all. They are an offence to human decency and intelligence as well as medical ethics and NZ Bill Of Rights Act. Mandating experimental gene transfer technology for a flu-level illness was never justified, as we have told you repeatedly. The government’s own medical experts advised only one NON-MANDATED jab for children but were rebuffed by Dr Bloomfield, and that the jab would not protect people from infecting each other, as in this, one of many illuminating documents released under OIA requests.

Your lack of oversight (at best) has harmed the nation, causing death. There were 64,800 adverse event reports before CARM stopped formal reporting, over 11,000 of them serious (but 7000 of these ‘went missing’ in the MoH and weren’t recorded on the Medsafe website, per an OIA response).  Hundreds of deaths were reported. The hospitals are overwhelmed, and full of excess vascular, cardiac and neurological cases, according to multiple accounts from staff and patients.

The Medical Council of New Zealand’s (MCNZ) action as political commissars enforcing obedience to anti-ethical dictates has silenced the medical profession’s traditional role as conscientious guardians, allowing an amoral landscape for commercial and political interests to run riot. MCNZ seems to be acting for the Federation of State Medical Boards, a private US pharma-funded corporation, not the NZ public. We have documented this extensively and continue to cry foul. We are in litigation to get this stopped.

The government has changed the Coroners Act which will aid and abet any cover-up and the ongoing silence on the many sudden and unexplained deaths, and tragedies all. No longer must a cause of death be discovered. A thousand-year-old common law principle has been shattered. Are we happy with this, as a society? Not only is death from “unascertained natural causes” deeply unsatisfactory, but it is also a lie in many of these cases. McCullough et al have just shown that properly performed autopsied reveal the jab as the universal cause in most sudden deaths following vaccination. We have written with serious concerns to coroners and pathologists about various suspicious cases, with near universal lack of response.

Rising death rates in vaccinated countries: Edward Dowd is a successful Wall Street data analyst. His recent book Cause Unknown quantifies the rise in death and disability that insurance companies are reporting amongst jabbed people with extensive references, and heart-rending photographs of many young lives lost already.

Rising all cause mortality is reflected in the hard data from government and insurance actuaries around the world e.g. the Euromomo report on elevated child deaths, as well as people in our small connected country dying suddenly.

Ongoing sudden deaths and disabilities continue amongst Kiwis, and many are young. At some point, these deaths will be properly examined and atoned for. The carpet is simply not large enough to conceal the growing pile of bodies being swept under it.  In the meantime circumstantial proof that corrupted and coerced institutions, and the people in them, are complicit in mass harm continues to accrue:

• cessation of regular safety reports by Medsafe;
• inadequate post-death investigations;
• irregularities, conflicts and inconsistencies from bodies like CARM and ISMB;
• refusal or long delays in response from public guardians like the Police, Ombudsman, Health and Disability Commissioner and Human Rights Commissioner;
• dismayed funeral directors speaking out;
• refusal to provide ACC cover for obvious injuries;
• an obedient press that refuses to ask questions or cover the obvious harms and risks from the jabs;
• some brave medical specialists starting to admit that they were mistaken in putting all faith in the wait for a jab, any jab;
• and whistle-blowers from NZ’s health bureaucracy, St. Johns, midwifery, and community health.

All tell the same story of overwhelming sickness and unprecedented rates of all the same illnesses reported to Pfizer as soon as widespread administration of the jabs began – clots, embolisms, strokes, heart attacks and chest pain, neurological syndromes, autoimmune diseases, cancers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The company tried to suppress them, but failed.

Ivermectin just won’t die: Meanwhile, the evidence for early treatments, particularly ivermectin, continues to strengthen. It is summarised here, and here at www.c19early.com, a comparator site of all the evidence for early and late treatments, pharmaceutical and natural. Peru is the latest real-world laboratory proving early treatments are successful, and many lives could have been saved here at home had Pfizer’s contract with the government not forced actual treatments underground. Some doctors were punished for following the highest level 1 evidence supporting ivermectin, a fully approved medicine, while at the same time, an experimental provisionally-approved injection was forced on people, including children and the pregnant. This is on top of the already severe consequences for those who tried to follow the Medicines Act, medical oaths and their consciences in questioning the jab.

Other mandates without informed consent:- Recent changes to the Medicines Act, and pronouncements by the vaccine industry and its partners at the WHO, have set the scene for endless genetically engineered injections to treat anything and everything. Medical regulators are now redefining themselves as facilitators for innovation rather than safety agencies. Is this the direction the public wishes to go, as the Therapeutic Products Act removes not just natural health products, but a wide range of practitioners and modalities that rely on them to help patients?

If any more confirmation were needed that actual health is of little interest to this government, we note the recent confirmation from the US government’s National Toxicology Program that water fluoridation does indeed harm developing brains, as if more research were needed. https://fluoridefree.org.nz  The Ministry of Health has just revealed it has not assessed this significant development as it forces fluoridation on local communities by edict. MoH is facing an injunction from various local communities as we write. The overall meta-analysis results showed a 5 point average reduction in child IQ scores (similar to the harm from lead which got it removed finally from petrol). There is damage to all aspects of brain function, not just intelligence, which will undermine our social and intellectual capital. We urge the complete cessation of adding a known industrial toxicant to the water.

Is there a pattern here?: Most of the world no longer fluoridates but NZ ploughs on, in the same way is it continues to promote covid jabs for all, despite all evidence to the contrary, and as other developed countries scale back their recommendations. If these are not all crimes against humanity we would like an explanation why, and how the identified perpetrators will escape justice.

Some of them are trying to hide behind the WHO, which is making it’s orders compulsory rather than voluntary and removing any deference to human rights and freedoms, and can enforce its edicts on us even before any actual emergency, as part of merely ‘planning or preparing’ for one. We do not doubt future attempts to assault human freedoms on other very dishonest grounds, and note the government’s work potentially to undermine private property rights – the very definition of successful Marxism – under the guise of ‘modelling’ that predicts climate catastrophe for New Zealand’s coastal and low lying areas. We could have our real estate stolen with no recourse to the courts, and be ‘resettled’, no doubt forcibly, to a 15-minute city of the regime’s choosing.

Final appeal to protect the public: Thankfully, the truth will flourish at some point and the people will have their say. Perhaps they are already, with dramatically declining appetite for endless shots with zero clinical or even rational basis for them. However, you must stop these dangerous injections in view of this further evidence undermining ‘safe and effective’, especially of contamination and carcinogenicity risk. Despite being the eve of a general election, do not leave it to the next parliament to consider. We say that is already too late for many thousands of Kiwis.

Yours sincerely,

The 280+ doctors, dentists and other professionals at NZDSOS, the 50,600 Kiwis who have signed our declaration, and on behalf of everyone in our shared home.

Our posts at NZDSOS.com contain many more references to the above. Any links to commentary articles always link to the original reference.

NOTE VALUABLE LINKS TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION: https://nzdsos.com/2023/10/13/open-letter-to-officials-covid-19-injections/?fbclid=IwAR0AiTuFZjGcXYJ-ZVfpg70sYYilMPoR7JKMqF8cEpamcS2fb1Wd-A4VU98

NZD SOS NZ DOCTORS CONTINUE TO  SPEAK OUT WITH SCIENCE ( 26^th March 2024) and the :- Collapsing Ivermectin Narrative: Frontline Doctors vs. US FDA. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a settlement with three frontline doctors whose foremost interest is successful patient outcomes. The three doctors who brought a case against the FDA for interfering in the doctor-patient relationship, and for overstepping its authority are celebrating a victory. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”.. The doctors at NZDSOS have also been pointing out ‘the government in the consultation room’ and advocating for doctors to be able to be doctors and have informed discussions with their patients, so they can make their own personal decisions.

In 2021, the FDA discouraged use of ivermectin to the extent of engaging in a propaganda campaign, most famously this tweet on 21 August 2021, linked to this consumer update expressing concern about “a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. As well as their social media campaign, the FDA sent a letter to the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Pharmacy in December 2021 to claim that use of ivermectin in prevention or treatment of Covid “may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19.“.

This apparent attempt to regulate its use directly contradicts the legal right of physicians to use any FDA-approved (Medsafe-approved in NZ) drug for “off-label prescribing”, meaning to treat conditions which the drug was not officially approved for. Because many drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, off-label prescribing is used in around one third of all treatment prescriptions. It seems the reason for the suppression of the use of ivermectin was to pave the way for the vaccines.  An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the injections was not possible in the US if an effective treatment was available.

In New Zealand, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, issued a similar warning to its members on 3 Sept 2021.“Off-label use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 is strongly not recommended.” Medsafe issued an Alert on 6 Sept 2021 which included the comment: “Ivermectin is NOT APPROVED to prevent or treat COVID-19, which means that Medsafe has not assessed the safety and efficacy for this use. Inappropriate use of ivermectin can be dangerous.”

The Pharmacy Council NZ issued a notice in Oct 2021 with advice to pharmacists referencing the Medsafe statement and the RNZCGP.  This encouraged pharmacists to report (dob in) doctors who were prescribing this safe medication. “Current evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.  Ivermectin, particularly when used at high doses, has the potential to cause adverse effects including: severe nausea, vomiting, and neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

“If a pharmacist has concerns regarding the competence or conduct of a prescriber, they may make a notification to the registrar of the relevant responsible authority.” Represented by legal counsel with a history of litigating against federal and regulatory agencies for wrongdoing, the three frontline physicians – Dr Robert Apter, Dr Mary Talley Bowden and Dr Paul Marik filed a lawsuit against the FDA. The legal argument revolved around the FDA practicing medicine by recommending against ivermectin for COVID-19 when they had not collected evidence to determine whether ivermectin was safe and effective for this purpose.

The doctors also alleged that the FDA was exceeding its authority by attempting to set medical standards which impacted the rights of clinicians to prescribe off-label. The role of the FDA is to assess safety and efficacy of medicines and approve them if appropriate.  It is not the FDA’s role to regulate their use once approved. (summary by Dr Pierre Kory),. When the lawsuit was initially filed, the FDA successfully moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that it cannot be sued because it has “sovereign immunity.”  Legal counsel for the doctors immediately appealed using the argument of ultra vires, which describes an official acting outside their authority. The Appeals Court judge ruled that the case could proceed and the FDA finally settled out of court with the plaintiffs (doctors).  The FDA now must remove all posted or published advice recommending against the use of ivermectin for Covid-19.

Dr Kory is of the opinion that the FDA closed on settlement rather than pursuing the legal case, because the entire PR campaign against ivermectin was devised and executed by a PR firm working for Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC, and that legal discovery would have caused reputational damage to individuals involved.

Dr Marik said at the FLCCC press briefing after settlement, that “We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’An interesting perspective on the story is that weaponized narratives such as the propaganda against ivermectin, leading to public harm whilst benefiting those in positions of power, establish “narrative scaffolds”. Once false information has solidified a narrative scaffold into place, the truth may be revealed but public opinion is already formed around the scaffold and may never be revised.

Meanwhile NZDSOS and, we trust, our supporters, will continue to work at showing New Zealanders that the ivermectin story is a part of the bigger picture of public-private partnerships between captured regulators such as Medsafe, and the pharmaceutical industry who fund a staggering proportion of the budget of regulators. Dr Scott Jensen from Minnesota, USA responded to the FDA settlement ruling in this video.  Thanks to Coronavirus Plushie for the below excellent montage illustrating the establishment of a weaponized narrative scaffold. We look forward to the day that fraudulent narrators, including Dr Ian Town, Dr Ashley Bloomfield and Sarah Fitt, are held accountable for the harm their actions have caused to New Zealanders

LINK (https://nzdsos.com/2024/03/26/the-collapsing-ivermectin-narrative-frontline-doctors-vs-us-fda/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly-posts)