COALITION PROMISES:-BUT THERE’S NO HALTING THE CANCEL CULTURE ‘ CULTURAL MARXISM’ RACE BASED POLITICS

The Three Party Coalition made a pledge not to advance policies that seek, ascribe to different rights, responsibilities on the base of Race. (Race Based Politics) That ‘Principles’ will be removed from  legislations . After all the Treaty did not create Principles, neither did it create Partnerships. They pledged that all NZrs are equal before the law. (However the University Law Schools are introducing Te Kanga Maori in January 2025 that will be embedded in all aspects of the laws of NZ). And only Iwi can decide how that plays out in the Courts.

The Three Party Coalition Fast Track Bill, a faster pathway through consent processes for major infrastructure projects and to reinstate Local Boby Petition Rights. Now at Select Committee. Includes recommendations to Local Govt as to those that sit on panels, whether this should proceed or not. Section 3. Schedule 3 of the Fast Track Bill stipulates that up to 4 people can be appointed to the local body panel, specifying that 2 of these position include one being appointed by Local Govt and the other nominated by Iwi Authorities.

Hence  the Three Party Coalition already breaking the pledge, commitment the Three Party Coalition made to the NZ People. Additionally Section 7 (1) outlines the skills needed for panel members, with © specifying ‘An understanding of the Treaty Of Waitangi and its ‘Principles’. (The originality of the Treaty did not create Principles) and (d) An understanding of Tikanga Maori and Matauranga Maori. (Again Race Based Ideology- Fascism)

The Local Govt NZ Website still states “Indicating future partners with Iwi. Building the Principles of Te Tiriti O Waitangi, committing to robust partnerships as grounded in direct collaboration with Iwi. A shared vision for the future where Iwi/Maori, Tikanga, values, perspectives are integral to decision making at all local levels. (Captured by the Iwi Elite). Mana Whenua interests represented by 18 Iwi Tribal Authorities. Auckland Council engaging with Mana Whenua Iwi Tribal affiliations. Voice your point of view, and cancel culture will be sure to be afoot. Being called Racist, the blame & shame game often causes self censorship.

Obviously the Three Party Coalition did not consider Cancel Culture, Censorship which  should have been debated at length, instead they are all captured by Woke Leftist DEI. Diversity Equity & Inclusion. Not included will be excluded. (Cancelled out) Those that oppose Iwi/Maori wards  are called Racist, it works most times, and many times individuals, groups will self censor and will continue to allow a privileged Iwi Elite to do whatever they like, when they like and as often as they like.

Lets look at the so called ‘ Social Justice System’ those that are protected under the NZ Human Rights Umbrella- a minority revolutionary movements, individuals, groups  who are determined that their rights are more justified than the majority of New Zealanders rights. Where does this fit in with the ‘All One People Equal Rights under the Laws of NZ? This can only be described as a tyranny of Human Rights which is a dam right travesty of the Treaty Of Waitangi. The fascist economy of the Iwi Elite. The University Law schools in NZ January 2025 introduce Tikanga Maori, embedding it in every category of the law. Iwi have stated they are the only ones that can advise the Judicial on cases involving Tikanga Maori in the courts of Law.

Parliament makes the laws. One Law for All People why is it that the Three Party Coalition has not stopped this? (Race based judicial system. Identity Politics). Tikanga Maori  will be a compulsory subject in the University of Law, Gary Judd Kings Council fronted the Select Committee opposing this compulsory Tikanga (Law/New October 16th 2024 (https://lawnews.nz/treaty-maori/gary-judd-kc-fronts-up-to-select-committee-to-oppose-compulsory-tikanga/) He referred to this as  Judicial Activism. Advancing the Iwi Political agenda for Law Students. Overstepping constitutional boundaries, saying that Tikanga Maori is the first law of NZ and this has been regarded as such

Gary Judd Kings Council (5th August 2023 NZ CPR https://www.nzcpr.com/tikanga-is-not-law/) Explains why Tikanga cannot be the first law of New Zealand – Because “It is not a law” at all. Judges ought to apply the law as the term used in the judicial oath “to well and truly serve His Majesty… according to law…; and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of New Zealand, without fear or favour, affection or ill will….”  Beliefs and principles of a spiritual nature and a way of life  of some people of our nation  are not law. The way of life for some is not part of the law of the land”

Just because the authors of Tikanga Maori says its law, does not mean its law. Calling tikanga something which patently it is not, not only offends reason but undermines the value of what it actually is. Making a falsehood a fundamental part of the description of its nature is not a good way to ensure its survival. I suspect this will become apparent in the fullness of time. Race Based Politics are alive and well. Parliament make laws not judges. Therefore the Three Party Coalition have  not even discussed this important concern publicly.

The referencing of ‘Treaty Principles’ given that the Coalition pledged to their voters that they would remove them from legislations. Public trust sure goes flying out the window when you see that the Coalition does not intend to remove racial privilege. Section 3 of Schedule 3 of the Bill, and Section 7, part (1) (c) and (d), and part (2) – must be removed from this Bill during the Select Committee process, to ensure the Coalition’s commitment to equal rights for all New Zealanders prevails.

And still LGNZ (Local Government NZ) stance is that Iwi should be key players in Maori Ward decisions. Councils saying they make these decisions based on feedback from their community and Iwi Representatives. Auckland Council has 19 Tribal Iwi Representatives. The Council happily accept rate payers money and Central Govt Funding but who actually calls the shots. (Iwi Decision Making under  Government Governance or should I say Corporate Governance) The LGNZ Website “We see ourselves as partners with Iwi. Building on the Principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, committing to established robust partnerships between local government and Iwi/Maori. To ensure these partnerships are grounded in genuine understanding, respect, collaboration by working closely with Iwi/Hapu/Maori Mana Whenua as we foster a shared vision for a future where Maori Tikanga, values, believes, perspectives are integral to decision making at the local level

What changes? Local Government NZ continue to be captured by the Iwi Elite. LGNZ  boast “We have the highest representation of Iwi/Maori elected members in local government ever” . LGNZ Website 4th April 2023 Complete Overreach by Govt on Maori Wards  as the Coalition Govt is removing decision making from councils mandating polls be run on Maori Wards and constituencies alone.  Is it time for a One Vote a One People instead of a Maori and Non Maori  Electoral Roll, surely that’s racist in itself.

Back to the power of Cancel Culture ‘Censorship’ And this time ‘Opposition to ‘Maori Wards’  referencing RNZ Report dated 8th August 2023 ‘Iwi spokes-person questions if councilors ute was shot at over Maori Wards (https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/524490/iwi-spokesperson-questions-if-councillor-s-ute-was-shot-at-over-maori-wards) New Plymouth councilor Murray Chong said a gun was fired at his ute, indicating it was due to his opposition to Māori wards. He abstained as the council voted to retain its Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa Māori Ward. Said he would not be fronting any resistance to a Maori Ward next year because he feared for his safety

Chong said he could not be 100 percent sure the slug-gun attack on his car was related to the Māori ward issue, but threats to himself, his dog and family members he outlined in council on Tuesday coincided with the earlier debate on Māori Wards. “This is essentially as [current] mayor Neil Holdom acknowledged will become a race debate and it won’t be about who are the best elected members to sit at our council it will get dragged back into this Māori versus the wider community sort of debate which is just unfair.” Student Haka’s for pro Maori Wards. The politicizing of children and young people through the Education System

This is a prime example of Cancel Culture, who gets to say what, and who does not, whom gets cancelled out. Or out of fear cancel themselves out, self censorship. This is the modern day political agenda of leftist wokist aggressive oppressive cancelling people out, destroying another persons freedom to express their opinion. “Just call them Racist”. Shaming and blaming identity politics, cultural Marxism. Critical Race Theory. Subset of Critical Race theory ‘Just Critical Theory’.  Its time for the people of NZ to take the freedom of choose out of the hands of Race Based Politics. Stop the political targeting of Councilors, let the people of New Zealand decide. A One Vote for a One Nation of People. Stop the Cancel Culture Now. Stop the Race based Politics. Stop the Iwi Elite. Stop the money being robbed from Taxpayers, ratepayers pockets that pays for this insane shite that causes division, where democracy no longer exists.

NZ Identity politics causes deep divide in our society in New Zealand. There is this re-tribalism, re-story telling, a reimagining of the historical past that is oppressive, and this is about a self obsessed successive government that have allowed this to happen. Prof., Elizabeth Rata has documented how changes have happened, backed by small political and academic elite that were extremely subversive, threatening democracy, they destroy the system within. She referenced those early days when Maori Sovereignty activists heavily influenced by resistance movement from around the world, where revolutionary strategies were adopted in New Zealand. Their ‘Goal’ being “To Take Back New Zealand” this was outlined in a series of inflammatory articles published in the Feminist Magazine ‘Broadsheet’ in 1982

In those early days, radical Maori Sovereignty activists, heavily influenced by resistance movements from around the world, adopted revolutionary strategies for New Zealand. Their goal, ‘to take back the country’, was outlined in a series of inflammatory articles published in the feminist magazine “Broadsheet” in 1982: The aim of Māori sovereignty is… to redesign this country’s institutions from a Māori point of view… This country belongs to Māori. At this stage there is a clear distinction of whom namely Iwi/Maori whom have their figures in the pie.  O’Regan alleges justice, ownership, descent count regardless of race and ethnicity then why are some tribes more relevant than Maori Identity?  Why chuck it into a tribal pot if a smaller pot can be found? In any case the number of pots seems to expand as time goes on and Sir Tipene may be hoisted on his own petard as new tribes hive off from his own. More and more, though, tribes have been discovering that there is money to be made from resource-rich tribal lands. Clearly, though, some tribes benefit more than others from Tribunal decisions, To involve all those people with Maori ancestry would also result in ‘tribal jockeying for the slice of the pie’. (https://www.postcolonialweb.org/nz/maorijlg10.html)

NO Not ALL People With Maori Ancestry Stir The Same Pot. There are many  people whim identify with their Maori and Non Maori ancestry and others that ignore their Non-Maori Ancestry. Their clothing was basic in the extreme and they lived harsh, crude, brutish and mostly brief lives. Maori  Tribal warfare was brutal, slavery existed yet so many of these academics, politicians, activists choose not to acknowledge the benefits that the Europeans brought to these shores. Do not acknowledge those advances, Christianity, Education, Infrastructure, Laws to stop Tribal Warfare.

This is crazy. I immigrated to NZ in early 1960. My father was offered employment in NZ by way of already working for the same company in England. He was Irish my Mother English. Me- half English, half Irish. My affiliation with Ireland (Dublin) and with England runs through my bloodline. However historically the Irish Women, Girls were taken as slaves by the English and shipped off to the America’s. Where they were sold on the Slave Market. The Black Afro American Slave was of more value that the Irish white slaves. In fact the Black Afro American Slaves were the master of the white Irish slaves. Children born out of the Black American African Slaves and Irish women, girl slaves were worth much more money than both the other prior slaves.

I mention this because I do not pursue revenge, or have any animosity towards my English bloodlines because of what they did to my ancestors in England. After all I have English and Irish blood, I cannot imagine going to war with myself, one part of my bloodline fighting the other part of my bloodline. That’s insane, self destructive. Yet this is happening in New Zealand with certain Iwi/Maori  radicals. This really is insanity.

 

WakeUpNZ

Researcher: Cassie

 

...

Other Blog Posts

THE VIRUS FAILS THE TEST

I personally believe the pandemic is a well pre-planned orchestrated global imperial force to reset the world economy, to replace the free-market economy with a multistakeholder Capitalist corporate economy. Think Free-market equalling freedom. Think multistakeholder corporation think e’ all your freedoms are at stake’

The insistence that COVIS19 injections are extremely safe and effective is a massive blatant lie. This lie will cause many, many deaths, more deaths than they allow us to have knowledge of. Where is the evidence base may you ask, try data in and data out- assumptions, predictions, mixed data modelling and biases…follow the money, always follow the money. What are the rewards immense power to control whole populations of people and status and massive wealth.
What is that saying “The emperor truly has no clothes”, however the acceleration to replace the global economy to re-engineer societies behaviour far outweighs any truth

One must surely as if this is a digital theoretical abstraction made on a computer from a genomic database. Data in and Data out is published as COVID19 actually 100% exists

#1 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: The Virus Has Never Been Isolated According to Koch’s Postulates or River’s Postulates that all the evidence below stems from the facts from the so called experts:-
Koch’s postulates are:
1. The micro-organism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
2. The micro-organism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.
River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications of Koch’s postulates.

They are as follows:
1. The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids at the time of disease or in cells showing lesions specific to that disease.
2. The host material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy host (test organism) must be free of any other microorganism.
3. The viral agent obtained from the infected host must produce the specific disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide evidence of infection by inducing the formation of antibodies specific to that agent.
4. Similar material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test organism) must be isolated and capable of transmitting the specific disease to other healthy hosts.
Whichever set of postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test.

...

THE THEORECTICAL VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED

SARS-Cov-2 the Theoretical Virus has never been isolated.
The Spanish Health Journal ‘Salud’ published in November 2020 an interesting article entitled ‘Frauds and falsehoods in the medical field’ exposing the lack of evidence not only from the SARS-COVID-2 but also other historic coronaviruses

Jon Rappoport has concluded a great deal of investigative study exposing the exact same scam blueprint that was played out in 1980’s, with none other than Fauci in charge, when scientists asserted their was a new virus called HIV and it was causing AIDS. Other fake pandemics such as the 1976 swine flu pandemic.
“The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes.

And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”. The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!

In other words what I am reading from this is “you cannot have specific tests for a virus without knowing the components of the virus you are trying to detect. I am no doctor but that’s what I see this as.

The article I refer to states that the components cannot be known without having previously isolated/ purified with the virus. If I am wrong I stand to be corrected by evidence based information by a reliable source of information. It is questionable can the virus ever be isolated? From what I have researched so far is that none of the seven human coronaviruses have actually been isolated, that a large number of fragments of their supposed genomes are found in different areas of the human genome and in genomes of bacteria and archaea.

Explaining archaea from some researched information ‘How do humans use archaea?
“The detected archaea are probably involved in nitrogen turnover on skin, and are capable of lowering the skin pH, supporting the suppression of pathogens,” said Moissl-Eichinger. “Bacteria with the same capacities are already used as skin probiotics, potentially improving skin moisture and reducing body odours

...

THEY LIE, THE ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM COVID-19 HUMAN EXPERIMENTS – WRITTEN EVIDENCE TO UK PARLIAMENT

https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/36788/html/
Supplementary Written Evidence Submitted by Gillian Jamieson
(CLL0114)

Covid vaccines, treatments, mental health and the future

I am extremely concerned about the fact that the novel gene-based Covid vaccines are resulting in deaths, sometimes of quite young people, or causing miscarriages, blindness, neurological symptoms and so on, but that few MPs mention this and Government adverts tell us that vaccines are safe even for pregnant women. It seems that the risk/benefit equation does not add up, especially then the average age of death from Covid is 82.5 years. These are vaccines still in clinical trials and authorised for emergency use only. There should be enough important data on excess deaths to show that there is and has been no emergency.

A distressing example of harm is the death of a healthy young baby at 5 months after being breast fed by a mother vaccinated against Covid. This appears in a US Vaers report.

In fact there is no informed consent. My experience is that the NHS sends out a leaflet saying vaccines are safe and you are invited to a vaccine centre without prior notification of the vaccine to be used, and without your doctor present helping you to decide. In Scotland the patient information leaflet was given to my neighbour, but only when the needle was poised to enter the arm. Few people seem to realise that the vaccine is still in clinical trials.

I have many other concerns about harms caused by Government actions. I will list them under various headings. I see that the Hart Group (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has addressed some of the issues I mention in this bulletin https://www.hartgroup.org/6-may-2021/ and I will refer to this.

Vaccine deaths and adverse effects
The daily rate of vaccine deaths is now higher than Covid deaths. Death figures in the UK for the 2 main vaccines at the links below are 1227 plus 149 miscarriages, the latter figure showing a steep rise.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/983472/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_vaccine_analysis_print.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/983475/COVID-19_vaccine_AstraZeneca_analysis_print.pdf

It is estimated that a maximum of 10% of adverse events are reported via the Yellow Card, which means actual deaths will be about 12,270 and miscarriages about 1490, at a minimum. On the other hand very few of the Covid deaths are likely to have been caused by Covid. They are only designated as “with Covid” based on a highly inaccurate and inappropriate test. Thus vaccine deaths are likely to be vastly higher than actual Covid deaths at present. We are told that vaccines are preventing deaths. We do not know this. The decline in “Covid deaths” could be attributed to changing the Ct value of the PCR test or just because the virus is disappearing or because of pre-acquired natural immunity via T-cells etc.

The facts are that these vaccines were approved for emergency use only. There is now no emergency and they should be withdrawn, especially as clinical trials do not finish until 2023 and as we now have a safe and effective treatment in ivermectin (Hart bulletin) and other drugs and supplements.

A review of ivermectin studies is here: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx
Other treatment includes the use of corticosteroids and antihistamines if symptoms are still present on the 8th day of illness as suggested by Dr. Shakara Chetty here: https://covexit.com/the-8th-day-therapy-for-covid-19/. In the UK this is being followed up by Dr. Chris Newton here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chris-newton-813ab229/detail/recent-activity/shares/

Animal trials for these vaccines are not even complete. It is misleading to say that they do not affect fertility. There is no data for this yet. (Hart) Neither is there any long-term safety data. Neurological effects, for example, may take 3 years to develop. The Astrazeneca blood-clotting issues are now well-known and many younger people have died because of this. There are however other concerns e.g. the spike proteins which the vaccine causes the body to produce, may cause disease in other parts of the body: https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/ and https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-N-1898-0246. At the end of this email is a link to a comprehensive article about the Covid-19 vaccine.

Effect on fertility: as there is no data on this yet (Hart), it is highly misleading of the RCOG to state that ” “We want to reassure women that there is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 vaccines will affect fertility. Claims of any effect of Covid-19 vaccination on fertility are speculative and not supported by any data” . In fact there is no evidence to suggest that it does not affect fertility. In addition one doctor has grave concerns about this: https://www.jennifermargulis.net/halt-covid-vaccine-research-scientist-urges-cdc/

Individual examples of harms and deaths:
1. 12 year old girl in Moderna trial paralysed from waist down etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GKIFgmm7xI
2. Young man has heart attack after Pfizer jab despite healthy cardiovascular system: https://twitter.com/HowardSteen4/status/1388043539108429827
3. Fit and healthy 32-year old man dies after AZ jab: https://twitter.com/GillRaeWalker/status/1388072474491895808m
4. 27 year old man dies after AZ jab: https://twitter.com/robinmonotti2/status/1388381054688546817 (includes link to site for other deaths)
5. Death of fit and healthy woman after 2nd jab: https://twitter.com/RealJoelSmalley/status/1391017188509769733

Plan to vaccinate children and child vaccine deaths
This is covered by Hart. Children are at no risk from Covid and must surely NOT be vaccinated with an experimental, new type of vaccine, with no long-term safety data. Why do teaching unions want this? To protect teachers? Since the vaccine trials were not set up to test the spread of the virus (see table1 here: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037 ) then the union campaign must be based on an irrational belief in the myth of asymptomatic spread, still promoted by Mr Hancock and government adverts. But it has been proven that the Sars-Cov-2 virus is only likely to be spread by those with definite symptoms, aside from the short pre-symptomatic phase. The evidence is here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w and https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4851 and https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-cambridge-study-testing.html

Out of 4000 children vaccinated in the US, 9 died, 7 almost died and 3 were permanently disabled . Many secondary schools have over 2000 pupils, so there would a lot of casualties in one school alone, if children were to be vaccinated. I assume we don’t want this. This data comes from these 2 websites: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographics-trends and https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.

Vaccine adverse effects can transfer to the unvaccinated if they come into close contact with the vaccinated
This is described by Pfizer as occurring through “environmental exposure” to the vaccinated via inhalation or skin contact. This is described here: https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf in Section 8.3.5. Of particular concern to Pfizer is “exposure during pregnancy” (EDP) and this must be reported within 24 hours.

From reports so far, these transferred adverse events seem particularly to cause havoc with female reproductive systems as described at Questions 3 to 5 of this document: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/action-alerts/identifying-post-vaccination-complications-their-causes-an-analysis-of-covid-19-patient-data

Is anyone in the UK following these reports up?

No end in sight
Unfortunately, I am aware that the Government’s intention is to continue fear-mongering using the myth of asymptomatic spread and fear of variants. The proof that Government wishes restrictions, testing and vaccines to continue is
1. that various councils are advertising for Covid Marshalls
2. that the government wants to “normalise testing as part of everyday life” which was part of the job description (now deleted) for an “Interim Head of Asymptomatic Testing Communication”, copied here: https://twitter.com/GillRaeWalker/status/1377364958753615873 and
3. that in April they were also offering a 2 year contract to a Covid advertising contractor. They also continue this social conditioning by allowing leaks from Sage officials on TV and to the press. Surely these people should not be on TV offering their opinions. Any announcements should be made by Government ministers only.

Mental health hypocrisy
Aside from the devastating effects of lockdowns (not Covid) on people’s lives and livelihoods, the emotionally manipulative and misleading advertising and statements from Government have caused this directly. The “case’ and “death” figures have been exaggerated and taken out of context, so that there has NEVER been a balanced presentation of possible dangers from Sars-Cov-2. The Government is therefore only paying lip service to the huge short and long-term mental health problems developing, by talking about funding for it. What they need to do is stop the adverts, stop pointless testing of healthy people and restart normal life without coercive pressures NOW. Coercive pressure includes Covid-status certification. The suppression of the voices of scientists and doctors whose views differ from those of Sage also need to be heard and a mature debate needs to be had.

My position
I will not be having a Covid vaccine, due to the lack of knowledge of long-term effects of this new gene-based technology, because of the low infection fatality rate and because I trust that either my immune system will deal with it or I can use proven treatments such as ivermectin. I do not believe “case” figures, because I know that many positive test results are false positives. I believe asymptomatic spread is rare. I know that far fewer people than 120,000 died FROM Covid. I will not submit to testing unless I have serious symptoms. I do not own a smartphone and never will, so will not be using the various NHS apps. I will never use any sort of medical status certification as I believe it is coercive and divisive. As a result I may never see my mother, brother, 2 sister and 6 nephews again as they live on different continents. This is sad, but I will not bow to coercive pressure.

A few months ago, every MP received a briefing from Drs. Craig, Yeadon, Joel Smalley and Jonathan Engler, in which the confusion over data and the inadequacy of PCR tests was clarified by experts, but MPs took no action. But because of this I have signed the UK Citizens’ Declaration of Freedom and Human Rights, which can be found here: http://ukcitizen2021.org/

Would you please:
Ask the Government to find a uniform system of reporting verified Covid deaths and Vaccine deaths and side effects, so that there can be fair comparisons and accurate figures. The cause of deaths from now on needs to be confirmed and verifiable if we are not to continue in restrictions for years to come. The Yellow Card system needs to be improved and used by all.
Ask the Government to fully investigate treatments for Covid 19, instead of spending money on testing those with no symptoms and rolling out experimental vaccines.
Ask the Government to stop advertising misleading information such as “vaccines are safe” and “1 in 3 people could be spreading the virus”.
Ask the Government to make people fully aware of the risks of taking the vaccine and that clinical trials are not finished, so that there is informed consent.
Ask the Government to encourage diverse scientific contributions to the policy and disband Sage, which contains too many non-medical people.
Ask the Government to lift censorship of dissenting views everywhere – especially on the media and social media, which has recently banned anyone talking about ivermectin.

Please also read this alternative view by Professor (retired) Romeo F. Quijano, Dept. Of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila available here: https://www.academia.edu/45058943/Should_We_Take_the_Vaccine_Against_Covid_19

Gillian Jamieson
6 Burnet Crescent
East Saltoun
EH34 5BZ

...

THE POWER HUNGRY, WEALTHY CLUB OF ROME

THE CLUB OF ROME DOCUMENTS:- ‘The Greenhouse Effect’… “In searching the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would bit the bill…all these dangers are caused by human intervention….the real enemy, then, is humanity itself” ‘The Council of the Club of Rome 1991’

Most influential organizations begin with the meeting of a few like minds. In 1965, Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist, made a speech that proved inspirational to Alexander King, the Scottish Head of Science at the OECD. The two found that they shared a profound concern for the long-term future of humanity and the planet, what they termed the modern ‘predicament of mankind’.

Three years later, King and Peccei convened a meeting of European scientists in Rome. Although this first attempt failed to achieve unity, a core group of like-minded thinkers emerged. Their goal: to advance three core ideas that still define the Club of Rome today: a global and a long-term perspective, and the concept of “problematic”, a cluster of intertwined global problems, be they economic, environmental, political or social.
At the group’s first major gathering in 1970, Jay Forrester, a systems professor at MIT, offered to use computer models he had developed to study the complex problems which concerned the group more rigorously.

An international team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began a study of the implications of unbridled exponential growth. They examined the five basic factors that determine and, in their interactions, ultimately limit growth on this planet – population, agricultural production, non-renewable resource depletion, industrial output and pollution.

The Club of Rome was founded, formed at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy. They described themselves as ‘a group of world citizens sharing a common concern for the future of Humanity.

The Club of Rome consists of current and former Heads of State, UN bureaucrats, high level politician and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, business leaders from around the world

It is the membership of the Club of Rome that has formed a think-tank that provides ‘suggestions to the United Nations that are planned to radicalise the world, transform people, planet for prosperity (profit). The transformation that is going on right before our eyes that relates to COP26, UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030 and IA2030, these are no accidents, nor are they mindless, they have been carefully construed and orchestrated. The Club of Rome think tank have played a huge part in all of this.

The Club Of Rome founded two sibling organizations namely the ‘Club of Budapest’ and the ‘Club of Madrid’, focusing on social and cultural aspects of their agenda also concentrating on the political aspects

The three clubs share many common members and hold joint meetings and conferences, they are ‘all in the one same beast’. The Club of Rome established a network of 33 National Associations. Membership of the main club is limited to 100 individuals at one time.

Al Gore, Maurice Strong are just two of those individuals who are affiliated to the main Club Of Rome through National Associations USACOR, CACOR etc.,
But one must ask who and what is the Club of Rome, it is not some little group of nobody’s or greenie activists or unheard of politicians.
They are senior officials of the UN, current and ex world leaders, founders of environments organizations.

If you research Ann Bressington’s exposure of UN Agenda 21, Club of Rome.

‘The Inconvenient Truth’ Al Gore who led the US delegation to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate Change conference chaired a meeting at the Club of Rome held in Washington DC in 1997

The following are just a few who are members of the Club of Rome:-
Javier Solana, the Secretary General of the ‘Council of the European Union, the representative of EU Foreign Policy and Maurice Strong the former head of the UN Environment Programme and chief advisor to the leader of the UN – Kofi Annan.
Kofi Annan was the Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit and also the co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter and the Kyoto Protocol, also the founder of the Earth Council.

Mikhail Gorbachev the former president of the Soviet Union was a member of the Club of Rome, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation.

Diego Hidalgo an executive member of the Club of Rome with Gorbachev of the Club of Madrid was also the founder and President of the European Council on Foreign Relations in association with George Soros.

Founding member of the Club of Rome and also the president of the ‘Club of Budapest’ is Erwin Lazlo, he also is the chairman of the ‘World Wisdom Council’’.
Anne Ehrlich – Population Biologist is married to Paul Ehrlich, she and hher husband Paul authored many books on human overpopulation
Hassan bin Talal president of the Club of Rome and the president of ‘Arab Thought’ is a member of the UN’s Global Roll of Honour, also a former director of ‘Friends of the Earth’ and the ‘Sierra Club’

Sir Crispin Tickell founder of the World Future Council, named as the United Nations champion of the Earth Forum, a former British Permeant Representative to the UN and permanent Representative to the UN Security Council, also the Chairman of the ‘Gaia Society’.
Sir Crispin Tickell is also the Chairman of the Board of the Climate Institute and a leading British Climate Change Campaigner.

Kofi Annan – former Secretary General of the United Nations. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.
Javier Perez de Cuellar is the former Secretary General of the United Nations.

Gro Harlem Brundtland is the former President of Norway and the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change

Robert Muller is the former Assistant Secretary General of the UN, founder and Chancellor of the UN University of Peace.

The Dalai Lama, the ‘Spiritual Leader’ of Tibet. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Father Berry Thomas a Catholic Priest is one of the leading proponents of deep ecology, eco-spiritualaity and global consciousness.

David Rockefeller is a Club of Rome Executive Member and the former Chairman of Chase, founder of the Trilateral Commission also the executive member of the World Economic Forum.

David Rockefeller donated land on which the United Nations stands.

Stephen Schneider a professor of Biology and Global Change at Stanford was one of the earliest most vocal proponents of man-made global warming, he is also a leader of IPCC Reports.

Bill Clinton the former President of the United States also founder of the Clinton Global Imitative.

Jimmy Carter – former President of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Of course Bill Gates is a member of the Club of Rome. He is the founder of Microsoft, makes his wealth in investing into research that brings him billions of dollars of profit though philanthropy.

Naming a new more members of the Club of Rome including Ted Turners, George Soros, Jimmy Carter, Tony Blair, Deepak Chopra, Desmond Tutu, Henry Kissinger.
Of course there are many more far too many to mention right now, also those associated with Temples of Enlightenment and New Age Spiritual Activists.

George Matthews – Chairman of the Gorbachev Foundation Harlan Cleveland – former Assistant US Secretary of State and NATO Ambassador Barbara Marx Hubbard – President Foundation for Conscious Evolution Betty Williams – Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Marianne Williamson – New Age ‘Spiritual Activist’ and key members of the United Nations and leading professors of Academia. Eco-political and Eco-environmental.

The committee of the Club of Rome include more than 300 members. On the 21st March 2018 the Club of Rome report clled for a new enlightenment stating that is human beings do not fundamentally alter their current lifestyles and the economy planetary boundaries will soon be transgressed.
The bones of UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 were laid out in a series of Club of Rome reports. one of the first being Limits to Growth (1971) this was mainly about ‘overpopulation

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”

This text is taken from the Club of Rome’s 2002 report, Planetary Emergency Plan: Securing a New Deal for People, Nature and Climate.
In that the Great Panic of 2020 (pandemic) is currently dominating the new cycle, don’t think for a minute that radical climate change alarmism has gone away. To the contrary, it is just waiting for the massive funding that will be sprung during the Great Reset

SOURCE: https://www.technocracy.news/club-of-rome-planetary-emergency-plan-declared/

...