THE DANGERS OF THE GENE TECHNOLOGY BILL – WE MUST STAND UP AND CALL A HALT TO THE GENE TECHNOLOGY BILL BEFORE ITS TOO LATE ‘ PROTESTS TOMORROW NZ WIDE. KEEP NEW ZEALAND GE FREE. Make A Stand …

Replaces the 1996 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act. There is a reason why Genetic Engineering has been restricted to Containment Labs- because the potential serious risks if out in the environment. The Govts Health Committee received many thousands of submissions that have voiced serious concerns over the risks if this legislation is passed. Of course the Govt will tell  NZrs the Bill of passed will enable the safe use of Gene Technologies (Gene Editing) . There are most certainly serious risks to those farming crops that are GMO Free and Organic farming of Crops with cross pollination from GMO crops to other crops that are not GMO grown

The Health Select  Committee Review and Consultation Process reported back to Parliament 10th October 2025 recommending the Bill is passed with some amendments. However there is political uncertainty due to the lack of certainty within the current government. The Govts stated goal is to pass the Gene Tech Bill into legislation by the end of this year. If the Bill passes Royal Assent into Legislation NZs good reputation for GE Free and Organic farming could go down the toilet. This could also bring large Agri-tech and Bio-Tech companies to New Zealand, many of them have headquarters overseas, may well see NZ as a golden opportunity for expansion and more profit (An untapped test bed for Genetic Engineering). Eeem well I wonder what negative impact that would have on our Export Sector in NZ. (And the livelihoods of our Farmers and Growers)

Some people (Farmers in NZ) may remember the US Monsanto now Bayer and the genetically engineered Roundup Ready crops that were sold alongside glyphosate herbicide,  with more chemical use and no yield value.  NZ Farmers and Growers have been able to help each other out with seeds, however GE Seeds are patented this is how large seed companies make their big profits.. (Seeds and Fertilizers-herbicides) Only a few major corporations in the world have the world in their hands when it comes to selling seeds on the global markets.

There has been notable  serious opposition to GM Crops – food security- Safety when it comes to the health of Humans and Animals. NZs opposition to Genetic Engineering goes back to the 1970s when there was serious concerns about safety and contamination. In 1996 the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act was passed, creating the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA) to strictly control all Genetic Modification activities

The NZ Royal Commission in year 2000 on Genetic Modification recommended that NZ should Proceed With Caution and Avoid Releasing GE Organisms into the Environment. Then came the very restrictive Containment Labs for GE Research in NZ. In 2014 The High Court ruled that Gene  Modification MUST stay Regulated. (As we must make sure it does stay Regulated. Then came the CornGate Scandal (GM Corn Seeds) that were suspected of contaminating crops in Gisborne and Pukekohe (Hence the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification)

But that wasn’t the end of it because there was also ‘Operation Pacific- Maize grown from imported seeds that tested positive for GE contamination. The containment was destroyed at the cost of $500,000. Just imagine how much more it could have potentially cost NZ when it comes to Health & Safety when it comes to our Food System – Health of Kiwi’s and our Domestic and Farm Animals. The Government cannot promise (guarantee Health & Safety of  the use of Genetic Modification (Genetic Engineering). Once the damage is done and GM cross pollination (contamination) happens the high risk is that it cannot be undone.

Reference to Prof David Williams, he was working on Gene Therapy at UCLA. He warned the farmers about the Gene Tech Bill saying it was based on false assumptions referring to precision and safety (Well documented ‘Off-Target Effects of CRISPR & other Gene Editing Tools) This included chromosomal deletions  & genomic instability). He also warned that loosening NZ laws could wipe out export premiums that farmers receive for GMO Free Livestock and Produce

Williams also warns that loosening New Zealand’s laws could wipe out the export premiums farmers receive for GMO-free livestock and produce. Once released GE Organisms into the environment they cannot be contained (Be recalled). There are no guarantees there will be no mutations in livestock.  We are totally reliant on the Soil for Everything, contaminating  the soil with these organisms is an extremely serious problem when it comes to Health-Safety- Food- Farmers Livelihoods and our Export Market. Let alone the feeding of our own population in NZ. Contaminations incidents have happened in other countries this has been common and very costly. GE Farming involves significant risks economically, environmentally and lets not forget Health Risks

Some of the risks are increased reliance on specific herbicides can lead to superweeds.. Insect resistant crops. Long term ecological impacts OF GE Organisms are not fully understood, therefore carries risks with unforeseeable consequences for the environment. There have been studies  that have raised concerns about the long term effects of consuming GE Foods this includes Liver and Kidney damage, immune system issues and increased risk of tumors

Consumer choice and transparency  and the deregulation of GE may well reduce transparency, making it difficult for consumers to identify, choose NON GE or Organic Products. There are concerns as to mutations in animals. Major concerns fall into the following categories- Environmental * ecological * Economic & Trade * Health-Safety-Social Risks. NZ has a good reputation for its Clean Green Image  this could be undermined by the widespread adoption of GE Farming, lead to lost Export Markets

How are Non GE and Organic Crop and  Non GE  Crop Farmers protected if there crops are contaminated by GE Organisms. There have been instances overseas where farmers with contaminated crops were sued by the patent holding corporation for intellectual property infringement. (Even though this was accidental). Oh yes, this is corporate control. GE Seeds often tie farmers into multinational corporations for seeds and chemical supplies causing a dependency on multinational corporations.

There have been safety studies  where there has been raised concerns about the potential long term effecrs of consuming GE Foods, including Liver & Kidney damade, immune system issues, increased risk of tumors  (Animal Study Research). Another serious concern is the removing of mandatory labeling for certain GE Foods, making it difficult for the consumer to identify GE Products. This limits choice by Non transparency

Will this also lead to the creation of GE Animals  this risks involving invasive procedure, a high rate of developmental; abnormalities, un anticipated welfare issues in cloned offspring. Of course there are ethical concerns when it comes to the manipulation of an organisms genetic makeup including those related to intellectual property (Patenting Life Forms) Playing with Nature… Eeem Those that Control the Food Control The People. (For me the everlasting NO Trust Bio Tech COVID- Experiments-)

NEW ZEALAND WIDE PROTEST TOMORROW.. SATURDAY 29TH NOVEMBER 12- 2PM KEEP NZ GE FREE. …See the Poster on my facebook for locations across NZ.

WakeUpNZ. Researcher Cassie

 

...

TECH Blog Posts View all Categories

THE DANGERS OF THE GENE TECHNOLOGY BILL – WE MUST STAND UP AND CALL A HALT TO THE GENE TECHNOLOGY BILL BEFORE ITS TOO LATE ‘ PROTESTS TOMORROW NZ WIDE. KEEP NEW ZEALAND GE FREE. Make A Stand …

Replaces the 1996 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act. There is a reason why Genetic Engineering has been restricted to Containment Labs- because the potential serious risks if out in the environment. The Govts Health Committee received many thousands of submissions that have voiced serious concerns over the risks if this legislation is passed. Of course the Govt will tell  NZrs the Bill of passed will enable the safe use of Gene Technologies (Gene Editing) . There are most certainly serious risks to those farming crops that are GMO Free and Organic farming of Crops with cross pollination from GMO crops to other crops that are not GMO grown

The Health Select  Committee Review and Consultation Process reported back to Parliament 10th October 2025 recommending the Bill is passed with some amendments. However there is political uncertainty due to the lack of certainty within the current government. The Govts stated goal is to pass the Gene Tech Bill into legislation by the end of this year. If the Bill passes Royal Assent into Legislation NZs good reputation for GE Free and Organic farming could go down the toilet. This could also bring large Agri-tech and Bio-Tech companies to New Zealand, many of them have headquarters overseas, may well see NZ as a golden opportunity for expansion and more profit (An untapped test bed for Genetic Engineering). Eeem well I wonder what negative impact that would have on our Export Sector in NZ. (And the livelihoods of our Farmers and Growers)

Some people (Farmers in NZ) may remember the US Monsanto now Bayer and the genetically engineered Roundup Ready crops that were sold alongside glyphosate herbicide,  with more chemical use and no yield value.  NZ Farmers and Growers have been able to help each other out with seeds, however GE Seeds are patented this is how large seed companies make their big profits.. (Seeds and Fertilizers-herbicides) Only a few major corporations in the world have the world in their hands when it comes to selling seeds on the global markets.

There has been notable  serious opposition to GM Crops – food security- Safety when it comes to the health of Humans and Animals. NZs opposition to Genetic Engineering goes back to the 1970s when there was serious concerns about safety and contamination. In 1996 the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act was passed, creating the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA) to strictly control all Genetic Modification activities

The NZ Royal Commission in year 2000 on Genetic Modification recommended that NZ should Proceed With Caution and Avoid Releasing GE Organisms into the Environment. Then came the very restrictive Containment Labs for GE Research in NZ. In 2014 The High Court ruled that Gene  Modification MUST stay Regulated. (As we must make sure it does stay Regulated. Then came the CornGate Scandal (GM Corn Seeds) that were suspected of contaminating crops in Gisborne and Pukekohe (Hence the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification)

But that wasn’t the end of it because there was also ‘Operation Pacific- Maize grown from imported seeds that tested positive for GE contamination. The containment was destroyed at the cost of $500,000. Just imagine how much more it could have potentially cost NZ when it comes to Health & Safety when it comes to our Food System – Health of Kiwi’s and our Domestic and Farm Animals. The Government cannot promise (guarantee Health & Safety of  the use of Genetic Modification (Genetic Engineering). Once the damage is done and GM cross pollination (contamination) happens the high risk is that it cannot be undone.

Reference to Prof David Williams, he was working on Gene Therapy at UCLA. He warned the farmers about the Gene Tech Bill saying it was based on false assumptions referring to precision and safety (Well documented ‘Off-Target Effects of CRISPR & other Gene Editing Tools) This included chromosomal deletions  & genomic instability). He also warned that loosening NZ laws could wipe out export premiums that farmers receive for GMO Free Livestock and Produce

Williams also warns that loosening New Zealand’s laws could wipe out the export premiums farmers receive for GMO-free livestock and produce. Once released GE Organisms into the environment they cannot be contained (Be recalled). There are no guarantees there will be no mutations in livestock.  We are totally reliant on the Soil for Everything, contaminating  the soil with these organisms is an extremely serious problem when it comes to Health-Safety- Food- Farmers Livelihoods and our Export Market. Let alone the feeding of our own population in NZ. Contaminations incidents have happened in other countries this has been common and very costly. GE Farming involves significant risks economically, environmentally and lets not forget Health Risks

Some of the risks are increased reliance on specific herbicides can lead to superweeds.. Insect resistant crops. Long term ecological impacts OF GE Organisms are not fully understood, therefore carries risks with unforeseeable consequences for the environment. There have been studies  that have raised concerns about the long term effects of consuming GE Foods this includes Liver and Kidney damage, immune system issues and increased risk of tumors

Consumer choice and transparency  and the deregulation of GE may well reduce transparency, making it difficult for consumers to identify, choose NON GE or Organic Products. There are concerns as to mutations in animals. Major concerns fall into the following categories- Environmental * ecological * Economic & Trade * Health-Safety-Social Risks. NZ has a good reputation for its Clean Green Image  this could be undermined by the widespread adoption of GE Farming, lead to lost Export Markets

How are Non GE and Organic Crop and  Non GE  Crop Farmers protected if there crops are contaminated by GE Organisms. There have been instances overseas where farmers with contaminated crops were sued by the patent holding corporation for intellectual property infringement. (Even though this was accidental). Oh yes, this is corporate control. GE Seeds often tie farmers into multinational corporations for seeds and chemical supplies causing a dependency on multinational corporations.

There have been safety studies  where there has been raised concerns about the potential long term effecrs of consuming GE Foods, including Liver & Kidney damade, immune system issues, increased risk of tumors  (Animal Study Research). Another serious concern is the removing of mandatory labeling for certain GE Foods, making it difficult for the consumer to identify GE Products. This limits choice by Non transparency

Will this also lead to the creation of GE Animals  this risks involving invasive procedure, a high rate of developmental; abnormalities, un anticipated welfare issues in cloned offspring. Of course there are ethical concerns when it comes to the manipulation of an organisms genetic makeup including those related to intellectual property (Patenting Life Forms) Playing with Nature… Eeem Those that Control the Food Control The People. (For me the everlasting NO Trust Bio Tech COVID- Experiments-)

NEW ZEALAND WIDE PROTEST TOMORROW.. SATURDAY 29TH NOVEMBER 12- 2PM KEEP NZ GE FREE. …See the Poster on my facebook for locations across NZ.

WakeUpNZ. Researcher Cassie

 

...
Carol Sakey
TECHUncategorized

THE POTENTIAL RISKS OF GENETIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE (1)

THE RISKS POSED ARE AS FOLLOWS:-  

(1) Negative Health effects from new Allergens or Toxins  (1a) Environmental risks like the creation of “superweeds” and resistant pests,   (1b)Reduced biodiversity, and ethical concerns about interfering with nature. (1c) Concerns as to the potential risk as to antibiotic resistance from genetically modified organisms   (1d)(GMOs) and the long-term, unknown consequences of genetic modification on ecosystems and human health.

(2)Health & Safety Concerns:-

(2a)Allergic reactions: Genetic engineering could introduce new allergens into the food supply. 

(2b)Antibiotic resistance: Genes for antibiotic resistance from GM crops could potentially transfer to humans or animals, contributing to antibiotic resistance.

(2c)Unknown long-term effects: The long-term health impacts of consuming GM foods are not fully understood.

(2d)New toxins: Some genetically engineered crops could produce new toxins

(3)Environmental Risks:

(3a)”Superweeds” and “Superbugs”: Herbicide-resistant crops can lead to the development of herbicide-resistant weeds, and crops engineered to produce insecticides can lead to the evolution of pesticide-resistant insects.

(3b)Gene transfer: Genes from GM crops can spread to wild or weedy relatives through cross-pollination, creating new and potentially invasive plants.

(3c)Harm to non-target organisms: Pollen from some GM crops can be toxic to beneficial insects like the monarch butterfly.

(3d)Biodiversity loss: The promotion of monoculture and the spread of GM crops can lead to a reduction in crop biodiversity and impact the resilience of ecosystems.

(3e)Increased chemical use: Despite promises to reduce pesticide use, some GM crop systems can increase the use of chemical herbicides, leading to soil and water degradation.

(4)Ethical and socioeconomic concerns:-

(4a)Interference with nature: Some people have ethical objections to altering the genetic makeup of organisms.

(4b)Dependence on large companies: Genetic engineering can increase the dependence of developing countries on large seed companies, potentially giving them control over food production.

(4c)Loss of genetic diversity: The push for genetically uniform crops can lead to a loss of valuable traditional varieties.

(4d)Unpredictable interactions: Genetically engineered plants could have unforeseen interactions with the environment, potentially becoming invasive and displacing native species.

WakeUpNZ… RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...
Carol Sakey
TECH

-WHAT DOES YOUR SMART TV KNOW ABOUT YOU?

Stopping your Smart TV from harvesting your Personal Data:  A TV is no longer just a device that’s shows you content, it’s a two way mirror allowing the user to be observed in real time by a network of advertiser and data brokers. To gather as much information as possible about your behaviour, interests, preferences and demographics so it can be monetized mainly through targeted advertising, and its difficult to avoid. A study dome by imperial College London found data from a Smart TV and other Smart Devices was sent to Google ad-business and to Netflix, even if people did not have Netflix. Most Apps installed on your Smart TV will be snitching to a large network of advertiser and data brokers. The purpose of this is to gather as much information as possible about your behaviour, interests, preferences and demographics so it can be monetised, mainly through targeted advertising.”. There is no clear cut answer as to what is done with the data, its highly opaque, and is unclear why the data is being harvested and where its being sent.

There is not much difference between TV brands. Manufacturers claim to use your information for “personalisation” and quality of content, but it is common to sell this type of data, anonymised or semi-anonymised, to third parties, advertising companies or streaming services. “After the data has been sold, it is out of the manufacturer’s control,” Using ‘streaming services’ on a Smart TV is another sure-fire way of handing over lots of your personal data. Apps such as Netflix, Amazon, Prime and Now TV tend to claim they only use data for necessary services such as recommendations or credit checks, but this can include data such as device identifiers, geo-location, browser type, email address and payment information. Netflix has powerful recommendations that algorithms fuel by helping users to choose which shows to watch. If you log onto Netflix via your browser you can tweak the privacy settings to limit the data that’s collected and shared, you can opt out of this.

AUTOMATIC CONTENT RECOGNITION (ACR): Is a scary feature when you purchased you TV its usually turned on to default settings this uses analytical techniques to identify videos and audio running on the TV, matching it against a big database to identify whats being played.

ACR: Works on anything played on the TV including DVDs and Blu-rays, CDs and games The viewing of data and habits are shared with manufacturers and ultimately sold to advertiser in order to target you with adds. When your TV is connected to your home router data will include your IP Address and location (Source-Jake Moore. Global Cybersecurity Advisor at a Security Company ‘ESET’). ACR can be used for unsettling profiling, as it has analytical technologies availability, data from facial recognition, sentiment analysis, speech to text & content analysis these can  be gathered to build an in depth picture of an individual user.

Instead of matching content against a list of movies, ACR could in theory be analysed for political position, ethnicity, socio-economics position etc., highly abusive in the wrong hands.

Using the browser on your TV lacks the antivirus and additional security settings built into your smartphone or PC. Cyber attackers can eavesdrop on the browsers traffic and compromise the cookies that manage authentication to online services such as social media accounts or online banking, and impersonate people (Source: Senior Lecturer at De Montford University’s Cyber Security Centre. Leicester)

“Cyber-attackers can eavesdrop on the browser’s traffic and compromise the cookies that manage authentication to online services, such as social media accounts or online banking, and impersonate people,” says Dr Francisco Navarro, a senior lecturer at De Montfort University’s Cyber Security Centre in Leicester.

If you use your smart phone as a TV remote be mindful that connecting to a Smart TV with a mobile will be done via Bluetooth or across the network therefore “if the Smart TV was hacked it might be used to attack your mobile device, the risk is low” (Source: James Griffiths. Co-Founder and Technical Director at Cyber Security Associates) Smart TV’s will collect Data and you cannot stop this from happening altogether

By connecting to the internet you cannot stop the TV from collecting data altogether.  If you dumb your TV down too much it will affect your viewing experience, therefore its important to know say Netflix features, knowing there are some basic measurements you can take to protect yourself from Smart TV spying. Turn off ACR in the settings, disable ‘personalisation, opt-out of all advertising features and cover or disable camera’s and microphones. Make sure your Router is protected by changing the password. Yet there are some basic measures you can take to protect yourself from smart TV spying. Turn off ACR in the settings, disable personalisation, opt out of all advertising features and cover or disable cameras and microphones. You  can improve security by opting out of ‘web tracking’ when its offered and applying software updates as soon as they are available.

How to turn off the Snooping Feature on a Smart TV: On the Home screen, under Settings, scroll down to Privacy. Hover over it, and you’ll see entries for Advertising, Voice, Smart TV Experience and Privacy Policy. Under Advertising you can uncheck Personalize ads to stop getting targeted ads, and reset the advertising ID.

Remember that Smart TV’s collect data about what you watch with a technology called ‘Automatic Content Recognition” or ACR. You cannot stop all data collection without disconnecting the set from the internet, but you can turn off ACR on many models of Smart TVs. Note that Smart TVs may use another name for ‘ACR’ and the controls can be hard to find. Smart TVs are ‘Smart’ you may not be aware of it but your Smart TV knows, shares a lot of information about you.

The streaming apps on your TV set may collect data on you, even if you never sign in. And your Smart TV will also collect information for its manufacturer, possibly including your location which apps open more and more. These companies can also capture voice when you use the mic on a Smart TV Remote, and collect data about you from outside companies

Smart TVs may contain a camera, which can be found on the top edge of the TV. These TVs may also include microphones or collect viewing data. The options to turn off each of these features typically reside in the settings menu. Consumers can find the camera on a Smart TV by looking for a circle where the lens is situated, typically at the top edge of the TV. By putting the camera on the top of the screen, brands ensure that the camera can see the user, who will presumably sit directly in front of the TV.

The Microphone On The Smart TV: May use your voice control to gather more information about you as a viewer. Many brands state that they do not save this information on the server, however someone nefarious can easily hack the microphone as they would a camera.

Most TVs with camera’s do not include an indicator to show the camera is on. Some Smart TVs have a microphone symbol that shows on the TV when its listening, others may have an indicator light. If your TV is listening through the microphone it will typically respond to the users command.

 

RESEARCHED LINKS:  By Carol Sakey.  https://wakeupnz.org

https://www.consumerreports.org/privacy/how-to-turn-off-smart-tv-snooping-features/  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIhKiR39IK0  https://money.cnn.com/2015/02/09/technology/security/samsung-smart-tv-privacy/index.htmlr                                                                                                                   https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/18/you-watch-tv-your-tv-watches-back/

https://www.gadgetreview.com/where-is-the-camera-on-my-smart-tv

Samsung Class Action Lawsuit Says Smart TVs Spy on Consumers

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/29/what-your-smart-tv-knows-about-you-and-how-to-stop-it-harvesting-data

https://www.komando.com/trch-tips/stop-smart-tv-tracking/544540/                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Tutorials point- How to stop your Smart TV from spying on you  https://www.tutorialapoint.com/how-to-stop-your-smart-tv-from-spying-on-you

NOTE: PLEASE CLICK ON IMAGE TO TAKE YOU TO MY VIDEO ON RUMBLE

...
Carol Sakey
TECH

TOP CLASS LAWSUIT AGAINGST SMART TV’s SPY ON CONSUMERS (14th March 2017)

The class  lawsuit was against Samsung Electronic America Inc and Samsung Electronics Co.ltd alleged they secretly recorded consumers private conversations even when their Smart TV was turned off.

The plaintiff was a Joshua Siegal, his complaint was that Samsungs ‘deceptive, misleading, unconscionable practice of routinely, secretly intercepting recording private communications of consumers in their own homes using hidden recording devices inside Smart TVs, then using and transmitting those private conversations to third parties, this was said to be in violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and other various statutes and laws.

It was also alleged Samsung failed to take reasonable steps to protect against unauthorized third parties from gaining access to consumers private conversations. Smart TVs are home entertainment systems capable of responding to voices and gestures

The Samsung Smart TV class action lawsuit also alleges Samsung failed to take reasonable measures to protect against unauthorized third parties from gaining access to consumers’ private conversations.

The complainant had purchased several Samsung Smart TVs which he kept in the living room and bedrooms within his home. He had been unaware that Samsung Smart TV could secretly record and transmit his family’s private conversations and use his personal data to share with third parties or the data could be hacked by third parties. Samsung was accused of inadequate efforts to protect sensitive consumer data.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had already deemed the defendants conduct as misleading and deceptive and it was said:- “Samsung users would not reasonably have anticipated that be using a voice controlled Smart TV their private conversations would be transmitted sometimes to third parties. TV products since January 9th 2012. He asserted claims for violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, negligence, common law fraud, breach of express warranty, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing.

The complainant sought an order requiring Samsung to stop intercepting, recording, transmitting consumers private communications, disgorgement of wrongful obtained profits, restitution, actual damages, punitive damages, attorney fees, costs, pre and post judgement interest and other legal fee’s (Joshua Siegal v Samsung Electronics America US District Court for the District of New Jersey)

RESEARCHED LINKS:  By Carol Sakey.  https://wakeupnz.org

https://www.consumerreports.org/privacy/how-to-turn-off-smart-tv-snooping-features/  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIhKiR39IK0  https://money.cnn.com/2015/02/09/technology/security/samsung-smart-tv-privacy/index.htmlr                                                                                                                   https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/18/you-watch-tv-your-tv-watches-back/

https://www.gadgetreview.com/where-is-the-camera-on-my-smart-tv

Samsung Class Action Lawsuit Says Smart TVs Spy on Consumers

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/29/what-your-smart-tv-knows-about-you-and-how-to-stop-it-harvesting-data

https://www.komando.com/trch-tips/stop-smart-tv-tracking/544540/                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Tutorials point- How to stop your Smart TV from spying on you  https://www.tutorialapoint.com/how-to-stop-your-smart-tv-from-spying-on-you

NOTE: PLEASE CLICK ON IMAGE TO TAKE YOU TO MY VIDEO ON RUMBLE

...