Through social media I cam across a post that referred to a dangerous chemical namely Ethylene Oxide being used in PCR tests as a sterilization agent. This caused me some serious concern, therefore I decided to dig a bit deeper into this chemical namely Ethylene Oxide.

The FDA Is Taking Steps to Move Beyond Ethylene Oxide “Gas” Sterilization. There has been calls to replace Ethylene Oxide because of cancer risks

There’s outrage from exposed communities has federal regulators and device makers seriously rethinking a question that’s been hanging over the sterilization industry for decades: Can ethylene oxide be replaced?

Ethylene oxide is a widely used chemical made in the U.S. by some of the industry’s global giants, including Dow Chemical, Huntsman, Shell and Union Carbide. The main ingredient in automobile antifreeze.

FDA reported they will l continue in its efforts to reduce over-reliance on ethylene oxide for medical device sterilization. Supply issues can lead to shortages of medical devices—and can pose a threat to public health by delaying or disrupting critical care for patients. Mitigating product supply issues and working to prevent patient harm from device shortages are important to the FDA.

November 2019 it was reported that regulators from public health agencies, medical device manufacturers and expert physicians gathered at a 2 day meeting to discuss, address challenges with ethylene oxide, a carcinogenic gas used to sterilize more than 50% of medical devices.

The topic of focus of those at the gathering was “What’s the potential impact of reducing, eliminating or replacing ethylene oxide sterilization on the medical device supply chain, and what can FDA do to prevent shortages of critical devices used by hospitals and other healthcare providers across the country”?

Back in 2019, it was documented that 20 billion to 25 billion devices are sterilized in 2018 using ethylene oxide. FDA issued a warning in October 2019 that without adequate availability of Ethylene Oxide a national shortage of devices will occur.

Clinical Oncology News in the US, May 2nd 2020’s article read ‘Sterilization has beena problem for months- then COVID19 hit’
For months, officials had been warning of a looming shortage in the supply of a gas used in the sterilization of medical equipment (Ethylene Oxide). That the system had now taken another hit and was stressed due to COVID19.

One of the most adopted sterilization processes uses ethylene oxide (EO), a highly reactive, toxic and flammable gas capable of sterilizing at ambient temperature, preserving those medical devices which cannot be exposed to moisture or high temperatures — like the ones made of polymers, plastics or those containing electronic components.

The EO sterilization is assumed to play an important role in the battle against COVID-19, but, due to its intrinsic hazardous nature and carcinogenic effect on human beings, very high attention must be paid on possible residual levels
This position is supported by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which states, “Ethylene oxide is not recommended as a crisis strategy for cleaning filtering facepiece respirators as it may be harmful to the wearer.”

In this scenario, it becomes even more critical to rely on efficient and sensitive testing methods to ensure no residual EO is present on PPE and medical devices in general.

Ethylene Oxide is absorbed by many materials, for this reason, following sterilization the item must undergo aeration to remove any residual. Guidelines have been promoted regarding allowable EO limits for devices that depend on how the device is used, how often, and how long in order to pose a minimal risk to patients in normal product use

Additionally, during the EO sterilization process, it is also possible the formation of 2-chloroethanol (or ethylene chlorohydrin, ECH)2, which is classified as a hazardous substance very toxic by inhalation and skin absorption.
Ethylene Oxide is used for various medical devices including PCR tests to insert deeply into peoples nasal cavaties

Please go to the link in the image above which takes you to my Rumble video for more information on this serious subject.

...

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON MEDSAFE WEBSITE- https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/q-and-a-vaccine-safety.asp

Should I be getting a COVID-19 vaccine while I am pregnant?
Currently, the Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine is the only COVID-19 vaccine available in New Zealand. There is limited data with the use of Comirnaty in pregnant women. Animal studies have not indicated direct or indirect harmful effects in pregnancy, development of the fetus or the newborn (NOTE: DOES NOT DOCUMENT HUMAN STUDIES)

What adverse effects (or events) after vaccination are doctors, nurses, DHB staff, pharmacists required to report to the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM)?
There is no legal requirement for healthcare professionals to report adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs). However, we encourage healthcare professionals to report all AEFIs. Consumers can also report any reactions they experience to medicines and vaccines.
(NOTE: NO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO REPORT ADVERSE EFFECTS)

Are adverse events listed by the vaccine manufacturer in the package inserts and data sheets required to be reported to CARM?
There is no legal requirement to report adverse events. However, we encourage reporting of adverse events listed in the package inserts as well as any event that may be related to vaccination. ( NOTE: NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT )

If a patient has previously had an adverse event to a vaccine, can they receive a COVID-19 vaccine? (NOTE: AGAIN NO DIRECT ANSWER OF YES OR NO).

If a patient has previously had an adverse event to a vaccine, can they receive a COVID-19 vaccine?
Healthcare professionals should refer to the data sheet for information on contraindications to specific vaccines. These are published on our website.
(NOTE : AGAIN DOES NOT ANSWER YES OR NO )

Are the vaccines dangerous for people with previous COVID-19 infection?
The Cominarty clinical trials included people with previous COVID-19 infection. There are no known safety issues for people with previous infection. (NOTE: DOES NOT GIVE ANSWER YES OR NO)

Are the vaccines safe for children?
The Comirnaty vaccine is indicated for use in individuals aged 12 years and older. Clinical trials to assess safety and efficacy in children are ongoing. (NOTE: AGAIN NO YES OR NO ANSWER.. BUT TRIALS ARE STILL ONGOING… AS ARE THE HUMAN EXPERIMENTS ON OUR CHILDREN)

Are the vaccines safe for people with immunodeficiency or autoimmune conditions?
Refer to the vaccine’s Data Sheet or Consumer Medicine Information (CMI). (NOTE: STILL NO..YES OR NO ANSWERS)

What studies have Medsafe done to ensure the vaccine is safe for general use?
Medsafe does not conduct studies. Medsafe reviews the data submitted by the pharmaceutical company, including clinical trial data. (NOTE:- THEY DO NOT DO THEIR OWN TRIALS… NOTHING IS TRANSPARANT)

What is an acceptable number of side effects?
We encourage healthcare professionals and consumers to report any suspected side effect to a COVID-19 vaccine. For this reason, and because so many people will be receiving a vaccine, we expect many side effects to be reported.
Receiving large numbers of reports also indicates that the reporting system is working and easy to use.
Note that the cause of death is investigated and determined by the coroner, not by CARM or Medsafe. See the Coronial Services website (NOTE: DO NOT GIVE AN ANSWER AS TO ACCEPTABLE NUMBER OF SIDE EFFECTS..HOWEVER THEY WILL SEE AND THERE HAVE BEEN MANY MORE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS AND MORTALITIES)
ALSO PLEASE NOTE 5 -6 YEARS BACKLOG WITH INVESTIGATIONS IN CORONERIAL SERVICES.

...

Stuff NZ reported 10th April 2021 that Matthew Tukaka had been residing in Australia had returned three years ago. Tukaka was born in Upper Hutt and evidently his mum and dad were hard working people. He later went to Australia where he worked at the top of the rung for Drake International.

Later he became a key player in the UN Global Compact, he represented Australia on the UN Global Compact Advisory Board. He has continued to promote UN Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Goals publically and privately.

Matthew Tukaki was the United Nations Global Compact’s Australian Representative from 2010 until 2013. … In that same month he was also elected as the chairperson of the United Nations Global Compact’s Local Network Advisory Group; he retired from these roles in November 2013.

Matthew Tukaka, Mark Solomon and Hone Hawira certainly have private business connections.

Tukaka and his followers have deliberately targeted posted on social media scathing remarks about Damien Dement, Brad Fluety, Vinny Eastwood, Kelvyn Alp and Counterspin and Karen Brewer, no doubt my name will be highlighted now as I publish on my website information and a link to a Rumble Video on information pertaining to Tukaka.

Recently Tukaka blamed the above mentioned names, as being alt-right, white supremacists who are responsible for Maori who have taken part in protests across the country opposing the Ardern’s Government narrative which has highlights the deliberate erosion of citizens freedoms and human rights.

Each person is individually unique, they walk in their own shoes, have their own voice, use their own feet to march on. New Zealanders of many cultures including those that have Maori blood running through their veins are marching for this generation and the next one. Their children and grandchildren. We stand together, united we stand in the name of freedom, human dignity. Human Dignity is at the core of all Human Rights Declarations, Acts, Agreements nationally, internationally.

UN Declaration of Rights for Indigenous Peoples and also the 1966

Self-determination denotes the legal right of people to decide their own destiny in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law, arising from customary international law, but also recognized as a general principle of law, and enshrined in a number of international treaties.

It is recognized as a right of all peoples in the first article common to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which both entered into force in 1976. … All peoples have the right to self-determination.

The 1966 United Nations Covenants on Human Rights commences with the phrase “all peoples have the right of self determination”. (NOTE- ALL PEOPLE)

Matthew Tukaka is not happy about Maori protesters waving the Maori Flag doing the Haka and signing waiata’s at protest gatherings, he blames this on white supremacy and alt-right. Why is he so intent on targeting those that love, are loyal to their country… Maori, Non-Maori and this includes many cultures??
The video I have produced will no doubt give you the reason why..

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE IN THE IMAGE THAT SHARES WITH YOU MORE INFORMATION ON MATTHEW TUKAKA

...

The COVID-19 Public Health Response Act was enacted in May 2020, at a very early point in Aotearoa New Zealand’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, nobody knew how long we would be dealing with the pandemic and there were still a lot of unknowns about the virus. This bill aims to update that Act to better reflect developing knowledge of how long the public health response may be necessary, to address the reliance of MIQ on the general law and operational decisions, and to ensure that the empowering and enforcement provisions are suitable for preventing and managing the risk of the outbreak and spread of COVID-19.

What does this bill mean?

Provisions in the bill will make many changes to the existing COVID-19 Public Health Response Act. The legislation:

Extends the time the Act is in effect until May 2023

Increases the maximum fines and fees for infringements (with fees of up to $4000 and fines of up to $12,000 for individuals), and enables new regulations to set a sliding scale of infringement offences

Refines the powers of COVID-19 orders, including by broadening their purpose, incorporating material by reference, and improving delegations
allows for the creation of COVID-19 orders for requisitioning testing consumables and requiring labs doing COVID-19 testing to do so for the national public health response, with appropriate compensation and a disputes appeal process

Expressly recognises the ability of the chief executive of the agency responsible for MIQ (currently the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment) to impose room restrictions on people undertaking isolation or quarantine. For example, the chief executive may allow or disallow people from taking their daily exercise if they deem it necessary to ensure the health and safety of MIQ workers.

The bill also makes several changes to how Managed Isolation and Quarantine (MIQ) works.

It creates a process for making complaints about MIQ, enables the chief executive of the responsible agency to make rules for the day-to-day operation of MIQ facilities
Makes people automatically liable for MIQ charges unless they are exempt, enables MIQ to collect contact details from people undertaking isolation or quarantine to support invoicing for MIQ charges. Shifts provisions regarding the allocation and prioritisation of spaces in MIQ from COVID-19 orders to primary legislation.

The Bill does not change any existing safeguards in the original Act, including the requirements for the House to pass resolutions to continue the Act on a periodic basis, the prerequisites for COVID-19 orders, or the requirement that all COVID-19 orders be consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Who might this bill affect?
The legislation will have an impact on everyone in Aotearoa New Zealand, but may particularly affect:

People seeking to return to NZ
Essential workers
People who provide COVID-19 tests and testing services
The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment

PLEASE NOTE: NOTHING HAS STOPPED NEW RESIDENCY IN NEW ZEALAND … THE GOVERNMENT IMMIGRATION ‘PATH’ PROGRAM… 165,000 NEW NEW ZEALAND RESIDENCIES BY JULY 2022.

...