GENE THERAPY ‘ PFIZER’- ASTRAZENICA- THE NZ NEW GENE THERAPY BILL 2024…

Pfizer adheres to NZ Regulations for Medicines, this includes ‘Gene Therapy’. NZ is focusing on its Gene Technology Regulations to facilitate Research *Development * Manufacture of New Therapies. Pfizer compliancy is bound by NZ Regulations for the Pharmaceutical Industry that covers all aspects of Medicines, including emerging fields eg:- Gene Therapy. With NZ Govt updating its Regulations to make it easier for the Medical Professions, Scientists to develop Gene Therapies including Gene Technology.

NZ Govt moving from a Restrictive System to one that facilitates Research and Access to Treatments. Pfizer’s role is well known as being focused on Gene Therapy Research and Development internationally. Pfizer trials on Gene Therapy would need Medsafe approval for local trials in NZ. Late 2024 early 2025 NZ Govt began over-hauling its Gene Therapy Regulations to replace the 30yr Hazardous Substance and New Organism (HSNO) Act

The new Gene Technology Bill is modeled on Australia’s Gene Technology Act. A new Regulator will be established with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to oversee the field. This will allow for Fast Tracking of Gene Therapies. Hence Pfizer’s most prominent activity to Gene Technology in NZ has been to supply MrNA COVID 19 Jabs, which have received Provisional Approval by MedSafe…(MedSafe is NZs Medicines Regulator)

Alexion is an AstraZeneca subsidiary that acquired a portfolio of pre-clinical Gene Therapies from Pfizer in a Global deal. NZ Researchers are currently conducting clinical trials on Gene Therapies. NZs growing involvement in this field (even prior to the latest Legislative changes). NZs  Worlds First Trials – the Clinical Research Center using CRISPA in NZ. The Malaghan Institute of Medical Research running NZs first CART-Cell Trial- Genetically modifying a patients Immune Cells

Auckland University led Trials on Gene Therapies. Research collaboration in NZ Clinical Research Centers- Universities- Hospitals are already collaborating to accelerate Genetic Research and Advanced treatments using Gene Therapies for companies like Pfizer a Path to Gene Therapies in NZ. Gene Therapies include modification of Plants etc., This is backed majorly by the National and ACT Party. Reported to be a permissive approach to Gene Modification of Risks & Benefits.

Gene Technology involves Plants * Animals  * Humans * Micro-organisms = DNA. Also described as Genetic Engineering or Genetic Modification. GMOs  are organisms that have undergone the process or inherited modification of Genes. Gene Technology from a Technical perspective can involve *Modification * Removal & Multiplication * Relocation of a Gene within an organism- or the Transfer of a Gene from one Species to another

The Genetic Modification of Crops to increase production is reported to improve resistance to environmental conditions (Adaption to Climate Change referring to the Agricultural Industry)  The Gene Technology 1996- 2024 Approach- Gene Technology releasing GMOs into the Environment is heavily restricted under Law- although heavily restricted its still possible with Regulations approval

The primary barrier of using Gene Technology and GMOs in the Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act 1996. Amendments were made in 2000 to incorporate recommendations made by the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification which meant very little changed as far as the Law is concerned. The Law at this present time before new legislation kicks in is:-

A GMO may not be imported * manufactured * developed * field tested or released into the environment other than in accordance with an approval. The  current ACT does not provide a wholesale ban on the release of GMOs outside a Lab setting in NZ. Although it does make it subject to EPA approval. The using GMOs inside Labs  are strictly regulated. GMOs can only be implemented into a developed or tested within a containments facility (A Controlled Lab) approved by the Ministry Of Primary Industries (MPI)

Operated in accordance with MPI and EPA Standards and other legal barriers such as approval from authorities in NZ. The Bio-Security Act 1993 prohibits Importation * Release * Propagation of GMOs that are not approved for Important by the current legislation (HSNO ACT). This is enforced at the Border by MPI

Between the HSNO Act and other Environmental Legislations this has been an area of tension in NZ, as a result Court decisions and some Local Authorities consider they have the power under the Resource Management Act (RMA) 1991 to regulate the use and release GMOs through Policy Statements and Plans. There are Bio-Security hurdles as to the use of Gene Technologies, therapeutic products that are GMOs which are regulated by Medsafe under the Medicine Act 1981. The Human Tissues Act 2008 which contains general prohibition on Trading in Human Tissue * Cells * Blood * Bone Marrow and other Body Parts

Australia’s Hybrid Approach is likely to be adopted in NZ. RMA Restrictions removed and the HSNO Act amended. NZ Regulators will utilize overseas regulations as to its activities. Automatic authorization will be granted for Human Medicine – Regulations for the New Gene Technology is expected to be in place by the end of 2025.. The NZ Omnibus Bill seeks to use Gene Technology in NZ by establishing a new Regulatory regime (Gene Technology Bill 2024)

AstraZeneca- Pfizer $1 Billion Gene Therapy deal with Astrenica’s subsidiary Alexion- a portfolio of pre-clinical Gene Therapy and Technologies from Pfizers deal. Alexions Global Pre-clinical Research is conducted globally. Eg 2019 collaboration with NZ Pharma focusing on discovery, research up to pre clinical stage trials. The Global Pre-clinical Candidate in 2024 is called ZP1000468 developed by Alexion and NZ Pharma prepared for Clinical Trials.

Watch for the partnership announcements as to future collaboration that could lead to new clinical trials in NZ. Alexion has had interactions with NZ Pharmaceutical Regulatory body Pharmac for its approved medicines. 2019 Alexion announced collaboration with Danish BioTech company..NZ to lead certain therapies. NOTE:- Local Clinical Trial Websites.. Research Networks * PCRN * Momentum Clinical Research * Clinical Trials NZ

NZ Gene Therapy Law aims to create opportunities for companies like Pfizer by modernizing regulations similar to Australian Gene Technology Regime. However there are Risk when it comes to Gene Therapies. And Australia does refer to those risks and the consequence involved. Concerns about integrating Vectors. Leading to severe health problems. Long term follow-ups are crucial. There are many uncertainties. Risks and Uncertainties

WakeUpNZ.. RESARCHER: Cassie

...

Health Blog Posts View all Categories

BLOG 37 SUE GREY DANGEROUS TOXIN COVID 19

needle-1
URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING “S PROTEIN” IS A TOXIN

To: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern , Hon David Parker , Hon Andrew Little , Hon Chris Hipkins , , Chris James ,

Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health and Chris

I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended.

It is now clearly established that the S-Protein [spike protein] is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”.

I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people.

I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the S-Protein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.

The combined effect is that the Pfizer jab injects mRNA to take over cells to manufacture the deadly S-Protein toxin and this spread throughout much of the body, manufacturing the S-Protein toxin for days and in some cases many weeks.

This explains why even the limited available research from the two months of study as summarised in the Comirnaty Data Sheet identifies possible harm to many different parts of the body including the heart, blood, brain, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, fainting and dizziness etc.

This is no longer just a shocking experiment. Everyone involved is now on notice of this “injection roulette” which may result in death or serious injury to previously healthy people. The health and safety implications for employers and those who push this jab, are significant.

No post injection death can legitimately be ruled out as being caused or contributed by the injection, at least not without a full coroner’s report. Certainly any post vax stroke, heart attack, other blood disorder, nervous system disorder or even suicide or car accident (known overseas as “vaccidents”) must prima facie be assumed to be caused or contributed to by the jab, at least until a full coroners report is undertaken.

Similarly it is not good enough to claim that our seniors who die post jab were frail and likely to die. Surely if they were that frail they should have been spared from the jab. Anyway, surely “deaths post Jab” should be treated consistently with “deaths post Covid”.

Despite the secretive, flawed and very passive official post jab injury reporting process ( CARM), and as a result of the more active community led follow up, you are already on notice of a number of deaths and life threatening and life changing harm from this injection. The deaths and harm will inevitably continue if there are any further injections. Perhaps initially you had an excuse that you thought the S-Protein was “safe”. However now you are on notice that it is not “safe” by any definition.

Further, although you in privileged position are on notice, many members of the public who you were elected to represent remain deceived by misleading claims in crown propaganda that the jab is “safe and effective”. In these circumstances there can be no “Informed consent”. Each jab without Informed Consent is in breach of the Health and Disability Code and is an assault.

In these circumstances, the ongoing program is surely criminal, and indeed may result in Homicide as defined by the Crimes Act:

158 Homicide defined

Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.

Compare: 1908 No 32 s 173

Anyone who aids, abets or otherwise incites homicide is a party to that homicide.

I note that the Director-General of Health has shared his view in sworn evidence that Covid is the most serious health issue for New Zealand in 100 years.

I invite you all to consider that claim very carefully and critically. Please put Covid in perspective against the many other challenges which we face, including for example heart attacks, strokes, cancer, suicide accidents and diabetes and the nitrate and other contamination of much of our water.

Surely you must agree that the harm is not from “Covid” but from the “Response to Covid”.

The best expert evidence is that the risk from Covid is similar to the risk from influenza. Many experts are now saying that Covid is simply a rebranding of influenza and colds, supported by PCR testing that was never intended as a diagnostic tool. The WHO says that PCR testing should not be used beyond 20-25 cycles. OIA responses indicate that in NZ PCR tests use up to 45 cycles, which simply multiplies any contamination.

Our government is about to enter dangerous new phase if it proceeds to inject more healthy New Zealanders with an injection that experts have established is toxic.

Apart from the direct harm to those who choose, or are bullied to accept this injection, there is considerable peripheral harm. This includes the contamination of our Blood Bank with S-Protein. We can only speculate on the risks for vulnerable people who receive blood contaminated with this toxin.

Please stop and reflect. Please listen to international experts who are independent from Big Pharma and who are not invested in the Covid paradigm.

Please listen to the New Zealand scientific and medical experts who have put their careers and reputations on the line out of extreme concern.

Please correct the misinformation that this injection is “safe and effective” and “approved by Medsafe” when in fact it did not meet the statutory criteria that “benefit exceeds risk”.

There is no imminent health risk from suspending the program. Dr Bloomfield’s sworn evidence was that the risks were mainly financial and reputational.

Please find the courage to challenge whoever is driving this, and any who act on dogma rather than evidence, reason or ethics.

The future of New Zealand depends on your courage to step up and make this critical call for our people.

I urge you to listen, engage and act in the public interest.

Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.

I am happy to assist however I can.

Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSHDipPHI

Co-leader NZ Outdoors Party (https://www.outdoorsparty.co.nz)

academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075

Lawyer Sue Grey to NZ government: Failure to cease Covid vaccination programme may constitute homicide

...

MASKING ALL (Part 3 of 3 Video’s)

Human history is rife with the stories of slavery and freedom.
The claiming of ownership over each other through ideological sanctions or sheer brute force.
A 21st-century scholar of history studying invasions, genocides, ethnic cleansing, slavery, and bonded labour may falsely conclude that the civilized world has moved past these social evils by entering the era of peace treaties, diplomatic ties, and economic warfare. Obviously not so as populations globally are being mandated to wearing masks.

Individual liberty and freedoms are being seriously destroyed as millions of people worldwide march, protest for their freedoms and civil liberties, for autonomous human rights to be returned
Those soldiers, the war dead who fought for our freedoms, sacrificed their lives for us to retain our freedoms. Now we must now demand that these freedoms will not be sacrificed.

The Nuremberg Trials, the Nuremberg Code “Never, never again” Human Dignity will never be destroyed again neither will our unique individual freedoms. The largest criminal court in the world at the Hague turned its back on those millions of people in China that are imprisoned, tortured, forced sterilizations, forced abortions, rapes. The Judicial of The Haque concluded we have no jurisdiction over the evil Communist Chinese Regime
The evil Chinese Communist Regime the best buddy of the leader of the World Health Org.,

The WHO (UN) the dictator of how populations must be treated during epidemics, pandemics and determine what ingredients go into your annual flu shot.

The world has become a dangerous place, not because of the pandemic but because of those that control lobal populations lives, and by those UN Member Governments that praise them and welcome these totalitarian rules into countries such as New Zealand.
The propaganda machine will not report all the law suits against Pfizer. Will not reports the decades some law suits have taken. Ministry Of Health, Jacinda Ardern will not publically talk about Adverse Reactions to COVID-19 Injections, nor about the hazardous dangerous toxins, chemicals in facemasks.

That 85% of facemasks worldwide are manufactured in China and that 70,000 new face mask manufacturing companies have been set up in China, wit no regulations around safety

...

MASKING IT ALL (Part 2 of a 3 part series of Video’s)

The unforeseen risks of Governments, businesses’ mandating facial masks should be questionable as to the risks populations worldwide are facing by wearing these products that may contain hazardous waste, harmful chemicals that we may constantly breathe in.

Masks have become an overwhelming obsessive response as governments worldwide impose populations to other serious risks to their health and wellbeing.
Leading scientists are questioning whether the real risk of exposure to hazardous chemicals from long term mask wearing is actually higher than the risk of coming into contact with Sars-Cov-2.

Nano plastics have been found in disposable masks, harmful pollutants.
What’s even more shocking is that masks were and are well known for possessing aniline, a known carcinogen’
Scientists have discovered that some masks that we believe keep us safe from COD-19 could actually put us in more trouble than we could imagine, as many of these are laced in toxic chemicals.

...

ALL MASKED (Part 1 of a 3 Part series)

The unregulated disposal of toxic chemical facemasks into the environment creating a disease transmission vector

It has been documented that we need to protect animals and wildlife from disposable facemasks
Quebec Health reported that dangerous toxic chemicals have been found in facemasks. https://www.aier.org/article/the-dangers-of-masks. 9th April 2021. Potentially toxic masks distributed in schools and day care centres in Quebec (Health Canada)

Discovered during a preliminary risk assessment that the masks contain microscopic graphene particles that, when inhaled, could cause severe lung damage.”
Many facemasks have been found to be very unsafe can cause unintended adverse effects

For all living beings on this earth we are what we consume, what we breathe as to what consequently effects our overall health and wellbeing, whether this be a living being be a human, animal, mammal, plant or insect

WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND TO THE MEDICAL, POLITICAL TYRANNY

...