Please find below  my opposition to the LEGALLY BINDING  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I have found that the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) “Zero Draft” the new agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, called WHO CA+, is significantly flawed.  Due to the evidence and information provided below I oppose the WHO CA+ Treaty.

(1)WHO failed miserably in preventing the spread of COVID-19, the WHO CA+ draft would dramatically expand WHO authority to declare a pandemic and, thereby, trigger provisions in the treaty that would re-allocate resources and encourage governments to waive intellectual property rights

(2)New Zealand is already playing an active part in planning the WHO CA+ without consultation of the public of New Zealand’s input. The Government have been deliberately non-transparent as to the WHO CA+ and its purposes, aims, goals as to its intention as to the WHO Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(3)The proposed Treaty is due to be introduced at the 77^th World Health Assembly in May 2024.  If New Zealand agrees and are compliant to the WHO CA+ this will risk  further increased significant tax payer payments  as to the allocation  to the added expenditure it will cost our country

(4)The World Health Organization has already miserably failed since the pandemic first evolved on many accounts, yet it appears that members of the New Zealand Government are supporting and even promoting the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(5)The draft of the WHO CA+ clearly focuses on significantly strengthening, expanding the powers of the World Health Organization which I note signed a ‘Partnership Memorandum with the World Economic Forum on 13^th June 2019.

(6)The WHO/ WEF is now  a Public-Private Partnership. The UN was never originally declared as such when it was created.  Obviously through the extraordinary super powers awarded to the WHO would also reward the Multi-stakeholder Corporations that WEF represents., therefore there is a massive conflict of interest that would effectively bring multistakeholder corporations, and those represented by the WEF huge wealth and power in the realms of  global politics and economies. The WEF is the whisperer in the ears of the WHO.

(7)The ZERO draft of the International Pandemic Treaty focuses on hugely expanding the authority, powers of World Health Organization, which give WHO the super powers to trample on ‘intellectual property rights’ and the redistribution of knowledge and technology. The WHO will become the only one, so called source of ‘Truth’, therefore having the ability to shut down the ‘True’ source of Truth., this is very dangerous.

 (8)WHO International Health Regulations 2005 failed miserably when it came to accessing China’s part in the origins of the COVID19 pandemic instead of holding them to account and responsible for their failings under the IHR2005 the WHO now parrots the CCP and even praises the Chinese regime. Therefore cannot be trusted to be such a superior force of authority over all UN Nation States.

 (9)In accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of International Laws the people of New Zealand have the right to self-determine and manage their own autonomous approach to public health. This is a ‘sovereign’ right, the people of New Zealand are the ‘sovereignty who have that right. The global superior authoritative right does not lay with the WHO to control, cause damage to society, business, infrastructure or medical, technical determinations of the people of New Zealand. The people rights in New Zealand are that of ‘self determination’

(10)The people of New Zealand have in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the Principles of International Law the sovereign right to determine, manage their own approach to public health, this notably also means ‘pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems pursuant to the autonomy of domestic policies, legislations. That is provided that within this domestic jurisdiction the control awarded to the state through the vote of the people in New Zealand ‘causes no harm, damage to the peoples of New Zealand’.

‘(11)Sadly I say there has been much damage done to the peoples of New Zealand through the governments misinformation as to the COVID19 immunizations and the mandating of these. The closures of businesses throughout New Zealand and the loss of work and income.  Also the closure of schools where many children have not returned back to school.

(12)The members of  New Zealand House of Representatives have shown themselves to be  non-transparency upon publicly  exposing the serious harms and deaths of post COVID 19 immunizations. The many law abiding decent people of New Zealand have been deliberately abused by members of the New Zealand mainstream news media that has been paid for by the Governments Journalist Fund.

 (13) A member of Parliament namely Michael Wood character assassinating, labelling people those who are grieved through loss of work and income, loss of businesses as a so called ‘River of Filth’. Amongst those people he called a ‘River of Filth’ and ‘Anti -Vaxers’ were those that had been vaxed and were suffering serious harms post immunization.  As noted, not one member of Parliament has apologised for this cruel emotional harm caused to people of New Zealand by members of the House of Representatives. 

(14)The mandating of COVID19 Immunization. The following  term has often been quoted by members of WHO and WEF,  and even members of NZ House of Representatives ‘No-one is safe until everyone is Safe’. Pfizer Chief Executive has publicly admitted that they did not test their COVID19 immunization for transmission prior to entering the global market place.  Evidence has shown us that those that have been injected with the Pfizer mRNA  Injection have still been infected by the virus.. . Obviously the people of New Zealand have been misled when it has come to mandating of COVID19 immunizations and mandates

(15)It is a huge concern that large Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer have and continue to advise the Intergovernmental working group on the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty as to the Zero Draft which is a huge conflict of interest.

(16)It is a deep concern that if the New Zealand Government continues to pursue, support the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) it would give the WHO superior authority over NZ Domestic policies. WHO would have the power to declare a pandemic globally whether New Zealand is affected or not and could have the power to reallocate resources.

(17)The Zero Draft of the WHO CA + Pandemic Treaty makes transparency and cooperation mandatory (legally Binding). Uses the word ‘shall’ when referencing facilitating accessing, sharing of research and genomic data, however there are no repercussions for ‘non-compliance’. It is evidently clear that the WHO and those drafting this treaty , and those that support, promote it have learned nothing. There is no reason to believe that China would be compliant with the obligations set out in the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)  I also note that the  World Health Organizations failure to quietly abandon investigations into China’s incompetence to comply to the legally binding WHO Health Regulations (IHR 2005)

(18)The WHO CA+ Draft lets China off the hook. Despite China having the largest economy in the world the United Nations considers China as a developing country. Developed countries financially support developing countries when it comes to ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ among nations. Developed countries would share the greater costs therefore  China will likely be the beneficiary of the WHO CA+ obligation for developed nation parties, among other provisions.

(19)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty Zero Draft calls on the parties to tackle misleading, misinformation or disinformation. Yet the WHO  themselves have been the source of disinformation when they tweeted  “preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of COVID 19.

I refer to the ‘World Health Organization ‘Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no evidence of human to human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-n CoV) identified in Wuhan Vina. Twitter January 14^th 2020 ¹⁸

^{https://twitter.com/WHO/status​/1217043229427761152} 

(20)As for the CDC on the efficacy of facial mask wearing that shifted over time, when Anthony Fauci defended flip flop accusations after shifting mask guidance, this has reported changed time and time again. There is much controversy about mask wearing. It is clearly evident that many people wear masks as chin straps. Masks do risk emotional, psychological damage to some extent. Mask wearing is not normalised behaviour so will affect people in different ways.  ^{LINK: Independent, July 29, 2021, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fauci-cdc-mask-flip-flop-b1892600.html}

(21)A recent study found that natural immunity acquired by a COVID-19 infection was “associated with lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the variant, than mRNA primary-series vaccination. Yet WHO superior authorities under a legally binding Pandemic Treaty could mandate all populations to be vaccinated, immunized without accountability. This is very dangerous.

LINK:” ^{Hiam Chemaitelly et al., “Protection from Previous Natural Infection Compared with mRNA Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19 in Qatar: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” The Lancet, November 11, 202, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(​22)00287-7/fulltext (accessed February 24, 2023).}

(22)The WHO and UN Member Nation Governments and their  so called experts have been proven wrong far too often, yet the WHO Pandemic Treaty gives WHO the global super power authority to police “disinformation. This seriously infringes on the internationally accepted right to freedom of expression. (UN International  Human Rights and NZ Domestic Human Rights Legislations)

(23)The WHO CA+ Treaty Draft emphasizes ‘Equity’. It is guided by ‘Equity’, which is defined by the absence of unfair, unavoidable or remediable differences among and within countries, including between different groups of people, whether these groups are defined socially, economically, demographically, geographically or references ‘Inequality’. The term ‘Equity’ and ‘Equitable’ appear more that thirty times in the ZERO Draft of the Treaty, however there is no clear definition what this means.

(24)The people of New Zealand have the right to have clear, concise information. (ibid., Art 3,4 (3) ). It is evidential by the ZERO Draft of the WHO CA+ Treaty that it is guided by ‘Equity’, a term that is deeply rooted in ‘Marxist’ ideology and should never be embedded in the guiding principles of any international legally binding commitment of any State, including that of New Zealand.

(25)The ZERO Draft of the CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord- Convention) commits to the term ‘Universal Health Coverage’, this is not clearly defined. I stand to be corrected, but does that mean that the Government provides the peoples of New Zealand health care, is that with or without costs to the peoples of New Zealand, and at what costs must the people of New Zealand pay?. How will this indeed affect tax payers pockets?

(26)Its obvious that if the NZ House of Representatives agree, comply to the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty domestic legislations will have to be amended.  The people of New Zealand are not awarded end decision making rights when it comes to domestic policy making.    I refer to the (Non-Legally Binding Citizens Initiated Referenda), and even if this did become ‘Legally Binding’ the people of New Zealand would have no end decision rights when it comes to Domestic Policies due to the legally binding nature of the WHO CA+ Treaty.. Therefore upon voting for political parties at election time, this means that promises made to the voting public can be over- ridden by the WHO Pandemic Treaty

(27)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty (Accord) incorporates a ‘One Health’ approach framework. This includes ‘Humans, Animals-wild and domestic and all Eco-systems’. This means that the WHO under the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty has massive super superior control over every aspect of life on this planet.

(28)WHO CA+ Treaty under the classification  of ‘Climate Change’ will have the authority to restrict, control food systems, trade and travel, infrastructure, land use and property rights. This is scandalous and extremely dangerous when it comes to the health and wellbeing of New Zealanders.

(29)Those that reside in the NZ House of Representatives are accountable to the people of New Zealand who voted them in to the political positions they hold in the New Zealand House of Representatives. To be responsible and accountable to ALL peoples of New Zealand.  Through researched evidence of viewing speeches in the House and other UN Information that New Zealand Members of Parliament are supporting, promoting and are in agreeance with the WHO ZERO Draft of the CA +.

(30) I also note that at the 77^th gathering of the World Health Assembly the final draft of the CA+ WHO International Pandemic Treaty will be produced, introduced to all UN Member Nation States to determine whether, and which UN Member States agree on the WHO International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(31) I therefore request that the NZ House of Representatives transparently accords the peoples of New Zealand open public debate, discussion without political intrusion as to all knowledge, information that is pertained in every ZERO draft of the WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty as it is produced, introduced.

The draft states that the WHO CA+ “shall be subject to ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by UN Member Nation States, therefore clearly requires advice and consent under the process outlined.^{, “Circular 175 Procedure,” https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/treaty/c175/index.htm (accessed February 24, 2023).}

(32)I conclude that the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) is highly problematic and deeply flawed and would allow the global superior powers of the World Health Organization (UN) to have authority over New Zealand’s domestic policies. One size does not fit ALL and there is no evidence of ‘trustworthiness’ as to why the people of New Zealand should support this WHO Treaty proposal.

(33)The ‘Public-Private’ partnership of the World Economic Forum with the UN is a huge conflict of interest as they are  the ‘whisperers in the ear’ of the UN, therefore also  rewarded global superiority political, economical control through the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) agreeance.

Therefore, for all the above reasons , information provided I totally oppose the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord). I find it to be highly dangerous to the health and wellbeing of ALL peoples of New Zealand. I have cc’d other groups, individuals, organizations, members of parliament the above information-communication t as outlined to the NZ House of Representatives as to opposition of the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I request a response at your earliest. Thank you.

 

Carol Sakey

...

These links are reference to my last two video’s on this subject. 2020-2030 Global Sexualization of children (UN). UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals (SDGs). Documented in the UN Technical Brief of Anti School Bullying in Schools globally Studies and Surveys of schools students

LINK Several approaches were used for questioning students about themselves, in these UN Surveys, studies  March 2019 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

Several approaches were used for questioning students about themselves, in these UN Surveys, studies  March 2019 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

A first example is provided by the 2015 Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance System (YRBS), conducted by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the USA.  Statistically analysed together with a sub-group of bisexual respondents, another subgroup identified ‘Not Sure: of gender.

Youth2000 survey in New Zealand. This is conducted among 9-13 year olds and, since 2012, has included a question about whether students self-identify as transgender. The sample for the most recent survey (2012) involved students being randomly selected from 91 schools that, in turn, were randomly selected from all eligible schools (those with at least 50 students) from across the country.

The resulting sample – of 8,500 respondents – proved large and representative enough for the implementers to find that 1.2% of students identify as transgender – a figure that is significant enough to enable statistical comparisons (Clark, et al., 2013).

UNESCO-supported study in four countries in Southern Africa, questionnaires used in schools referred to gender non-conforming students as ‘people who are seen as different in terms of gender (boys who look or act like girls; girls who look like or act like boys)’.

Auckland University Sample size 28,000. Conducted 2001, 2008, 2012  9-13 yr olds   www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/faculty/adolescent-health-research-group/youth2000-national-youth-health-survey-series.html

Source. http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs Global school-based student health survey Type: School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

Source: Growing up today study 2 Type: Population-based survey. Country: USA. Population: Children of Nurses’ Health Study participants. Age: 10-17 year olds (2004). Sample size: 10,900. Frequency: Annually since 2004. Further information: www.gutsweb.org

https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/nsduh-national-survey-drug-use-and-health

From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=3226

Transgender Age: 14-18 year olds (Grades 9-12). Sample size: Varies. Further information: http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs

Age: 12-18 year olds (Grades 7-12). Sample size: 14,400. Frequency: 1994–2008 (longitudinal). Further information: http://cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth

School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: 2018. Further information:https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

Respondents  were given a  range of gender identity options. EG., whether or not they self-identify as transgender. The following are two examples of best practice questions about gender identity.

Example 2: Question: Do you think you are transgender? This is a girl who feels like she should have been a boy, or a boy who feels like he should have been a girl. (e.g. Trans, Queen, Fa’faffine, Whakawahine, Tangata ira Tane, Genderqueer. New Zealand  www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/faculty/adolescent-health-research-group/youth2000-national-youth-health-survey-series.html

Intersex Human Rights Australia. (2012). Including intersex in research studies and surveys. Retrieved from https://ihra/org.au/20042/ on-requests-for-research/

Kann, L., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Harris, V. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., . . . al, e. (2016). Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts and health-related behaviors among students in Grades 9-12 – United States and Selected Sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ.

Patterson, J. G., Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2017, April 1). Measuring sexual and gender minority populations in health surveillance. LGBT Health, 82-105.

UNESCO. (2015). From insult to inclusion: Asia-Pacific report on school bullying, violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Paris and Bangkok: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2016). Out in the open: Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO.

REFERENCE MADE TO UN AGENDA 2030 SDG 4.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/world-health-organization-removes-gender-dysphoria-from-list-of-mental-illnesses/

: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

. Age: 14-18 year olds (Grades 9-12). Sample size: Varies. Further information: http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs

: School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: 2018. Further information:https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

 

BIOGRAPHY: INCLUDED:-

Australian Government. (2013). Guidelines on the recognition of sex and gender. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia.

Clark, T. F., T., B. P., Crengle, S., Denny, S., Dyson, B., Fortune, S., . . . Rossen, F. (2013). Youth’12 Prevalence Tables: The health and wellbeing of New Zealand secondary school students in 2012. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland

Intersex Human Rights Australia. (2012). Including intersex in research studies and surveys. Retrieved from https://ihra/org.au/20042/ on-requests-for-research/

Kann, L., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Harris, V. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., . . . al, e. (2016). Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts and health-related behaviors among students in Grades 9-12 – United States and Selected Sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ.

Patterson, J. G., Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2017, April 1). Measuring sexual and gender minority populations in health surveillance. LGBT Health, 82-105.

UNESCO. (2015). From insult to inclusion: Asia-Pacific report on school bullying, violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Paris and Bangkok: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2016). Out in the open: Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO.

REFERENCE MADE TO UN AGENDA 2030 SDG 4.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/world-health-organization-removes-gender-dysphoria-from-list-of-mental-illnesses/

29TH May 2019.. video World Health Assembly updated 25th May 2019 ICD-11 updated for 21st Century reflects critical advances in science and medicine. Is reframed as Gender Incongruence NOT Gender Identity Disorder as previous. Is described by a marked incongruence between an individuals experienced/ expressed gender and the assigned sex in pre-pubertal children.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf 20 PAGES

 

 

...

SciTechDaily article publish  3^rd Feb 2023 authored by University of California Jan 2^nd 2022 ‘Grow And Eat Your Own Vaccines’. Using Plants as mRNA Factories. Eating salads could replace the jab in the arm where vegetable, salads could be turned into mRNA factories. Messenger RNA or mRNA technology that’s used in COVID19 jabs. The project was funded by the National Science Foundation USA… Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The DNA containing the mRNA jabs can successfully be delivered into part of the plant cell where it is then replicated. The DNA encoding for the protein is delivered by targeted nano materials, without mechanical aid by applying a droplet of nano formulation to the leaf surface.  The UCRs Dept of Botany & Plant Sciences San Diego  are in collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University. Vegs and salads become not just foods but  edible vaccines without the jab. Nano –materials deliver nitrogen, a fertilizer directly to where the plants most need it. The plant engineering technique will make nanoparticles go to the chloroplast, which  lies within the cells of plants and certain algae- the site of Nano materials deliver nitrogen, a fertilizer directly to which a process where the sun converts the plant into chemical energy for growth.

Sept 22^nd 2022 the ISAAA Global Knowledge Centre of Biotechnology published an article  ‘US Scientists Embark on developing an edible plant based vaccine. Edible plants  mRNA Vaccine factories. Stating that lettuce and spinach can produce vaccines, grown in backyards and entire fields. Where mRNA technology can currently be used to produce COVID19 vaccines in plants. The objective being the DNA containing the mRNA vaccines can be delivered into part of the plant cells where they can replicate. Thus demonstrating the plant ability to produce enough mRNA to compete with traditional  vax shots.

Science Daily reported 7^th January 2014 University of Washington published an article which referenced a new type of vaccines. One that would be easier to manufacture and much cheaper. A vaccine that could be manufactured on demand for human immunizations and administered within minutes after a disease broke out. Mass jabs for an entire population, for everyone immediately as soon as an epidemic starts. Blanket vaxing the entire population as published by Francious Banys, professor of chemical engineering and lead author of the ‘Journal of Nano-Medicine’. The research was funded by a grant from the ‘Grand Challenges Explorations’ which is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnering the National Institute of Health.

December 18^th 2019 the Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT News article entitled ‘Storing Medical Information below the Skins Surface’, where a specialized invisible dye is delivered along with a vaccine, that enables the patients  personal ID and vaccination history to be stored nakedly under the skin. The invisible quantum of dye is delivered by a micro needle patch.  The quantum invisible dye consists of nano-crystals, can remain for at least 5 years under the skin where it emits infrared light that can be detected by a specifically equipped smart phone. These applications mean that populations can be traced, tracked through this invisible quantum dot.

30^th April 2022-Gates Foundation website ‘Gates Notes’ published an article ‘Everyone, everywhere- vaccinate the world in 6 months’ to prevent pandemics. He stated that the COVID19 jabs are safe and effective, however there are serious problems  he said that we need to solve before the next pandemic comes along and that is “those who have not been jabbed. The world needs to produce enough vaccines for everyone on the planet within 6 months of discovering a new pathogen. 8 Billion doses for a single dose vaccine, 16 billion for a 2 dose vaccine version. Steps need to be taken to accelerate the invention of new vaccines, there will be a process of a lot of trial and error. Connecting diagnostic tests to the human trial system we can automatically suggest to doctors that their patients should join a trial. mRNA vaccines could help speed up manufacturing doing away with conventional ways which are quite complex. Transferring the technology know how from one company to another. Just swap the old mRNA for a new one, its easier to transfer between companies. He added “with these advances it will be possible to achieve something amazing beyond preventing pandemics, eradicating entire families of pathogens” A world that could rid itself of all coronaviruses, even the influenza virus. NOTE The common cold is a coronavirus. No-one has ever magically got rid of the common cold. “A future without pandemics and without the flu, Gates said “now that’s worth investing in”

Gates referred to new modular technologies in the pipeline, that are easier, cheaper to build, factories that can be adapted to make different vaccines and tackle vaccine hesitancy. He made a You Tube Video on ‘how to deal with rumours, myths in India. (You Tube Video ‘Dispelling Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural India). Gates has published many articles ‘The future our grandchildren disserve’. Bill Gate’s ‘The Year Ahead 2023 CNBC published report 23^rd January 2019 refers to Bill Gates and DAVOS (World Economic Forum). Where Bill Gates made some key points about his best investments where he turned $10 billion into $200 billion  by investing in global health organizations aimed at increasing access to vaccines that created a 20 to 1 return.

Gates Foundation established GAVI in 1999 pledging $750 to set GAVI up. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged US $750 million to set up  GAVI is a key partner in shaping the global vaccine market. Gates biggest investment, money maker. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation play a technical and financial role in the Global Vaccine Alliance to shape global markets, gathering data, decision making, providing financial support for market investments. Gates foundation also make substantial funding available to the World Health Org., (UN), therefore he does have influential global privileges. The foundations invests in activities ranging from vaccine discovery- development-delivery financially supporting  new entrants into the market.

A the author, researcher of this article, I am personally highly suspicious of the COVID Pandemic through research finding that the World Health Org., Immunization Agenda 2030 Report which is a Global Strategy to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The decade of action- 2020- 2030. The World Health Assembly with the support of UN Nation State Government and partners endorsed a global vision and strategy titled ‘Agenda 2030 -IA 2030 that envisions a world where everyone, everywhere at every age fully benefits from vaccines. It aims to maintain ‘hard won’ gains in immunization, recovering from the disruptions caused by COVID19, to achieve even more by leaving no-one behind-in any situation at any stage of life. It aims to maintain hard-won gains in immunization, recover from the disruptions caused by COVID-19, and achieve even more – by leaving no one behind, in any situation or at any stage of life.  A co-creation process with close engagement of countries to ensure that the vision, strategies, priorities and goals are aligned with each country’s needs. IA 2030 framework is designed to be tailored by countries to their local context, to be revised throughout the decade as new needs, challenges emerge. This also includes a framework of tailored indicators that enable use of data action to increase immunization programs at all levels. To monitor progress across all countries at country, regional, global levels. IA 2030 goals are designed to inspire action for implementation for health security, universal health coverage. Countries could set their own specific targets and milestones for the decade of action 2020-2030. This includes regional vaccination action plans. For partner organization, this could mean aligning organizational strategies and indicators to accelerate the attainment of IA 2030 goals. Putting people in the centre, led by governments and implemented through broad partnerships and driven by data. IA 2030 with strategic priorities referring to UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, Targets for the entire world. Extremely ambitious commitments to gain population vaccination over the 2020-2030 decade. A Decade of Action- as described by the UN WHO.

WHO published “Immunization is playing a critical role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Immunization to reach more people than any other health and social service, a key driver to universal health coverage. Immunization is critical to SDG3, promotes wellbeing for all ages. IA 2030 contributes either directly or indirectly to thirteen of the other SDGs of UN Agenda 2030 (Published by the WHO (UN) 1/4/2020). UN Agenda 2030 was introduced in October 2015 after the failing of UN Agenda 2021. UN Agenda 2030 is non-binding, however Jacinda Ardern was a guest speaker at a gathering hosted by Bill and Melinda Gates for WEF Global Shapers Community. Ardern boasted to the audience at the gathering that she had introduced UN Agenda 2030 into NZs domestic policies, making her the first in the world to lead the way, encouraging other countries to do the same. Once introduced into Domestic policy UN Agenda 2030 became binding and legal. GAVI Alliance created by Gates Foundation published an article on their website referring to ‘vaccine collaboration’. Titled ‘ Decade of Vaccine Collaboration’. A ten year vision of immunization for all people regardless of where they live, that was in 2010. Stating that in the next 10 years the global health community vision of a world in which all individuals and communities can be free of vaccine preventable diseases’. The Decade of Vaccines Collaboration- brought together diverse stakeholders to develop the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), GAVI (Bill Gates serves on the leadership council of the global vaccination collaboration steering committee. The Global Vaccine Action Plan IA2030. The Global Vaccine Plan (GVAP) has been endorsed by 194 UN Member State Governments at the World Health Assembly in 2012 where a framework was presented to achieve the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ vision for peoples in ALL communities worldwide. To reach vaccination targets in every region, country, community, to meet global and regional elimination targets and to develop, introduce new vaccines and technologies. Coincidental I don’t think so, the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy was launched in 2005. It was Bill Gates that provided the leadership of the Global Vaccine Plan for 194 UN Member State Govts, for every region, every community globally. Supported by their WHO (UN0 and UNICEF (UN) and the World Bank, including of course the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In 2005 the International Health Regulations were created at the World Health Assembly which are binding for 194 UN Member State Governments, which include 196 countries. Helen Clark is the co chair of a gathering working on a plan to add more resolutions to IHR 2005, also a plan for an International Pandemic Treaty. The results of this planning to be reported to a gathering at the UN Assembly in January, last month. The World Health Assembly have set a deadline of May 2024 for putting together a draft pandemic treay and proposed amendments to IHR 2005. (IHR Binding on 194 UN Nation States). Negotiations are under way in Geneva to amend the IHR 2005 regulations, to create a new WHO convention on pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery this is referred to as the International Pandemic Treaty. A rules based international order. This would go beyond legal restrictions it would be global compliancy, demands, international global cooperation.  Under Art 19 and 21 of the Constitution of the World Health Org.,, the World Health Assembly may adopt legally binding conventions and regulations.

The World Health Assembly therefore is composed of representatives of UN Member States, often ministers of health who meet once a year to vote on resolutions and decisions. So the final decision on what is adopted rests with Member States themselves. (Helen Clark is co chair of the latest proposed amendments to IHR 2005 and the International Pandemic Treaty). Article 60 of the WHO Constitution states that different voting quota’s apply to the adoption of regulations approved by the World Health Assembly. This requires 2/3rds majority of the Member UN States present and voting in the Assembly.  Under Art 60 regulations can be adopted by a simple majority unless the representatives classify them as ‘important issues’ on an ad-hoc basis, then this required 2/3^rd majority. However, despite the differences in the provisions requiring the necessary majorities and procedures for entry into force, agreements and regulations are in practice, generally decided upon by consensus in the plenary sessions  of the World Health Assembly. Agreements can be adopted on any matter according to Art 19 of the WHO Convention. Art 2 WHO enumerates 22 functions of the organization, first is to act as the ‘governing and coordinating body of International Health’. WHO deals with the regimes of  International Law for example ‘access to medicines’ due to intellectual property rights and environmental health (A One Health Approach- for everyone, everywhere at every age). Agreements become binding once they have undergone the entire ratification process.  Under Art 21 of the WHO Constitution, the World Health Assembly can adopt legally binding regulations on States unless they expressly reject them (opt out), however once the period specified in the regulations for rejecting or formulating reservations has elapsed, the rules in question are binding all UN Member States that have not expressed any objections. In January 2022 the US Government submitted a proposal to amend 13 provisions of IHR 2005. Also an initiative where WHO (UN) could declare a public health emergency of international concern without first consulting the affected UN Member States, the creation of a new mid level emergency declaration

NOTE: The One Health Approach of the WHO (UN) Convention. The World Health Assembly includes environmental, food and animal health to be included. (Food, animals-wild, domestic- soil, plants, air etc., every living organism. If these new amendments are adopted, if an International Pandemic Treaty is established all UN Member State governments must increase their funding towards this, this will be considerably much higher than contributions to WHO by UN Nations States now, hence more money from tac payers pockets and massive control over our health, a One World Health Governance for ALL. Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.  Helen Clark Twitter “GAVI are making vaccine available to ALL, so that no-one gets left behind”

8^th March 2021 NZ Herald published an article – vaccines are expected to arrive in New Zealand during the second half of the year,” Jacinda Ardern said. “This brings our total Pfizer order to 10 million doses or enough for 5 million people to get the two shots needed to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.. “.8^th March 2021 Stuff NZ reported “The government’s new order brings New Zealand’s total for the Pfizer vaccine to 10m doses. Because the vaccine requires 2 shots to be effective. On the 10^th March 2021 The Beehive reported  “New agreements secure access to 7.6 million doses from AstraZeneca – enough for 3.8 million people, and 10.72 million doses. We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need”

NOTE: A Texas Court has ordered FDA to shares thousands of Pfizer documents that were received by FDA prior to the authorization of the Pfizer jab on the open market. Pfizer had refused the request stating no-one would view this information. However the thousands of pages of Pfizer info will not be available to the public or anyone else for at least another 2-3 years. Pfizer admitted in the European Parliamentary Court they did not test the Pfizer jab to see if it stopped transmission of the virus. Early 2022 the WHO (UN) requested that all UN Nation Governments align the way they reported COV ID deaths with the way WHO does. If a person has a COVID19 Positive Test and dies within 28 days of that test this is counted as a COVID19 Death, that window on 28 days can be extended. In UK it has been known at times to be extended to 60 days.  Therefore the man that got shot by police in Auckland where the mainstream news-media called this a COVID death this is the reason why. Therefore suicide number, post jab deaths etc., etc., can magically disappear within the data.

The intentional deliberate plundering of NZ through UN Immunization Alliance 2030 Collaboration The World Bank, UNICEF and WHO (UN) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  Reference to speech in the House “We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need “ Two new vaccines secured, enough for every New Zealander .

https://scitechdaily.com/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines-using-plants-as-mrna-factories/        https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2023C04/  
Covid-19: Pfizer vaccine purchase order made for 8.5 million …https://www.stuff.co.nz › .8^th March 2021
COVID-19 vaccine roll-out plan | Beehive.govt.nz https://www.beehive.govt.nz › … 10 March

We are setting out the plan today after securing enough Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for everyone in New Zealand to get the two doses they need …
Two new vaccines secured, enough for every New Zealander https://www.beehive.govt.nz ›

Twitter  https://twitter.com/HelenClarkNZ/status/1265449131364937728

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-coronavirus-37m-for-vaccine-research-and-to-join-global-development/YOEEFRONOYHNFOU43NT4AJMUHA/?c_id=1&objectid=12334887

Decade of Vaccines (DoV) Collaboration

Global Vaccine Action Plan (

https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/global-health-development/decade-vaccine-collaboration

https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030

Gates ‘Dispelling Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural India is on You Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y1jG2bVUVM

https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Vaccinate-the-world-in-six-months 30th April 2022        https://scitechdaily.com/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines-using-plants-as-mrna-factories/

https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218      https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Vaccinate-the-world-in-six-months 30th April 2022

https://www.gavi.org/operating-model/gavis-partnership-model/bill-melinda-gates-foundation

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html     https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=19023

...

The World Health Assembly (UN) Review Committee on the International Health Regulations 2005 have  been busy putting together proposals for an International  Pandemic Treaty. Helen Clark is a co chair of the Review Committee.  The WHO (UN) International Health Regulations 2005 are binding and lawful in 196 countries includes 194 UN Nation States.  If the proposals as to amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations are introduced they will come into effect immediately and be lawfully binding.  Such provisions shall become effective from the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General of the United Nations.

The WHO International Pandemic Treaty  violates the normal process for ratifications of Treaties under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Please click on the link within the above image which will take you to my rumble video on this huge concern which will effect all of us.

...