CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

HEALTH SAFETY: WOMENS SANITARY PRODUCTS AND MENS GROOMING PRODUCTS

In 2020 the ‘Toxic Free Report’ revealed the true ingredients of a big brand non organic tampons and sanitary pads. It was found that many of these products contain pesticide and plasticizers.

Do women even question what ingredients are in menstrual products, what chemicals they may contain.  Independent research has detected the presence of toxic chemicals that can mimic hormones.

Disruptive chemicals (EDCs) that are linked to cancer or reproductive disorders.

January 28th 2019  a report included ‘how diapers and menstrual pads are exposing babies and women to hormone disrupting toxic chemicals. Health advocates say the report is the latest example of products falling through a regulation process.

The report stated that most diapers and sanitary pads contain volatile organic compounds, that long exposure of these significant chemicals could be absorbed via the genitals.

More than 1500 women complained and signed a class action lawsuit claiming harm from menstrual pads made by the company Lillian.

The pads were removed from the market. Women suffered rashes, infections, irregular periods and bad cramping. Overseas  Children’s Health Advocates have for years asked for stricter regulations on babies diapers

FDA do not consider these as medical devices therefore they are not required to go through medical testing to prove safety. Children health advocates have for years asked for stricter regulation of baby diapers,

Science Direct  reported in 2020 that ‘Violatile organic compounds in feminine hygiene products sold on the US market, in a survey of products and health risks.

These products are used widely across the world, US sales of these products amount to $3 billion annually.

These included tampons, menstrual pads, sanitary pads and liners, washes sprays and wipes. Stats.com 2020 reported that a woman may use more than 10,000 pads or tampons across her menstrual lifecycle

In 2020, New York State will require disclosure of FHP ingredients, the first such requirement of its kind in the US (AP News, 2019).

Health reports state that arteries, blood vessels and lymphatic vessels are abundant in the vaginal wall, this allows for direct transfer of chemicals to the blood through the peripheral circulation

May 19th 2021 Stuff NZ reported “Most women are unaware period products sold in New Zealand  contain plastic”. But there are lax labelling standards, most women are unaware they could be introducing potentially harmful products into their bodies.

A survey revealed that 61% of respondents were unaware that most tampons contain plastics.

The majority of period products sold in New Zealand contain plastics, but due to lax labelling standards, most women are unaware they could be introducing potentially harmful products into their bodies each month.

A recent survey found 61 per cent of respondents were unaware most tampons contain plastics. Products are exempt from mandatory labelling requirements.  This means the manufacturers are under no obligation to list all or any of the elements used to create a sanitary pad, tampon, liner  Most tampons on sale in NZ use polypropylene, polyester and or polyethylene to give tampons a smooth exterior coating.

Most tampons on sale in New Zealand use polypropylene, polyester and/or polyethylene to give tampons their smooth exterior coating That part makes direct contact with a woman’s vaginal passage. University of Canterbury an environmental chemist researches human exposure to contaminates said that those products are plastics and could release plastic fragments. She said the health effects of plastics in humans from ingestion is unknown, but small fragments of plastics can move around. Gaw added “That a lot of this we don’t knowof the potential dangers”

Polyester fabric, for example, often contained antimony, which has been identified as a possible carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

“That we need to think about those products because they are used in a potential exposure pathway into the body with proximity to reproductive organs.  Without mandatory labelling, said Gaw, it was difficult to fully investigate the safety of products on the market. Sani women have the right to be fully informed before making that choice.

This should be the same for any products ingested, injected into our bodies, we all have the right to know the full ingredients contained in the products and the risks, adverse effects that may occur.

What about Mens Products, such as deodrants, aftershave, shaving cream that contain toxic chemicals that link to cancer, sperm damage and other health problems says a report by Environmental Defence.  The Non Profit charity released ‘The Manscape: The Dirt on Toxic Ingredients in Mens Body Care Products to raise awareness of toxins in grooming products.  They said “People think of this as a women’s products issue. This came about as mens health issues were on the agenda thanks to Movember, a month long campaign which sees men grow facial hair to raise awareness about prostrate cancer.

Environmental Defence as previously investigated women’s products but this was the first time they peered inside men’s shaving kits. Time to push NZ Politicians to publish ingredients in their entirety that enter our bodies

...

2018 ARDERN STILL BOASTS THAT SHE WAS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNION OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST YOUTH

Obviously once a socialist always a socialist. Arderns documents that she gained many insights in her International socialist leadership role, that she appreciated the think tanks  of Europe.

In correspondence to the Friedrich Ebert Foundation Ardern corresponded to them on NZ Government letterhead as she discloses how NZ citizens would suffer almost 50% unemployment within 10-20 years in 2018.

That change economically, politically, societally was not just about to happen it was happening now (2018)

PLEASE GO TO THE LINK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU DIRECTLY TO THE VIDEO I HAVE PRODUCED ON THIS CORRESPONDENCE AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION I HAVE SHARED.

NOTE: If you have not subscribed to my website as yet please do so now and feel free to share.  Carol Sakey

...

NZ GOVERNMENT GIVES ECO MAFIA (OIO) CONSENT TO BUY UP SENSITIVE LAND IN NEW ZEALAND

FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IN NEW ZEALAND FARMLAND (CORRUPT & CRIMINAL INVESTORS)

Foreign Investment in New Zealand farmland has become much easier when it comes to forestry investment.  Farming groups fear too much productive farming land is being lost. That large scale forestry conversions puts rural life at risk. Farming groups requested the government to urgently review ‘forestry investment’ in New Zealand ( Souce-RNZ 24/2/2022-Nov 2019).

RNZ reported 17th October 2019 -The NZ Govt deliberately encourages foreign investors to purchase farmland in NZ  A ‘Green Rich List’ was published of NZ’s largest private land owners, the largest being foreign owned forestry companies (Land Information Data). There is a network nationwide. Some members of the NZ public were astounded when mainstream media revealed the Chinese/Malaysia  ‘Tiong Family Group, emerged as the 2nd largest foreign investor in NZ land. ( 19/10/2019). They are owners of Forestry, Media, Property Assets worldwide.

Investments owned by the ‘Tiong Family Group have emerged in NZ include  ‘Ernslaw One Forests, NZ King Salmon, ‘Rimbunan-Hijau’,Oregan Group (subsidiary of Ernslaw ) and the ‘Neil Group’ a land development company in NZ and Winstone Pulp. (NZ Stuff News Media). NZ King Salmon & the Neil Group are intertwined family enterprise activities, connected to ‘Sarawak Forestry Corporation’  Sarawak Forestry Corporation is a statutory body of the Sarawak Govt formed in 1995.  ( Commercial forestry) A report dated 16th June 2019 questioned ‘’Why Shell should think twice about before engaging with the timber crooks”

Hikurangi Forest Products is the largest overseas investor in NZ land who was scrutinised for causing serious environmental damage in Tolaga Bay. Hikurangi Forest Products was owned by Samling’s Global Group however it was sold to ‘New Forest’ in 2019 a Sydney based company. ‘New Forests’ is a global forestry investment manager that offers high impact strategies in ‘Sustainable Forestry’

Rimunan Hijau Group owned by the Tiong Family Group have been published many times as having a bad reputation of environmental destruction in Malaysia and Papua New Guinea.  There have been references made to ‘timber barons attempting to enter the tree planning bandwagon. The publishing of false information that 63% of state remained forests remain, however they have been scrubbed by the notorious state corrupted government program in Sarawak. (North West Borneo)

The propaganda machine wrongly promote this as ‘Forest Landscape Restoration’ These are the worst eco-crooks on the planet, however mainstream media persistently blame the deforestation  (destruction of forests) on man made global warming when it really is  an eco-corrupt mafia machine.

Corrupt eco media machines cosy up to corrupt governmental regimes. The Tiong Family group’ who have heavily invested in NZ farmland as forestry investment (owners of Rimbunan Hijau) have key political positions in the ‘Chinese-Malaysia Sarawak United Peoples Party’ and have the lions share of forestry plantation concessions. The Sarawak United Peoples Party is a left wing movement established in 1959 by leftists many are members of the underground communist movement in Sarawak. They have a damming reputation of seriously violating workers.

The ‘Tiong Group’ control the largest Chinese Newspaper conglomerate ‘Media Chinese International Ltd’  The Tiong Group also own oil and gas and numerous other businesses. They also have their roots in ‘Sibu Timber’  ‘Sibu Timber’ logging companies have been reported as having developed activities of stripping out billions of dollars of timber from Sarawak Natural Heritage for decades.

Tiong Family Group ( Rimbunan-Hijau’ were caught illegally destroying remaining forests in the South Pacific (Reported 20th January 2020) ‘Predator logging company thrown out of the Solomon 2. Islands. Two of the sons of the Tiong Family Group were among the shareholders of the company booted out of the Solomon Islands.

Tiong Group’s investment was in a company named ‘Gallego Resources’, which has destroyed swathes of land on the Solomon Islands (Exposed by National Geographic). The Solomon Islands are the second largest suppliers of tropical logs to China (National Geographic). They are also a subsidiary of Sarawak Timber companies this includes the link to  Rimbunan-Hijau that belongs to Sibu based Tiong Family Group.  Rimbunan-Hijau has a record in the Solomon Islands which has mirrored patterns of what has happened in the rainforests of Borneo by the same few Sarawak businessmen. Always follow the money.

Gallego Resources is linked to  Rimbunan-Hijau’s company which is named the ‘Mafrica Corporation whose headquarters are in Sibu, Sarawak and parts of Africa.   Mafrica Corporation has made itself at home in New Guinea, Indonesia, Solomon Islands, Central Africa, Republic of Congo and New Zealand. Further information documented with the Solomon Business Registry in 2019 revealed sixteen further companies predominantly forestry owned run by Tiong brothers

Corruption and bribery are rife in the Solomon Islands references have been made to ‘One Pacific Co Ltd.,’. This was set up by Gallego Resources director Wong Hook Ping in 2014.. Shares were hand to the Tiong Group in 2017. It has been reported “Corruption and bribery are rife within the logging industry in the Solomons, a select few benefit at the expense of the many”.  Politicians, public officials and landowners have benefited from royalties, profits, bribes, inducements, tax avoidance practices. MP’s being shareholders of ‘Tiong Family Group’ companies overseas. Timber corruption in the South Pacific has been described as common-place.

Greenpeace have published reports that ‘Tiong Group’ owned Rimbunan Hijau activities have included a total disregard for the law, illegalities in many aspects of their operations. References are made to the Greenpeace report 2004 which includes:-Environmental damages, Human Rights Abuses, Social Conflict, Political Corruption, Treating workers like slaves, Racial and Sexual Abuse and Labour exploitation. That workers are receiving 15cents per hour and have had no wage increases for 10 years..

Dept of Labour- New Guinea have documented ‘safety practices are appalling so bad they cannot be measured, their behaviour unacceptable, that workers spend their time trapped in unsanitary hazardous conditions in camps. They are beaten up by the local police squad who enforce ‘Tiong Groups’ owned Rimbunan Hijau company laws if workers try to open trade facilities.  Rimbunan works outside the law and communities find themselves powerless to act against the powerful Rimbunan-Hijau.                                                                                                                                                    Women in New Guinea are forced to have sex with the company’s bosses and overseas workers.

Note: Rimbunan Hijau is owned by Tiong Family Group that has large investments in farmland in New Zealand. The Overseas Investment Office New Zealand approved of their large investment in NZ Farm land.  Masalia News articles have featured the companies appalling record on human rights & serious environmental issues ‘The Malaysian Multinational that destroys lives, rapes the country, destroys natural resources for self rewards, assisted by corrupt politicians and public servants, protected by its own newspaper.

RNZ Report 20th September 2018. ‘Malaysian billionaire, the owner of another Tolago Bay forestry company was granted 24 consents to purchase sensitive land between 2005-2017 even though its company faces accusations of Environmental.  Corrupt, criminal foreign investors in NZ land have been given the ‘NZ Governments Good Character Test’ Land Information, NZ Overseas Investment office-manager ‘Vanessa Horne’ said when referring to these companies “After considering various matter, including limitation issues, ages of fines- it’s too long ago to act on the information alone” when it comes to Overseas Investment Consent.

The Council Of Trade Unions reported ‘The OIO Good Character Test only applies to individuals not the company itself, therefore companies with poor records of environmental practices therefore no action can be taken by the current law against these companies, therefore bad practices will continue. NZ Overseas Investment Office (OIO) have said “to take enforcement action it would need to be proved that the person is not fit to hold an asset”. (Note: Even though  corrupt, criminal evidence is well documented of environmental and human rights abused).

The Tiong Family Group have been investing in New Zealand for over 20years, and have been granted more than 90 approved consents to companies controlled by the Tiong Family Group.  Note:- Ardern’s recent trip to Japan ‘A Live Tour of Finding the Rainforest’. A haven for all as NZ and Japan agree to enhance their partnership to protect the pacific (April 22nd 2022)

Note:- NZ Govt Overseas Investment Office website document ‘The role of nz Govt OIO is to help realise the benefits of overseas investments while protecting NZs sensitive land and asset’. Greenpeace and National Geographic report environmental, racial and human rights abuses and political corruption overseas by companies owned and linked to the ‘Tiong Family Group’. Reports of racial, sexual abuse, exploitations have been made by RNZ, Civil Rights Groups, Greenpeace and National Geographic

Reports include ‘Papua New Guinea rain forests are being destroyed at an alarming rate by Rimbunan -Hijau and the supporting government. That people is communities are being abused. (Rimbunan Hijau owned by Tiong Family Group)

Yet New Zealand Government Department ‘Overseas Investment Office (OIO) give Tiong Group companies a ‘Squeaky Clean Character Test’- A consent to own the 2nd largest farmland assets in New Zealand.

NOTE:  Must add this – Prince Charlie was not happy when mummy ‘Queen Elizabeth’ knighted Tiong Hiew King, the founder, chairman of the Rimbunana Hijau Group in 2019. What a smack in the face for Charlie boy after all he established the ‘ 2007 Princes Rainforests Project’ .

The Rainforests are being destroyed by greedy wealthy conglomarates not man-made climate change Ardern and her political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington promote and publicise.

Ardern and her political cronies should stop throwing farmers under the tractor and using them as their whipping boy, time to expose the government own links to corrupt criminal Eco Mafia’s.

 

NOTE: IF YOU HAVE NOT SUSCRIBED TO:    httsp://wakeupnz.org   PLEASE DO SO  NOW. Thank You – Carol Sakey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...

FORGET OVER-POPULATION OF THE WORLD HOWEVER NEW ZEALAND POPULATION WILL INCREASE!

Populations are declining. Population decline can be caused by one or a combination of many possible trends. Aging, birth-rates, emigration, fertility rates and high mortality rate, wars and violence also disease and catastrophes. Lets add corrupt criminal governments, global elitist regimes to this too.   A shrinking population means wealth can increase and top that off with a shrinking workforce which is being rapidly imposed on civilians worldwide today by the introduction of advanced AI technology

In 2018 Ardern gave a speech in Belgium where she publicly informed her audience that New Zealand’s workforce risks declining by 48% or more within 20 years. Also in her speech she boasted several times that she was the leader of the Youth International Socialist’s several years back. That also that its important to stay true to open borders.

Ardern agreement with World Economic Forum that New Zealand is to become the guineapig state for AI Reimagining Regulations’ Where Agritech would be widely promoted, replacing traditional farming.This being seeds, crops having sensors controlled by a group of drones, using AI Data, self driving machinery. Several Agri-businesses (farms) could be operated by one person in a room. This means the severe cutting back of livestock.  Farmers have done their utmost to appease Ardern’s socialist/Marxist demands, regulations (commands by comrade Ardern). Even though NZ Farmers have fenced off 98% or more of their farmland from waterways still the government demands more. (Eco-Fascism).  You only have to join the dots and seriously look at what the NZ Government has determined for the future of NZ. It’s not a pretty sight, and its far from being kind. It’s cruel and it’s nasty

As for population control, we as New Zealanders are living under a COVID veiled death cult. Increased suicide, assisted suicide, increased abortions – Arderns introduced one of the worst abortions Acts in the world.  How many people have not visited doctors, hospitals to be checked out, scanned for possible cancer. What about the zoomed, telephone doctor-patient meetings to determine whether a person is sick or not?  As our govt promote tele-health and tele-medicine.  Lets not forget the cherry picking of what the govt relays to the public of NZ, note Ardern and her political cronies never publicize the deaths and serious harm done to New Zealand citizens post the COVID19 Jabs.

Free speech is severely and seriously targeted. Political policing targeting those that speak up about any of the Acts  the govt has imposed on NZrs. Including that of Climate Alarmism. And the dumbing down of education, the politicking of school children.  The teaching of Critical Race theory where children are made to feel guilty because of the colour of their skin. Mental Health Authorities in the UK have documented they are alarmed at the anxiety that children are suffering in UK Schools around being taught climate alarmism hence introducing a new mental disorder namely ‘Eco-Anxiety’

NOTE:- Many countries are facing demographic changes, shrinking populations. It has been projected by analysists at ‘Business Insider’ and other outlets twenty countries that have the greatest decline over the next three decades (2020-2050)

Bulgaria, Romania, Lithuania, Greece, Latvia, Ukraine, Serbia, Bosnia, Estonia, Hungry, Poland, Georgia, Croatia, Portugal, Moldova, North Macedonia, Japan, Cuba, Albania and Italy                  Bulgaria’s population is expected to decline by 22.5% from 6.9 million in 2020 to 5.4 million in 2050. Mass outbound migration is the largest contributor towards Bulgaria’s population decline.   Lithuanian population is projected to shrink by 22.1% over the next three decades. The population is expected to shrink from 2.7 million to 2.1 million people. Like Bulgaria, Lithuania’s largest population loss is due to mass migration. Latvia is expecting a 21.6% population loss between 2020 and 2050. Latvia has lost about one-fifth of its population since joining the European Union in May 2004. Latvia’s population loss is caused by economic migration and low birth rates.

Ukraine’s population is projected to drop from 43.7 million in 2020 to 35.2 million in 2050, a 19.5% loss. High emigration rates coupled with high death rates and low birth rates are to blame for Ukraine’s population loss. The country’s birth rate is 9.2 births per 1,000 people and its death rate is 15.2 deaths per 1,000 people. The Serbian population is expected to decline from 8.7 million to 7.1 million over the next 30 years. This is a decline of about 18.9%. Many of Serbia’s highly educated and skilled workers have left the country to find better job opportunities since there are very few in Serbia. The high migration rates are coupled with low fertility rates.  The population is projected to decline by 18.2%, shrinking from 3.3 million in 2020 to 2.7 million in 2050.

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s fertility rate is well below the population replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman at 1.26 births per woman. Croatia’s population is expected to shrink by 18.0%. The population is projected to drop from 4.1 million to 3.4 million over the next 30 years. The population reached its peak in 1991 at 4.78 million but has been declining since because of low birth rates and an aging population.

Moldova’s population will decline by 16.7% from 2020 to 2050. The population is expected to fall by 600,000 from 4 million to 3.4 million. Poverty and corruption in Moldova have pushed the highly-skilled, young workers away from the country and the aging population has been plagued by poor living standards and high mortality rate. Japan’s population is projected to lose 20.7 million people between 2020 and 2050. The population is expected to shrink from 126.5 million to 105.8 million, a 16.3% decline. Japan’s population has been falling since 2011 due to very low fertility rates (1.42 births per woman) and an aging population.

The Albanian population is expected to decrease by 15.8% over the next 30 years, falling from 2.9 million people to 2.4 million people. It is estimated that over 38% of the Albanian population lives abroad. Romania’s population is projected to decline by 15.5% from 2020 to 2050. The population will reduce from 19.2 million to 16.3 million over the next three decades. Between 2007 and 2015, about 3.5 million Romanians have gone abroad to escape poverty and widespread corruption.  The population of Greece is expected to shrink from 10.4 million to 9.0 million, 1 13.4% over the next 30 years.

Greece’s population began declining in 2011 when the first negative birth rate was recorded. Greece’s population could decline up to 50% over the next 50 years if nothing is done to combat it.  Estonia’s population of 1.3 million is projected to decline by 12.7% to 1.2 million by 2050. Compared to other Baltic states, Estonia’s population decline has been relatively slow and stable. Immigration has delayed a quicker population decline in recent year.

Hungary’s population is projected to drop from 9.7 million in 2020 to 8.5 million in 2050. This is a population decline of about 12.3%. Hungary’s population has fallen by about over 40,000 per year and shows no signs of slowing down. Policies Hungary to help slow the population decline are focused on boosting birthrates. Poland’s population is predicted to drop by 12.0%. Over the next 30 years, the population will drop from 37.8 million to 33.3 million people. Low birth rates and continued emigration are the two main reasons for Poland’s population decline. The population is expected to decline by 11.8%, shrinking from 4.0 million to 3.5 million from 2020 to 2050.

The decline in Georgia’s population is caused by the emigration in search of better jobs in other countries.  The Portuguese population is projected to decline from 10.2 million to 9.1 million over the next three decades, a 10.9% decline. Portugal has made attempts to lure back those who emigrated, whether or not they are highly paid or highly skilled and North Macedonia’s population is expected to drop by 10.9%, shrinking from 2.1 million to 1.9  million from 2020 to 2050.

Cuba’s population of 11.3 million is expected to shrink to 10.2 million by 2050, a 10.3% decline. The young people leaving the country and low birth rates are resulting in an increasingly aging population. Cuba’s population is expected to be the ninth-oldest in the world by 2050. Italy’s population is projected to shrinking by 10.1% from 2020 to 2050. The current population of 60.5 million people will reduce to 54.4 million over the next 30 years. Births are at an all-time low since the unification of Italy and young people are leaving Italy to other European countries for job opportunities. Population has fallen by 24.6% since its independence in 1991

‘INFORMATION FROM STATS NZ (GOVT) WEBSITE: These are just a few of the calculations by population studies. Stats NZ(Govt)  National Population projection: 2020 – 2073. Indicates the future population of New Zealand, probable outcomes based on different fertility, mortality and migration assumptions.

Please Note: NZ Government are using predictions, probabilities and assumptions, all devoid of facts, this is nothing new however these predictive assumptions and probabilities determine government Bills, Acts, Orders and Policies that control New Zealanders lives. ( Noted by Carol Sakey).  However the governments information website heads the following as Key Facts:-  (NOTE:  Carol Sakey calls these namely ‘Legal Fictions’)

NZ Governments -Short Term projections are as follows:- Annual population growth has a 50 percent probability of being between 0.5 and 0.9 percent in 2021 and between 0.5 and 1.2 percent in 2022. New Zealand’s population (5.09 million in 2020) has a 90 percent probability of increasing to 5.13–5.51 million in 2025 and to 5.19–5.94 million in 2030.

NZ Governments – Long Term Projections:- New Zealand’s population (5.09 million in 2020) has a 90 percent probability of being between 5.34–7.13 million in 2048 and 5.27–8.48 million in 2073.

THE WRITER CAROL SAKEY NOTES:-  MAIN CITIES OF NEW ZEALAND ARE TO BE FUTURISTIC CITIES WITH HUGE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS.  NZ GOVERNMENT DETERMINING RURAL MIGRATION TO EXTREMELY CONDENSED  HIGHLY POPULATED URBAN/ CITY AREA’S (UN HUMAN HABITAT 3)

 

New Zealand STNZ: Projection- Populations- Very High Migration. (2020-2073) Stats NZ -Govt.   : Projection: Population: Very High Migration data was reported at 8,554,000.000 Person in 2073. This records an increase from the previous number of 8,495,700.000 Person for 2072. New Zealand STNZ: Projection: Population: Very High Migration data is updated yearly, averaging 6,950,100.000 Person from Jun 2020 to 2073, with 54 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8,554,000.000 Person in 2073 and a record low of 5,093,500.000 Person in 2020. New Zealand STNZ: Projection: Population: Very High Migration data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics New Zealand. The data is categorized under Global Database’s New Zealand

 

IF YOU HAVE NOT YET SUBSCRIBED TO MY WEBSITE PLEASE DO SO NOW. THANK YOU.  Carol Sakey

...