THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR TE PATI MAORI’S AGGRESSION

Since Anthropology emerged as a scientific discipline in the 19th Century the coined phrase Indigenous and Tribal Peoples have been a major focus. According to the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues there is reported to be 370 Million so called Indigenous people in 90 countries globally (Reported By the UN). Approx 70% live in Asia. There is reported to be 5,000 ethnic Cultures of Indigenous People

The Rights & Interests of so called Indigenous Peoples are recognized through various International Declarations Eg; 1989 Internation Labor Org., Convention (No 169) * 1992 UN Convention on Biological Diversity * 2007 UN Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) The UNDRIP covers Civil, * Political * Economic *Social * Cultural *Environmental Rights & Interests under International Law (Also Human Rights Laws)

The UNDRIP imposes Obligations , Commitments on UN Member States, Organizations & Inter-governmental bodies. Included is the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs http://www.iwgia.org/culture-and-identity/ identification-of-indigenous-people)  Also a growing body of Human Rights Entities

The Diversity of Indigenous peoples was adopted by the UN System, where a modern understanding of this was utilized worldwide. The modern understanding of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples met the following criteria by the UN as ‘Self-Identification ‘ *Historical continuity with Pre-colonial History and / or Pre-Settler Societies * Accepted by their Tribal Community  *Ancestral environment.  Indigenous Peoples were historically referred to as Tribal or Native Peoples

There is Official Universal definition of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples in International Law. (UN). Although various UN Agencies and International NGOs- Corporations etc., with self interests also Central/Local Govts of UN Nations States have utilized the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples as to Regulations- Policies- Political and Monetary self -interests.

In the 1970’s the coined phrase was used as a way of linking experiences, issues, struggles of groups- ( De-Colonization). The first meeting of the UN Working Group of Indigenous Populations (WGP) took place 9/8/1982. Is now celebrated as the International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People. Again – No definition of Indigenous People was adopted by the UN Agency. The Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous issues stated.

In the “concept of Indigenous Peoples the prevailing view today, is that there is No Formal Universal Definition on the term ‘Indigenous Peoples – given that a single definition will inevitably be with or with (over or under) inclusiveness- thus making sense in some societies but not in others”. However a number of UN Agencies have used the term Indigenous Peoples on Statements, coverages for certain International Agreements (But these are definitions used for particular reports)

Another example is that the Inter-American Commission On Human Rights doesn’t provide a definition of Indigenous Peoples, but have stated that ‘Self-identification’ as being a fundamental criteria’.  Manvir Singh an  Anthropologist states there’s a lack of coherence, inconsistencies  in which ethnic groups are called Indigenous or not. People argue the term. Have pressure put on them to self identify themselves as Indigenous People’. Thus erasing Identification. This varies from one country to another. Adding – There is no accepted Universal Definition of  the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples

The UN ILO International Labour Org., twice adopted definitions of Indigenous Peoples at their Conventions in 1957 & 1989. Only a few countries acknowledged it therefore could not be used in International Law. Only by the countries that adopted the definition. The World Bank  definition of Indigenous People is not Binding by International law as it is determined within Banks Operational Policies * Policy Guidelines. Documents and Agreements of ‘Good Faith’

UN Agenda 21 (1992) recognized the potential contribution in using the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples referring to Sustainable Development. The 2024 UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 16) UN Nation States agreed to a new permanent body for Indigenous Peoples. Which allows them to advise COP members on Biodiversity (An Indigenous worldview) on Sustainability.

From the UN 1993 World Conference on Human Rights- the  (UN Vienna Declaration ) was adopted- recognizing the culture of Indigenous Peoples. Described as a ‘Strong Commitment to – Economic *Social*Cultural Wellbeing. (The enjoyment of the Fruits of Sustainable Development)  9th August 1994 UN proclaimed as International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People (Their Rights & Interests) 1995 UN launched the Decade of the Worlds Indigenous Peoples. (UN Resolution 49/214) Furthering-Advancing the Global Agenda

The UN in 2021 referenced the UN Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples. To be documented into International laws Namely ‘Under the Umbrella of Social Justice. Dystopia ‘ Some Animals have more rights than others.

Te Pati Maori’s strong connection to the UNDRIP (Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indifenous Peoples). First adopted on  13th September 2007  at the New York UN Assembly. It had taken 20 + years to draft. There was much debate and discussion during this time on the UNDRIP by the working group at the UN

. Te Pati Maori actively engage in the Principles of the UNDRIP (Seld Governance). With Te Tiriti o Waitangi committed to the UNDRIP. Several Kerero Constitutional Conventions held at Auckland University. Preplanning the embedding of the UNDRIP into NZs Constitutional Arrangements. The UNDRIP being a crucial tool for Iwi/Maori Self-Governance

Although NZ Rejected the UNDRIP in 2007 – John Key and Pita Sharples Deputy leader of the Maori Party made a deal. Under a veil of secrecy Pita Sharples attended the UN and adopted the UNDRIP for NZ. When John Key was asked by the secrecy his response was “I did not want to spoil Pita Sharples Thunder’. New Zealand’s have no say when it comes to the State adopting International Laws. NZ is a party to some 1900 International Agreements.

Although the UNDRIP is Non-Binding there is also a commitment, obligation to pursue it, implement it. Its not legally Legislative. Sit outside Hard Law  as a Soft Law, can be used– called upon- referenced by the Judicial. Unless it is embedded in NZ Domestic Laws its Non Binding. (But there are  serious implications when it comes to implementing the UNDRIP in NZ.

It all lies in the 2007 UNDRIP adoption in the New York UN Assembly where Rosemary Banks Representative of NZ shared with the assembly why NZ would not adopt it. Its extremely important to know why because this is the real reason for the Hikoi. For David Seymour being attacked. Spoiling Te Pati Maori and their activist collaborators thunder for their self interested preplanning for their future self  interests. (The reasons for the insame aggressive behavior in Parliament)

Lets get to the root of the course.. Firstly the UNDRIP adoption into legislation is crucial for the Self Governance of Iwi/Maori. UNDRIP is a crucial tool- a weapon of aggression… NZ * US * Canada * Australia did not ratify the Declaration at this time…Rosemary Banks was NZs Representative at the UN New York Assembly at the time.

She explained to the gathering why NZ would not sign the UNDRIP. (1) It gives Indigenous Peoples Control- ownership of Entire Lands of NZ (2) Did not take into account that people already legally-lawfully owned land (Had Property Rights)  (3)Redress- Compensation for Entire Lands of NZ (Ownership- Control of All NZs Natural Resources (4) Veto Rights Over Legislation  (5) Two Classes of Citizenship).

Winston Peters states NZ First will dump the UNDRIP (That’s not happened yet). David Seymour is skirting around the edges not talking about the UNDRIP. But targeting how Farmers are having to seek Cultural Rights on their lands by  Iwi Tribal Groups. And that Council.

Such as Auckland Council has an Iwi Advisory Independent Group where people , businesses, farmers have to seek their advice on Resource Management Consents. (Co-Governance – Veto Rights are already (still) being implemented. ACT PARTY now have a Petition online to Dump Te Mana Te Wai it appears regulations, rules are being made by those whom have Iwi/Maori ancestry

Race Based Politics. Critical Race Theory is rife in New Zealand right throughout the system. Education.. Politics.. Society..Environment.. Health. This is not a Healthy situation for NZ. If we remain quiet  about this then we enable it. We must speak up. Ignore being character assassinated as Racist. Don’t self censor and don’t be censored. This is Separatism- not unity- this is Apartheid

WakeUpNZ

Researcher: Cassie

...

Other Blog Posts

WAKEY WAKEY NEW ZEALAND

For decades New Zealanders have listened to influential lawyers and political leaders talking about a “Treaty partnership” between Maori and the rest of society (or the “Crown”)

The Crown partnership with Maori was never entered onto the Treaty of Waitangi document that was signed on the 6th February 1840. This is a legal fiction that has been told and retold by those that reside in the cesspit of Wellington for several decades now.

Jacinda Ardern argued the toss saying that He Puapua is not a political document she lied. In her electioneering campaign of for the 2017 and 2020 elections not one part of her campaign mentioned He Puapua.

Geoffrey Palmers 1980’s idea that a Maori partnership with the Crown would be a good idea gained recognition by the Waitangi Tribunal. Hence in 1986  Hugh Kawharua presented a case to the court of appeal.  The presiding judge was Judge Robin Cooke.

Sir Hugh Kawharua was seen to have a conflict of interests, in his relationship to the courts, the Maori Council and the Waitangi Tribunal. Although their was no wording that stated that a Crown-Maori Partnership exists on the treaty the judicial allowed a legal fiction to be legally recognized.

Out of this legal fiction many regulations and legislations laws have taken shape which state Crown partnership with Maori  as per Treaty of Waitangi 1840.

The Treaty did not cede sovereignty to New Zealand there was no sovereignty at this time to cede.   The Treaty ceded the Chief’s individual territories to her majesty the Queen of England, for protection and the same rights as the people of England.  This was so Britain could form a legal Government in New Zealand.

On the 2nd October 1840 the London Gazette published that ‘New Zealand had become a Crown Colony’

25th November 1947 New Zealand adopted the Statute of Westminster that had been passed by the British Government in 1931. This granted New Zealand  Government complete autonomy in foreign and domestic affairs.  Therefore any injustices as to Maori claims before 1947 are the responsibility of the British Crown not that of the tax payers of New Zealand.

The Legal Fiction that a ‘Crown Partnership with Maori ‘ existed on the Treaty Of Waitangi of February 6th 1840 has given those that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington to run rough shot over the lives of New Zealanders, and the lies, corruption continues.

...

UNDER THE MULTILATERALISM

We are living in an era of globalization, which equates to profiteering by the unbridled pursuit of the filthy rich greedy elite of this world that will trample upon every aspect of a nationhood’s way of life. The UN has determined that this Nationalism threatens Multilateralism.

Nationalism is closely linked to Patriotism hence we have UN Nation Member States  persecuting, prosecuting and jailing patriot citizens in westernized nations worldwide.

According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognition of the inherent dignity and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.

Human dignity is about human worth, a sense of self worth. Means to be valued respected for what you are, who you are and what you believe in, how you live.

What is human dignity in the Bible determines that “ Human dignity originates from God and is of God because we are made in God’s own image and likeness (Gn 1:26-27). … Human beings have transcendent worth and value that comes from God; this dignity is not based on any human quality, legal mandate, or individual merit or accomplishment”.

Article 1. Universal Declaration Of Human Rights “The dignity of the human person is not only a fundamental right in itself but constitutes the real basis of fundamental rights”.

The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrined human dignity in its preamble: ‘Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ In its judgment of 9 October 2001 in Case C-377/98 Netherlands v European Parliament and Council [2001] ECR I-7079, at grounds 70 — 77, the Court of Justice confirmed that a fundamental right to human dignity is part of Union law.

Consequently none of the rights laid down in the Charter may be used to harm the human dignity of another person.  Therefore Human Dignity (Human Rights) are to be respected, even where a right is restricted.

Therefore when it comes to the Governments COVID-19 Restrictions, human rights are to be respected even though restrictions are in place.

Human rights are what make us human. They are the principles by which we create the sacred home for human dignity.

During this era of globalization the issue around Human Rights has become a complexity. UN Member Nation Governments and the Un itself pose grave threats and serious violations on human rights.

The Evil Chinese Communist Regime are busy making the UN into an image of itself and this is being promoted and welcomed.  The Chinese Communist Regime commit the worst Human Rights violations in the world. Yet they sit at the head of the UN Security Council that has the authority to investigate Human Rights Violations. No criminal court in the world has the power to criminalize the CCP for their evil crimes against humanity. The UN have rewarded the CCP permanent veto rights to do as they like, when they like and to whom they like.

The CCP have imprisoned millions of Chinese people and others over decades, tortured, forced sterilizations, forced abortions, rapes  and live organ harvesting, where they have a huge data base where they are able to search live body parts to use for their live organ harvesting.

The ACT Party recently introduced a motion into New Zealand Parliament opposing the CCP’s Genocide and imprisonment of the Uyghur Muslims in China.  The Labour Party would not agree to the motion until the word ‘Genocide was removed from the motion. Eventually it was, and the motion was passed.

Those that are perpetrating, violating human rights globally are an integration of the globalized elite and corporate institutions that are collaborating with the UN and UN Member Nation governments

Children have the rights to food, shelter, clothing, health care, and emotional well-being as do adults, and these rights we affirm as theirs regardless of actions or inactions of their parents or guardians. In particular, children must be protected from economic, physical, and sexual exploitation and abuse”. Yet under New Zealand’s education systems they are being mentally abused, indoctrinated sexualized and made to feel guilty about their identity.

Children are being taught through the bludgeoning of fear tactics. The world is going to prematurely end, it’s the baby boomers fault. Divide and conquer the family and at the same time mentally abuse the children. Human rights belong to all Humankind.

Yet the United Nations and all its UN Member Nation governments are fully aware that 12yr old children carry weapons for ISIL and are made to fight for Islamic terrorist groups. If these children try to escape they are tortured, raped and trafficked and often murdered.

UN Troops themselves have been known to rape, traffic children and women whilst in host countries where they are stationed, are involved in sexual slavery. They are not imprisoned. UN  themselves have also been known to take part in these horrific crimes against women and children. There is a growing sex slavery industry, trafficking boys and girls for labour, prostitution, sex slavery.  NZ Politicians the propaganda machines will not report on this.  All happening under the veil of COVID19, lives are being lost and destroyed, lives of children.  Wake Up New Zealand.

...

THE DEATH OF HUMAN DIGNITY

We talk of death, the dying with Human Dignity. Today we are living in what I call a death cult.

Extreme Abortion and assisted suicide Acts have been introduced as the bludgeoning of fear of deaf and harm from what is a human experiment lies like a dark cloud over everyone’s head.

Never before has the Human Race been mandated to be participants of Human Experiments.   Human Dignity has a death sentence. The  fundamental Core to all human rights laws includes Human Dignity

You lose your freedom to think for yourself, have your own opinion, to able to express your own opinion, Take this away and your destroy ones unique identity as a human being. Your destroy their human dignity.

There is no human dignity where an elderly person who is failing in health is neglected by family members and they just want to get out of here. Acts new law will have these serious risks.

All about benefits and risks, the evidence base is Data in and data out.    Data in and Data to control your life from the cradle to the grave.

There is no Human Dignity where a failed aborted baby can be born alive, left to die with no medical attention on the hospital table. Desensitizing and dehumanizing human life itself.

Think Socialism, Marxism, Communism think destruction. Destruction of Human Rights, values and the introduction of warped morals.

...

POPPING THE BUBBLE

A report produced by the ‘Copenhagen Vaccine Industry’ documented in September 2019 the ‘Global Vaccine Plan’ was to come to an end in 2020, that a new global strategy for vaccines, immunization was needed.

On September 16th 2019 the global strategy for vaccines was sent to SAGE

SAGE introduced a handbook of international marketing, a global competitive marketing strategy.

The IA 2030 document that will be presented to SAGE entailed the new vision and strategies for vaccines and immunization for the next decade.

The Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030) set an ambitious overarching global vision and strategy for vaccines in UN Agenda 21 also.

The World Health Organization (UN) provided a mandate to provide leadership on global policies, standards and norms to support U N Member countries to national programs this includes the global strategy of vaccines.

...