THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR TE PATI MAORI’S AGGRESSION
Carol Sakey June 19, 2025
APARTHEID IN NZUncategorized

THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR TE PATI MAORI’S AGGRESSION

Since Anthropology emerged as a scientific discipline in the 19th Century the coined phrase Indigenous and Tribal Peoples have been a major focus. According to the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues there is reported to be 370 Million so called Indigenous people in 90 countries globally (Reported By the UN). Approx 70% live in Asia. There is reported to be 5,000 ethnic Cultures of Indigenous People

The Rights & Interests of so called Indigenous Peoples are recognized through various International Declarations Eg; 1989 Internation Labor Org., Convention (No 169) * 1992 UN Convention on Biological Diversity * 2007 UN Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) The UNDRIP covers Civil, * Political * Economic *Social * Cultural *Environmental Rights & Interests under International Law (Also Human Rights Laws)

The UNDRIP imposes Obligations , Commitments on UN Member States, Organizations & Inter-governmental bodies. Included is the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs http://www.iwgia.org/culture-and-identity/ identification-of-indigenous-people)  Also a growing body of Human Rights Entities

The Diversity of Indigenous peoples was adopted by the UN System, where a modern understanding of this was utilized worldwide. The modern understanding of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples met the following criteria by the UN as ‘Self-Identification ‘ *Historical continuity with Pre-colonial History and / or Pre-Settler Societies * Accepted by their Tribal Community  *Ancestral environment.  Indigenous Peoples were historically referred to as Tribal or Native Peoples

There is Official Universal definition of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples in International Law. (UN). Although various UN Agencies and International NGOs- Corporations etc., with self interests also Central/Local Govts of UN Nations States have utilized the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples as to Regulations- Policies- Political and Monetary self -interests.

In the 1970’s the coined phrase was used as a way of linking experiences, issues, struggles of groups- ( De-Colonization). The first meeting of the UN Working Group of Indigenous Populations (WGP) took place 9/8/1982. Is now celebrated as the International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People. Again – No definition of Indigenous People was adopted by the UN Agency. The Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous issues stated.

In the “concept of Indigenous Peoples the prevailing view today, is that there is No Formal Universal Definition on the term ‘Indigenous Peoples – given that a single definition will inevitably be with or with (over or under) inclusiveness- thus making sense in some societies but not in others”. However a number of UN Agencies have used the term Indigenous Peoples on Statements, coverages for certain International Agreements (But these are definitions used for particular reports)

Another example is that the Inter-American Commission On Human Rights doesn’t provide a definition of Indigenous Peoples, but have stated that ‘Self-identification’ as being a fundamental criteria’.  Manvir Singh an  Anthropologist states there’s a lack of coherence, inconsistencies  in which ethnic groups are called Indigenous or not. People argue the term. Have pressure put on them to self identify themselves as Indigenous People’. Thus erasing Identification. This varies from one country to another. Adding – There is no accepted Universal Definition of  the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples

The UN ILO International Labour Org., twice adopted definitions of Indigenous Peoples at their Conventions in 1957 & 1989. Only a few countries acknowledged it therefore could not be used in International Law. Only by the countries that adopted the definition. The World Bank  definition of Indigenous People is not Binding by International law as it is determined within Banks Operational Policies * Policy Guidelines. Documents and Agreements of ‘Good Faith’

UN Agenda 21 (1992) recognized the potential contribution in using the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples referring to Sustainable Development. The 2024 UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 16) UN Nation States agreed to a new permanent body for Indigenous Peoples. Which allows them to advise COP members on Biodiversity (An Indigenous worldview) on Sustainability.

From the UN 1993 World Conference on Human Rights- the  (UN Vienna Declaration ) was adopted- recognizing the culture of Indigenous Peoples. Described as a ‘Strong Commitment to – Economic *Social*Cultural Wellbeing. (The enjoyment of the Fruits of Sustainable Development)  9th August 1994 UN proclaimed as International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People (Their Rights & Interests) 1995 UN launched the Decade of the Worlds Indigenous Peoples. (UN Resolution 49/214) Furthering-Advancing the Global Agenda

The UN in 2021 referenced the UN Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples. To be documented into International laws Namely ‘Under the Umbrella of Social Justice. Dystopia ‘ Some Animals have more rights than others.

Te Pati Maori’s strong connection to the UNDRIP (Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indifenous Peoples). First adopted on  13th September 2007  at the New York UN Assembly. It had taken 20 + years to draft. There was much debate and discussion during this time on the UNDRIP by the working group at the UN

. Te Pati Maori actively engage in the Principles of the UNDRIP (Seld Governance). With Te Tiriti o Waitangi committed to the UNDRIP. Several Kerero Constitutional Conventions held at Auckland University. Preplanning the embedding of the UNDRIP into NZs Constitutional Arrangements. The UNDRIP being a crucial tool for Iwi/Maori Self-Governance

Although NZ Rejected the UNDRIP in 2007 – John Key and Pita Sharples Deputy leader of the Maori Party made a deal. Under a veil of secrecy Pita Sharples attended the UN and adopted the UNDRIP for NZ. When John Key was asked by the secrecy his response was “I did not want to spoil Pita Sharples Thunder’. New Zealand’s have no say when it comes to the State adopting International Laws. NZ is a party to some 1900 International Agreements.

Although the UNDRIP is Non-Binding there is also a commitment, obligation to pursue it, implement it. Its not legally Legislative. Sit outside Hard Law  as a Soft Law, can be used– called upon- referenced by the Judicial. Unless it is embedded in NZ Domestic Laws its Non Binding. (But there are  serious implications when it comes to implementing the UNDRIP in NZ.

It all lies in the 2007 UNDRIP adoption in the New York UN Assembly where Rosemary Banks Representative of NZ shared with the assembly why NZ would not adopt it. Its extremely important to know why because this is the real reason for the Hikoi. For David Seymour being attacked. Spoiling Te Pati Maori and their activist collaborators thunder for their self interested preplanning for their future self  interests. (The reasons for the insame aggressive behavior in Parliament)

Lets get to the root of the course.. Firstly the UNDRIP adoption into legislation is crucial for the Self Governance of Iwi/Maori. UNDRIP is a crucial tool- a weapon of aggression… NZ * US * Canada * Australia did not ratify the Declaration at this time…Rosemary Banks was NZs Representative at the UN New York Assembly at the time.

She explained to the gathering why NZ would not sign the UNDRIP. (1) It gives Indigenous Peoples Control- ownership of Entire Lands of NZ (2) Did not take into account that people already legally-lawfully owned land (Had Property Rights)  (3)Redress- Compensation for Entire Lands of NZ (Ownership- Control of All NZs Natural Resources (4) Veto Rights Over Legislation  (5) Two Classes of Citizenship).

Winston Peters states NZ First will dump the UNDRIP (That’s not happened yet). David Seymour is skirting around the edges not talking about the UNDRIP. But targeting how Farmers are having to seek Cultural Rights on their lands by  Iwi Tribal Groups. And that Council.

Such as Auckland Council has an Iwi Advisory Independent Group where people , businesses, farmers have to seek their advice on Resource Management Consents. (Co-Governance – Veto Rights are already (still) being implemented. ACT PARTY now have a Petition online to Dump Te Mana Te Wai it appears regulations, rules are being made by those whom have Iwi/Maori ancestry

Race Based Politics. Critical Race Theory is rife in New Zealand right throughout the system. Education.. Politics.. Society..Environment.. Health. This is not a Healthy situation for NZ. If we remain quiet  about this then we enable it. We must speak up. Ignore being character assassinated as Racist. Don’t self censor and don’t be censored. This is Separatism- not unity- this is Apartheid

WakeUpNZ

Researcher: Cassie

...
Read More

Other Blog Posts

CRITICAL THEORY AND THE CORPORATE CAPTURE OF NEW ZEALAND
Carol Sakey June 13, 2022
ARDERN AND HER POLITICAL CRONIESCORPORATE CAPUTRECRITICAL THEORY

CRITICAL THEORY AND THE CORPORATE CAPTURE OF NEW ZEALAND

I have to ask how much do New Zealanders know about the Worth Trade Organization. The World Economic Forum, most of us have heard about the 4th Industrial Revolution ‘The Great Reset’.  How much do we relly know about NZ Parliament and their membership to the International Parliamentary Union? I sure as hell did not know the IPU existed.

Under the veil of COVID19 their is massive corruption and purposeful destruction happening in New Zealand.  This is just one of the many video I will continue to produce to hopefully wake those up who have not yet really woken up.  As a retired person I have the time, the need to share because I really care about my fellow human beings.  All I ask is that you keep sharing the links to my website and the continuous information I provide. There is no cost $$ attached, these are heart gifts.  Please support family, loved ones, friends and acquaintances who are struggling through these times.    Well resourced information, sharing, caring and loving in Christian ways  is about promoting self-empowerment – not walking in anothers shoes.

 

Please click on the image above which will direct you to my video on ‘Critical Theory and the Corporate Capture of New Zealand’. God Save New Zealand.

 

...
Read More
CAN’T SEE THE WOOD BECAUSE OF THE TREE’S ‘ THE HIDDEN TRUTH ‘
Carol Sakey June 9, 2022
NEW ZEALAND HISTORY

CAN’T SEE THE WOOD BECAUSE OF THE TREE’S ‘ THE HIDDEN TRUTH ‘

Sharing a very interesting article found on facebook social media.  I had read stories about the following however below is another story the government and Iwi Elite prefer you did not know about documented by Raynor Capper.  Oviously this will not be taught in history lessons within the school educational curriculum. Ardern is committed to destroying millions of books and replacing them with digital libraries…To expose the ruth about histories would destroy ‘Critical Theory’ which involves the evil destruction of all nations globally, where no-one can escape the world of Identity Politics. (The world of Oppressor vs Opressed. People their own worst enemy- everyone resentful and dam miserable as they wallow in victimhood) and Disinformation Campaigns- A murky blend of truth and lies). Hence we cannot see the wood because of the tree’s. ‘The Hidden Truth’

New Zealand History – The Truth added 11 new photos to the album: Hidden Wonders in Waipoua Forest.

tnSperodos80760rtfc45al1 o420b,t1ue100tlf6 O2 
Undeniable Proof of NZ Civilisation Before Kupe
The huge 25,000 acre plus area covered by Waipoua Forest in Northland is a massive archaeological treasure trove, where once a large population lived, gardened, worshipped, raised their families and died. The stone structures in the forest had been noted and written about by early Europeans, who wondered about the stone builders who had lived there. In 1983 archaeologists from Auckland University were employed by the NZ Forest Service to investigate and document these ancient structures, prior to tree felling in the area. The area under investigation was limited, confined to about 500 acres and split into five sections on both sides of the Waipoua River. It was a ‘drop in an ocean,’ but a start, a chance to document and protect the country’s heritage, to tell the people of New Zealand about an ancient civilisation, predating Polynesian settlement and acknowledged as such by the Pacific voyagers who came after them.
But most of the people of New Zealand do not know what was found in Waipoua Forest over the three year investigation, at a cost to the taxpayer then of $500,000. The detailed mapping and notes of the complex of stone walls, hearths, stone structures defined as altars by the archaeologists, incised obelisks, petroglyphs (rock carvings), standing stone circles, circular stone mounds and stone-lined waterways was instead sent away to remain hidden under a 75 year embargo, restricted until 2063. In 1988, archaeological records on the Waipoua Forest excavations were transferred from Kaikohe to the National Archives in Auckland. The Transfer of Archives form states: “Prior consultation requires approval of the Te Roroa-Waipoua Archaeological Advisory committee or other appropriate subsequent Te Roroa authority.” Te Roroa iwi around that time were engaged in a land claim of the Maunganui Bluff and Waipoua No 2 block with the Waitangi Tribunal. The transfer agreement was modified to include a 75 year moratorium and signed by DOC archaeologist Michael Taylor. It specified a 14 page index identifying all the material to be embargoed.
At the end of the archaeological excavations, all public access to the area was denied. Visitors wanting to see the stone artefacts were turned away. DOC denied access requests by historians and archaeologists, while members of the public were threatened by certain locals when they went to view the ‘stone city.’ Reasons given by DOC was that the area had been declared tapu and that it was under a Waitangi Treaty claim. Meanwhile, people who knew what was hidden in the forest waited for the release of the report on the excavations. They knew it was a significant site for the history of New Zealand. Noel Hilliam was with a group who had seen some of the radiocarbon dating data. He heard Ned Nathan (Te Roroa) exclaim “that’s 500 years before we got here!” (‘We’ referring to Maori)
In 1996, archaeological researcher Dr Gary Cook successfully challenged the legality of the embargo. Submissions to the Ombudsman lead to the release of the large body of material, but the radio carbon dates were absent. When questioned as to why the information had been hidden, The New Zealand National Archives stated that there were no access restrictions, but after numerous Official Information requests from people all around New Zealand, Associate Minister of Conservation the Hon. Phillida Bunkle confirmed that between 1988 and 1996, Te Roroa authorities fully controlled the archaeological results. She wrote: “I am advised that the papers referred to in the recent documentary were lodged in Archives without the knowledge or authority of the Department of Conservation…my department has no specific information about the restriction placed on the papers by a member of the local iwi, Te Roroa and lifted in 1996. Until then, I understand, only persons with written permission from the Pahinui Marae, near Dargaville, could gain access to the archival material. This has not been the case since 1996. In summary, the papers referred to in the recent documentary are readily available. The copies lodged with National Archives were released from formal embargo in 1996.”
But the files finally released were incomplete. There was a vital report missing from samples tested at the Radiocarbon Testing Laboratory at the University of Waikato. Data already released showed material from the excavation fell within the known occupancy of modern Maori.(The official Government date for the arrival of the first people, from Eastern Polynesia, is the late 13th century. Kupe is said to have featured in the 14th century.) But there was no sign of the data showing the much earlier date. Then, in a strange twist, this file surfaced, sent anonymously to Hokianga historian Joan Leaf, who with Noel Hilliam, had complained about the lack of access to the information in a Radio Pacific interview in 1996. The data from a food midden at Motuhuru showed a True Age date of 950 plus or minus 50. This was the missing report exclaimed over by Ned Nathan, on a 1000 year old cat’s eye shell, collected from a midden by Michael Taylor in 1986. The readings confirmed there were people living in the area now called Waipoua Forest when the ancestors of modern Maori arrived. On the same file was another reading of a pipi shell, collected from a midden excavated at Kokohuia, Omapere by Michael Taylor. It also carried the radiocarbon date of 900 plus or minus 50 years.
The figures are finally in but the truth is still out. Out of the public eye and out of official, public acknowledgement of the huge historic site that is sheltered by the Waipoua Forest. What lies hidden there speaks of a long ago race of stone builders and the ancient Waitaha Tawhito who followed and integrated to form one people. Even with many stone structures buried in a deep humus layer, the vast area where the ancient people lived is awe inspiring. At one site alone, an extensive garden area is surrounded by collapsed stone dwellings and places of worship, speaking of thousands living there in peace for a great length of time. Boundary markers separate various garden plots, with stone cairns set at even distances to provide growing places for yam. The gardens run down to the Waipoua River, where a unique microclimate and soil types would have encouraged kumara and gourd to thrive.
Amid the gardens, an astonishing discovery was made, a massive stone bearing a rectangular pattern of deeply cut grooves. At the base of the stone is one single curved line. The straight lines could have been caused by natural weathering and cracking, but this curved line was clearly shaped by a human hand. What does this ancient petroglyph signify? It looks uncannily like the carved shape of a sailing ship with its curved base and extended masts. But there is another possible explanation, proposed by Australian archaeo-astronomer Alan Seath. Alan took sightings through a compass and said that the petroglyph was a plan of the gardens, with the curved line indicating the western boundary. He indicated a direction as to where the boundary markers would be found. Within 20 metres a line of low stone cairns arranged in a curve were found, skirting the edge of a gully. On that basis, it seems likely that the other carved lines represented other garden markers. This is an astounding find and yet the petroglyph stone was not mentioned anywhere in the released documents on the DOC Waipoua Forest excavations
by Raynor Capper
...
Read More
THE COLLABORATION OF PARLIAMENTS WORLDWIDE.
Carol Sakey June 9, 2022
Global Governance

THE COLLABORATION OF PARLIAMENTS WORLDWIDE.

Connecting parliaments worldwide is influenced, promoted by New Zealand Parliament. The global influence during the 53rd NZ Parliament held at the Orakei Marae in November 2019.(Source Parliamentary Office of the Clerk).   NZ Parliament launched a refreshed parliamentary relationship strategy for International engagements and activities (3rd Pacific Parliamentary Platform)

NZ Politicians in the toilet bowl of Wellington ‘ connecting parliaments globally’ is key work within Parliament. Trevor Mallard stated “our international connections are more vital than ever” when he referred to COVID19 and parliaments operations pertaining to this.

David Wilson clerk of the House heads Parliaments secretariat of the Clerk, once a NZ First MP. The Clerks office alongside Parliamentary Services runs an induction program every three years, where new MPs get to hear about some of the in’s and outs of parliament. David Wilson  was prior to this a Te Atatu NZ First MP spoke about the International Parliaments connections saying “this is vitally important, we can share, learn from each others experiences.

“This includes a range of person to person and virtual meeting engagement globally, this is effective and most relevant”  IPR equates to International Parliamentary Relations.  Collaborating parliamentary systems, to strengthen them as to political developments and opportunities. The IPR system is run by Mallard, speaker of the house. The IPU meet twice per yr. Promotes NZ Parliament internationally

There are 179 member parliaments of the IPU (International Parliamentary Union)  and 13 Associate members.  They cover a wide range of issues, social, economical, political, they all have at lease one thing in common, and that’s promoting-accelerating UN Agenda 2030 Global Developments Goals.

The global Multistakeholder Corporate Capturing Advertising Marketing Campaign. The restructuring of the UN which led to the official strategic partnership of the UN & World Economic Forum on 13th June 2019.  Hence a One World Public-Private Corporate Governance was adopted to ‘leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age on this planet’ Namely documented as the ‘Decade Of Action 2020-2030.

The global destruction of the Free Market Economy to accelerate and expand Multistakeholderism world wide, a corporate capture of society and the economy.  A massive task of behaviour, social  re-engineering of billions of people on this planet to redesign the way people think, what they believe consequently what consumer goods and services they will choose.

They get to choose your diet, what you spend your money on. Each International Parliamentary Union Assembly decides on Emergency Resolutions as to Immediate Global Issues.  The 141st International Parliamentary Union Assembly was held in Belgrade. Kieran McAnuility attended. (MP for Labour Wairarapa) The theme of this event was ‘Strengthening International Law’

New Zealand’s IPU chair is Vanushi Walters. Labour MP for Upper Harbor Auckland.  Newsfeeds:- NZ Parliament is now the best in the world for LGBTQ (Source IPU).  Socialist International dated 30th March 2015- The IPU Assembly in Hanoi. The 132nd Assembly of the IPU 28th March- 1st April 2015. The League Of Nations actually supported the pathway towards Socialism

The aim, goal being to shape a World Parliament. The Global Elite of global power structures that determine every part of human, animal and plant life.  A extremely wealthy  transnational global elite.  The World Parliament October 24th 2021 celebrating the 8th Annual Week for World Parliament. The call for a democratically elected World Parliament, for Open and Inclusive Discussion in the Halls Of Power.

On reforms to the system of Global Governance in order to make it more effective. Stating National governments failed pandemic and climate change demands, actions. We need a one global institution. A global institution to solve global threats that exists in a multilateral order. “We need a democratic World Parliament’

NZ’s own NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 BORA does not protect NZ Citizens Rights. It has limitations . Parliament use key words such as reasoning and justification to define just what this means, whether or not that applies to NZ Citizens.  NZ Parliament key member of IPU.

As far as NZ Citizens are concerned a One Global Parliaments would be a un-elected one as far as NZ Citizens are concerned.  Not voted in by NZ Citizens.  Therefore this is totally unacceptable. This one world system of a Global Parliament that shapes who gets what and when about economy and society. Defining rights and affecting identities. Complete control an imperial force that would be almost too difficult to reverse. Coercive, demanding, indoctrinating,  manipulating and controlling- restrictive enforcement of all peoples on this planet. It’s the members of parliament themselves and the PM that needs to be democratically controlled.  They are the peoples servants we are not their servants.

International Parliamentary Union has globally made a commitment to all peoples on this planet becoming global citizens, to destroy national citizenship. To replace National sentiment for your own country.  A Global Stage dominated by Corporate Captured self interests. An International Law that does not question the authority of states to terminate our National Citizenship to replace it with a Global Citizenship.

NZ Govt UNESO Global Citizenship Awards for Education $3,000 cash prize money.  Since 2013 more than 2,400 New Zealanders have been awarded the Prime Ministers- Global Citizenship Awards. . Young people leave NZ shores as NZ Citizens and return holding Global Citizenship.

The post-pandemic – The next phase  of Global Citizenship education. Expanding citizenship beyond National Borders can serve as a blueprint for a new form of global citizenship a ‘post pandemic citizen’. The Pandemic has redesign the way people live their lives has been extremely challenging and demanding as governments in countries worldwide have pushed, expanded upon their inter-dependency of the UN/WEF.

In 2014 the EU created a lasting shared identity namely ‘common citizenship status for citizens of EU Member States. Corporations, large companies have spread to all parts of the world. The negative  impacts of this is enormous, higher unemployment, less innovation as small businesses and farming communities are swallow up in this destructive force.  The deterioration of health, safety and working environments.

A growing disparity between the rich and the poor worldwide. Worldwide countries will go into recession, global financial institutions will fail.

Adding global citizenship to text and resource books in primary and secondary schools nurtures, indoctrinates globally mined students’ Prepares them for Global Citizenship.  Pandemic protecting inclusively, a self-sacrifice to protect individual interests.   Wealth instead of Health, Political Authoritarianism over Human Rights and Civil Liberties.

Governments worldwide, International Parliaments collaborating using predicted data, wellbeing indicators, biases, passive research to provide International Parliaments the informational data gathered to support totalitarian states. Tyranny.   There are always Trade Offs. Academia/Govt. Govt provides funds for research . You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours

Global Citzenship includes Vaccinate the World. UN Global Strategy Of Vaccine 2019. The Decade of Action: 2020-2030. Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. Global Citizenship a one script for all.

This blog is produced by Carol Sakey  https:wakeupnz.org

NOTE: If you have not subscribed to my website as yet please do so now. Thank you

...
Read More
LOOKING AT NZ THREE WATERS REFORM FROM ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE. 
Carol Sakey June 9, 2022
THREE WATERS REFORM

LOOKING AT NZ THREE WATERS REFORM FROM ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE. 

The watering down of Universal Rights. The Corporate Capture of water and the influence on water policies by the UN /WEF.  We need to look beyond refocus our attentions beyond New Zealand to see what is really going on in our own country.

Water is essential to every part of our everyday life. Without water we would simply die.  However the private sector interests in the UN are seeking planning, succeeding in making a massive profit from water.  Private interests active within UN Nations. To treat water as a tradeable   commodification, turn it into a financial product for financially profitability.

This was pushed and promoted before the Rio+20 through a range of UN initiatives and partnerships with large businesses and corporations. Backed by governments and businesses groups to push market forces as a solution to water supplies. (Threatening the status of water and sanitation as a universal rights, as was recognised by the UN General Assembly resolution 64/292.

This means access to water would depend on the ability to actually pay for it, millions if not several billion people cannot afford to pay for water and there is nothing to stop water charges from increasing to a heightened level.  This will cause enormous problems.   Be aware of NZ Three Waters Reform, what is happening in New Zealand is happening in this globalized one script world of UN Agenda 2030 global development goals.

There is within history of societies standing up for their water rights. The Un was established as a place for defending the common good, human rights for ALL and our Common Future. Now the UN allows for private interests in the form of corporations.   This accelerated even further when the UN and World Economic Forum that represents Multistakeholderism joined forces (The strategic partnership of the UN and WEF June 13th 2019) The Decade of Action 2020-2030. Leave no-one behind.

Hence the infiltration of corporate interests, corporate capture in the field of water policy embedded in the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs.   2.Global corporate influence has permeated the UN in a number of ways. The UN Secretary Generals Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation (UNSGAB) 106. Was set up to galvanize global action on water and sanitation issues, central to the world eradicating poverty achieving UN Agenda 2030 SDGs

More than a quarter of its 23 members have direct links to private water companies, other advocate the liberalization and privatization of water resources. The include high profile figures eg President of Suez and president of Aquafed.(The International Federation of Private Water Operators).

Richard Torkelson, a finance specialist with experience in water privatization projects. Finncial working groups chaired by individual members  of financing working groups for ‘sustainable cost recovery for water delivery. More inter-dependency between water and the green economy

The Annual Water Forum speaks on behalf of water operators, businesses that go hand in hand with the UN. The CEO Water Mandate established as part of the UN Global Compact. (The UNs largest voluntary corporate accountability initiative) in 2007.  A  ‘unique public-private initiative designed to assist companies in the development, implementation, and disclosure of water sustainability policies and practices’.

Includes some of the planets biggest water polluters and abusers who use this corporate supported platform to promote their goals within the UN System.  Members companies eg; Nestles, Violia Water, Coca-Cola etc., As they call for  ‘Corporate Water Stewardship’ for mass profits and competitive advantage. This is what UN and UN Nation Member Govts call ‘Defending Water Rights’

Included initiatives are targeting farmers, throwing them under the tractor, the govt using the farmer as the whipping boy to reward Three 3.Waters Reform.. UN Agenda 2030 SDGS. A global leftist, socialist Marxist advertising marketing plan to place massive financial rewards in the pockets of promoters of multistakeholderism.  The intentional massive growing and promoting of companies within government around water policies.

The UN Global Compact enabling companies to secure huge advantages and massive profits at the publics expensive is legitimized as a CEO mandate. Promoting private market systems for water delivery and access- UN Global Compact. Voluntary non-biding in nature, UN Nation Govts and Large businesses, corporation commit to it.

These commitments are not checked or evaluated by independent experts. Problem is we never know these days who are the independent experts.   UN promote preferred standards and tools for UN Member States. Mandating corporations, large companies to mandate ‘Green’ activities, as they hide damaging impacts caused by large businesses, corporation under the UN / WEF Flag.

Govts that are suppose to regulate companies are instead hosting a massive initiative created by and for corporations, large businesses, this is not about public interests its about supreme power and always follow the money.

Cocoa-Cola, Unilever, Dow, etc., included in the formation of this UN/WEF strategic partnership.  Water has become an algorithm on the stock markets.  Dow and many other large companies, corporations have not fulfilled their obligations following the contamination of water. Coca-Cola has faced severe criticism for levels of water extraction in India, depleting water levels and causing problems for local communities.

Aquafed, the World Water Council and the Global Water Partnership. Partners must be non-profit organizations, this does not prevent umbrella organization that represent large companies from joining.

The content of the Third World Water Development Report. A former director of the World Water Council also presided over a private water consultancy firm.  Had direct access and strong influence over the highest level of the UN (CEO Water mandate- UNOP and UNSGAB- all coming under the direct authority of the UN Secretary General) on water management issues globally.  Corporate investment involvement in water policy management has increased within the UN this started in the 1990’s with the UN Seeking corporate funding.

The introduction of the UN Global Compact in 2000 marked a shift from a regulatory approach to a voluntary one. Member UN States have supported this shift and promoted it.  Rio +10 World Summit on Sustainable Development referred to the “world’s biggest trade fair” by UN Development Programme (UNDP) official Mark Malloch-Brown

The World Business Council for Sustainability Development (WBCSD) lobbied on behalf of the water industry for powerful members to include Veolia, Coca-Cola, Dow Chemicals etc., Theme ‘Water for the poor. The acceleration of public-private partnerships between Govts and large businesses-corporations. To facilitate private investment as a new strategy for delivery of efficient water and sanitation services. The UN/WEF deliberate plan. Had been well planned years before.

UN General Ban Ki Moon has praised business’ “integral role in delivering economic and social progress. The World Business Council noted  “succeeded in elevating water issues up the business agenda by increasing awareness among opinion leaders and decision makers.  The Green Economy- Corporate Capture of nature itself. Corporations putting a price on nature. Market based approached an introduction of water markets, pricing for water for agriculture and full cost pricing.  5.Access to water would no longer be a fundamental human right but water would become a profit driven business. This would be a direct attack on water justice and limit access to drinking water for millions if not  billions of people.

The Three Waters Reform look beyond New Zealand for the true facts it lies withing globalization. The UN World Toilet Day. The Three Waters Reform must be flushed down the loo. This is the crap work of those that seek supreme power and massive profits over  New Zealanders interests.  This is another perspective to what is going on beyond our focus levels within our country

THE UNITED NATIONS INTRODUCES WORLD TOILET DAY – In 2001, the World Toilet organisation established World Toilet Day and was declared an official UN day in 2013 AND THE CRAP CONTINUES TO BE DISHED OUT AS THE MULTITUDES WORLDWIDE BECOME BOGGED DOWN IN THE GLOBAL BOG BULLSHITE

Carol Sakey. WEBSITE – https:wakeupnz.org

 

...
Read More