CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

WEALTH BEFORE HEALTH- REFERS TO THE NZ GOVERNMENTS ‘AI’ PARTNERSHIP PROJECT WITH THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM

An AI dictated future, a future in which our every move, our every word, our every relationship is trackable, traceable and data-mineable by unprecedented collaborations between government and tech giants.

It’s a future in which our every move, our every word, our every relationship is trackable, traceable and data-mineable by unprecedented collaborations between government and tech giants.

In Australia for instance, , there is a certain amount of disillusionment creeping into the e health debate (tele-medicine and tele-health). This is because long-standing issues relating to privacy, access to records, the competency of some bureaucracies charged with overseeing projects and questions about the adequacy

Telemedicine and telehealth standards are established by the same state-specific regulatory institutions that establish standards for in-person clinical treatment. … But despite federal adjustments to telehealth oversight, many aspects of telehealth regulation are still determined on a state-by-state level

Since providers can’t physically examine patients during virtual medical appointments, it’s harder to carry out a standard of care

There are various limitations to telehealth- Telemedicine visits are not a complete substitute for in-person visits; nor they are feasible for all patients or clinical situations. For example, technology does not always work smoothly, and technical difficulties may interfere with delivery of care
Panic, fear, anxiousness has swept away many peoples ability to use logical thought processes. For some a learned helpless to comply with isolation, distancing themselves from human contact from others.

Many people have been swept away by a tidal wave of panic, and this warmed-over dystopia have become acceptable of this AI acceleration into their lives, just taking it all for granted without thinking about the serious consequences., the huge impacts of a global AI totalitarianism that controls peoples lives, that stops them from seeking human comfort instead turning to an AI decision making algorithm.

This is NOT NORMAL, and the so called NEW NORMAL should never be acceptable to the Human Race.

Mass surveillance can be the killer of the human race, this application of deep learning. Isolation and the lack of human contact.

Please click on the arrow above in the image which will link you to my Rumble Video with more important information on ‘Telehealth’ which the New Zealand Government is promoting in their white paper project in their partnership with the World Economic Forum.

Please sign up to my website if you have not done so already, thank you.

...

NZ GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP WITH THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM ‘PRECISION FARMING’

REIMAGINING REGULATION FOR THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) PROJECT- NZ GOVERNMENT PARTNERING THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Precision Farming is also known as Smart Farming. Smart Farming like Smart Cities include significantly increased surveillance, monitoring of every aspect of your life.

Surveillance of non-humans and humans, the dual purpose of Smart Farming. Which leads to zilch freedom, your private life being highly monitored hence controlled by digital technology through Precision Farming/ Smart Farming.

‘Smart is increasingly a euphemism for surveillance. Cities in at least 56 countries worldwide have deployed surveillance technologies powered by automatic data mining, facial recognition, and other forms of artificial intelligence.
Urban surveillance is a multi-billion dollar industry, with Chinese and U.S.-based companies such as Axis, Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, and ZTE leading the charge.

Now digital totalitarianism goes rural. Thus supercharging surveillance, encroaching on free speech, privacy, and data protection.
Identity collection devices are commonplace, having exploded across public and private spaces. Shanghai recently installed Alibaba’s City Brain public surveillance system, which oversees over 1,100 biometric facial recognition cameras. A combination of satellites, drones, and fixed cameras grab over 20 million images a day.

The bus, metro, and credit cards of local residents are also traced in real time. And these tools are spreading. Chinese firms are busily exporting surveillance tech to Latin America, other parts of Asia, and Africa, helping enable what some critics call digital authoritarianism.

New Zealand Government has its surveillance strategy as to COVID 19 monitoring. Public Health Surveillance of public health and data.
New Zealand surveillance data provided by ESR, funded by the Ministry of Health with the cooperation of the diagnostic laboratories.

Ministry of Health support enables ESR to provide some specific additional work, prioritised on the basis of national benefit and we are happy to collaborate with funded projects to mine the surveillance data. How transparent is this and how private?

The new coronavirus pandemic and related lockdown measures triggered a significant increase in digital control over people in many countries.
Search your history books how totalitarianism has caused torture, famines, millions murdered, imprisoned through Totalitarian Dictatorships. Under Digital Global Inclusion is our individual uniqueness being annihilated, is Newland as a sovereign nation being annihilated deliberately so, to replace, denounce NZ Citizenship for Global Citizenship?

Farming is the backbone of New Zealand, it’s credible to question , is this White Paper Project that refers to the NZ Governments partnership with the World Economic Forum part of the Global Digital Playbook to destroy the backbone of New Zealand through Smart Cities, Smart Farming (Precision Farming)?

Wake Up New Zealand. Carol Sakey.
PLEASE GO TO THE ARROW ABOVE THAT WILL LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO TO MORE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON NZ GOVERNMENTS PARTNERSHIP WHITE PAPER WITH THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.

Please sign up to my website if you have not done so already and share this with your friends.

...

NZ GOVERNMENT PLAYS HUGE ROLE IN GLOBAL DIGITAL DICATORSHIP

Behind the closed doors of the political toilet bowl of Wellington the New Zealand Government is reaping its global glory as it promotes, makes plans and policies partnering with Google AI and the World Economic Forum and its UN official partnership with the UN.
International laws to control the planet, people and profit. The wealthy 0.01% of wealthy multistakeholder capitalist corporations, big tech, big pharma, Bayers-Monsanto GE seeds, Lab manufactured foods. A system, digital framework on a one global metric system that includes the now COVID19 restrictions right into year 2030.

The destruction of the world economy through COVID19 controls, restrictions – a window of opportunity to redesign your life, your diet the way you think, behave – live. The Government calls this ‘Unlocking New Zealand’s Digital Potential’. More censorship, more surveillance, trading privacy for security. A global Digital transformation…leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. From the cradle to the grave.
Everyone monitored, controlled by a Communist Chinese Social Credit System, rewards and punishments. Comply – don’t comply you lose your freedoms. Using the bludgeoning of fear to control the people. (Fear is a liar).

Legal Fictions are rife through data in and data out, global metric systems, data modelling biases, predictions. Real Science is under attack. Real history is under attack. The citizens of New Zealand are under attack. Free Speech is under attack.

To learn more about this please go to my Rumble Video link in the image above, Thank you.

...

MEDSAFE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AS TO SAFETY POST COVID19 JABS

How will Medsafe assess the short and long-term efficacy and/or safety of a COVID-19 vaccine?

Medsafe will apply its usual assessment criteria for the evaluation of any COVID-19 vaccine submissions. We will use international regulatory guidance in general, and advice specific to COVID-19 vaccines.

Efficacy is determined by the results of clinical trial(s) and studies on the types of immune response generated by the vaccine.
Safety data will be available from the clinical trials. As for all medicines, additional safety information will be gathered from long-term follow-up of clinical trial participants and safety monitoring.

Most information provided to Medsafe as part of a medicine application is confidential to the pharmaceutical company. However, some detail such as the qualitative product formulation, site of manufacture, and the data sheet will be published on Medsafe website when the vaccine is approved
How long will the vaccines work?

At this stage, we do not know how long a vaccine might work for.

Where can I find the clinical, safety, and quality data that Medsafe evaluated to approve COVID-19 vaccines?
Information submitted to and held by Medsafe as part of the approval process is confidential to the respective pharmaceutical companies
Provisional consent allows conditions to be imposed on the vaccine, restricting its use by healthcare professionals according to the data available at the time of approval. Provisional consent was included in the Medicines Act to allow New Zealand patients to have early access to medicines with a significant unmet clinical need.

What happens when the provisional consent for a COVID-19 vaccine expires?
Provisional consent was granted to all three currently approved COVID-19 vaccines for a period of nine months. Prior to expiry of this period, provisional consent may be renewed for a further period of up to two years, full consent may be granted, or the consent may not be renewed.
Medsafe has renewed the provisional consent for Comirnaty for a period of two years and the renewed consent is valid until 3 November 2023.
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety – Questions and Answers PUBLISHED 27TH November 2021 MEDSAFE WEBSITE https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/q-and-a-vaccine-safety.asp

PLEASE NOTE:-Should I be getting a COVID-19 vaccine while I am pregnant?
Currently, the Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine is the only COVID-19 vaccine available in New Zealand. There is limited data with the use of Comirnaty in pregnant women. Animal studies have not indicated direct or indirect harmful effects in pregnancy, development of the fetus or the newborn.

WHAT ADVERSE EVENTS AFTER JABS ARE- doctors, nurses, DHB staff, pharmacists required to report to the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM)?
There is no legal requirement for healthcare professionals to report adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs). However, we encourage healthcare professionals to report all AEFIs

ARE ADVERSE EVENTS OCCCURRING within a specified period after vaccination required to be reported to CARM?
There is no time limit for reporting adverse events.
Are adverse events listed by the vaccine manufacturer in the package inserts and data sheets required to be reported to CARM?
There is no legal requirement to report adverse events.

DOES THE JAB AFFECT FERTILITY:- Animal studies for the Comirnaty vaccine did not show any effect on fertility.

ARE THE COVID JABS SAFE FOR CHILDREN?..The Comirnaty vaccine is indicated for use in individuals aged 12 years and older. Clinical trials to assess safety and efficacy in children are ongoing.

WHAT MEDSAFE STUDIES HAVE MEDSAFE DONE.. to ensure the vaccine is safe for general use?
Medsafe does not conduct studies. Medsafe reviews the data submitted by the pharmaceutical company, including clinical trial data. See above for more information on the types of data that is required.

WHAT ARE THE ACCEPTABLE NUMBER OF SIDE EFFECTS? We encourage healthcare professionals and consumers to report any suspected side effect to a COVID-19 vaccine. For this reason, and because so many people will be receiving a vaccine, we expect many side effects to be reported.
Receiving large numbers of reports also indicates that the reporting system is working and easy to use.

Research and Data on vaccinating young people. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-vaccine-health-advice/covid-19-vaccine-and-children-information-parents-and-caregivers (US Wide- over 17 million 12-15yr ods in the US)

Immunization Advisory Centre. https://covid.immune.org.nz/faq/myocarditis-and-covid-19-vaccine-new-zealand
Myocarditis and the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand
An increased risk of heart inflammation (myocarditis, pericarditis, or both) has been observed in people who have received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in overseas studies, particularly in males under 30 years of age after the second vaccine dose.
After treatment, many patients live long, full lives free from the effects of myocarditis. For others, however, ongoing cardiovascular medication or even a heart transplant may be needed

Covid-19: Vaccinations for children aged 5 to 11 due to begin …
https://www.stuff.co.nz › … · Whakamāoritia tēnei whārangi
1 Haki 2021 — Vaccinations for children aged 5 to 11 years are expected to start before the end of January reportef Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins PLEASE NOTE WHAT MEDSAFE REPORTS AS TO SAFETY FOR CHILDREN POST COVID JABS- Do not state Safe or Not. Do not respond to safety post jab question as a Yes or No.

Covid-19: Pfizer vaccine approved for children aged 5-11…
Medsafe has granted provisional approval for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11 years old.
Pfizer has plans to trial the vaccine in children aged 6 months to 5 years, and Moderna has ongoing trials to test the safety and efficacy of vaccines in children under 12 years old.
Pfizer revealed that there were very few serious adverse events and no deaths during the phase 2 and 3 trials of children aged 5–12 years. He also explained that the side effects were similar to those that adults experience

October 29, 2021 https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-emergency-use-children-5-through-11-years-age

WHAT IS EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION ? An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Taking into consideration input from the FDA, manufacturers decide whether and when to submit an EUA request to FDA.
Once submitted, FDA will evaluate an EUA request and determine whether the relevant statutory criteria are met, taking into account the totality of the scientific evidence about the vaccine that is available to FDA.

https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/q-and-a-vaccine-approval.asp

...