Connecting Diverse Communities Report on 2007/08 public engagement A report on 15 meetings held around New Zealand to discuss diversity and social cohesion and responses to a written questionnaire August 2008. The views documented in this report are the views of the people who attended the Connecting Diverse Communities meetings held around the country. They are not the views of the Government, government agencies, Ministry of Social Development, Office of Ethnic Affairs or their staff. The purpose of the report being the summarising of the findings of the ‘Connecting Diverse Communities’ public engagement process. This process involved fifteen meetings held throughout New Zealand between August and November 2007, followed by a written survey that was sent to relevant organisations and available publicly. The majority of this report summarises the feedback received at the community meetings, while the responses from the survey can be found at Appendix 4. The meetings were organised by the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) and the Office of Ethnic Affairs (OEA) and were held in Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Napier, Palmerston North, New Plymouth, Wellington, Nelson, Christchurch and Dunedin. More than 500 people attended the meetings in total. The key objectives of the meetings were: • to engage with representatives of diverse communities around New Zealand (including ethnic and religious communities, iwi/hapū/Māori, Pākehā and Pacific Island peoples

Including in the content of this report was the following:-

Responses were subsequently transcribed and sent back to the meeting scribes for further comment and corrections, before being collated, analysed and used as material for this report. On four occasions, ie the Auckland Youth meeting, the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender or Intersex (GLBTI) meeting and the two Otara meetings. To hold dialogues with different peoples, to continue to communicate in times of celebration and adversity, and to influence others to be comfortable with diversity. We need to have more ‘conversations’ about social cohesion. • The media has an important role in this process. Take advantage of and celebrate diversity.  The Treaty of Waitangi as a foundation for intercultural respect. The role of schools in preparing young children to accept diversity as a ‘norm’ was often raised in the Connecting Diverse Communities meetings. Responses from the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Intersex (GLBTI) meeting…The GBLTI meeting, held in Wellington, was designed to allow participants to respond in a safe environment where their range of views was more likely to be expressed than if they were part of the local meetings. The questions were worded slightly differently and the responses are recorded below

Question 1.1 What do you think would help you create, maintain or strengthen your sense of ethnic, cultural and/or religious identity and community belonging in New Zealand? Question 1.2 What role can government play to support this?. Participants responded to the notion of diversity, identity and community by including sexual orientation and gender identity rather than just focusing on matters of ethnicity, culture or religion. Critical issues for the GLBTI community revolve around increasing their visibility and the levels of tolerance of GLBTI people in all communities. Two clear positions were articulated by participants in answer to the above two questions. They were: • While the local and central governments have a powerful influencing role in protecting GLBTI communities, local community groups have much more capacity to practise behaviours and attitudes that lead to GLBTI safety. Therefore, creating, maintaining or strengthening one’s sense of ethnic, cultural and/or religious identity and community belonging in New Zealand greatly relies on local community groups being in a position to deal with issues of sexual orientation and gender identity first. This requires a sustained and far-reaching education campaign that starts with schools but involves all members of local communities, including parents and local leaders

Government can play a critical role by increasing GLBTI visibility, rights and safety in the following ways: o Supporting the rights of GLBTI by enforcing their application in new policy development (such as developing ‘anti-hate-speech’ legislation), in current legislation (as expressed in the Human Rights Act) and in processes (such as GLBTI individuals being able to be counted in census data, household and crime and safety surveys). o Establishing a Ministry to deal with GLBTI issues, or at least a Ministerial portfolio for that purpose. o Establishing and funding a non-governmental body such as a Diversity Council to represent all minority groups. Such a body would be able to deal more readily with issues specific to GBLTI, such as assumptions about how different ethnicities respond to the GBLTI communities, their relationship to fundamentalist religious groups, or policy development involving their communities. o Resourcing, enforcing and monitoring programmes that support diversity (including sexual diversity) in schools (for example, through School Charters or by addressing cultural safety issues in curriculum delivery); in the media (for example, through TV and Radio Charters, or programming such as Māori TV’s Takataapui programme); and in the health sector (for example, through the Nursing Council’s cultural competencies – not just during training but also via in-service professional development – or by showing same-sex couples in health promotion TV ads). o Supporting student-led diversity initiatives in schools (e.g. against racism or gender bias).

There are LGBTI groups in schools that focus on sexual and gender diversity issues through the ‘School’s Out’ forum. However, these groups need more ethnically diverse input. o Acknowledging that GLBTI people face discriminatory practices from members of mainstream ‘straight’ society, including parents, schools, employers and employees – no matter what ethnicity or socio-economic circumstance they are in. Government has a role in lessening tension by addressing stereotypical attitudes and behaviour, such as refuting the perception that all LGBTQ people practise predatory behaviour or want to ‘recruit’ young people in schools, and by encouraging inclusive behaviour. o Establishing role modelling processes in government agencies so that there is an increasing awareness of cultural difference and safety in workplaces and in the health sector. o Supporting the development of more open leadership and providing more counselling information services for LGBTI people in cultural and ethnic communities. o Supporting celebrations like the Gay and Lesbian Fair ‘The Big Gay Out’ and the Hero Parade, that create awareness of LGBTQ issues and carve a space for the LGBTI community within the wider community, by funding or underwriting them in the same way that they might support ethnic festival development. o Supporting festivals that celebrate other cultures. Film festivals in particular, encourage the coming together of diverse groups (for example, the LGBTQ ‘Out Takes’ film festival).

LGBTI meeting responses Group question 2 was modified slightly to reflect the needs of the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transexual and Intersex participants. While many of the above summary responses apply to the GLBTI group, the responses below reflect other insights specific to these participants. Specific responses have been put into table form below

Question 2.1 – How well do you think people from diverse ethnic, religious and cultural communities interact with each other, for example in your neighbourhood, in GLBTI spaces, at work or through school? Question 2.2 – What do you think are the barriers to people mixing?

Question 2.2 Barriers include:

• The lack of identifiable spaces where it is safe to be LGBTQ+1.

• The visibility of LGBTQ+1 members is met by fearful and negative attitudes, non-acceptance and ignorance

• Migrants are not aware that New Zealand legally protects minority groups such as members of the LGBTQ+1 community

• There is a lack of opportunity to meet and discuss LGBTQ+I issues.

• There is a lack of opportunity to work on common tasks. • People don’t know how to discuss LGBTQ+1 matters in a frank, open and informative way. When there is an opportunity to do so, people do not recognise common ground as a starting point for interacting. The increasing pace of social change makes it harder to get to know people as people first

• Attacks on LGBTQ members by fundamentalist religious groups are a barrier. Some religious leaders want to eliminate GLBTI people altogether. The increasing diversity of the population and resulting increase in fundamentalism is a threat to GLBTI communities. Newcomers need to know New Zealand is first and foremost a secular country where there is freedom to worship.

• Marches and protests against LGBTQ communities.

• The use of derogatory terms and hate speech against LGBTQ communities.

• That the focus on sexual and gender diversity in schools tends to be Pākehā-dominated and needs to be more inclusive of other ethnic groups

https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/research/connecting-diverse-communities/cdc-public-engagement-2007.pdf

ARTICLE LOS ANGELES TIMES ‘AFTER BOTCHED SURGERY HE WAS RAISED AS A GIRL ‘GENDER EXPERIMENT’ (David Reimer Aged 38 years) Author Elaine Woo 13^th May 2004. David Reimer, the Canadian man raised as a girl for most of the first 14 years of his life in a highly touted medical experiment that seemed to resolve the debate over the cultural and biological determinants of gender, has died at 38. He committed suicide May 4 in his hometown of Winnipeg, Canada. At 8 months of age, Reimer became the unwitting subject of “sex reassignment,” a treatment method embraced by his parents after his penis was all but obliterated during a botched circumcision. The American doctor whose advice they sought recommended that their son be castrated, given hormone treatments and raised as a girl. The physician, Dr. John Money, supervised the case for several years and eventually wrote a paper declaring the success of the gender conversion. Known as the “John/Joan” case, it was widely publicized and gave credence to arguments presented in the 1970s by feminists and others that humans are sexually neutral at birth and that sex roles are largely the product of social conditioning. But, in fact, the gender conversion was far from successful. Money’s experiment was a disaster for Reimer that created psychological scars he ultimately could not overcome. Reimer’s story was told in the 2000 book “As Nature Made Him,” by journalist John Colapinto. Reimer said he cooperated with Colapinto in the hope that other children could be spared the miseries he experienced.

Reimer was born on Aug. 22, 1965, 12 minutes before his identical twin brother. His working-class parents named him Bruce and his brother Brian. Both babies were healthy and developed normally until they were seven months old, when they were discovered to have a condition called phimosis, a defect in the foreskin of the penis that makes urination difficult. The Reimers were told that the problem was easily remedied with circumcision. During the procedure at the hospital, a doctor who did not usually perform such operations was assigned to the Reimer babies. She chose to use an electric cautery machine with a sharp cutting needle to sever the foreskin. But something went terribly awry. Exactly where the error lay — in the machine, or in the user — was never determined. What quickly became clear was that baby Bruce had been irreparably maimed. (The doctors decided not to try the operation on his brother Brian, whose phimosis later disappeared without treatment.). The Reimers were distraught. Told that phallic reconstruction was a crude option that would never result in a fully functioning organ, they were without hope until one Sunday evening after the twins’ first birthday when they happened to tune in to an interview with Money on a television talk show. He was describing his successes at Johns Hopkins University in changing the sex of babies born with incomplete or ambiguous genitalia. He said that through surgeries and hormone treatments he could turn a child into whichever sex seemed most appropriate, and that such reassignments were resulting in happy, healthy children.

Money, a Harvard-educated native of New Zealand, had already established a reputation as one of the world’s leading sex researchers, known for his brilliance and his arrogance. He was credited with coining the term “gender identity” to describe a person’s innate sense of maleness or femaleness. The Reimers went to see Money, who with unwavering confidence told them that raising Bruce as a girl was the best course, and that they should never say a word to the child about ever having been a boy. About six weeks before his second birthday, Bruce became Brenda on an operating table at Johns Hopkins. After bringing the toddler home, the Reimers began dressing her like a girl and giving her dolls. She was, on the surface, an appealing little girl, with round cheeks, curly locks and large, brown eyes. But Brenda rebelled at her imposed identity from the start. She tried to rip off the first dress that her mother sewed for her. When she saw her father shaving, she wanted a razor, too. She favored toy guns and trucks over sewing machines and Barbies. When she fought with her brother, it was clear that she was the stronger of the two. “I recognized Brenda as my sister,” Brian was quoted as saying in the Colapinto book. “But she never, ever acted the part.” Money continued to perform annual checkups on Brenda, and despite the signs that Brenda was rejecting her feminized self, Money insisted that continuing on the path to womanhood was the proper course for her. In 1972, when Brenda was 7, Money touted his success with her gender conversion in a speech to the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C., and in the book, “Man & Woman, Boy & Girl,” released the same day. The scientists in attendance recognized the significance of the case as readily as Money had years earlier. Because Brenda had an identical male twin, they offered the perfect test of the theory that gender is learned, not inborn. Money already was the darling of radical feminists such as Kate Millett, who in her bestselling “Sexual Politics” two years earlier had cited Money’s writings from the 1950s as proof that “psychosexual personality is therefore postnatal and learned.”

Now his “success” was written up in Time magazine, which, in reporting on his speech, wrote that Money’s research provided “strong support for a major contention of women’s liberationists: that conventional patterns of masculine and feminine behavior can be altered.” In other words, nurture had trumped nature. The Reimer case quickly was written into textbooks on pediatrics, psychiatry and sexuality as evidence that anatomy was not destiny, that sexual identity was far more malleable than anyone had thought possible. Money’s claims provided powerful support for those seeking medical or social remedies for gender-based ills. What went unreported until decades later, however, was that Money’s experiment actually proved the opposite — the immutability of one’s inborn sense of gender. Money stopped commenting publicly on the case in 1980 and never acknowledged that the experiment was anything but a glowing success. Dr. Milton Diamond, a sexologist at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, had long been suspicious of Money’s claims. He was finally able to locate Reimer through a Canadian psychiatrist who had seen Reimer as a patient.

In an article published in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine in 1997, Diamond and the psychiatrist, Dr. H. Keith Sigmundson, showed how Brenda had steadily rejected her reassignment from male to female. In early adolescence, she refused to continue receiving the estrogen treatments that had helped her grow breasts. She stopped seeing Money. Finally, at 14, she refused to continue living as a girl. When she confronted her father, he broke down in tears and told her what had happened shortly after her birth. Instead of being angry, Brenda was relieved. “For the first time everything made sense,” the article by Diamond and Sigmundson quoted her as saying, “and I understood who and what I was.” She decided to reclaim the identity she was born with by taking male hormone shots and undergoing a double mastectomy and operations to build a penis with skin grafts. She changed her name to David, identifying with the Biblical David who fought Goliath. “It reminded me,” David told Colapinto, “of courage.”

David developed into a muscular, handsome young man. But the grueling surgeries spun him into periods of depression and twice caused him to attempt suicide. He spent months living alone in a cabin in the woods. At 22, he prayed to God for the first time in his life, begging for the chance to be a husband and father. When he was 25, he married a woman and adopted her three children. Diamond reported that while the phallic reconstruction was only partially successful, David could have sexual intercourse and experience orgasm. He worked in a slaughterhouse and said he was happily adjusted to life as a man. In interviews for Colapinto’s book, however, he acknowledged a deep well of wrenching anger that would never go away.  “You can never escape the past,” he told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer in 2000. “I had parts of my body cut away and thrown in a wastepaper basket. I’ve had my mind ripped away.” His life began to unravel with the suicide of his brother two years ago. Brian Reimer had been treated for schizophrenia and took his life by overdosing on drugs. David visited his brother’s grave every day. He lost his job, separated from his wife and was deeply in debt after a failed investment. He is survived by his wife, Jane; his parents, and his children.

Despite the hardships he experienced, he said he did not blame his parents for their decision to raise him as a girl. As he told Colapinto, “Mom and Dad wanted this to work so I’d be happy. That’s every parent’s dream for their child. But I couldn’t be happy for my parents. I had to be happy for me. You can’t be something that you’re not. You have to be you.”

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-may-13-me-reimer13-story.html

June 2n d 2021 Money talks and Bull shite walks. Woke Corporate Capture has been institutionalized. Large companies and corporation benefit, just follow the money. LGBTQ+ESG100 providing investors with a solid basis for backing corporations cooperating with LGBTQ+ Human Rights Campaign Activists

Wokeness that pays huge dividends. Advocates for ESGs (environmental, Social, Governance). A global social contract and its rapidly growing. In February 2021 in an annual letter BlackRock Larry Fink took note of the ‘tectonic shift’ towards ESG investing, reporting the ESG trend will continue to accelerate rapidly, he emphasized for corporations large businesses to focus on ‘post modernized rather than traditional idealisms as they hold more ESG value.

Encouraging them to respond to the social structures of change that are happening in the world today including that of LGBTQ1+. Reflect young peoples values, rather than traditional values.

The financial benefit for investor dollars focus on LGBTQ+ Rights. ESG – LGBTQ+ESG100 funds. By supporting and promoting LGBTQ+ Communities, ideas, policies, LGBTQ activism. Incorporate LGBTQ+ community survey data into methodology, generate benchmarks of the nations highest performing companies.  These Woke Corporation indexes screen out certain sectors for example guns, pornography and weapons of mass destruction and gambling for revenue.

Black Lives Matter LGBTQ Rights movement raise the bar of the ESG100 LGBTQ Index. Here there is a renewed focus on people of colour. (The Racial Divide-Colour of the Skins-Cultural Marxism)

Money talks Bull shite walks, as politics and corporation collaborate on LGBTQ+ electoral campaigning to gain votes from non-traditional post modern mayhem. The targeting of transgender youth. Those ESG100 – LGBTQ1 funding political votes

The leveraging of corporate capitalism, roots of all evil, global banks and global wokeness, wealthy billionaire investors  and financial institutions, debanking not only those that oppose LGBTQ1+ but also policies to eliminate viewpoints, freedom of expression.

Namely ‘A Viewpoint Diversity Business Score’. People, small businesses  that will be excluded from the market place or even excluded from secure employment.

Debanking = De-Growth= A Class system of Cultural Marxism = Global Communist Governance through Digital Data Governance through Financial Institutions.

China’s corporate governance model, the economical political syndicate of collaborative actors creating huge profits with State objectives. More State control of the economy, as the government turns to corporations because these governments no longer serve the people best interests, whilst the corporations serve their shareholder profiting best interests not the general publics.

This has become a massive Social, Cultural Marxist, Communist threat worldwide. That replaces a Free-market economy of freedoms and choices, supply and demand by pushing ESG governance. ‘Environmental, Social, Governance ( ESG) is a socialist ideology that falsely represents the global market place. A far leftist approach to business worldwide.  I simply ‘Woke’ Capitalism.

Cultural Marxism = Socialism. Communism is Socialism on steroids. Has a history of hardships, struggles, poverty, death etc.,  ESG is a ‘Woke’ Tool for a ‘Woke’ Communist takeover.

The aggressive Left ESG Corporate governance, a tool for global foundations like the Gates and Ford Foundations, the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum. The whisperers in the ear of all UN Agencies. (The WEF-UN Strategic partnership agreement signed 13^th June 2019. The term ‘ESG’ originally coined by the UN Environment Program Initiative 2005, was fully applied to the corporate world from 2015-UN Agenda 2030-

The WEF Global Redesign Initiative Summit where the gathering of governmental leaders, corporations etc., were asked by Klaus Schwab the founder of WEF “What do you want the world to look like min the future”. The strengthening of the global financial market by Corporate stakeholder capitalism.

Stakeholder Corporate Capitalism is just another term for Socialism/Communism.. DESG related control, dictating how business behave politically under a global communist regime. Global Communist Governance.

All the political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington know this, but are hiding it from the sovereign  peoples of New Zealand. Bail them up about this Communist Governance. I urge you not to let them silence you by calling this a ‘conspiracy theory’ . It is a global Conspiracy that cannot be ignored.  What we having been experiencing in NZ and across the world, the use of fear – Fear, fearfulness resulting in compliance. Now ESG Communist demanding compliance and control of populations lives through ESG compliance of the Global, National market place. They are gunning for small businesses, rural communities and small holder farmers. No farmers- No Food.

NOTE: CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO GO TO THE  LINK ON MY RUMBLE VIDEO

https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2021/lgbtq-esg100-etf/723521

https://rumble.com/v2hgm78-esgs-on-socialist-steroids-communism-lgbtq1-esg100.html

Relationship and Sexual Education in the NZ School curriculum (RSE)

Firstly Drag Queen story telling in Council Libraries are funded by you the public of New Zealand. Drag Queens are fetish adult entertainment not children’s entertainment. I cannot understand any parent or think that’s ok. Ratepayers I urge you to hold the CEO of the Auckland City Council to account. Drag Queen Library Story times are doing your child no harm.. He cannot. And if you are a parent taking your child to one of these adult drag queen library story times you need your head read.

 We need to know what’s going on in schools is not an accident this is part of a long cultural Marxism . This needs to be exposed. School boards across the world are trying to cover up what images are being shown to children. This evil monster must be exposed, this is a Marxist programme that been like a frog in a slowly boiling pot, its been going on for decades. This is a purposeful evil using the most vulnerable population we have, our children and young people.

Critical Race Theories, Critical theories are dangerous should not be taught in our schools. This is Cultural Marxism Oppressors Vs Oppressed. Where there is no middle ground. Black and white nothing in between. Just Dogma. The Ministry Of Education Sexuality and Relationship Programmes in NZ Schools. I question are we dealing with con artists, sexual aggressors anti-social predators, sexual groomers-exploiting our most vulnerable -our children. Childhood grooming is the deliberate act of establishing an emotional bond with a child to lower the child’s resistance. An emotional bond where teachers question the young about sexual pleasure, the most intimate details that you would never ask an adult out of due respect. Because they may feel uncomfortable, shamed or even victimized. Therefore our children are being sexually groomed in the classroom. Ask the Education Minister to prove to you that children are not being sexually groomed in the classroom. The Minister of Education cannot prove it. Childhood grooming is a deliberate act to lower a child’s, young persons resistance. That’s childhood sexual abuse.

Childhood Sexual Abuse includes sexual type activities. Which dismantle, destroy family relationships, destabilises childhood innocence. The pushing, crossing of boundaries of childhood innocence. Psychologically, emotionally, spiritually risking physical implications and criminality.

Common Grooming behaviours include: Perpetrators seek to form relationships with children, testing the boundaries of a child’s comfort levels, intimidation, sharing sexually explicit materials, and communicating secretly about sexuality. You as a parent on not a fly on the wall in the classroom, and your child has nowhere to run to whilst in the classroom whilst being coerced, indoctrinated and brainwashed sexually, politically

Classroom subjects such as English, Language, Art, Social Sciences, Maths, Tech etc., are all embedded with Sexuality and Relationship programming. Yes young people and children are being deliberately transitioned sexually, politically. A ‘bone fide grooming’ is taking place throughout NZ schools educational curriculum. It’s not unreasonable to question “are children, young people through the educational curriculum being deliberately primed for sexual abuse?

Catch the children whilst they are young, is this a deliberate societal transition that is intended to become generational. Does this set our children up to becoming abusers themselves, a dreadful thought, but we should think about that. The deliberate exploitation of children endangering them by exposing them to inappropriate content and language.

The eroding of parental rights. The Hilary Clinton ‘The child belongs to the global village’. The lack of visibility for parents to know what is actually going on in the school classroom should be a worry, COVID19 parents not allowed even in the school playground, to pick young children up from the classroom at the end of the day. The Global Village your child belongs to the State. The Cultural Marxist Global Elite. Goal-A Global Communist Governance.

 We should ask for absolute clear evidence children are not being harmed in anyway in the school classroom .That their health and wellbeing is not being endangered .Demand responsible and accountable responses from the Minister Of Education. Jan Tinetti is to be made accountable and responsible, she is the Education Minister.Chris Hipkins was the Minister Of Education when this RSE Cultural Marxism program was introduced into schools. Every decent person should want to protect children and young people from grooming, childhood abuse, sexualization and politicizations that’s happing out of parents sight in the school classroom. The distribution of harmful materials with sexual content, sexual pleasure should be prohibited completely in schools as resource materials and in school libraries. These materials are obscenities can be harmful to minors if they represent sexual conduct, sexual content. That can be offensive to minors, make them feel uncomfortable, emotionally upset, they may even be inclined to isolate themselves emotionally, this may cause psychological anxiety. This is not a time for teachers to delve into a child’s anxiety, discomforts, to do so would be revictimizing them.

Parents the people of New Zealand if you truly care for your children I urge you to stand up against this firewall of cultural Marxist tyranny. The use of their parties as predators within the Ministry Of Education Sexuality Relationship Programme should make you shudder. Under the mask of Bully Programmes in schools the Cultural Marxists introduced the sexualization, politicisation of our children, through Critical theory to destabilise society, to dismantle families.

UNESCO deliberately entrenched schools worldwide with the ‘Pleasure Project’. In sexuality and Relationship programme within the school curriculum, discussions, images as to what sexually pleasures our children our young. That is global sexual abuse. Adopted into schools worldwide, including in NZ Schools. This has been planned for well over a 100 years. The boiling frog was dipped into the cool water, now the water is about to boil. Our generation of children throughout the school system are being deliberately transformed to become the new normal, the victims of a new generational post modernized cultural oppressive  Marxism. The dismantling of the family structure, of Christian beliefs, morality, values of society itself. And they do not care they are children, they are young and vulnerable, that is just why they are targeting our children, our young.

Demand responsible and accountable responses from the Minister Of Education. Jan Tinetti is to be made accountable and responsible, she is the Education Minister.Chris Hipkins was the Minister Of Education when this RSE Cultural Marxism program was introduced into schools. Hipkins long term academic friend of Ardern-Cultural Marxist. The Minister of Education cannot prove it. Childhood grooming is a deliberate act to lower a child’s, young persons resistance. That’s childhood sexual abuse.

CLICK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE THIS WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO