NZD SOS NZ DOCTORS CONTINUE TO  SPEAK OUT WITH SCIENCE ( 26th March 2024) and the :- Collapsing Ivermectin Narrative: Frontline Doctors vs. US FDA. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a settlement with three frontline doctors whose foremost interest is successful patient outcomes. The three doctors who brought a case against the FDA for interfering in the doctor-patient relationship, and for overstepping its authority are celebrating a victory. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”.. The doctors at NZDSOS have also been pointing out ‘the government in the consultation room’ and advocating for doctors to be able to be doctors and have informed discussions with their patients, so they can make their own personal decisions.

In 2021, the FDA discouraged use of ivermectin to the extent of engaging in a propaganda campaign, most famously this tweet on 21 August 2021, linked to this consumer update expressing concern about “a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. As well as their social media campaign, the FDA sent a letter to the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Pharmacy in December 2021 to claim that use of ivermectin in prevention or treatment of Covid “may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19.“.

This apparent attempt to regulate its use directly contradicts the legal right of physicians to use any FDA-approved (Medsafe-approved in NZ) drug for “off-label prescribing”, meaning to treat conditions which the drug was not officially approved for. Because many drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, off-label prescribing is used in around one third of all treatment prescriptions. It seems the reason for the suppression of the use of ivermectin was to pave the way for the vaccines.  An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the injections was not possible in the US if an effective treatment was available.

In New Zealand, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, issued a similar warning to its members on 3 Sept 2021.“Off-label use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 is strongly not recommended.” Medsafe issued an Alert on 6 Sept 2021 which included the comment: “Ivermectin is NOT APPROVED to prevent or treat COVID-19, which means that Medsafe has not assessed the safety and efficacy for this use. Inappropriate use of ivermectin can be dangerous.”

The Pharmacy Council NZ issued a notice in Oct 2021 with advice to pharmacists referencing the Medsafe statement and the RNZCGP.  This encouraged pharmacists to report (dob in) doctors who were prescribing this safe medication. “Current evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.  Ivermectin, particularly when used at high doses, has the potential to cause adverse effects including: severe nausea, vomiting, and neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

“If a pharmacist has concerns regarding the competence or conduct of a prescriber, they may make a notification to the registrar of the relevant responsible authority.” Represented by legal counsel with a history of litigating against federal and regulatory agencies for wrongdoing, the three frontline physicians – Dr Robert Apter, Dr Mary Talley Bowden and Dr Paul Marik filed a lawsuit against the FDA. The legal argument revolved around the FDA practicing medicine by recommending against ivermectin for COVID-19 when they had not collected evidence to determine whether ivermectin was safe and effective for this purpose.

The doctors also alleged that the FDA was exceeding its authority by attempting to set medical standards which impacted the rights of clinicians to prescribe off-label. The role of the FDA is to assess safety and efficacy of medicines and approve them if appropriate.  It is not the FDA’s role to regulate their use once approved. (summary by Dr Pierre Kory),. When the lawsuit was initially filed, the FDA successfully moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that it cannot be sued because it has “sovereign immunity.”  Legal counsel for the doctors immediately appealed using the argument of ultra vires, which describes an official acting outside their authority. The Appeals Court judge ruled that the case could proceed and the FDA finally settled out of court with the plaintiffs (doctors).  The FDA now must remove all posted or published advice recommending against the use of ivermectin for Covid-19.

Dr Kory is of the opinion that the FDA closed on settlement rather than pursuing the legal case, because the entire PR campaign against ivermectin was devised and executed by a PR firm working for Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC, and that legal discovery would have caused reputational damage to individuals involved.

Dr Marik said at the FLCCC press briefing after settlement, that “We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’An interesting perspective on the story is that weaponized narratives such as the propaganda against ivermectin, leading to public harm whilst benefiting those in positions of power, establish “narrative scaffolds”. Once false information has solidified a narrative scaffold into place, the truth may be revealed but public opinion is already formed around the scaffold and may never be revised.

Meanwhile NZDSOS and, we trust, our supporters, will continue to work at showing New Zealanders that the ivermectin story is a part of the bigger picture of public-private partnerships between captured regulators such as Medsafe, and the pharmaceutical industry who fund a staggering proportion of the budget of regulators. Dr Scott Jensen from Minnesota, USA responded to the FDA settlement ruling in this video.  Thanks to Coronavirus Plushie for the below excellent montage illustrating the establishment of a weaponized narrative scaffold. We look forward to the day that fraudulent narrators, including Dr Ian Town, Dr Ashley Bloomfield and Sarah Fitt, are held accountable for the harm their actions have caused to New Zealanders




CRIMES AGAINGST HUMANITY Blog Posts View all Categories


The evil radical Islamic attack on Moscow and the massive persecution of Christians throughout the world….

THIS SHOULD BRING IT HOME TO EVERYONE’ 2023 report Vatican News’ Over 360 million Christians suffered persecution in the world in one year 2023.  1 in 7 Christians suffer high levels of persecution. 2022- 2023 was the worst year for Christians worldwide, because of the intensify violence, discrimination, exclusion. There is a drastic increase of kidnapping, abductions of Christians. 30,000 incidents have been recorded. Churches have been targeted. Thousands of Christian women raped, forced marriages, forced conversion. This is only the top of the iceberg. There are 50 countries in an updated report that face the most extreme persecution for their Christian faith.

The World Watch List is Open Doors’ annual ranking of the top 50 countries where Christians face the most persecution and/or discrimination for their faith.  Since 1993, the annual report has revealed the scale and severity of the persecution of Christians, with the number of countries where Christians suffer high and extreme levels of persecution having almost doubled to more than countries since the report’s inception.

Last year 4,998 Christian were killed for their faith worldwide (World Watch 2024). By Islamic militants, armed bandits, some countries allowing, enabling this Islamic militancy to flourish. Christians deemed either friends or foe. Foreign influence repress religious freedom, Two-thirds of all attacks and closures of churches and public Christians properties were in China, where tightening religious laws and intrusive surveillance have forced many churches to splinter into a myriad of small, less visible groups. Even many of those regulated by the state have been closed and amalgamated with larger churches

Yesterday a concert hall in Moscow was attacked, this was a bloody attack by the Islamic State. Its reported there were four gunmen and dozens of Christians are dead. The Islamic State published a photo of the 4 attackers, it is reported that they planned and conducted this evil assault on the Moscow Concert Hall and that 130 lives have been lost. Brutally murdered.

Its reported the men were wearing baseball caps and face scarfs pointing to the sky with one finger, a gesture that has become associated with the Islamic State terrorists. In the background an Islamic State poster. The extremist Islamic murderous Islamic terrorists carried out an intensive monitoring operation before the attack, according to the statement. The four evil Islamic terrorist  bastards were armed with machine guns, knives, bombs they sought to inflict as much damage as they possible could on a large crowd of Christians. The extremist Islamic state wounded people in total. The Islamic State terrorist stating they are ‘waging war between the Islamic State and countries fighting Islam”

A senior counter terrorism official has confirmed as such to the New York times that this is the Islamic State known as IS-K (New York Times reported) This being an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. IS-K is an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. Earlier this month the US Embassy in Moscow issued a warning of potential terror attacks by extremist advising US citizens to avoid large gatherings, including concerts. Earlier this month, the top US general in the Middle East said IS-K could attack US and Western interests outside of Afghanistan “in as little as six months and with little to no warning.”

But by Saturday US Officials privately admitted the terrorist alert had been partially based on recent intelligence indicating the IS-K branch of the terror group was active inside Russia

LETS REVISIST NEW ZEALAND HISTORY. A KNIFE ATTACK ON SHOOPERS AT A NEW LYNN MALL BY A CHARACTER OF ISLAMIX EXTREMISM BEING MONITORED  BY POLICE OUTSIDE THE MALL AS HE WAS INSIDE THE SUPERMARKET IN THE MALL. SHOPPERS WERE BADLY INJURED, TRAUMATIZED. This quickly died a natural death by the Mainstream media propaganda machine. Then before that the police officer down south who had his police car rammed, a hatchet carrying, knife wielding Islamic terrorist hacking at the police cars bonnet as this maniac shouts out Ala akaba, the police officer managed to radio for help, climb out a passenger door window, as he was chased by this Islamic hatchet wielding evil bastard. It was reported the police officer feared he would be decapitated.

Going back further in  NZ history: And now thinking about how law abiding citizens have been harassed, targeted by police, surveillance, report in the CH Ch Royal Inquiry stating that Police and SIS had listed 1700 NZrs on a suspect  watch list. The Inquiry concluded their was no evidence for them to have these 1700 Kiwi names listed.  Since the Australian Citizens attack on CH CH Mosques we have been targeted as being ‘white supremacists, extreme right, islamophobics and the list goes on, the character assassination of law abiding Kiwi citizens has been huge.

Lets go back to the Beehive 6th November  2014 John Key speaks in the House. He announces the response to threats against NZ’s National Security by International Terrorism. He said this is serious and he takes his responsibilities seriously for those NZrs at home and abroad. He announced a review of NZs Security settings around foreign fighter, outlined urgent changes that was needed to address the evolving threat environment. The rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) posing a threat not just internationally but regionally and locally. Saying that ISIL is thought to have 3000 foreign fighters in its ranks holding western passports from a range of countries

John Key stated “We’re extremely concerned about New Zealanders being attracted to this brutal regime – as in other Western countries, ISIL has been successful in recruiting New Zealanders to its cause,”. “Government agencies have a watch list of between 30 and 40 people of concern in the foreign fighter context. These are people in, or from New Zealand who are in various ways participating in extremist behavior.”

Some of the watch list group have travelled to Syria to engage in fighting and remain there. Others are ISIL supporters who have tried to travel but been prevented by the cancellation of their passports.            The remaining people on the watch list are involved in funding terrorism, radicalizing others or are becoming radicalized themselves. Another 30 to 40 individuals require further investigation in addition to the watch list group. Responding to the evolving terrorist fighter issue the Cabinet approved limited focused legislative changes . And a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZ SIS to increase staff numbers

In addition to this the Government has committed a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZSIS to increase the number of staff able to work on investigations. Along with these changes the NZ Govt continued to consider NZs potential contribution the international coalition against ISIL. Key concluded he will take a careful considered approach to the rising threat of ISIL which is presented locally, regionally, internationally

17 Community questions to those whom survived the CH CH mosque attacks and their families. “Whom were you scared off before 15th March 2019, the time of the terrorist attack by an Australian Citizen REPLY ‘Daesh’ ISIS. Prior to Ramadan. Tarrant made several visits to Turkey and also a 42 day stay there, at the time that Tourist agencies were reporting that westerners should stay away from Turkey because of kidnappings, killings of westerners, it was dangerous. Strange that Tarrant felt safe enough to stay in Turkey. FOOD DFOR THOUGHT and Prayers for those murdered seriously harmed in that blood bath in a Moscow Concert Hall full of Christians by evil bastard Extremist Islamic Terrorists   So Ardern for your CH CH Call globally. So Luxon your embracing support for Arderns CH Call.



The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.  Bill Gates hosts new global pandemic war-room simulation—’Catastrophic Contagion’ … pandemic tabletop exercise in Brussels, Belgium. “Catastrophic Contagion” – The WHO, Johns Hopkins, and Bill Gates take part in simulated exercises

SEERS is coming. The highlights reel from Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium on October 23, 2022. Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS) by John Landry, BS, RRT | Updated: Jun 12, 2023

Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS) is a fictional respiratory disease, which, for the purposes of this article, is caused by a newly identified enterovirus strain. As a thought experiment, we will explore the potential impact and challenges that such a disease could pose on global public health.Drawing from the knowledge of existing enteroviruses and respiratory illnesses, we will discuss the hypothetical epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies that might be associated with SEERS.

Enteroviruses are a group of RNA viruses that include polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and others. They can cause a variety of illnesses, such as hand, foot, and mouth disease, meningitis, and encephalitis. Some enteroviruses can also cause respiratory infections, but these are typically not as severe as other respiratory illnesses, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).

Both SARS and MERS are caused by coronaviruses and can lead to severe respiratory infections, causing symptoms such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath. SARS emerged in 2002–2003, while MERS was first reported in 2012. Both have been associated with high mortality rates and global public health concerns.

Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would play a key role in coordinating efforts, providing guidance on best practices, and supporting research initiatives. Furthermore, countries would need to invest in their public health infrastructure and surveillance systems to detect and respond to emerging infectious diseases promptly. What is the meaning of the name Seer? 1. a person who sees; observer. 2. a person who prophesies future events; prophet. Industry seers predicted higher profits. The term ”seer” comes from the word ”see,” meaning to perceive something, usually with the eyes. It is a translation of the Greek word for this person, the ”mantis” (Greek: μᾰ́ντῐς). ”Mantis” is translated to ”seer” but some scholars believe the word to be related to the mind and perception as well.






THE WORLD HEALTH ORG., (UN) REPORTED 15TH MAY 2023  the orchestrated framework of policy makers, for Education and Health authorities and specialist the ‘Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe’ this is to apply to all UN Nations, International communities. To over-ride the teaching practices of ‘sovereign nations; in Europe and the wider International communities to Sexuality Education’. We already have this Sexuality and Relationship in every subject in NZ School curriculum but now it seems that the World Health Organization wants to extend on this. As they document a message for parents that ‘sexuality’ education starts at birth. Many European Nations have already complied to the UNs seeking to expand an already ugly evil sexual deviancy in school classrooms worldwide. The UN have now produced the International a ‘ Guide to Sexuality Education’ which was produced by UN Education 2030.

Yes, 2020- 2030 The UN Decade of Action, to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.. including a new born baby at birth. And the WHO are actively promoting this globally. Mid April 2023 the Commission on Population Development (UN( failed to reach a consensus on this strategy however they were given a reprieve for now. It was the Un (UNESCO) that introduced the Sexuality and Relationship School Curriculum into New Zealand and other countries worldwide, and this has been adopted widely throughout the world.  Where children talk in class about sexual desires, encouraged to watch pornography, and told they can be any sex, gender they want to be. Shh Shh we wont tell mum and dad. WHO Vision is ‘Sexuality from Birth”, the development of advocacy and training  educational teachers to teach children about ‘child fiddling, this is psychopathic control of children’s health and wellbeing, its criminal, its cruel and its evil.

 If an adult was do this to a child prison would be the only place for them, incarcerated for a very long time. But here we have the State has perpetrating sexual childhood abusers. (This is my personal take on this). It makes me feel sick to the core. WHO documentation states clearly its intentions are to empower children, for children to be respectful of healthy relationships with family members, peers, friends romantic or sexual. The framework teaching “children assume consent consists of meaning ‘they can consent to sex’. That a baby holding a parents hands is about the baby having sexual feelings, sexual pleasure.  What sick evil bastards.

That ‘Sexuality education starts at birth, is firmly based on gender, equality and the acceptance of diversity. I personally believe these are Global Childhood Sexual predator and the NZ Government the puppets of these evil sexual  predators and if childhood educators that comply and agree to this sexual deviancy in the school curriculum they too are guilty by association.  WakeUpNZ. Carol Sakey




Please find below  my opposition to the LEGALLY BINDING  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I have found that the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) “Zero Draft” the new agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, called WHO CA+, is significantly flawed.  Due to the evidence and information provided below I oppose the WHO CA+ Treaty.

(1)WHO failed miserably in preventing the spread of COVID-19, the WHO CA+ draft would dramatically expand WHO authority to declare a pandemic and, thereby, trigger provisions in the treaty that would re-allocate resources and encourage governments to waive intellectual property rights

(2)New Zealand is already playing an active part in planning the WHO CA+ without consultation of the public of New Zealand’s input. The Government have been deliberately non-transparent as to the WHO CA+ and its purposes, aims, goals as to its intention as to the WHO Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(3)The proposed Treaty is due to be introduced at the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024.  If New Zealand agrees and are compliant to the WHO CA+ this will risk  further increased significant tax payer payments  as to the allocation  to the added expenditure it will cost our country

(4)The World Health Organization has already miserably failed since the pandemic first evolved on many accounts, yet it appears that members of the New Zealand Government are supporting and even promoting the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(5)The draft of the WHO CA+ clearly focuses on significantly strengthening, expanding the powers of the World Health Organization which I note signed a ‘Partnership Memorandum with the World Economic Forum on 13th June 2019.

(6)The WHO/ WEF is now  a Public-Private Partnership. The UN was never originally declared as such when it was created.  Obviously through the extraordinary super powers awarded to the WHO would also reward the Multi-stakeholder Corporations that WEF represents., therefore there is a massive conflict of interest that would effectively bring multistakeholder corporations, and those represented by the WEF huge wealth and power in the realms of  global politics and economies. The WEF is the whisperer in the ears of the WHO.

(7)The ZERO draft of the International Pandemic Treaty focuses on hugely expanding the authority, powers of World Health Organization, which give WHO the super powers to trample on ‘intellectual property rights’ and the redistribution of knowledge and technology. The WHO will become the only one, so called source of ‘Truth’, therefore having the ability to shut down the ‘True’ source of Truth., this is very dangerous.

 (8)WHO International Health Regulations 2005 failed miserably when it came to accessing China’s part in the origins of the COVID19 pandemic instead of holding them to account and responsible for their failings under the IHR2005 the WHO now parrots the CCP and even praises the Chinese regime. Therefore cannot be trusted to be such a superior force of authority over all UN Nation States.

 (9)In accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of International Laws the people of New Zealand have the right to self-determine and manage their own autonomous approach to public health. This is a ‘sovereign’ right, the people of New Zealand are the ‘sovereignty who have that right. The global superior authoritative right does not lay with the WHO to control, cause damage to society, business, infrastructure or medical, technical determinations of the people of New Zealand. The people rights in New Zealand are that of ‘self determination’

(10)The people of New Zealand have in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the Principles of International Law the sovereign right to determine, manage their own approach to public health, this notably also means ‘pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems pursuant to the autonomy of domestic policies, legislations. That is provided that within this domestic jurisdiction the control awarded to the state through the vote of the people in New Zealand ‘causes no harm, damage to the peoples of New Zealand’.

(11)Sadly I say there has been much damage done to the peoples of New Zealand through the governments misinformation as to the COVID19 immunizations and the mandating of these. The closures of businesses throughout New Zealand and the loss of work and income.  Also the closure of schools where many children have not returned back to school.

(12)The members of  New Zealand House of Representatives have shown themselves to be  non-transparency upon publicly  exposing the serious harms and deaths of post COVID 19 immunizations. The many law abiding decent people of New Zealand have been deliberately abused by members of the New Zealand mainstream news media that has been paid for by the Governments Journalist Fund.

 (13) A member of Parliament namely Michael Wood character assassinating, labelling people those who are grieved through loss of work and income, loss of businesses as a so called ‘River of Filth’. Amongst those people he called a ‘River of Filth’ and ‘Anti -Vaxers’ were those that had been vaxed and were suffering serious harms post immunization.  As noted, not one member of Parliament has apologised for this cruel emotional harm caused to people of New Zealand by members of the House of Representatives. 

(14)The mandating of COVID19 Immunization. The following  term has often been quoted by members of WHO and WEF,  and even members of NZ House of Representatives ‘No-one is safe until everyone is Safe’. Pfizer Chief Executive has publicly admitted that they did not test their COVID19 immunization for transmission prior to entering the global market place.  Evidence has shown us that those that have been injected with the Pfizer mRNA  Injection have still been infected by the virus.. . Obviously the people of New Zealand have been misled when it has come to mandating of COVID19 immunizations and mandates

(15)It is a huge concern that large Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer have and continue to advise the Intergovernmental working group on the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty as to the Zero Draft which is a huge conflict of interest.

(16)It is a deep concern that if the New Zealand Government continues to pursue, support the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) it would give the WHO superior authority over NZ Domestic policies. WHO would have the power to declare a pandemic globally whether New Zealand is affected or not and could have the power to reallocate resources.

(17)The Zero Draft of the WHO CA + Pandemic Treaty makes transparency and cooperation mandatory (legally Binding). Uses the word ‘shall’ when referencing facilitating accessing, sharing of research and genomic data, however there are no repercussions for ‘non-compliance’. It is evidently clear that the WHO and those drafting this treaty , and those that support, promote it have learned nothing. There is no reason to believe that China would be compliant with the obligations set out in the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)  I also note that the  World Health Organizations failure to quietly abandon investigations into China’s incompetence to comply to the legally binding WHO Health Regulations (IHR 2005)

(18)The WHO CA+ Draft lets China off the hook. Despite China having the largest economy in the world the United Nations considers China as a developing country. Developed countries financially support developing countries when it comes to ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ among nations. Developed countries would share the greater costs therefore  China will likely be the beneficiary of the WHO CA+ obligation for developed nation parties, among other provisions.

(19)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty Zero Draft calls on the parties to tackle misleading, misinformation or disinformation. Yet the WHO  themselves have been the source of disinformation when they tweeted  “preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of COVID 19.

I refer to the ‘World Health Organization ‘Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no evidence of human to human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-n CoV) identified in Wuhan Vina. Twitter January 14th 2020 18​/1217043229427761152 

(20)As for the CDC on the efficacy of facial mask wearing that shifted over time, when Anthony Fauci defended flip flop accusations after shifting mask guidance, this has reported changed time and time again. There is much controversy about mask wearing. It is clearly evident that many people wear masks as chin straps. Masks do risk emotional, psychological damage to some extent. Mask wearing is not normalised behaviour so will affect people in different ways.  LINK: Independent, July 29, 2021,

(21)A recent study found that natural immunity acquired by a COVID-19 infection was “associated with lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the variant, than mRNA primary-series vaccination. Yet WHO superior authorities under a legally binding Pandemic Treaty could mandate all populations to be vaccinated, immunized without accountability. This is very dangerous.

LINK:” Hiam Chemaitelly et al., “Protection from Previous Natural Infection Compared with mRNA Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19 in Qatar: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” The Lancet, November 11, 202,​22)00287-7/fulltext (accessed February 24, 2023).

(22)The WHO and UN Member Nation Governments and their  so called experts have been proven wrong far too often, yet the WHO Pandemic Treaty gives WHO the global super power authority to police “disinformation. This seriously infringes on the internationally accepted right to freedom of expression. (UN International  Human Rights and NZ Domestic Human Rights Legislations)

(23)The WHO CA+ Treaty Draft emphasizes ‘Equity’. It is guided by ‘Equity’, which is defined by the absence of unfair, unavoidable or remediable differences among and within countries, including between different groups of people, whether these groups are defined socially, economically, demographically, geographically or references ‘Inequality’. The term ‘Equity’ and ‘Equitable’ appear more that thirty times in the ZERO Draft of the Treaty, however there is no clear definition what this means.

(24)The people of New Zealand have the right to have clear, concise information. (ibid., Art 3,4 (3) ). It is evidential by the ZERO Draft of the WHO CA+ Treaty that it is guided by ‘Equity’, a term that is deeply rooted in ‘Marxist’ ideology and should never be embedded in the guiding principles of any international legally binding commitment of any State, including that of New Zealand.

(25)The ZERO Draft of the CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord- Convention) commits to the term ‘Universal Health Coverage’, this is not clearly defined. I stand to be corrected, but does that mean that the Government provides the peoples of New Zealand health care, is that with or without costs to the peoples of New Zealand, and at what costs must the people of New Zealand pay?. How will this indeed affect tax payers pockets?

(26)Its obvious that if the NZ House of Representatives agree, comply to the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty domestic legislations will have to be amended.  The people of New Zealand are not awarded end decision making rights when it comes to domestic policy making.    I refer to the (Non-Legally Binding Citizens Initiated Referenda), and even if this did become ‘Legally Binding’ the people of New Zealand would have no end decision rights when it comes to Domestic Policies due to the legally binding nature of the WHO CA+ Treaty.. Therefore upon voting for political parties at election time, this means that promises made to the voting public can be over- ridden by the WHO Pandemic Treaty

(27)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty (Accord) incorporates a ‘One Health’ approach framework. This includes ‘Humans, Animals-wild and domestic and all Eco-systems’. This means that the WHO under the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty has massive super superior control over every aspect of life on this planet.

(28)WHO CA+ Treaty under the classification  of ‘Climate Change’ will have the authority to restrict, control food systems, trade and travel, infrastructure, land use and property rights. This is scandalous and extremely dangerous when it comes to the health and wellbeing of New Zealanders.

(29)Those that reside in the NZ House of Representatives are accountable to the people of New Zealand who voted them in to the political positions they hold in the New Zealand House of Representatives. To be responsible and accountable to ALL peoples of New Zealand.  Through researched evidence of viewing speeches in the House and other UN Information that New Zealand Members of Parliament are supporting, promoting and are in agreeance with the WHO ZERO Draft of the CA +.

(30) I also note that at the 77th gathering of the World Health Assembly the final draft of the CA+ WHO International Pandemic Treaty will be produced, introduced to all UN Member Nation States to determine whether, and which UN Member States agree on the WHO International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(31) I therefore request that the NZ House of Representatives transparently accords the peoples of New Zealand open public debate, discussion without political intrusion as to all knowledge, information that is pertained in every ZERO draft of the WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty as it is produced, introduced.

The draft states that the WHO CA+ “shall be subject to ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by UN Member Nation States, therefore clearly requires advice and consent under the process outlined., “Circular 175 Procedure,” (accessed February 24, 2023).

(32)I conclude that the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) is highly problematic and deeply flawed and would allow the global superior powers of the World Health Organization (UN) to have authority over New Zealand’s domestic policies. One size does not fit ALL and there is no evidence of ‘trustworthiness’ as to why the people of New Zealand should support this WHO Treaty proposal.

(33)The ‘Public-Private’ partnership of the World Economic Forum with the UN is a huge conflict of interest as they are  the ‘whisperers in the ear’ of the UN, therefore also  rewarded global superiority political, economical control through the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) agreeance.

Therefore, for all the above reasons , information provided I totally oppose the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord). I find it to be highly dangerous to the health and wellbeing of ALL peoples of New Zealand. I have cc’d other groups, individuals, organizations, members of parliament the above information-communication t as outlined to the NZ House of Representatives as to opposition of the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I request a response at your earliest. Thank you.


Carol Sakey