THE OVER-REACH IN THE DOCTOR- PATIENT RELATIONSHIP ‘ A CASE AGAINST THE US FDA’ (IVERMECTIN)

NZD SOS NZ DOCTORS CONTINUE TO  SPEAK OUT WITH SCIENCE ( 26th March 2024) and the :- Collapsing Ivermectin Narrative: Frontline Doctors vs. US FDA. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a settlement with three frontline doctors whose foremost interest is successful patient outcomes. The three doctors who brought a case against the FDA for interfering in the doctor-patient relationship, and for overstepping its authority are celebrating a victory. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”.. The doctors at NZDSOS have also been pointing out ‘the government in the consultation room’ and advocating for doctors to be able to be doctors and have informed discussions with their patients, so they can make their own personal decisions.

In 2021, the FDA discouraged use of ivermectin to the extent of engaging in a propaganda campaign, most famously this tweet on 21 August 2021, linked to this consumer update expressing concern about “a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. As well as their social media campaign, the FDA sent a letter to the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Pharmacy in December 2021 to claim that use of ivermectin in prevention or treatment of Covid “may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19.“.

This apparent attempt to regulate its use directly contradicts the legal right of physicians to use any FDA-approved (Medsafe-approved in NZ) drug for “off-label prescribing”, meaning to treat conditions which the drug was not officially approved for. Because many drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, off-label prescribing is used in around one third of all treatment prescriptions. It seems the reason for the suppression of the use of ivermectin was to pave the way for the vaccines.  An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the injections was not possible in the US if an effective treatment was available.

In New Zealand, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, issued a similar warning to its members on 3 Sept 2021.“Off-label use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 is strongly not recommended.” Medsafe issued an Alert on 6 Sept 2021 which included the comment: “Ivermectin is NOT APPROVED to prevent or treat COVID-19, which means that Medsafe has not assessed the safety and efficacy for this use. Inappropriate use of ivermectin can be dangerous.”

The Pharmacy Council NZ issued a notice in Oct 2021 with advice to pharmacists referencing the Medsafe statement and the RNZCGP.  This encouraged pharmacists to report (dob in) doctors who were prescribing this safe medication. “Current evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.  Ivermectin, particularly when used at high doses, has the potential to cause adverse effects including: severe nausea, vomiting, and neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

“If a pharmacist has concerns regarding the competence or conduct of a prescriber, they may make a notification to the registrar of the relevant responsible authority.” Represented by legal counsel with a history of litigating against federal and regulatory agencies for wrongdoing, the three frontline physicians – Dr Robert Apter, Dr Mary Talley Bowden and Dr Paul Marik filed a lawsuit against the FDA. The legal argument revolved around the FDA practicing medicine by recommending against ivermectin for COVID-19 when they had not collected evidence to determine whether ivermectin was safe and effective for this purpose.

The doctors also alleged that the FDA was exceeding its authority by attempting to set medical standards which impacted the rights of clinicians to prescribe off-label. The role of the FDA is to assess safety and efficacy of medicines and approve them if appropriate.  It is not the FDA’s role to regulate their use once approved. (summary by Dr Pierre Kory),. When the lawsuit was initially filed, the FDA successfully moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that it cannot be sued because it has “sovereign immunity.”  Legal counsel for the doctors immediately appealed using the argument of ultra vires, which describes an official acting outside their authority. The Appeals Court judge ruled that the case could proceed and the FDA finally settled out of court with the plaintiffs (doctors).  The FDA now must remove all posted or published advice recommending against the use of ivermectin for Covid-19.

Dr Kory is of the opinion that the FDA closed on settlement rather than pursuing the legal case, because the entire PR campaign against ivermectin was devised and executed by a PR firm working for Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC, and that legal discovery would have caused reputational damage to individuals involved.

Dr Marik said at the FLCCC press briefing after settlement, that “We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’An interesting perspective on the story is that weaponized narratives such as the propaganda against ivermectin, leading to public harm whilst benefiting those in positions of power, establish “narrative scaffolds”. Once false information has solidified a narrative scaffold into place, the truth may be revealed but public opinion is already formed around the scaffold and may never be revised.

Meanwhile NZDSOS and, we trust, our supporters, will continue to work at showing New Zealanders that the ivermectin story is a part of the bigger picture of public-private partnerships between captured regulators such as Medsafe, and the pharmaceutical industry who fund a staggering proportion of the budget of regulators. Dr Scott Jensen from Minnesota, USA responded to the FDA settlement ruling in this video.  Thanks to Coronavirus Plushie for the below excellent montage illustrating the establishment of a weaponized narrative scaffold. We look forward to the day that fraudulent narrators, including Dr Ian Town, Dr Ashley Bloomfield and Sarah Fitt, are held accountable for the harm their actions have caused to New Zealanders

LINK (https://nzdsos.com/2024/03/26/the-collapsing-ivermectin-narrative-frontline-doctors-vs-us-fda/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly-posts)

 

...

CRIMES AGAINGST HUMANITY Blog Posts View all Categories

THE OVER-REACH IN THE DOCTOR- PATIENT RELATIONSHIP ‘ A CASE AGAINST THE US FDA’ (IVERMECTIN)

NZD SOS NZ DOCTORS CONTINUE TO  SPEAK OUT WITH SCIENCE ( 26th March 2024) and the :- Collapsing Ivermectin Narrative: Frontline Doctors vs. US FDA. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a settlement with three frontline doctors whose foremost interest is successful patient outcomes. The three doctors who brought a case against the FDA for interfering in the doctor-patient relationship, and for overstepping its authority are celebrating a victory. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”.. The doctors at NZDSOS have also been pointing out ‘the government in the consultation room’ and advocating for doctors to be able to be doctors and have informed discussions with their patients, so they can make their own personal decisions.

In 2021, the FDA discouraged use of ivermectin to the extent of engaging in a propaganda campaign, most famously this tweet on 21 August 2021, linked to this consumer update expressing concern about “a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. As well as their social media campaign, the FDA sent a letter to the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Pharmacy in December 2021 to claim that use of ivermectin in prevention or treatment of Covid “may pose risks to patient health or lead to delays in getting effective treatment of COVID-19.“.

This apparent attempt to regulate its use directly contradicts the legal right of physicians to use any FDA-approved (Medsafe-approved in NZ) drug for “off-label prescribing”, meaning to treat conditions which the drug was not officially approved for. Because many drugs have multiple mechanisms of action, off-label prescribing is used in around one third of all treatment prescriptions. It seems the reason for the suppression of the use of ivermectin was to pave the way for the vaccines.  An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the injections was not possible in the US if an effective treatment was available.

In New Zealand, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, issued a similar warning to its members on 3 Sept 2021.“Off-label use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 is strongly not recommended.” Medsafe issued an Alert on 6 Sept 2021 which included the comment: “Ivermectin is NOT APPROVED to prevent or treat COVID-19, which means that Medsafe has not assessed the safety and efficacy for this use. Inappropriate use of ivermectin can be dangerous.”

The Pharmacy Council NZ issued a notice in Oct 2021 with advice to pharmacists referencing the Medsafe statement and the RNZCGP.  This encouraged pharmacists to report (dob in) doctors who were prescribing this safe medication. “Current evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.  Ivermectin, particularly when used at high doses, has the potential to cause adverse effects including: severe nausea, vomiting, and neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

“If a pharmacist has concerns regarding the competence or conduct of a prescriber, they may make a notification to the registrar of the relevant responsible authority.” Represented by legal counsel with a history of litigating against federal and regulatory agencies for wrongdoing, the three frontline physicians – Dr Robert Apter, Dr Mary Talley Bowden and Dr Paul Marik filed a lawsuit against the FDA. The legal argument revolved around the FDA practicing medicine by recommending against ivermectin for COVID-19 when they had not collected evidence to determine whether ivermectin was safe and effective for this purpose.

The doctors also alleged that the FDA was exceeding its authority by attempting to set medical standards which impacted the rights of clinicians to prescribe off-label. The role of the FDA is to assess safety and efficacy of medicines and approve them if appropriate.  It is not the FDA’s role to regulate their use once approved. (summary by Dr Pierre Kory),. When the lawsuit was initially filed, the FDA successfully moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that it cannot be sued because it has “sovereign immunity.”  Legal counsel for the doctors immediately appealed using the argument of ultra vires, which describes an official acting outside their authority. The Appeals Court judge ruled that the case could proceed and the FDA finally settled out of court with the plaintiffs (doctors).  The FDA now must remove all posted or published advice recommending against the use of ivermectin for Covid-19.

Dr Kory is of the opinion that the FDA closed on settlement rather than pursuing the legal case, because the entire PR campaign against ivermectin was devised and executed by a PR firm working for Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC, and that legal discovery would have caused reputational damage to individuals involved.

Dr Marik said at the FLCCC press briefing after settlement, that “We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’An interesting perspective on the story is that weaponized narratives such as the propaganda against ivermectin, leading to public harm whilst benefiting those in positions of power, establish “narrative scaffolds”. Once false information has solidified a narrative scaffold into place, the truth may be revealed but public opinion is already formed around the scaffold and may never be revised.

Meanwhile NZDSOS and, we trust, our supporters, will continue to work at showing New Zealanders that the ivermectin story is a part of the bigger picture of public-private partnerships between captured regulators such as Medsafe, and the pharmaceutical industry who fund a staggering proportion of the budget of regulators. Dr Scott Jensen from Minnesota, USA responded to the FDA settlement ruling in this video.  Thanks to Coronavirus Plushie for the below excellent montage illustrating the establishment of a weaponized narrative scaffold. We look forward to the day that fraudulent narrators, including Dr Ian Town, Dr Ashley Bloomfield and Sarah Fitt, are held accountable for the harm their actions have caused to New Zealanders

LINK (https://nzdsos.com/2024/03/26/the-collapsing-ivermectin-narrative-frontline-doctors-vs-us-fda/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly-posts)

 

...

THE EVIL BASTARD ISLAMIC EXTREMIST ATTACK ON CHRISTIANS IN MOSCOW YESTERDAY

The evil radical Islamic attack on Moscow and the massive persecution of Christians throughout the world….

THIS SHOULD BRING IT HOME TO EVERYONE’ 2023 report Vatican News’ Over 360 million Christians suffered persecution in the world in one year 2023.  1 in 7 Christians suffer high levels of persecution. 2022- 2023 was the worst year for Christians worldwide, because of the intensify violence, discrimination, exclusion. There is a drastic increase of kidnapping, abductions of Christians. 30,000 incidents have been recorded. Churches have been targeted. Thousands of Christian women raped, forced marriages, forced conversion. This is only the top of the iceberg. There are 50 countries in an updated report that face the most extreme persecution for their Christian faith.

The World Watch List is Open Doors’ annual ranking of the top 50 countries where Christians face the most persecution and/or discrimination for their faith.  Since 1993, the annual report has revealed the scale and severity of the persecution of Christians, with the number of countries where Christians suffer high and extreme levels of persecution having almost doubled to more than countries since the report’s inception.

Last year 4,998 Christian were killed for their faith worldwide (World Watch 2024). By Islamic militants, armed bandits, some countries allowing, enabling this Islamic militancy to flourish. Christians deemed either friends or foe. Foreign influence repress religious freedom, Two-thirds of all attacks and closures of churches and public Christians properties were in China, where tightening religious laws and intrusive surveillance have forced many churches to splinter into a myriad of small, less visible groups. Even many of those regulated by the state have been closed and amalgamated with larger churches

Yesterday a concert hall in Moscow was attacked, this was a bloody attack by the Islamic State. Its reported there were four gunmen and dozens of Christians are dead. The Islamic State published a photo of the 4 attackers, it is reported that they planned and conducted this evil assault on the Moscow Concert Hall and that 130 lives have been lost. Brutally murdered.

Its reported the men were wearing baseball caps and face scarfs pointing to the sky with one finger, a gesture that has become associated with the Islamic State terrorists. In the background an Islamic State poster. The extremist Islamic murderous Islamic terrorists carried out an intensive monitoring operation before the attack, according to the statement. The four evil Islamic terrorist  bastards were armed with machine guns, knives, bombs they sought to inflict as much damage as they possible could on a large crowd of Christians. The extremist Islamic state wounded people in total. The Islamic State terrorist stating they are ‘waging war between the Islamic State and countries fighting Islam”

A senior counter terrorism official has confirmed as such to the New York times that this is the Islamic State known as IS-K (New York Times reported) This being an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. IS-K is an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. Earlier this month the US Embassy in Moscow issued a warning of potential terror attacks by extremist advising US citizens to avoid large gatherings, including concerts. Earlier this month, the top US general in the Middle East said IS-K could attack US and Western interests outside of Afghanistan “in as little as six months and with little to no warning.”

But by Saturday US Officials privately admitted the terrorist alert had been partially based on recent intelligence indicating the IS-K branch of the terror group was active inside Russia

LETS REVISIST NEW ZEALAND HISTORY. A KNIFE ATTACK ON SHOOPERS AT A NEW LYNN MALL BY A CHARACTER OF ISLAMIX EXTREMISM BEING MONITORED  BY POLICE OUTSIDE THE MALL AS HE WAS INSIDE THE SUPERMARKET IN THE MALL. SHOPPERS WERE BADLY INJURED, TRAUMATIZED. This quickly died a natural death by the Mainstream media propaganda machine. Then before that the police officer down south who had his police car rammed, a hatchet carrying, knife wielding Islamic terrorist hacking at the police cars bonnet as this maniac shouts out Ala akaba, the police officer managed to radio for help, climb out a passenger door window, as he was chased by this Islamic hatchet wielding evil bastard. It was reported the police officer feared he would be decapitated.

Going back further in  NZ history: And now thinking about how law abiding citizens have been harassed, targeted by police, surveillance, report in the CH Ch Royal Inquiry stating that Police and SIS had listed 1700 NZrs on a suspect  watch list. The Inquiry concluded their was no evidence for them to have these 1700 Kiwi names listed.  Since the Australian Citizens attack on CH CH Mosques we have been targeted as being ‘white supremacists, extreme right, islamophobics and the list goes on, the character assassination of law abiding Kiwi citizens has been huge.

Lets go back to the Beehive 6th November  2014 John Key speaks in the House. He announces the response to threats against NZ’s National Security by International Terrorism. He said this is serious and he takes his responsibilities seriously for those NZrs at home and abroad. He announced a review of NZs Security settings around foreign fighter, outlined urgent changes that was needed to address the evolving threat environment. The rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) posing a threat not just internationally but regionally and locally. Saying that ISIL is thought to have 3000 foreign fighters in its ranks holding western passports from a range of countries

John Key stated “We’re extremely concerned about New Zealanders being attracted to this brutal regime – as in other Western countries, ISIL has been successful in recruiting New Zealanders to its cause,”. “Government agencies have a watch list of between 30 and 40 people of concern in the foreign fighter context. These are people in, or from New Zealand who are in various ways participating in extremist behavior.”

Some of the watch list group have travelled to Syria to engage in fighting and remain there. Others are ISIL supporters who have tried to travel but been prevented by the cancellation of their passports.            The remaining people on the watch list are involved in funding terrorism, radicalizing others or are becoming radicalized themselves. Another 30 to 40 individuals require further investigation in addition to the watch list group. Responding to the evolving terrorist fighter issue the Cabinet approved limited focused legislative changes . And a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZ SIS to increase staff numbers

In addition to this the Government has committed a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZSIS to increase the number of staff able to work on investigations. Along with these changes the NZ Govt continued to consider NZs potential contribution the international coalition against ISIL. Key concluded he will take a careful considered approach to the rising threat of ISIL which is presented locally, regionally, internationally

17 Community questions to those whom survived the CH CH mosque attacks and their families. “Whom were you scared off before 15th March 2019, the time of the terrorist attack by an Australian Citizen REPLY ‘Daesh’ ISIS. Prior to Ramadan. Tarrant made several visits to Turkey and also a 42 day stay there, at the time that Tourist agencies were reporting that westerners should stay away from Turkey because of kidnappings, killings of westerners, it was dangerous. Strange that Tarrant felt safe enough to stay in Turkey. FOOD DFOR THOUGHT and Prayers for those murdered seriously harmed in that blood bath in a Moscow Concert Hall full of Christians by evil bastard Extremist Islamic Terrorists   So Ardern for your CH CH Call globally. So Luxon your embracing support for Arderns CH Call.

https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/part-8-assessing-the-counter-terrorism-effort/introduction/

...

WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THIS JUST A TABLE TOP EXERCISE OR IS THIS REALLY GOING TO HAPPEN???

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.  Bill Gates hosts new global pandemic war-room simulation—’Catastrophic Contagion’ … pandemic tabletop exercise in Brussels, Belgium. “Catastrophic Contagion” – The WHO, Johns Hopkins, and Bill Gates take part in simulated exercises

SEERS is coming. The highlights reel from Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium on October 23, 2022. Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS) by John Landry, BS, RRT | Updated: Jun 12, 2023

Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS) is a fictional respiratory disease, which, for the purposes of this article, is caused by a newly identified enterovirus strain. As a thought experiment, we will explore the potential impact and challenges that such a disease could pose on global public health.Drawing from the knowledge of existing enteroviruses and respiratory illnesses, we will discuss the hypothetical epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies that might be associated with SEERS. https://www.respiratorytherapyzone.com/severe-epidemic-enterovirus-respiratory-syndrome/

Enteroviruses are a group of RNA viruses that include polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and others. They can cause a variety of illnesses, such as hand, foot, and mouth disease, meningitis, and encephalitis. Some enteroviruses can also cause respiratory infections, but these are typically not as severe as other respiratory illnesses, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).

Both SARS and MERS are caused by coronaviruses and can lead to severe respiratory infections, causing symptoms such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath. SARS emerged in 2002–2003, while MERS was first reported in 2012. Both have been associated with high mortality rates and global public health concerns.

Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would play a key role in coordinating efforts, providing guidance on best practices, and supporting research initiatives. Furthermore, countries would need to invest in their public health infrastructure and surveillance systems to detect and respond to emerging infectious diseases promptly. What is the meaning of the name Seer? 1. a person who sees; observer. 2. a person who prophesies future events; prophet. Industry seers predicted higher profits. The term ”seer” comes from the word ”see,” meaning to perceive something, usually with the eyes. It is a translation of the Greek word for this person, the ”mantis” (Greek: μᾰ́ντῐς). ”Mantis” is translated to ”seer” but some scholars believe the word to be related to the mind and perception as well.

LINK: https://www.respiratorytherapyzone.com/severe-epidemic-enterovirus-respiratory-syndrome/

 

 

...

THE GLOBAL ‘SEXUAL PREDATORS’ OF BABIES FROM BIRTH

THE WORLD HEALTH ORG., (UN) REPORTED 15TH MAY 2023  the orchestrated framework of policy makers, for Education and Health authorities and specialist the ‘Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe’ this is to apply to all UN Nations, International communities. To over-ride the teaching practices of ‘sovereign nations; in Europe and the wider International communities to Sexuality Education’. We already have this Sexuality and Relationship in every subject in NZ School curriculum but now it seems that the World Health Organization wants to extend on this. As they document a message for parents that ‘sexuality’ education starts at birth. Many European Nations have already complied to the UNs seeking to expand an already ugly evil sexual deviancy in school classrooms worldwide. The UN have now produced the International a ‘ Guide to Sexuality Education’ which was produced by UN Education 2030.

Yes, 2020- 2030 The UN Decade of Action, to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.. including a new born baby at birth. And the WHO are actively promoting this globally. Mid April 2023 the Commission on Population Development (UN( failed to reach a consensus on this strategy however they were given a reprieve for now. It was the Un (UNESCO) that introduced the Sexuality and Relationship School Curriculum into New Zealand and other countries worldwide, and this has been adopted widely throughout the world.  Where children talk in class about sexual desires, encouraged to watch pornography, and told they can be any sex, gender they want to be. Shh Shh we wont tell mum and dad. WHO Vision is ‘Sexuality from Birth”, the development of advocacy and training  educational teachers to teach children about ‘child fiddling, this is psychopathic control of children’s health and wellbeing, its criminal, its cruel and its evil.

 If an adult was do this to a child prison would be the only place for them, incarcerated for a very long time. But here we have the State has perpetrating sexual childhood abusers. (This is my personal take on this). It makes me feel sick to the core. WHO documentation states clearly its intentions are to empower children, for children to be respectful of healthy relationships with family members, peers, friends romantic or sexual. The framework teaching “children assume consent consists of meaning ‘they can consent to sex’. That a baby holding a parents hands is about the baby having sexual feelings, sexual pleasure.  What sick evil bastards.

That ‘Sexuality education starts at birth, is firmly based on gender, equality and the acceptance of diversity. I personally believe these are Global Childhood Sexual predator and the NZ Government the puppets of these evil sexual  predators and if childhood educators that comply and agree to this sexual deviancy in the school curriculum they too are guilty by association.  WakeUpNZ. Carol Sakey https://mercatornet.com/the-world-health-organization-has-a-message-for-parents-sexuality-education-starts-at-birth/84241/

 

...