THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR TE PATI MAORI’S AGGRESSION

Since Anthropology emerged as a scientific discipline in the 19th Century the coined phrase Indigenous and Tribal Peoples have been a major focus. According to the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues there is reported to be 370 Million so called Indigenous people in 90 countries globally (Reported By the UN). Approx 70% live in Asia. There is reported to be 5,000 ethnic Cultures of Indigenous People

The Rights & Interests of so called Indigenous Peoples are recognized through various International Declarations Eg; 1989 Internation Labor Org., Convention (No 169) * 1992 UN Convention on Biological Diversity * 2007 UN Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) The UNDRIP covers Civil, * Political * Economic *Social * Cultural *Environmental Rights & Interests under International Law (Also Human Rights Laws)

The UNDRIP imposes Obligations , Commitments on UN Member States, Organizations & Inter-governmental bodies. Included is the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs http://www.iwgia.org/culture-and-identity/ identification-of-indigenous-people)  Also a growing body of Human Rights Entities

The Diversity of Indigenous peoples was adopted by the UN System, where a modern understanding of this was utilized worldwide. The modern understanding of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples met the following criteria by the UN as ‘Self-Identification ‘ *Historical continuity with Pre-colonial History and / or Pre-Settler Societies * Accepted by their Tribal Community  *Ancestral environment.  Indigenous Peoples were historically referred to as Tribal or Native Peoples

There is Official Universal definition of the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples in International Law. (UN). Although various UN Agencies and International NGOs- Corporations etc., with self interests also Central/Local Govts of UN Nations States have utilized the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples as to Regulations- Policies- Political and Monetary self -interests.

In the 1970’s the coined phrase was used as a way of linking experiences, issues, struggles of groups- ( De-Colonization). The first meeting of the UN Working Group of Indigenous Populations (WGP) took place 9/8/1982. Is now celebrated as the International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People. Again – No definition of Indigenous People was adopted by the UN Agency. The Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous issues stated.

In the “concept of Indigenous Peoples the prevailing view today, is that there is No Formal Universal Definition on the term ‘Indigenous Peoples – given that a single definition will inevitably be with or with (over or under) inclusiveness- thus making sense in some societies but not in others”. However a number of UN Agencies have used the term Indigenous Peoples on Statements, coverages for certain International Agreements (But these are definitions used for particular reports)

Another example is that the Inter-American Commission On Human Rights doesn’t provide a definition of Indigenous Peoples, but have stated that ‘Self-identification’ as being a fundamental criteria’.  Manvir Singh an  Anthropologist states there’s a lack of coherence, inconsistencies  in which ethnic groups are called Indigenous or not. People argue the term. Have pressure put on them to self identify themselves as Indigenous People’. Thus erasing Identification. This varies from one country to another. Adding – There is no accepted Universal Definition of  the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples

The UN ILO International Labour Org., twice adopted definitions of Indigenous Peoples at their Conventions in 1957 & 1989. Only a few countries acknowledged it therefore could not be used in International Law. Only by the countries that adopted the definition. The World Bank  definition of Indigenous People is not Binding by International law as it is determined within Banks Operational Policies * Policy Guidelines. Documents and Agreements of ‘Good Faith’

UN Agenda 21 (1992) recognized the potential contribution in using the coined phrase Indigenous Peoples referring to Sustainable Development. The 2024 UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 16) UN Nation States agreed to a new permanent body for Indigenous Peoples. Which allows them to advise COP members on Biodiversity (An Indigenous worldview) on Sustainability.

From the UN 1993 World Conference on Human Rights- the  (UN Vienna Declaration ) was adopted- recognizing the culture of Indigenous Peoples. Described as a ‘Strong Commitment to – Economic *Social*Cultural Wellbeing. (The enjoyment of the Fruits of Sustainable Development)  9th August 1994 UN proclaimed as International Day of the Worlds Indigenous People (Their Rights & Interests) 1995 UN launched the Decade of the Worlds Indigenous Peoples. (UN Resolution 49/214) Furthering-Advancing the Global Agenda

The UN in 2021 referenced the UN Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples. To be documented into International laws Namely ‘Under the Umbrella of Social Justice. Dystopia ‘ Some Animals have more rights than others.

Te Pati Maori’s strong connection to the UNDRIP (Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indifenous Peoples). First adopted on  13th September 2007  at the New York UN Assembly. It had taken 20 + years to draft. There was much debate and discussion during this time on the UNDRIP by the working group at the UN

. Te Pati Maori actively engage in the Principles of the UNDRIP (Seld Governance). With Te Tiriti o Waitangi committed to the UNDRIP. Several Kerero Constitutional Conventions held at Auckland University. Preplanning the embedding of the UNDRIP into NZs Constitutional Arrangements. The UNDRIP being a crucial tool for Iwi/Maori Self-Governance

Although NZ Rejected the UNDRIP in 2007 – John Key and Pita Sharples Deputy leader of the Maori Party made a deal. Under a veil of secrecy Pita Sharples attended the UN and adopted the UNDRIP for NZ. When John Key was asked by the secrecy his response was “I did not want to spoil Pita Sharples Thunder’. New Zealand’s have no say when it comes to the State adopting International Laws. NZ is a party to some 1900 International Agreements.

Although the UNDRIP is Non-Binding there is also a commitment, obligation to pursue it, implement it. Its not legally Legislative. Sit outside Hard Law  as a Soft Law, can be used– called upon- referenced by the Judicial. Unless it is embedded in NZ Domestic Laws its Non Binding. (But there are  serious implications when it comes to implementing the UNDRIP in NZ.

It all lies in the 2007 UNDRIP adoption in the New York UN Assembly where Rosemary Banks Representative of NZ shared with the assembly why NZ would not adopt it. Its extremely important to know why because this is the real reason for the Hikoi. For David Seymour being attacked. Spoiling Te Pati Maori and their activist collaborators thunder for their self interested preplanning for their future self  interests. (The reasons for the insame aggressive behavior in Parliament)

Lets get to the root of the course.. Firstly the UNDRIP adoption into legislation is crucial for the Self Governance of Iwi/Maori. UNDRIP is a crucial tool- a weapon of aggression… NZ * US * Canada * Australia did not ratify the Declaration at this time…Rosemary Banks was NZs Representative at the UN New York Assembly at the time.

She explained to the gathering why NZ would not sign the UNDRIP. (1) It gives Indigenous Peoples Control- ownership of Entire Lands of NZ (2) Did not take into account that people already legally-lawfully owned land (Had Property Rights)  (3)Redress- Compensation for Entire Lands of NZ (Ownership- Control of All NZs Natural Resources (4) Veto Rights Over Legislation  (5) Two Classes of Citizenship).

Winston Peters states NZ First will dump the UNDRIP (That’s not happened yet). David Seymour is skirting around the edges not talking about the UNDRIP. But targeting how Farmers are having to seek Cultural Rights on their lands by  Iwi Tribal Groups. And that Council.

Such as Auckland Council has an Iwi Advisory Independent Group where people , businesses, farmers have to seek their advice on Resource Management Consents. (Co-Governance – Veto Rights are already (still) being implemented. ACT PARTY now have a Petition online to Dump Te Mana Te Wai it appears regulations, rules are being made by those whom have Iwi/Maori ancestry

Race Based Politics. Critical Race Theory is rife in New Zealand right throughout the system. Education.. Politics.. Society..Environment.. Health. This is not a Healthy situation for NZ. If we remain quiet  about this then we enable it. We must speak up. Ignore being character assassinated as Racist. Don’t self censor and don’t be censored. This is Separatism- not unity- this is Apartheid

WakeUpNZ

Researcher: Cassie

...

Other Blog Posts

MALTHUSIANISM ‘ THE ELEPHANT’S ARE STILL IN THE ROOM’

The definition of Malthusianism Theory is that the human population grows more rapidly than the food supply until famines, war, disease reduces the population. More than two centuries ago (1798) Thomas Robert Malthus introduced this theory on ‘population growth’ He authored a book ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population’ where population growth if unchecked outstrips the food supply, leading to an imbalance between food and population growth

A ‘Malthusian Fear’ is otherwise known as a  “Malthusian catastrophe” this includes ‘premature deaths like disease, hunger, war, epidemics, famines and other natural calamities. Checks and balances reinstate the balance between population and food supply. My mind wanders to the ‘left’, because I innately believe Ardern is capable of doing anything.  In my minds I appears the words ‘Population Control’, excuse the pun but these words stick out like a pair of dog’s balls, because it sure has been a crazy insane world over the last couple of years.

Back in 1798 Malthus’s time, there was no advanced AI digital technology, not like now where probably 98% of New Zealanders would have no idea how these scientists, researchers in academia come up with their predicted, projected results that are called ‘evidence based’.

Evidence based is a system where a small favoured group of individual scientists, researchers are involved in a ‘I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine’, which is simply just a trade off, a win- win situation, here is an example of what I am getting at:- The Prime Ministers Office and Cabinet favours a couple of university scientists, they by AI digital data modelling produce the information (evidence)  the government needs to produce Bills, amend Acts and make Regulations. This has been highlighted more so since COVID19 hit New Zealand shores, this ginormous storybook is being played out across the world to reward self interested parties.

Note how when the pandemic’s first year time and time again there was this revisiting the history of the 1918 war, then Shaun Hendy publicised that there would be masses of deaths daily in New Zealand and the hospitals would be overwhelmed. One news article reported that undertakers in another country was running our of coffins, when I researched this found it to be a blatant lie, the coffin makers had actually gone on their long Christmas break and there was no shortage of coffins at all.

We await the food shortage we hear about. Marsden is closed which means it puts us in a more vulnerable place, however Marsden Point Oil Refinery also provided a by-product used as a reserve in meats, cheats and other foods hence now there is more talk about food shortages. On top of this Ardern plunders our country into further debt and disruption, I am sure her head is full of Zero Carbon because she certainly is obsessed with it as Nanaia Mahuta is with the ‘Three Waters Reform Plan’ hence ‘water on the brain’

Back to ‘Malthusianism’, Marxist Paul Ehrlich’s authored an educational textbook the ‘Population Bomb’ (1844)  The book ‘The Population Bomb’ stated that in the 1970’s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death that nothing can be done to prevent the world’s death rate from rising. The solution would be ‘the world’s population must be bought under control, the growth rate must be reduced to zero’. To achieve growth rate zero, or negative it was suggested a sterilant could be used temporarily, put into water and food supplies, that monetary incentives be given to men who agreed to be sterilised before having two children and those that produce more children were taxed more. Sex selection was suggested and a much bigger plan would be to establish a Dept of Population and Environment to determine population size this would include research into population control. ‘Malthusianism’

Another Marxist named Engels  wrote ‘The productive power of mankind’s disposal is immeasurable’ namely Malthusianism. The Marxist view is that overpopulation is ‘non-sustainable’. In the 1970’s and 1980’s it was predicted ‘due to over-population and major societal upheavals immediate action was advocated to limit population growth.  Taking another step back in history, in the 1950’s and 1960’s there were fears of  population explosion this became embedded in the minds of a worldwide audience, not surprising as Ehrlich’s book ‘Population Explosion’ sold 2 million copies worldwide.

Malthusianism bought environmentalism to be a front-runner for environmental issues worldwide. Population and environment collaborated ‘human number became debated and assessed as to our human future’. Large Malthusian organizations were established name The Club of Rome, The Club De Madrid, Club of Budapest and the Sierra Club, they focused on global issues such as  environmentalism and population. Of course the United Nations have their Population and Environment which includes research and policies relating to population advice for all UN member countries. ‘Malthusianism’.

Neo‐​Malthusian policies aimed at limiting family size have increased female infanticide and sex‐​selective abortion in China and India, skewing the world’s sex ratio at birth to 107 boys per 100 girls. (The natural ratio is 105 boys per 100 girls.). In 2016 nine million abortions that took place in China. A  2019 report had similar findings: “Chinese authorities threatened or imposed punishments on families for illegal pregnancies and births, using methods including heavy fines, job termination, and abortion

Malthusianism is relevant for economic development today (Article 2010). Population and growth have two key components, a positive standard of living on the growth rate of population resulting either from a biological effect of consumption on birth and death rates, or a behavioural response on the part of potential parents to their economic circumstances eg; a negative feedback from the size of population to the standard of living.

The association of lower fertility with higher human capital investment via a quality–quantitative mechanism, and the effect of lower fertility in freeing up the labour for labour output production, in this instance the term ‘Malthusian’ is used. Hence the size of the population such as congestion of fixed resources.

In poorer countries like India and Africa parts of Asia ‘Malthusian’ effects are more likely to exist because poorer countries having the largest populations. Overpopulation in India has been a major concern for amost 5 decades. A UN report stated that India’s population will rise to 1.5 billion by 2050. Therefore in an effort to limit the growth of the population India is using mass sterilisation for population control. Sterilization also being used as a contraception.

The United Nations has been massively involved in population control. A conference held in August 1984 referencing the 1974 Bucharest Conference expanded the World’s Population Plan of Action in order to incorporate the results of their latest research, data provided by UN Member Nations Government.

REFERENCE TO: UN World Population Policies 2021 ‘Policies related to fertility’ has been produced by the ‘Population Division of the UN Dept of Economic and Social Affairs’. This UN agency provides policies in economic, social and environmental spheres  a global interface for UN Nation Member Countries.. The division is an interagency coordination mechanism to monitor trends and to address current and emerging population issues. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2021).- World Population Policies 2021 are related to fertility

My research refers to the UN 2021 World Population Police on Fertility. Globally through 2019 three quarters of governments worldwide had policies related to fertility. Among the 102 countries with available data in 2019, 88 governments considered the fertility of adolescents to be a matter of concern. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic and social changes have affected fertility levels in many countries,  Population experts and national and international leaders began calling for action to stem rapid population growth (May, 2012). Two academic conferences on population, organized or co-organized by the United Nations, were held in Rome in 1954 and Belgrade in 1965.  The World Population Conference, held in Bucharest in 1974, was the first of three intergovernmental conferences on population convened by the United Nations. It attracted a broader audience than the earlier academic conferences, including government officials from 135 countries, and led to the adoption of the World Population Plan of Action. Some population policies, especially in past decades, included specific quantitative targets and were not entirely voluntary, sometimes using strong incentives or coercion to ensure widespread adoption of family planning practices and leading in the most extreme cases to the use of forced sterilization or abortion as means of population control.

In 1962, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to “conduct an inquiry among the governments of States Members of the United Nations and members of the specialized agencies concerning the particular problems confronting them as a result of the reciprocal action of economic development and population changes”.4 To implement this mandate, the Population Division, currently part of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, conducted the first United Nations Inquiry among Governments on Population and Development in 1963 and, since then, has periodically gathered information on official government’s views and policies concerning a wide range of population issues, including fertility and family planning.

During 2015-2020, four out of eight world regions had below-replacement fertility, namely Europe and Northern America, Australia and New Zealand, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. New Zealand’s fertility rates. New Zealand’s population has decreased significantly during the last 10years. Fertility rate for women in 2011 was 2.078 . The fertility rate for women in 2022 in 2022 is recently 1.61.per woman. Please Note: Replacement population is 2.1. One must ask how the government is going to increase population numbers in New Zealand to meet the ‘population replacement’ rate?.

As for New Zealand’s Replacement pPopulation, I believe Ardern will accelerate ‘globalisation’, saturate the country with migrants, refugees from Afghanistan, Syria etc., hence diluting New Zealand’s sovereignty fast tracking ‘global citizenship’ in New Zealand.

UN Agenda 2030 17 global development goals includes extensive migration. During the UN Assembly the NZ representative at the UN recently informed the UN Assembly that the UN Global Compact of Migration would be entered into NZ Policy. Non-Binding UNGCM would hence become binding-lawful).

UN Agenda 2030 a non-binding agreement has already been made binding and lawful by Ardern. This is entrenched with multistakeholder capitalism. To destroy Free-market economy, small businesses and farming in New Zealand. Those that control the water and  land  also control the food hence ultimately control the  people.

‘MALTHUSIANISM’  Whenever food supply increases, population rapidly grows to eliminate the abundance resulting in perpetual human suffering unless we control human population.

 

NOTE: Click on the image above it will link you to my Rumble Video  which references Helen Clark, John Key, Jenny Shipley as the ‘Elephants that are still in  the room’ – ‘Malthusianism’

...

THE MASSIVE GLOBAL PANDEMIC THAT IS NOT BEING REPORTED

There is a massive  ‘Global Pandemic’ that is being ignored. The mainstream media globally, nationally are deliberately ignoring it. Between October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021:  360 Million Christians were persecuted worldwide.  (source of info – Gladstone Institute International Policy Council). This is absolutely horrific.

You won’t hear this being reported in mainstream media news nor from any other media unless its an independent media source. Over the past 5 years Christian persecution worldwide has increased 70% and there is no sign of letting up.

In 2021 an average of 16 Christians were murdered every day, because of their faith every day (Source- World Watch List-2022 ), World Watch is an humanitarian International Organization.. I repeat this again because its hard to take in that so many Christians are being persecuted and continue to be persecuted from 1st October 2020- September 30th 2021 Over 360 million Christians suffered high levels of persecution and discrimination.

A rise of 20 million from the previous year. This equates to 1 in 7 Christians worldwide suffer persecution for their faith. The latest report record the high Christian persecutions since the International World Watch published their list-report 29 years ago.

5,898  Christians were murdered for their faith.. 24% more than the year before when 4,761 Christians were murdered.  Additionally 6,175 Christian believers were detained without trial, arrested, imprisoned and 3,829 Christians were abducted. 5,110 Churches and other Christian buildings (schools, monasteries etc.,) were attached and profaned. REPEAT-EVERY DAY AROUND THE WORLD 16 CHRISTIANS ARE MURDERED.

Afghanistan is the most dangerous place in the world to be for any Christian. – Christian men face almost certain death if his Christian faith is found out by the Taliban. Women and girls in Afghanistan may escape death and may be married to  Taliban fighters. Often women and girls are raped and used for human trafficking.

.The incoming Taliban regime had access to recordings and reports that helped them ID where and who the Christians are. These Christians were often detained, before they were murdered they were made to tell the identity of other Christians and where they could be found. The Taliban is said to go door to door tracking down Christians. The incoming Taliban regime gained access to recordings and reports that helped to identify Christians.

North Korea is no. 2 on the list then Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Nigeria, Pakistan, Iran, India and Saudi Arabia are all on the top 10 of the worst persecutors of Christians. Christians face being  beaten. Raped, imprisoned, slaughters for merely attending a church. – Nine of the Eleven worst places to be for Christians have Muslim majorities.

Extreme persecution” meted out to Christians in nine of the top 11 worst nations for persecuting Christians  takes place in Muslim-majority nations- and are governed by Sharia Law (Islamic Law)39 out of the 50 countries on the World Watch report are overwhelmingly governed by Islamic Law (Sharia Law), that’s directly enforced by the government or by society or both.

The Taliban show no fear of reprisal from the West as the West has expanded their own Agenda’s, have weak or corrupt governments, or exploiting their own people..

In Sub Saharan Africa violence against Christians is extremely high due to the increased rise of jihadist violence. There are great fears that a significant part of the region faces destabilization.  The Boko Haram in Nigeria and Cameroon continue to murderously wreak havoc.

These Islamic State Groups are active in West Africa and Mozambique.    Al Shabab control large parts of Somalia and Islamic Extremism is seriously advancing as Westernized Governments choose not to look in that direction.

When ISIS took over parts of the Middle East, Christians were executed, abducted, sexually assaulted and hunted.  Groups like Boko Haram and Al Shahab severely threaten Christians.  When Taliban took control of Afghanistan being Christian is about having a death plastered all other them.

Muslims that convert to Christianity find themselves severely persecuted by their families and the communities they live in, so they have to move away from their homes.”  The persecution of Christians in India has intensified Hindu extremists aim to cleanse the country of the presence of  Christians and have minority religions.

Under the veil of COVID19 pandemic Christians have been deliberately, intentionally overlooked when it comes to the distribution of government aid and have been blamed for having spread the virus to others.

The COVID19 Pandemic has been used to shut down churches in China and to keep them permanently shut. In China Christians have been imprisoned and tortured to death, bibles were destroyed, churches and homes looted. Christians suffered humiliation.

Forbes. Com reported in 2021 that Christians are subject to various methods of discrimination and persecution in China. A Christian Chinese website that had existed in China for 20 years this year ceased to exist.

In Qatar violence against Christians rose sharply, many churches  were forced to stay closed because they were targeted using  COVID restrictions.”  Local authorities in Bangladesh told Muslims who covert to Christianity to return to Islam or receive no government aid.  Under the Veil Of COVID19  in the Central African Republic, Christians were also denied Government Aid , however they were told if tghey revert back to Islam they will be able to eat.

84 million Christians are fleeing religious persecution. These Christians end up as refugees in neighbouring Muslim Nations. They cannot escape from the fear they are trying to run away from. Christian women fleeing their homes reported how they have been sexually assaulted, there are many reports of women and children having been raped, used in sexual slavery. Many drawn into prostitution to survive.

As jihadism spreads a much larger Christian exodus is expected.  Hate Crime against Christianity is very evident in Western Europe it is at its all time high.  According to a November 16th 2021 report by the organization for ‘Security and Cooperation in Europe’ over a  quarter of all hate crimes registered in Europe in 2020 were ‘Anti- Christian’ compared to 2019.

Jews were the next who were most targeted against when it came to Hate Crime. (A very close 2nd on the list to Christians) However there are significantly fewer Jews worldwide than Christians. Approx.,  15 million Jews as opposed to approx.., 2.8 billion Christians. NOTE: The media do not report on those that are ‘Christian Haters’.

360 million Christians around globally are being persecuted the world are experiencing “high levels of persecution and discrimination… The number of Christians highly persecuted, discriminated against in 2018 was 215 million.  In 3yrs has increased by 45 million Christians persecuted for their faith. This is horrific yet Ardern’s political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington busy themselves with Hate Crime Laws

Using Tarrant as a scape goat. Tarrant an Australian citizen not a Kiwi. We have this Islamophobia and White Supremacy, Right Wing Extremism thrown at good law abiding Kiwi’s, those with Christian Values & Belief’s.

3.Why were the police and SIS looking the other way in March 2019?  Was it because there had so many Islamic Extremist’s on their NZ Designated watch list in New Zealand. On NZ Police Website lists associated with Resolution 1373- namely terrorist designated in New Zealand

A list formed at the Prime Ministers discretion. The dates from which these terrorists have resided in NZ, and how many have had been dates renewed as being still designated in NZ since February 2010 until now.

Al-Shabaab from Somalia and the Liberation Army, Harakat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, Bangladesh (HUJI-B), Indian Mujahideen (IM), Military Wing of Lebanese Hizballah, the Islamic Resistance, ISIL, Jundallah and Maute Group-also known as Islamic State in Lanao; Islamic State of Lanao;,  Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), Tarrant’s on the list,-Brenton-Harrison Tarrant, the Shining Path

An deliberate extremist Islamic attack against shoppers in a supermarket in New Lynn Auckland with a  number of serious injuries. Police are outside the shop, not in view of the terrorist whom they were watching so closely.

The Govt knew  the terrorist was a serious threat, what happened Police shoot him dead. But what does Ardern say. BBC reported that Ardern said “Supermarket stabbing was a ‘terrorist attack’. Six people had been wounded, the Sri Lankan was under police surveillance

Ardern publicly  in a news conference said, “this was despicable, hateful, was wrong, it was carried out by an individual, not a faith” But what a whopping lie, a witness heard the attacker shouts “Allahu Akbar (God is Greatest). This is a phrase uttered by Muslims many times a day in prayers and in in greetings. New Counter-Terrorism Laws, Hate Speech Laws will also target Christian minded Conservative law abiding citizens. Persecutions & Discrimination against Christians

Christian believes, values- One man that courageously stands up, has been to  prison, is discriminated against and character assassinated, targeted by Ardern’s purchased Media is Brian Tamaki.  Then there is Pastor Carl Bromley from Christchurch his house ransacked and damaged by police whilst they watched him leave the house they then moved in to do their ransacking. Carl Bromley was reported by Newshub as saying ‘The Govt are seeking to rape me of my right to worship as a church gathering targeted

Police confronted him over his hosting of an alert level 4 church service over the weekend. Police warned Carl Bromley he could face arrest or a fine but Carl said “I will not bow down to legislation that deprives me of my God given right to worship”. Carl Bromley told Police “Just because its legal, does not mean it is right, just because its illegal does not mean its wrong “

For every Nigerian Christian Minister who prays at the alter in his church, who gathers together fellow Christians to prayer he and those that worship with him know the dire risks they take, that the church doors could at any time be thrown open, or kicked by ruthless Islamic extremists. They know full well, they will be brutally murdered for practising their Christian faith-they are  ‘Christian Martyr’s.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58405213

https://www.police.govt.nz/advice/personal-community/counterterrorism/designated-entities/lists-associated-with-resolution-1373

 

 

 

...

GLOBALIZED SOCIALISM: THE DEVIL INCARNATE ‘THE PLUNDERING OF NEW ZEALAND.

The Godless ‘Black Book of Communism’ the evil ideology hatched by Karl Marx with his ‘Communist Manifesto’. Before he authored this he was writing about hell. In 1827 he wrote this poem:- “Thus heaven I’ve forfeited, I know it full well. My soul once true to God has chosen hell”. Marxism consigned to death more than 100 million souls in the 20th Century only. Marxism and it’s Godless roots of Socialism. Marx was fascinated with the devil.

Engel’s  yet another famous Marxist, together with Karl Marx they developed a body of ideas critiques of political economical and philosophical theory namely ‘Scientific Socialism’ one which favours Communism, Socialism and a Multi-stakeholder economy over a ‘Free-market Enterprise economy. known as ‘Marxism’  Marxian Socialism .  Hence favouring Communism & Socialism, a global, regional and national economic market of ‘Multistakeholderism’  over that of ‘Free-market Enterprise. A ‘Free-market Enterprise results in competition, lowering prices for consumers, people benefit from a higher standard of living. Countries have  the principles of Free-market Enterprise worldwide. Multistakeholderism  (Globalized Marxian Socialism)

In 2009 the WEF convened an ‘International Group’ meeting to formulate a new system of global governance. The meeting was led by  Klaus Schwab, Mark Malloch Brown and Richard Samans. Together they designed the  ‘Global Redesign Initiative’ (GRI). A system of ‘Multi-stakeholder Governance’.  In March 2019 a meeting was convened by the  Transnational Institute in Amsterdam which included -practitioners, researchers, activists  to critically examine, discuss in depth ‘multi-stakeholder governance’

2019 the UN announced they were unlikely to meet their set target to achieve UN Agenda SDGs by year 2030.  The Global Order was struggling hence a massive plan was made between the UN and WEF. Hence on the 13th June 2019 The WEF and UN signed a strategic official partnership the goal being to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 in a timely manner.  Sustainability hence became the global marketing advertising strategy. This was called  a ‘Narrow Window of Opportunity’ and ‘We Must Act Now’. There massive would include everyone-everywhere at every age of this planet, no-one was to be left behind.

Prior to the pandemic in 2019 IA2030-was introduced. ‘The Global Strategy of Vaccines’. (The Decade of Action). Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The  Gates Foundation supported the ‘Alliance of Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI),  all part and parcel of the new restructured ‘Global Order’- A ‘Global One World Public-Private Corporate Partnership’.  Included in this global one world aggressive determination to control people, planet for huge profit for a few wealthy billionaires. This globally promoted genderism being entrenched in Marxism- Socialism.  Self-interested parties found justification to enter genderism into  ‘economics, environment, politics, society and into the education curriculum. These global social changes are seeking to achieve a ‘universal citizenship’ New forms of citizenship status for  lesbian, bisexual, transgender and binary (LGBT) people globally

Under the veil of COVID19 you would have heard  “No-one is safe until all of us are safe’ these words have accompanied racial issues, ethnicity, age, occupation and gender . ‘Build Back Better’ its said will ‘accelerate gender equality’.  International Women’s Day Magazine ‘Make women the Decision Makers’-Launching ‘Gender Equal Cities’

Nationalism is under attack it is seen as a threat, intertwined within a patriarchal framework,-that exists within a sovereign nation  (references to  ’The Image of Man’ (Elias 2008) and ‘The Creation of Modern Masculinity’ (Mosse 1996)-Good modern man being co-opted into nationalism..  That nationalism relies on masculine technologies.

The Great Reset, The New Normal and The New Green Deal all embedded with Genderism.  ‘A Gender Transformative European Green Deal’, ‘Gender Equality and Climate Change’. UN Agenda 2030 SDGs include ‘Gender Equality’. Strengthening the development, awareness of ‘gender’.

The World Bank (2015) is contributing to the effort to reduce gender inequalities and UNESCO reiterates ‘gender transformative ‘policies. Advancing towards gender mainstreaming in water resources (Three Waters Reform)

He Puapua, every  New Zealander’s life to be impacted by UNDRIP  already being enacted out by the establishing of the Maori Health Authority.  15th January 2014 UNDRIP international gathering at the UN New York, the theme of the meeting being ‘UN Native Youth Sexual Health Network  included on the agenda- ‘Justice over our bodies goes beyond sexual health it is also a myriad of expressions of self-determination over our bodies’ (Indigenous Youth).  UNDRIP includes ‘Sexuality Wheel’ depicting, comprehending the concept of  ‘Sexuality’ as ‘Indigenous Two Spirit, LGBTTQQIA’ The UN states “While the UNDRIP does not explicitly name sexual and gender identities, the right to self determine sexual and gender identities are reinforced in the UNDRIP”

Jacinda Ardern was a guest speaker at a  gathering hosted by Melinda and Bill Gates, Ardern  boasted she was entering UN Agenda 2030 into NZ Domestic policies and that other countries should take her lead.. ‘LGBTQ  in included in UN Agenda 2030 SDG’s’ hence linkages between.   LGBTQ Inclusion and UN Agenda 2030.in the COVID19 Era. This Report is  SDG’s and LGBT’s that support business action.  LGBTQ has also be tagged onto COVID19 Response. UN Women’s Division ‘Beyond COVID19 Report’ determines a ‘Feminist Plan’ for Sustainability to Social Justice which includes- ‘Universal Gender Responsive Social Protection Systems’ hence advancing pathways to ‘Building Back Better’-

‘Transitions to a Gendered Sustainable Future-Systemic Crises’ plus ‘Gender and the Environment’. Enables a ‘Permissive Multilateral Approach ‘ to ‘Global Macroeconomic Governance’ The key levers to a ‘Green Gender’-A Equitable COVID Recovery.  Reinvigorating democracies powered by Feminist Politics. ‘Politics for Transformative Change’.  Diverse Feminist Movements. A ‘Global Feminist Social Contract’, imperative for Transformative Change. The Empowerment of Women and Girls- promote decreasing fertility rates world wide, strengthen and expand women into the workplace, to rapidly decrease fertility rates, population.(Marxist-Socialist Theory)

Genderism is  deeply embedded in the International Labour Org.,(ILO) which was established in 1919, became an agency of the UN when it was founded in 1945. Both the ILO and UN  have promoted depopulation globally over decades. The UN Population Div., produces datasets, selected indicators to measure fertility level tends world wide, linking population increase  and decrease to social, economic development and environmental change. (Malthusian Marxist Socialism). . Famous Socialist Marxist Paul Ehrlich a  Professor at Stanford University authored an Educational Textbook in 1968 ‘The Population Bomb’.. It was written using a’ Malthusian Socialist Marxist theory’.  Accessing consumption vs population levels. Ehrlich made suggested solutions for example   ‘ putting sterilant into food and water as a temporary measure’, .also that America should take the leading role in establishing population control as the US has prominence of the international stage.

Ehrlich’s book ‘The Population Bomb’ bludgeoned  global audiences with fear.  The Director of the Sierra Club -the oldest largest environmental organization in the world, suggested using  the book as a marketing strategy. In the last few decades concerns have shifted from rapid increased population to lowering fertility rates.

The UN Population Replacement Level Rate in 2.1, New Zealand sits on 1.6 and is likely to further decrease even further . Of course there is a pre-planned strategy to close the population replacement gap.. Is this the pre-planned solution? The Global Mayors Conventions discussed ‘Nationalism’ and the planning for many more ‘Smart Cities’ globally. The UN Assembly had already announced that ‘Nationalism is a threat to Multilateralism (Globalization). Could the plan be ‘kill two birds with one stone -Filling the Population Gap  and  targeting Nationalism.  These are the solutions discussed  (1) Fill the population gap by expanding  International and National Migration into Urban/City highly populated condensed areas ‘Smart Cities’  Target Nationalism by saturating NZ with 3rd world migrants hence replace Nationalism with Globalisation.

To achieve UN Agenda 2030 SDGs the global population rate is set at 8.5 billion by year 2030. The Global Development Goals include ‘Reproductive Health’.- Note:-Reproductive Health includes family planning, sterilization, abortions, LGBTQ surgeries and medications to limit fertility levels etc. The SDG’s include ‘expanding and promoting Gender Equality, Empowerment of Women and Girls hence decreasing  fertility level rates(Population Control-Globalised Socialism)

Since the establishment of the International Labour Org (1919) gender issues have been included. Since the establishment of the UN (1945) they have continuously promoted the decline of worldwide population rates, have monitored fertility level rates globally. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the oldest agency of the UN  adopted ‘Declaration of  Philadelphia in 1919  -The Global Fight for Gender Justice. ILO and UN Agencies are entrenched in Socialism.  The ILO, UN Agencies are entrenched in Marxism and Socialism. The ILO has a membership of 187 UN Member Nation States.  Could this be the reason there is no political opposition to the Labour Party in the stinky political toilet bowl in Wellington?

In the mid 1970’s the ILO and UN held  Global Women Conferences  in Beijing 1995 and another in 2013 in Mexico, these included transnational  legal encasements for a change in gender roles, interested gendered movements jumped on the bandwagon.   The UN called for  Global  Systemic Change to support Inter Sexual, Binary, Trans-sexual and  many more genders to Global Politics. Collaborating political, economical social and cultural rights and  progressive alliances for environmental sustainability, y namely radical  Eco-Feminism. Eco Feminism, Eco Churches that over emphasize the escalation of crises events:- Climate Alarmism and Future Pandemics also intertwining LGBTQ with  ‘renewable energy, sustainable agribusiness  and opposition to  Conservatism and Christianity. (Nationalism)

UN Women’s Division action plan is to transform the global economy, steer it towards gender equality for social justice and sustainability. Enabling a gendered environment based on reinforcing of financing, partnerships also including  computer data modelling as an evidence base which gives  justification for gendered actions. These will incorporate standards that will require enforceable actions if not complied to.  Many UN Member Nations already supportive of this..

LGBTQ movements have vested interests in  Socialist driven Trade Unions, alliances and coalitions, environmental groups they also infiltrate farmers groups and Religious Groups   NZ Trade Unions are pro NZ Govts Fair Pay Agreement that could further destroy businesses. Council Of Trade Union has a history of Socialist Marxism Communism

The UN Women’s  Division’s Feminist Plan includes expanding,  mobilizing  transformation LGBTQ as a broad global agenda. To achieve this  they must fill the evidence gaps in the global metric digital modelling system to strengthen  gender biases into data.

A foreign policy columnist wrote an article in the FP New ‘VOICE’ entitled “You Can’t Defeat Nationalism, so stop Trying article dated 4th June 2019. The most powerful force in the world is ‘nationalism’, a desire to gain national autonomy which drove Britain to leave the European Union. References made to Trump’s ‘Making America Great Again’.

Nationalism is central to China’s President Xi Ping. The UN is very fearful of uprising worldwide of Christian and Conservative national groups that are advancing National Sovereignty worldwide. When the  UN announced that Nationalism is the rising threat to Multilateralism, Donald Trump responded by saying that US taxpayers are the largest contributors  to the UN.

Russia’s UN Representative to the UN responded by cautioned powerful UN Member States not to use their dominance to behave in such a way. He also added that NATO was emphasizing alliance mind sets of catastrophic principles.  Antonio Guterres Secretary General of the UN  pointed out the importance of multilateralism.  NOTE: The key inclusions includes women and girls to enhance, accelerate UN Agenda 2030 SDGS and Targets.

So why is Nationalism such a threat to the UN? Perhaps its because human beings are social animals, we are born to be social beings from the moment we are born. Within our national communities we identify with in groups and out groups.  We have a common language and traditions, cultures which are unique identities. We are loyal to our country, and we honour, respect those that fought in terrible wars so we the citizens of NZ can have our freedoms.  This has become hugely evident that solidarity and loyalty exists during times of crisis. (COVID19 )  There are many loyal courageous  New Zealanders that are willing to stand up publicly for NZ, some willing to make sacrifices for our country.

Countries that have a more unified economies are more productive populations. Populations that stick together, survive together. Where there is a lack of Nationalism a country is at risk of being controlled by a tyrannous regime, an authoritative state especially in a ‘Free- market Enterprise Economy

Nationalism is still a powerful force to be  reckoned with, never doubt it. Yes, there is a huge attempt to plunder New Zealand and Sovereign Nations worldwide by this  Globalized Elitist Leftist Socialist Order that has been aggressively ushered in.

Ardern’s government is immoral, evil and reckless with the way they are treating New Zealanders lives. Sadly I say, many Kiwi’s believe they are good people because they are obedient to the government because they make the rules, and rules must be obeyed. We must awaken their ‘moral courage’ rip off the wool that covers those sheep’s eyes.

I personally believe, have  faith that many more Kiwi sheep will awaken -I pray it will be rather sooner than later. Remember that ‘Nationalism’ comprises of a MASSIVE POWERFUL FORCE that even frightens  the UN One World Global Government and the Wealthy Global Elite of the World Economic Forum.

Have faith, take the high road have ‘moral courage’ and in God’s name we can defeat the Godless. We have the strength of a number 8 wire. We stand in the memory of the war dead those that courageously fought for our freedoms and we will not let them die in vein

I leave you with this message:- When Hope knocks on your Door, let Faith answer it. God Bless.

NOTE: RESEARCH PRODUCED BY Carol Sakey

FACEBOOK PAGE: Carol Sakey.  FACEBOOK GROUP” WakeUpNZ

WEBSITE;   https://wakeupnz.org

 

...

THE IGNORED PANDEMIC: 360 MILLION CHRISTIANS PERSECUTED WORLDWIDE

The Ignored Pandemic: 360 Million Christians Persecuted Worldwide

A GLOBAL PANDEMIC THAT IS IGNORED:- 360 Million Christians Persecuted Worldwide. Reported February 13th 2022 by The Gladstone Institute International Policy Council  the persecution of Christians, which was already horrific, has increased by nearly 70% over the last five years, with no signs of abating. How long will it be before this seemingly irreversible trend metastasizes into those nations currently celebrated for their religious freedom?

The year 2021 “saw the worst persecution of Christians in history” — with an average of 16 Christians murdered for their faith every day.

That observation comes from the World Watch List-2022 (WWL-2022), recently published by the international humanitarian organization, Open Doors. The report each year ranks the top 50 countries where Christians are most persecuted for their faith. The WWL uses data from field workers and external experts to quantify and analyze persecution worldwide.

According to the WWL-2022, covering October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021:

Over 360 million Christians suffer high levels of persecution and discrimination for their faith—a rise of 20 million from last year. The number represents one in seven Christians worldwide. This year records the highest levels of persecution since the first list was published 29 years ago…”

For the same reporting period, 5,898 Christians were murdered “for their faith,” a number representing a 24% increase from 2021 (when “only” 4,761 Christians were killed). Additionally, “6,175 believers [were] detained without trial, arrested, sentenced or imprisoned,” and 3,829 abducted.

Perhaps even more reflective of the hate for Christianity, 5,110 churches and other Christian buildings (schools, monasteries, etc.), were attacked and profaned.

Crunching these numbers into daily averages, the above statistics mean that every day around the world, more than 16 Christians were murdered for their faith; 27 were either illegally arrested and imprisoned by non-Christian authorities or abducted by non-Christian actors; and 14 churches were destroyed or desecrated.

For the first time since these WWL reports were published, Afghanistan, which for years was usually ranked the #2 worst nation (after North Korea) shot up to the #1 spot, meaning “Afghanistan is now the most dangerous place in the world to be a Christian.” Additionally:

Christian men are facing almost certain death if their faith is discovered.  Women and girls may escape death but may be married to young Taliban fighters who want the “spoils of war.” After women and girls are raped, they are trafficked.

The incoming Taliban regime gained access to recordings and reports that helped to identify Christians. They were often detained, in order to identify networks of Christians, before being killed. Taliban fighters are still actively tracking down Christians from existing intelligence, sometimes going door-to-door to find them.

Ten other nations, after Afghanistan, received the same designation of “extreme persecution.” It means that these places, for Christians, are only marginally safer. They are: North Korea (#2), Somalia (#3), Libya (#4), Yemen (#5), Eritrea (#6), Nigeria (#7), Pakistan (#8), Iran (#9), India (#10), and Saudi Arabia (#11). In these countries, Christians face persecution ranging from being harassed, beaten, raped, imprisoned or slaughtered merely for being identified as a Christian or attending church.

Notably, the “extreme persecution” meted out to Christians in nine of these top 11 worst nations comes either from Islamic oppression or takes place in Muslim-majority nations. This trend affects the entire list: the persecution that Christians experience in 39 of the 50 nations on the list also comes either from Islamic oppression or occurs in Muslim majority nations. The overwhelming majority of these nations are governed by some form of shari’a (Islamic law). It can either be directly enforced by government or society or, more frequently, both, although societies — family members outraged in particular by relatives who have converted — tend to be more zealous in its application.

In a section titled, “Emboldened: The ‘Talibanization of West Africa and beyond,” the report suggests that this trend is worsening: “[T]he fall of Kabul has fuelled [sic] a new mood of invulnerability among other jihadist groups worldwide. The groups believe that they won’t face serious opposition from the West for their expansionist agendas and are exploiting nations with weak or corrupt governments…. Sub-Saharan Africa, already the place where violence against Christians is highest, has faced further steep rises in jihadist violence, with fears that a significant part of the region faces destabilization….”

In another section, the report elaborates:

“In Nigeria and Cameroon, Boko Haram continues to wreak havoc, the Islamic State group is active in West Africa and Mozambique, and al Shabab controls large portions of Somalia. It seems like nothing can be done to stop the advance of Islamic extremism.

“We know what radical Islamic ideology looks like for believers because we’ve seen it in Iraq and Syria. When ISIS took over parts of the Middle East, Christians were executed, abducted, sexually assaulted and hunted. Where groups like Boko Haram and al Shabab are active, similar threats are inevitable. When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, they tried to appear moderate—but there’s no sign that Christianity will be anything other than a death sentence.”

Although Islam continues to have the lions’ share of persecution, religious nationalism in non-Muslim nations is also causing them to rise in the ranks. In Myanmar (#12),

“Converts to Christianity … find themselves persecuted by their Buddhist, Muslim or tribal families and communities because they have left their former faith and have thereby removed themselves from community life. Communities who aim to stay ‘Buddhist only’ make life for Christian families impossible by not allowing them to use neighborhood water resources.”

Rising Hindu nationalism has catapulted India into #10, among the “extreme persecuting” nations:

“The persecution of Christians in India has intensified, as Hindu extremists aim to cleanse the country of their presence and influence. The extremists disregard Indian Christians and other religious minorities as true Indians, and think the country should be purified of non-Hindus. This has led to a systemic—and often violent—targeting of Christians and other religious minorities, including use of social media to spread disinformation and stir up hatred. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered a new weapon to persecutors. In some areas, Christians have been deliberately overlooked in the local distribution of government aid and have even been accused of spreading the virus.”

Several other nations have, one way or another, exploited COVID-19 to discriminate against or persecute Christians. For example, “COVID-19 gave Chinese authorities (#17) a reason to shut down many churches—and keep them shut.”

Similarly, in Qatar, “Violence against Christians rose sharply because many churches were forced to stay closed after COVID-19 restrictions.” Moreover, Qatar—”host for this year’s World Cup, where converts from Islam especially face physical, psychological and (for women) sexual violence”—jumped 11 spots (now #18, from #29 last year).

In Bangladesh (#29), local authorities told Muslim converts to Christianity who, like their Muslim counterparts, sought governmental aid, “to return to Islam or receive nothing.” As one Bangladeshi explained, “We see many villagers and neighbours receive relief aid from government support but we Christians do not get any support.”

In the Central African Republic, which was “hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic … Christians were denied government aid and told to convert to Islam if they wanted to eat.”

Another notable trend concerns the growing number of internally or externally displaced people — 84 million: “a significant number [of whom] are Christians fleeing religious persecution.” Those Christians that end up as refugees in neighbouring Muslim nations “can be denied humanitarian and other practical assistance by authorities.”

Additionally:- “Christian women fleeing their homes and seeking safety report sexual assault to be the leading source of persecution, with multiple reports of women and children subjected to rape, sexual slavery, and more, both in camps and while they journey in search of safety. Poverty and insecurity compound their vulnerability, with some drawn into prostitution to survive. As jihadism spreads and destabilizes nations, we can expect this Christian exodus to multiply further.”

Although the report is limited to the 50 worst persecuting nations, it appears that persecution in general is growing around the world. For example, although North Korea is now ranked #2, as a reflection of how bad matters have gotten overall, the report explains that “The persecution score for North Korea actually went up [compared to last year], even though its ranking went down.”

Similarly, hate crimes against Christianity in Western Europe are at an all-time high. According to a November 16, 2021 report by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at least a quarter, though arguably much more, of all hate crimes registered in Europe in 2020 were anti-Christian — representing a 70% increase compared to 2019. Christianity is, furthermore, the religion most targeted in hate crimes, with Judaism at a close second. There are, however, significantly fewer Jews worldwide (roughly 15 million) than Christians (2.8 billion.

Although media outlets rarely identify those behind these anti-Christian hate crimes, many of which revolve around the vandalism of churches, it is telling that the European nations suffering the most also happen to have Europe’s largest Muslim populations — namely, Germany (where anti-Christian hate crimes have more than doubled since 2019) and France (where two churches are reportedly attacked every day, some, as in the Muslim world, with human feces).

As a reflection of how bad persecution has gotten elsewhere around the globe, no Western European nation made the top 50 list.

In the end, perhaps the most disturbing trend is that the number of persecuted Christians continues to grow annually. As seen, according to the newest statistics, 360 million Christians around the world are experiencing “high levels of persecution and discrimination.” This represents a 6% increase from 2021, when 340 million Christians experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 31 % increase from 2020, when 260 million Christians experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 6% increase from 2019, when 245 million experienced the same level of persecution; and that number represented a 14% increase from 2018, when 215 million was the number

In short, the persecution of Christians, which was already horrific, has increased by nearly 70% over the last five years, with no signs of abating.  How long will it be before this seemingly irreversible trend metastasizes into those nations currently celebrated for their religious freedom?

 

 

Christian Persecution by the Numbers – Open Doors USA – Open Doors USA

...