MORAL COURAGE: Requires obligation to honour  “what is the right thing to do”? – Danger management “What do I need to handle my fear”?  Expression and action “What action do I need to take to maintain my integrity”?  Sadly I say the masses lack ‘Moral Courage’.

INTEGRITY: Means being honest and having strong moral principles.

ATTRIBUTES OF INTEGRITY:  (1) Dependability, this means people can rely on you and that you keep promises. (2) Loyalty, a strong support or allegiance. (3) Honesty. Integrity itself requires honesty. Honesty is a refusal to lie, steal, deceive in any way.  (4)Good judgement.- is to consider the consequences of ones decisions, thinking before acting and having the tools to make good decisions in various situations.  (5)Respect builds feelings of trust, safety and wellbeing. Being considerate of peoples feelings, self discipline and making responsible choices to reach personal goals. Respect owed morally regardless of social position, individual characteristics or achievements or merit.

COMMON MORALITY: The moral system that thoughtful people use, usually implicitly when they make moral decisions and judgements. The behaviour that affects others.

CARE VS HARM: (a) Fairness vs Cheating,  (b) Behavior must be fair and just.  (c) Liberty vs Oppression.  (d) Tyrannical oppression is wrong.  (e) Loyalty vs Betrayal.  (f) Morality requires faithfulness to a group or another individual.

CONTRA BONOS MORES’:”Our society prohibits, and all human societies have prohibited, certain activities not because they harm others but because they are considered, in the traditional phrase, ‘contra bonos mores,’ i.e., immoral.” -Justice Antonin Scalia

Common law is seen as a system shaped by ‘morality’

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEFINE LAW AND NATURAL LAW: Divine law comes directly from God, whilst Natural law is inherent in human beings. Devine and Natural law are ancient concepts that govern human behaviour.  Human beings possess intrinsic values that govern their reasoning and behaviour

SUBSUMING NATURAL LAW INTO COMMON LAW: Blackstone’s Commentaries served as the primary educational basis for newly emerging proprietary schools and, from 1817, university law schools, such as Harvard’s under the leadership of Joseph Story.

LEGISLATION AND MORALS: But NOT the same circumference. The State puts its own sanction behind moral rules that are enforced by them (Moral vs Immoral). Hence many immoral acts are not illegal eg sexual acts- such as Drag Queen Story Time for children,  and laws that are based on morals, and may be even opposed to morals eg; technical matters, traffic laws etc.,

THE TEST OF LAW: Morals as test of law: several jurists have observed that law must conform to morals, and the law which does not conform to morals must be disobeyed and the government which makes such law should be overthrown. The purpose of the law is do justice.

THEORECTICAL MORALS: The Greeks in the name of the doctrine of natural rights formulated a theoretical moral foundation of law. The Roman jurists in the name of ‘natural law recognised certain moral principles as the basis of law. In the middle Ages, the Church became dominant in Europe. The natural law was given a theological basis and Christian morals were considered as the basis of law.

THE POST REFORMATION OF EUROPE: Modern trends: In the post-Reformation Europe (when the yoke of the Church was thrown off) it was asserted that law and morals are distinct and separate, and law derives its authority from the state and not from the morals.

RELIGION ’MORALS’: Morals have their source in the religion or conscience. However, in the 17th and 18th centuries natural law theories became very popular and, more or less, they had a moral foundation. Law again came to be linked with morals.

THE SOVEREIGN ‘MORALS’:  In the 19th century, Austin propounded his theory that the law has nothing to do with the morals. He defined law as the command of the sovereign. He further said that it was law (command) alone which is subject-matter of jurisprudence. Morals are not a subject-matter of study for jurisprudence.

‘THE STUDY OF LAW ‘MORALS’: In the 20th century, Kelsen said that only the legal norms are the subject-matter of jurisprudence. He excluded all other extraneous things including the morals from the study of law. There is a change in trend of thought in modern times.

THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO LAW ‘MORALS’: The distinction between law and  morals and the forces that influence the development, function and ends of laws studies which extended to various social sciences including morals

THE PRIVY COUNCIL: Decision making always made a distinction between legal and moral injunctions. Law is now being codified.

THE GENIUS OF COMMON LAW: The mix of adaptability and consistency.. When new circumstances arise, common law courts, urged on and educated by the parties to disputes, adapt existing rules in ways that they believe produce the most just and fair outcomes.

COMPARABLE CASES: They look for comparable cases in their own and other jurisdictions to learn what adaptation of existing law will produce the best results. Over time, new doctrines emerge and old ones may die out. But at any given time there is a stable rule‐set people can use to organize their lives and business activities.

COMMON LAW OF PRIVACY:  The ‘Right to Privacy’. Law should explicitly protect privacy. n 1960 eminent legal scholar William L. Prosser documented how privacy as a legal concept had come to constitute four distinct torts: intrusion upon seclusion or solitude, or into private affairs; public disclosure of embarrassing private facts; publicity that places a person in a false light in the public eye; and appropriation of name or likeness. The common law of privacy continues to develop and advance

THE MORAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY:  This is a fundamental right, essential to autonomy and the  protection of human dignity, serving as the foundation upon which many other human rights are built. Thus shields us from the contexts of providing certain freedom and independence- freedom from scrutiny, prejudice, pressure to conform, exploitation, and the judgement of others.

THE INSTRINSIC VALUES ‘MORALS’:  Morals look to the intrinsic value of conduct or in other words, they look into motive. Law is concerned with the conduct of the individual for which it lays down standards.

THE SMOOTH RUNNING OF SOCIETY ‘MORALS’:  Morals are an end in themselves. They should be followed because they are good in themselves. Law is for the purpose of convenience and expediency, and its chief aim is to help a smooth running of the society.

INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE ‘MORALS’: The observance of morals is a matter of individual conscience. Law brings into picture the complete machinery of the state where the individual submits himself to the will of the organised society and is bound to follow its rules.

UNIVERSAL LAW ‘MORALS’: The morals are considered to be of universal value. Law is relative-related to the time and place, and, therefore, it varies from society to society. Law and morals, again, differ in their application. The morals are applied taking into consideration the individual cases whereas the application of law is uniform.

MORAL PRINCIPLES AND LEGAL PERCEPTS: It is said that moral principles are of individual and relative application; they must be applied with reference to circumstances and individuals, whereas legal rules are of general and absolute application.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND MORALS:  The distinction between the two, they are very closely related to each other. In considering the relationship between law and morals much will depend on how one defines law. Analytical, Historical, Philosophical and Sociological jurists all have defined law in their own way and these definitions materially differ from each other.

MORALS THE BASIS OF LAW:  All the rules originated from the common source, and the sanction behind them was of the same nature (mostly supernatural fear). In the early stages of the society no distinction was made between law and morals.

MORAL’S A TESTS OF LAW: It has been contended by a number of jurists, since very early times, that law must conform to morals. This view was supported by the Greeks and the Romans. In Rome, law to some extent, was made to conform to ‘natural law’ which was based on certain moral principles and as a result ‘jus civil’ was transformed into ‘jus gentium’.

ANCIENT JURISTS ‘NATURAL LAW: Most of the ancient jurists expressed their views in a spirit of compromise and attached sanctity to legal rules and institutions. They said that law, even if it is not in conformity with morals, is valid and binding.

NATURAL LAW ‘MORALS’: During the Dark Ages, Christian Fathers preached forcefully that law conform to Christian morals and said that any law against it is invalid. In the 17th and the 18th centuries, when the ‘natural law’ theory (which was based on certain morals) was at its highest, it was contended that law (positive law) must conform to natural law.

NON-CONFORMITY TO NATURAL LAW: Law which does not conform to natural law is to be disobeyed and the government which makes such law should be overthrown. It was this theory which inspired the French Revolution.  In modern times, such views that law must conform to morals and if it is not in conformity with morals, it is not valid and binding are no longer heard. However, in practice to a great extent law conforms to morals.

MORALS AS THE BASIS OF LAW: Many of the modern definitions of law say that the evaluation of interests is a very important test of law. This can be done properly in the context of socially recognised values which in their turn are closely related to morals. Thus, ultimately morals become the end of law.  This end has been expressed in the constitutions of many countries. If we look at the preamble of our own Constitution, we shall find that the ends which it endeavours to achieve are the morals; of course, they are the morals of the modern age.

MORALS AT THE END OF LAW: Morals have often been considered to be the end of law. A number of eminent jurists have defined law in terms of, ‘justice’. They say that the aim of ‘law’ is to secure justice. Justice in its popular sense is very much based upon morals. In most of the languages of the world, the words used for law convey an idea of justice and morals also. According to analytical jurists, any study of the ends of law falls beyond the domain of jurisprudence

THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO MORALS: Law has always a purpose; it is a means to an end, and this end is the welfare of the society. According to this utilitarian point of view, the immediate end of law is to secure social interests, that is, to secure harmony of claims or demands. It means that the conflicting interests (in the society) should be weighed and evaluated and the interests who can bring greater benefit with the least sacrifice should be recognized and protected.

EVALUATION OF INTERESTS: All becomes a question of choice. In making this choice and in weighing or evaluating interest, whether in legislation or judicial decision, or juristic writing, whether we do it by law making or in the application of law, we must turn to ethics for principles. Morals are an evaluation of interests; law is or at least seeks to be delimitation in accordance therewith.

MORALS AND  ‘PUBLIC OPINION’: Greatly influences law is made up of a number of things-political ideas, economic theory, ethical philosophy, etc. These directly and indirectly influence law.  Therefore, when so many elements work in shaping the legal precepts, the matter cannot be put in such a simple way as the relation between law and morals, because a number of factors join hands in influencing law, and morals is only one of them. However, some observations can be made about the relation between law and morals.

INFLUENCE OF MORALS ON LAW:  Law and morals act and react upon and mould each other. In the name of ‘justice’, ‘equity’, ‘good faith’, and ‘conscience’ morals have in filtered into the fabrics of law. In judicial law making, in the interpretation of legal precepts, in exercising judicial discretion (as in awarding punishment) moral considerations play a very important role.

MORALS WORK AS RESTRAINTS: Upon the power of the legislature because the legislature cannot venture to make a law which is completely against the morals of the society. Secondly, all human conduct and social relations cannot be regulated and governed by law alone. No positivist could deny that these are facts or that the stability of legal systems depends in part upon such types of correspondence with morals. If this is what is meant by the necessary connation of law and morals, its existence should be conceded.

THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF MORALS: This approach is more concerned with the ends that law has to pursue. Thus, recognised, or, in other words, morals (of course the morals of the modern age) have become a very important subject of study for good law making. On international law also morals are exercising a great influence.

THE NUREMBERG TRIALS: The brutalities and inhuman acts in World Wars made the people to turn back to morals and efforts are being made to establish standards and values which the nations must follow. Perhaps there is no other so forceful ground to justify the Nuremberg Trials as morals. If the law is to remain closer to the life of the people and effective, it must not ignore morals.

MORAL COURAGE:  Moral courage is the ability to stand up for and practice that which one considers ethical, moral behaviour when faced with a dilemma, even if it means going against countervailing pressure to do otherwise. It is the ability to stand up for and practice that which one considers ethical, moral behavior when faced with a dilemma, even if it means going against countervailing pressure to do otherwise

LINKS:

Dr. B.N.Tripathi, Jurisprudence Legal theory, (Allahabad Law Agency, Haryana).

Difference between law and morals, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=68341§ion=3.2.

Satoshi Kodama, Bentham’s Distinction between Law and Morality and Its Contemporary Significance-La distinction que fait Bentham entre droit et morale, et son importance actuelle,https://journals.openedition.org/etudes-benthamiennes/6378.

Liam Murphy, The Boundary of Law: Law, Morality, and the Concept of Law, October 28, 2004, https://ethics.harvard.edu/event/boundary-law-law-morality-and-concept-law.

https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1888-law-and-morality-in-the-light-of-jurisprudence.html

REGULATING MORALITY THROUGH THE COMMON LAW AND EXCLUSIONARY ZONING 2011  https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3237&context=lawreview

RESEARCHED BY : CAROL SAKEY    WEBSITE:  https://wakeupnz.org

POST CABINET PRESS CONFERENCE…6^th October 2021.HANSARD TRANSCRIPT – BEEHIVE. Chris Hipkins and Dr. McElnay answering questions posed by the Press. Dr McElnay is a NZ Medical Officer, she was the Director Of Public Health for the NZ Ministry Of Health (Govt) She was appointed a ‘Companion of the Queens Service Order for services to public health in the 2023 New Year Honours List. She worked for the NZ Ministry Of Health from 2016-2022

GAP IN JAB UPTAKE ‘We need to protect ourselves, our whanau, our communities. We need as many people as possible to have their 1^st jab to be partially protected. We need them to be fully vaccinated asap. Now enabling the 2^nd dose sooner, so people can be fully jabbed sooner, hence increase community immunity ..said Dr.McAcElnay

Chris Hipkins said : “How tricky the virus can be to manage” and “how dangerous it can be” and “COVID19 is tracking down unjabbed people, its making them sick” Our job is to get to the unjabbed people “before COVID19 finds them”. And refereed to the NORTH vs SOUTH ISLAND: – “We are an innately competitive country, its worth noting the North and South Island are neck to neck in the race to be the most jabbed island” Adding “Another piece of our plan continually improve accessibility to EVERYONE” Call the COVID19 Healthline ‘ITS FREE’.

Hipkins said “By far, the biggest, most powerful weapon we have in our fight against COVID19 is vaccination (JAB)/ Reduces rate of transmission. They are safe and everyone over 12 yrs of age can get one” and “We’ve got plenty of vax to go around” (It’s a weapon and they do not even know what it fully contains). “.Our strategy is to vigorously pursue cases that emerge “Zero cases in the community is unlikely”,  NZrs have shown they are willing  to pitch in be a Team of 5 Million (he refers to whole population-Team of 5million). We need you to channel your energy into giving  the FINAL PUSH (The Team of 5 Million)

“We can be the most vaccinated country in the world. We need a big collective push”. We ALL have a role to play to get vax rates up” NZrs who have had their 1^st dose, your job is not yet done” Make sure you get your 2^nd dose. Reach out to others who have not yet been vaxed” and “You need to help us get them comfortable with being vaxed, talk to them about the reasons you have chosen to be vaxed”. And “we want you to help make sure they get reliable, honest information about the vax. We want you to help deal with an logistical barriers that has stopped them from being vaxed”.  Its is critical. :We want to pull out the stops to increase our vax rates. Its never been more urgent than now” ITS URGENT- ITS CRITICAL..(But jab never tested for transmission begore going to global market place)

We are asking EVERYONE to contribute to a BIG NATIONWIDE push for Vaccination. Referring to Oct 16^th Super Saturday. All vax clinics open day and evening, just like election day, all our civic leaders and political leaders will contribute, make a big effort on that day. What we need now is DEMAND. We are releasing maps that show where the highest concentrations of unvaxed people, who are by suburb.. This will help our IWI who are pushing local communities and our local MPS would work together to mobilise their communities, whether going door to door, working the phones, waving signs, there is a role for everyone to play

We are asking media and the business community groups to play a role. Offer incentives to the unvaxed. Parents, grandparents encourage young NZrs to be vaxed. No-one should be left behind, no stone (UN AGENDA 2030 Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age) People need to make an informed choice about vaccination. NZs response is world leading uptake of vaccination, so I request everyone pitch in, lets get it done. EVERYONE- THE TEAM OF 55 MILLION. BUT THE CONTENTS OF THE JAB ARE A TRADE SECRET

Media asked Hipkins: How many gang members are in the current cluster?  Hipkis response “I don’t’s know, he asks Dr. McAlnay whether she has a precise figure” RESPONSE: No=I I don’t have a precise number, saying “Its quite a large number of gang member in this outbreak. Hipkins Replies YES. But a second previously he said “I don’t know how many”. HIPKINS reponded “Its about contract tracing, getting tested, getting vaxed” HOWEVER THE VAX HAD NOT BEEN TESTED FOR TRANSMISSION BEFORE ENTERING THE GLOBAL MARKET 

MEDIA QUESTION TO HIPKINS Is it your understanding the drug deal has been part of the transmission of COVID in this cluster? HIPKINS: I don’t have any information. I could speculate like everyone else. (SO-EVERYONE ELSE IS SPECULATING).  “How many special exemptions have been given to gang members, that have come into Auckland to help facilitate the vax, or testing regime?” HIPKINS-“Me personally have not given the exemptions” and “as far as I know two” (worms his way around the question). : How important is it that the Mongrel Mob leaders get out there and talk with people, who may not be listening to the press, or government messaging?. Adding “There is a lot of criticism of the Govt, that exemptions have been given to gang members, and how many gang members have caught COVID19?

CHRIS HIPKINS RESPONSE :Where we have been able to enlist gang member to help with contact tracing and testing, we have done that. Look, I have no time for gangs, have no sympathy for them, but COVID is number one priority

MEDIA to HIPKINS: “When people ask “why are you giving gangs special treatment what do you say”? HIPKINS RESPONSE:- “Where we needed to reach into places, where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we do.  Look, if there was another community organisation or some other entity where we needed to get someone in in order to make sure we were reaching into the places where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we would do.”

MEDIA TO HIPKINS:” Is there anyone with COVID unaccounted for at the moment?”HIPKINS: With contact tracing we are doing our absolute best to find them” And “Everyone that has been identified as a positive case is accounted for”

MEDIA: Can stadiums open under Alert Leve; 2 with more than 100 people”?  HIPKINS-‘ Did not know, said he would have to check it out”

Media: Can I just clarify some of the rules, because there’s still some confusion about the phase 1, mainly because the Government put up different sets of rules for these things. Can playgrounds open? Hipkins replied “Yes”. Then was asked  “Can you go to the toilet at your friends house if you are there for a bbq”?  HIPKINS-“NO”, not unless its an outside one                                                    THE INSANITY CONTINUES.– “Inside- Outside whats the difference”?)

MEDIA ASKED HIPKINS: “A mother was denied passage through the Auckland border for parenting arrangement because her parenting arrangement was whangai and not sanctioned by the court. Do you think that fair?” HIPKINS: “Very difficult to answer”

MEDIA: Can you give us more details about the deceased? Eg: How old, how long they have been in hospital, did they have underlying conditions?  Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details,. Media replied “Sorry, why wouldn’t you have those details? I mean it’s a pretty big piece of information that’s— Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details.” I only had details this morning.” Adding  “This morning was hours ago”

MEDIA: Rapid antigen testing is still in the trial phase so they haven’t been able to use that, is that correct? And have they been able to use saliva testing? Have they been able to go door to door?

HIPKINS: Rapid Antigen tests, there is international evidence they are good at detecting acute infections. PCR Tests are the best option that pick up the virus earlier.  Hipkins replied-“Rapid antigen tests are considerably less accurate when they are used in people with no signs or symptoms of infection. There is much evidence that RAT tests produce false positives and false negatives are not reliable. And then Media referred to 25 large business who were asking for RAT 370,000 RAT testing kits within the next 7 days. Hipkins responded “One of the reasons we’ve been reluctant in NZ is that they are NOT GOOD at detecting acute infection. And NOT SO GOOD at detecting the early onset of the infection. They potentially give people FALSE comfort

HIPKINS: Fairly soon RAT Tests will become part of our bigger response. BUT DIDN’T HE SAY THEY ARE NOT GOOD AT DETECTING INFECTION

MEDIA Then asked Hipkins “On encouraging every Kiwi to get vaxed, how would you start those conversations with the vax hesitant? Hipkins continued with ““How tricky the virus can be to manage” and “how dangerous it can be” and “COVID19 is tracking down unjabbed people, its making them sick” Our job is to get to the unjabbed people “before COVID19 finds them”

NORTH vs SOUTH ISLAND: Hipkins “We are an innately competitive country, its worth noting the North and South Island are neck to neck in the race to be the most jabbed island”.

Hipkins stated that the COVID19 Jab is “by far, the biggest, most powerful weapon we have in our fight against COVID19 is vaccination (JAB)/ Reduces rate of transmission. They are safe and everyone over 12 yrs of age can get one” and “We’ve got plenty of vax to go around” (It’s a weapon and they do not even know what it fully contains). He said that “our strategy is to vigorously pursue cases that emerge “Zero cases in the community is unlikely”,  NZrs have shown they are willing  to pitch in be a Team of 5 Million (he refers to whole population-Team of 5million), that we need you to channel your energy into giving  the FINAL PUSH (The Team of 5 Million). Stating “We can be the most vaccinated country in the world. We need a big collective push”. We ALL have a role to play to get vax rates up” NZrs who have had their 1^st dose, your job is not yet done” Make sure you get your 2^nd dose. Reach out to others who have not yet been vaxed. We want you to help make sure they get reliable, honest information about the vax. We want you to help deal with an logistical barriers that has stopped them from being vaxed”. Its is critical. :We want to pull out the stops to increase our vax rates. Its never been more urgent than now”

NOTE: ITS URGENT- ITS CRITICAL..(But jab never tested for transmission beFore entering the global market place)

Hipkins in pushing the jabs nationwide said “We are asking EVERYONE to contribute to a BIG NATIONWIDE push for Vaccination. Referring to Oct 16^th Super Saturday. All vax clinics open day and evening, just like election day, all our civic leaders and political leaders will contribute, make a big effort on that day. What we need now is DEMAND. We are releasing maps that show where the highest concentrations of unvaxed people, who are by suburb. This will help our IWI who are pushing local communities and our local MPS would work together to mobilise their communities, whether going door to door, working the phones, waving signs, there is a role for everyone to play

We are asking media and the business community groups to play a role. Offer incentives to the unvaxed. Parents, grandparents encourage young NZrs to be vaxed. No-one should be left behind, no stone unturned.    NOTE: UN AGENDA 2030 Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. He added ” People need to make informed choices about vaccination, that NZs response is a world leading one as to the uptake of vaccination, so I request everyone pitch in, lets get it done.

NOTE: EVERYONE- THE TEAM OF 55 MILLION. BUT THE CONTENTS OF THE JAB ARE A TRADE SECRET

Media asked Hipkins: How many gang members are in the current cluster?  Hipkis response “I don’t’s know, he asks Dr. McAlnay whether she has a precise figure” RESPONSE: No=I I don’t have a precise number

MEDIA says: Its quite a large number of gang member in this outbreak. Hipkins Replies YES. But a second previously he said “I don’t know how many”

HIPKINS: “Its about contract tracing, getting tested, getting vaxed” BUT THE VAX HAD NOT BEEN TESTED FOR TRANSMISSION BEFORE ENTERING THE GLOBAL MARKET

MEDIA QUESTION TO HIPKINS Is it your understanding the drug deal has been part of the transmission of COVID in this cluster? HIPKINS: I don’t have any information. I could speculate like everyone else. (SO-EVERYONE ELSE IS SPECULATING) And “How many special exemptions have been given to gang members, that have come into Auckland to help facilitate the vax, or testing regime?” HIPKINS responded -“Me personally have not given the exemptions” and “as far as I know two” (worms his way around the question)

MEDIA asks Hipkins: How important is it that the Mongrel Mob leaders get out there and talk with people, who may not be listening to the press, or government messaging? There is a lot of criticism of the Govt, that exemptions have been given to gang members, and how many gang members have caught COVID19?. Hipkins response “Where we have been able to enlist gang member to help with contact tracing and testing, we have done that. Look, I have no time for gangs, have no sympathy for them, but COVID is number one priority”

MEDIA to HIPKINS: “When people ask “why are you giving gangs special treatment what do you say”? HIPKINS RESPONSE:- “Where we needed to reach into places, where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we do.  Look, if there was another community organisation or some other entity where we needed to get someone in in order to make sure we were reaching into the places where we needed to reach to, then that’s exactly what we would do.

MEDIA TO HIPKINS:” Is there anyone with COVID unaccounted for at the moment?”HIPKINS replied  “With contact tracing we are doing our absolute best to find them” And “Everyone that has been identified as a positive case is accounted for”

MEDIA: Can stadiums open under Alert Leve; 2 with more than 100 people”?  HIPKINS-‘ Did not know, said he would have to check it out”

Media: Can I just clarify some of the rules, because there’s still some confusion about the phase 1, mainly because the Government put up different sets of rules for these things. Can playgrounds open? Hipkins said “Yes”. Media adds “Can you go to the toilet at your friends house if you are there for a bbq”? Hipkins replied ‘NO’, not unless its an outside toilet”

MEDIA ASKED HIPKINS: “A mother was denied passage through the Auckland border for parenting arrangement because her parenting arrangement was whangai and not sanctioned by the court. Do you think that fair?” HIPKINS: “Very difficult to answer”.  MEDIA: Can you give us more details about the deceased? Eg: How old, how long they have been in hospital, did they have underlying conditions?  Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details,. Media again jumps in asking “Why wouldn’t you have those details? I mean it’s a pretty big piece of information”— Dr McElnay: I don’t have those details.” I only had details this morning.”. Media adds “This morning was hours ago”

MEDIA: Rapid antigen testing is still in the trial phase so they haven’t been able to use that, is that correct? And have they been able to use saliva testing? Have they been able to go door to door?

HIPKINS: Rapid Antigen tests, there is international evidence they are good at detecting acute infections. PCR Tests are the best option that pick up the virus earlier.

NOTE:  Rapid antigen tests are considerably less accurate when they are used in people with no signs or symptoms of infection. There is much evidence that RAT tests produce false positives and false negatives are not reliable.

MEDIA: Referred to 25 large business who were asking for RAT 370,000 RAT testing kits within the next 7 days.

HIPKINS SAID: One of the reasons we’ve been reluctant in NZ is that they are NOT GOOD at detecting acute infection. And NOT SO GOOD at detecting the early onset of the infection. They potentially give people FALSE comfort. Hipkins went on to say “Fairly soon RAT Tests will become part of our bigger response.”  BUT DIDN’T HE SAY THEY ARE NOT GOOD AT DETECTING INFECTION

MEDIA Then asked Hipkins “On encouraging every Kiwi to get vaxed, how would you start those conversations with the vax hesitant? Hipkins responded by saying “Those that have had the motivation to be vaxed, helps the unvaxed. When people ask “What does the vax do? Questions about MRNA nature of the vax. A Health practitioner is best bet. Refer to those Health Practitioners speaking online. And to the Mainstream Media. (Like Dr McAnally who was then working for the Ministry of Health and Mainstream Media having been purchased by the Govt” Dr McAnaulty adds “Seek conversations with trusted people, there is a wide range of Health Professionals, speak with them get the real facts.”

NOTE; Health Professionals most wont speak up because they will be de-registered from the Medical Council. Character assassinated by the Propaganda Machine. Those who have are no longer practicing because of that.

MEDIA: Referring to a 63 Yr old man was arrested and charged in connection with a protest at the Domain Auckland. Are you glad to see the police taking this sort of action, and would you encourage more of it? But Hipkins avoided getting into this, stated this was a matter for the police

MEDIA: Referring to Misinformation and other countries regulating algorithms. Are you going to ask Google, Facebook to reduce misinformation for the Super Saturday Vax Event? Hipkins said  “Facebook and Google from what I have seen have been quite proactive in removing some of the biggest sources of information in NZ. He added “I would ask social media companies to continue to be proactive in managing misinformation, where there are people who don’t have the right facts”

NOTE “Jacinda Ardern: “We will continue to be your single source of truth… Unless you hear it from us it is not the truth.”

MEDIA  – Media: Medical professionals have raised major concern that roadside drug testing is unreliable. Will you hold on pushing this through Parliament? Hipkins replied “Roadside testing does not fit into my domain. Address that question to the relevant minister. NOTE; Hipkins is the COVID19 Health & Response Minister,

 MEDIA: Would you be concerned if it were unreliable then would you like seeing this being pushed through? Hipkins response was “Its outside my domain. Can’t comment on it.”

NEW ZEALAND’S ALGORITHM CHARTER: Ardern introduced first Algorithm Charter in he world. Algorithms made up of teeny weeny invisible codes. (Says TRUST US). Shared with all Govt agencies, including police.  (Beehive 28/7/2020). Beehive Speech NEW ALGORITH CHARTER WORLDS FIRST.. Being used effectively across all govt agencies. Algorithms play a crucial role to make connections, identify relationships patterns across vast quantities of information. But James Shaw reports: NOT WITHOUT RISKS.. The Algorithm Charter was signed by 21 agencies, embedded in Te Ao Maori perspective and use of algorithms. Māori should be involved at the very beginning of the algorithm design process

New Zealand Police have commissioned a stocktake of algorithms  used to inform an algorithm governance policy for the future, including model life-cycle management. The charter commitments are specifically referenced in this work. ALGORITH CHARTER referenced for use in Police, COVID19 Misinformation-Disinformation online and the Christchurch Call. Censorship, surveillance information, data NZ Citizens and overseas visitors whom are public speakers.

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2021-10/Hipkins%2C%20Dr%20McElnay%20Press%20Conference%206%20October.pdf

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-algorithm-charter-world-first

https://data.govt.nz/assets/data-ethics/algorithm/Algorithm-Charter-Year-1-Review-FINAL.pdf

These links are reference to my last two video’s on this subject. 2020-2030 Global Sexualization of children (UN). UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals (SDGs). Documented in the UN Technical Brief of Anti School Bullying in Schools globally Studies and Surveys of schools students

LINK Several approaches were used for questioning students about themselves, in these UN Surveys, studies  March 2019 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

Several approaches were used for questioning students about themselves, in these UN Surveys, studies  March 2019 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

A first example is provided by the 2015 Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance System (YRBS), conducted by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the USA.  Statistically analysed together with a sub-group of bisexual respondents, another subgroup identified ‘Not Sure: of gender.

Youth2000 survey in New Zealand. This is conducted among 9-13 year olds and, since 2012, has included a question about whether students self-identify as transgender. The sample for the most recent survey (2012) involved students being randomly selected from 91 schools that, in turn, were randomly selected from all eligible schools (those with at least 50 students) from across the country.

The resulting sample – of 8,500 respondents – proved large and representative enough for the implementers to find that 1.2% of students identify as transgender – a figure that is significant enough to enable statistical comparisons (Clark, et al., 2013).

UNESCO-supported study in four countries in Southern Africa, questionnaires used in schools referred to gender non-conforming students as ‘people who are seen as different in terms of gender (boys who look or act like girls; girls who look like or act like boys)’.

Auckland University Sample size 28,000. Conducted 2001, 2008, 2012  9-13 yr olds   www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/faculty/adolescent-health-research-group/youth2000-national-youth-health-survey-series.html

Source. http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs Global school-based student health survey Type: School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

Source: Growing up today study 2 Type: Population-based survey. Country: USA. Population: Children of Nurses’ Health Study participants. Age: 10-17 year olds (2004). Sample size: 10,900. Frequency: Annually since 2004. Further information: www.gutsweb.org

https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/nsduh-national-survey-drug-use-and-health

From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=3226

Transgender Age: 14-18 year olds (Grades 9-12). Sample size: Varies. Further information: http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs

Age: 12-18 year olds (Grades 7-12). Sample size: 14,400. Frequency: 1994–2008 (longitudinal). Further information: http://cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth

School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: 2018. Further information:https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

Respondents  were given a  range of gender identity options. EG., whether or not they self-identify as transgender. The following are two examples of best practice questions about gender identity.

Example 2: Question: Do you think you are transgender? This is a girl who feels like she should have been a boy, or a boy who feels like he should have been a girl. (e.g. Trans, Queen, Fa’faffine, Whakawahine, Tangata ira Tane, Genderqueer. New Zealand  www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/faculty/adolescent-health-research-group/youth2000-national-youth-health-survey-series.html

Intersex Human Rights Australia. (2012). Including intersex in research studies and surveys. Retrieved from https://ihra/org.au/20042/ on-requests-for-research/

Kann, L., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Harris, V. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., . . . al, e. (2016). Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts and health-related behaviors among students in Grades 9-12 – United States and Selected Sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ.

Patterson, J. G., Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2017, April 1). Measuring sexual and gender minority populations in health surveillance. LGBT Health, 82-105.

UNESCO. (2015). From insult to inclusion: Asia-Pacific report on school bullying, violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Paris and Bangkok: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2016). Out in the open: Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO.

REFERENCE MADE TO UN AGENDA 2030 SDG 4.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/world-health-organization-removes-gender-dysphoria-from-list-of-mental-illnesses/

: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: From 2018. Further information: https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

. Age: 14-18 year olds (Grades 9-12). Sample size: Varies. Further information: http://cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs

: School-based survey. Country: Global. Population: Adolescents. Age: 13-17 year olds. Sample size: Unknown. Frequency: 2018. Further information:https://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/

BIOGRAPHY: INCLUDED:-

Australian Government. (2013). Guidelines on the recognition of sex and gender. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia.

Clark, T. F., T., B. P., Crengle, S., Denny, S., Dyson, B., Fortune, S., . . . Rossen, F. (2013). Youth’12 Prevalence Tables: The health and wellbeing of New Zealand secondary school students in 2012. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland

Intersex Human Rights Australia. (2012). Including intersex in research studies and surveys. Retrieved from https://ihra/org.au/20042/ on-requests-for-research/

Kann, L., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Harris, V. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., . . . al, e. (2016). Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts and health-related behaviors among students in Grades 9-12 – United States and Selected Sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ.

Patterson, J. G., Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2017, April 1). Measuring sexual and gender minority populations in health surveillance. LGBT Health, 82-105.

UNESCO. (2015). From insult to inclusion: Asia-Pacific report on school bullying, violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Paris and Bangkok: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2016). Out in the open: Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO.

REFERENCE MADE TO UN AGENDA 2030 SDG 4.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf

.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/world-health-organization-removes-gender-dysphoria-from-list-of-mental-illnesses/

29TH May 2019.. video World Health Assembly updated 25th May 2019 ICD-11 updated for 21st Century reflects critical advances in science and medicine. Is reframed as Gender Incongruence NOT Gender Identity Disorder as previous. Is described by a marked incongruence between an individuals experienced/ expressed gender and the assigned sex in pre-pubertal children.

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/Data/UNESCO.pdf 20 PAGES

NO internationally accepted definition of ‘indigenous’ people exists

THE UNITED NATIONS: According to the UN  rather than defining ‘Indigenous’ they would rather identify ‘Indigenous’. They base this on a number of Human Rights documents, the criterion of self-identification’

CENTRAL AUTHORITIES AND THEIR POWERS TO DETERMINE ‘INDIGENOUS’: For example those seeking Co-Governance and Partnerships. A Cultural Marxist Class System through the shaping of policies. Where one class of society is more privileged, have more recognition than the majority population 

THE DIVERSITY OF INDIGENOUS: Understanding the term “indigenous” Considering the diversity of indigenous peoples, an official definition of “indigenous” has not been adopted by any UN-system body. The system has developed a modern understanding of the term ‘Indigenous’ peoples, where there is a strong link to territories and natural resources, Cultural language and beliefs that form a minority population but a dominant group within society.

THE TERM ‘INDIGENOUS: In some countries preference may be made to tribes, first nations, ethnic groups, nomads etc., The term ;indigenous’ can be used for practical purposes and be interchangeable. ‘Indigenous’ is referred to in ‘sustainable knowledge’ and belief systems and refers to ‘natural resources’, a special relationship to the land. (A practice of management of natural resources). Identity Rights which Socialist Marxist authoritarian governments use so called ‘Indigenous’ peoples in a process of co-governance’. Institutionalized racism-Critical Race Theory, Identity Politics, A Two Tier Society. namely ‘Apartheid’. Only certain members of the so called ‘Indigenous group are favoured by the Authoritarian State (privileged member NOT ALL Iso called Indigenous)

Indigenous (adj.) Born in or originated in a place, native to a country, sprung from the land, literally ‘in born’ or born in a place. Old Latin-Indu-Within, in. Gignere is to ‘beget’, produce. Gene-to give birth, beget,

Gene– Offspring, child, person (Greek). Genus- Race, stock, kind, family, birth, descent. Genius- procreative divinity, inborn tutelary spirit, innate quality. Old Irish ‘rogenar’ – I was born. Welsh- to be born. Armenian ‘cnanim’ I bear, I am born.

‘En’  Indo- European root meaning ‘in’ existed from ‘interior;” Greek en “in,” eis “into,” endon “within;” Latin in “in, into,” intro “inward,” intra “inside, within;” Old Irish in, Welsh yn, Old Church Slavonic on-, Old English in “in, into,” inne “within, inside.”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/indigenous

https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/indigenous-peoples-and-minorities/Sami-people/midtspalte/What-Defines-an-Indigenous-People/id451320/    https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf