CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

THE MOST INFLUENTIAL ORGANIZER OF NET ZERO- SUSTAINABLE- SUSTAIBLE DEVELOPMENT- GLOBAL AGENDA 21- GLOBAL AGENDA 2030- WEF GREAT RESET

Over the many years I have been researching I have never heard any talking about Maurice Strong. He was very influential in the early formulations of UN Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and the 2020 Davos Great Reset. Goof friend of the Rockefeller family. Mentor and lifelong friend to Klaus Scwab. On the Founding Board of the WEF. Advisor to two Secretary Generals of the UN. Advisor to the President of the World Bank. Has been awarded many distinctions and Awards

Maurice Strong a billionaire oilman. One of the key propagators of the theory that ‘man made CO2 emissions from transportation, vehicles, coal plants and agriculture caused a dramatic & accelerating global temperature rise that threatens the Planet- the so called Global Warming (Climate Con)

As chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference, Strong promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to “save the environment.” Strong stated his radical ecologist agenda:- “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Strong was a curious choice to head a major UN initiative to mobilize action on the environment, as his career and his considerable fortune had been built on exploitation of oil, like an unusual number of the new advocates of ‘ecological purity,’ such as David Rockefeller or Robert O. Anderson of Aspen Institute or Shell’s John Loudon.

Strong had met David Rockefeller in 1947 as a young Canadian eighteen and from that point, his career became tied to the network of the Rockefeller family. Through his new friendship with David Rockefeller, Strong, at age 18, was given a key UN position under UN Treasurer, Noah Monod. The UN’s funds were conveniently enough handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank. This was typical of the model of “public-private partnership” to be deployed by Strong—private gain from public government.

In the 1960s Strong had become president of the huge Montreal energy conglomerate and oil company known as Power Corporation, then owned by the influential Paul Desmarais. Power Corporation was reportedly also used as a political slush fund to finance campaigns of select Canadian politicians such as Pierre Trudeau, father of Davos protégé Justin Trudeau, according to Canadian investigative researcher, Elaine Dewar. [ix]

Strong organized was a key player in the UN Earth Summit 1. And the UN Rio Summit, by b1971 Maurice Strong was named the Under-Secretary of the UN in New York and Secretary General of the upcoming Earth Day Conference (UN Conference on the Human Environment- Earth Summit) in Stockholm Sweden

Strong was also the Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation which financed the launching of the UN Stockholm Earth Day project. It was the Stockholm Earth Day Project that created the UN Environment Program (UNEP). Maurice Strong was the Head of this UNEP

1989 Maurice Strong was named by the UN Secretary General to head the 1992 UN Conference on Environment & Develop,emt or UNCED (Rio Earth Summit 11) Strong oversaw the drafting of the UN Sustainable Environmental Goals- UN Agenda 21 for Global Sustainable Development. Which is the basis of Klaus Schwabs ‘Great Reset’. And also the blueprint of UN AGENDA 2030 ‘Transforming Our World’ Core Principle being ‘Leave No-one Behind’

Sustainable Development forms the basis of the WEF Klaus Schwabs Great Reset, as well as the creation of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC (UN). Strong also arranged for Klaus Schwab to serve as a key advisor to the Rio Earth Summit

Maurice Strong also commissioned a report for the Club Of Rome. The First Global Revolution which was authored by Alexander King which actually admitted that the CO2 Global Warming claim was merely an invested ruse to force change “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

Tim Wirth was President Clintons delegate to the UN Rio Summit – he stated  “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Strong at the Rio Summit first introduced the manipulative idea  of “Sustainable Society’ and defined it in his goal in eliminating CO2 and other so called Greenhouse Gases. Agenda 21 then became Agenda 2030 in September 2015 in Rome, with the Popes blessing of the 17 sustainable global Development goals- Transforming Our World- Leaving No-one Behind’

Also declaring that “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlement, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market …Private land ownership also is a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice… Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only ‘be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”

In short private land ownership must become socialized for “society as a whole,” an idea well-known in Soviet Union days, and a key part of the Davos Great Reset. At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General Secretary, Strong declared:-                 “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable.”

Maurice Strong was at the very centre of the UNs Transformation Of Our World, the imposing of a Technocratic paradigm of stealth, using dire warnings of planet extinction and global warming which led to global boiling- Climate Crisis- Climate Emergency. With merging government agencies- corporate power in unelected control of pretty much everything

Agenda 2030(UN) Transforming Our Lives ‘Leave No-one Behind’ by passing the General Election Ballot Box. Maurice Strongs 1997 creation of the action plan following the UN Earth Summit ‘ The Global Diversity Assessment’ a blueprint for the roll out of the WEF Fourth Industrial Revolution. An inventory of every resource on the planet- how it will be controlled and how they would achieve this global revolution (Maurice Strong at this time was co chairman of the WEF Forum)

Maurice Strong died in October 2015. Klaus Schwab wrote about his good friend and Mentor: –.“He was my mentor since the creation of the Forum: a great friend; an indispensable advisor; and, for many years, a member of our Foundation Board

Strong left the UN due to the Oil For Food Scandal, although escaped any official accusations of wrong doing. He was a Member of the Club Of Rome Think Tank. Trustee of the Rockefeller and Rothchild Foundation. Also the Director of the ‘Temple Of Understanding of the ‘Lucifer Trust (aka Lucis Trust) housed at the Cathedral of St John the Divine in New York City “where pagan rituals include escorting sheep and cattle to the alter for blessing. Here, Vice President Al Gore delivered a sermon, as worshippers marched to the altar with bowls of compost and worms…”

Eeem yep the Luciferian Agenda among the Globalist elites. The dark Side of Schwabs Great Reset- You will own nothing and you will be happy…Yep this generation they really have very little hope of owning their own home.. The Global Agenda is very dark, dystopian and bloody evil.. and intends to elimination us of trillions of dollars…capture us in a digital imprisonment (confinement- control).

Filling the Gaps to accelerate Global Agenda 2030- Indigenous Iwi/Maori Radicals Peoples Report to the UN.. And Migration is embedded in 10 out of the 17 Global Goals of UN Agenda 2030. Through a Joint Official Agreement signed 13/6/2019 the WEF and UN agreed to advance the Global Development Goals across the World jointly (Corporate Captured)

EEM.. And The NZ Three Party Govt and right across all Political Parties have reaffirmed their commitment to embrace- support- promote and advance this Globalist Evil Agenda ‘ Transforming Our Lives’ Everyone Everywhere At Every Age. (Their Words Not Mine) BY PASSING THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT VOTING BOX.

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

 

 

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

MASS SURVEILLANCE AS PARLIAMENT INTRODUCED YET ANOTHER BILL TO EXPAND STATE POLICING POWERS OVER THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH…..Expanded new powers to Police Officers to ‘Move-On’ or Detain someone. Mark Mitchell tabled the Policing Amendment Bill in a 1st Reading to an almost empty Parliament. The enabling of authoritarian mechanisms for mass surveillance of the New Zealand public. (The Police Minister told the House)

Again we are about to drown in Orwellian 1984 a society of Mass Surveillance and the collection of personal data. Police having new expanded powers to record personal data and to use body cams on whoever they feel is justified to use them on, even if its not justifiable under the NZ Bill Of Rights. They call this ‘ restoring police powers’

Eeem over the last 8 years we have experience this restoring, the huge expansion of State Policing powers over many  people of New Zealand – the advancing of authoritarian police  Mid 2018 The Govts UN Global Compact Of Migration (Police visiting those that opposed this). Police cams pointed in our faces at Rally’s held in Aotea Square. Being shouted at by Police demanding I go home- not speak up. Police coming to my door warning me not to organize rally’s (protests) Don’t speak publicaly

Then the Mosque Attacks, where Innocent Citizens were targeted by Police. The Start of the intensity of Misinformation- Disinformation-Islamophobia- Cancel Culture- Again the Police at the door. Then came the Gun Buy Back.. Again State Policing of innocent citizens of NZ. Fire Arm Clubs- Farmers .. (And we still had Gun Crime and Knife attacks)

No Farmers – No Food Rallies- Again Police target law abiding Citizens. Then came C OVID Mandates-Restrictions- Threats-Indoctrination and Manipulation. With the Govt purchasing enough experimental jabs for the entire population of NZ. Medical Professionals – Nurses and Police either lose their jobs or refuse to be jabbed. We were bulldozed and many were brutalized. And massively lied to. Again the Authoritarian Totalitarian State Policing over Law Abiding Citizens Lives that had not committed a criminal offence pursay.

Now its more expanded Police Powers to stop anyone anytime  across the entire country of NZ- and to detain  individuals for roadside drug testing . This is not about Drug Impairment. This is absolutely against the NZ Bill Of Rights.

There can be many reason the test will come up positive and the individual will not be drug impaired. It can be prescription medication, some foods, mouth washes etc etc.  As a consequence the Police can immediately stop you from driving for 12 hrs. They do not have to have a reason to stop you. If you refuse then you face a heavy fine and a loss of Demerit Points.

As if we haven’t has enough of this. Again we are looking at higher inflation- fuel shortages- means higher prices not only at the pump but everywhere. More crime at this escalates. We have has 8 years of some sort of  authoritarian Policing or other. And still we have Islamophobia thrown at us. And discrimination if you have an opinion that doesn’t fit the one source of truth.

C0-governance still sits in our midst- race based politics- race based identity- race based services. A Race Based State Cultural Sovereignty, where Anti-westernization * Anti Christianity * Anti Juadism is rampant… under the mask of decolonization, and under the so called Social Justice Umbrella of what I call the Tyranny Of Human Rights.

Yes 8 years of continuous authoritarianism- are most people word out? Do may New Zealanders feel repressed- suppressed.. Again ready to vote for the ‘Best Of The Worst’. Isn’t that the way it goes.   ENOUGH IS ENOUGH… And Mark Mitch calls this ‘We Have To Narrow the Law’

WakeUpNZ

Cassie

...

NZs DIGITALIZED SYSTEM FOR ALL VEHICLES ‘ARE YOU ABOUT TO BE DIGITALLY FRISKED’?

NZ’s Digital Road User Charges (RUC) system for ALL light vehicles  End of 2026 beginning 2027. Abolishing Petrol Excise Duty. The RUC new system is based on ‘Distance’ and ‘Vehicle Weight’ requiring 1,000 km units, replacing Physical paper stickers with Digitalization- Electronic  System/ Legislative changes are already on their way. (RUC Light  vehicles under 3.5 tonnes)  This includes Electric (EVs) * Hybrid * Petrol * Diesel vehicles. Payment methods will be digital. With 3rd Party Electronic Providers whom will offer RUC (Road User Charges) Monitoring services. Drivers will have to pre-purchase distance (units of 1,000 kms) and must ensure their licence is current

Future State (Approx. 2027): Petrol tax is abolished. All vehicles pay RUC, with rates to be determined closer to the 2027 launch. With RUC bought online in the NZTA app or via Agents. Penalties driving with an expired licence can lead to assessments for unpaid RUC. The current and future transition involves a transition in stages. Early this year Diesel & Heavy Vehicles already pay RUC based on distance and weight. 1st April 2024 EVs and Plug in Hybrids began paying RUC.

The 2027 Transition (Universal RUC) All 3.5 million light vehicles included petrol driven cars will move to the RUC System. Once fully implemented, the fuel Excise Duty will be removed from the Petrol price. At this present half the price of petrol at the pump includes Govt Charges and Tax upon Tax. Including ETS – Carbon Emissions (The cost of Cardon on the International market depends on what that cost is at the pumps. At present approx. 17 cents per litre.

Third Party Provider- NZTA Waka Kotahi will shift being both regulator and retailer allowing for Private Third Party companies such as Argus Tracking or EROAD to participate in the automated RUC System. Also the Land Transport (Revenue) Amendment Bill addressing Traffic congestion via the Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Act 2025. With reforms that also leverage Digitalization to integrate distance based charging and congestion management into a single digital platform. (Congestion Charges have been renamed as ‘Time Of Use ‘ (TOU)charging for certain roads during peak periods. The legislation comes into force 18th November 2026. Auckland is expected to be the first city to implement this scheme

Estimated costs for Auckland TOU suggests peak time charges ranging from $3.50 to $5.oo per entry. TOU charges, tolls and RUC being bundled in together with one digital invoice. The Govt has reported that the Road User Charges Act 2012 already contains protection that limit the RUC collectors access to location data. All RUC Provider must prove their electronic systems are secure and reliable to the NZTA to gain approval.

RUC and TOU charges mean that travel data will be stored by 3rd Party Provider, often using AWS (Amazon)  or Microsoft Azure these are subject to the US CLOUD Act. Therefore there is conflict as US Federal Law Enforcement  can compel US based technology companies to provide data stored on their servers regardless if the data is located in the US or NZ. For example>- If an RUC Provider is owned by a US company (Eg Microsoft or Amazon) the US Govt can request access without going through  NZ Courts (This is a bone of contention with the NZ Privacy Act).For the average commuter the primary risk is Metadata.  The aggregate of mass personal data stored in the US Cloud technically falls under their investigative reach. For light vehicles  Road

User Charges (RUC) per 1,000 Km will be $912 per year based on $76 per 1,000 km.  *TOU (Congestion Charge: Potentially $1,400 plus per year for a daily peak hour commuter. A driver entering a zone twice daily (to/from work) could pay $7–$10 per day, totaling roughly  1,600–$2,300 annually for a 230-day work year. Beyond these Road User Fee’s, motorist must meet ‘Transaction Costs’.  This will be approximately $13. 75 per person for RUC purchase. Or if you buy RUC in 1,000 units this adds roughly $150 per year in fees.

Older vehicles without built in tracking ‘smart tags’ or electronic distance recorders (eRUC) may be required to purchase this also. Annual Licensing (Rego) fees will be approx.., $172- to $350 per year depending on vehicle type. But what are the risks involved when third party provider collect Metadata about your data- this poses several risks. They are Pattern Recognition & Life Maps * Function Creep * Third Party Vulnerability  * Insurance & Commercial Misuse.

Pattern Recognition & Life Maps. Aggregated Metadata can reveal a drivers daily habits, workplace, home location, social association * Function Creep is where data collected for revenue purpose could be accessed by Law enforcement (Eg Police- Spy Agencies for Mass Surveillance.   *Third Party Vulnerability is where Data is stored by Private RUC provider susceptible to cyberattacks. If these companies are US owned the US CLOUD Act can grant foreign agencies access to NZ Driver metadata stored on their servers  * Insurance & Commercial Misuse is where Metadata such as ‘heavy braking ‘ or ‘high speed cornering’ could eventually be shared with or sold to insurance companies to adjust premiums without the drivers explicit consent.

Also Privacy Creep concerns where modern automated number plate recognition (ANRP0 and TOU camera’s are no longer just reading flat text, the hardware in these systems has evolved into high definition surveillance. They do not just see the number plate they can catch high resolution images of the driver and passengers in the vehicle. AI can be trained to identify faces, whether the driver is wearing a seatbelt, or is using a phone

Whilst NZ Govt states the primary goals is revenue and compliance, the raw data contains biometric features that facial recognition software can process instantly to other databases. The real danger is not just a photo, it’s the linking of data. Your number plate links to your registration which links to your name & address which via the RUC/ToU Provider links to your credit card and GPS/Time Logs.

Thus passive surveillance. Its like being digitally frisked everytime you pass a camera creating a permanent searchable record of who you were with, where you are going, where you have been and where you have visited linking this to workmates, family, friends etc.,  Yet NZ Privacy Act 2020 and the NZTA’s internal rules are suppose to limit this, however under the Search & Surveillance Act, NZ Police can (and do) request access to ANPR data from councils or NZTA for investigative purposes.

If this imagery is stored in the Cloud, it falls back into US CLOUD Act trap, where a foreign agency could potentially access high resolution images of NZrs inside their private vehicles without a local warrant . This is the cost that NZrs pay the surveillance – monitoring of motorists. A portion of the RUS/ToU fees goes towards maintain 1,000s of camera’s and the AI Software used to monitor you * Compliance odometer check. There will be higher admin fess to nudge nudge  you towards digital surveillance. Once this digitalized system is up and running it will be too difficult to get out of… (Eeem Lost in the Cloud, so to speak)

Should we distrust these Digital Systems? (Absolutely) There has been past data incidents  – revisiting COVID 19 Response that revealed multiple agencies including Health NZ and Stats NS that could not fully guarantee third party provider as to meeting agreed privacy protections. The Transport Sector reinforcing concerns about the transition to a Universal Digital Road User Charges (RUC) and (TOU). Privacy  Breaches in Transport despite assurance  NZ Transport databased have experienced significant unauthorized access.

May 2024 Portal Breach (NZTA) confirmed that roughly 1500 motorists had their driver licence or motor reg details illegally accessed via a third party portal  * 2025 Motorcheck incident. Where names and addresses of approx. 951 people were improperly accessed over 12 months. This led to at least 13 vehicles being targeted for theft after their owners home details were exposed

18th November 2026 TOU charging has been criticized for ‘loose’ privacy protections. * Police & Spy Agencies being able to access ANPR footage recorded for Road Charging effectively turning a Revenue Tool into a Mass Surveillance Instrument. (Warning by the Council for Civil Liberties)  *Biometric Data expose- where high resolution camera’s required for TOU enforcement can inadvertently capture  biometric information of drivers & passengers, which may be stored for months or shared by agencies

Database Linking- where the Privacy Commissioner has warned that linking location data with the Motor Vehicle Registry can reveal sensitive ‘Life Maps’ of a persons habits. (Office of the Privacy Commissioner). When the Government tells the consumer their personal data and that of their families, friends, work colleagues is safe- Eeem Do you Really Trust Them.??

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

...

THE OFFICIAL FRAMEWORK OF AGENDA 2030 SDG 5 ACHIEVE GENDER IDENTITY ‘TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD ‘LEAVE NO-ONE BEHIND’

THE OFFICIAL FRAMEWORK OF AGENDA 2030 SDG 5 ACHIEVE GENDER IDENTITY ‘TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD ‘LEAVE NO-ONE BEHIND’

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the United Nations in 2015, primarily frames gender through Sustainable Development  (SDG 5): “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls”. (Welcome to the United Nations)

The Focus of the Official Text of Agenda 2030 and its Targets (e.g., ending child marriage, FGM, and ensuring economic rights) are specifically aimed at biological females. The terminology within the documents uses the terms  “women and girls” and “men and boys,” without explicit mention of “gender identity” or “sexual orientation” in the original goals or indicators. (Stockholm Environment Institute)

While the original text is binary, many UN agencies and international bodies have increasingly interpreted the pledge to “Leave No One Behind” (LNOB) as including LGBTQI+ individual (The Shift towards Inclusive ‘Gender Identity)

Groups like UN Women argue that gender equality cannot be achieved without promoting the human rights of people with “diverse sexual orientations and gender identities” (SOGIESC). Strategic Plans include recent  frameworks, such as the UN Women Strategic Plan 2022–2025, have begun including explicit references to gender identity that were absent in the 2015 text

The European Commission has adopted an “LGBTIQ Equality Strategy” through 2030, aligning its regional implementation of the SDGs with protections for gender identity and expression. The move to incorporate “gender identity” into the 2030 Agenda has met with significant pushback from various Member States and civil society groups however they are still supporting the Global Agenda

Pushing “gender ideology” through the UN system overrides the sovereignty of Member States and uses international development goals to enforce specific social values. Certain feminist perspectives suggest that shifting focus away from biological women toward a broader “gender identity” lens may dilute the specific progress needed for women’s rights, such as land ownership and reproductive health

Submission To Sogi ohchry.org  “Submission to the report on gender, sexual orientation and gender identity” We fundamentally disagree with the radical unscientific transgender ideologies underpinning your thematic report on Gender, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. We believe the very questions and definitions used to illustrate a gross overstepping of your mandate. The UN Social Policies with regard to Gender Equality were specifically designed to protect Sex Based Rights, not controversial transgender ideology. (subm-gender-theory-ind-plesso-luigi-rossi.pdf)

The terms ‘gender’ & ‘gender equality’ are common terms used throughout the UN System and in multiple UN documents and resolutions adopted by consensus by UN Member States to advance the equality of women and girls and were never intended to advance this highly controversial transgender polies.

The American College of Pediatricians calls ‘Gender Dysphoria’ a mental disorder in which an individual experiences distress over a deeply felt desire or belied that he or she is the opposite sex. When the dysphoria is severe enough to cause a child to assist on amputating their sex organs, without question, this should be considered a mental disorder.

Among the many facts which make it impossible to support ‘gender identity’ policies is the fact that where gender confusion affirming policies are adopted, they can serve to encourage cross sex hormone therapies and surgeries, we know such interventions cause harm. What these children really need is help in overcoming their disorder, not policies to protect their confused gender identity or identities, or that push them further and further into an opposite sex identity, putting them at risk for a large array of mental, social and physical problems throughout their lives

The Independent Expert on SOGI is seeking to implement so called ‘Comprehensive Sexuality Education ‘ (CSE) designed to indoctrinate children and mainstream ‘queer theory’ an unhealthy belief system that encourages children to disassociate from their biological sex in harmful ways. It should be noted that comprehensive sexuality education and sexual orientation and gender identity were specifically rejected from the 2030 Agenda by many UN Member States and that the establishment of SOGI experts mandate is a deliberate attempt to override the positions of States opposed to such and to coerce them into accepting SOGI rights.

This is a direct assault on the Sovereignty of UN Member Nation States and an abuse of the UN System. We denounce the Independent Expert on SOGIs most recent call to identify political and religious leaders worldwide who speak out publicaly against harmful and unscientific gender ideology

WakeUpNZ  RESEARCHER: Cassie

LINK (https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/sexualorientation/cfi-gender-report/subm-gender-theory-ind-plesso-luigi-rossi.pdf#:~:text=establishment%20of%20this%20SOGI%20expert’s%20mandate%20is,publicly%20against%20harmful%20and%20unscientific%20%E2%80%9Cgender%20ideology.%E2%80%9D)

(ie-sogi@ohchry.org  – registry@ohchr.org)

...