TABLE TOP EXERCISES THAT INFLUENCE INTERNATIONAL POLICY MAKING ‘EVENT 201’ WEF & GATES FOUNDATION

TABLE TOP EXERCISES ARE DESCRIBED AS A NORMAL TOOL OF PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION & RESPONSE.. Several have already been acted out for International purposes at the  John Hopkins Centre For Health Bloomberg Public Health Center. Partners of the Center include :- Independent research & analysists. Supported by governments worldwide, foundations- funders and partners  etc., To name a few:- Open Society Foundations (George Soros) * World Health Org., (UN) WHO *Bell & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation* CEC * FDA and many more. The John Hopkins Centre was founded in 1998 by D A Henderson as a first Global-Govt Organization

JOHN HOPKINS – BLOOMBERG SCHOOLS OF PUBLIC HEALTH- CENTER FOR HEALTH SECURITY FUNDERS AND PARTNERS INCLUDE.. The Center conducts independent research and analysis, and our work is supported by government, foundations, and gifts. We are grateful for the generous support from our funders and partners. To study the vulnerability of US Civilian population to Biological Weapons. 25 plus years on the John Hopkins Health Security Bloomberg School’ s focus in ‘Severe Pandemics that threaten Our World

George Soros- Open Society Foundations *WHO *John Hopkins  * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation *Robert Wood Johnson Foundation U ASPR (Assistat Secretary for Prepared and Response *CDC *Homeland Security *FDA *DTRA *Alfred Sloan Foundation * de Beaument Foundation * Smith Richardson The Center was founded in 1998 by D.A. Henderson as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent, prepare, and respond to their consequences.

Between 1992- 2002 Published papers in Jama Medical Management of Biological Agents  *1999- 2000 Organized 2 National Symposia on Medical Health Response & Bio-terrorism *2001 was highly influential in government decisions to purchase a UN national Smallpox stockpile *2002 Became involved in the Guidance for Hospital and Communities in the US on Pandemic Preparedness Hospital Programmes *2003 Led & shaped US National efforts to engage the public in epidemic & disaster response policies & programs. Launched their 1st Peer Reviewed Journal in this field. Consequently Bioterrorism & Biosecurity was later renamed Health Security. In 2004 John Hopkins Health Security Centre’s research provoked US Policy of ‘Dual Use Research’. Startups publishing annual Health Security  federal funded articles. Which were used by the Media *Government to understand Bio-defense & Health Security

2006 John Hopkins Centre’s analysis * advocacy helped to form the ‘Pandemic & All-Hazards Preparedness Act and the Bio-medical Advanced Research & Development Authority (BARDA) *2011 John Hopkins Centre published its first ‘Nuclear Preparedness Guidance’ aimed at Public Health, medical and Civic Leader in the Rad Resilient City Initiative

2006 The John Hopkins Center analysis and advocacy helped to inform the framework for the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act, as well as the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

2011 Published first nuclear preparedness guidance aimed at public health, medical, and civic leaders in the Rad Resilient City initiative. The initiative providing cities & their neighbors with a checklist of ‘preparedness actions’ following a nuclear detonation. Also provided leaders a Checklist of Preparedness’ as to the risk of terrorism

2012 John Hopkins created their first International Fellowship Program focused on building Bio-security leadership.. And a first effort report on how to allocate resources during a Pandemic. * In 2013 they helped lead-develop the US National Health Security Preparedness Index. (The first State to State Index on Health Preparedness)

2013-2014: John Hopkins Centre participated in debate referring to ‘Gain Of Function’-Potential Pathogen Research. This resulted in US Govt funding and a new US Policy *2014-2016 Established Track 2 – S E Asian-US & India -US Biosecurity dialogues * 2017 Published their first working paper in the field of ‘defining global catastrophic biological risks- catalyzing a new focus on these issues *John Hopkins Health Centre- Bloomberg School of Health Security are also well known worldwide for their famous ‘Table Top- Simulation Exercises. (1) 2001 ‘Dark Winter Exercise- Depicting a smallpox attack on the US- which led the US Govt to stockpile Smallpox Vaccines

The 2005 ‘Atlantic Storm’ Table-top simulation Exercise focusing on the Inter-dependence that is demonstrated among International Communities in the face of Epidemics & Biological Weapons. * Another John Hopkins Centre Exercise namely ‘CLADEX’ in 2018. Was a major table-top exercise on major political and policy decision making that would emerge if a global catastrophic biological event was to occur.

The one I find most interesting is John Hopkins Bloomberg Centre For Health Security – namely EVENT 201’ which took place on October 18th 2019. Only e months before the emergence of the COVID19 Pandemic. Of course Fact Checkers- and the usual participants- NGO’s- Govts etc., have said “Nothing to See Here- Its nothing to do with the emergence of the COVID 19 Pandemic”

The 18th October 2019 ‘201’ Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was held at the Pierre Hotel in New York. The audience was by invite only (A livestream audience) Which has Video coverage on You Tube which can be viewed. The Tabletop exercise for the Global Pandemic was organized by the John Hopkins Center For Health Security, the World Economic Forum and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Funded by the ‘Open Philanthropy Project’

The Players (Actors) that participated in the Event 201 Table Top Exercise were individuals from Global Businesses, Govt & Public Health and involved Sofia Borges UN Foundation Senior Director at the New York Head Office of the UN * Dr Chris Elias -President of the Global Development Programme of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Dr Chris Elias serves as the President and CEO of PATH, an International non-profit organization and various other Advisory Boards including the Advisory Committee to the Director of the CDC & the Washington Global Health External Advisory Board. Also a Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Other participating actors of the ‘Global Pandemic Table-Top Exercise Event’ include Timothy Evans (McGill University. Associate Dean of the School Of Population and Global Health in the Faculty of Medicine & Associate Vice Principle of the Global Policy and Innovation. Has a important role at the World Bank Group (The Nutrition, Health Population Global Practice)

Timothy Evans joined McGill University in September 2019 as the Inaugural Director and Associate Dean of the School of Population and Global Health (SPGH) in the Faculty of Medicine and Associate Vice-Principal (Global Policy and Innovation). He joined McGill after a 6-year tenure as the Senior Director of the Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice at the World Bank Group.

A Representative of WHO (World Health Org, UN). Dr Evans who was Assistant Director General of WHO from 2003-2010. He is at the forefront for the last 20 years advancing Global Health Equity & Global Health Systems. Leading the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Also over-seeing the production of the annual World Health Report (UN) A Co-Founder of many partnerships, including the Global Alliance on Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI). He led the China CDC Team from September to November 2013 in the fights against Ebola

Participants of the Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 included Representatives of the UN in various Global Initiatives* Representative from Vodafone Foundation *ANZ Bank *Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Representative  *WEF Representation *Global Business Advisory Leader * Lufthansa Group Airlines * UPS Foundation *A major Media Company* A member of the Monetary Authority of Singapore *Global Health Johnson & Johnson

The Global Pandemic Exercise concluded with Recommendation including a Call of Action for Public-Private Partnerships for a Global Pandemic Preparedness Response. The John Hopkins Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was played out like it was in reality the pending Global Pandemic with all the mandatory Restrictions. Involved Radio and TV Broadcasting. Mis-Disinformation Campaigns.

Economic and societal impacts- social consequences- suffering. Unpresented levels of collaboration between govts, international organizations and the Private Sector. Lockdowns, social distancing. The challenges posed by the populations. A new robust form of public-private cooperation to address the pandemic. Proposals were made by WEF * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation * John Hopkins Centre for Health Security

This included Govts international organizations, business, have essential corporate capabilities to be utilized on a very large scale during the Pandemic. Stating public sectors will be over-whelmed. Economic losses. Social Media, communications systems, global news media needed to enable govts emergency response. Operational partnerships between govt responses

WHO currently had a influenza vaccine stockpile with contracts to pharmaceutical companies that they agreed to supply during a global Pandemic. WHOs ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need. WHO R& D Blueprint Pathogens to be deployed in clinical trials during outbreaks in collaborations with CEPT, GAVI and WHO with Bi- or multinational agreements

* Cancelling of travel by Air & by Sea. International Aviation and Shipping *Border measures. Leading to unjustified border measures. Fear & uncertainty. Severely affecting Employment, businesses.. global supplies of products etc., Vaccine deaths are absent.

November 19th 2019 WEF article on managing Risk & Impact of Guture Pandemics. Also a Private Sector Roundtable- A Global Agenda 19th November 2011. 12th May 2019 WEF Peter Sands. Outbreak – Readiness and Business Impact. Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global economy.( WEF)

Also includes references to – The Center’s scholars researched these topics to inform the scenario.CAPS: The Pathogen and Clinical Syndrome (PDF) *Communication in a pandemic (PDF) *Event 201 Model (PDF) *Finance in a pandemic (PDF) *Medical countermeasures (PDF)

All reported as a fictional unplanned Global COVID 19 Pandemic outbreak but it was played out as if in reality 18th October 2019 prior to COVID19 global emergence. Also recommended was the SPARS Pandemic 2015-2028 Table-top exercise at the John Hopkins Centre For Health and Security (October 2017) A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators

Recommended Citation Schoch-Spana M, Brunson EK, Shearer MP, Ravi S, Sell TK, Chandler H, Gronvall GK. The SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; October 2017.

This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional

LINK TO THE ‘ECHO CHAMBER’ SPARS PANDEMIC 2025- 2028 (https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf)

https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise

OTHER LINKS OF INTEREST: 1 Global Health Security: Epidemics Readiness Accelerator. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/projects/managing-the-risk-and-impact-of-future-epidemics. Accessed 11/19/19

2 Private Sector Roundtable. Global health Security Agenda. https://ghsagenda.org/home/joining-the-ghsa/psrt/. Accessed 11/19/19

3 Peter Sands. Outbreak readiness and business impact: protecting lives and livelihoods across the global economy. World Economic Forum 2019. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/outbreak-readiness-and-business-impact-protecting-lives-and-livelihoods-across-the-global-economy. Accessed 12/5/19

https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response/

https://www.cni.org/topics/special-collections/event-201-why-werent-we-paying-attention

https://science.feedback.org/review/simulation-exercises-such-as-catastrophic-contagion-normal-part-pandemic-preparedness-dont-predict-future-pandemics/

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

...

Other Blog Posts

DOES A DEATH CULT EXIST UNDER THE VEIL OF COVID19?

In November The Defender wrote to the New Zealand Ministry of Health (MOH) to ask some important questions about the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide in New Zealand.

In light of the serious deficiencies in the End of Life Choice Act (EOLCA), and concerns that have been raised by healthcare professionals, we felt it was crucial to put some urgent questions to the MOH.

In our Official Information Act (OIA) request we asked the following question:
“Could a patient who is severely hospitalised with Covid-19 potential
ly be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Act if a health practitioner viewed their prognosis as less than 6 months?”
There were several reasons why The Defender wanted to seek clarity from the MOH about this issue. One of those being the vague interpretation of what determines , qualifies as a ‘terminal illness’

Firstly, New Zealand is currently described as being in a precarious position when it comes to COVID-19 and hospital resources. In light of this, it would not be hard to envisage a situation in which a speedy and sizeable rise in COVID-19 hospitalisations could result in pressure to utilise euthanasia and assisted suicide as tools to resolve such a serious crisis.

Overseas commentators have raised the prospect of these kind of unethical motivations since early in this pandemic.

The Defender News Media have created a petition to Parliament calling to have David Seymour’s Euthanasia Act to be amended urgently (End Of Life Choice)
Ever since Seymour’s Bill (End Of Life Choice) was introduced to parliament I have had serious concerns about the dangerous concepts that exist within it. I view the word ‘Choice’ used within the title of the Act as being a psychological drawcard. Everyone’s loves a choice.

When members of Parliament voted as to this euthanasia Bill last year, under the veil of COVID19 it was not a party political vote, it was an individual vote. One of heart, emotions etc., I believe the facts as to the serious risks that could eventuate were not taken into consideration. And how many people would unnecessarily seek to prematurely end their lives due to serious circumstances that no health professional could ever know about. That no political act could regulate.

In my rumble video I explain in greater depth what I deem to be the dangerous concepts of Seymour’s Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide Act that became law last month (November 2021).

I also express my concern as to whether we the citizens of New Zealand under residing under an institutionalized state death cult, that has been introduced under the veil of COVID19.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE ARROW WITHIN THE IMAGE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO WHERE I AIR MY SERIOUS CONCERNS AND THAT OF OTHERS.

IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED UP TO MY WEBSITE YET PLEASE DO SO NOW, THANK YOU.

...

WHEN ‘NUDGE’ COMES TO SHOVE PUSH RIGHT BACK

Behavioural Science Aotearoa (BSA)  is actually a ‘Nudge Unit’.  ‘Nudge Units’ are used worldwide to subtly and sometimes in your face of  enabling desired outcomes for political policy making, regulations, laws.  Understanding peoples behaviour through using AI digital Re-Imaginings .
The NZ Government calls this giving small tweaks to seek the desired income from the citizens of New Zealand. Measuring effects of messages on behaviour outcomes

Like some authoritarian Iwi that collaborate with Ardern they  ‘Nudge’  Maori into not taking part in protests by referring to ‘Get your Mana back’.  In other words they are indiscreetly,  in a subtle way saying you have lost your Mana by opposing the governments restrictions, taking part in protests  “you lose your mana”  Which equates to ‘Nudge’, nudge don’t take part in protests and you will get your Mana back”   This is just one example being used. (Nudge Theory)

Another, in the Grey Power Newspaper “Grandparents be good role models for your grandchildren, get the shot in the arm show”  More ‘Nudging’ so that more New Zealanders are guineapig participants”

The United Nation Environmental Programme authored a book entitled ‘The little Book of Green Nudges’, a quick guide to reducing environmental impacts on campuses worldwide..  An Environmental Nudge refers to promoting desired behaviours through subtle changes in choice environment. These are passive and active.  This is all about behavioural modification, re-engineering of behaviour through a cognitive process, how to change human actions.

‘Nudging’ farmers to comply with water restrictions. Nudging techniques to promote Zero Carbons by 2030. As governments worldwide take part in ‘Behavioural Conferences.  Making a difference ‘Nudging for Policy Change’, introducing Digital Toolkits and Frameworks.  Mainstreaming behavioural Insights across Governments worldwide.

Behavioural Science used in Public Policy making, promoting the re-engineering of individual, groups behaviour. Gearing up the ‘Nudge Units’ to introduce stricter regulations to achieve their Zero Carbons . Behaviour change is a core component to achieving more inclusive and sustainable outcomes

The Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), also known unofficially as the “Nudge Unit“, … BIT has an office in Sydney, Australia, and in Wellington, New Zealand.

David Halpern is Chief Executive of the Behavioural Insights Team. … In 2015, David wrote a book about the team: “Inside the Nudge Unit:.  2021 ‘ The Behavioural Insights Team, The Nudge Unit. … this work have just been published in the New Zealand Medical Journal. Science is shaping how you behave

The ‘Nudge Thoery’ is a concept in behavioural economics, political theory, and behavioral sciences that promotes, acts upon  indirect suggestions as ways to influence the behaviour and decision-making of groups or individuals.

Ardern has over-extended her controls using the ‘Nudge Theory’.

‘Nudging’ can even over-ride peoples values, and be very unethical, violates civil liberties, human rights.

Nudge theory describes how indirect suggestions and positive reinforcement can influence decision-making. We used nudge theory to implement a trafficlight system.

2018 NHS England rolled out ‘Nudge Theory’, a digital traffic light system to decrease hospital visits during the winter months.

Businesses in New Zealand have been ‘Nudged’ by Ardern to continue the use of the Traffic Light System by still mandating staff and customers even though government mandates are suspended, until needed for the next variant that lands on New Zealand’s shores.

The Global Shapers, puppets of Klaus Schwab are in most countries of the world, there are  thousands of them. The Global Shapers are ‘Nudging’ the world to eat less meat’, by encouraging restuarants to change their menu’s, to push plan based meat-fake meat onto their customers.

The ‘Fast Food Company’ state they may well be ‘Nudged’ towards more plant based options- fake meat. The simple theory of behavioural economics could convince humans to eat less meat .

Ardern is ‘Nudging the citizens of New Zealand aiming for Zero Carbons 2030.

When being ‘Nudged’ give a shove and push back ‘get rid of the traffic light system’  Learn to recognize the ‘Nudges’. The solution involves.. When you realize you are being ‘Nudged” … Shove and  Push back.

 

PLEASE GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE, CLICK ON THE ARROW WITHIN THE IMAGE WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO MY VIDEO  WITH FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT.

 

NOTE: PLEASE SIGN UP ON WAKEUP NZ WEBSITE IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO ALREADY.  Thank you – Carol Sakey

 

...

UN & UN MEMBER NATION LEADERS PROMOTE FEMALES, MALES NO LONGER EXIST

THE UN AND GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE INTENSIFYING AND EXPANDING THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SPEECHES AND ON NEWSMEDIA AS TO THE  DEMOSTIC VIOLENCE BY MEN AGAINST WOMEN.

One school in NZ gave girls self defence classes and boys anger management. The message males are the abuses and females must defend themselves against males. All men are abuses.

The UN is all about support, education, caring, respecting Girls and Women. It appears that men have been rubbed on the chalked blackboard like they no longer exist, only as predators.

Whether its males abuse females more that females abuse males this does not equate putting all men under the one label of being predators, abusers of women. Domestic Violence does happen against men and its not unfamiliar but is familiar as not being publicised or reported in the mainstream media, the propaganda machine.

What is domestic violence against men? Its when some uses violence, controlling techniques to gain power over a male or female. Yes it happens to males. Eg a wife, partner abuses their male partner, husband

Men and women applies to both, the same scenario. Whether a same sex relationship or not, or any culture or religious group. Abuse relationships can happen between parents and children, grown children abusing parents, elder abuse, brother and sisters abusing each other

There are many different types of domestic violence, including physical assault, punching, slapping, hitting, scratching, bullying, emotional and psychological abuse including yelling, put downs, being ignored.

This may include social isolation, not being able to see family, friends, loved ones. And domineering behaviour- behaviour that frightens, harms, controls a person – man, women a child.

What are the signs that you may be experiencing domestic violence?

There are many different types of domestic violence, including:

Domestic Violence is mostly always discussed in relation to women. Man always regarded a s the perpetrator. Domestic Abuse is not limited to women alone. Men are most definitely abused verbally, physically, emotionally, psychologically, sexually. Men are what I call the ‘Silent Victims’. The law favours women as victims of violence, this is unjustly and is biased and discriminating.

Referencing:-January 2019 a Joint Submission for Men in NZ for the Universal Periodic Review of NZ (UPR Working Groups 32nd Session) Supporting Org., Canterbury Mens Centre, The Male Room, Wake Up NZ, Black Ribbon NZ, Mens and Boys Human Rights NZ. This important submission included:-That NZ has committed to full equality between men and women, however in some area’s men are disadvantages, men’s human rights are not protected  Men lack equality before the Law. Men face de facto inequalities compared to women.

Men are disadvantages by substantive differences in the justice system, in education, health, support for victims of violence and in family issues. There are system issues preventing NZ from addressing these human rights issues. Formal mechanisms to ensure gender equality, there is overwhelming evidence that concentrates on women’s inequalities. Ignoring the serious plight of men

NZ has at least three laws which explicitly discriminate against men and boys.  That violates the basic human rights of equality under the law and freedom from discrimination. “ensuring formal equality requires eliminating all instances of de jure discrimination”

In 1996 Female Genital mutilation became illegal in NZ however there is no protection for males.. While discussing intersex children, the committee on the Rights of the Child recommended “that no-one is subjected to unnecessary medical or surgical treatment during infancy or childhood”

Thus guaranteeing the Rights Of Children to bodily Integrity – autonomy and self-determination. Thus this should apply to all boys and girls.  NZ has accepted recommendations to remedy structural discrimination in the Justice System, however men face unequal treatment in the Justice System. Women who enter the Justice System are filtered out at every natural attrition point more than men.

Dr Samantha Jeffries found several disparities in the treatment of men compared to women  “In all but one case (the initial decision to imprison) -sex was found to have a direct impact on the judicial outcomes investigated including:- Length of prison tern, remand status, length of custodial, remand and bail conditions. Women’s imprisonment terms were found to be substantially shorter than men’s.  She also stated that she found judges and probation offices were more likely to talk about women in terms of their ‘superior’ nurturing capabilities, as weak willed, dependent on ‘bad’ men who had lead them astray, as mentally ‘unwell’ and /or as victims of  circumstance.

That the court was more likely to construed male offenders as bad, disruptive and dangerous.  This allowed the court to rationalise rehab over punishment for women.

There were other biases and discriminations by the justice system against men made in this report and no effort has been made to address, adjust these. Therefore NZ Judicial System, the Government should eliminate gender biases against men, males in general within the justice system.

NZ accepted recommendations to reduce inequalities in the education system however boys and men are behind at all levels of education. Dropping out, suspensions and expulsions:- Equal numbers of men and women reported being a victim of violent crime. Men reported less victimisation than women from family and partners and more from non-family members and strangers

4.The rate of death from assault for men is 1.6 times that of women

Men are unequally treated when it comes to services available to them purely because of their gender. Whether females or males are perpetrated both should be given the same relevant support. One police officer is reported as saying “I’m also seeing and I agree … that males are becoming expendable and it’s as if we don’t matter anymore.”

Much work needs to be done when it comes to health equalities, as NZ Health Strategy does not inclusively include men”( ‘gendered’ health strategy in New Zealand is not inclusive of men.” Traditionally men have a higher Mortality rate than women.  Many more men, young males suicide than females in NZ.

We have a horrific suicide history and its getting worse. Men suicide rate is three times higher than that of females. Men and fathers are very important members of families.

There is little to no recognition of mens reproduction rights, this is complicated because men do not bear the children but they should not be excluded without the male, father of the child’s sperm their would be no child in the first place.

Yes men become overjoyed, elated, look forward to the birth of their child, imagine if the unborn child’s mother then decides to terminate this unborn child that the father has already fallen in love with, is looking forward to holding in his arms, to show his little one of to the world his family. But that can be ripped away from him just like that, by a mother of his child deciding she doesn’t want the unborn baby right up to the time the unborn baby is in the mother birth canal.

Big Boys do cry, and they do hurt and they do suffer from family violence and they are discriminated against and treated unjustifiably discriminated against.

NZ Family Court System has significant problems. 21st September 2017 Zdenek Hanzlik died of injuries outside parliament. He was protesting issues with the family court,  He died of self immolation. Sacrificed himself by fire, set himself alight, burned to death

Another system that needs to be held totally responsible and accountable is Oranga Tamariki’s UPLIFTS’ and the systems that permit them. Report dated 23rd August 2019. The Equal Justice Project. Referring to a Newsroom report of ‘stolen generations’ Where thousands of children have been taken or lost “were stolen” Investigations into abuse in state care in 2019 found that more than 220 children were being harmed in 2018. 36 were sexually harmed, 182 physically harmed, 35 neglected and 83 emotionally abused by caregivers, family members, other Oranga Tamariki staff. When asked about these findings in March 2019 the ministry’s chief executive Grainne Moss failed to provide more detail about the number of Oranga Tamariki staff involved.

Figures obtained under the Official Information’s Act showed that in July – Sept 2018 there were three instances where Oranga Tamariki Staff were found to have physically harmed a child in care. There were three instances of physical harm in Oct-Dec quarter. In addition there was one instance of emotional harm and another instance of sexual harm caused by an Oranga Tamariki staff member, Oranga Tamariki refused to release details in its OIA response about what action was taken, if any, against staff members.

References to Oranga Tamariki namely ‘engenders a legacy of harm’ removal of children from their parents. Psychologically devastating.

The Guardian reportd 27th July 2019. An additional 18,000 children pushed into poverty In just one year) A study shows homelessness, food insecurity down to government neglect. Many children still living in damp conditions, more children than ever living in motels, families living in unaffordable homes. Public housing waiting list booms.

Ardern publicly declares “it would be difficult to find a government from the past several decades that had dome more to address child poverty than the current one. Ardern’s self praise. She says she is really prod of her government.  Government policies that failed to ensure adequate income support for hundreds of thousands of children.

The government doled out $13bn in wage subsidies to people whose jobs were affected by the lockdown and ongoing disruptions, but many people in lower-socioeconomic positions missed out, report author and Public Health Association chief executive, Leah Bain, said.

The complete failure of this government. Kiwi Build complete failure. Now the govt publicises, boasts all these houses are being built. High density housing, dog kennels without gardens.  Wait for it Red Traffic Light confined to your dog kennels of high density pack and stacks. Under constant surveillance.

Yep, that will really push family violence, anxiety, stress limits housed in little boxes with little or no gardens for children and no pets to cuddle.

Public Housing Waiting List 26,868 applicants as at March 31st 2022. An increase of 13.4% increase from the same time as last year. Now the NZ Govt invites 165,000 new residency visa’s by July 2022, even though there is a huge loss of employment and businesses that have seriously impacted on New Zealanders lives. The insanity persists.

NOTE PLEASE GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE CLICK ON THE ARROW TO MY VIDEO

 

 

...