The Green Agenda. New Zealand the Biggest Climate Crims In the World. Central – Local Government have Budget Restraints ‘ Electric buses, electric Ferries . Wind Turbines  if its too windy they stop, if its not windy enough they stop. Like Solar Farms use a lot of valuable land that  should be used for livestock and crops. The road to Degrowth is the road to ‘Climategate’, the Green Agenda.  NZ Three Party Solution to fulfill their obligations to Net Zero is to use ‘Carbon Credits’ – ‘Carbon Offsets’. Come on people, whatever NZ does it makes no difference to the weather (climate).

The Government  purchases over  a million tonnes of dirty dusty cheap coal from Indonesia.  The Chinese government has a target of bringing 80GW of new coal fired generation capacity online for the whole of 2024. China accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power construction activity in 2023. China has at least 80% of the global market share in Solar manufacturing capacity. March 2024 it was reported in the New York Times that China has come to dominate the World in Solar Energy, as it has unleashed the full might of its Solar Energy Industry last year. It installed more solar panels than the United States has in its history. (How is this going to help NZ’s Small businesses and Farmers?)

Carbon Offsets ‘The Morgan Report 2016’ The Government and a number of company’s purchased Russian & Ukraine Carbon Offsets knowing they were fraudulent. It was reported that NZ Government was going to use them for their 2020  Climate Change Obligations  however they got caught out a good one. Clean Green New Zealand became known as ‘The Biggest Climate Crims in the World’. Carbon offsetting is truly a scammer’s dream scheme. It’s a bookkeeping trick.

26th May 2016  David Seymour Speaker in the House (Beehive) “ The emissions trading scheme is like a piece of Swiss cheese public policy, it’s filled with ho;es and deliberately so, so it never quite achieves its objective, yet it gives the impression the government is trying to do something” He then referred to Paul Bennet (Paula Benefit) and a Carbons Emissions Bill she had bought to the attention of the House the day previous. Seymour responding  “She keeps on saying it’s going to do quite a bit (this new  bill), then each time she says that, she pulls back and says “but it won’t actually have any binding biting effects on real activity”. He continued on, as he referred to the ‘two-for-one discount on carbon credits’ as he said “there is something you seriously need to know about the emissions trading scheme. “Throughout  the schemes history there’s been a whole host of adjustments as to what sort of credit you can redeem within New Zealand, what sort of activities are included, and when they are going to be included. The truth is  that it is designed to give the impression of doing something without actually building any sector to change its behavior, and provides vast amounts of rooms for ‘horse trading’ and maneuvering”

Seymour adds “ The emissions trading scheme is and has always been an utter joke. Today we find ourselves debating under urgency as part of a Budget Measure, the removal of the 2 for 1 discount, which should never have been needed in a serious piece of public policy designed to reduce emissions in the first place. What Seymour does not say that the press gallery can report on is that those 2 for  1 discount emission credits were a way of dumping those that they purchased extremely cheaply when they deliberately, knowingly purchased fraudulent cheap as carbon credits from Russia and Ukraine. But David Seymour went ahead and supported Paul (Benefit) Green House Gas Emissions Bill. .

Its well reported the whole practice of carbon offsetting is very fundamentally flawed its just like pushing food around on your plate, to give the impression that you have actually eaten some of it. Companies are often found fudging figures, out right telling porkies. There is no industry standard, there is nothing to measure improvements against, that means companies can claim whatever they like.. I have read David Seymours book he published in 2017   ‘Own Your Own Future: A Liberal Vision for New Zealand in 2017.

Page 162  Chapter on the Environment. He said he grew up terrified of the environment. Eeem. In the UK there is an official Mental disorder called ‘Eco Anxiety’ where children cannot concentrate on their school work, they are anxious, scared and have nightmares because they are being taught the ‘seas are rising’, the planet is on fire’. (These are scumbags that indoctrinate put these fears into children’s  lives)  Seymour says “he should blame the 1990’s cartoon ‘Captain Planet’, where children fought ‘eco-terrorists’ they then called Captain Planet that sorted the Eco-terrorists out. Captain Planet had special moon rings. The underlying message was that we are all bad and we are doomed for it”.  Obviously David Seymour learned nothing from this as they still indoctrinate children with the doom and gloom with their weapons of fear.

Seymour adds “the Green MPs are the biggest users of free parliamentary air travel, then NZ First MPs. As he referred to a party of Green MPs flying off to Paris to a Climate Change gathering. And they are the most hypocritical of them all. I’d say that Christopher Luxon done his fare of travelling around the world in this last twelve months too, yet another Climate Zealot. Page 170 of Seymours book becomes even more interesting “The reason the doomsters (Climate Doomsters) get the future wrong is that they underestimate or even ignore technological change. If you predict the future on the basis of the current technology you will be wrong” Seymour writes. “Not just a little wrong, but wildly so”

Then Seymour takes a trip down the same rabbit holes I have been down (LOL) when he writes “there has been a few pessimists gone wrong over the years from Malthus on population in 1978, to Ehrlich  in 1968 ‘The Population Bomb;, to the ‘Club Of Rome’ in 1972 (Limits to Growth). To Al Gore claiming in 2006 that we only had 10 years left on this planet”. Adding “And we are still here and thriving, in fact the past 30 years have witnessed the greatest reduction in global poverty in the history of this planet”. Page 173 “ACTs policy has always been to dump to ETS, just have a low carbon tax until they prove or disprove whether there is global warming  rising or  drop it if the risks are likely to be lower”. After all David Seymour described himself as a ‘Luke Warmest’ . He adds “as far as global warming is concerned Zealand is very much a passenger. We are just merely being ‘Good Global Citizens”. We don’t have the power to change the climate. “Whatever actions New Zealand takes will have effectively zero impact on global warming outcomes. But there is a strong case for us to contribute as being good global citizens” . New Zealand has no influence on the outcomes when it comes to climate change (global warming) “ Seymour writes (Page 173).

Wait for it people 2025 we will be hit with Congestion Tax on certain roads at certain times of the day. Congestion tax is applied to vehicles on booth entry and exist from the zone. The amount to pay depends on the time of the day the driver enters or exits the congestion tax area. The payment gates are equipped with number plate recognition cameras. This is already implemented in some countries. Less cars on the road, more E bikes scooters , cycling, public transport. They truly are determined to control your life. We eat bugs cycle, walk, catch a bus or train, they fly  back and forth across the world, eat steaks and live the high life. Whilst  the average house rates will be increasing by approx., $1,000 over the next three years.

Over the past few years the Government have blamed the farmers for polluting water ways, methane emissions etc., They are having a pause moment for now..but do you really trust this govt. I personally believe they are just shifting the deckchairs around on the sinking titanic. UN Agencies, UN Organizations appear to have the over-riding say as to how this government governs NZ. After all successive governments have agreed to 1900 UN Agreements since 1945.

Take the Local Government Act 2002. Even before it passed Royal Accent they knew there was a loophole in it, yet it still was passed into Legislation. The loophole meant that businesses, companies could break Trade Waste Water Regulations and not be fined. Hundreds have done this, over the 20 plus years. Sometimes 2 hundred plus companies per years and often several times in one year. All the govt had to do was to amend the Act but they have not, as a consequence of this heavy toxins, nitrates, ammonia has been leached down drains.  The lights in the sewage ponds covered is awful yellowy fat and glug. The ammonia has eaten away at underground concrete pipes that cost a fortune to replace. (Rate payers expense). Cars and people have fallen into these broken pipes. In 2022 Nanaia Mahuta Minister for Local Govt was  questioned what, when the  Local Govt Act would be amended. She responded that a new water regulator was taking over, but it would be a couple of years before they did anything about it.  April 2024.. Peters states “Yes New Zealand is still committed to UN Global Agenda 2030. They are still committed to the Climate scam. End goal the same as the last government, just different designs.

WakeUpNZ

Researcher Cassie

CHRISTCHURCH AND WELLINGTON ‘THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION’ The Rockefeller Foundation pioneered the ‘100 Resilient Cities’. The Rockefeller website states “To help cities better prepare, respond to 21^st Century challenges. The Foundation made a $100 million commitment to building so called Resilient Cities around the world, thus providing a platform for these cities. Each city collaborating coordinating sharing knowledge, new connections and new partnerships. With each city hiring or funding a Chief Resilience Officer (CRO). A specific role for one person in a City Government, creating resilience plans, resources for implementation of the Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities global  action plan. Providing tools, a platform, resources for implementation of the plan in four areas:-

HUMAN MUST LEARN TO ADAPT TO CATASTROPHIC TIMES: Innovative finance, innovative technology, infrastructure and land use, and community and social resilience from partners such as Swiss Re, Palantir, the American Institute of Architects, Architecture for Humanity, and the World Bank. 100 Resilient Cities the ability to recover or withstand catastrophic events-natural and manmade. The theory being “Humans are unable to adapt to catastrophic events so they must learn to adapt to them and improve upon their ability to do so.

CLINTON AND ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATIONS ‘ NZ CITIES’: May 2013, on its Centennial, The Rockefeller Foundation announced a $100 million commitment to build urban resilience in cities around the world. Through 100 Resilient Cities, in the coming years 100 cities will join the new 100 Resilient Cities Network. Nearly 400 cities  applied to be one of Rockefellers Resilience Cities across six continents . Eight judges on a panel would select recommend what Cities should be approved. Bill Clinton US President was a member of the Panel. Cities receive Grant Money to hire a Chief Resilience Officer. Rockefeller Foundation gives cities a million dollars each.

HISTORY OF RUTHLESSNESS AND GREED: Urban/City Resilience is the product of a century of the Rockefeller leadership . The mission of the Rockefeller Foundation since 1913 started with John D Rockefeller. The dark side of John D Rockefellers was criticized as  a ‘ruthless and greedy capitalist whom unfairly crushed his competition and created a malevolent monopoly. He monopolized in full Standard Oil Company and Trust, an American company and corporate trust from 1870-1911. The industrial empire of John D Rockefeller and associates, controlling almost all oil production, processing, marketing and transportation in the US.

THE ROCKEFELLER EMPIRE: John D Rockefeller heirs, the Rockefeller Trust is still very powerful and strong.. His oldest son, David Rockefeller Jr., 76, continues to protect the family’s financial security and philanthropy. The Rockefeller net worth is currently valued at $8.4 billion, spread out over 170 heirs. The Rockefellers own many companies including General Mills, Kellogg, Nestle, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, Proctor and Gamble, Roche and Hoechst (Sanofi-Aventis). The Rockefeller empire is in tandem with Chase Manhattan Bank (Now JP Morgan Chase) owning over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the US.  Such as Pfizer dating back to 2011.

NEW ZEALAND ‘AUCKLAND CITY’ JUMPS ON BOARD C40 CITIES:  There are 96 Cities worldwide. Mayor of London C40 Chair Sadiq Khan.  C40 is also positioning cities as a leading force for climate action around the world, defining and amplifying their call to national governments for greater support and autonomy in creating a sustainable future. C40 started in October 2005 when London Mayor Ken Livingstone convened representatives from 18 megacities to forge an agreement on cooperatively reducing climate pollution and created the ‘C20’. 2006 Mayor Livingston and the Clinton Foundation bringing together the C40’s network. Livingstone established the C40 Secretariat in London, setting up a steering committee for C40 Cities, initiated C40 workshops amongst participating cities. 2015 C40 Cities 10^th anniversary, city leaders ambitiously going forward

C40 CITIES ‘MEGA CITIES’: More than 1,000 mayors, local representatives, and community leaders^[13] from around the world took part in the Climate Summit for Local Leaders, hosted by Mayor of Paris Anne Hidalgo and the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change Michael R. Bloomberg during the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference. C40 cities originally targeting mega cities now have membership categories. ‘Diversity of Cities, Economic output, Environmental Leadership’

THE VACCINE ALLIANCE ‘C 40 CITIES’ MEGA-CITIES.  A population of 3 million people is projected to be a population of 10 million or more by 2025. Population of 3 million or more, projected population 10 million or more  by 2025 by the C40 Networking alliance. C40 has 96 member cities across seven geographic regions. Partners C40 Cities is a member of the Peoples Vaccine Alliance. Additional Partners include.

C 40 PARTNERS: .  Include the  Clinton Foundation, World Bank, World Resources Institute and more. FUNDING is made possible by three strategic funders ‘’Bloomberg Philanthropies, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation and Realdania. ADDITIONAL FUNDING includes are ARUP, Citigroup, ClimateWorks Foundation, Open Societies Foundation (George Soros), FedEX,  Rockefeller Brothers Fund, TED Foundation, Wellcome Trust

WELLCOME TRUST CONNECTION TO C40 CITIES AND HEALTH PHILANTHROPIES:  . In 1995 the Wellcome Trust sold shares to Glaxo Kline, forming the worlds largest pharmaceutical company (Glaxo Welcome Plc). 7^th May 2024 the Worlds three largest Health Philanthropes join forces in a $300 million Initiative to support innovation in developing countries (The Novo Nordisk Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Wellcome Trust)

C 40 CITIES NETWORK GLOBAL, REGIONAL FOUNDATIONS (PHILANTHROPIES ‘ GOVERNMENTS AND BUSINESSES: September 15^th 2023 Global Public Heath.. Calls To Action.,. Philanthropy Asia Alliance crosses $1 billion in pledges to catalyze solutions for global environmental and social challenges, References are made to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, C 40 Cities, the Rockefeller Foundation, Population Services International, MasterCard Centre for Inclusive Growth. Bringing global and regional philanthropies together to work with governments, businesses, and other stakeholders to catalyze and scale up innovations.”

C40 CITIES ‘THREE ANCHOR MANDATES: Climate and Nature, Inclusive and Holistic Education, and Global and Public Health – to impact global communities. These CTAs tap on philanthropic capital to test out innovative models to drive positive climate and community change.  $1 Billion dollars in pledges to catalyze solutions for the global environment and social challenges. The idea that mass uncontrolled migration is good for our economy.

BEEHIVE IMPROVES MASS MIGRATION MANAGEMENT: Erica Stanford.

C40 CITIES NETWORK ‘AUCKLAND CITY MEM BERSHIP OF C 40 CITIES’:  . C40 Cities partnership with Global Mayors Migration Council and Mayors Mitigation Council. (Rockefellers and Clinton Foundation included). Ambitious up scaling migration by City Mayors across the world.

RESEARCHER: Cassie

A 7 year old boy sexualized, exploited shame on the parents and shame on NZ Herald. But all funded by the taxpayers of New Zealand.  Follow this link to FamilyFirstNZ . The agenda of the once great NZ Herald is becoming very clear – and for those who weren’t sure, this week removed any doubt. In a specifically child-focused section on the newspaper website, they featured a 7-year-old child in stilettos pushing cat walking, crossdressing and even some twerking. Who needs drag queens in libraries to indoctrinate our children when we have the NZ Herald. Sexual grooming of children in NZ. This surely is childhood sexual exploitation where pedophiles would have a field day. This 7 year old boy acts like an adult drag queen and has all the gear that goes with it. This should be shared far and wide. It’s sickening and bloody disgusting. For children by children published and implemented by adults.

WakeUpNZ

RSEARCHER Cassie

RESOURCED INFORMATION FROM UN NEWS 13^th September 2007… THE 61^st SESSION. OF THE 107^th & 108^th MEETING AT THE UN ASSEMBLY (GA/10612)

CLAIRE CHARTERS IS AN INFLUENTIAL MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL IWI CHAIRS FORUM. A Professor at Auckland University Faculty Of Law on Indigenous Peoples Rights & Constitutional Law (https://tikatangata.org.nz/about-us/professor-claire-charters) She is also the representative of the Iwi National Chairs Forum that’s in a  partnership with the NZ Human Rights Commission. Where Charters plays a role in pushing the implementation of the UNDRIP into NZ’s Legislative- constitutional Arrangements. She has been widely outspoken at the UN. Representing Iwi in Treaty negotiations, Working in the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights. Advisor to the UN General Assembly on Indigenous Peoples Rights. Participating in the UN General Assembly

WHEN DAVID SEYMOUR REPORTED TODAY THAT THE NZ HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SHOULD CEASE TO EXIST: I totally agree with him. Its obviously Race Based and Corrupt. And supports a 2 class citizenship in New Zealand.

CLAIRE CHARTERS IS BUSY FLITTING OFF TO THE UN WAS AGAIN: This time its to complain about the Three Party Coalition ‘Repressing so called Indigenous People in Aotearoa (Indigenous People and Aotearoa coined phrases that do not exist for New Zealand or those with Māori ancestry in NZ) Charters complaining about the Govt repressing Indigenous People (Māori) Requesting that a High Level UN Official take the Three Party Coalition to task. To embed the UN Declaration on Indigenous Peoples Rights into the Constitutional Arrangement- Legislative of NZ. Complaining about Winston Peters saying that they will get rid of the UNDRIP. And that “Māori are Not Indigenous”. Of course anyone saying- questioning this will be called Racist. So many people self censor and will not talk about the Facts “Māori are Not Indigenous People”

SO HERE WE GO AGAIN Claire Charters last month meeting with UN High Level Officials in New York- NZ Diplomats and other Iwi/Māori also attending the UN (eem whom pays for this?) The continued pushing, determination to embed the UNDRIP into NZ’s Constitutional Arrangements. (From the highest source possible) For the UN Senior Officials to take the 3 Party Coalition to task. – (https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2025/04/28/maori-leaders-urge-un-to-act-on-nzs-regressive-policies/)

THE 2022 KERERO CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE- AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY 2022: Was held to Discuss, Inform – As to how the UNDRIP could be implemented into NZ’s Constitutional Arrangements . The transforming of NZs Constitution. Claire Charters made recommendations on the constitutional design (The aspirations of the Matiki Mai Report) reflected in Te Tiriti o Waitangi and He Whakaputanga . Also ideas that centred around Tikanga as a legal system of the land.

ALSO DISCUSSED AT THE CONFERENCE WAS:-DEMOCRACY DOES NOT WORK FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE  References were made to:- *Indigenous People- Self Determination * Indigenous authority over lands, resources, people  *The illegitimacy of the British Crown in his claim to Sovereignty. Change of Governance Foundations- Structures * Rethinking NZs Constitutional Arrangements to realize Māori Rights. The Need for a Radical Change. Naiana Mahuta  opened the end day of the conference with a speech  (1835 Declaration of Independence) (https://www.democracyaction.org.nz/report_on_the_constitutional_k_rero_2022_conference)  (https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/speech-constitutional-k%C5%8Drero-conference)

22^nd NOVEMBER 2022 NANAIA MUHUTA SPEECH AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL KORERO CONFERENCE: She referred to the Partnership between the Crown and Māori. The Principles of the Partnership in the Treaty and a consistent call for Constitutional change in NZ. That the NZ Govt supports Indigenous Business Connections through Indigenous led Collaboration Agreements where in August 2022 a new Indigenous Collaboration Agreement between NZ and Canada was signed to enhance Indigenous relationships. The need for radical transformation

THE NZ HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND THE NATIONAL IWI CHAIRS FORUM PARTNERSHIP In designing a new Constitution for NZ worked together to implement the UNDRIP into NZs Constitutional Arrangements. 20^th March 2023 Auckland University. Indigenous Rights Conference. As a High Randing UN Official on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Cali Tzay visited Auckland University) to participate in ‘Designing NZs  Constitutional Arrangements.  The conference was organized by the National Iwi Chairs Forum and NZ Human Rights Commission said to be in memory of Moana Jackson ( whom in the 1990’s helped to draft the UNDRIP at the UN itself). Margaret Mutu and Claire Charters were influential members of the Conference discussing Indigenous Rights in NZ. Again referring to the Govt reneging on the UNDRIP (https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2024/03/20/indigenous-rights-in-the-spotlight-at-constitutional-conference.html)

UN NEWS WEB PAGE 13^TH SEPTEMBER 2007. THE ADOPTION OF THE UN DECLARATION ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS (UNDRIP) at the New York UN Assembly. The Vote= 143 Countries in Favor of the UNDRIP – 4 Opposed Australia, Canada. US and NZ. And 11 Abstentions. (The UNDRIP took approximately 25 years to draft with much controversy during the drafting of the UN Declaration). Several Iwi/Maori were involved in drafting the UNDRIP including Moana Jackson in the early 1990’s

WHY DID NEW ZEALAND LABOUR LED GOVERNMENT OBJECTED TO THE UNDRIP (DID NOT ADOPT IT??  NZs UN Representative was Rosemary Banks (She explained  why NZ would not adopt the UNDRIP). During the 25 years of drafting to UNDRIP there had been much controversy. She said that already nearly 40% of NZs Fishing Quota was owned by Māori as a result of NZ’s strategy for redress (Compensation to Treaty Claims. And claims to over half of  NZs land area had been settled already. (During the drafting of the UN Declaration NZ under Labour Govt had supported the principles and aspirations of the UNDRIP) Saying that NZ had already implemented most of the standards in the UNDRIP already. Rosemary Banks said the UN Declaration was well overdue from the perspective of a  basic Human Rights point of view. Saying NZ is proud to have participated in the drafting of the UNDRIP

BUT ROSEMARY BANKS STATED ‘ THAT ITS WITH GREAT REGRETS THAT NZ CANNOT PROMOTE (UPHOLD) SUPPORT THE TEXT OF THE UNDRIP BEFORE THE ASSEMBLY:  Saying there is a number of difficulties being:- Where a number of Provisions are fundamentally incompatible with NZs Constitutional and Legal Arrangements – Banks explained that “ Unfortunately, New Zealand had difficulties with a number of provisions of the text.  In particular, four provision and the Treaty Of Waitangi  *That the Treaty of Waitangi  is the principle of ‘governing for the good of ALL  NZ Citizens.  (Article 26 ) On Lands and Natural Resources & (Article 28) on Redress (Compensation) also (Articles 19 and 32 ) on the Rights of Veto over the State were reasons for not adopting the UNDRIP

(ARTICLE 26) THE PROVISIONS OF LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES COULD NOT BE IMPLEMENTED IN NZ: As (Article 26) states that Indigenous Peoples have a right to Own, Use, Develop or Control Lands and Terrirories that they had Traditionally owned – Occupied or Used. (this means the  entire Country is caught up in this scope). Thus requiring recognition to lands now lawfully owned by Maori and Non- Maori Citizens in New Zealand (With no recognition of Lawful Property Ownership and Rights)

THAT INDIGENOUS PEOPLES HAVE RIGHTS THAT OTHER NZ CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE: Article 28 in the UN Declaration on Redress (Compensation) this also takes into the scope the Entire Country of NZ. Again did not take into account Land legitimately owned by NZ Citizens.  And numerous overlapping Indigenous Claims. The UN Declaration implies that Indigenous peoples have a Veto Right over Democratic Legislature and National Resource Management. Again implied different classes of Citizenship where Indigenous had the Right that other Groups /Individuals do not have.

THE UNDRIP  IS FUNDAMENTALLY INCOMPATIABLE WITH DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES- LEGISLATION – CONSTITUIONAL ARRNGEMENTS IN NZ: Is seen purely as an Aspiration document, intended to Inspire with No Legal effect. Rosemary Banks added that “The history of drafting the UN Declaration was that the negotiations took place in a divided manner did not reflect in the States practice, would not be recognized as a general principle of law. . (https://press.un.org/en/2007/ga10612.doc.htm)

15^th SEPTEMBER 2007 (TWO DAYS AFTER THE UNDRIP WAS OBJECTED TO BY THE LABOUR LED GOVERNMENT ‘ PAREKURA HOROMIA MINISTER OF MAORI AFFAIRS: Spoke in Parliament accusing the Māori Party of ‘Hollow Talk’ over Labours decision not to support the UNDRIP. He referred to Tariana Turia’s ridiculous claim “that the govt believe Indigenous People are Sub-Human with only Sub-Human Rights”. He called the UN Declaration ‘Toothless’. Incompatible with NZs Constitutional & Legal arrangements and NZs established Treaty Settlement Policy. He reinterated exactly what Rosemary Banks had said at the UN Assembly- why NZ would not endorse the UNDRIP and agreed with her. Horomia then told the Maori Party to “get their heads out of the clouds, to focus on achieving real milestones rather than Pie-In-The-Sky- Talk”

20^th APRIL  2010 JOHN KEY -NATIONAL PARTY PRIME MINISTER- DID THE DIRTY ON NZ CITIZENS WHEN HE MADE A SECRET DEAL WITH THE CO-LEADER OF THE MAORI PARTY PITA SHARPLES. Under a veil of secrecy  Sharples and Key arranged for Sharples to visit the UN and to adopt the UNDRIP. When Rodney Hide  took John Key to task on this in Parliament. John Key stated that the veil of Secrecy was “He did not want to spoil Pita Sharples Thunder”. Rodney Hide ACT Party leader was shocked and appalled that this had happened and bluntly made it known. John Key said “He always supported  NZs endorsement of the UNDRIP” . (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3600224/Hide-Indigenous-declaration-breaches-deal)

RE-VISITING HISTORY (23^rd February 1999) SPEAKER IN THE HOUSE DOUG GRAHAM TREATY NEGOTIATIONS MINISTER: The speech  being on ‘Māori Claims for Sovereignty where the Māori Council were threatening to lobby APEC Countries to support them. Doug Grahams response was that APEC countries would not be interested..its no business of theirs. The Māori Council were determined to implement Maori Sovereignty based on the 1835 Declaration of Independence signed by 35 Māori Chiefs with well intentioned Missionaries Doug Graham in his speech referred to Justice Temm’s Judicial case of 1993 reiterating what was stated :-

THAT THE 1835 DECLARATION IS ONLY A MATTER OF INTEREST FOR HISTORIANS HAS NO RELEVANCE TO LAWYERS IN NZ: The course of events  from when the Treaty Of Waitangi was signed in 1840 (referencing Governor Hobson’s issuing his Proclamation on 21^st May 1840). The Royal Proclamation ratified the Treaty Of Waitangi (was published in the NZ Gazette on 2^nd October 1840) And from that year on the Writ of English Law began to run in NZ. Doug Graham said “If Māori still claim they are Sovereign, then Māori effectively terminated the Treaty Of Waitangi. Therefore have no rights to Treaty Claims” (They cannot have it both ways Doug Graham added) And to that point he said that “He cannot see that Māori would rescind Treaty Claims”

DOUG GRAHAM CONCLUDED ‘ THAT’S ITS QUESTIONABLE WHY THE MAORI COUNCIL ARE ACTUALLY CLAIMING SOVERIENTY OF NZ: Asking “Is it because they want to have the sole right to pass laws binding on ALL NZ Citizens or is it just Māori?” And “Surely that would be reliant on Māori Support”?  and “ where is that support?” and “How would that work?”. “Would Māori in Auckland be subjected to different laws as applied to their Non-Māori neighbors that live next door”? Then Doug Graham concluded that “Māori in NZ do not live on reservations like the Natives in Canada, and that from a practical point of view ‘Māori Sovereignty is totally inconsistent with todays world”

DOUG GRAHAM ALSO SAID THAT ‘ ENGLISH COMMON LAW NOR THE TREATY OF WAITANGI WOULD PERMIT ‘MAORI SOVEREIGNTY’ That the Treaty Of Waitangi did not include any concept of a ‘Joint Government’ And that there are those that continue to mislead the citizens of NZ in thinking that the Treaty Of Waitangi is a Partnership between Crown & Maori”

CLAIRE CHARTERS INFLUENTIAL MEMBER OF THE IWI NATIONAL CHAIRS FORUM THAT PARTNERS WITH THE NZ HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION: Continues to push the corruption to separate- divides the Nation of NZ Citizens with engaging with the UN on numerous occasions. (Determined for NZ to embed the UNDRIP into our domestic Policies and Constitutional Arrangements). The UNDRIP is Non-Binding. Sits outside Hard Law (Legislation) Sits in Soft Law here it can be used as tool for NZ Human Rights Commission and Certain Iwi/Māori Individuals and Groups.

DAVID SEYMOUR TODAY ANNOUNCED THAT THE NZ  HUMAN RIGHT COMMISSION SHOULD BE GONE (FULL STOP). Peters is correct we should abolish the UNDRIP. Revisiting History – In 1971 George Manuel the President of the Columbian National Brotherhood met with the Māori Council. Graeme Latimer was the Chair of the Maori Council. He also later became the Co Founder of the Waitangi Tribunal. George Manuel had travelled the world for Native Peoples to adopt the coined phrase ‘Indigenous Peoples’. This is when it became popularized on NZ Shores. Graham Latimer led 250 so called Indigenous people on a visit to Columbia to launch the World Indigenous Council. George Manuel became the first President of the UN World Indigenous Council.

THE UNDRIP SITS  IN SOFT LAW -OUTSIDE HARD LEGISLATIVE LAW (It is a Non-Binding Declaration)  There have been continued pushes to embed the UN Declaration into NZs Constitutional Arrangements and Domestic Policies. With Claire Charters influential member of the National Iwi Chairs Forum visiting the UN on a number of occasion to ask for UN High Level Official support  to demand that the NZ Govt  officially legislate the  UNDRIP. However the change in Govt is proving rather difficult- so another trip to the UN by Claire Charters last month where she accused the Three Party Coalition of being Repressive when it comes to adopting the UN Declaration not acknowledging Iwi/Māori (So called Indigenous Rights)

CLAIRE CHARTERS COMPLAINING TO THE UN GATHERING THAT WINSTON PETERS ANNOUNCED ‘ MAORI ARE NOT INDIGENOUS’ AND WOULD GET RID OF THE UNDRIP: The coined Phrase ‘Indigenous Peoples’ was adopted by the Māori Council in 1971 upon the first meeting with ‘George Manuel’ whom became the President of the UN International Council Of Indigenous Peoples.

THE REASON FOR THE MASSIVE HIKOI IS ‘ TO PUSH THE UNDRIP INTO NZ’S LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. CONSTITUTIONAL – DOMESTIC LAWS’ NZ FIRST AND ACT PARTY DAVID SEYMOUR HAVE BECOME A PAIN IN THE BUTT (A THORN IN THE SIDE) FOR THOSE  IWI/MAORI. TE PATI MAORI.. GREENS AND LABOUR WHOM ARE DETERMINED FOR THIS TO HAPPEN. (The Separation- division of NZ Citizens is deliberately being played out)

SOURCE OF INFORMATION INCLUDED IS FROM THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION OF THE RECORDED GATHERING: Of the Maori Council  IN 2010 (Officially stamped by NZ Ministry Of Justice and Waitangi Tribunal)

(https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/maori-claims-sovereignty-lack-credibility)

WakeUpNZ  – RESEARCHER: Cassie.