How the United Nations is quietly being turned into a public-private partnership

A new agreement with the World Economic Forum gives multinational corporations influence over matters of global governance.

Harris Gleckman

Anew corporate and government marriage quietly took place last week when the leadership of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to partner with each other. While this MOU is proudly displayed on the WEF website, it is nowhere to be found on the UN website. The only indication on the UN website of this important new development is a picture of the pen used to sign the agreement, and two pictures of the signing ceremony.

One reason for this difference is that the UN’s corporate-centered Global Compact has received a good deal of bad press. Now the new WEF-UN agreement creates a second special place for multinational corporations inside the UN. There is no similar institutional homes in the UN system for civil society, for academics, for religious leaders, or for youth. It is hard to imagine a national government signing a similar formal partnership with one of its business organizations.

At the same time, the UN is under pressure from Donald Trump who wants to deconstruct the whole multilateral system. For Trump, dismantling the international system built after World War II is a companion piece to his domestic effort at deconstructing the administrative state. For the Secretary-General of the UN, the pact with the WEF may well be his effort to find new power actors who can support the current system, which is now celebrating its 75th anniversary, in the face of Trump’s onslaught.

On the other side, the WEF recently received significant public criticism after giving Hungarian Prime Minister Orban and Brazilian President Bolsonaro a warm welcome at its 2019 Davos gathering. This marriage may be seen as a way for the WEF to re-establish itself as part of the global governance center.

The timing and managing of public perceptions are not the only interesting aspect of this arrangement. In 2009, the WEF published a 600 page report entitled the Global Redesign Initiative, which called for a new system of global governing, one in which the decisions of governments could be made secondary to multistakeholder led initiatives in which corporations would play a defining role. In a sense this WEF study recommended a sort of public-private United “Nations” – something that has now been formalized in this MOU. The agreement announces new multistakeholder partnerships to deliver public goods in the fields of education, women, financing, climate change, and health.

The rather detailed MOU includes forms of cross organizational engagement up and down the UN structure. The MOU contains commitments that the Secretary-General himself will be invited to deliver a keynote address at the WEF annual Davos gatherings. His senior staff and the heads of the UN programmes, funds, and agencies will also be invited to participate in regional level meetings hosted by the WEF. It also contains a promise that the UN’s individual country representatives will explore ways to work with WEF’s national Forum Hubs. Aware of the mutual importance of public legitimacy each institution can provide for the other, the MOU also contains an agreement to cross-publicize their joint activities.

Besides the institutional blessing of the United Nations, what does the WEF get from the MOU? The scope of each of the five fields for joint attention is narrowed down from the intergovernmentally negotiated and agreed set of goals to one with more in line with the business interests of WEF members. So under financing, the MOU calls only for ‘build[ing] a shared understanding of sustainable investing’ but not for reducing banking induced instabilities and tax avoidance.

Under climate change, it calls for ‘ …public commitments from the private sector to reach carbon neutrality by 2050’, not actions that result in carbon neutrality by 2030 . Under education, it re-defines the Sustainable Development education goal to ‘ensure inclusive and equitable quality education’ into one that focuses on education to meet the ‘rapidly changing world of work.’ The MOU explicitly restricts the WEF from making financial contributions to the UN, which might have ameliorated the economic impact of some of Trump’s threat to the budgets of the UN system. At the same time, it avoids any commitment to reduce global inequality, to make energy affordable, to hold multinational corporations accountable for human rights violations, or even to rein in the behavior of the WEF’s firms that act inconsistently to the re-defined goals set out in the agreement.

All this joint work might have some practical good if it were not for three crucial elements: firstly, the agreement circumvents the intergovernmental review process; secondly, the agreement elevates multistakeholderism as the solution to the problems with the current multilateral system; and thirdly the proposed multistakeholder partnerships are not governed by any formal democratic system. Were the Secretary-General convinced of the wisdom of a UN marriage with the WEF, he could have submitted the draft MOU for approval by the member states. Instead, the Secretary-General joined the WEF in declaring in effect that multistakeholder groups without any formal intergovernmental oversight are a better governance system than a one-country-one-vote system.

All multistakeholder governance groups are largely composed of a self-selected group of multinational corporations and those organizations and individuals that they want to work with. They work without any common internal rule book to protect the views of all who might be impacted by the group. Participation in multistakeholder group is a voluntary undertaking. The drop-in-drop-out arrangements are antithetical to the UN’s efforts for 75 years to build a stable secure global governance system with a clear understanding of obligations, responsibilities and liabilities.

What is surprising is that by accepting this marriage arrangement with the WEF, the Secretary-General of the UN is marginalizing the intergovernmental system in order to ‘save’ it.

Open Democracy 2nd July 2019

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/how-united-nations-quietly-being-turned-public-private-partnership/?source=in-article-related-story

...

WEF/ Global Reset Blog Posts View all Categories

THE GOOD BAD AND THE UGLY ‘FEEL THE FEAR AND DO IT ANY’

Pushing through the fear is much less frightening than living with the underlying fear. The fear that leaves you feeling isolated, alone and helpless. Often we just need to self educate ourselves more and surround ourselves with people who will not judge us but support us.

We learn by our mistakes, we learn by the good, the bad and the ugly that tends to enter our lives. Life is an interesting journey. You travel one road, but you can always change direction and journey down another.

Being bludgeoned by the weapon of fear can leave you in a very scarey place, leaving you feeling helpless and alone, its not a healthy place to be.

During this COVID era is a time of narcistic behavior on steroids,  that’s causing a cruel division among family members, friends.

I mysel,  have personally had to face the fear and do it anyway. It’s not easy to publicly putting yourself out there, knowing full well you will be targeted. , however the good, the bad and the ugly has led me to this place and my inner truth will not allow me to be a traitor to myself I have to do what I do. Everything in life you do has a consequence, be it good, bad or ugly.

I am who I am and I cannot escape, nor do I want to escape from my inner truth.

I have produced a video briefly about how and why I personally took this road, to Wake Up New Zealand.  Its all about the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

For those who are living in fear, if you do not change your direction you are likely to end up where you are heading.  Fear, anxiety, distress  will deplete your natural immune system, will make you sick.   I pray my video will give  encouragement to those who are living in this fear driven COVID19 world.  God Bless and God Save New Zealand

NOTE: PLEASE GO TO MY IMAGE ABOVE AND CLICK ON THE ARROW WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO ON THIS IMPORTANT SUBJECT.

 

IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED UP TO THIS WEBSITE YET, PLEASE DO SO NOW – CAROL SAKEY. ..THANK YOU

...

MANDATED NOW >>> DEPLOYED IN THE FUTURE

REFERENCING: The World Health (UN)  COVID-19 Research and Innovation Report dated February 2022. An R & D Blueprint powering research to prevent epidemics.

The World Health Organization  R &D Blueprint achievements summary was introduced at the request of 194 UN Member states in May 2015.  This is a blueprint of action to prevent epidemics.

A global strategic preparedness plan for the whole world to enact. This focuses on global research actions to be deployed in future new threats from viruses and other pathogens. Data to  be the critical enabler. Hence collaboration between Big Pharma and Big Data.

During the COVID19 era there are enormous significant changes to societies  behaviours. A social and behaviour re-engineering of people’s lives. Often destroying the relationship between friends and family members.

This  totalitarian controlling governance has hastily introduced a behaviour modification, where individuals are gradually being given ESG Scores. A system of rewards and punishments. Much like the Chinese Social Credit System. For example if you purchase meat your ESG Scoring will decline, if you eat more veges it will increase.

ESG scores can be made adaptable as a compliance to COVID19 Laws, Orders. ESG Scoring is a part of the  global response that has been grouped under an ESG label namely -Environmental, Social and Governance.. (Restrictions, Controls, Rewards)

The UN Research Roadmap for the COVID-19 Recovery provides a framework for leveraging the power of science in support of a better socio-economic recovery and a more equitable, resilient and sustainable future. All references to a ‘Sustainable Future eludes to UN Agenda 2030.  The Socio-Economic recovery is the reshaping of the Worlds Economy and Society itself.

A common language program is being freely taught to Journalist worldwide, this includes anti-vaccine activism. (The influencing propaganda Machine)

The WHO February  2022 report uses the words- Futuristic  Sustainability. Note the  UN Immunization Agenda 2030” Is a Global Strategy to Leave No-One Behind” Which came to an end in 2020.

A New vision, a global strategy for vaccines and immunisation was needed. Hence the decade of vaccines 2020-2030.  The UN reports this to be a new direction for the next decade- 2020-2030- Immunizations and beyond, at all levels

Delivering vaccines along the life’s course, from the cradle to the grave. Implementing them during emergencies also included addressing vaccine hesitancy. Ensure global vaccine supplies meet national needs.

The Global UN Strategy Of Vaccines is reported by the UN as UN Agenda SDG 3

The UN Immunization Agenda 2030. A global strategy to leave no-ne behind was introduced prior to the pandemic September 2019- the consultation of the Copenhagen Vaccine Industry. This report of September 2019 references global Vaccines to leave no-one behind documents 2021-2030. Also relates to Global Vaccines relating to the mitigation of Climate Change Impact.

A stronger focus on vaccinations for the elderly and refers to the report “Decade of Health Ageing 2020-2030. IA 2030 refers to technical guidance living throughout 2021-2030

The UN/ UN Nations Government’s 194 nations have agreed to a vision where everyone, everywhere, at every age

Data driven predictive, biased, indicators, assumptions, mixing of past predictive data. All produced to serve government police makers which in turn govern, control people.

You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours and as a result will  determine, demands shots in everyone’s arms. The crucial enabler -Data in and Data Out. AI Digital technology.

When mandates for jabs, COVID19 restrictions continue please note this us not the end of UN AI Vision Impact Goal to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The Global Strategy Of Vaccines, demanding vaccines is not going away.  UN Agenda 2030 14 out of 17 Global Goals is not going away.

How else are they going to demand everyone, everywhere at every age are jabbed. A lifetime of jabs, demanding shots in every-ones arms. Populations worldwide being used as Human Experiments. To cut costs and time to add continuous wealth to Big Tech, Big Pharma and multistakeholder Corporations.

IA 2030- Reach high equitable immunization coverage at national level and in all districts

I personally believe that when COVID19 Mandates finish, this is only the segment, a snippet of a much larger picture.  The deployment of further severe restrictions in our sustainable futuristic world of UN Agenda 2030.

The public, protestors need to address UN Agenda 2030 to stop, halt all these pre-planned totalitarian controls that will be deployed when the next virus, pathogen is introduced.

Under the veil of COVID19 the UN /WEF goals are being hastily fast tracked, accelerated. This is a framework for Corporate Action. UN-International Laws.. WEF – Multstakeholder Capital Corporations.

UN Global Strategy of Vaccines is not going away,  it plays a huge part of UN Agenda 2030 to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.

NOTE: PLEASE CLICK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE THIS WILL LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO ON THEIS IMPORTANT SUBJECT MATTER

 

 

 

...

HARNESSING PERSONAL INFORMATION ACCELERATING UN AGENDA 2030 GLOBAL GOALS

Have you a Social Credit Score, you do not even know about yet?

Have you heard of China’s Social Credit System?., Most people have. Every country in the world is being invaded by a  Chinese communist type social credit system.  Not just businesses but individuals. The system I have eluding to is the Economic, Social, Governance (SG) Score points.

An ESG system that keeps track of all sheep like cattle going to the sale yards.

ESG scoring is used b y banks, lending institutions worldwide to assess investments and to determine risks. The risk taking focuses on sustainability. The global goal is to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 and its global sustainable goals.

Fourteen of those sustainable UN Agenda 2030 goals include the UN Global Strategy Of Vaccine (The Decade of Vaccines 2030-2030) Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. (Reported UN Documentation word for word)

Therefore it is creditable to be concerned  when it comes to mandating of vaccines (Jabs) are reported to cease soon by Jacinda Ardern, then we must considers will these severe restrictions and mandates return in the future when WhO decide to introduce another pandemic into the world.

Note: UN Agenda 2030 global development goals are not going away, neither is the UN Global Strategy for Vaccines to leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. The Decade of Vaccines 2020-2030 introduced 2019 prior to the COVID19 Pandemic.

ESG Scoring violates intrudes on peoples personal privacy and is shared with other parties. Includes a higher risk of your personal information being hacked and used by cyber criminals.

NOTE: PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK WITHIN THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO ON THIS IMPORTANT SUBJECT MATTER.

...

TELE-HEALTH IS HERE TO STAY, WHAT’S THE RISK TO YOUR HEALTH AND WELLBEING?

It is a fact there are many concerns, issues as to the hasty increasing of Tele-Health worldwide.  In New Zealand like all other countries it was introduced under the veil of COVID19, as a no-contact measures.

There are huge ethical concerns as to Tele-Health for example cyber attacks, personal privacy issues, doctor patient relationships being put at risk. Misdiagnosis of patients health problems etc.,

The Journal Of Medical Internet Research shows concerns about the ethical challenges around medicine and health. The blending of medicine and healthcare with E-Commerce. They state that “The practice of medicine is steeply rooted in a covenant of trust among patients, physicians and society. The patient – doctor relationship maybe at risk, that this could be a pitfall when it comes to Tele-Health otherwise known as Virtual Health.

Ethical issues have been reported as to insufficient clinical information when it comes to communication between patient and doctor, broken communication, inaccurate and unclear reporting. Also security of personal health information that is maintained in electronic form. Also patient safety, health and integrity of patient data.

Tech malfunctions, cyber attacks, the internet going down what happens then?

Of course we all know that cyber attacks happen but since the increase in Tele-Health cyber attacks have increased globally.

Our own Health System in New Zealand has been cyber attacked. 5th July 2021 RNZ Through OIA Requests reported that New Zealands DHBs were refusing to release reviews done by their cyber security systems seven weeks after the Waikato DHB were cyber attacked

There was a blanket refusal to let public know where their personal patient info had been stolen in this ransomware attack.

Patients personal data was on the dark web, and there was a risk that this data could be put up for sale by the identity thieves.

RNZ tried to find out from 20 DHBs across the country what they are doing about the cyber threat. They asked for copies of minutes from DHB Risk and Assurance Committee meetings. Referring to risks, attacks etc

RNZ in another article reported 14 cyber attacks. Cyber security consultants  described how sophisticated AI hacking tools are probing the internet all the time for vulnerabilities

So what has the Government done, what has DHB done to keep hospital and their employees  personal information free of cyber attacks.?

An annual report was not  done in 2020 by the National Cyber Policy Office, Dept of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, they blamed this on COVID. The next report to be end of 2022.

RNZ reported 25th May 2021. A group who reported responsibility for the DHB Cyber Attack had sent an email saying it has personal information of patients and employees.

Media organizations were sent the email with hijacked information. This was referred to Police through RNZ

RNZ  Reporter Phil Pennington reviewed the documents to see if they were genuine, told Checkpoint there were dozens of files within files

That appeared to include recent data on DHB Staff members, financial records, contracts and complaints, as well as sensitive patient information. He said there is a lot of information

Files included screenshots identifying 100’s of patients and staff, some individual records, some documents that spelled out diagnoses, medical information.

RNZ limited the information, confined it as to confidentiality and privacy best interests of those that were affected by the cyber attack

Vimal Kumar said that these hackers cannot be trusted  “that they will not make copies and they will just delete all the data once they have the ransom. Kumar is a Waikato Computer Senior Science Lecturer at Waikato University

He said the hackers could sell the data to other cyber criminals and it could be used to scam the victims

Check Point Research (CPR) today reports that from mid-2020 throughout 2021, there has been an upwards trend in the number of cyber-attacks. This trend reached an all-time high at the end of the year, peaking to 925 cyber attacks a week per organization, globally

10th September 2020 -Targeted cyberattacks on telehealth vendors skyrocketed . https://www.healthcaredive.com › …10 March2020 — As telehealth usage surged as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, so did targeted cyberattacks on telehealth providers, according to a new report from cybersecurity ratings firm SecurityScorecard

The pandemic and resulting regulatory changes resulted in snowballing telehealth use beginning in March, as patients avoided doctors’ offices and hospitals for non-emergent health concerns, leery of potential virus transmission. As a result, telehealth providers have experienced an almost exponential surge in targeted cyberattacks, according to the new report

Surveillance on the general public is significantly increasing as is the dictatorship of digital ID.  It’s becoming much more difficult to keep your personal information secure, especially from a totalitatarian government that wants complete control over mass populations lives, here in New Zealand and elsewhere globally.

Jacinda Ardern and her political cronies in the toilet bowl of Wellington did their deal with the World Economif forum where the New Zealand population are being used as AI Digital guineapigs to advance this global tyranny.  Tele-Health is just another controlling mechanism, again lessoning human contact, putting peoples lives at risk

PLEASE NOTE: GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE AND CLICK THE ARROW TO LINK TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT.

IF YOU HAVE NOT YET SIGNED UP TO THIS WEBSITE I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU DO SO NOW.  THANK YOU…CAROL SAKEY

...