Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

RUDOLF STEINER SCHOOLS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE UN ‘UNESCO’ AS UNESCO ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS  ‘Rudolf Steiner -Waldorf Schools.

Here is some background history on Rudolf Steiner Schools. Steiner Schools are built on the philosophy and the founding of anthroposophy. The first school was opened in response to Emil Molt the owner, managing director of the  Waldorf Astoria Cigarette Company in Stuttgart Germany. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union Waldorf (Steiner ) Schools began to proliferate in Central & Eastern Europe, many walso opened in Asia and in particular in China

UNESCO (UN Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organization of the UN) support, promote Steiner (Waldorf) Schools. Waldorf is Steiner Schools. Many UN Nation States report the ideals, ethical principles of the Waldorf-Steiner School movement corresponds to UNESCO. UNESCO sponsored an exhibition on these schools at the 44th Education Congress in Geneva

Steiner-Waldorf report that ‘the Indigenous Waldorf Education is fully recognized and supported by  the UN (UNESCO)  Inclusive Waldorf schools today: what can we build on and what is necessary in the 21st century? The self-governing Waldorf school intended by Steiner offers the framework for implementing inclusion, enabling a participatory, open-minded education for children and adolescents in the 21st century . It is reported that UNESCO Associated Network of Schools links Educational institutions worldwide around one global common goal. Supporting international intercultural dialogue in the minds of children and young people. This is described as ‘Sustainable Developmental and Quality Education.

The Freunde der Erziehungskunst  *Our ambition is to invite Waldorf Schools worldwide to become part of the UNESCO network as UNESCO Associated Schools (ASP network) as there are many commonalities in the ideals and values of UNESCO and the practice in Waldorf Schools.   *We would like to implement a network of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools to connect the Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide, to exchange experiences, knowledge and good practices with schools and communities. You can find a list of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide. Stating the following:-

*We take part in initiatives of the UNESCO e.g. UNESCO’s Futures of Education initiative that aims to rethink education and shape the future. The initiative is catalyzing a global debate on how knowledge, education and learning need to be reimagined in a world of increasing complexity, uncertainty, and precarity.                      *With the international students campaign Waldorf-One-World-Day, the Freunde der Erziehungskunst established a project that contributes to the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the related 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  Steiner School philosophy of Anthroposophy is a spiritual philosophy; not a religion. https://www.waldorf-salzburg.at/ – Waldorf Campus Salzburg – Rudolf Steiner Schule © 2024)

https://schools2030.org/  Catalyzing School-Driven Holistic Learning Innovations to Achieve SDG4 by 2030. Schools2030 launched in 2020 and works in over 1000 government schools and community learning centres across ten countries: Schools2030 is collecting data from assessments, through our evaluation work with technical partners, and through our research projects, to build a body of evidence that can inform teaching practices and policy-decisions the world over. All Schools2030 methodologies, toolkits and data are/will be made freely available on our website to support transformative education agendas across the world. (https://schools2030.org/)

Are Steiner Schools inclusively entering  Universal Education 2030???  UN Agenda 2030 Education last year did not  match up with what the Steiner School curriculum in NZ , however both the Universal Education 2030 (UN) like Steiner Schools do both follow a spiritual type guidance.. an enlightenment rather than a Christian religious format???? Eeem I suspect that UNESCO is trying to infiltrate, embed itself in the Steiner School movement worldwide. ??? (A guess-estimate)

RESEARCHER: Cassie

WakeUpNZ

...

Uncategorized Blog Posts View all Categories

Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

RUDOLF STEINER SCHOOLS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE UN ‘UNESCO’ AS UNESCO ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS  ‘Rudolf Steiner -Waldorf Schools.

Here is some background history on Rudolf Steiner Schools. Steiner Schools are built on the philosophy and the founding of anthroposophy. The first school was opened in response to Emil Molt the owner, managing director of the  Waldorf Astoria Cigarette Company in Stuttgart Germany. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union Waldorf (Steiner ) Schools began to proliferate in Central & Eastern Europe, many walso opened in Asia and in particular in China

UNESCO (UN Cultural, Scientific and Educational Organization of the UN) support, promote Steiner (Waldorf) Schools. Waldorf is Steiner Schools. Many UN Nation States report the ideals, ethical principles of the Waldorf-Steiner School movement corresponds to UNESCO. UNESCO sponsored an exhibition on these schools at the 44th Education Congress in Geneva

Steiner-Waldorf report that ‘the Indigenous Waldorf Education is fully recognized and supported by  the UN (UNESCO)  Inclusive Waldorf schools today: what can we build on and what is necessary in the 21st century? The self-governing Waldorf school intended by Steiner offers the framework for implementing inclusion, enabling a participatory, open-minded education for children and adolescents in the 21st century . It is reported that UNESCO Associated Network of Schools links Educational institutions worldwide around one global common goal. Supporting international intercultural dialogue in the minds of children and young people. This is described as ‘Sustainable Developmental and Quality Education.

The Freunde der Erziehungskunst  *Our ambition is to invite Waldorf Schools worldwide to become part of the UNESCO network as UNESCO Associated Schools (ASP network) as there are many commonalities in the ideals and values of UNESCO and the practice in Waldorf Schools.   *We would like to implement a network of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools to connect the Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide, to exchange experiences, knowledge and good practices with schools and communities. You can find a list of Waldorf UNESCO Associated Schools worldwide. Stating the following:-

*We take part in initiatives of the UNESCO e.g. UNESCO’s Futures of Education initiative that aims to rethink education and shape the future. The initiative is catalyzing a global debate on how knowledge, education and learning need to be reimagined in a world of increasing complexity, uncertainty, and precarity.                      *With the international students campaign Waldorf-One-World-Day, the Freunde der Erziehungskunst established a project that contributes to the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the related 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  Steiner School philosophy of Anthroposophy is a spiritual philosophy; not a religion. https://www.waldorf-salzburg.at/ – Waldorf Campus Salzburg – Rudolf Steiner Schule © 2024)

https://schools2030.org/  Catalyzing School-Driven Holistic Learning Innovations to Achieve SDG4 by 2030. Schools2030 launched in 2020 and works in over 1000 government schools and community learning centres across ten countries: Schools2030 is collecting data from assessments, through our evaluation work with technical partners, and through our research projects, to build a body of evidence that can inform teaching practices and policy-decisions the world over. All Schools2030 methodologies, toolkits and data are/will be made freely available on our website to support transformative education agendas across the world. (https://schools2030.org/)

Are Steiner Schools inclusively entering  Universal Education 2030???  UN Agenda 2030 Education last year did not  match up with what the Steiner School curriculum in NZ , however both the Universal Education 2030 (UN) like Steiner Schools do both follow a spiritual type guidance.. an enlightenment rather than a Christian religious format???? Eeem I suspect that UNESCO is trying to infiltrate, embed itself in the Steiner School movement worldwide. ??? (A guess-estimate)

RESEARCHER: Cassie

WakeUpNZ

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

SILENCING SCIENCE IN NEW ZEALAND

SILENCING SCIENCE  SHAUN HENDY

https://www.bwb.co.nz/books/silencing-science?srsltid=AfmBOoqXNQ6ayh42KQpDVHOhLhHupy5vxmgUuKPAYXgxyRmoK0ignPIa

The nuclear meltdown at Fukushima … the Fonterra botulism scare … the Christchurch earthquakes – in all these recent crises the role played by scientists has been under the spotlight.

What is the first duty of scientists in a crisis – to the government, to their employer, or to the wider public desperate for information? And what if these different objectives clash?

In this penetrating BWB Text, leading scientist Shaun Hendy finds that in New Zealand, the public obligation of the scientist is often far from clear and that there have been many disturbing instances of scientists being silenced. Experts who have information the public seeks, he finds, have been prevented from speaking out. His own experiences have led him to conclude that New Zealanders have few scientific institutions that feel secure enough to criticise the government of the day.

https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/04-11-2016/science-experts-waikato-jacqueline-rowarth

Are New Zealand’s scientific experts really dead – or just resting?

 

Shaun Hendy

Guest writer

The row over Jacqueline Rowarth’s strange suggestion that the Waikato River is one of the world’s five cleanest reveals a need for more scientists to be heard in public, not fewer, writes Shaun Hendy.

In post-Brexit Britain, failure to heed the warnings of economists on the risks of leaving the EU has spawned many a thinkpiece on the death of the expert. Indeed, experts might be forgiven for ending it all after a British scientist who pointed out that the moon causes the tides was called out by a UKIP MP and accused of fear-mongering. Britain may have once ruled the waves, but now finds itself ruled by folk who find waves a little bit confusing.

Here in New Zealand, we know full well that the tides are caused by the decision of the previous Labour government to extend daylight saving. And with minds untroubled by tidal forces, Kiwis have had time to contemplate a deeper question:

Why are our rivers full of shit?

Traditionally Kiwis worry less about whether their experts are dead than whether they left a forwarding address before they moved to Australia. Sure enough, when more than 5,000 people became sick thanks to the contamination of Havelock North’s water supply in August, our experts made themselves rather scarce.

When Hawke’s Bay Regional Council chair, Fenton Wilson, was asked by Radio New Zealand about his Council’s reports concerning the woefully unhealthy state of the nearby Tukituki river, he said “I don’t have any of that information to hand.” When it was put to him that recent flooding may have driven contaminated water into one of the town’s aquifers, Wilson speculated that “speculation is not helpful at this time”.

Did we really not have any scientists who could speak knowledgably on whether contaminated surface water could have gotten into Havelock North’s groundwater?

Remarkably, science confirms that remnant populations of such scientists do still reside in New Zealand. They work for the government, and as I wrote in Silencing Science earlier this year, they are the sorts of experts we almost never hear from.

Check them out in happier times, speculating wildly at their Te Papa workshop last year on “Groundwater-Surface Water interaction”. Unfortunately the last thing a government scientist is allowed to do is to speak – I mean, speculate – about something that actually affects the public.

And who needs an expert when helpful prime ministers can always find you another with a different point of view?

Cue Jacqueline Rowarth, the newly minted chief scientist at our Environmental Protection Authority, who, before taking the job, was telling the public that the Waikato River is “one of the five cleanest rivers in the world”

Rowarth, previously a professor of agribusiness at the University of Waikato, was hired by the EPA to use her “expertise to explain our science, so people can have trust and confidence in the decisions we make”, according to EPA chief executive Dr Allan Freeth.

This may have sounded like a good plan at the time, but Rowarth’s stance on water quality has had other experts increasingly alarmed.

New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society president Marc Schallenberg said that Rowarth’s “comments concerning the condition of the Waikato River are not only false, but distract from the important work being done to improve water quality in New Zealand”.

Bryce Cooper, a water quality expert at NIWA, said, “Water quality in its [the Waikato River’s] lower reaches ranks in the bottom half of 500 sites nationally for key indicators such as nitrogen, phosphorus, E.coli (a measure of faecal contamination) and water clarity.”

If you are predisposed to think that the science of tides was fabricated 400 years ago in preparation for Project Fear, then you may also be tempted to dismiss these water quality experts as having a vested interest in spreading alarm in order to keep themselves employed.

But if you actually want to be better informed about our rivers, you do need to hear from scientists like Cooper and Schallenberg – and, yes, Rowarth too. Because this is how science works. Scientists make claims, present their evidence, and wait for the judgement of their peers.

Better that we know how Rowarth views the evidence than not. Now those views are in the open, they can be scrutinised and critiqued.

Rowarth herself has now gone quiet, joining the ranks of New Zealand’s silent scientists. When Rowarth was asked to comment on her views by Radio New Zealand, the EPA replied, saying, “it would be inappropriate for her to comment on statements she made while employed in a previous role.”

So New Zealand’s experts aren’t yet extinct. Not quite.

On a calm day, if you listen very carefully, you can almost make out what they are saying.

The Spinoff’s political coverage is powered by the generous support of our members. If you value what we do and believe in the importance of independent and freely accessible journalism – tautoko mai, donate today.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/science/79716207/the-high-public-cost-of-muzzling-scientists  The high public cost of muzzling scientists

Shaun Hendy

May 06, 2016

Workers decontaminate a building near the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011. At the time, New Zealand government agencies responsible for nuclear research refused to talk to the media, leaving people in the dark about whether the country faced any risks.KYODO / Not-For-Syndication

OPINION: To whom is the first duty of a scientist in a crisis – to the politicians who fund them, the employer who pays them, or the wider public, desperate for information? In the course of writing my new book, Silencing Science, I have found that scientists’ duty to the public often comes last.

The Canterbury and Christchurch earthquakes, for example, put New Zealand science on the spot. Cantabrians wanted to know why them? Why now? And what might happen next?

These were not easy questions for scientists to answer. There was a lot that wasn’t known about the geological structures that lay below the city, and even in the best of times, the forecasting of aftershocks is an uncertain business.

But it was much more difficult than it should have been. Scientists at Crown Research Institute GNS Science were focused on briefing officials to ensure that government had the best information. Others found themselves challenged by officials when they tried to disseminate aftershock forecasts, lest they undermine the recovery. Communications were supposed to be channelled through the joint emergency operations centre, but science had a low priority and the centre became a bottleneck.

These problems extend well beyond the Canterbury earthquakes.

After explosions at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, Kiwis were left without expert advice on the risks from radioactive fallout. Our government agencies responsible for nuclear research refused to talk to the media, only issuing terse written statements days after the event that radiation would not reach our shores.

In the days following Fonterra’s product recall after its botulism scare, the country’s leading food safety experts were muzzled because of the commercial risks, leaving the public in the dark.

In 2014, more than 150 New Zealand scientists confirmed in a survey that they had been prevented from talking to the media by their employers or for fearing of losing their funding.

Scientists at our Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) are particularly vulnerable. NIWA, the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research, refuses to provide advice on climate change policy, but at the same time consults for the oil and gas industry. “How as a CRI scientist can I ever speak out against an industry that my CRI serves? I just cannot,” wrote one scientist under the protection of anonymity.

Scientists who do speak out can find themselves the victims of misinformation campaigns orchestrated by corporate lobbyists. Some are even criticised by their own colleagues for violating unwritten rules that govern who can speak for science.

The silence of New Zealand’s scientists means that the government freely ignores the advice of its own science advisor. Sir Peter Gluckman, the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, has found that his advice falls on deaf ears when it stands to hurt the profits of big business.

The Royal Society of New Zealand, our peak scientific body, is paid to advise the government. When one of the Society’s expert panels recently recommended that the government take urgent action to reduce carbon emissions, Climate Change Minister, Paula Bennett, simply said: “I hope it sparks more innovation and discussions on how we achieve this.”

And its advice is as easily silenced as it is dismissed. Last year one Royal Society advisory panel was shut down before it could report at the request of the government

The Prime Minister has a science advisor. I believe it is time that the public had one too. This is why in Silencing Science, I call for New Zealand to establish a Parliamentary Commission for Science.

It would be modelled on Dr Jan Wright’s Parliamentary Commission for the Environment. It would be independent of the government of the day, and would have the power to investigate claims of scientific misconduct, while protecting whistle-blowers.

Unlike the role that Sir Peter Gluckman has played, the Commission’s mandate would not extend to matters of science funding and policy. This would allow it to maintain the trust of scientists and the organisations they work for.

The Commission would have the responsibility and resources to ensure that the public and Parliament was well advised in times of crisis. It would also procure advice from the science community on matters of long-term importance for the well being of New Zealanders, such as public health and climate. It would challenge the government where it saw scientific advice being ignored.

The public is demanding greater transparency from the science community, something that our current scientific institutions cannot, or will not, provide. A Commission for Science would forge a new relationship between scientists and an increasingly frustrated public.

A Commission will ensure that science is silent no more.

Shaun Hendy is the Director of Te Pūnaha Matatini, a Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems and Networks, and a Professor of Physics at the University of Auckland

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/scientists-gagged-by-funding-fears-says-professor/XQMFULP6TOMVPKCDF4CX5Q3NYE/?c_id=1&objectid=11635689

A prominent professor says New Zealand needs a commission for science as many scientists are being gagged.

Professor Shaun Hendy, a recipient of the Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize, this week launches his book Silencing Science, in which he lays out concerns in the scientific community

VA prominent professor says New Zealand needs a commission for science as many scientists are being gagged.

Professor Shaun Hendy, a recipient of the Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize, this week launches his book Silencing Science, in which he lays out concerns in the scientific community

Journalists were finding it harder to get comment from scientists, he said, and scientists in many cases were constrained by strict media policy or fear of jeopardising funding.

“Scientists anxiously watch the Government’s Budget announcements every year, and many worry that speaking out or challenging Government policy will put science funding at risk,” he told the Herald.

His book follows a 2014 report by the New Zealand Association of Scientists, which he formerly presided over, that found 40 per cent of the scientists it surveyed said they had been prevented from making public comment on a controversial issue due to policy or fear of losing funding.

Professor Hendy claimed Crown research institutes were increasingly under pressure to find private funding, so had tight, corporate-like policies filtering what scientists could say to journalists.

“This is not to say that publicly employed scientists shouldn’t work with the private sector, but in a science community that is as thinly spread as New Zealand’s, it can mean that in times of crisis we simply run out of experts who are free to speak.”

He proposed a Commission for Science, responsible to Parliament rather than the Government, which could investigate complaints from whistle-blowers and increase transparency

But Science and Innovation Minister Steven Joyce rejected the notion scientists were being muzzled, saying the only potential issue was where contracted research was involved.

“In general terms, you’d have to say New Zealand has a very robust scientific communication environment; there are lots of issues that scientists speak on, as they should, and they get the opportunity to do so.”

In discussions with the research community about new potential guidelines around public engagement, the Royal Society of New Zealand found only a few comments around constraints, president Professor Richard Bedford said.

Mr Joyce said a commission was not needed, arguing the interests of science and scientists were already served by the democratic process

The Prime Minister’s chief science adviser, Sir Peter Gluckman, said New Zealand had a strong science advisory system, with groups such as the Parliamentary Library and the Royal Society, which he described as “fiercely independent” of Government.

His own role was independent, he said, but was largely around providing evidence for policy, “rather than policy for science”.

“Science, policy and society is a three-way thing: science does not make policy, and in fact the worst thing we can do as scientists is exhibit hubris and think we know what policy-making is all about.”

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/gagging-science-its-worldwide/2SZHMUKY66W6LN2KZZVWKS7PRY/?c_id=1&objectid=11652351

Gagging science: ‘It’s worldwide’

 

By Jamie Morton

Multimedia Journalist·NZ Herald·

8 Jun, 2016

Deranged’ policy has experts scared to speak up, doctor says.

Claims that New Zealand scientists are being silenced is something seen around the world, says a renowned author, doctor and outspoken science commentator visiting Auckland this year.

UK academic Ben Goldacre said concerns raised in a new book by Auckland physicist Professor Shaun Hendy – which argues many scientists feel constrained by strict media policies or fear of jeopardising funding – have popped up “all around the world”.

“In the UK, we’ve had a similar problem recently, where the Government has proposed a new policy on all science funding, where scientists won’t be allowed to lobby politicians or government with the results of their scientific research, which is obviously deranged,” said Dr Goldacre, best known for his books Bad Science and Bad Pharma.

“And obviously there are lots of individual stories of scientists having pressure put on them by funders,” he said.

“As always, I think these problems aren’t just about individual episodes where people have been silenced, and it’s not just about where somebody’s got something that might be a little bit difficult for their funder to hear, I think it’s because of a wider problem and a wider lack of respect for the importance of communicating science to the public.”

But Dr Goldacre wasn’t convinced by Professor Hendy’s suggestion in Silencing Science that the problem could be addressed by a new independent commission to represent science in policy.

“Big organisations, inevitably, are vulnerable,” he said. “They can become captured by their funders and become part of the establishment, just like the people they think they are going to come out and fight against.”

He believed the benefits of a more science-literate public, something the Government was pushing through various programmes, was “absolutely enormous”.

When somebody understands how to critically appraise, how to critically review, a piece of scientific research or a claim that is being put in front of them, then they can make much better, informed choices themselves as a citizen, about their own healthcare [and] about the policies around them.”

Asked why so many people reject scientific consensus on matters such as vaccination and climate change, he suspected the reasons varied.

“We have to accept that there are people who actually don’t care about facts,” he said. “They would make the rest of our lives a little bit easier, or less frustrating, if they could at least acknowledge that fact openly, and obviously none of them ever do.”

Dr Goldacre described himself as an “equal opportunities quack-buster” who took on anyone who misrepresented statistics, whether they were journalists, politicians, “herbal remedy peddlers” or researchers.

At present, he is running a campaign to stop drug companies and academics from withholding the results of clinical trials, and another that calls out journals for misreporting the results of clinical trials.

Dr Ben Goldacre on …

  • Bad science in different countries: “It’s a bit like when you hear crappy eastern European pop trance music, and you say, ‘this is exactly the same as Italian pop trance, and French trance – it’s just that the words are a little bit different, in a different language’.”
  • Appreciating science: “If you don’t understand science, then you are denying yourself access to all of the most significant intellectual achievements of the past two centuries of human history.”
  • People who reject scientific evidence: “Everybody knows, from having arguments in the pub, or over dinner, that there are people who just don’t care what the facts are.”
  • Climate sceptics: “What you have is a middle-aged person who chooses to ignore the scientific evidence on climate change, and who is inflicting harm on people they will never meet, 50, 100, or 150 years from now.”
  • Ben Goldacre will be speaking at The Mercury Theatre in Auckland on September 24. For tickets, visit www.eventfinda.co.nz

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

WHAT’S THE CONNECTION WITH NZ AND THE PALESTIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION?

WHAT’S THE CONNECTION WITH NZ AND THE PALESTIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION?

 

The PFLP (Popular Front of the Liberation of Palestine) is a well known Islamic Pan Arab Socialist  Marxist Leninist Terrorist Organization one of which sits under the umbrella of the Palestinian Liberation Front, responsible for untold civilian deaths  within and outside Israels borders. The PFLP on their Telegram page have stated they participated in the 7th October 2023 horrific attacks, murders, tortures, mutilations on Israeli citizens, men-women, children and babies

 

The PFLP are determined that there is a One State Solution ‘From The River To The Sea’. The PFLP want to establish a Communist Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital. The PFLP are largely based in Gaza and the West Bank of Palestine they also operate in Lebanon and Syria

 

This video shares with the viewer the connection between the PFLP and a Far Left Socialist Group in New Zealand.  And the PFLP connection to the Red Army and a Global Revolution.

 

RESEARCHER: Cassie

https://wakeupnz.org

 

RUMBLE  7TH November 2024

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

NZ’S CONNECTION TO THE (PFLP) POPULAR FRONT OF THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE – SOCIALIST MARXIST PAN ARAB ISLAMIST TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

The PFLP is a well known Islamic Pan Arab Socialist  Marxist Leninist Terrorist Organization one of which sits under the umbrella of the Palestinian Liberation Front, responsible for untold civilian deaths  within and outside Israels borders. The PFLP on their Telegram page have stated they participated in the 7th October 2023 horrific attacks, murders, tortures, mutilations on Israeli citizens, men-women, children and babies.

Those that participated with HAMAS were various Islamic Palestinian terrorist movements. On that atrocious day 7th October 2023 it was reported that 6,000 terrorists participated in this attack inside Israeli territory.

The PFLP (Popular Front For The Liberation of Palestine) Their brutal demands are from the River Jorden to the Mediterranean Sea will become one Palestinian owned territory.  (A One State Solution). The PFLP want to establish a Communist Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital. The PFLP are largely based in Gaza and the West Bank of Palestine they also operate in Lebonon and Syria

The PFLP was founded after the 6 Day War in 1967. The PFLP  have links to far left militant groups across the world and was involved in the Second Intifada from 2000-2005 when they carried out suicide operations, launched multiply joint operations participating with other Palestinian Islamist terrorist groups. In July 2022 its was reported that the PFLP along with HAMAS and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were collaborating together to create a  Palestinian National Front, cooperating rebuilding the PLO

The PFLP target Israeli Govt, military, Israeli civilians, have been involved in large scale, high visibility armed attacks on civilian commercial airlines within and outside Israels borders, thus impacting on passengers that were from other countries. They have conducted bombings, fire mortars, rockets, surface to air missiles,  explosive devices, suicide vests and gun fire, suicide vests,  etc to target  Israel.

The PFLP Declaration of World War 1971. A film was produced by Palestine-Fils titled 1971 Red Army-PFLP Declaration Of World War.  A published article was authored by Duke University referring to thus namely ‘Global Revolution starts with Palestine, the Red Army’s Alliance with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine PFLP Article dated 1st December 2023

The Duke University article examines the development of the PFLP and the JRA (Japanese Red Army). Refers to the 1971 feil ‘SEIGUN’  RED ARMY/PFLP: Declaration of World War 1971’. With statements, interviews conducted by the media with members of the JRA (Japanese Red Army). Thus tracing  Palestine at the centre of a ‘global revolution, underpinning the direct actions of the PLO- PFLP Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Refers to the FFLP being rooted in ‘anti- colonialism’

The Japanese Red Army and the PFLP history goes back to the commercial airliner flight from Rome to Lodi Airport in Israel. Where the JRA and PFLP took guns, grenades from their luggage and shot at crowds in Lodi Airport. The JRA are a Lebonon based breakaway faction of a far left Japanese student group  of the Red Army Faction (RAF) namely called the Unuited Red Army in 1972.

In 1971 some of the members of the   Red Army Faction  with  members of the  PFLP were allies alleged  to be preparing for a ‘global revolution’. The JRA and PFLP demonstrating how inter-Asian linkages among the Far Left could participate without needing State Actors to attain their shared goal of implementing a ‘global revolution because of their shared ideology

On the 1st November 2021 the UN Security Council stated that the PFLP, a murderous terror organization, has been responsible for countless terrorist attacks against Israelis and other nationals since its creation 1st November 2021. The UN Security Council described that the PFLP operate an an organizational & military apparatus which include a network of civilian institutions, raise and funnel donations from overseas in order to fund PFLP activities at all levels, including their acts of terror

The PFLP act under the guise of humanitarian aid and human rights activities receiving million of ero’s of funds stemming primarily from Govts & State Members of the United Nations. On the 8th October 1997 the US State Dept designated the PFLP as a terrorist organization and again on the 30th October 2001 placed an order on them for the purpose of financial sanctions

The PFLP does not recognize Israel as a State (full stop) The PFLP participate with HAMAS and  Islamist terrorist factions.The PFLP is designated as a terrorist organization in Japan across the EU, the US and Canada. The PFLP remains one of the most active radical leftist socialist Islamic Pan Arab organizations will into the 21st Century.

The PFLP is rarely if ever mentioned by any NZ Government MPs in the House or by other Government officials even the UN during the HAMAS attacks, they do not refer to those other Palestinian Factions that participate. PFLP Telegram Channel describe and embrace that they participated in the 7th October 2023 horrendous attacks inside Israels territory.

What are the PFLP’s connection to NZ? For starters they are of the same Socialist Far Left Marxist Ideolofy as the now debunked Socialist Workers Party in Christchurch. They are also of the same ideology of  some of those members from the Workers Socialist Party that are now influential in the Canterbury Socialist Society. And have  direct connections to far leftist Byron Clark of the Socialist Workers Party.

Byron Clark  was an editor, influential member of the workers Socialist Party in Christchurch, was once a candidate for the Mayoral position in Christchurch, but failed miserably. The Workers Socialist Party launched a solidarity Campaign for the PFLP Terrorist Org.,

The Workers Socialist Party advertised they were raising funds, accepting  donations, selling Tee shirts emblazoned with ‘Resistance Is Not Terrorism’ across them. Also their poster girl was no other than Leila  Khaled  PFLP terrorist fully involved with armed hijackings of commercial airliners. They produced poster with Leila Khaled’s image on them. Leila Khaled was the Workers Socialist Party’s Poster Girl.

It was reported in the Workers Socialist Party’s publication of Spark that they had raised $1,000 to be sent directly to the PFLP. Byron Clark was an influential person in the Workers Party along with others including  Hopkinson and Edmundson. (The Workers Socialist Party was a far left activist group with PFLP terrorist connections)

The Spark Workers Party Socialist publication reading “The Marxist Red & Purple perspective on the Queer Liberation in NZ< is to be delivered to the Marist Conference 2010. And the PFLP Solidarity Campaign (Mike Walker) A discussion on Population controls the answer to climate change took place between Workers Party Member Byron Clark and John Robinson a former academic whom researched the rising population. The PFLP campaign got off to a good start selling Tee Shirts, raffles and SPARK publications.

In an interview Byron Clark later in trying to cover his arse said  “As far as I know the PFLP never actually received any money, and the NZ State never actually challenged  the fundraiser” (So it did happen) He added  “ However this has not stopped the far rights from finding the advertisement for the fundraiser in the groups magazine Spark ‘that claimed the  fundraiser money was  going directly to PFLP’

Edmundson and Hopkinson were influential members of the Socialist Workers Party they later became key players of the  Canterbury Socialist Society. They  again re-launched the campaign to support the  PFLP Terrorist Org., Byron  Clark authored the book  FEAR focusing on the so called Alt-Right of NZ, naming several public voices that opposed Ardern’s Narratives. (including myself and others)

I started producing You Tube Videos in 2018 when I objected to NZ signing the UN Global Compact of Migration that’s when Byron Clark started targeting me and my video’s and continued to do so. He has written articles in the propaganda machine run workshops in a couple of universities in NZ on the Alt Right of NZ.

Byron Clarks next Disinformation project is Disinformation Smart Cities and the Far Right. SDGs UN Agenda 2030.  Revisiting Workers Socialist publication ‘Spark’ and Byron Clark. In the text of one publication includes the ‘ Queer Liberation of New Zealand, and the Marxism 2010 Conference Report  (The Park 2010 cost $1) Put an end to all Western Military Alliances. Open Borders for Migrants

Byron Clark wrote an open letter to the Minister of Immigration requesting that Posie Parker not be allowed to enter NZ describing her as an Anti-Trans  calling her a Neo Nazi. (Article NZ Herald 22nd March 2023)  Clark then started running Climate Change Disinformation those that believe that Science is not settled were once more to be stalked. Yet another disinformation campaign by the far left.

Mandy Henk Librarian, Teacher and Byron Clark teaming up on their Climate Change Disinformation Night School under the Non Profit Tohatoha.  Internet NZ was funding Tohatoha  they stopped funding this in September this year, so that was the end of that. InternetNZ still funds other Disinformation projects thought.

Byron Clarks latest Disinformation target the ALT RIGHT- FAR RIGHT the ‘conspiracy theorists’ Clark writes:-                              “Conspiracy theorists’ opposition to urban planning can seem bizarre, but it’s consistent with an ethos that embraces climate change denial and distrust of supranational organizations.”

RESEARCHER: Cassie

WakeUpNZ NOW

 

LINKS:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/byron-clark-an-open-letter-to-the-minister-of-immigration-about-anti-trans-activist-posie-parker/ZPTRWH4ZDJHOHCE6JTSYIFRK5Y/

(https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/18-01-2024/fear-of-a-15-minute-city)

(3 pages pdf  https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ISRAELLETTER.S.2021.915_011121.pdf)

https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/new-zealand/spark-237.pdf  14 Pages

https://thespinoff.co.nz/science/08-03-2024/the-next-big-target-for-disinformation-climate-change

https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/new-zealand/spark-237.pdf

https://read.dukeupress.edu/cssaame/article/43/3/358/384021/Global-Revolution-Starts-with-PalestineThe

https://www.state.gov/taking-joint-actions-against-international-pflp-fundraiser/

(https://palestinefilms.org/en/Film/1971/Red-Army-PFLP-Declaration-of-World-War-1971) The Duke University Press (https://read.dukeupress.edu/cssaame/article/43/3/358/384021/Global-Revolution-Starts-with-PalestineThe) Global Revolution Starts with Palestine: The Japanese Red Army’s Alliance with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine   Article dated 1st December 2023

...