CORRUPTION OF TE TIRITI O WAITANGI AND THE MASKED SILENCE ‘INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’

In the 1960’a Maasai radical activist (Moringe Ole Parkipuny) former member of Tanzanian Parliament coined the phrase ‘Indigenous People’ . August 1989 he was the first African so called ‘Indigenous Person’ (A self-determined Indigenous Person) to address the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations in Geneva. He laid the foundations for the UN 2007 adopted UN Declaration for Indigenous Peoples Rights (UNDRIP)

An article written more recently in the New Yorker Magazine by Maniv Singh wrote ‘Many groups who identify as Indigenous don’t claim to be first peoples, many who did come first don’t claim to be Indigenous’. Winston Peters recently stated that Maori are not Indigenous to NZ they come from Hawaiki, but those that self identify in NZ as Indigenous People argue “they are Indigenous People’

Many African view the term ‘Indigenous People’ as having negative connotations, that concerted radical activists call themselves Indigenous People as do their international partners. Referring to the obsessive shift in attitudes. In Africa ‘Indigenous People’ call themselves the dominant class stating they reflect the interests activities beliefs of the majority. The so called ‘Indigenous People’ of New Zealand have taken the same attitude as if they are speaking for all those people with Maori ancestry, calling them ‘Our People’, without consent or consensus.

The Parkipuny coined phrase has become an expanded dominant force used as a political, economically rewarding tool to favour one group over all others in Nation States. Thus influencing environmental legislations and Resource Management, riddled in Identity Politics of Oppression and Victimhood. Useful in character assassinating Non-Maori whom oppose their narrative by demonizing industrialization in colonies. (Back to Tribal Feudalism- Decolonize everything) INSANITY.

The re-story telling, re-imaginings of a tribal warfare being non-=existent, that those of Maori ancestry were people of the forest that lived peacefully amongst themselves. Masking, silencing the genocide in the Chatham Island of the Morori by Maori tribalism, they were easy bait being peaceful loving people. The tribal warfare  attacks, slavery, torture, cannibalism to expose these facts one would be targeted as Racist, White Supremacist even those that have Maori ancestry have exposed this and also called white supremacists too.

The so called ‘Indigenous People’ aiding the Globalist Agenda 2030 ‘Our Future’ Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age- the main actors of this massive transformation are the UN & WEF, UN Nation Governments, Globalist Elite and Iwi Elite – Corporations, Global Asset Managers, Philanthropists eg Rockefeller, Gates Foundation etc., COP 28 ‘Indigenous People are at the centre, forefront of the global transformation Agenda 2030.

Like the words ‘Partnership’ Principles they were not created by the original Maori Version of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and nor was the phase ‘Indigenous People’. How did that coined Parkipuny phrase enter New Zealand? George Manuel President of the Canadian Indian Brotherhood with a Canadian Delegation visited to NZ, this was arranged by Justin Trudeau father Pierre Trudeau in 1971. George Manuel met with Maori Politicians where discussions took place on the use of the phrase ‘Indigenous People’

George Manual and the Canadian Delegation then travelled to a university in the Northern Territories of Australia where Manuel gave a speech to Aboriginal students on ‘Indigenous People’. Travelling from one place to another, the Parkipuny coined phrase ‘Indigenous People’ expanded across the world. George Manuel then established the UN International Indigenous Peoples Council. At one UN gathering 100+ native, tribal people walked out in protest complaining they had never consented to being classed as ‘Indigenous People’

The adopted ‘self determined’ identification ‘Indigenous People’ a one label for many natives, tribes, with numerous various cultures, traditions and globally 4,000 plus different languages. George Manuel was influential in planning the UNDRIP which took many years to plan, also Maori Ngati Awa hosted the first International Conference on Indigenous Cultural & Intellectual property rights

On the drafting of the UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous People many governments actively opposed it because of legal arguments such as NZ, Canada, US and Canada. It was in 1985 that enough UN Nation States agreed to drafting the UN Declaration hence establishing a working group to draft a plan. Maori from New Zealand were involved. Moana Jackson was a chairperson at the UN in 1990. Also involved were Joe Williams, Aroha Mead the daughter of Alec Kaihau who was also involved. Nganeko Minhinnick and her brother -Alec Kaihau (A family affair you could say. However as the years went by more Maori were involved in the drafting of the UNDRIP including Aunty Pauline Tangiora.

The Non-binding UNDRIP was first adopted at New York UN Headquarters 13th September 2007 (143 countries in favour of the UNDRIP- 4 countries rejected it-Australia, Canada, US, NZ- 11 abstained). Over the years Clair Charters who has been awarded a role in the NZ Human Rights Commission, Tracy Whare, Maona Sinclair and Catherine Davis are self determined advocates of the UNDRIP the goal being to implement this in New Zealand.

So why did the Labour Govt reject the 2007 UNDRIP.? Rosemary Banks was the representative of NZ that spoke for NZ at the UN Assembly on 13th Sept 2007, she explained to the gathering why NZ opposed the UNDRIP. She referenced 4 Provisions in and 4 articles that were non compliant to NZ that NZ has difficulty with. The text of the UN Declaration being fundamentally incompatible with NZ’s Constitutional and Legal arrangements also the Treaty Of Waitangi and the principle of governing NZ for the ‘GOOD OF ALL NZ CITIZENS’

Article 26 of the UN Declaration on Lands and Resources, Article 28 on Redress (Compensation) Articles 10 and 32 on ‘Rights of Veto Over The State’ . Article 26 states that ‘Indigenous Peoples’ have the right to own, use, develop or control lands, territories they have traditionally owned, occupied, used. This means the entire country of NZ being potentially caught up in the scope of this article. Does not recognize the rights of land lawfully owned by other citizens. Indigenous People would have rights that others do not have. Does not take into account land tenures.

The whole country would fall under Article 28 of the UNDRIP on ‘Redress’ (Compensation0. Does not take into account the land occupies by others legitimately. Implies that Indigenous People have  the Right to Veto that other groups or individuals do not have. The Provisions of the UNDRIP are so fundamentally incompatible with the democratic processes of NZ as a Sovereign Nation State, with legislation and NZ’s Constitutional arrangements.

Implies Indigenous People have the Veto Rights over Democratic Legislature & National Resource Management. Implies 2 classes of citizenship. Supporters of the UNDRIP in 2007 at the UN Assembly explained the UN Declaration as being an ‘aspirational’ document, one of inspiration rather than having a legal effect. In 2010 John Key under the National Govt arranged under a veil of secrecy for Pita Sharples of the Maori Party to sign the UNDRIP at the UN. Those other UN Nations States that rejected the UNDRIP have since agreed to it.

November 21-23rd 2023 a convention took place at Auckland University with overseas guests and speakers namely ‘The Korero Constitution’ referencing the enabling of the UNDRIP into NZ’s Constitutional arrangements. Nanaia Mahuta opened the 2nd day of the convention.

As the Three Party Coalition openly talk about the ‘Principles of the Treaty Of Waitangi’, time to bring certain issues of concern, and the facts to the eyes of NZ Citizens. The original Maori Version of Te Tiriti o Waitangi did not create a ‘Partnership’ nor ‘Principles’ nor was the coined Parkipuny phrase ‘Indigenous Peoples’ created by Te Tiriti O Waitangi. Te Tiriti O Waitangi NZ’s founding document has been severely corrupted.

Recent COP 28 gathering “Indigenous People’ are at the centre, forefront of Climate Change, the Global Agenda 2030’

...

UN Declaration of Indigenous Peoples Rights Blog Posts View all Categories

WE REALLY DO NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS

I have personally interviewed vaccinators at three COVID19 Vaccination Centre’s. Each individual vaccinator was questioned “If I have a COVID19 jab will you promise I will not have a serious adverse event or die from receiving the COVID19 jab”? In total 10 vaccinators each informed me that the COVID19 Vaccine is extremely safe.

True informed consent is a process, and, as such, it requires that the health-care provider enter into a discussion that ultimately leads to the patient understanding of their options, and the risks and benefits of the alternative courses of action.

New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 states the ‘Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment. Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.
The New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 is referred to in the COVID19 Public Health Response Act Section 11– The right to refuse to undergo medical treatment.
The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights – There is no particular age at which children or young people may give informed consent under the Code.

A HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO HEALTH:
– Accessibility- non-discrimination, physical accessibility, economic accessibility (affordability), information accessibility.
– Acceptability: respectful of medical ethics and culturally appropriate, sensitive to age and gender
– Quality: scientifically and medically appropriate

All people have the Right to Self-Determination. The historical and current development of the right to self-determination on the basis of the Charter i of the \ United Nations and other instruments adopted by United Nations organs, with particular reference to the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The Charter of the United Nations expressly establishes the right to self-determination.
Guaranteeing informed consent is fundamental to achieving the enjoyment of the right to health through practices, policies and research that are respectful of autonomy, self-determination and human dignity. Safeguarding informed consent along the health-care continuum is an obligation placed on States and third parties

The concept of consent has evolved for centuries to arrive at its current meaning. In the aftermath of the Nuremberg Trials, increased international recognition of patients’ rights developed in the twentieth century, hence defining the responsibility of health-care providers and States responsibilities to the patient.

In 1947, the Nuremberg Code asserted that the voluntary consent of the human subject to medical research is necessary under all circumstances. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) further developed the Code principles and tied them to the ethical duties of physicians, as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948).
In 1994, the World Health Organization Amsterdam Declaration on Patients’ Rights required informed consent as a prerequisite for any medical intervention, guaranteeing also the right to refuse or halt medical interventions.

Informed consent is not mere acceptance of a medical intervention, but a voluntary and sufficiently informed decision, protecting the right of the patient to be involved in medical decision-making, and assigning associated duties and obligations to health-care providers. Its ethical and legal normative justifications stem from its promotion of patient autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and well-being.

I am extremely concerned that young people in New Zealand can legally consent to participating in Clinical Trials without prior parental or guardianship consent. That they can also book a COVID19 jab online, or just turn up at a COVID19 Vaccination Centre, and are not be required to provide identification of proof of age.

The randomised Pfizer Clinical Trial (Human Experiments) was of 2,260 12 – 15year olds from across America. 50% of them were jabbed with a placebo, only 1,130 actually received the COVID19 jab. This is a very tiny percentage of the population within this age group considering there are almost 17 million 12-15 year olds in America alone and only 1,130 participants were required for FDA to give consent.

COVID 19 so called vaccines are not vaccines, they are inoculations. They do not stop infection, they are an immune treatment.
I am extremely concerned for our young people who have the legal right to consent to be participants in these human trials, human experiments. (12-15yrs old).
DHB’s are trying to get schools on board for onsite vaccination clinics.

Chris Hipkins has reported that COVID19 Vaccinations for children from the age of 5years will be rolled out by the end of January 2022 as FDA have given Pfizer provisional consent for these inoculations, they are just awaiting MEDSAFE approval.

Globally populations are being controlled by a Communist Chinese type Social Credit System of Rewards and Punishments, compliant or non-compliant our freedoms, human ights, civil liberties have been severely violated, it now appears that all these Human Rights just simply, sadly disappeared. We really do not have any Human Rights.

NOTE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO.

...

NOWHERE TO RUN AND NOWHERE TO HIDE.

The Imperial Global Public-Private Corporate Governance of the Planet namely Earth. The Eco-Political Global Elite (The Green Leftist-Socialist-Communist Global Powerhouse)

The Corporate capture of global governance : The World Economic Forum – UN partnership agreement is a dangerous threat to all living beings on the earth. Digital Globalization, digital Data, digital control of global populations. A Multistakeholder business governance, nationally-globally is being played out, has been planned for years, the end is in sight. The emerging powers in this Global imperialist global governance.

A group of rising powers from the global South is effectively challenging western predominance, the hallmark of the global order over the last two centuries. CIGI’s research is built on long term transnational networking that brings together high-ranking scholars from the industrialized and the developing worlds. The redistribution of wealthy and the end of private property rights.

THIS IS TOO SAD, TOO CRUEL IT MUST NEVER BE…..
Where have all the farmers gone..long time passing.
Where have all the tradies gone…long time passing…
Where have all the small businesses gone…long time passing
Where have all our freedoms gone….long time passing.

WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND NOW

...

PUBLIC-PRIVATE CONTROL SYSTEM

The UN Secretary General and the World Economic Forum signed on June 13 a Strategic Partnership Agreement for the implementation of the 2030 agenda (SDG). Accelerated actions to UN Agenda 2030 17 lobal Development goals

17 out od 17 global goals relate to Climate Alarmism. 14 out of 17 relate to UN lobal Strategy of Vaccine 2011- 2020, and the decade of vaccine.. leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.

Jacinda Ardern boasts se as included the accelerated actions to UN Agenda 2030 into New Zealand’s domestic policy, she intends to lead other UN Nations worldwide. New Zealander’s are sitting on the edge of a very dangerous precipice

The provisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide that corporate leaders will become ‘whisper advisors’ to the heads of UN system departments, using their private access to advocate market-based profit-making ‘solutions’ to global problems while undermining real solutions

The WEF agreement with the UN, and all other forms of corporate capture, seriously undermines and erodes democratic processes worldwide.
For further information please go to the link above to my Rumble Video

...

NEW ZEALAND COVID-19 PROTECTION FRAMEWORK

On 3 December, the country will leave behind the alert level system which has been in place since early 2020 and move into the traffic light system. Jacinda Ardern said “for the most part, if you’re vaccinated, you can go about doing all the kinds of things you’d usually expect … what varies is just how large those gatherings are at different levels”. (Medical Discrimination)

Vaccination certificates would allow businesses to be able to open and operate at any level, of course businesses will want to want to increase their customer base.

RED… The red setting will allow hospitality to open with vaccine certificates, but gathering limits, physical distancing, masks and other public health measures would be used, also more track and tracing

Orange, vaccination certificates in close contact businesses, gatherings no limits on numbers of people marae, close contact businesses….

Green, places requiring vaccination certificate requirements, no limits- hospitality, wedding, places of worsip, marae, events- outdoors/ indoors..close contact businesses.

Please go to Link above which will take you to my Rumble video – giving you more information on this serious situation

...