An AI dictated future, a future in which our every move, our every word, our every relationship is trackable, traceable and data-mineable by unprecedented collaborations between government and tech giants.

It’s a future in which our every move, our every word, our every relationship is trackable, traceable and data-mineable by unprecedented collaborations between government and tech giants.

In Australia for instance, , there is a certain amount of disillusionment creeping into the e health debate (tele-medicine and tele-health). This is because long-standing issues relating to privacy, access to records, the competency of some bureaucracies charged with overseeing projects and questions about the adequacy

Telemedicine and telehealth standards are established by the same state-specific regulatory institutions that establish standards for in-person clinical treatment. … But despite federal adjustments to telehealth oversight, many aspects of telehealth regulation are still determined on a state-by-state level

Since providers can’t physically examine patients during virtual medical appointments, it’s harder to carry out a standard of care

There are various limitations to telehealth- Telemedicine visits are not a complete substitute for in-person visits; nor they are feasible for all patients or clinical situations. For example, technology does not always work smoothly, and technical difficulties may interfere with delivery of care
Panic, fear, anxiousness has swept away many peoples ability to use logical thought processes. For some a learned helpless to comply with isolation, distancing themselves from human contact from others.

Many people have been swept away by a tidal wave of panic, and this warmed-over dystopia have become acceptable of this AI acceleration into their lives, just taking it all for granted without thinking about the serious consequences., the huge impacts of a global AI totalitarianism that controls peoples lives, that stops them from seeking human comfort instead turning to an AI decision making algorithm.

This is NOT NORMAL, and the so called NEW NORMAL should never be acceptable to the Human Race.

Mass surveillance can be the killer of the human race, this application of deep learning. Isolation and the lack of human contact.

Please click on the arrow above in the image which will link you to my Rumble Video with more important information on ‘Telehealth’ which the New Zealand Government is promoting in their white paper project in their partnership with the World Economic Forum.

Please sign up to my website if you have not done so already, thank you.

REIMAGINING REGULATION FOR THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) PROJECT- NZ GOVERNMENT PARTNERING THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Precision Farming is also known as Smart Farming. Smart Farming like Smart Cities include significantly increased surveillance, monitoring of every aspect of your life.

Surveillance of non-humans and humans, the dual purpose of Smart Farming. Which leads to zilch freedom, your private life being highly monitored hence controlled by digital technology through Precision Farming/ Smart Farming.

‘Smart is increasingly a euphemism for surveillance. Cities in at least 56 countries worldwide have deployed surveillance technologies powered by automatic data mining, facial recognition, and other forms of artificial intelligence.
Urban surveillance is a multi-billion dollar industry, with Chinese and U.S.-based companies such as Axis, Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, and ZTE leading the charge.

Now digital totalitarianism goes rural. Thus supercharging surveillance, encroaching on free speech, privacy, and data protection.
Identity collection devices are commonplace, having exploded across public and private spaces. Shanghai recently installed Alibaba’s City Brain public surveillance system, which oversees over 1,100 biometric facial recognition cameras. A combination of satellites, drones, and fixed cameras grab over 20 million images a day.

The bus, metro, and credit cards of local residents are also traced in real time. And these tools are spreading. Chinese firms are busily exporting surveillance tech to Latin America, other parts of Asia, and Africa, helping enable what some critics call digital authoritarianism.

New Zealand Government has its surveillance strategy as to COVID 19 monitoring. Public Health Surveillance of public health and data.
New Zealand surveillance data provided by ESR, funded by the Ministry of Health with the cooperation of the diagnostic laboratories.

Ministry of Health support enables ESR to provide some specific additional work, prioritised on the basis of national benefit and we are happy to collaborate with funded projects to mine the surveillance data. How transparent is this and how private?

The new coronavirus pandemic and related lockdown measures triggered a significant increase in digital control over people in many countries.
Search your history books how totalitarianism has caused torture, famines, millions murdered, imprisoned through Totalitarian Dictatorships. Under Digital Global Inclusion is our individual uniqueness being annihilated, is Newland as a sovereign nation being annihilated deliberately so, to replace, denounce NZ Citizenship for Global Citizenship?

Farming is the backbone of New Zealand, it’s credible to question , is this White Paper Project that refers to the NZ Governments partnership with the World Economic Forum part of the Global Digital Playbook to destroy the backbone of New Zealand through Smart Cities, Smart Farming (Precision Farming)?

Wake Up New Zealand. Carol Sakey.
PLEASE GO TO THE ARROW ABOVE THAT WILL LINK YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO TO MORE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON NZ GOVERNMENTS PARTNERSHIP WHITE PAPER WITH THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.

Please sign up to my website if you have not done so already and share this with your friends.

INFORMATION FOR THOSE THAT SAY THE NUREMBERG TRIALS (NUREMBERG CODE) NO LONGER RELATE TO HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS TODAY:-

REFERENCES ARE MADE TO THE: United Nations A/64/272 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 August 2009
Sixty-fourth session Item 71 (b) of the provisional agenda

Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms

This report discusses the need for laws and international instruments to take into account the vulnerability of certain individuals whose rights are compromised owing to deeply rooted power imbalances and structural inequalities, presenting particular responsibilities to States and health-care providers to protect the human dignity and autonomy of all persons.
In the recommendations, the Special Rapporteur urges: –
(a) States to meet their obligations to safeguard informed consent through legislative, political and administrative mechanisms;
(b) Health-care providers to be cognizant that, according to their duty to act in the best interests of the patient, they are key players in protecting informed consent
(c) National and international bodies to emphasize the importance of informed consent as a fundamental aspect of the right to health in relevant policy and practice.

The concept of consent has evolved for centuries to arrive at its current meaning. In the aftermath of the Nuremberg Trials, increased international recognition of patients’ rights developed in the twentieth century, defining the responsibility of health-care providers and States responsibilities to the patient.

In 1947, the Nuremberg Code asserted that the voluntary consent of the human subject to medical research is necessary under all circumstances. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) further developed the Code principles and tied them to the ethical duties of physicians, as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948)

In 1994, the World Health Organization Amsterdam Declaration on Patients’ Rights required informed consent as a prerequisite for any medical intervention, guaranteeing also the right to refuse or halt medical interventions.
Informed consent is not mere acceptance of a medical intervention, but a voluntary and sufficiently informed decision, protecting the right of the patient to be involved in medical decision-making, and assigning associated duties and obligations to health-care providers. Its ethical and legal normative justifications stem from its promotion of patient autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and well-being. Important components of informed consent are discussed below-

Respect for legal capacity Competency to consent is a status known as legal capacity generally determined by the ability to comprehend, retain, believe and weigh information provided in arriving at a decision. Legal capacity is presumed in adult persons and renders them the right to consent to, refuse or choose an alternative medical intervention.

Article 21 Health- Informed Consent
Prepared by the International Disability Caucus

The Working Group text for article 21 deals with informed consent in paragraphs (j) and (k):-
Ensure that health and rehabilitation services provided to persons with disabilities, and the sharing of their personal health or rehabilitation information, occur only after the person concerned has given their free and informed consent, and that health and rehabilitation professionals inform persons with disabilities of their relevant rights;

Prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

A footnote in the Working Group text suggested a definition for informed consent:- “Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.

1. Informed consent is an aspect of the right to health:- The right to the highest attainable standard of health (art. 12 ICESCR) states:-
The right to health contains both freedoms and entitlements. The freedoms include the right to control one’s health and body, including sexual and reproductive freedom, and the right to be free from interference, such as the right to be free from torture, non-consensual medical treatment and experimentation.

Thus, health is not a public good to be pursued independent of the will of each individual, but requires respect for the will of the individual person with respect to his or her own well-being. This is reinforced by the requirement that health services be culturally acceptable to individuals and communities

2. Informed consent must be guaranteed to persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.. prohibits discrimination in the exercise and enjoyment of the right to health, including on the ground of disability. The freedoms contained in the right to health, as well as the entitlements, are subject to non-discrimination.

The General Comment unfortunately perpetuates discrimination based on disability, by permitting exceptions to be made to the obligation to refrain from coercive medical practices, in the context of “treatment of mental illness or the prevention and control of communicable diseases” such as HIV/AIDS. Such exceptions fail to respect the rights and dignity of persons with psychosocial disabilities and persons living with HIV/AIDS and should not be repeated in this Convention.

Self-determination of persons with disabilities as starting point for informed consent:-
The proposed Supplement to the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, addressing the failure of governments to respect the autonomy of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, provides as follows:-

States should recognize that persons with disabilities have the same right to self-determination as other citizens, including the right to accept or refuse treatment. … States should also ensure that medical facilities and personnel inform people with disabilities of their right to self-determination, including the requirement of informed consent, the right to refuse treatment and the right not to comply with forced admission to institutional facilities. States should also prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and/or corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

The Supplement was developed by the Special Rapporteur on Disability in consultation with a panel of experts formed by international disability organizations, as part of mandated activity to monitor the Standard Rules. These provisions enjoy the support of the disability community and should be considered as a best practice in the establishment of human rights standards. Any exceptions or limitations to the exercise of informed consent by persons with disabilities will be a step backwards.

Legal capacity (capacity to act) underlies the right to informed consent:-
Legal capacity (capacity to act) is a necessary prerequisite for exercise of the right of informed consent by any individual. Without legal capacity, a person remains vulnerable to decisions by other people that may be unacceptable to the individual, and to a process of decision-making that disrespects self-determination and human dignity. In the health context, persons with disabilities face increased vulnerability to unacceptable services due to prejudice about our capabilities, needs, and worth as human beings. For this reason a recognition of legal capacity on an equal basis with others, with supported decision-making as an entitlement that must not undermine legal capacity, is necessary to ensure that informed consent is meaningful for all people with disabilities.

Article 9 addresses legal capacity as a transversal matter in the Convention, relevant to exercise of all rights and freedoms. In article 21, it is sufficient to establish a right to informed consent, without any exceptions or limitations, and leave the resolution of legal capacity to article 9.

5. Access to information

The provision of all health related information is to be timely, meaningful and accessible formats, modes, means and language, including sign language. This is crucially important for people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities.

The extent to which this provision is implemented will directly determine the extent to which people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities will be able to –

* access affordable health care without discrimination, clause 2(a);
* access the same range and standards of health services as others, clause 2(b);
* give informed consent to treatment, clause 2(e);
* access their health and medical records, clause 2(f);
* select treatment options, clause 2(g);
* access information to maximise personal health, clause 2(l).

“Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.’