INFORMATION FOR THOSE THAT SAY THE NUREMBERG TRIALS (NUREMBERG CODE) NO LONGER RELATE TO HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS TODAY:-

REFERENCES ARE MADE TO THE: United Nations A/64/272 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 August 2009
Sixty-fourth session Item 71 (b) of the provisional agenda

Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms

This report discusses the need for laws and international instruments to take into account the vulnerability of certain individuals whose rights are compromised owing to deeply rooted power imbalances and structural inequalities, presenting particular responsibilities to States and health-care providers to protect the human dignity and autonomy of all persons.
In the recommendations, the Special Rapporteur urges: –
(a) States to meet their obligations to safeguard informed consent through legislative, political and administrative mechanisms;
(b) Health-care providers to be cognizant that, according to their duty to act in the best interests of the patient, they are key players in protecting informed consent
(c) National and international bodies to emphasize the importance of informed consent as a fundamental aspect of the right to health in relevant policy and practice.

The concept of consent has evolved for centuries to arrive at its current meaning. In the aftermath of the Nuremberg Trials, increased international recognition of patients’ rights developed in the twentieth century, defining the responsibility of health-care providers and States responsibilities to the patient.

In 1947, the Nuremberg Code asserted that the voluntary consent of the human subject to medical research is necessary under all circumstances. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) further developed the Code principles and tied them to the ethical duties of physicians, as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948)

In 1994, the World Health Organization Amsterdam Declaration on Patients’ Rights required informed consent as a prerequisite for any medical intervention, guaranteeing also the right to refuse or halt medical interventions.
Informed consent is not mere acceptance of a medical intervention, but a voluntary and sufficiently informed decision, protecting the right of the patient to be involved in medical decision-making, and assigning associated duties and obligations to health-care providers. Its ethical and legal normative justifications stem from its promotion of patient autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and well-being. Important components of informed consent are discussed below-

Respect for legal capacity Competency to consent is a status known as legal capacity generally determined by the ability to comprehend, retain, believe and weigh information provided in arriving at a decision. Legal capacity is presumed in adult persons and renders them the right to consent to, refuse or choose an alternative medical intervention.

Article 21 Health- Informed Consent
Prepared by the International Disability Caucus

The Working Group text for article 21 deals with informed consent in paragraphs (j) and (k):-
Ensure that health and rehabilitation services provided to persons with disabilities, and the sharing of their personal health or rehabilitation information, occur only after the person concerned has given their free and informed consent, and that health and rehabilitation professionals inform persons with disabilities of their relevant rights;

Prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

A footnote in the Working Group text suggested a definition for informed consent:- “Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.

1. Informed consent is an aspect of the right to health:- The right to the highest attainable standard of health (art. 12 ICESCR) states:-
The right to health contains both freedoms and entitlements. The freedoms include the right to control one’s health and body, including sexual and reproductive freedom, and the right to be free from interference, such as the right to be free from torture, non-consensual medical treatment and experimentation.

Thus, health is not a public good to be pursued independent of the will of each individual, but requires respect for the will of the individual person with respect to his or her own well-being. This is reinforced by the requirement that health services be culturally acceptable to individuals and communities

2. Informed consent must be guaranteed to persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.. prohibits discrimination in the exercise and enjoyment of the right to health, including on the ground of disability. The freedoms contained in the right to health, as well as the entitlements, are subject to non-discrimination.

The General Comment unfortunately perpetuates discrimination based on disability, by permitting exceptions to be made to the obligation to refrain from coercive medical practices, in the context of “treatment of mental illness or the prevention and control of communicable diseases” such as HIV/AIDS. Such exceptions fail to respect the rights and dignity of persons with psychosocial disabilities and persons living with HIV/AIDS and should not be repeated in this Convention.

Self-determination of persons with disabilities as starting point for informed consent:-
The proposed Supplement to the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, addressing the failure of governments to respect the autonomy of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, provides as follows:-

States should recognize that persons with disabilities have the same right to self-determination as other citizens, including the right to accept or refuse treatment. … States should also ensure that medical facilities and personnel inform people with disabilities of their right to self-determination, including the requirement of informed consent, the right to refuse treatment and the right not to comply with forced admission to institutional facilities. States should also prevent unwanted medical and related interventions and/or corrective surgeries from being imposed on persons with disabilities.

The Supplement was developed by the Special Rapporteur on Disability in consultation with a panel of experts formed by international disability organizations, as part of mandated activity to monitor the Standard Rules. These provisions enjoy the support of the disability community and should be considered as a best practice in the establishment of human rights standards. Any exceptions or limitations to the exercise of informed consent by persons with disabilities will be a step backwards.

Legal capacity (capacity to act) underlies the right to informed consent:-
Legal capacity (capacity to act) is a necessary prerequisite for exercise of the right of informed consent by any individual. Without legal capacity, a person remains vulnerable to decisions by other people that may be unacceptable to the individual, and to a process of decision-making that disrespects self-determination and human dignity. In the health context, persons with disabilities face increased vulnerability to unacceptable services due to prejudice about our capabilities, needs, and worth as human beings. For this reason a recognition of legal capacity on an equal basis with others, with supported decision-making as an entitlement that must not undermine legal capacity, is necessary to ensure that informed consent is meaningful for all people with disabilities.

Article 9 addresses legal capacity as a transversal matter in the Convention, relevant to exercise of all rights and freedoms. In article 21, it is sufficient to establish a right to informed consent, without any exceptions or limitations, and leave the resolution of legal capacity to article 9.

5. Access to information

The provision of all health related information is to be timely, meaningful and accessible formats, modes, means and language, including sign language. This is crucially important for people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities.

The extent to which this provision is implemented will directly determine the extent to which people with sensory, intellectual and other disabilities will be able to –

* access affordable health care without discrimination, clause 2(a);
* access the same range and standards of health services as others, clause 2(b);
* give informed consent to treatment, clause 2(e);
* access their health and medical records, clause 2(f);
* select treatment options, clause 2(g);
* access information to maximise personal health, clause 2(l).

“Informed decisions can be made only with knowledge of the purpose and nature, the consequences, and the risks of the treatment and rehabilitation supplied in plain language and other accessible formats”.’

GLOBAL DIGITAL TOTALITARISM (TERRORISM) is a massive monster that is obsessed, is energized with massive global power to destruct and reconstruct people, planet and profit. People everyone, everywhere at every age and leave no-one behind on this planet called earth. The profit represents the humongous appetite greed for continued global wealth, power and status.

Totalitarianism is hell bent on destruction and reconstruction of the human species and everything that impacts on people worldwide. The UN equates this to People, Planet and Prosperity, however it’s the prosperity, the immense wealth that will line 0.01% of the world’s population. The wealthiest and the post powerful Eco-Socialist, leftists – global elite on this earth.

Like Dracula blood suckers they are sucking the very core out of society, populations, economy globally. 2019 High powered meeting at the UN, UN Agenda 2030 global development goals were failing, its documented by the UN “We must act now, we only have a narrow window of opportunity” It was late in 2019 that Russia and China introduced a cyberspace 3 page document to the UN, ‘Control of Cyberspace’.
Control of the Internet. The UN responded we will come back to you on this in December 2019, the UN accepted this and stated they would have a meeting in August 2022 to go over the references etc., to this.

Late 2019 the CCP.. The Chinese Communist Party introduced their first digital Yuen. There were big changes afoot in 2019. The United Nations and World Economic Forum, representative of Big Tech Big Pharma, Multistakeholder Corporations officially signed a partnership agreement. It is documented that this was to accelerate, advance the global development goals of UN Agenda worldwide.

UN Agenda 2030, 17 Global Development Goals (SDG’s) 169 targets. 17 out of 17 of these global development goals include Climate Alarmism. 14 out of 17 the Global Strategy of Vaccines..(2011-22019) in 2019 the Global Strategy of Vaccine – The Decade of Vaccines was introduced by the UN 2020-2030- The UN documents these two global strategies of vaccines ‘Leave No-One Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age- a lifetime of vaccines (from the cradle to the grave). Further documentation on the psycho-babble as to how to promote them for all health authorities and governments worldwide. More UN documentation ‘Hesitancy to Vaccines- Demand Vaccines- Target those that hesitate’ for the Western Regional Pacific Area- Australia, New Zealand, Pacific Islands.
Big Pharma and Big Data in collaboration, all teeters of big data, digitized totalitarianism – digitalized terrorism. Its about terrorizing billions of people by bludgeoning them with the weapons of fear.

Digitized Totalitarianism hell bent on re-engineering the soul. Fabrications, predictions, biases, using Arderns happiness indicators, other indicators and data modelling the fit the picture that the government require to introduce the policies that the government use to control the people.
Digitally produced Legal Fiction that has hijacked true knowledge and real science that energizes the power of the state to control its citizens. Re-imaginings so powerful that they perform behaviour modification, desensitizes, dehumanizes. These are digital instruments of the political trade to redesign individuals thoughts patterns, behaviors.. what YOU eat, where YOU live, how YOU think hence determining ones own worth and the worthiness or not of others.
This is the language of global imperialism.

The UN was founded in 1945, New Zealand Government was one of the founder members of the UN. NZ Government is the long arm of the UN.
In 1945 nearly a third of the worlds population lived in territories that were dependent of colonial powers. Decolonization was born with the UN. Those countries that had been colonized joined the UN. However decolonization continued until the UN General Assembly in 1960 adopted the ‘Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. The declaration affirmed the right of all people to self-determination and proclaimed that colonialism should be brought to a speedy and unconditional end.

2 years later a special committee on Decolonization was established to monitor its implementation. 1990 The UN Assembly proclaimed the ‘International Decade of Eradication of Colonialism (1990-2000) with a special plan of action.

2001 the second decade of the Eradication of Colonialism. The end of the 2nd decade coincided with the 15th anniversary of the Declaration of the Granting of Independence to Colonial Counties, Peoples. The 3rd International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism.
Considering ALL peoples had the right to self-determination I cannot comprehend why would you again grant the same right twice, I refer to the 2007 Declaration of Rights of the Indigenous People to ‘self determination’. Unknown to many this declaration has included in it a general limitations clause, allowing States to limit Indigenous peoples’ rights .
Therefore I can only personally conclude that by virtue of ‘ALL’ people having the right to self-determination then ALL people freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

The UN was created to stop all wars, eradicate poverty. They have failed, failed, failed. They now have 194 nations that belong to the UN. (The Global Imperial Public-Private Corporate One World Governance that is heavily influenced by the Communist Chinese Regime.
Under the veil of COVID19 governed, vast populations globally are controlled by a Chinese Communist Social Credit System. Rewards and Punishments, compliance, non-compliance makes no difference your freedoms, Human rights are eroded, obliterated.

CCP representatives are leaders of 5 UN agencies including the Food Agriculture Org., (UN) that monitors the global food chain.
The Chinese Communist Regime (CCP) have immense powers as a leader on the UN Security Council, the permeant power of Veto. As the CCP imprisons millions of its citizens over decades, tortures them, forced sterilizations, forced abortions, live organ harvesting. Even the Hague, the international criminal court refuses to investigate the CCP as mainland China does not come under their jurisdiction.

China’s Digitalized totalitarianism has stretched and promoted worldwide under the veil of COVID19.

The word Totalitarianism first appeared in the early 20th centuries work of Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile. This being Mussolini’s Doctrine of Fascism’. Back then Italy was unable to support itself and millions of people emigrated to find a better life elsewhere.
Gentiles political philosophy was the concept of ‘Total’, the State being an inclusive organic unity that transcends individual lives. All being surrendered to the State.

In 1932 Mussolini appointed Gentile to write whilst Mussolini authored the social and political principles that would define the fascist world view.
The doctrine declared the fascist attitude as above all “a spiritual attitude’ that penetrates the most intimate redoubt of each human participant.
1933 The term Totalitarianism was a force of power that swept across society. First in Russia in 1929 with Stalin and then in Germany in 1933 with Hitlers Nazi Regime.

All included were deluges of replacing facts with fictions and the collaboration of massive propaganda, misinformation. Common-sense, the truth became unlawful. The truth was determined by the State as it is now The propaganda machine published the truth is not the truth but a lie, as they do now, Deception, corruption ran amok as it does now.

Now, the global socialist elite power, status, greedy wealthy have the massive tool of digital terrorism to spread fear, to influence peoples minds, to cause havoc and grief, to separate loved ones, families.

As people praise this government and Ardern, lets look back in history as to what happened on August 15th 1939 when an article was published in the newsmedia, entitled “What’s going on in Russia’? It was written months after the massive evil terrors that took place during 1937-1938 when Stalin ordered the murders of whole sectors of the Soviet population from poets to diplomats, generals to loyalists. Robert Conquest a historian wrote within a 2 year period 7 million people were arrested, one million executed, 2 million deaths in labour camps, one million people imprisoned and another 7 million people still in labour camps at the end of 1938.

Despite all this evilness and cruelty an article in the ‘Constitution of the USSR’ described this horrendous time for the people of Russia as ‘The most democratic in the world, a foundation on which a future democracy may be built’

Stalin’s Red Army described there was free education and medical care, communal housing and equality of sexes. Stalinist patterns of violence, imprisonment, exile and execution shifted across the Baltic and into Eastern Poland. Between 1939-1945 hundred of 1,000’s of Polish people were marched to concentration camps. The propaganda machine worked overtime, just as it does now.

Stalin signed a non-aggressive pact with Hitler and attacked Poland and invaded Finland. 1940 Stalin ordered the massacre of 15,000 Polish Nationalists.
Between 1930 and his death in1953 Stalin made 10 appearances on the cover of Time Magazine, and was also named ‘Man of the Year’. This evil cruel entity who does not warrant being called a human being was given holywood stardom, no wonder fascism, totalitarianism still exists today.

Totalitarianism became an extreme powerful force it was institutionalized and has gone down in history as the biggest threat to civilization. That threat has not been resolved it still lives on, now globally under the veil of COVID19.

Digital Totalitarianism is a global fascism, a global fascist run state of the world, It interprets, develops, penetrates the whole of peoples lives. It’s a rule of conduct, a discipline it has replaced real science and truth, refashions, redesigns life’s content.

Digital Totalitarianism is hell bent on refashioning the soul, it’s the hallmark of totalitarian impulse, re-imaginings, leftist, socialist, communist, fascist ideologies immortalized in a modern day Stalinism, Nazism. Where global population are trying to survive the best way they can under a Chinese Communist Social Credit System. And small businesses, farmers and tradies trying their damdest to keep up with ESG score points, credit ratings. Digital Totalitarianism is hellbent on re-engineering the Soul.

From Kamal Harris to Jacinda Ardern the worlds most powerful women in politics 2020 (Forbes) Stalin was named Man Of the Year … Totalitarianism lives on, held under the great lights of global stardom and praise. No wonder Totalitarianism is running havoc with our lives today.

I have personally interviewed vaccinators at three COVID19 Vaccination Centre’s. Each individual vaccinator was questioned “If I have a COVID19 jab will you promise I will not have a serious adverse event or die from receiving the COVID19 jab”? In total 10 vaccinators each informed me that the COVID19 Vaccine is extremely safe.

True informed consent is a process, and, as such, it requires that the health-care provider enter into a discussion that ultimately leads to the patient understanding of their options, and the risks and benefits of the alternative courses of action.

New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 states the ‘Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment. Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.
The New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 is referred to in the COVID19 Public Health Response Act Section 11– The right to refuse to undergo medical treatment.
The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights – There is no particular age at which children or young people may give informed consent under the Code.

A HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO HEALTH:
– Accessibility- non-discrimination, physical accessibility, economic accessibility (affordability), information accessibility.
– Acceptability: respectful of medical ethics and culturally appropriate, sensitive to age and gender
– Quality: scientifically and medically appropriate

All people have the Right to Self-Determination. The historical and current development of the right to self-determination on the basis of the Charter i of the \ United Nations and other instruments adopted by United Nations organs, with particular reference to the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The Charter of the United Nations expressly establishes the right to self-determination.
Guaranteeing informed consent is fundamental to achieving the enjoyment of the right to health through practices, policies and research that are respectful of autonomy, self-determination and human dignity. Safeguarding informed consent along the health-care continuum is an obligation placed on States and third parties

The concept of consent has evolved for centuries to arrive at its current meaning. In the aftermath of the Nuremberg Trials, increased international recognition of patients’ rights developed in the twentieth century, hence defining the responsibility of health-care providers and States responsibilities to the patient.

In 1947, the Nuremberg Code asserted that the voluntary consent of the human subject to medical research is necessary under all circumstances. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) further developed the Code principles and tied them to the ethical duties of physicians, as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948).
In 1994, the World Health Organization Amsterdam Declaration on Patients’ Rights required informed consent as a prerequisite for any medical intervention, guaranteeing also the right to refuse or halt medical interventions.

Informed consent is not mere acceptance of a medical intervention, but a voluntary and sufficiently informed decision, protecting the right of the patient to be involved in medical decision-making, and assigning associated duties and obligations to health-care providers. Its ethical and legal normative justifications stem from its promotion of patient autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and well-being.

I am extremely concerned that young people in New Zealand can legally consent to participating in Clinical Trials without prior parental or guardianship consent. That they can also book a COVID19 jab online, or just turn up at a COVID19 Vaccination Centre, and are not be required to provide identification of proof of age.

The randomised Pfizer Clinical Trial (Human Experiments) was of 2,260 12 – 15year olds from across America. 50% of them were jabbed with a placebo, only 1,130 actually received the COVID19 jab. This is a very tiny percentage of the population within this age group considering there are almost 17 million 12-15 year olds in America alone and only 1,130 participants were required for FDA to give consent.

COVID 19 so called vaccines are not vaccines, they are inoculations. They do not stop infection, they are an immune treatment.
I am extremely concerned for our young people who have the legal right to consent to be participants in these human trials, human experiments. (12-15yrs old).
DHB’s are trying to get schools on board for onsite vaccination clinics.

Chris Hipkins has reported that COVID19 Vaccinations for children from the age of 5years will be rolled out by the end of January 2022 as FDA have given Pfizer provisional consent for these inoculations, they are just awaiting MEDSAFE approval.

Globally populations are being controlled by a Communist Chinese type Social Credit System of Rewards and Punishments, compliant or non-compliant our freedoms, human ights, civil liberties have been severely violated, it now appears that all these Human Rights just simply, sadly disappeared. We really do not have any Human Rights.

NOTE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO.