TABLE TOP EXERCISES THAT INFLUENCE INTERNATIONAL POLICY MAKING ‘EVENT 201’ WEF & GATES FOUNDATION

TABLE TOP EXERCISES ARE DESCRIBED AS A NORMAL TOOL OF PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION & RESPONSE.. Several have already been acted out for International purposes at the  John Hopkins Centre For Health Bloomberg Public Health Center. Partners of the Center include :- Independent research & analysists. Supported by governments worldwide, foundations- funders and partners  etc., To name a few:- Open Society Foundations (George Soros) * World Health Org., (UN) WHO *Bell & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation* CEC * FDA and many more. The John Hopkins Centre was founded in 1998 by D A Henderson as a first Global-Govt Organization

JOHN HOPKINS – BLOOMBERG SCHOOLS OF PUBLIC HEALTH- CENTER FOR HEALTH SECURITY FUNDERS AND PARTNERS INCLUDE.. The Center conducts independent research and analysis, and our work is supported by government, foundations, and gifts. We are grateful for the generous support from our funders and partners. To study the vulnerability of US Civilian population to Biological Weapons. 25 plus years on the John Hopkins Health Security Bloomberg School’ s focus in ‘Severe Pandemics that threaten Our World

George Soros- Open Society Foundations *WHO *John Hopkins  * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation *Rockefeller Foundation *Robert Wood Johnson Foundation U ASPR (Assistat Secretary for Prepared and Response *CDC *Homeland Security *FDA *DTRA *Alfred Sloan Foundation * de Beaument Foundation * Smith Richardson The Center was founded in 1998 by D.A. Henderson as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent, prepare, and respond to their consequences.

Between 1992- 2002 Published papers in Jama Medical Management of Biological Agents  *1999- 2000 Organized 2 National Symposia on Medical Health Response & Bio-terrorism *2001 was highly influential in government decisions to purchase a UN national Smallpox stockpile *2002 Became involved in the Guidance for Hospital and Communities in the US on Pandemic Preparedness Hospital Programmes *2003 Led & shaped US National efforts to engage the public in epidemic & disaster response policies & programs. Launched their 1st Peer Reviewed Journal in this field. Consequently Bioterrorism & Biosecurity was later renamed Health Security. In 2004 John Hopkins Health Security Centre’s research provoked US Policy of ‘Dual Use Research’. Startups publishing annual Health Security  federal funded articles. Which were used by the Media *Government to understand Bio-defense & Health Security

2006 John Hopkins Centre’s analysis * advocacy helped to form the ‘Pandemic & All-Hazards Preparedness Act and the Bio-medical Advanced Research & Development Authority (BARDA) *2011 John Hopkins Centre published its first ‘Nuclear Preparedness Guidance’ aimed at Public Health, medical and Civic Leader in the Rad Resilient City Initiative

2006 The John Hopkins Center analysis and advocacy helped to inform the framework for the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act, as well as the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

2011 Published first nuclear preparedness guidance aimed at public health, medical, and civic leaders in the Rad Resilient City initiative. The initiative providing cities & their neighbors with a checklist of ‘preparedness actions’ following a nuclear detonation. Also provided leaders a Checklist of Preparedness’ as to the risk of terrorism

2012 John Hopkins created their first International Fellowship Program focused on building Bio-security leadership.. And a first effort report on how to allocate resources during a Pandemic. * In 2013 they helped lead-develop the US National Health Security Preparedness Index. (The first State to State Index on Health Preparedness)

2013-2014: John Hopkins Centre participated in debate referring to ‘Gain Of Function’-Potential Pathogen Research. This resulted in US Govt funding and a new US Policy *2014-2016 Established Track 2 – S E Asian-US & India -US Biosecurity dialogues * 2017 Published their first working paper in the field of ‘defining global catastrophic biological risks- catalyzing a new focus on these issues *John Hopkins Health Centre- Bloomberg School of Health Security are also well known worldwide for their famous ‘Table Top- Simulation Exercises. (1) 2001 ‘Dark Winter Exercise- Depicting a smallpox attack on the US- which led the US Govt to stockpile Smallpox Vaccines

The 2005 ‘Atlantic Storm’ Table-top simulation Exercise focusing on the Inter-dependence that is demonstrated among International Communities in the face of Epidemics & Biological Weapons. * Another John Hopkins Centre Exercise namely ‘CLADEX’ in 2018. Was a major table-top exercise on major political and policy decision making that would emerge if a global catastrophic biological event was to occur.

The one I find most interesting is John Hopkins Bloomberg Centre For Health Security – namely EVENT 201’ which took place on October 18th 2019. Only e months before the emergence of the COVID19 Pandemic. Of course Fact Checkers- and the usual participants- NGO’s- Govts etc., have said “Nothing to See Here- Its nothing to do with the emergence of the COVID 19 Pandemic”

The 18th October 2019 ‘201’ Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was held at the Pierre Hotel in New York. The audience was by invite only (A livestream audience) Which has Video coverage on You Tube which can be viewed. The Tabletop exercise for the Global Pandemic was organized by the John Hopkins Center For Health Security, the World Economic Forum and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Funded by the ‘Open Philanthropy Project’

The Players (Actors) that participated in the Event 201 Table Top Exercise were individuals from Global Businesses, Govt & Public Health and involved Sofia Borges UN Foundation Senior Director at the New York Head Office of the UN * Dr Chris Elias -President of the Global Development Programme of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Dr Chris Elias serves as the President and CEO of PATH, an International non-profit organization and various other Advisory Boards including the Advisory Committee to the Director of the CDC & the Washington Global Health External Advisory Board. Also a Chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Other participating actors of the ‘Global Pandemic Table-Top Exercise Event’ include Timothy Evans (McGill University. Associate Dean of the School Of Population and Global Health in the Faculty of Medicine & Associate Vice Principle of the Global Policy and Innovation. Has a important role at the World Bank Group (The Nutrition, Health Population Global Practice)

Timothy Evans joined McGill University in September 2019 as the Inaugural Director and Associate Dean of the School of Population and Global Health (SPGH) in the Faculty of Medicine and Associate Vice-Principal (Global Policy and Innovation). He joined McGill after a 6-year tenure as the Senior Director of the Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice at the World Bank Group.

A Representative of WHO (World Health Org, UN). Dr Evans who was Assistant Director General of WHO from 2003-2010. He is at the forefront for the last 20 years advancing Global Health Equity & Global Health Systems. Leading the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Also over-seeing the production of the annual World Health Report (UN) A Co-Founder of many partnerships, including the Global Alliance on Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI). He led the China CDC Team from September to November 2013 in the fights against Ebola

Participants of the Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 included Representatives of the UN in various Global Initiatives* Representative from Vodafone Foundation *ANZ Bank *Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Representative  *WEF Representation *Global Business Advisory Leader * Lufthansa Group Airlines * UPS Foundation *A major Media Company* A member of the Monetary Authority of Singapore *Global Health Johnson & Johnson

The Global Pandemic Exercise concluded with Recommendation including a Call of Action for Public-Private Partnerships for a Global Pandemic Preparedness Response. The John Hopkins Global Pandemic Table-top Exercise was played out like it was in reality the pending Global Pandemic with all the mandatory Restrictions. Involved Radio and TV Broadcasting. Mis-Disinformation Campaigns.

Economic and societal impacts- social consequences- suffering. Unpresented levels of collaboration between govts, international organizations and the Private Sector. Lockdowns, social distancing. The challenges posed by the populations. A new robust form of public-private cooperation to address the pandemic. Proposals were made by WEF * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation * John Hopkins Centre for Health Security

This included Govts international organizations, business, have essential corporate capabilities to be utilized on a very large scale during the Pandemic. Stating public sectors will be over-whelmed. Economic losses. Social Media, communications systems, global news media needed to enable govts emergency response. Operational partnerships between govt responses

WHO currently had a influenza vaccine stockpile with contracts to pharmaceutical companies that they agreed to supply during a global Pandemic. WHOs ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need. WHO R& D Blueprint Pathogens to be deployed in clinical trials during outbreaks in collaborations with CEPT, GAVI and WHO with Bi- or multinational agreements

* Cancelling of travel by Air & by Sea. International Aviation and Shipping *Border measures. Leading to unjustified border measures. Fear & uncertainty. Severely affecting Employment, businesses.. global supplies of products etc., Vaccine deaths are absent.

November 19th 2019 WEF article on managing Risk & Impact of Guture Pandemics. Also a Private Sector Roundtable- A Global Agenda 19th November 2011. 12th May 2019 WEF Peter Sands. Outbreak – Readiness and Business Impact. Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global economy.( WEF)

Also includes references to – The Center’s scholars researched these topics to inform the scenario.CAPS: The Pathogen and Clinical Syndrome (PDF) *Communication in a pandemic (PDF) *Event 201 Model (PDF) *Finance in a pandemic (PDF) *Medical countermeasures (PDF)

All reported as a fictional unplanned Global COVID 19 Pandemic outbreak but it was played out as if in reality 18th October 2019 prior to COVID19 global emergence. Also recommended was the SPARS Pandemic 2015-2028 Table-top exercise at the John Hopkins Centre For Health and Security (October 2017) A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators

Recommended Citation Schoch-Spana M, Brunson EK, Shearer MP, Ravi S, Sell TK, Chandler H, Gronvall GK. The SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; October 2017.

This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional

LINK TO THE ‘ECHO CHAMBER’ SPARS PANDEMIC 2025- 2028 (https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf)

https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise

OTHER LINKS OF INTEREST: 1 Global Health Security: Epidemics Readiness Accelerator. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/projects/managing-the-risk-and-impact-of-future-epidemics. Accessed 11/19/19

2 Private Sector Roundtable. Global health Security Agenda. https://ghsagenda.org/home/joining-the-ghsa/psrt/. Accessed 11/19/19

3 Peter Sands. Outbreak readiness and business impact: protecting lives and livelihoods across the global economy. World Economic Forum 2019. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/outbreak-readiness-and-business-impact-protecting-lives-and-livelihoods-across-the-global-economy. Accessed 12/5/19

https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response/

https://www.cni.org/topics/special-collections/event-201-why-werent-we-paying-attention

https://science.feedback.org/review/simulation-exercises-such-as-catastrophic-contagion-normal-part-pandemic-preparedness-dont-predict-future-pandemics/

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

...

Other Blog Posts

HE PUAPUA THE UNDRIP PLAN TO ACTION APARTHEID AND SEPERATISM IN NEW ZEALAND.

In 2007 under the labour Government they were totally opposed to the UNDRIP for the following reasons. But  for all these reasons that all these reasons why they rejected it, they are now supporting it, and promoting it.

In 2010 John Keys under a veil of secrecy arranged for Pita Sharples co leader of the Maori party to go to New York UN Assembly to be a representative of NZ where he adopted the UNDRIP.  The following is what he agreed upon on behalf of the peoples of New Zealand, which of course they did not even know about until after the dirty deed was done.

Iwi/Maori to have  Veto Rights over others. Control of NZ’s Natural Resources. Veto rights over the laws of Parliament. Two classes of citizenship. The UNDRIP was not compliant with the Treaty. Iwi/Maori  would have own  the entire lands of NZ, that others already legally own. The rights to redress lands (compensation) for the entire lands of New Zealand.

It was said by Rosemary Banks that represented New Zealand at the UN in 2007 that the UNDRIP is seen by others attending the UN Assembly as a document of Aspiration not a legal document to be acted upon.

He Puapua report that was commissioned by Ardern’s Cabinet in 2019. This is the action plan which includes the UNDRIP which is the hugely controversial undemocratic  Co-governance of New Zealand.

Researched By Carol Sakey  WakeUpNZ

...

IWI TRIBAL ELITE COLLABORATION BETWEEN CO-GOVERNANCE AND NZ’S ACCELERATION OF UN AGENDA 2030

Included in the  universal agenda 2030 global development goals there is an invested interest in ‘Indigenous’ peoples in transforming our world, which is extremely strong and hypo political. Indigenous indicators integrated into Agenda 2030 indicators 1.42 and 5 a 1 on land Iwi/Maori interests and rights.

Established at a global level is actioned, promoted at country level advancing UN Agenda 2030, monitoring, measuring promoting indigenous tribal progress as to UN Agenda 2030. This is reported as a work in progress.

Hence a UN  high level political following as referenced in (2030 Resolution follow up Review A/RES/701299)  11th July 2016  which included thematic discussions with Indigenous peoples at the very core of UN Agenda 2030. As to  Indigenous Tribal Rights.. Indigenous Development Goals. Essential self-determination to accelerate promote growth modification

In New Zealand this is being played out by certain Iwi Elite in partnership with the government. With global, regional and national political forums supported, implemented into the framework strategic plans to accelerate UN Agenda 2030 in NZ.

With UN Member States governments facilitating indigenous peoples at national level to be given rights that others do not have, using indigenous indicators, specific measurements through an established Iwi/Maori Digital Sovereignty.

Iwi/Maori Digital Sovereignty using indigenous indicators. Tribal sovereignty with Iwi aspirations. For Indigenous people to be given over others by using indigenous indicators, a specific indigenous measurement

Prof. Dawn Freshwater of Auckland University was documented in an article referencing Iwi/Maori knowledge to research Disinformation and to tackle UN Agenda 2030 goals, to drive the global development goals of Agenda 2030 in relation to climate change and the  decolonization agenda.

Iwi/Maori having the ability to interrogate information to maximize impacts through Indigenous Sovereignty Data transferred, translated into different contexts.

The United Nations Association of NZ will be hosting an Advancing Agenda 2030 Conference on 28th September in the Banquet Hall in Parliament from 12.30m till 7.30pm. It has been reported that NZ is at mid-point to achieving UN Agenda 2030. Accelerated actions are needed.

The conference highlights are reported to be the key speakers firstly Ashley Bloomfield he is described as leading the Pandemic plans and also referred to WHO Geneva. The panel discussion speakers are:-

Ibrahim Omer, Carolyn Schwaiger NZ Representative to the UN New York, Mary Wareham Advocacy Director of the Arms Div., of the human Rights watch and Sophie Handford Kapiti Coast District Council.

Topics include ‘Climate Change, reforming the UN and countering Disinformation. Hosted by the UN Association NZ

New Zealand advances UN Agenda 2030 through Iwi/Maori Digital Sovereignty and multi-stakeholder partnership with the government implemented at a High Political Level by the UN as to Indigenous Peoples Rights to ‘self determination’. Co-Governance in NZ.

Researched By Carol Sakey  WakeUpNZ

https://www.unanz.org.nz/learn/news-and-events/advancing-the-2030-agenda-national-conference/

https://events.humanitix.com/una-nz-national-conference-2023?_ga=2.91400282.1727577303.1691100648-1704987723.1676854874

https://www.aucland.ac.nz/en/news/2023/05/31/knowledge-equity-can-hel-drive-sdg-agenda.html

...

THE ROYAL INQUIRY INTO THE CHRISTCHURCH TERRORIST ATTACKS CALLS FOR DIVERSITY EQUITY AND INCLUSION DEI

DEI Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiative is entrenched in Critical Theory and Marxism (Cultural Marxism) and Identity Politics. Below are some of the Christchurch Inquiry conclusions…DEI is being rolled out worldwide and is massively initiated throughout Central and Local Government, Police, Military, NGO’s, Academia, Schools and Universities etc.,

Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain on 15 March 2019

The terrorist attack was driven by an extreme right-wing Islamophobic ideology. Its purpose was to promote chaos and disharmony in New Zealand. However it was reported he was a lone wolf actor of terrorism. It was reported that  NZrs united around racism, extremism and extremist violence. (The propaganda machine deliberately  caused division of peoples within NZ) The Inquiry asked questions of the public sector agencies, Police, Government Security, NZ SIS Services. 1,100 plus submissions were received. Leaders of International Security Services were involved, family of the victims and survivors of the attack. The Inquiry made recommendations for the future. There was inquiries as to the life of the offender who arrived in NZ 2017 and within 3 months of arrival was able to obtain a firearms license, hence purchased firearms and ammunition. Again the report says “He acted alone”. focus of the counter-terrorism resources was on what was seen as the presenting threat of Islamist extremist terrorism. The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service had decided to concentrate its scarce counter-terrorism resources on the presenting threat of Islamist extremist terrorism.

Since 2015, successive governments have been reluctant to proceed with a public-facing counter-terrorism strategy. One reason for this was to avoid stigmatizing Muslim communities. Part of the focus of the Royal Inquiry was : Social cohesion and embracing diversity. Firearm licensing was included in the Inquiry (Govt Gun Buyback Scheme) Low levels of trust in Media and Govt. Even though COVID19 did not show its head in NZ until early 2020 COVID 19 response was bought into the equation. Stated that NZ will never be immune from violent extremism and terrorism

“The terrorist attack” means the terrorist attack carried out by the individual in accordance with his planning and preparation over the previous years

Recommendations Made included:- a) Improving New Zealand’s counter-terrorism effort. b) Improving New Zealand’s firearms licensing system. c) Supporting the ongoing recovery needs of affected whānau, survivors and witnesses of the 15 March 2019 terrorist attack. d) Improving New Zealand’s response to our increasingly diverse population. e) Implementation of the recommendations. 3 The recommendations are organized by four themes. To increase promote a more diverse inclusive population in NZ

The Public sector mindset must shift to value communities’ input into decisions, transparency and engaging in robust debate… Robust public debate that is highly targeted. As well, the government must understand what New Zealand’s changing demographics mean for New Zealand as a society and promote consistent messages about the benefits of diversity and an inclusive society. New Zealand needs fit for purpose laws and policies

Recommendations to improve social cohesion and New Zealand’s response to our increasingly diverse population We recommend that the Government: 28. Announce that the Minister for Social Development and Employment and the Ministry of Social Development have responsibility and accountability for coordinating a whole-of-government approach to building social cohesion, including social inclusion. Direct the Ministry of Social Development to discuss and collaborate with communities, civil society, local government and the private sector on the development of a social cohesion strategic framework and a monitoring and evaluation regime.

30. Investigate the machinery of government options for an agency focused on ethnic communities and multiculturalism and establish a fit for purpose organizational design that will encompass the current functions expected of the Office of Ethnic Communities and enable the new responsible Public sector agency to focus on and perform the following functions: a) advise the government and Public sector agencies about priorities and challenges that affect ethnic communities’ wellbeing; b) collate and use data to analyze, monitor and evaluate Public sector efforts to improve the wellbeing of ethnic communities, what those efforts should be and how they should be prioritized; and c) develop an evaluation framework that incorporates performance indicators that examine the impact and effectiveness of government policies and programmes on the wellbeing of ethnic communities.

Prioritize the development of appropriate measures and indicators (such as the Living Standards Framework) of social cohesion, including social inclusion. 32. Require Public sector agencies to prioritize the collection of data on ethnic and religious demographics to support analysis and advice on the implications of New Zealand’s rapidly changing society, inform better policy making and enhance policy evaluation. 33. Direct the chief executives of the Public sector agencies involved in the counter-terrorism effort to continue focusing efforts on significantly increasing workforce diversity, including in leadership roles, and in consultation with the Advisory Group on Counter-terrorism (Recommendation 7).

Invest in opportunities for young New Zealanders to learn about their role, rights and responsibilities and on the value of ethnic and religious diversity, inclusivity, conflict resolution, civic literacy and self-regulation. Require all Public sector community engagement to be in accordance with New Zealand’s Open Government Partnership commitments

Require all Public sector community engagement to be in accordance with New Zealand’s Open Government Partnership commitments and in particular: a) require agencies to be clear about the degree of influence that community engagement has on associated decision-making by indicating to communities where the engagement sits on the International Association for Public Participation IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum; and b) encourage agencies to undertake more “involve” and “collaborate” levels of engagement in accordance with the International Association for Public Participation IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum.

Amend legislation to create hate-motivated offences in: a) the Summary Offences Act 1981 that correspond with the existing offences of offensive behavior or language, assault, wilful damage and intimidation; and b) the Crimes Act 1961 that correspond with the existing offences of assaults, arson and intentional damage. 40. Repeal section 131 of the Human Rights Act 1993 and insert a provision in the Crimes Act 1961 for an offence of inciting racial or religious disharmony, based on an intent to stir up, maintain or normalize hatred, through threatening, abusive or insulting communications with protected characteristics that include religious affiliation.

Amend the definition of “objectionable” in section 3 of the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 to include racial superiority, racial hatred and racial discrimination. 42. Direct New Zealand Police to revise the ways in which they record complaints of criminal conduct to capture systematically hate-motivations for offending and train frontline staff in: a) identifying bias indicators so that they can identify potential hate crimes when they perceive that an offence is hate-motivated; b) exploring perceptions of victims and witnesses so that they are in a position to record where an offence is perceived to be hate-motivated; and c) recording such hate-motivations in a way which facilitates the later use of section 9(1)(h) of the Sentencing Act 2002.

Included in the documentation of the inquiry The repeated failures on the part of the Crown to uphold its commitments under Te Tiriti o Waitangi have caused widespread and ongoing harms.3 (Maori-Crown Relationship) and the colonization of NZ. Conflicts, protests and self determination.

Diversity, Inclusion Equity (DEI) include initiatives that are full of uncertainties and difficulties. DEI consumes Political identity, Marxist culturalism and Critical Theory (Critical Race Theory)

 

https://gg.govt.nz/sites/default/fil es/2021-06/RC%20145%20Terrorist%20Attack%20on%20Christchurch%20Masjidain.pdf  166 Pages pdf Parts 1-3

...

THE EVIL BASTARD ISLAMIC EXTREMIST ATTACK ON CHRISTIANS IN MOSCOW YESTERDAY

The evil radical Islamic attack on Moscow and the massive persecution of Christians throughout the world….

THIS SHOULD BRING IT HOME TO EVERYONE’ 2023 report Vatican News’ Over 360 million Christians suffered persecution in the world in one year 2023.  1 in 7 Christians suffer high levels of persecution. 2022- 2023 was the worst year for Christians worldwide, because of the intensify violence, discrimination, exclusion. There is a drastic increase of kidnapping, abductions of Christians. 30,000 incidents have been recorded. Churches have been targeted. Thousands of Christian women raped, forced marriages, forced conversion. This is only the top of the iceberg. There are 50 countries in an updated report that face the most extreme persecution for their Christian faith.

The World Watch List is Open Doors’ annual ranking of the top 50 countries where Christians face the most persecution and/or discrimination for their faith.  Since 1993, the annual report has revealed the scale and severity of the persecution of Christians, with the number of countries where Christians suffer high and extreme levels of persecution having almost doubled to more than countries since the report’s inception.

Last year 4,998 Christian were killed for their faith worldwide (World Watch 2024). By Islamic militants, armed bandits, some countries allowing, enabling this Islamic militancy to flourish. Christians deemed either friends or foe. Foreign influence repress religious freedom, Two-thirds of all attacks and closures of churches and public Christians properties were in China, where tightening religious laws and intrusive surveillance have forced many churches to splinter into a myriad of small, less visible groups. Even many of those regulated by the state have been closed and amalgamated with larger churches

Yesterday a concert hall in Moscow was attacked, this was a bloody attack by the Islamic State. Its reported there were four gunmen and dozens of Christians are dead. The Islamic State published a photo of the 4 attackers, it is reported that they planned and conducted this evil assault on the Moscow Concert Hall and that 130 lives have been lost. Brutally murdered.

Its reported the men were wearing baseball caps and face scarfs pointing to the sky with one finger, a gesture that has become associated with the Islamic State terrorists. In the background an Islamic State poster. The extremist Islamic murderous Islamic terrorists carried out an intensive monitoring operation before the attack, according to the statement. The four evil Islamic terrorist  bastards were armed with machine guns, knives, bombs they sought to inflict as much damage as they possible could on a large crowd of Christians. The extremist Islamic state wounded people in total. The Islamic State terrorist stating they are ‘waging war between the Islamic State and countries fighting Islam”

A senior counter terrorism official has confirmed as such to the New York times that this is the Islamic State known as IS-K (New York Times reported) This being an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. IS-K is an offshoot of the terror group active in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. Earlier this month the US Embassy in Moscow issued a warning of potential terror attacks by extremist advising US citizens to avoid large gatherings, including concerts. Earlier this month, the top US general in the Middle East said IS-K could attack US and Western interests outside of Afghanistan “in as little as six months and with little to no warning.”

But by Saturday US Officials privately admitted the terrorist alert had been partially based on recent intelligence indicating the IS-K branch of the terror group was active inside Russia

LETS REVISIST NEW ZEALAND HISTORY. A KNIFE ATTACK ON SHOOPERS AT A NEW LYNN MALL BY A CHARACTER OF ISLAMIX EXTREMISM BEING MONITORED  BY POLICE OUTSIDE THE MALL AS HE WAS INSIDE THE SUPERMARKET IN THE MALL. SHOPPERS WERE BADLY INJURED, TRAUMATIZED. This quickly died a natural death by the Mainstream media propaganda machine. Then before that the police officer down south who had his police car rammed, a hatchet carrying, knife wielding Islamic terrorist hacking at the police cars bonnet as this maniac shouts out Ala akaba, the police officer managed to radio for help, climb out a passenger door window, as he was chased by this Islamic hatchet wielding evil bastard. It was reported the police officer feared he would be decapitated.

Going back further in  NZ history: And now thinking about how law abiding citizens have been harassed, targeted by police, surveillance, report in the CH Ch Royal Inquiry stating that Police and SIS had listed 1700 NZrs on a suspect  watch list. The Inquiry concluded their was no evidence for them to have these 1700 Kiwi names listed.  Since the Australian Citizens attack on CH CH Mosques we have been targeted as being ‘white supremacists, extreme right, islamophobics and the list goes on, the character assassination of law abiding Kiwi citizens has been huge.

Lets go back to the Beehive 6th November  2014 John Key speaks in the House. He announces the response to threats against NZ’s National Security by International Terrorism. He said this is serious and he takes his responsibilities seriously for those NZrs at home and abroad. He announced a review of NZs Security settings around foreign fighter, outlined urgent changes that was needed to address the evolving threat environment. The rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) posing a threat not just internationally but regionally and locally. Saying that ISIL is thought to have 3000 foreign fighters in its ranks holding western passports from a range of countries

John Key stated “We’re extremely concerned about New Zealanders being attracted to this brutal regime – as in other Western countries, ISIL has been successful in recruiting New Zealanders to its cause,”. “Government agencies have a watch list of between 30 and 40 people of concern in the foreign fighter context. These are people in, or from New Zealand who are in various ways participating in extremist behavior.”

Some of the watch list group have travelled to Syria to engage in fighting and remain there. Others are ISIL supporters who have tried to travel but been prevented by the cancellation of their passports.            The remaining people on the watch list are involved in funding terrorism, radicalizing others or are becoming radicalized themselves. Another 30 to 40 individuals require further investigation in addition to the watch list group. Responding to the evolving terrorist fighter issue the Cabinet approved limited focused legislative changes . And a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZ SIS to increase staff numbers

In addition to this the Government has committed a funding injection of almost $7 million to the NZSIS to increase the number of staff able to work on investigations. Along with these changes the NZ Govt continued to consider NZs potential contribution the international coalition against ISIL. Key concluded he will take a careful considered approach to the rising threat of ISIL which is presented locally, regionally, internationally

17 Community questions to those whom survived the CH CH mosque attacks and their families. “Whom were you scared off before 15th March 2019, the time of the terrorist attack by an Australian Citizen REPLY ‘Daesh’ ISIS. Prior to Ramadan. Tarrant made several visits to Turkey and also a 42 day stay there, at the time that Tourist agencies were reporting that westerners should stay away from Turkey because of kidnappings, killings of westerners, it was dangerous. Strange that Tarrant felt safe enough to stay in Turkey. FOOD DFOR THOUGHT and Prayers for those murdered seriously harmed in that blood bath in a Moscow Concert Hall full of Christians by evil bastard Extremist Islamic Terrorists   So Ardern for your CH CH Call globally. So Luxon your embracing support for Arderns CH Call.

https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/part-8-assessing-the-counter-terrorism-effort/introduction/

...