June 12^th 1996 Wall Street Journal reported that last week the IPCC (UN) regarded as the best source of scientific information about human impact on the earths climate released The Science of Climate Change 1995 its first new report for 5 years. This was said to be the most authoritative statement on global warming, policy makers and the press worldwide would report on the critical decisions on energy policy that would have an enormous impact on US oil and gas prices and on the international community. As always the IPCC report has been highly regarded because it is peer reviewed, that is read, discussed and modified and even re-modified by so called International experts. However this report is not what it appears to be, it is not the version that was approved by contributing scientists listed on the title page. This indeed is a very disturbing corruption of the peer reviewed process reported an expert who has more than 60 years as a member of the American Scientific Community, including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society

His words were “ I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer reviewed process that the events that led up to this IPCC report. Key changes were made after scientists had met and accepted what they thought was the final peer reviewed version, believing that IPCC would obey IPCC rules- a body of regulations, that’s suppose to govern the IPCC panels actions. There is nothing in the IPCC Rules that permits anyone to change a scientific report after it has been accepted by the panel of scientific contributors and the full IPCC. Participating scientists accepted ‘The Science of Climate Change’ in Madrid, then it was accepted again in Rome.  But more than 15 sections in Chapter 8 of the report, the key chapter setting out scientific evidence for and against human influence over climate were changed or deleted after the scientists charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text. These were not merely cosmetic changes, nearly all worked to remove skeptics’ with which scientists regard claims that human activities are having a major impact on climate in general and on global warming in particular.

The following passages are examples of those included in the approved report but deleted from the supposedly peer reviewed published version:- · “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.”

• “No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes.”
• “Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced.”

It is reported that the reviewing scientist used this original language to keep themselves and the IPCC honest. IPCC reports are often called the ‘CONSENSUD’ view. If they lead to carbon taxes and restraints on economic growth, they will have a major and almost certainly a destructive impact on economies of the world. This is no doubt deception and corruption to deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows that human activities are causing global warming. There is evidential concern as to the IPCC process as to scientific evidence a global warming. The Wall Street Journal July 11^th 1996 entitled ‘Coverup in the Greenhouse’? Author Dr. Seitz, former president of the U. S. National Academy of Sciences, revealed that an unsponsored scientific report promoting global warming has been tampered with for political purposes.  That there had been protests from officials of the IPCC claiming that the revisions in their report, prior to publication “did nothing to change its emphasis”. And said that “ such unannounced change of an approved draft do not violate their rules of transparency and open review”.  However the evidence is there, and IPCC Officials quoted (Not named) by a Nature Article “The reasons for revisions to the chapter was to “ensure that it conformed to a ‘policymakers’ summary of the full report”. The response to that from the Scientific community of experts was “”Should not a summary conform to the underlying scientific report rather than vice versa?

The Wall Street Journal article pointed out that “the IPCC summary itself is a political document, is economical with the truth, has problems with selective presentations of facts, it totally ignored global temperature data gathered by weather satellite’s, because they contradict the results of the models used to predict future global warming. IPCC providing so called scientific cover for political action, misusing respected scientists who never made extravagant claims about future warming. Where politicians and activists strive for international controls on energy use which was discussed in Geneva, when parties to the Global Climate Treaty convened, those that are anxious to stipulate that science is settled, trying to marginalize the growing number of scientific critics.

It was reported that the IPCC Report on global climate change has been ‘scientifically cleansed. The author of this article in the Wall Street Journal 1996 was S Fred Singer, President of the Science & Environmental Policy Project. IPCC (UN) report that Science is Settled. It is the nature of science that is never settled. You will have heard that 97% of scientists believe humans are causing catastrophic global warming requiring govt action to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. This comes from surveyed climate related scientific studies, the results being over-simplified Many scientists whose papers were cited in this study have questioned its conclusions, suggesting that their papers were incorrectly interpreted, even accusing the author of cherry picking studies to fit the global agenda. An UN senior official speculated that the world would be under water by the year 2000, misleading figures and stats, data continue to be peddled, and government leaders shut down any public debates. This is called an anti-science political tactic. Plus the activist mainstream media that influences populations mindsets that report that ‘Science is settled’

The New York Times  reported 10^th December 2015 an article entitled “How Can Climate Science Be Settled?’. When computer models do not take into account all the variables, yet the media keep saying that climate change is settled. Science is never settled. Politicians and environmental activists and advocacy groups say that ‘climate is settled”. The Beehive 6^th December 2022 Speaker in the House was Dr Ayesha Verrall on Research, Science and Innovation focused on ‘future focused science system tackling NZ ’as big challenges on Climate Change. She referred to ‘shifting from a system with multiple small entities and strategies focusing on efforts on nationally significant priorities. Ultimately researchers, industry, government and Iwi focusing on sustained investment in new technologies and industries, that will embed Te Tiriti o Waitangi being more responsive to Iwi/Maori to improve wealth and resilience in these communities.

2^nd December 2020 NZ Parliament Climate Change Declaration of Emergency references the IPCC and reducing the impact of human activity on the climate. Join 1800 jurisdictions in 32 countries to declare a climate emergency. Seize the opportunities that a clean green reputation provides, includes the decline in Indigenous Biodiversity. Be a Carbon Neutral Govt by 2025. A declaration based on science. The UN IPCC. The declaration of global responsibility, a catalyst for change. Announcing the Carbon Neutral Programme. The ACT Party Simon Court speaker in Parliament stated that the Climate Emergency is simply a triumph of politics over practical solutions. He said “he knows that human activity has a significant impact on climate and the environment. ACT declared that the Climate Emergency was “Nothing but a Stunt”. He referred to “Stop flying MPs all over the country, wherever they like, as MPs are the only people in the world with unlimited travel budget to fly anywhere they like, whenever they want at the tax payers expense”

However ACT believes that NZ Govt must play their part through innovation led business, engineers, scientists not through slogans and PR stunts.James Shaw embraced ‘Fridays for Climate Strikes’ school strikes for climate. Nicola Willis (National) said that the Climate Emergency Declaration will have no measurable impact on global climate change and the opposition know it. “ It won’t take a single car off the road. It won’t reduce the methane from a single cow, nor remove a single tonne of carbon dioxide from the air.  The motion before us employs all the implied drama of the word “emergency”, but it does so with zero practical effect. It is, unfortunately, yet another collection of words in place of the sincere policy and concerted action.  New Zealand must take to drive down our emissions. I am very firmly of the view that climate change threatens our world and our communities, that the production of greenhouse gas emissions by people is its cause, that New Zealand must act to reduce our emissions, and, of course, that Parliament has a solemn responsibility to take steps to achieve that. Of course the National Party is on board with the global mission to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Debbie Ngarewa Packer Co leader of Te Paati Maori Party referred to “protecting Mother Earth (Goddess Gaia) and Father (Sky) and a multitude of descendants, tribes and sub-tribes that descended from the Gods through to the Treaty of Waitangi, thus supporting the motion of the Climate Emergency

In 2018 the IPCC released a landmark report that there is 12 years left to limit climate catastrophe. (Science is settled) Packer said. As she spoke about the $300 million fund to support Maori Farmers to transition to regenerative agricultural methods. NOTE: The London School of Economics and Political Science reported 7^th February 2018 ‘More Flaws in Estimates of the Economic Impacts Of Climate Change. Is fundamentally misleading and contains apparent mistakes. Prof Toi was a coordinating lead author of the IPCC Report in 2014, criticism of Toi stated he attempted to estimate the best-fir line. Several outside reviewers involved in the process expressed concern that estimates were not meaningful. Prof Toi ‘The Economic Impacts of Climate Change’ published 12^th January 2018 by the ‘Review of Environmental Economics and Policy’ that provided an update to the survey in the in the  published IPCC Report.  It was found that based on 27 estimates from 22 studies listed in the 2018 IPCC Report concluded that “the welfare impacts of initial warming are positive”. However upon close examination it was revealed the finding was unsound, based on outweighing of a single outlier study that was more than 15 years old, that had sloppy errors, like Professor Toi previous papers. (This is the report that Debbie Packer embraced as she spoke about a $300 million fund for Indigenous farmers)

LINKS AND REFERENCES

AN ANTI-SCIENCE POLITICAL TACTIC ‘ A GLOBAL AGENDA TO CONTROL PEOPLE, PLANET FOR A VERY WEALTHY PROFIT’ AND NOT A SINGLE COW WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. ‘THIS IS A CASH COW’

1. Fred Singer, President The Science & Environmental Policy Project Fairfax, Va. Further SEPP links to the controversy: http://www.sepp.org/science-editorials.cfm? whichcat=Organizations&whichsubcat=International%20Panel%20on%20Climate%20Change% 20(IPCC)#A72

LINK:  https://friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=2237 3 pages

https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/reform-science-system-build-better-future-new-zealand

https://www.mbie.govt.nz/assets/te-ara-paerangi-future-pathways-white-paper-2022.pdf 76 pages

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20201202_20201202_08

https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/more-flaws-in-estimates-of-the-economic-impacts-of-climate-change/

Reported NZ Herald 8^th May 2019: Climate targets involve huge changes to NZ’s agriculture sector . The Government  commits to what is called a “split target” – aiming to reduce all greenhouse gas emissions, aside from biogenic methane, to net zero by 2050. Methane from livestock is NOT exempt. The NZ Herald and government propaganda machine says Insurance because of sea level rises could cause billions of damage to tens of thousands of building. (The FEAR TACTIC used for COMPLIANCE and a reason to put your insurance price up) NOTE : The NZ Herald reported that ‘Insurers welcome the move’. More of your money going into those business pockets of corporation and large businesses. Follow the money, always follow the money.

The Herald article also states ‘ including reducing those gas emitting animals to reduce animal emissions.  Ardern called this as  “our generation’s nuclear-free moment”. Luxon is also a climate alarmist activist. At the time Ardern stated “New Zealanders have demanded her piece of Climate Change Legislation”. Ardern also stating that there is a consensus that has been built in Parliament ‘creating for a 30 year plan which provides the certainty industries need to get in front of the challenge’. (The whole of government Net Zero Approach) Which is said to be legally binding on the government.

NOTE: The NZ Herald reported that the Climate Change Bill was well thrashed out with the three governing bodies at the time they were Labour, Greens and NZ First. National Party was also involved for conducting the negotiations in good faith. The Zero Carbons Legislation is reported to have opposition support as well as of that of the whole government. In November 2019 National’s Todd Muller, Simon Bridges and Shaw met to discuss the Bill

THE POLITICAL CRONIES REFER TO NIWA: The Insurance Council said research from NIWA suggested 125,600 buildings would be hit by a sea level rise of between zero and one metre. These buildings would cost $38 billion to replace. They refer to a ‘Near Certainty’

NIWA: STUFF NEWS reported THAT THE COURT CHALLENDED NIWA BUT THE University of Otago pro Vice Chancellor of Sciences said that this weas stupid of the court to challenge NIWA (Aug 22^nd 2010). NIWA is NZ’s State owned weather and atmospheric research body. NIWA was challenged over its so called accuracy of its data used to calculate global warming. It was alleged that NIWA has adjusted its records to show a warming trend of 1 DegC., however the NZ Meteorological Service had shown no warming during the past century. NIWA’s data was based on a 1981 Student Thesis, the student was Jim Salinger, a NIWA employee was later sacked after talking to news media without permission.

Here we go again the fear mongering of the propaganda machine that works collaboratively with these political cronies in Wellington – Newshub reports 22^nd August 2019. ‘New NIWA study shows that 800,000 Kiwi’s at risk of flooding in coastal area’s. Come on people why are the wealthy purchasing properties on the coast. New apartments being built almost on the shoreline. The way these reporters write their reimagines its like a Court Victim Impact Statement for Manslaughter.

NOTE: NZ Herald recently reported that ‘Safari Group to create 46 room hotel in prime seaside location in Paraparaumu Beach. The Councils that are pushing the climate doom and gloom of the rising seas may talk the talk but do not walk the walk. ‘Kapiti Coast District Council sold joint plots of land at 26-29 Marine Parade, these had been acquired in 2019 to support development and growth (The council purchased land by the seas,  eem it was said the seas are rising), why would you then purchase land by the sea for development and growth. Uh! ) to experienced hotel and apartment developer Safari Group Ltd.,

The Safari Group have 20 projects under way or completed across NZ including thee in the Wellington region. The Council goes on to say “A key part of our vision for growing the value of Kapiti’s visitor economy is positioning Paraparaumu Beach as an entry point into our visitor experience.”.

(Emm- but isn’t the sea rising and property by the sea is at risk of being seriously damaged by the rising sea???)

RED FLAGS FLYING RIGHT NOW, IN FACT THEY HAVE BEEN FLYING FOR SOME TIME NOW, MAY HAVE TO GET ANOTHER FLAG POLE AS THESE RED FLAGS KEEP ON INCREASING.

OBAMA’S ZOMBIE’S: Anyone ever read about Obama’s Zombies on Climate Alarmism. The advise people to buy pet camels and to shelter under them. (The Earth Day Book) .. Crazy Shite… Pity anyone having to pick up that Camel Shite. LOL

LINKs: Do Not Use the Brackets (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4026553/Court-challenge-to-Niwa-stupid)

(https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/climate-change-plan-government-unveils-details-of-ambitious-zero-carbon-act/DGO7NS56BP2BOQSGNP25I2JFZI/?c_id=1&objectid=12228845

The globalized call to decolonize Nation States, flying the banner of decolonization, utilizing the terminologies that include ‘diversity-equity-inclusion’ as they analyze their very biased aggressiveness. Tension over harmony, separatism over unity, self determination of one revolutionary groups over all others in the majority group.  Bad storms, wet weather, cold, hot Maori are more effected than anyone else in New Zealand this is what academics write.

Northern Regional Council New Zealand on government website report Māori are largely employed in primary industries, which are vulnerable to likely weather extremes such as extended droughts, flooding, salt water in water tables, and tidal inundation. This may directly impact whānau incomes. Climate change makes Maori more vulnerable, impacts on the Marae Climate Change. Government Dept Te Puni Koriki – Understanding climate hazards for hapori Maori.

Māori hit harder because of  rising seas NZ Herald 18/4/2021 need for managed retreat for Maori. Just how does that work when ‘An Auckland iwi is putting its hand up to buy part of the city’s waterfront if Ports of Auckland operations are moved to Northland.’. Iwi long lease of land plan to build waterfront Māori at Te Atatu.  Waterfront site. The acquisition last year comprises around 250 hectares and … Hapai is an iwi-owned property fund that currently has 20 iwi investors.

We as New Zealanders need to call a halt of this de-colonization of New Zealand. All New Zealanders are Migrants, whether you arrived in New Zealand first or last. Race based policies, race based decolonization cause a destructive social impact

This is why I support Seymour’s’ Treaty Bill. I urge more people to try walking on what is called broken glass, you get used to it and after a short while its painless and very empowering to speak your inner voice.

Coercion is not the freedom to choose, it is threatening, influences the individual under pressure to do something they do not want to do, gives no alternatives (No alternative medicines) Coercion can affect ones mental, emotional, physical medical health spiritual wellbeing, make people feel disempowered, powerless

Ardern’s ‘Stay in your bubble’ Isolationism for the most vulnerable risks suicidal thoughts, suicide itself. Coercion can cause serious harm and even death. Classifying the COVID19 jabs as vaccines being a way of deliberately vilifying them, they are not vaccines. Coercion was legally morally justified b y the govt and their collaborators.

Doctors, medical professionals allowed themselves to be coerced hence violating the Medical Code of Practice “Firstly do no harm” The fragmentation of the doctor – patient relationship. Doctors whom refused to comply were punished removed from practicing medicine. The Marxist, Socialist Communistic ‘coercion’ of society embedded in the Communistic Manifesto

Marxism believes that medical doctors, medical professionals hide the real causes of illness by focusing on the individual and their medical symptoms. Thus Pandemics through a Marxist lens.

Coercion being extremely evident during the COVID19 mandates, restrictions. Individuals giving up their individual rights for the collective- common good for all. The ‘private ownership of your body’ where ones personal freedom to choose as to what to consume was influenced by mandatory forms of indoctrination, manipulation, blackmail, coercion.

No Jab-No Job. No Jab-No visit elderly relatives. No Jab as Ardern announced “If you want to go enjoy your summer holiday- to nightclubs, restaurants, musical – sporting events etc., you must get your jab. (In other words “If you don’t you want enjoy yourself as you usually do with family and friends whom are very important to you) Coercion.

Giving up Individual Rights with no alternatives. Individualism kicked to the gutter for collectivist Marxist, Socialist Communism . Destroying businesses, the loss of jobs (Communist Manifesto) Abolishing the fruits of ones own labour’. The  ‘UNITE AGAINGST COVID’ signage, billboards, advertising, propaganda on mainstream media.

Much like the Socialist political slogan ‘Workers United’ which is the rallying cry within the Communist Manifesto (Karl Marx  & Friedrich Engels1848).  Literally ‘Proleterians Of All Countries UNITE,  becoming popularized in English, became the  ‘Workers of the World Unite’  2020 ‘UNITE AGAINST COVID’.

Ardern, the govt the ‘only source of the truth’. Socialism, communism does no seek to tell or to  modify the truth, but overthrows the truth. Communism abolishes external truths, Christianity, Morality, Family. Like Nazi Germany National Socialism the propaganda machine suppressed the people by censorship. Propaganda to control the opposition

Censorship and the abridgement of ‘freedom of speech’ has been very evidential. Control ideology, to control thoughts and actions, the COVID19 Thought Police- Disinformation, misinformation initiative. Restricting ‘free speech’ The Communist Manifesto abolishing individual freedoms and rights.

Karl Marx statement 1875 refers to the ‘Essence of Force and Coercion’. A State centered transition between ‘Capitalism and Communism which is of course Socialism (The Communistic  society) A brutal oppression that leads to ‘economic stagnation’.

Out of COVID Pandemic emerged the toxicity of revolutionary minority groups demanding their individual rights over the majority of the population, also centered on collectivism,  coercion, identity politics, critical theory, critical race theory. Individuals giving up their individual rights by stealth, ideology with Marxist roots

The irresistible revolution, Marxism’s goal of conquest- a ‘neo-Marxist agenda. Namely DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs that have become massively embedded throughout businesses, industries, NGO’s, Govt, Academia, Universities, Military, Police. Costing each entity that adopts DEI  Certification $12,000 per year for Assessments which are ongoing from year to year at $12,000 annually for the embedded DEI Rainbow Tick. (Again a Marxist Agenda)

The Rainbow Tick  Certification of the Workplace is owned, belongs to Te Whatua  Ora Te Toka Tumai.- Ngati Whatua.  Again two classes of people, businesses– those with the Rainbow Tick and those without-Identity Politics. Just like the Pandemic Mandatory Jans- classified two classes of peoples Jabbed and Un-jabbed.

Advancing Social Justice through Diversity Equity, Inclusion. Collectivism.. Cancel Culture. Identity Political, Critical Theories, Critical Race Theories. The Equity delusion with its Marxist Roots. DEI Diversity Equity Inclusion rehashing Communism’s slogan . Diversity and Inclusion 2 sides of the same coin.

Diversity is the goal, inclusion policies exist to make diversity happen. Diversity demands conformity and inclusion, delivers the necessary conformity by exclusion. Does this remind you of the Marxist Socialist Communist coercion that was implemented in the mandating of COVID19 Jabs.? The weaponization for collectivist rewards and punishments.  Equity is a failed delusion, does not have a desired outcome. Marxism understands this, state sponsored confiscations again the Communist Manifesto.

Communism does not seek to modify truth, but to overthrow it. But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality. Marx 1875 statement is the essence of force and coercion , the state centered transition phase between capitalism and communism which is of course ‘socialism’, the communistic society. Leads to Economic stagnation. This is what we see worldwide.

Researcher: Carol Sakey