How the United Nations is quietly being turned into a public-private partnership

A new agreement with the World Economic Forum gives multinational corporations influence over matters of global governance.

Harris Gleckman

Anew corporate and government marriage quietly took place last week when the leadership of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to partner with each other. While this MOU is proudly displayed on the WEF website, it is nowhere to be found on the UN website. The only indication on the UN website of this important new development is a picture of the pen used to sign the agreement, and two pictures of the signing ceremony.

One reason for this difference is that the UN’s corporate-centered Global Compact has received a good deal of bad press. Now the new WEF-UN agreement creates a second special place for multinational corporations inside the UN. There is no similar institutional homes in the UN system for civil society, for academics, for religious leaders, or for youth. It is hard to imagine a national government signing a similar formal partnership with one of its business organizations.

At the same time, the UN is under pressure from Donald Trump who wants to deconstruct the whole multilateral system. For Trump, dismantling the international system built after World War II is a companion piece to his domestic effort at deconstructing the administrative state. For the Secretary-General of the UN, the pact with the WEF may well be his effort to find new power actors who can support the current system, which is now celebrating its 75th anniversary, in the face of Trump’s onslaught.

On the other side, the WEF recently received significant public criticism after giving Hungarian Prime Minister Orban and Brazilian President Bolsonaro a warm welcome at its 2019 Davos gathering. This marriage may be seen as a way for the WEF to re-establish itself as part of the global governance center.

The timing and managing of public perceptions are not the only interesting aspect of this arrangement. In 2009, the WEF published a 600 page report entitled the Global Redesign Initiative, which called for a new system of global governing, one in which the decisions of governments could be made secondary to multistakeholder led initiatives in which corporations would play a defining role. In a sense this WEF study recommended a sort of public-private United “Nations” – something that has now been formalized in this MOU. The agreement announces new multistakeholder partnerships to deliver public goods in the fields of education, women, financing, climate change, and health.

The rather detailed MOU includes forms of cross organizational engagement up and down the UN structure. The MOU contains commitments that the Secretary-General himself will be invited to deliver a keynote address at the WEF annual Davos gatherings. His senior staff and the heads of the UN programmes, funds, and agencies will also be invited to participate in regional level meetings hosted by the WEF. It also contains a promise that the UN’s individual country representatives will explore ways to work with WEF’s national Forum Hubs. Aware of the mutual importance of public legitimacy each institution can provide for the other, the MOU also contains an agreement to cross-publicize their joint activities.

Besides the institutional blessing of the United Nations, what does the WEF get from the MOU? The scope of each of the five fields for joint attention is narrowed down from the intergovernmentally negotiated and agreed set of goals to one with more in line with the business interests of WEF members. So under financing, the MOU calls only for ‘build[ing] a shared understanding of sustainable investing’ but not for reducing banking induced instabilities and tax avoidance.

Under climate change, it calls for ‘ …public commitments from the private sector to reach carbon neutrality by 2050’, not actions that result in carbon neutrality by 2030 . Under education, it re-defines the Sustainable Development education goal to ‘ensure inclusive and equitable quality education’ into one that focuses on education to meet the ‘rapidly changing world of work.’ The MOU explicitly restricts the WEF from making financial contributions to the UN, which might have ameliorated the economic impact of some of Trump’s threat to the budgets of the UN system. At the same time, it avoids any commitment to reduce global inequality, to make energy affordable, to hold multinational corporations accountable for human rights violations, or even to rein in the behavior of the WEF’s firms that act inconsistently to the re-defined goals set out in the agreement.

All this joint work might have some practical good if it were not for three crucial elements: firstly, the agreement circumvents the intergovernmental review process; secondly, the agreement elevates multistakeholderism as the solution to the problems with the current multilateral system; and thirdly the proposed multistakeholder partnerships are not governed by any formal democratic system. Were the Secretary-General convinced of the wisdom of a UN marriage with the WEF, he could have submitted the draft MOU for approval by the member states. Instead, the Secretary-General joined the WEF in declaring in effect that multistakeholder groups without any formal intergovernmental oversight are a better governance system than a one-country-one-vote system.

All multistakeholder governance groups are largely composed of a self-selected group of multinational corporations and those organizations and individuals that they want to work with. They work without any common internal rule book to protect the views of all who might be impacted by the group. Participation in multistakeholder group is a voluntary undertaking. The drop-in-drop-out arrangements are antithetical to the UN’s efforts for 75 years to build a stable secure global governance system with a clear understanding of obligations, responsibilities and liabilities.

What is surprising is that by accepting this marriage arrangement with the WEF, the Secretary-General of the UN is marginalizing the intergovernmental system in order to ‘save’ it.

Open Democracy 2nd July 2019

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/how-united-nations-quietly-being-turned-public-private-partnership/?source=in-article-related-story

...

Global Governance Blog Posts View all Categories

ECO Socialist Multistakeholder Public Private Global Partnership with the UN-WEF ‘Corporate Capture of the World’ and the Global Godfather of Climate Hysteria

Maurice Strong the Godfather of Climate Hysteria. The self proclaimed Socialist Climate Change Inventor, that defined a trace gas as a very wealthy meal ticket of tens of thousands of climate functionalities

Maurice Strong established two of the largest UN Environmental Agencies.  Maurice Strong Personal Advisor to  UN Secretary Generals. Maurice Strong quoted at the UN “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about”? Quote Maurice Strong UN. The Science is settled “No its not:. Maurice Strong Self confessed socialist had a massive influence on world affairs, international environmental rules, international agencies and businesses, an influential member of the WEF

Maurice Strong joined the UN at 18years old lived with a leader of the UN Treasury. Eventually put the UN into the collaboration with environmental businesses. The shadowy influence of the UN Leaders from 1962 till 2005, often clled ‘the international man of mystery’  and a ‘new guy in your future’ and a very dangerous one at that. Strong made his fortune in oil and energy eg Petro Canada, Power Corporation, CalTex Africa, Hydro Canada, the Colorado Land and Cattle Company, Ajax Petroleum, Canadian Industrial Oil and Gas— to name just a few. He had an extensive range of contacts within the power brokers of the world, he was called the ‘Michelangelo of Networking’ but he was not angel.

1972 organized the 1st Earth Summit in Stockholm The Conference on the Human Environment. This led to the formation of the UN Environment Program Maurice Strong was the head of this. Later he organized the UNEP, he was the boss of the first international expert group on climate change. This led to UN sponsored organizations eg The Earth Council and Earth Charter, World Resources Institute, World Wild Life Fund, The Commission for World Governance and the University for Peace.

Strong was the driving force behind the world governance, governing of UN Nation States . He dreamt up a world tax on monetary transactions of 0.05% which would have given the UN an annual income of $1.5 trillion annually. About equal to the income of the US. However the stumbling block was the UN Security Council that has veto rights. (The power of Veto). So he devised a plan to get rid of the UN Security Council but did not succeed in implementing his plan. And then he came up with this light bulb moment called ‘Global Warming’, this might just be the device to get his World Governance up and running.

1989 Strong was appointed to Secretary General of the Earth Summit, 1992 he addressed the second Earth Summit at Rio. Telling 1,000’s of climate change delegates

“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable”.

Hence there goes the house (private Property) there goes your Meat  (plant based burgers) Bill Gates ‘Beyond Burgers’, the transformation of the world called ‘The World we Want’ being the world the Corporation- UN-WEF Collaborators want.  (Global Power and wealth)

However Strong did not say at this time he had actually purchased a very large piece of land in Colorado. The Colorado Land and Cattle Company, he bought this off an arms dealer named Adnan Khashoggi who had strong connections with the Bin Laden family

200,000 acres of cattle property called ‘Baca’ It sat on a vast underground water system. Strong formed the American Water Development Corporation to exploit the water by pumping it out for commercial intent but was stopped by locals. Maurice Strong was told by a mystic that : The Baca Ranch would become the new planetary order which would evolve from the economic collapse and environmental catastrophes that would sweep the world in years to come”

With this, he created the Manitou Foundation, a New Age Institute which was located at his Baca Rach, above what he called the saced waters that lay below. He established the ‘Conservation Fund’ with the help of Laurence Rockefeller, to study the mystical properies of the Manitou Mountaun. A circular temple was built at the ranch devoted to the world mystical movements

The valley where the Baca Ranch is located is traditional home of the Navajo tribes. They believe that their ancestors were led underground in this valley by ‘Ant People’. According to the Navajo tradition they warned of the coming ‘Sky Katchinas’ (Sky spirits’. Strong was drawn towards these Navajo mystical beliefs. Maurice Strong founded the Earth Council Institute in 1992, recruiting world luminaries eg., Mikhail Gorbachev, Shimon Peres, Al Gore and David Rockefeller. In year 2000 Earth Charter Strong again pushed for a World Governance body.

2005 Maurice Strong, an extremely powerful man made a push which he announced would save humanity, the promoting of the theory of human induced greenhouse gases, but he was caught with his hand in the till. He endorsed a chque for himself made out to M Strong issued by the Jordanian Bank. The South Korean businessman Tongsun Park was given the cheque, he was convicted in 2006 by a New York Federal Court of conspiring to bribe  UN Officials

Maurice Strong resigned and then fled to Canada, then onto China where he continued to live. Taking sanctuary in China where his cousin Louise Strong, a Marxist who lived with Mao Tse Tung for 2 years before she died in 1970.

In 1947 Maurice Strong  worked at the UN at the age of 18 a Canadian from Manitoba, he was a junior officer at the UN Security Section, he lived with the UN Treasurer Noah Monod. Maurice Strong was involved in bribery and corruption, a very well known one was the Un Oil for Food Scandal. Strong was stripped of many of his 53 International Awards and honours he had collected over a lifetime for this. Strong was known for his dual role of an eco global socialist pushing for a world governance and he was also reported to be a ruthless businessman

Maurice Strong was a longtime Foundation Director of the World Economic Forum, a senior advisor to the World Bank. A Canadian Oil- Mineral Businessman, Under Secretary of the UN, President of the Power Corporation of Canada, Secretary of the Un Human Environment Programme, CEO of Petro Canada, Headed Ontario Hydro. Head of the Water Development Incorporated, Commissioner of the World Commission on environmental Developments, Leader of International environmental Movements worldwide.

An active member of Perking University, Chairman of the Advisory Board for the Institute for Research on Security and Sustainability for North East Asia. Died at 86 in 2015. Self confessed radical Socialist. There are references made to Maurice Strong and Canada’s Principal Investment Corporations that have interests in Energy and Utility Businesses. The Power Corporation of Canada. In 1976 at Pierre Trudeau request Maurice Strong returned to Canada to head the newly created national oil company Petro-Canada.

Strong was a shareholder in Oil companies, he had acquired Denver Oil was the largest shareholder. AZL merged with Tosco Corporation which Strong acquired which was 160,000 acres – the Baca Ranch in Colorado which was Strongs Manitou Foundation. Strong later became the chairman of the Canada Development Investment Corporation, the holding company for some of Canada’s principal government owned corporations. 1982 he became chair of Ontario Hydro.

Dec 3st 1986 Strong founded the American Water Development Incorporated, with a rights to pump water from a guge area and sell it to water districts in the Front Range Urban Corridor of Colorado. (There was much conflict about this and activism) So Strong existed the company. Strong was the director of Molten Metal Technology, an environmental tech company founded in 1989, recycling hazardous waste gained research grants from US Dept of Energy. The company later filed for bankruptcy.’ Stockholm Conference

In 1971, Strong commissioned a report on the state of the planet, Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet,[25] co-authored by Barbara Ward and Rene Dubos. The report summarized the findings of 152 leading experts from 58 countries in preparation for the first UN meeting on the environment, held in Stockholm in 1972. This was the world’s first “state of the environment” report.

The Stockholm Conference established the environment as part of an international development agenda. It led to the establishment by the UN General Assembly in December 1972 of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), with headquarters in NairobiKenya, and the election of Strong to head it. UNEP was the first UN agency to be headquartered in the third world.[26] As head of UNEP, Strong convened the first international expert group meeting on climate change.[27]

Strong was one of the commissioners of the World Commission on Environment and Development, set up as an independent body by the United Nations in 1983.

Maurice Strong the Godfather of Climate Hysteria. A longtime foundation Director of the WEF, on the advisory committee of Harvard University, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Maurice Strong flanked by 100 world leaders embodied in Agenda 21 launchpad. The design of the global governance and Mass Global Warming hysteria that has now evolved into a ECO Socialist Multistakeholder Public Private Global Partnership with the UN-WEF ‘Corporate Capture of the World. WEF GLOBAL REDESIGN INIATIVE. THE GREAT RESETTHE NEW NORMAL – THE GLOBAL AGENDA 2030- TO LEAVE NO-ONE BEHINDEVERYONE EVERYWHERE AT EVERY AGEORIGINATED BY THE SHADOW OF THE MOST POWERFUL LEADERS OF THE UNNONE OTHER THAN MAURICE STRONG.THE GLOBAL GOD FATHER OF CLIMATE HYSTERIA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong

 https://coherence.com.au/curlew/2019/08/maurice-strong-inventor-of-global-warming/

 

...
Carol Sakey
Global Governance

A TOP DOWN DYSTOPIAN GLOBAL HEALTH GOVERNANCE

The WHO (UN) International Health Regulations are reported to be the most important multilateral treaty that regulates the global architecture for Health, Emergency, Preparedness, Response and Resilience (HEPR Architecture). Amendment to the WHO (UN) International Health Regulations, and a new  WHO International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) will be introduced at the World Health Assembly in May 2024. Both Helen Clark and Ashley Bloom has been in Geneva working on the Pandemic Treaty and the WHO IHR 2005 Regulations.  Ashley Bloomfield represented as Co chair for the West Pacific Region. Helen Clark Co Chair of the WHO International Pandemic Treaty working council.

The WHO International Health Regulations are being amended by unelected bureaucrats representing UN Nation States. There are major concerns about the Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the IHR 2005 Regulations. Particularly as to the enormous extended powers of the World Health Organization (UN). Art 12 (1) of the IHR 2005 gives the Director General of WHO (UN) sweeping powers to declare a Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) otherwise known as an ‘Extraordinary Event’ which is determined to constitute a ‘Public Health Risk’ to other States.

A new category has been added to the IHR 2005 namely  ‘Intermediate Public Health Alert’ requiring ‘Heightened International Awareness’ of an undefined low threshold (Proposed in Article 12 (6) safeguards WHO against any  accusation of their powers to abuse the global system of Health preparedness and response. (Immunity). The Director General of WHO in response to such emergencies is to issue recommendations to States to adopt  Medical and Non-medical countermeasures this can have  far reaching implications on livelihoods, health, human rights and the economy of Member States. (Articles 15-17 and 48-49)

This can fast track, trigger development of a global distribution of unlicensed  investigational diagnostics, jabs through the WHO Emergency Use Listing Procedure (EULP). The fast tracking of emergency human trials (guineapig states). Proposed amendments (Art 12 (1)  9 and 10 increases the WHO powers over UN Nation States. Restricts States Sovereign Rights to legislate and implement legislation in pursuance of health policies set out in Article 3 (4) IHR. Also relies on the WHO powers to assess an alleged ‘Global Health Risk’ by relying on information outside of official channels. Thus giving UN Nation States only 24 hrs to verify WHO information to collaborate with the allegations that WHO have made, even if those allegations are unjustified.2

Who guards Who here, who guards the Human Rights, Freedoms of the people to voluntary consent? As citizens of NZ we should be highly concerned about losing our freedoms and rights to ‘Self- determination’ as a Sovereign Nations. The people are the Sovereign Nation. Those that reside behind the closed doors of Parliament are our servants not vice versa.  New Zealand’s I urge you to seek open public debate from those in Parliament because “if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck it probably is a duck”. We have Zilch transparency, no responsibility or accountability shown by those politicians.. the secrecy remains around the WHO Global Health Agenda. This certainly appears to be a top down dystopian dictatorship

A Global Health Architecture that covers everything in life on this earth through the embedded ‘One Health Approach’ that is entrenched in the International Health Regulations and the International Pandemic Treaty (Accord), this also includes compliance and obedience to the UN WHO Director General calling an Emergency Global Boiling Emergency (I kid you not) The ‘One Health Approach’. The control, management of ALL Human , Animals- wild and domestic, oceans, seas, rivers, estuaries, soil, plant life the whole Eco-System’. A top down unelected technocratic bureaucratic global health governance that make decisions over everyone’s lives. Using the COVID 19 Pandemic to justify this.

NZ’s members of Parliament are voted in, entrusted by the people, the people are the Sovereignty of NZ. They are put their to protect and  safeguard our freedoms, human rights, our country’s sovereign rights as a Nation State. There is no voice for the people to challenge this Global Health Governance in the public arena. Why would you trust these unelected bureaucratic, technocratic when they cannot even admit to the serious harms and deaths of all those people whom have died , seriously harmed by the ‘Human Guinea Pig Trials’ that they have supported and promoted (NZrs being used as Lab Rats). And still the COVID Jabs are rolling out.

We are looking at the WHO (UN) Director General having huge powers to monitor 194 UN Nation States populations, enabled by the political bureaucrats in Wellington. Helen Clark Foundation advisory to the Govts policy making. And Ashley Bloomfield look at their history do you trust them? A Mechanism exists called ‘The Compliance Committee and Universal Peer Review Mechanism’ refers to mechanisms to restructure our domestic health systems and the allocations of our domestic health budgets around ‘Pandemic Surveillance, preparedness & response activities. Global decision making over UN Nations States eg NZ. Through these Global Health Governance, the huge powers of the Director General of the Un and the unelected  Bureaucrats, Technocrats of UN Nation  States the proposals include a stronger push globally for immunizations (lots more lab rats- human clinical trials). With more of this authorities touting of the corrupt lying of  ‘Benefits are far greater than Risks’.. do you really trust this..

We know they are lying, they know- we know they are lying- but they just keep on lying’. Do you call this transparency.. I personally call this criminal and corrupt.  March 2022 the World Health Org., (UN) requested that ALL UN Member State authorities classify, count ‘All deaths that take place within 28 days of an individual obtaining a COVID19 test are to be classified as a COVID19 Death.  A police officer shoots and kills a man in New Lynn, this is recorded as a COVID19 death. Surely this actually is a way of masking COVID19 Jab deaths and also other deaths such as Suicide.?? New Zealand has a great reputation on the global stage for being a country of Human Lab Rats. For Human Clinical Trials  there must be many different ethic groups. NZ Fits the picture and all in one basket a small populated country on the other side of the world. NZ has the advantage over other countries.

NZ is the first country to see the first light of day. NZ lacks many medical drugs and some are too expensive for many NZrs to obtain. (Therefore NZrs make good guinea-pigs). Human Clinical Trials time wise much  quicker in NZ, therefore much cheaper than other countries. The government has been putting much more funding into Research over the last few years Research in New Zealand is funded by Government Grants, Scholarships, Corporations and Private Companies, also Global and NZ Foundations, Trusts, Charities and other Institutions. In 2020 alone NZ Government spent $1 billion on research and development in several sectors.

The MPI (Govt) have an annual Research Budget of $130 million. MBIE (Govt 2021 budget in research $56.12 million. The Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) in 2020 $50 million for Research and Universities NZ  funding on top of this is unknown. On top of this is Non-Government funding for Research Agriculture research funded by Dairy NZ, Zoetis Ltd., Corporation Ltd and Meat & Wool NZ Ltd.,  of course there are others too. There are huge amounts of funding being put into Animal Free Agriculture.

University of Invercargill received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates lends a hand to Massey University Research into Ebola. The Global Cabal are making their mark locally…Gates Foundation funds research reports the Beehive (21/9/2020) $$27 million. (Speaker of the House is Winston Peters). He was referring to COVID19 Jabs development through global COVAX Facility. Peters said this will act as a pre-purchase of vax if successful. Winston Peters said “It’s important that all countries are able to access sufficient amounts of vaccines to protect their populations and contribute to getting the pandemic under control on a global level.

That “joining the COVAX Facility is complementary to other strands of COVID 19 Vax Strategy, which includes advance purchase arrangements with  pharmaceutical companies, investing in global research and increasing manufacturing capability” (Source Beehive Website) UN Member States are to vote on the amendments to the Health regulation and the International Pandemic Treaty behind closed doors, thus diminishing the right of Self-Determination of Democratic participation. Member States risk losing their sovereignty. WHO in two legal instruments include ‘non-questionable leadership in health matters. WHO will have mass power over ‘ Health Emergencies of Public Concern’ (Article 13 (a) )

Artic 13A A power of mass power of health emergencies of public concern ‘One Health Approach’ is every thing. Level of CO2. Permanent measures declared by the WHO. Will have the right to declare recommendations declare, impose all kinds of restrictions, experimental treatments.

Art 18 Non binding is eliminated and is now binding vaccination. Will be able to decide all information including censorship and surveillance. IHR and the new pandemic treaty. No-one can challenge the WHO whether it be govts or the people.. the imposing of the regime of experimental jabs. (A No Stop  Button) . Self declare, authorize itself a public health concern and impose it as long as they like. Surveillance of the people and of the member state. No science, no legal court proceedings, no court of justice, no scientific process- no democracy. Basic principle that we have as human beings the right to know what we consent to is diminished. IHR by definitions of WHO are qualified as Binding regulations. Originally were non-binding, this has been scrubbed out replaced with  Binding. Thus a violation of Informed Consent. Self Determination of the People.. ( referred to in UN Charter 1946.  Human Rights) not protected, no checks and balances. Benefits will always be recorded that Benefits over risks even if the risks are much greater. A dystopian dictatorship future

Article 1 of the IHR 2005 amendments reference  ‘Health Products including therapeutics, vaccines, medical devices, personal protective equipment, diagnostics, assistive products, cell and gene based therapies and their components, materials or parts.. health products that include medicines, health technologies and know how. Includes organized set or combination of knowledge, skills, health products, procedures, databases, systems developed to solve a health problem, those also related to development or manufacture of health products or their combination its application or usage ‘Health Technologies’ are interchangeably used as health care technologies will be imposed upon  by the power of WHO . What was non-binding advice is now crossed out to say Binding

A principle has been removed from the original IHR as to “full respect for the Dignity, Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Persons”. This has been replace with:-The implementation of these regulations shall be based on principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development. All rubber stamped by NZ Government,.

The WHO International Health Regulation Amendments and the WHO International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) Articles 13(3) and (4) equates to the World Health Org., (UN) Director General having huge powers over UN Member States during a PHEIC.By deleting the phrase “At the request of the State party” and replacing  ‘MAY’ with ‘SHALL’ assistance offered by the WHO to a  ‘state in the response to public health risks becomes the default option.  If a state does not accept such offers for assistance within two days, it must justify this by declaring the ‘public health rationale for the rejection’ to all other WHO member states, potentially resulting in far-reaching economic and financial consequences for the rejecting state.

WHO assistance offered includes ‘Mobilization of International Assistance’, including on-site assessments, supported further by suggested amendments to Article 15(2) IHR, allowing the WHO Director-General and the Emergency Committees set up by him/her to recommend ‘the deployment of expert teams’ to states experiencing a PHEIC.   The interfering powers violating Sovereign Rights of the people of the Nation State. 300 Amendments have been proposed to the IHR (WHO). All to be concluded in the World Health Assembly gathering in May 2023

LINKS

https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-far-reaching-us-proposals-to-amend-the-international-health-regulations-at-the-upcoming-75th-world-health-assembly-a-call-for-attention/

https://www.nzavs.org.nz/how-research-is-funded  https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/27million-investment-global-vaccine-facility

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...

CHURCH BELLS RANG FOR CLIMATE ALARMISM IN NEW ZEALAND ‘CORPORATE CAPTURE’ HAD BEGAN

23rd October 2009 The Mornington Methodist Church members were planning to ring their church bell 350 times over an hour, this was just one od six Dunedin Bells that would ring to support the 350th Day of Action. More than 4,000 events were taking place around the world on October 24th 2009 to encourage people to reduce their carbon emissions. 600 leaflets were distributed around a neighborhood in Dunedin. 350 Dunedin collective members groups as diverse as school pupils, musicians, artists, cyclists and skateboarders collaborated Dunedin’s Day Of Action to encourage Dunedin residents to reduce their fossil fuels.(Otago Daily Times 23/10/2009)

16th October 2008 (Pacific Scoop News) Ringing the Alarm on Climate Change (Release Anglian Church of Aotearoa. Church bells tolled up and down NZ on Saturday 24th October 2009. This was not a ‘civil defense emergency warning’. The church bells rang for the ‘350 Day’- global pointer to cut ‘carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere’. This was promoted by three Anglican Bishops. The Auckland Synod resolution was initiated by its Diocesan Climate Change Action Group, of which the convenor was Dr Richard Milne a Population Health Scientist. Milne said, at the time “remind church communities and individuals of the need to live more sustainably, to reduce their carbon footprint. He added “It’s particularly important, to make this statement before our government enters negotiations at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December”. The church gave a link to their website for further information on theology, science, economics, politics of global climate change (The link for the Diocesan Climate Change Action Group)

November 2009, at the Catholic Bishops Conference ‘Church leaders urged bolder action on climate change’  calling “political leaders to strive for a strong commitment by the international community at the Copenhagen Climate Summit” for the strongest commitment by the international community at the Copenhagen Summit. October 2009 following a meeting with the Prime Minister of NZ the church leaders from the Anglican, Catholic, Methodist, Presbyterian, Baptist Churches and the Salvation Army churches released a statement outlining the environmental & economic impacts of climate change, and the importance of immediate action by the whole community. They applauded the steps that the past and present govt had taken, but felt that the urgency of the situation is not sufficiently understood, they reported. Catholic Bishop John Drew Wellington said “The world is perched on the brink of a Kairos moment”, described as a moment in the scripture  that is a moment of opportunity, grace and truth”

Bishop Drew said that “Scientists warn us that the “window of opportunity for change is very narrow”. This “narrow window of opportunity, has been heard and noted many times”. 14th September 2022, 13 years later the World Economic Forum reports that the “UN announced “We have a narrow window of opportunity to create a better future for everyone”. They were referring to ‘global society lurching from crisis to crisis. All the church leaders in NZ joined the World Council of Churches as they called ALL churches throughout NZ to ring their church bells at 3pm Sunday 13th December, midway through the UN Summit in Copenhagen, to call people to prayer and action in the face of climate change

The ‘narrow window of opportunity’ repeats itself time and time again. The UN Website 20th March 2023 14 years later, after the Church in NZ announced the “narrow window of opportunity. A major Un Report referring to the IPCC Greenhouse Emissions, a human caused climate change yet another “narrow window of opportunity” is reported by the UN. 7th November 2022 at a High Level UN Meeting the UN Secretary General announced “We need all hands on deck for faster, bolder climate action. A window of opportunity remains open, but only a narrow shaft of light appears”. A Headline Statement for Policymakers worldwide by the IPCC 4th October 2023 :This is a rapidly closing window of opportunity. Climate Home News 4th October 2023 ‘ a course correction on COP28 negotiating table refers to the “Global  Community and the window of opportunity is rapidly closing”. 23rd April 2023 ‘Off the Charts Records’ Has Humanity finally broken. “However, a tiny window of opportunity remans open to tackle global warming”

Yes the ‘Narrow Window Of Opportunity” has been repeated time and time again. What is this window of opportunity, I have asked myself, through the many hours and years of research I have done? I personally believe “it’s the destruction of the Global Free-market Enterprise Economy’. The exploitation of corporate multi-stakeholderism of Sovereign Nation States. The implanting of destroying Nation States to bring about a One World Governance under what is called Globalization’. The window of opportunity for Multi-stakeholder  Corporate wealth.. the Corporate Capture of the worlds economy, the massive transformation of populations throughout the world.. ‘The WEF/UN Great Reset’

The capitalist marketplace that is characterized by the dominance of hierarchical bureaucratic corporations. As Schwab announced to the world “Time for a Great Reset 3rd June 2020, he was then referring to the Global COVID crisis as n opportunity to build more sustainable systems. People Planet and Profit. A very wealthy profit for self interested corporations, large businesses. The Austrian Institute reported on 2nd June 2022 “The narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine and reset our world, we need a better capitalism. Namely ‘Corporate Capitalism’. Corporate Capture

The Globe and Mail reported “Its Time For A Massive Reset of Capitalism 3rd June 2020. The pandemic represents a “rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimaging and reset our world”. (Not Our World But Their World). Harvard Business Review ‘Making Stakeholder Capitalism a Reality.22nd January 2020, spurred by Climate Change (Financing and Investing). As they report that ‘Larry Fink ‘BlackRock’, the worlds largest investor with $7 trillion in asset management. Reporting that his CEO’s received their annual letter “placing long term sustainability at the centre of his investment approach”, as the World Economic Forum kicks off the week as they update their manifesto, for the first time since 1973 saying “business must be the stewards of the environment, global supply chains referring to sustainable shareholders”

13th June 2019  (6 months prior to the global pandemic) the World Economic Forum and the UN signed an official partnership memorandum. This would give much more political clout and wealth for the UN to achieve its Global Development Goals of Agenda 2030. This being a trade off, as the corporations represented by the WEF would then be the whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies. The enabling of a One World Corporate captured Governance

In the wake of the COVID 19 Pandemic, transnational corporations sought to cement their control of the global governance, ensuring they served the interests of large businesses, corporations- for a very wealthy profit rather than the wellbeing of humanity. Transnational corporations are directly responsible for many global crises we face. As we view Corporate Capture in various forums throughout the world. This is a governance, the evolution of a parallel ‘privatized multilateralism’ made up of a myriad of ‘multistakeholder’ bodies.

The World Economic Forum has developed, pushed for privatization of global governance for decade. The ‘Great Reset’ is just the latest of the gradual corporate takeover of global institutions, such as the UN and other international bodies, that take critical decisions over the governance of global common goods such as food, water, health, internet and others.

Civil Society Groups in 2021 produced an open letter opposing plans for a Big Tech dominated Body for Global Digital Governance’ (Source of Information ‘Transnational Institute’). As for the churches supporting, ringing the bells in NZ, many have stated that “Christians have a particular duty to address the moral and human implications of climate change’. The Pope declared heavy criticism at climate deniers and delayers.  He called them “skeptics and irresponsible” (CNN 4th October 2023)

However George Pell saw climate science as a dangerous religious dogma  (The Guardian 13th January 2023). The Guardian reported that Cardinal George Pell left a legacy of ‘climate science denial’ which meant in his later years he became more distanced from his position in the Catholic Church. Cardinal Pell, for decades in newspaper columns and speeches “popularized climate denial, dismissed global heating, branded environmentalists as hysterical and in the grip of a pseudo-religion”. In one 2011 interview with the Catholic media Pell said “In the past, pagans sacrificed animals and even humans in vain attempts to placate capricious and cruel Gods. Today they demand a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions”. Pell often announced that “Climate change was mostly natural and the science is not settled”

Professor Tim Stephens an International Environmental Law expert wrote that “ Pell was prolific, wrote many climate denial pieces. He said that Pell was “ caught up in the right wing cultural view of climate change being a hoax or a conspiracy”. Cardinal Pell died in Rome aged 81, he used his position as Australia’s most senior Catholic to forcefully reject the Climate  Crisis, the Guardian reported. On the eve of the Paris Climate conference in 2015, the former prime minister Kevin Rudd publicly challenged Pell, as Cardinal Pell was climbing the ranks of seniority in the Vatican. Rudd said “It was no small matter, that Pell was muddying the ethical waters with his radical climate skepticism”. But this did not stop Cardinal Pell criticizing the so called climate science”. Like all those real scientists whom publicly speak out about this Climate Alarmism, and the IPCC flawed, corrupt Assessment Reports, they are character assassinated, just as Cardinal Pell was. Public debate is soon shut down time and time again.

However Pope Francis in 2015 released his encyclical on the environment- Laudato Si- calling for global action on climate change to mitigate the risk of serious consequences for ecosystems and humanity. Forbes reported on 9th December 2020 that ‘Pope Francis with his Corporate Titans were to make Capitalism More Fair”.” Corporations to be Holier than thou”. Pope Francis’s virtual signaling to global populations worldwide. As he ignored the rest of society, jumped on the bandwagon of Lady Lynn De Forester Rothschild’s Corporate bandwagon. Yes, the pope spoke about the hundreds of millions of people in extreme poverty, he talked the talk but did not walk the walk. Pope Francis, the Vatican partnered with the Rothschild ‘Council for Inclusive Capitalism’ that boosts over $10.5 trillion in assets under management, companies with more than $2.1 trillion of market capitalization and 200 million workers in over 163 countries.

Members of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism’ calling themselves ‘Guardians’, these are top CEO’s of Corporations that include CEO’s of Mastercard, Dupont, Salesforce, Rothschild Inclusive Capital Partners, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, BP, Bank of America, the Rockefeller Foundation. These are the world’s top wealthiest elite. Key players of the World Economic Forum. The Corporate Capture of the World. Corporate Governance. Digital Governance. A One World Governance to control ALL populations worldwide.

Those church bells that tolled up and down NZ in 2009, should have been ringing for Corporate Alarmism, warning the people of New Zealand what was about to come. Communist Degrowth. Destruction of democracy, democratic states, totalitarian. The loss of the Free-market Enterprising economy- the freedom to choose. Replacing this for a Stakeholder Capitalism where peoples freedoms are seriously at stake. Today we have Eco Churches in NZ funded supported by Local Government.

Auckland Council website that refers to the WEF data. Klaus Schwab ‘4th Industrial Revolution’. Where did the caring churches of humanity go? Earlier this year I emailed the main churches in NZ requesting a ‘day of prayer’ for those jab injured, jab dead” and zilch.

The World Council of Churches that have collaborated with Governments, Authorities on mandatory COVID 19 Jabs, and the implementing of Climate Alarmism. The suffering of Eco Anxiety is reported by National Health in the UN, of the young and thevunerable. I have included my personal thoughts, and evidential information to share with you, for your response.

Links:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/12/09/pope-francis-partners-with-corporate-titans-to-make-capitalism-more-inclusive-and-fair-is-this-for-real-or-just-corporate-virtue-signaling/?sh=1ee896254c7b

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/13/george-pell-saw-climate-science-as-a-dangerous-religious-dogma-in-the-end-his-hardline-stance-held-the-church-back

https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-corporate-capture-of-global-governance-and-what-we-are-doing-about-it

https://hbr.org/2020/01/making-stakeholder-capitalism-a-reality

https://austrian-institute.org/en/blog/do-we-need-a-great-reset-or-more-capitalism/

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-time-for-a-massive-reset-of-capitalism/

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/human-development-falling-behind-un-report-countries-global

https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/church-bells-peal-climate-action

https://pacific.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/ringing-the-alarm-on-climate-change/

https://www.catholic.org.nz/news/media-releases/church-leaders-urge-bolder-action-on-climate-change/

 

 

 

...

AGENDA 2030- SDG 1 ‘COMMUNIST DEGROWTH ‘SUPREME WEALTH AND EXTREME POVERTY IS SIGNIFICANTLY HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME

UN Agenda 2030: 17 Global Development Goals 169 Targets over 230 Indicators. For starters ignore the warm fuzzy language. Starting from the very beginning, is a very good place to start to describe firstly UN Agenda 2030 SDG ‘End Poverty in ALL Forms Everywhere’.   Remember behind the masks of the fuzzies hides evil monsters.

NZ’s ugly monsters are the political cronies that hide themselves in the toilet bowl of Wellington. UN Agenda 2030 SDG1 – End Poverty in ALL Forms Everywhere’ equates to, really means  ‘Redistribute wealth and resources to make the super rich much more wealthier and the middle class poorer. The super rich have hugely increased their share of the worlds wealth.  The 2020 Wealth, Health  & Inequality Report stated the largest rise in billionaire wealth was recorded as never seen before. The wealthiest in the world making 6 times more than the bottom 90% of humanity. That’s collectively $2.7 Billion per day. Where extreme wealth gaps have totally undermined SDG1 (Ending Poverty in ALL forms everywhere). The DAVOS WEF crowd reveling in their concentration of increased wealth. (World Bank reports Agenda 2030  SDG 1 unlikely to be met)

It is reported that ‘Extreme Wealth’ and ‘Extreme Poverty’ is significantly increasing at the same time. All those basic living expenses have significantly increased in price as worldwide more people struggle. Many more New Zealanders are struggling as inflation increases so does food, gas, energy, rents, loans and mortgages. On top of this is the increased crime, Newshub reported 23rd May 2023 the crime stat’s for NZ’s major cities. Between 2017 and 2022. March 2017 Auckland City 87,971   per year – 2023 to approx..,  110,000 this year already. March 2017 Wellington City 9,800 per annum – 2023 =12,290 per year. Christchurch City  March 2017 =25,547 per year increased in  2023 to 35,941 per year. Businesses are  anxious and concerned many continuing to report they do not feel safe. As for the Labour’s  Govt’s Gun Buy Back Scheme, that’s shot them in the foot so to speak, another failure. The shootings, stabbings, ram-raids have all increased.  Law abiding citizens register their guns, crim’s, gangs do not. Another UN global directive- disarm law abiding citizens.

Law abiding citizens, Conservative and Christians, no matter what race, those that oppose the Socialist Left woke political narratives have been assassinated by the government paid off media as ‘White Supremacists’. “How dare you be a conspiracy theorist, an anti vaxer”, using this to shut voices down, to divide the nation, to silence voices- Silence is Consent’.

It appears those political cronies do not need our consent, they just mandate the population to under human guineapig trails. “Go to Mcdonalds and get a Free Happy Meal with your next jab”- The very unhealthy MacJabber Burger with a free coke full of sugar, giving the message “look after health, your immune system have a McJabber and Coke Happy Meal..Coca Cola’s profit for 12 months ending June 30th 2023 was $25.832 Billion a 6.15% increase over a year. Coca Cola facing a lawsuit for plastic pollution from the Earth Island Institute and Plastic Pollution Coalition. However Coca Cola reports the UN SDGs Agenda 2030 are championed as an important framework  for collective action

What are the SDG Plans of the UN/WEF Partnership Global Governance?  A global registry of policies, commitments, multistakeholder partnerships (Corporate Capture) with governments. UN/WEF support accelerate UN Agenda 2030. All governments are encouraged to register their policies to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030 (Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age

Corporate Capture globally, regionally, nationally increasing the price of goods and services, increasing payouts to shareholder. Lining the pockets of the ultra rich, forcing more millions into poverty. (What does SDG 1 look like now?) The FAO (UN) is in Rome, they monitor the worlds food supply report food security and poverty. FOA have reported that 95 food and energy corporations have doubled their profits made shareholder much wealthier. 1.7 Billion workers live in countries where inflation not outpaces wages. This has not just happened, it’s been happening for decades, the global system is totally rigged and corrupt favours the most wealthiest on the planet.

In New Zealand parliamentarians do not publicize that they are selling off assets that belong to All New Zealanders- these are called ‘Crown Enterprises’ will not publicize that the people of New Zealand own Crown Assets under Crown Enterprises, they belong to you namely a non-government party. The Government’s role is to ensure that NZ Assets are retained in ‘public ownership’. The Government has sold many of those assets that ALL the people of NZ own. They have robbed the people blind.

If you are being seriously effected by the much higher cost of living, or you need another car, or house maintenance etc., Or you maybe a business that needs more finance so you are able to survive, or a farmers who is seriously affected by the govts restrictions, so you may well apply to the bank for a loan. Your carbon footprint will be scrutinized by a somewhat similar system as the ‘Chinese Social Credit System’. Compliancy will get the loan, non-compliancy will not, you will be seen as a credit risk. The Global Elite with their mansions by the sea, leaders of governments, corporations travelling around the world multiple times in one year. Yes they try to cause anguish through main stream reporting and legislations to stop the rising seas, measure your carbon footprint. However the worlds 60 biggest banks have provided $4.6 trillion in financing for fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement in 2015. Yet they scrutinize ethical mortgages, ethical savings account, ethical bank accounts, ethical cash . The greedy rich banks that crippled the world economy. Yes the greedy banking morons with their climate and financial risk insanity. Mortgage lenders that cash in on peoples misery.

The role of Greed and Fear and the hiking of interest rates, do they care about you, families and communities ? HELL NO. Do they care about those in poverty? Hell NO. The International Bank of Settlements control all the worlds money. Does it care about the world’s children living in poverty ? Hell NO. Banks are like greedy ugly moths that eat through your savings, eat your standard of living and eat your future away. This is a global, regional, national recession in pursuit of benefiting the already wealthy. Winston Peters interview on You Tube.. the country is $40 billion more dollars in debt. A debt left to you, your children and your children   SDG 1 Agenda 2030. End ALL Poverty everywhere HELL NO.

Crises-Fear-Silenced and Controlled ‘Agenda 2030 Corporate Capture of ALL UN Nations States. Multi-stakeholder Capitalism. SDG 1 Agenda 2030 End Poverty in ALL its forms everywhere, equates to ‘ redistribute wealth and resources’ to make the super rich wealthier, the middle class much poorer. “You will be happy and own nothing”. 7th April 2022 the World Economic Forum  Website includes the chart from the World Inequality Lab’ of global income and wealth inequality. Showing the richest 10% of the worlds population own 76% of wealth globally whereas the poorest half own just a sliver. Then adds -STEP UP THE VACCINES.

Global Citizen reports “New study reveals Immunization could put an end to poverty” 13/2/2018 Harvard Institute. Playing as vital role will help 24 million people from falling into poverty by 2030 (Agenda 2030 (UN) Funded by Melinda & Bill Gates Foundation.(Red Flag). Gates fund the pandemic Preparedness 12/5/2022 commits US $125 million to end one pandemic and prevent the next it is reported by the Gates Foundation itself. Bill Gates net wealth $110 billion. Bill Gates best investment reports CNBC News turned his $10 billion into $200 billion (23/1/2019) A return on his vaccine investments.

The ‘Billionaire Boom’ Boom time increases wealth of America’s richest billionaires. Washington Post March 12th 2021 Six Tech Titans made more than US $360 billion from March 2020 to March 2021. Its reported 8th February 2022 “the richest people in the world got even richer and more people fell into the poverty trap. The wealth gap is killing the poor.

This is the obsessional SDG pushing, ramming it down our throats, destroying small businesses, that may never recuperate again, people struggling to pay for basic items necessary to exist. The worlds richest have doubled their fortunes since the pandemic began whilst the world income of 99% of humanity are much worse off as a result of the Pandemic. The Non-binding Agenda 2030 (UN) was adopted in September 2015. The majority of the population did not know and many are still unaware that this was and is still happening,  this massive transformational shift actioned by NZ’s MP’s in Parliament, therefore ‘Silence remains Consent’.

The people did not vote MPs into Parliament to destroy our economy, punish our people, mandate them out of jobs. Publicly crucify them through the mainstream media because they refuse to take part in a global experiment. UN Envision 2030 Eradicate extreme poverty for ALL people everywhere. Extreme poverty measured at living on less than $1.25 per day.

New Zealander should be outrages at what  destruction these parliamentarians have done to New Zealand. The people of NZ did not vote in prior referendums, or elections to be aggressively controlled by outside interference of corporate capitalism. I for one, an done.. enough is enough. Surely all others have had enough. The Governments initiative, their goal, their purpose is to destroy NZ’s free market economy, free market enterprise and replace it with UN/WEF Multistakeholder Corporatization ‘Corporate Capture. Free market economy is ‘your freedom to choose’. Stakeholder Corporate Capitalism ‘your freedom is seriously, severely at stake’. I will not believe that the people of NZ voted for our Sovereign Nation to be  harshly aggressively ruled by a one world governance. All these parliamentarians need to be gone, enough is enough. New Zealand has become a dangerous place for children, families for all ages. UN Agenda 2030- everyone, everywhere at every age- leave no-one behind.

Stats NZ will report that Poverty in NZ is unchanged (Stats NZ Govt Dept). Govt paid off Mainstream media will confirm this. As does Jan Tinetti’s Beehive speech 22/3/2022. STATS NZ are caught out ‘No inclusion of the most vulnerable families’ (Child In  The City .Org). The 9,000 households questioned in the survey, there were almost no inclusion of some of the most vulnerable families. The Govt’s Advisory Group February 2019 report made 42 recommendations on how the govt could change child poverty rates, not one of them have been implemented.  The Government uses Agenda 2030 Indicators to measure poverty. NZ Labour reports more than 60,000 kids lifted out of poverty.  Business and Economic Research Ltd 4/4/2023 Thousands of children in NZ still living in financial, material hardship (Ardern’s ‘Child Poverty Reduction Act). Again another miserable  FAILURE. Stats NZ estimate child poverty stats

Ministry of Social Development (Govt) report New Zealand Poverty Project’s method of establishing a poverty line using focus groups to establish a consensual-based poverty measure. Rubbish in and rubbish out. They are lying, we know they are lying, you know, that they know, that we know they are lying. SDG 1. UN AGENDA 2030 Communist De-Growth. With high inflation rates, increased cost of loans, mortgages, rents, basic necessities in life, you don’t have to be a researcher, an academic to know that this has significantly negatively affected people, families, children the elderly in NZ. SDG 1. Crises-Fear-Silenced and Controlled ‘Agenda 2030 Corporate Capture of ALL UN Nations States. Multi-stakeholder Capitalism. SDG 1 Agenda 2030 End Poverty in ALL its forms everywhere, equates to ‘ redistribute wealth and resources’ to make the super rich wealthier, the middle class much poorer. ‘You will be happy and own nothing’

AGENDA 2030- SDG 1 ‘COMMUNIST DEGROWTH ‘SUPREME WEALTH AND EXTREME POVERTY IS SIGNIFICANTLY HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME.

I urge people to vote in New Zealand’s General Election whom want morality back, families protected -I say NO to Critical Race Theory and NO to Gender Ideology Theory in the School Curriculum and in the Workplace. Stop this sexually abusing, sexualization of our children NOW. I believe in One Law for One Nation. That our farmers and small businesses must be protected return New Zealand’s economy into a Free market enterprise where there is freedom to choose. Say NO to Multi-stakeholder Corporate Capitalism (Where freedoms are serious threatened

Be Gone Agenda 2030. Be Gone the Undemocratic WTO, the WHO the UN/WEF Globalist Cabal. Do NOT Under-estimate New Zealanders, we have  plenty of farmers that can lend their hand to most things. They can feed our Nation. We have a wealth of Natural Resources, do not let anyone tell you “We need the UN”. We have the ‘Number 8 Wire’ mentality, so lets do it. Surely enough is enough, I certainly have had enough- What about you?  SDG 1 Agenda 2030 Data-Rubbish in and Rubbish Out. Throw it in the rubbish. Step Out Of The Poverty Trap.

Researched By Carol Sakey   WakeUpNZ

LINKS:

https://www.childinthecity.org/2023/03/23/bleak-future-for-children-living-in-poverty-in-new-zealand-report/?gdpr=accept   https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2022/05/gates-foundation-commits-up-to-125-million-covid19-prevent-pandemics

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/karl-stefanovic-unleashes-on-greedy-big-banks-after-rba-rate-rise/news-story/d1367091a8f4ed37c1609c6de5e63d53

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/02/08/1075509346/oxfam-blames-the-rich-for-the-pandemic-plight-of-the-poor-its-a-controversial-cl

https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/financial-crisis-explained-how-greedy-us-banks-crippled-world-economy-118090500388_1.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/12/musk-bezos-zuckerberg-gates-pandemic-profits/

https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/banks-climate-change-environmental-crisis#:~:text=Here%20we%20discuss%20how%20banks,Banking%20on%20Climate%20Chaos%20report.

https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/immunization-to-end-poverty/

https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships

 

 

...