IS INDIA NZ’S  NEW PARTNER IN CRIME? Digitalization presents significant risks that can lead to unintended criminalization of Law Abiding Citizens. This includes concern as to Invasive Surveillance * Automated Decision making * The expansion of Digital Data * Data driven offences.

INDIA IS INCREASINGLY RECOGNIZED UNs GLOBAL LEADER IN DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION.: Advocating Digital Public Infrastructure. The adoption of DPI Models. The United Payments Interface-Digital Identification.

UNDP ANNOUNCES:- WHEN INDIA MOVES FORWARD- THE WORLD MOVES WITH IT::. NZ Govt is actively deepening its engagement with Inia’s Rapid Digitalization (India emerges as a Global Technology Hub). Aristech *Digital Transformation

INDIA AND NZ GOVTS DIGITAL DISPORA ENGAGEMENT: India is recognized as holding  8% to 10% of NZs Digital Workforce (The India-NZ Govt Tech Collaboration). The NZ Centre for Digital Connections with India (CDC) Knowledge Hub (A Bridge to Indian Digital Growth) (NZ’s Digitalization Governance) Digital Transformation across the Public Sector and Beyond

WHAT DO THE CITIZENS OF NZ KNOW ABOUT MODI’S INDIAN GOVERNMENT? Obviously Luxon has put this is Bed (Silenced it) The 2025 Reports ‘India continues its Systematic Decline In Human Rights. (When Human Rights abusers are elected as members of the UN Human Rights Commission (We will now improve on our Human Rights- This is called the Big Tent Theory – It’s a LIE

UN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS ‘MEMBERS OF THE UNHRC’ ARE NOT SCRUTINIZED: By other UN Member States. Larger more powerful UN Member States- UN Avoids  Resolution going through the UNHRC (Use other UN Agencies)

INDIA’S SYSTEMATIC DECLINE IN HUMAN RIGHTS (2025 Reports) India’s Govt led by Modi intensifying crackdowns on Dissent *Media *Minorities * Increased harassment of Journalists. Violent conflicts in Manipur- reports of Torture * Counter-terrorism Laws target Activists * Researchers * NGOs . There are Internet Shut-downs * Violence against women * Rape & Murder. (India continues its systematic decline in Human Rights)

INDIA WAS ELECTED UNOPPOSED AS A MEMBER OF THE UNHRC: 2026 TO 2028 Term (Making Indias 7^th Term- highlighting its commitment to Global Human Rights. India pledging to advance Human Rights Principles globally & Domestically India’s dedication to Human Rights) However the UN Human Rights Council acts for some as a Big Tent Institution (Allowing countries to improve their Human Rights Records)

THE BIG TENT THEORY INCLUDES HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS (VIOLATORS). The Big Tent Theory is highly flawed.  Where membership to the UNHRC shield countries from critics (where members of the UNHRC have poor Human Rights Records) This includes India. Using their seat to deflect International Scrutiny & to Protect Allies from Censure rather than improving their own Domestic Human Rights

THE CLEAN SLATE NON COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS : The same amount of Candidates as Seats. Turns UNHRC Membership elections into an Appointment Process (By-passing any real scrutiny of a Candidates Human Rights Record. Despite India’s pledges as to its seat on the  UNHRC (India has been criticized for failing to implement recommendations from the Universal Periodic Review (UPR)..For blocking visits to UN Special Rapporteurs (With having received over 25 pending requests as late as 2025)

INDIA IS ACCUSED OF RETALIATING AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS:  (2025 UN Report) noted that 10 current Human Rights Council Members including India have  been accused od retaliating  against Human Rights Defenders whom cooperate with the UN

HERE’S ONE FOR MR. LUXON’S LOVE OF INDIA: The Big Tent Theory (Which is a Lie) Human Rights Abuses elected onto the UNHRC –(Committing to improve their Human Rights) *2026 to 2028 India (Unopposed) was elected onto the UNHRC due to a ‘Clean Slate Election’. (Where no other Candidates competed for the available Regional Seat on the Council)

INDIA HAS A DOMESTIC HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE RECORD: A deteriorating domestic situation- The Repression of Minorities  * The Silencing of Civil Society * India votes alongside Authoritarian Regimes (India’s Govt is shielded by Scrutiny by being a member of the UNHRC)

INDIA JOINED PAKISTAN * VIETNAM * CHINA: Voting Against the UN Human Rights Council Resolution that ‘Condemned Iran’s Crackdown on Protestors

UN WATCH REPORTED INDIA PRIORITIZES “ Strategic Autonomy and National Interests over that of Universal Human Rights  Values. Often opposing ‘Country Specific’ Resolutions that are deemed politically motivated (Namely Bulldozer Justice)

INDIA VOTED AGAINST UN RESOLUTION CONDEMMING IRANS CRACKDOWN ON PROTESTORS: January 2026 India joined China * Pakistan * Vietnam in voting against a UNHRC Resolution that ‘Condemned Iran’s Crackdown on Protestors’.

ALLEGATIONS BY THE US & CANADA (NOVEMBER 2024): India’s State Agents were involved in Criminal Activity on Foreign Soil targeting Separatist Leaders.

INDIA’S CONTINUING ARBITRARY DETENTIONS & RESTRICTIONS: On Basic Freedom-* Includes Long Term Imprisonment *Unjustified Judicial Hearings* Violence against Minorities * Ransacking of Churches * Attacks on Muslims and Particularly Christians * Targeting Christian Pastors. Reporting that Hate Speech Incidents have significantly increased in 2025)

INDIA’S RESPONSE AT THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY” Respond to these evidential accusations as “Criticism that are Hollow-Shallow- Ill Informed and Western Hypocrisy. But India’s Human Rights Records are frequently addressed by other UN Mechanisms rather than the UNHRC. (Avoiding Name Shaming-Scrutiny). Major UN Member Nation Power like India “ (Reported as ‘ Due to Sensitivities & the Principle of Non Interference’) are protected against Resolution held against them.

INDIA WAS CALLED TO HALT ARBITRARY DETENTIONS; In June 2025. In 2018-2019 UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called for a Commission of Inquiry into the severe Human Rights Abuses is Kashmir India (The Highest Level Investigation). However, due to the lack of majority support from UN Member States at the UN General Assembly the Human Rights Resolution was not passed.

MORE RECENTLY ‘INDIA OPPOSED THE RESOLUTION AT THE UNHRC: That condemned Iran at the handling of protests. The UN urged Tehran to ‘Stop Extra-judicial Killings & Enforced Disappearances * Arbitrary Arrests.

LUXON’S CORNERSTONE FOREIGN POLICY ‘INDIA;S NEW FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: Announced December 22^nd 2025. A close economic & strategic alignment. Luxon announcing India’s Importance. This has been labeled a Bad Deal. Gives away too much on Immigration. (High Levels of Migrations from India). But Luxon rejects these serious concerns.

DUNCAN GARNER HITS THE NAIL ON THE HEAD: Grand Slam Duncan. Luxon’s deal flew under the Radar. The agreement to Uncapped Student Visa’s – 20 hrs employment per week for Indian Students during study. NZ has given away control of its Immigration Policy. Refers to  high Youth Unemployment *Housing under pressure * Migration already at record highs and “The Risks are Real & Permanent because this is locked into a Treaty- Not A Policy

2025 ERICA STANFORD INTRODUCED THE MASS MIGRATION AMANGEMENT ACT: That permits the Courts- Immigration Services more time to process Migrant entries

INDIA’S ANTI CONVERSIONS & ANTI-COW SLAUGHTER LAWS: Are used to Target Religious Minorities. 32/12/2025

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS UNDER MODI REGIME: Modie faces Democratic backsliding- Minority persecution – Human Rights Abuses and Global Allegations of State sponsored Repression. For the 9^th consecutive year Sweden’s V-Dem Institute has labelled India as an ‘Electoral Autocracy (Democracy Report 2025) warns of ‘shrinking free expression * growing Repression of Civil Society * Deepening Polarization *Systematic crackdown on Dissent * Erosion of Civil Liberties *Persecution of Religious & Ethnic Minorities

MODI’S RULING BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY (BJP) Increasing relying on Draconian Laws- used to criminalize protests and stifle criticism. Discrimination against Religious & Ethnic Minorities have become institutionalized. Authorities ignore attacks, fail to prosecute perpetrators. In some Regions demands for Constitutional Protection are crushed  through Curfews * Internet Blackouts ^* Legal Intimidation * Brute force.

THE GLOBAL TORTURE INDEX 2025 RANKED INDIA AS A ‘HIGH RISK COUNTRY’ Refers to disturbing patterns of ‘Beatings’ 8 Forced confessions * Custodial Deaths. A Report titled ‘Status of Policing In India Report 2025 Refers to Police Torture and Unaccountability. According to the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) More than 500 Churches and 2 Synagogues have been destroyed during clashes in the Manipur State

MODI GOVT RESPONSE TO MANIPUR IS HEAVY HANDED: Is not merely a conflict zone  but an example of how minority rights are trampled on under the weight of Modi’s National Agenda

INDIAN DIPLOMATS EXPELLED FROM CANADA: Canada’s National Police Dept concluded that the Indian Ambassador had links to Murders * Threats of Death & Intimidation in Canada (October 2024) Canada expelled 6 Indian Diplomats including the High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma for the involvement in the murder of a Sikh National in Canada. (Recommending Sanctions against India’s external spy agency in its involvement in plots to assassinate Sikh Activists. India exposed at the International Level as a State sponsored Terrorism

2^ND DECEMBER 2025- INDIA’S REPREHENSIBLE ACTIONS: Were reported as a serious threat to International and Regional Peace & Security (

LUXON PUT THAT IN YOUR PIPE AND SMOKE IT. India & NZ Government Digitalization. Luxon makes Trade Deal with Modi’s India (Reported to be a Serious Threat to International & Regional Peace & Security. 13 Aug 2024.

THE COMMITTEE HIGHLIGHTED INDIA’S USE OF COUNTER-TERRORISM LEGISLATION: As  leading to grave Human Rights Violations (Source of Information-The International Federation of Human Rights 13/8/2024)

CRITICS  ‘ HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS’ MAINTAIN THAT WITHOUT AN ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM: Or strict Membership Criteria to the UN Human Rights Council.

DEMOCRATIC STATES ALSO MAKE SELECTIVE JUDGEMENTS. Holding dome countries to high standards of Human Rights whilst Ignoring Human Rights Abusing  Regimes (Countries). As strategic partners rather than  that of advancing  International Human Rights

UN HUMAN RIGHT COUNCIL ‘A TOOTHLESS DEBATING SOCIETY’:’. Where Human Rights Violators engage in ‘Mutual Protection’ and International Scrutiny of their Human Rights Violation Records. Where  Secret electioneering onto the UNHRC employs  Vote Trading’- Back Room Deals (I’ll scratch your back- if you scratch mine. (This is Human Rights at the Highest Level in the World)

THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONEERING OF MEMBERSHIP TO THE UNHRC: The electioneering of Authoritarian Regimes onto the UNHRC – Through Secret Balloting.  Vote Trading. Dictatorship Regimes (Authoritarian Regimes) being elected. The Secret Ballot Process that bypasses Accountability. Back-room Deals * Vote Trading. Unqualified Human Rights Abusers elected as members of the UN Human Rights Council

ISLAMIC STATE S CAN DOMINATE THE UN HRC:  Islamic Human Rights is a false path. Religious implementation of the UN Human Rights Charter on its 70^th Birthday (12/102018) The UN is Part Of The Problem (Writes Noble Peace Prize Shirin Ebadi) Refers to the Human Rights Commissioner of the Iranian Govt. As he proudly defends the execution of ‘Divine Punishments’ including the ‘amputation of hands of thieves and deaths by stoning. Some Iranians facing imprisonment because they converted from Islam to Christianity. Iranian women punished if they try to assert their rights by discarding their hijab (IRAN sits on the UNHRC)

UN MEMBER STATES HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT & MORAL OBLIGATION: To Promote & Protect Human Rights (Individual Rights) At International and Domestic Levels. NZ Govt itself – State Policing Violence-Human Rights Abuses of those that chose not to be jabbed (COVID 19) Discrimination * Intimidation* Character Assassination * Physical and Mental Assault of Law Abiding Citizens

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

(https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-islamic-human-rights-is-a-false-path/a-46669053)

(https://www.thefridaytimes.com/02-Dec-2025/human-rights-violations-modi-regime)

(https://www.thefridaytimes.com/02-Dec-2025/human-rights-violations-modi-regime)

(https://www.fidh.org/en/region/asia/india/india-un-human-rights-committee-calls-for-protection-of-human-rights)

THE RISKS POSED ARE AS FOLLOWS:-  

(1) Negative Health effects from new Allergens or Toxins  (1a) Environmental risks like the creation of “superweeds” and resistant pests,   (1b)Reduced biodiversity, and ethical concerns about interfering with nature. (1c) Concerns as to the potential risk as to antibiotic resistance from genetically modified organisms   (1d)(GMOs) and the long-term, unknown consequences of genetic modification on ecosystems and human health.

(2)Health & Safety Concerns:-

(2a)Allergic reactions: Genetic engineering could introduce new allergens into the food supply. 

(2b)Antibiotic resistance: Genes for antibiotic resistance from GM crops could potentially transfer to humans or animals, contributing to antibiotic resistance.

(2c)Unknown long-term effects: The long-term health impacts of consuming GM foods are not fully understood.

(2d)New toxins: Some genetically engineered crops could produce new toxins. 

(3)Environmental Risks: –

(3a)”Superweeds” and “Superbugs”: Herbicide-resistant crops can lead to the development of herbicide-resistant weeds, and crops engineered to produce insecticides can lead to the evolution of pesticide-resistant insects.

(3b)Gene transfer: Genes from GM crops can spread to wild or weedy relatives through cross-pollination, creating new and potentially invasive plants.

(3c)Harm to non-target organisms: Pollen from some GM crops can be toxic to beneficial insects like the monarch butterfly.

(3d)Biodiversity loss: The promotion of monoculture and the spread of GM crops can lead to a reduction in crop biodiversity and impact the resilience of ecosystems.

(3e)Increased chemical use: Despite promises to reduce pesticide use, some GM crop systems can increase the use of chemical herbicides, leading to soil and water degradation.

(4)Ethical and socioeconomic concerns:-

(4a)Interference with nature: Some people have ethical objections to altering the genetic makeup of organisms.

(4b)Dependence on large companies: Genetic engineering can increase the dependence of developing countries on large seed companies, potentially giving them control over food production.

(4c)Loss of genetic diversity: The push for genetically uniform crops can lead to a loss of valuable traditional varieties.

(4d)Unpredictable interactions: Genetically engineered plants could have unforeseen interactions with the environment, potentially becoming invasive and displacing native species.

(5)Socio-Economic Risks (Issues) and Ethical Issues:-

(5a)Corporate control: The agricultural GE industry is highly concentrated, with a few large multinational corporations dominating the market for patented seeds. This dependence on patented seeds can limit farmers’ autonomy, reduce competition, and increase costs, raising concerns about food sovereignty.

(5b)Social inequality: The high cost of GE technology can exacerbate the gap between wealthy farmers and larger countries that can afford the technology and small-scale farmers and developing nations who cannot. Critics argue this further entrenches social inequality in the global food system.

(5c)Ethical concerns: Manipulating the genetic material of living organisms raises ethical questions for many people, especially those with certain religious or cultural beliefs. Public mistrust is a significant hurdle, fueled by misinformation and past controversies over the safety of GE products.

(5d)Genetic engineering (GE) in agriculture poses a range of socioeconomic risks for farmers, particularly affecting their market access, profitability, and independence (There are significant challenges)

6)Corporate Control and Farmer Independence:-

6a)Seed monopoly: A handful of large, multinational corporations dominate the market for genetically engineered seeds, creating a monopoly. For example, just four companies control about 60% of the global seed market, leading to increased seed costs.

6b)Patent restrictions: Farmers who purchase patented GE seeds are often legally restricted from saving seeds from their harvest for replanting the next season. This forces them to buy new seeds annually, locking them into a cycle of dependency on biotech companies.

6c)Liability and inspection: Seed contracts can grant companies the right to inspect farmers’ fields. In some cases, farmers have been sued for patent infringement when patented GE crops have appeared in their fields from unintentional gene flow, even though it was not their fault.

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

A New Zealand Delegation Representing the Government have recently voted at the UN in favor of the Inclusion Of Gender Identity Ideology. Participating in filling the Gender Gaps (UN  Global Agenda 2030) Transforming Our World. Leave No-one Behind ( UN Documented words not mine)

We did not vote for Global Agenda 2030 and it will  be definitely absent from the Election Ballot Box. (Researching as to just how transparent our Government is (eem Non transparent) Sharing the following that I have recently researched through the UNDP as follows:-

SDG 5 Gender Equality (Un Agenda 2030) Transforming Our World. The Core Principle (Proviso) Is ‘To Leave No-one Behind’. UN Agencies include Transgender- Gender Diverse individuals. Whereby they describe ‘Gender Equality cannot be achieved without addressing the rights of people with Diverse Genders (SOCIESC) Sexual Orientation * Gender Identity & Expression * Sex Characteristics

The Key actions at the UN March 2026 ‘ Defending all Women in ALL their Diversity. The NZ Delegation supported the UN Theme “Rights-Justice-Action for ALL Women and Girls this is a phrase used by UN Bodies to explicitly encompass Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals

It is well documented by the UN that there is the crucial need to ‘fill The Gender Gaps’ for Transgender- Diverse Individual Identities. UN Women and partnership organizations are increasingly integrating queer perspectives into the SDG (Global Development Goals of Global Agenda 2030 (UN) Transforming  Our World 2030 (Source UNDP)

Its reported that the current SDGs (Agenda 2030) namely SDG5 that the framework is too restricted, leaves vulnerabilities referencing Transgender and Gender Diverse people.

Therefore the UN calls UN Member Nation States to address the intersecting forms of discrimination, putting Gender Diverse- Transgender people under the category of those that are left ‘furthest behind’. This fits like glove with Agenda 2030 Core Principle to ‘Leave No-one Behind’.

This does not seem to be openly  politically contested in New Zealand (The Gender Gap), it mis masked by ‘Women and Girls Inequality)  However UN Women and Partner organizations re increasingly integrating Trans and Gender Diverse people into the Global Agenda 2030 SDG-Global Development Goals framework (SDG 5)  Documenting them as the Furthest Left Behind.

Data is reported as being limited for several SDG Goals , Indicators particularly concerning the ‘Diversity of Gender Identities’, making it difficult to measure progress for the Gender Diverse Community (Groups).

.Inclusive Mandates have been implemented where organization such as UNICEF have updated their Internal Gender Policies (2021-2030) to adopt ‘Gender Transformative Approaches’ that aim to dismantle Systemic barriers for ALL Children and Adolescents regardless of whatever Gender Identity there is

Gender Diverse- Transgender peoples are linked to multiple UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals (SDGs) beyond that of SDG 5 this also includes SDG3 (Good Health & Wellbeing) * SDG 4 (Quality Education) * SDG8 (Decent Work) * SDG10 (Reduced Inequalities). Global Agenda 2030 includes  everything that touches your life.

So where does the NZ Government stand on Gender Identity Ideology? Let me take you to a very important event that happened last month (March 2026). The 70th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW70) at the UN.  A NZ Delegation representing NZ Government participated.

The focus being on  the Inclusive Language of Gender Identity Ideology. NZ Representative formed part of the Vote in Favour vs the Vote  the Inclusion of  Gender Identity Ideology

NZ formed part of the majority that adopted the final outcome document that retained the terms such as Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation (SOGI). The US actively objected to this and sought to remove it through failed amendment that US Representative proposed.

The NZ Delegation representing NZ Government objected to the US Proposal to define Gender strictly as Biological Male and Female at the March 2026 70th Session of the Commission on the Status of women (CSW70) which was held at the UN.

The US Delegation was the only one that voted against the final conclusion of the CSW70 gathering in March 2026.                                                 The  NZ Delegation voted alongside 37 representatives of UN Nation States in favor of  Gender Identity Inclusion (Ideology). The NZ Delegation  was organized by the Ministry of women (NZ) that represented the govt and selected NGO delegates.

The  NZ Official delegation  that represented the NZ Government included senior government officials such as Kellie Coombes (Secretary for Women) and Carolyn Schwalger who is a permanent  NZ Representative at the UN.  And also NGO Delegate Tufuga Rhia Taonui was also a selected NGO , a member of the delegation that represented the govt

Obviously  NZ Government are still reaffirming their Gender Identity Ideology  to fill the UN Agenda 2030 Gender Gap. The  NZ Government recently reaffirmed its commitment to UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals. Transforming Our World By 2030 through an official National Statement delivered 13th March 2026 (Transparency Zilch)

Along with 26 EU Members and other Allies NZ Delegates that represented NZ Government rejected the US led proposal to define Gender strictly as Biological Male and Female

WakeUpNZ.

RESEARCHER: Cassie

Over the many years I have been researching I have never heard any talking about Maurice Strong. He was very influential in the early formulations of UN Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and the 2020 Davos Great Reset. Goof friend of the Rockefeller family. Mentor and lifelong friend to Klaus Scwab. On the Founding Board of the WEF. Advisor to two Secretary Generals of the UN. Advisor to the President of the World Bank. Has been awarded many distinctions and Awards

Maurice Strong a billionaire oilman. One of the key propagators of the theory that ‘man made CO2 emissions from transportation, vehicles, coal plants and agriculture caused a dramatic & accelerating global temperature rise that threatens the Planet- the so called Global Warming (Climate Con)

As chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference, Strong promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to “save the environment.” Strong stated his radical ecologist agenda:- “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Strong was a curious choice to head a major UN initiative to mobilize action on the environment, as his career and his considerable fortune had been built on exploitation of oil, like an unusual number of the new advocates of ‘ecological purity,’ such as David Rockefeller or Robert O. Anderson of Aspen Institute or Shell’s John Loudon.

Strong had met David Rockefeller in 1947 as a young Canadian eighteen and from that point, his career became tied to the network of the Rockefeller family. Through his new friendship with David Rockefeller, Strong, at age 18, was given a key UN position under UN Treasurer, Noah Monod. The UN’s funds were conveniently enough handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank. This was typical of the model of “public-private partnership” to be deployed by Strong—private gain from public government.

In the 1960s Strong had become president of the huge Montreal energy conglomerate and oil company known as Power Corporation, then owned by the influential Paul Desmarais. Power Corporation was reportedly also used as a political slush fund to finance campaigns of select Canadian politicians such as Pierre Trudeau, father of Davos protégé Justin Trudeau, according to Canadian investigative researcher, Elaine Dewar. [ix]

Strong organized was a key player in the UN Earth Summit 1. And the UN Rio Summit, by b1971 Maurice Strong was named the Under-Secretary of the UN in New York and Secretary General of the upcoming Earth Day Conference (UN Conference on the Human Environment- Earth Summit) in Stockholm Sweden

Strong was also the Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation which financed the launching of the UN Stockholm Earth Day project. It was the Stockholm Earth Day Project that created the UN Environment Program (UNEP). Maurice Strong was the Head of this UNEP

1989 Maurice Strong was named by the UN Secretary General to head the 1992 UN Conference on Environment & Develop,emt or UNCED (Rio Earth Summit 11) Strong oversaw the drafting of the UN Sustainable Environmental Goals- UN Agenda 21 for Global Sustainable Development. Which is the basis of Klaus Schwabs ‘Great Reset’. And also the blueprint of UN AGENDA 2030 ‘Transforming Our World’ Core Principle being ‘Leave No-one Behind’

Sustainable Development forms the basis of the WEF Klaus Schwabs Great Reset, as well as the creation of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC (UN). Strong also arranged for Klaus Schwab to serve as a key advisor to the Rio Earth Summit

Maurice Strong also commissioned a report for the Club Of Rome. The First Global Revolution which was authored by Alexander King which actually admitted that the CO2 Global Warming claim was merely an invested ruse to force change “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

Tim Wirth was President Clintons delegate to the UN Rio Summit – he stated  “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Strong at the Rio Summit first introduced the manipulative idea  of “Sustainable Society’ and defined it in his goal in eliminating CO2 and other so called Greenhouse Gases. Agenda 21 then became Agenda 2030 in September 2015 in Rome, with the Popes blessing of the 17 sustainable global Development goals- Transforming Our World- Leaving No-one Behind’

Also declaring that “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlement, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market …Private land ownership also is a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice… Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only ‘be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”

In short private land ownership must become socialized for “society as a whole,” an idea well-known in Soviet Union days, and a key part of the Davos Great Reset. At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General Secretary, Strong declared:-                 “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable.”

Maurice Strong was at the very centre of the UNs Transformation Of Our World, the imposing of a Technocratic paradigm of stealth, using dire warnings of planet extinction and global warming which led to global boiling- Climate Crisis- Climate Emergency. With merging government agencies- corporate power in unelected control of pretty much everything

Agenda 2030(UN) Transforming Our Lives ‘Leave No-one Behind’ by passing the General Election Ballot Box. Maurice Strongs 1997 creation of the action plan following the UN Earth Summit ‘ The Global Diversity Assessment’ a blueprint for the roll out of the WEF Fourth Industrial Revolution. An inventory of every resource on the planet- how it will be controlled and how they would achieve this global revolution (Maurice Strong at this time was co chairman of the WEF Forum)

Maurice Strong died in October 2015. Klaus Schwab wrote about his good friend and Mentor: –.“He was my mentor since the creation of the Forum: a great friend; an indispensable advisor; and, for many years, a member of our Foundation Board”

Strong left the UN due to the Oil For Food Scandal, although escaped any official accusations of wrong doing. He was a Member of the Club Of Rome Think Tank. Trustee of the Rockefeller and Rothchild Foundation. Also the Director of the ‘Temple Of Understanding of the ‘Lucifer Trust (aka Lucis Trust) housed at the Cathedral of St John the Divine in New York City “where pagan rituals include escorting sheep and cattle to the alter for blessing. Here, Vice President Al Gore delivered a sermon, as worshippers marched to the altar with bowls of compost and worms…”

Eeem yep the Luciferian Agenda among the Globalist elites. The dark Side of Schwabs Great Reset- You will own nothing and you will be happy…Yep this generation they really have very little hope of owning their own home.. The Global Agenda is very dark, dystopian and bloody evil.. and intends to elimination us of trillions of dollars…capture us in a digital imprisonment (confinement- control).

Filling the Gaps to accelerate Global Agenda 2030- Indigenous Iwi/Maori Radicals Peoples Report to the UN.. And Migration is embedded in 10 out of the 17 Global Goals of UN Agenda 2030. Through a Joint Official Agreement signed 13/6/2019 the WEF and UN agreed to advance the Global Development Goals across the World jointly (Corporate Captured)

EEM.. And The NZ Three Party Govt and right across all Political Parties have reaffirmed their commitment to embrace- support- promote and advance this Globalist Evil Agenda ‘ Transforming Our Lives’ Everyone Everywhere At Every Age. (Their Words Not Mine) BY PASSING THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT VOTING BOX.

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie