THE ‘ACT PARTY AND NZ FIRST AGREEMENT IN THE THREE PARTY COALITION THAT NO HATE SPEECH LAWS WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN NZ’

WHAT IS CHSA = Countering Hate Speech Aotearoa. (Scoop NZ 22/3/2023). Soop News Media NZ reported in March this year that SHSA plans to undertake work on Hate Speech Laws, this work is being performed by the NZ Law Commission. Paul Goldsmith National Party’s response to this was “he announced that he had directed the NZ Law Commission NOT to  advance with  the report on the adoption of Hate Speech laws in NZ.

The CHSA was formed with  the goal of promoting Hate Speech Law’ Legislation referring back to the Christchurch Lone Wolf Terrorist attack of March 15^th 2019. However CHSA focus much of their work particularly around LGBTQ1++ community, the rights of Transgender, inter-sex, gender diverse, non-binary.

The Chief Executive Paul Thistoll stated the Hate Speech Report will cost $200,000. CHSA is a non-profit Organization and CHSA was in talks with institutional donors to help fund the cost of the Report. Further research has found that mostly small donations have been obtained by CHSA. Sean Hendy donating $5.00. Sean Hendy – Auckland University, authored the book Silencing Science in 2016, an interesting read where scientist were being silenced on certain information that was never reported, published for the public of NZ to see.

Paul Thistoll is the main leader of CHSA describing the organization as an ‘open collective’ (Socialist). ACT Party and NZ First have concluded that there will be no implementation of Hate Speech Laws in NZ under their watch. Paul Thistoll CHSA described himself as an ‘entrepreneur  He had already written to the Minister Of Police and the Police Commissioner stating that police current posture on Hate Related Incidents are correct and lawful and should be continued”

Johnathan Ayling of the Free Speech Union in an interview spoke referred to Hate Hubs existing under the new 3 Party Coalition governance. 29^th March 2024 (The Press-Stuff NZ) Carmel Sepuloni  referred to Hate Speech as she referred to Paul Spoonley Co Director of He Whenua Taurikara, the National Centre for Countering Violent Extremism up until December 2023.  He was part of an independent panel advising the Police Commissioner and members of Te Raranga on a Police led project  on Hate Crime in NZ

The  NZ Law Commission was established in 1985 under the NZ Law Commission Act its principle function are ‘to keep the law of NZ under review in a systematic way- to make recommendations for reform and development of the Law in NZ. The NZ Law Commission is described as an Independent Crown Entity as defined in the Crown Entities Act 2004. The Minister responsible for the NZ Law Commission is Paul Goldsmith. The NZ Law Commission acts as an advisor to Ministers. (If Paul Goldsmith is responsible for the NZ Law Commission how is it that the Law Commission is still going ahead ? RED FLAGS.

THE NZ Law Commission consists of Judges Senior Practicing or Academic Lawyers (From the University Law Faculties). Are appointed for a fixed 3 or 5 year term. Researching further on the NZ Police Website have found  a heading titled “HATE MOTIVATED CRIMES”. Police  record all reports of ‘Hate Motivated Crimes’ incidences based on a persons perception.

A PERSONS PERCEPTION is the different mental processes that individuals use to form impressions of other people, the different conclusions they make based on their own impressions. The categorizing of a persons behavior, thus making predictions what people are like, and what they are likely to do, this allows people to make snap judgement and decisions that can lead to biased or stereotyped perceptions of others. (A process to perform an opinion) If people have a mental health condition, dementia this then can charge the way they perceive things to be, how one person perceived something may not be the way another person perceives it through variables, and subjective thoughts. (This is not evidential information its predictive)

The Police website makes direct reference to ‘A Persons Perception’ if they feel hurt, unsafe because of race religion, sexuality, gender, age, disability they should tell some-one. (NOTE : FEEL not experience- Not Evidential) Report it to the Police or one of the Police Partner Agencies -It is important to report it to the police because (1) This information may be looked at when sentencing some-one in Court (What some-one thinks can be held against you in a court of law upon sentencing)

(2)Police Website adds:- Individual Reports add up  and can show a bigger problem (Big Brother State Thought Police have you on record because some-one perceives that are hurt because you said something to them)  (3) Everyone has the right to make a report to the police as to what they perceive as hate speech, this includes family members witnesses colleagues of anyone else.  (4) Police will record this as Perceived Hate Speech whether there is evidence or not).  The person reporting the ‘Perceived Hate Speech’ to the police as given a Police Reference Report Number.

IF THE REPORT IS INVESTIGATE: (5)If the report is investigated, there is evidence of a crime COULD have happened (COULD is NOT DID HAPPEN) through Hate, Bias, Prejudice. Police records all information on the Report for the Judge to consider when sentencing people in court (COULD IS A POSSIBLE  OR IMAGINED SITUATION)  (6) The Person making the report to the police can add further information to that report using the Police Reference Number.

IF THE REPORT IS NOT INVESTIGATED: This may be because what happened was not illegal but its still OK to report this to the police, because its important for future investigations by the police. (You have NOT committed a Crime yet your details and the event as perceived as a Hate Perceived Crime is still recorded by the Police.) Police record ALL Perceived Hate Motivate Reports whether evidence of a crime has been committed or not.

This information I have researched has been documented on the NZ Police Website under the heading of ‘Hate Motivated Crime’ But ACT Party and NZ First made a collation agreement with National Party that there would be NO Hate Crime Laws implemented in New Zealand under their watch.  NOTE: There is NO Legal definition of ‘HATE CRIMEOFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982. HATE MOTIVATED CRIMES A PROACTIVE RELEASES (PUBLISHED APRIL 2024)  NZ Police Website. In keeping with the Open Government Partnership National Plan Of Action 2016-2018 Police have released information requests where it is considered they contain data and information that has wider public interest. (HATE MOTIVATE CRIME POLICE WEB PAGE). OIA Responses 2024

Refers to four OIA Request dating from 22^nd February 2024 to March 1^st 2024 siting 4 PDF’s  *Information requested were reports of hate crimes against Police officers nationwide since 2019, a breakdown of the offence and number per region.    *Number of reported hate-motivated crimes, broken down month by month and by region from 2022-2024 against the following protected characteristic:- Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation.

*A breakdown of Hate motivate crimes between January 2023- February 2024 by type of offence reported. * From information published by RNZ, provide a breakdown of any charges laid. The outcomes of the cases where a charge was laid.

NZ Police definition of Hate Crime is ‘any offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated, wholly or in part  by a hostility or prejudice based on a persons particular characteristic eg Race, Religions, Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Age, Disability. The Particular characteristics referred to in this definition are commonly referred to as ‘Protected Characteristics’.  In the absence of specific legislative definitions, Police themselves (Govt Agency) have developed ‘working definitions’ in relation to Hate Crime, Hate Incidents and Hate Speech. These adopted Police definitions are from a broad landscape of definitions and terminologies across agencies and communities within Aotearoa NZ and Internationally, for specific police operational purposes.

Police definition of Hate Crime is Perception based’. Police are required to record reported in sub categories such as ‘Protected Characteristic’ ‘Perceived Prejudice’ and ‘Perceived Hate’. 1984 ORWELLIANISM REVISITED.  State Police policing the Sovereign State. The citizens of NZ are the Sovereign State. One Police OIA is signed by Mere Wilson Tuala-Fata Director of Prevention Innovation & Change . Iwi and Communities

HATE MOTIVATE CRIMES REPORTED TO POLICE THAT HAVE BEEN RECORDED. From January 2022 to February 2024  434 Reported ‘Perceived Hate Motivate Crimes.

RNZ Reported 17^th April 2024 Hate Crimes motivated by Gender Identity doubled between 2022 and 2023. The data was released to RNZ under an OIA request A 42% Spike since the Posie Parker Visit. Police reported that the 95% higher than the two previous years since the Posie Parker Event. NOTE: Police Website..Perceived.. Could..Feel.. A persons perception. Evidence or not is reported and recorded by Police. Transgender Mob Rule was clearly evident at the Posy Parker event at Albert Park Auckland as police watched trans community at the event harass, assault, abuse targeting anyone that was not of the trans community.

After being assaulted by members of the Trans Community at Posy Parker Event as Police watched on and did nothing. I complained to the two police officers that I had been assaulted, although they had clearly seen what had happened, I then described this to them. Their response “Well, the Trans Community are passionate in what they believe in”. I added “Yep and so are Murderers and Rapists’. This is NZ’s Police State. Political policing of Law Abiding NZrs.

THE PRESS Reported 29^th March 2024 article written by Paul Spoonley Co Director of He Whenua Taurikura, National Centre for Countering Violent Extremism. Part of the Independent Panel that advises the Police Commissioner on the police- led project to ‘Better Record Hate Crime and Speech. David Bromwell suggest we call it ‘Harmful Communication’. But Paul Goldsmith said that Hate Speech Laws would not be pursued. BUT Police Website clearly shows ‘Perceived Motivate Hate Speech that is reported, whether evidential or not is recorded in detail by the police and kept on their files. But Paul Goldsmith says quite different that Hate Crime Laws do not exist. RED FLAGS. On the NZ Police Govt Website they clearly do.

https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350227455/rise-and-rise-intolerance-online-world

https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/ir-01-24-6869.pdf

https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/ir-01-24-7404.pdf

https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/ir-01-24-6367.pdf

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/514532/reports-of-hate-crimes-against-trans-people-jump-42-percent-spike-month-of-posie-parker-visit

https://www.police.govt.nz/about-us/publication/hate-motivated-crimes-official-information-proactive-public-releases-april-2024

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/P2403/500197/chsa-to-undertake-work-on-hate-speech-laws.htm

https://www.police.govt.nz/advice-services/advice-victims/hate-motivated-crime?

RESEARCHER: Cassie (Carol Sakey)

UN Press reported 9^th August 2023 that ISIL known as Daesh and its affiliates are exploiting conflict and non-conflicted frailties worldwide. Exploiting, fueling extremism. This message went out all ALL UN Nation States Governments. This being the 17^th report referring to Daesh exploiting conflict dynamics and governance frailty, also refers to frailty during the times of the COVID19 pandemic restrictions. (UN Ref: S/2022/576),

The ISIL strategy as people as populations are mandated, severely restricted, denied basic human rights the ISIL strategy using overlapping global challenges of crisis catalyzing and spreading of terrorism, the violent extremism of Daesh as Authoritarian governments target conservatism, Christianity character assassinating them as Right Wing Extremists, White Supremacists even with brown skinned faces ISIL busy using this as their global terrorist campaign.

The UN Post documented the UN Document being Daesh S/2022/576 The exploring of conflict dynamics, governance fragilities, rating a plan and organizing terrorist attacks, controlling the flow of funds to enable Daesh short and long term ambitions.

Referencing Daesh financial action taskforce to finance terrorism, violent extremism and the emergence of the global pandemic, using this to their advantage. Exploiting trade, human trafficking, natural resources as to terrorism financing the Un called for a ‘ALL of UN Approach’ as to the threat of Jihad growing day by day. (UN Security Council)

Daesh ISIS, Al Qaida and Taliban connections REFERRING TO Congo and Mozambique being ‘Human Slaughter Houses’,  mobilizing finance to Daesh only 5 geopolitical regions on the African continent unaffected. ISIS connection throughout Africa as they illicit gold mining. Investigating journalists reporting that 6 billion Rand financing Daesh and their associates often unaccountable for their evil crimes.

UN 12^th August 2023 threat of Daesh ISIL UN Resolution 2253 UN Security Council Daesh and their militia strategy a strategic threat updated from the previous 4 months Resolution 2610 Security Council to provide 6 monthly reports on the gravity of the threat of Daesh in International space and security efforts for UN Member States in countering the threat

The 17^th UN Security Council Report was proposed by the Analytical Support & Sanctions Monitoring Team which was originally established this reporting  by the UN Security Council in  2004 which was Resolution 1526 as to Global Terrorism Coordination Compact Entities.

Documenting that the first half of 2023 threat posed to International Peace and Security by Daesh and associates remained high in conflict and non conflict areas as being a long standing threat- AS NZ’S AUTHORITARIAN STATE TARGET CHRISTIANS AND CONSERVATIVES THEY MUST HAVE BEEN INFORMED OF THIS REPORT AS ALL UN NATION GOVERNMENTS WERE.

I FIND IT RATHER DISTURBING THAT THE NZ SIS RECEIVED OVER 7,600 REPORTS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES ON TERRORISM PRIOR TO  THE 15^TH MARCH 2019 CHRISTCHURCH ATTACKS AND NOT ONE REFERRED TO RIGHT WING  EXTREMISM , WHITE SUPREMACY.

THE ROYAL INQUIRY INTO THE CHRISTCHURCH ATTACKS. DOCUMENT 15 Community Questions to the Royal Commission of Inquiry. Reports that the Muslim Community in Christchurch up to 5 years prior to the day of 15^th March 2019 they were fearful of Daesh Attacks during Ramadan.

Daesh Attacks, ISIS were full on in Turkey when Tarrant visited their on several occasions and even prolonged his visit there, yet Tourists agencies were warning westerners about the real dangers there for them. Did not stop Tarrant though. Tarrant also visited Pakistan,  Iceland, Poland and Ukraine  and even North Korea.

Turkey was known as the multi billion tourist industry target for ISIL, Daesh. Tourist agencies warning of kidnapping, blood soaked mayhem, suicide bombings, car hijacking (Reported by Wilson Centre) And the kidnapping of westernized citizens. But obviously Tarrant was OK, undisturbed with that and visited their multiple times. This must be a red flag

We should be concerned that NZ SIS/Police had a tabletop exercise in October 2018 as to a lone world attack on the very same mosque as Tarrant attacked.

REFERENCE IS MADE TO:- The Lowry Institute Report refers to the Khayat Brothers that were on trial in Australia for an alleged attempt to bomb an aircraft on behalf of ISIS, had a brother fighting for ISIS and two nephews killed fighting for ISIS in Syria but there was nothing in their activities, nor history that placed them on the watchlist

THIS IS DEFINITELY FOOD FOR THOUGHT. PLEASE MR CHIPPY CHIPKINS AND ALL YOU OTHER POLITICAL CRONIES IN THE CESSPIT OF WELLINGTON WE ARE OVER YOU TYRANNY YOUR CRISIS -CRISIS-  CRISIS. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. YOU HAVE DONE YOUR UTMOST TO DIVIDE OUR NATION THROUGH FEAR AND ONE CRISIS AFTER ANOTHER.

I have no need to even try to view Tarrant’s manifesto, not interested the red flags are enough for me and the UN Global Report to UN Nations States as to the high threat to UN Nations of Daesh, ISIL and their associates.

LINKS:

https://reliefweb.int/report/world/seventeenth-report-secretary-general-threat-posed-isil-daesh-international-peace-and-security-and-range-united-nations-efforts-support-member-states-countering-threat-s2023568-enar

https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14995.doc.htm )

https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/five-questions-about-christchurch-attack )  (Washington Post 16^th March 2019)

July 2021 there was a review of the senior school curriculum. Seven University professors known as the ‘Listener Seven’ published a letter in the Listener Magazine titled ‘In Defence of Science’, this caused quite a lot of negative criticism as it claimed that ‘Indigenous Knowledge’ (Matauranga Maori) falls far short of what is defined as Science. February 2020 the NZ Cabinet proposed changes to NS Senior School curriculum, this being describe as ‘Maori Pathways’. Seven University Professors including Elizabeth Rata penned a letter that was published in the 31st July issue of the NZ Listener publication that expressed disagreement with two reports assertions. That science has been used to support the domination of Euro-centric views including colonialism and the suppression of Maori knowledge, and that the notion science is a Western European invention and that in itself evidence of domination over Maori and Indigenous People.

The response to this was argued “that science was universal to humanity with origins in Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, Ancient Greece and India. Saying that science is not a tool of colonialism. They alleged that placing indigenous knowledge on the same level of science would patronise and fail indigenous populations. Instead, they proposed ensuring that everyone had the opportunity to participate in the world’s scientific enterprises. However the University was not happy with this saying that the view Matauranga Maori must be protected and only be transmitted by Maori as to the principles of Universities and the Royal Society. A Massey University Chemistry Professor criticized the Royal Society as being shameful in its investigations referring to the Listener Magazine articles, and urged there be open debate and discussion  on the subject of Matauranga Maori and Science.

NZ Free Speech Union spokesman Jonathan Ayling argued that the pursuit of science depends on free speech and accused the Royal Society of “abandoning its own heritage and tradition of academic freedom”. On 11 March 2022, the Royal Society published the decision of its Initial Investigation Panel, which concluded that the “complaints should not proceed to a Complaints Determination Committee” on the basis of clause 6.4(i) of the Complaints Procedures: “the complaint is not amenable to resolution by a Complaint Determination Committee, including by reason of its demanding the open-ended evaluation of contentious expert opinion or of contested scientific evidence amongst researchers and scholars”. The Auckland University Vice Chancellor Dawn Freshwater when referring to calling Matauranga Maori not akin to science said ” this caused considerable hurt and dismay among staff, students and alumni” and that the institution has respect for Matauranga Maori as a valuable knowledge system, that it is not at odds with western empirical science and does not need to compete”. The Tertiary Education Union (TEU) that represents academics eg professors, released a statement saying they ‘neglected to engage with or mention the many highly accomplished scholars and scientists in Aotearoa who have sought to reconcile notions of science, mātauranga Māori, and Māori in science.’

The Royal Society Te Apārangi released a statement saying “The Society strongly upholds the value of mātauranga Māori and rejects the narrow and outmoded definition of science outlined. The NZ Association of Scientists eleased a statement saying “we were dismayed to see a number of prominent academics publicly questioning the value of mātauranga to science”. Tara McAllister said “Māori were the first scientists in Aotearoa.’ Tina Ngata said “this is a true testament as to how racism is harbored and fostered within NZ Academia”. In July 2021 the Auckland University Professors Shaun Hendy and Associate Prof., Siouxsie Wiles penned an open letter expressing disagreement as to the views expressed by the ‘Listener Seven’ which included Elizabeth Rata and six other professional experts. They argued that indigenous knowledge is compatibly with western understandings of the scientific method, that Matauranga Maori is unique, complements western knowledge systems. They also added that ” the diminishing role of indigenous knowledge in science was “simply another tool for exclusion and exploitation”. and its an ongoing role in perpetuating scientific racism that justify s colonization, that this is feeling mistrust of science”

National Party MP Paul Goldsmith stated “We should learn about Maori understandings of the world, but not at the expense of our expertise in what the rest of the world call science.” Auckland University of Technology of Environmental Science professor Lindsay White and University of Auckland Professor Brian Boyd published a joint letter on the website ‘Newsroom’ defending the co-authors of the Listener letter from accusations of racism and urging universities and the Royal Society to uphold academic freedom and scientific inquiry. In December 2021 University of Auckland Vice Chancellor Dawn Freshwater announced there woulkd  be a symposium held early in 2022 to discuss, debate the relationship between Matauranga Maoori and Science, where viewpoints could be heard and discussed as a commitment to academic freedom of speech, however in March 2022 a spokesperson for the University confirmed that the symposium had been delayed.

At the end of March 2022 73 Royal Society fellows signed a motion of ‘no confidence’ in the Society over its treatment of the Listener Seven which included Elizabeth Rata.

Finally, the issue of addition of Mātauranga Māori to the science curriculum in New Zealand, and a more general exploration of the issue of intrusion of ideology into scientific institutions, was discussed in a paper by Abbot et al. entitled “In Defense of Merit in Science”, published in April 2023 in the Journal of Controversial Ideas

RESEARCHER: Cassie (Carol Sakey)

Are we living in are globalist coup effectuated a wealthy powerful international elitists that are ambitiously determined to control all of humanity, executed by various International instruments, regulations, restrictions, controls and policies. Time and time again I hear leaders of UN Nation States, Christopher Luxon since becoming the leader of NZs  governing Coalition Party eluding to the International Rules Based Order. As an avid researcher my curiosity got the better of me as I asked myself “Is there a difference between International Law and the International Rules Based Order, if there is then what is it and what does it mean”?

My research led me to the following:-The International Rules Based Order ignores ‘Human Rights Laws”. That China’s Communist Government want their own ‘International Rules Based Order”

There are double standards when it comes to Human Rights however the Universal Declaration of Human Rights insists that the Rules Based International System must be founded on Human Right and applied to everyone, everywhere. Ever since UN’s creation there has been inadequate to say the least response to Human Rights violations that has taken place all around the world. Since the beginning of 2020 these have been massively violated mandating populations to become human lab rats, the injecting of experimental substances into the arms of babies, from the cradle to the grave. (IA 2030 leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age’. The huge weaponizing of freedom of thought, opinion, speech, the tracing, tracking of civilians worldwide, building up a treasure trove  personal digital information, described as ‘Digital Governance’  (Digital Surveillance and Digital Censorship equates to a top down global  totalitarian Digital Regime .

Revolutionary Leftist Socialist minority groups hamstrung by demanded that they have self determining rights that the rest of the population must cede their self determining rights.. The global powerful International Rules Based Order that sparks fear into the minds of populations globally to obtain the Future they Want, this future is called ‘The wonderful world of Utopia, where we are all told time and time again ‘For the Common Good Of All’. Our Common Future, the communist global manifesto. Our Common Future includes everyone has exactly the same wants, beliefs, hopes etc., that peoples lifestyles are determined in in exactly the same way, the destruction of individual thoughts, individual lifestyles this is global Totalitarian Top Down Tyranny. (A Global Communist Regime controlling everyone, everything on this planet)

Hypocrisy and staggering double standards were UN Nation States cannot criticize human rights violations just because their interests are at stake. This has happened in NZ when the ACT Party put a motion into the House (Parliament)., calling China out on Genocide. In the end other parties were more worried about their relationship with China so took out the word Genocide and softened the content within the motion. (This quite simply explains how the International Rules Based Order works)  UN Member State Governments fail to put their heads above the parapet to take a stand against Human Rights Violations even when it comes to millions being tortured, imprisoned and murdered. No wonder within the parameters of UN States themselves Human Rights Abuses continue to happen.  All that this International Rules Based Order can use as an excuse is ‘Blame Colonization’. Wake up the whole world has been colonized by different cultures, ethnicities, tribes etc.,  Whats the real reason? Of course its globalized Citizenship a One World International Order to rule, order the populations of the world.

Time and time again they voice its all about race, I disagree, if they can find an excuse they will use it. Its all about divide, conquer and the victim approach, the blame and shame game. Destroy westernization destroy the family destroy your personal identity, destroy sovereign nations, mass migration dilute traditional sovereign nations, destroy Christianity, destroy motherhood and fatherhood replace XX and XY with LGBTQ1+ 120 or more gender ideologies. Replace Science and Biology with Ideology  and dramatic theatre. UN Nation States Governments have jumped on board with this, hence we have an uncontrollable corrupted insane world. Corrupt, disruptive Woke institutions that are fully funded and promoted by Human Rights Commissions. The Rules based order is seen as a concept developed by political scientists and politicians that does not take into fall account International Law

The International Rules Based System makes no attempt to proclaim a legal order with defined rules and law making. It is an alternative regime outside that of the discipline of International Law which actually threatens individuals rights, instead works for the revolutionary collective minority groups. Political scientists often study elites, who seek to acquire and to maintain power by invoking and manipulating international law to suit their own individual interests, they fit nicely under that of which I call an International Rules Based System.

International Law is the independent good for all citizens of the world promotes individualism (individual human rights) Where each of us all have self determining rights. Freedom of speech is where any sort of voiced opinion criticism lies in the ears of the beholders not controlled by a top down totalitarian regime. The Rules and Principles of International Law are universally accepted principles of international law include the following: that a state will respect the sovereign equality of all states; that a state will refrain from the threat or use of force against another state except in self-defence; and that states will settle their dispute by peaceful means. The ultimate basis of international obligation, for sociological jurists, is the society itself. They contend that social necessities provide not only the origin, but also the basis and the validating criterion of law

International Law is premised on the values of the internal community enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. The  deliberate ignorance to condoning of massive Human Rights Violations fits under the International Rules Based System where genocidal communist regimes and socialist leftist are protected, where corrupt feet of the WEF C EO’s have their feet under the table of the UN which I personally believe is the International Rules Based System. The International Rules based System has been described as “nothing but a tool for a select group of  global elitists, for selective countries to advance their own exploitive ambitions. Under the International Rules Based Order there is an overarching authority enforcement authority that often goes completely unchallenged. UN Nation States Government sign the citizens of the country up to UN Treaties, Agreements without any consideration as to what the majority population want or do not want, this goes unchallenged, the collaboration of an International Rules Based System (Order)

The ultimate basis of international obligation, for sociological jurists, is the society itself. They contend that social necessities provide not only the origin, but also the basis and the validating criterion of law. “China exhibits a flexible approach to international law that enables it to benefit from and exploit the international order without the need to advocate changes to the letter of the law in most areas”. But China wants it own International Rules Based Order

RESEARCHER: Carol Sakey (Cassie)