Putting the ‘Con’ in ‘Consensus’ There is no 97% consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues (Appeared in the Financial Post May 2015). It was the lead up to the Paris Climate Summit, there was massive activist pressure in and on all governments to fall in lines with the ‘global warming’ agenda, to accept emission targets which was reported as “could harm our economy”. Governments worldwide, including NZ’s threw out domestic economy under electric vehicles, wind and solar farms, the economy was to be like a train wreckage

It was reported that 97% of scientists agreed with the climate change debate, as it turns out that was a massive lie, it was made up. Climate Activist Bill McKibben claimed there was a consensus that greenhouse gases are a ‘grave danger’. He was challenged, asked where his source of information came from, he promptly withdraw it. Barack Obama US President at the time sent out a tweet claiming ‘97% climate experts believe global warming is ‘real’ man -made and dangerous”, he was referring to a survey that did not even ask that question, he made it up

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50%) of the post 1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. (But does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, its unknown as to how many experts agree with this). And the statement, even if were true, does not imply that we face a crisis requiring massive restructuring of the worldwide economy. In fact, it is consistent with the view that the benefits of fossil fuel use greatly outweigh the climate-related costs. One commonly cited survey asked if carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and human activities contribute to climate change. But these are trivial statements that even many IPCC skeptics agree with. Both statements are inconsistent with the view that climate change is harmless. So there are no policy implications of such surveys, regardless of the level of government.

The most highly cited papers supposedly found 97% of published scientific studies support man-made global warming. But in addition to poor survey methodology, that tabulation is often misrepresented. Most papers show that 66% actually took no position. Of the remaining 34%, at least 33% supported at least a weak human contribution to global warming. OK, so divide 33 by 34 and there you have it 97%, however 33% includes many papers that critique key elements of the IPCC position. There are more recent surveys that shed light on what atmospheric scientists actually think. Bear in mind that on a topic as complex as climate change, a survey is hardly a reliable guide to scientific truth, but if you want to know how many people agree with your view, a survey is the only way to find out.

In 2012 the American Meteorological Society (AMS) surveyed its 7,000 members, receiving 1,862 responses. Of those, only 52% said they think global warming over the 20th century has happened and is mostly man-made (the IPCC position). The remaining 48% either think it happened but natural causes explain at least half of it, or it didn’t happen, or they don’t know. Furthermore, 53% agree that there is conflict among AMS members on the question.

They are liars, there was no 97% consensus on man-made global warming. Half reject the IPCC conclusion, more than half acknowledge that their profession are split on the issue. The Netherlands Environmental Agency published a survey of International Climate Experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, 1868 responses were received. The questions referred only to the post 1950 period. 66% agreed with IPCC that global warming had happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either  did not know or think human influence was not dominant. Again NO 97% Con(Sensus) behind the IPCC

The Netherlands Environmental Agency recently published a survey of international climate experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, and 1868 responses were received, a similar sample and response rate to the AMS survey. In this case the questions referred only to the post-1950 period. 66% agreed with the IPCC that global warming has happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either don’t know or think human influence was not dominant. So again, no 97% consensus behind the IPCC. The Dutch survey that described ‘climate experts’ a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. But the Dutch survey is even more interesting because of the questions it raises about the level of knowledge of the respondents. Although all were described as “climate experts,” a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. Of 46 per cent of the Dutch survey respondents – nearly half – believe the warming trend has stayed the same or increased. And only 25 per cent agreed that global warming has been less than projected over the past 15 to 20 years, even though the IPCC reported that 111 out of 114 model projections overestimated warming since 1998. ¾ of the respondents disagreed, or strongly disagreed with the statement “Climate is chaotic and and stated it cannot be predicted.”

The  IPCC said in its 2003 report: “In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore “the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” There are unresolved discrepancies between models, observations regarding issues like warming in the tropical troposphere and overall climate sensitivity, and Natural Climate variability. Its much too difficult to realistically climate model, simulate clouds. Clouds are an enormous influence in Climate Assessments, conclusions.

Lots of people get called ‘Climate Experts’ and they appear to contribute to the appearance of ‘consensus’, without necessarily even be knowledgeable about the core issues. A massive consensus by the misinformed really is NOT a Consensus.. It’s a big Fat Lie. Its worth nothing of any value. The phony claim of 97% consensus is mere political rhetoric aimed at stifling debate and intimidating people into silence. The Barack Obama’s website (barackobama.com) says “97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and man-made … People I urge you to call out all these political corrupt propagandists that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington.

They laugh at you if you dare to publicly debate, discuss this Global Warming Agenda. They derail, shut people down. They even shut the real scientists down. This is not real science, this is about controlling populations worldwide into smart cities, to eat bugs and plant foods. To destroy farming communities, small businesses.This is Corporate Capture world wide, the profiteers are those that are the DAVOS Crowd. The WEF and the UN. The WEF representing the Multistakeholder Corporations. The UN with their International Rules. Like hand in glove WEF and UN official partnership agreement 13^th June 2019.. The United Nations implements their one world global governance rules and regulations worldwide to be adopted by UN State’s (Includes New Zealand) and the Corporations are deployed worldwide to accelerate the Global One World Governance Agenda to enslave populations worldwide.  UN Agenda 2030. Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age.

Those political cronies that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington with their political policing are determining that the people have no voice to call them out on their corruption and lies. I urge you do not remain silent stand up, the more you speak up publically the easier it gets. It may seem uncomfortable, you may feel nervous at first but the more you do this, the more courage you get, the more empowered you are. Remember Silence is the CON in CONSENT.

God Save New Zealand.

Link:  https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues

We the people need to drain the swamp again another UN Agreement signed by the Labour Party only a few weeks before the General Election. I question how legal is this when Parliament has already broken up and resumes by different parties, hopefully when Parliament reopens..??

Daily Telegraph NZ 22^nd September 2023 reported Winston accuses Mahuta of breaking constitutional convention over UN Agenda 2030 Agreement signing.

Nanaia Mahuta has signed the ‘Beyond Biodiversity National Jurisdiction Agreement (BBNJ) at the UN in New York on 21^st September 2023. Winston Peters has accused her of breaking the ‘caretaker government’ constitutional convention in signing the international UN agreement. This agreement is part of the accelerated push across the world of the UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals (SDGs). To manage at lease 30% of the worlds terrestrial and inland water area by the year 2030. Parliament has already risen and its less than 2 weeks from when early voting begins which is the 2^nd October 2023. This should have been left for the next government to deal with. Mahuta when interviewed said she was doing this on behalf of Aotearoa New Zealand. Wrong the name of our country is still officially New Zealand you will not find Aotearoa on the world map. The dirty tricks of Labour, this UN Agreement is open for signatures for another two years, but she chose to do this just before the election

Why would you ever trust those behind the closed doors of Parliament, of course they all knew about this, but they all kept it secret from the public eye, until it was signed. There you have it, this means that UN approval will be required when it comes to shipping and deep sea mining, all activity on the high seas. This also means the inclusion of a diverse range of voices beyond UN Nation States (Beyond New Zealand) The BBNJ is legally binding under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This was agreed upon under the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework in December 2022.

The Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted at COP15 it represented the most ambitious global agreement on biodiversity in the history of environmental governance, serves as the worlds framework for actions taken at all levels as to worldwide biodiversity. This has extensive provisions as well as reference to ‘survey activities, prospecting, exploitation in relation to seabed mining. The implementing of sustainability and blue economic objectives. The agreement Mahuta signed is interlinked with the SDG’s of Agenda 2030, namely to contribute to the realization of the ASDGs learning opportunities (SDG4) gender equality (SDG5), sustainable economic growth (SDG8 and climate action (SDG 13), Oceans (SDG14) All Global Goals.

Agenda 2030 Target 14.C aims to enhance the conservation sustainable use of the oceans and their resources by implementing this international law under the Convention, with international efforts on the attainment of the SDGs by using science, education and gender empowerment as drivers for this one world global transformation. The UN Agreement Mahuta provides a legal basis for partnerships with the private sector and holders of traditional knowledge. Drives a codification of new norms.

The Global Biodiversity Frameworks refers to ‘valuing nature after COP 15, systems, policy, action. The key takeaways include- Giving corporate sectors an economic reason to act in support of the GDF objectives. Where Nature is essential to the global economy, in accounting systems and corporations etc.,  Today there are Public/Private asset classes that offer ‘nature positive investments’. Leaders of Governments help scale up so called sustainable investments by detailing policies, objectives of  the Global Biodiversity Framework (Corporate Capture)

The GBF articulated by the Kunming Montreal COP15 is Agenda 2030 Target 19 focuses on the mobilization of US$200 billion annually by 2030 from public and private sources, is crucial for large businesses, corporations and governments. New Zealand Government joined nearly 200 parties in adopting the Kunming Montreal Biodiversity Framework on 19^th December 2022 at COP 15 meeting all but two countries signed up to this. Conservation Minister Poto Willians refers this global deal of nature as protecting land and oceans, ecosystems where the government committed to $1.3 billion to International Climate Finance to support global ambition. NZ doubling its contribution to the Global Environment Facility to $23.5 million

Poto Williams states “The global biodiversity framework recognizes the essential contribution of Maori and other Indigenous peoples to UN Sustainable management, and now we must partner with others to play our part. To implement our commitments through Te Mana  o te Taiao” . NZ Government introduced a National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity (NPSIB). This includes a Biodiversity Credit System Iwi Elite and Government Partnership. The growing interest in investing in Nature partnering with Local and Central Govt.

Researched By Carol Sakey

https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2022-media-releases/new-zealand-welcomes-new-global-deal-for-nature/

https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/biodiversity/Biodiversity-credit-system-snapshot.pdf

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/winston-accuses-mahuta-of-breaking-constitutional-convention-over-agenda-2030-agreement-signing/?fbclid=IwAR1gFTMw9xmhJFKhKStUk9W2GtwQQL2JmZSiGhkivnAG2kJjKJEEmDQEafY

COMPHREHENSIVE SEXUALITY EDUCATION. A Review of UNESCO and WHO Standards April 2023 Authored by the ‘Safe Schools Alliance UK’ includes the methodology, Global Reach, Sexuality, Grooming, Gender Ideology, Pedophilic Policy, The Sexualized Concept of the Child a Global Review. The review is of two standards of documents produced by UNESCO and WHO both UN Agencies they underpin the global initiative for ‘Comprehensive Sexual Education (CSE), being promoted by UNESCO (UN)s ‘ Foundation for Life and Love Campaign’. This being completely compatible with the ‘Queer Theory’ entrenched into children’s school classrooms worldwide. This is NOT a safe guarding our children approach but the significantly hugely putting our children at increasing risk of child sexual abuse and exploitation within and beyond the classroom. WHO and UNESCO standards, guidelines depend on unquestioning acceptance that children are sexual from birth.

UN Agencies recognize a child as a person under the age of 18 years and they cater for the ages 0-15 plus and 5 to 18 plus respectively During these age specifications the child is considered to have a right to sexual pleasure, the same sexual knowledge as adults. Thus referred to as ‘children’s as having sexual rights’, presented as ‘the rights to prevent ill health’ therefore ‘protection from abuse’. The UN Sexuality Education is intended to influence the developments of a child’s personality, social interactions and sexual behaviors, an embedded gender ideology with a view to body modification in children’s sexuality education from their earliest years. They see this as justification for providing sexuality education from birth

Sequencing of sexuality education is recommended with the use of matrices, which adopt an iterative approach to repeatedly layer and consolidate sexual knowledge, attitudes, skills and experience throughout the childs life. This is an internationally approved framework- the sexualized grooming of our children worldwide. Sexual grooming to desensitize children to sexual content and behaviors. The onus to protect children from the exposure to sexual knowledge and experiences in the form of sexuality education from infancy will empower them, this is a huge major shift from ‘parental rights to protect their children from harm to where the State the puppets of UN Agencies are demanding control of our children through indoctrination, manipulation, coercion and massive lies.

WHO has reframed all human social interactions in childhood, including parent-child relationships and platonic friendships. Ordinary non-sexual behaviors are now subsumed under the mantle of sexuality education, a completely flexible approach to sexuality teaching ahead of any safeguarding of children. There is no prescribed limit upon sexual knowledge or experience at any age with zilch consideration of child protection from sexual abuse and sexual exploitation. Age consent being seriously undermined. UNESCO and WHO call this a ‘holistic approach’ to education. Sexuality education embedded in every lesson taught whether it be math’s, English or whatever, children are unable to escape this by being withdrawn from one particular class. The UNESCO approach is branded ‘comprehensive sexuality education’, which means refusal to engage in sexual activity may be possible for an unspecified but limited time in a child’s life, determinable by the child because of their sexuality education. However, in contradiction, the underlying principles and philosophies remain the same as those of ‘holistic’ sexuality education, which sexualize the child, and their activities, from birth.

The UNESCO approach is branded ‘comprehensive sexuality education’, which means refusal to engage in sexual activity may be possible for an unspecified but limited time in a child’s life, determinable by the child because of their sexuality education. However, in contradiction, the underlying principles and philosophies remain the same as those of ‘holistic’ sexuality education, which sexualize the child, and their activities, from birth. UNESCO and WHO persist with a radical, and therefore experimental approach. UNESCO’s uncritical centralization of ‘gender identity’ in children’s education was found to be a continuation of the experimental work of (alleged) child sex abuser John Money. Of Morrisville New Zealand. He was a NZ-American psychologist, sexologist a professor a John Hopkins University. He created the concept of ‘gender’ through experimentation. His cruel experiments led two young men to suicide (twin brothers the Reimer twins) they suffered terribly as to being used and terribly abused in  John Williams Money’s experiments. John Money is known as the founder of the Trans movement.

The philosophies underpinning WHO and UNESCO’s standards and guidance, including the concept of ‘childhood sexuality’, is found to be the legacy of the abusive, unethical and unreliable research of Alfred Kinsey. Much can be researched about this on line

This UN global framework of teaching sexuality in classrooms worldwide has creating a significant risk of childhood sexual exploitation, and a very serious risk to the overall health for our children. This is clearly institutional child sex abuse, sexual grooming on a global scale. NOTE; UNESCO (UN) presents global recommendations and WHO (UN) are regional recommendations, guidelines for sexuality education. In 2018 WHO collaborators International Planned Parenthood (IPPF) researched the status of sexuality education across 53 WHO member organizations. Now UN Member Nations Governments have committed to UNESCO Global Education2030 Agenda, specifically global development goal number 4 (SDG4). CSE Education ‘Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education, promote lifelong learning opportunities for all’. Resources have been presented to parliamentarian worldwide. Childrens exposure to graphic and ideological extremist material is part of the sexuality education curriculum in schools. Education has been severely corrupted by the sexualization of children and politicized in favor of unscientific, contentious beliefs around sex, sexuality and gender

The international influence of the UNESCO and WHO standards cannot be underestimated. I urge all New Zealanders that believe in protecting our children from harm to demand that whoever sits in Parliament to take a ‘safe guarding approach’. The safety and wellbeing of our children is to be the utmost of importance, consideration in all analysis, evaluation, relevant materials and resources. Protect our children from harm, exploitation, abuse, maltreatment.

Putting Child Protection first and foremost, remove all ideology of sexuality out of schools, remove pseudo science, remove the lies and corruption, remove the sexual exploitation. Ban the political indoctrination and sexual exploitations. No more Drag Queen Story Times in Libraries they belong in adult entertainment not in children lives. Child causality grooming has huge risks as to health issues, anxiety, depression, post traumatic stress and suicidal thoughts. Boys wanting their testicles removed and girls their chests bound.  Where children are sexually exploited, groomed, abused they either become introvert or extravert. If extravert at risk of acting out unacceptable sexual behavior, introverted risks serious emotional, mental health issues and suicidal thoughts.

The deliberate targeting, endangering of our children, there is no room for doubts about this targeting your children, there are no doubts about this. This is NOT a conspiracy theory it is a Global Conspiracy that risks serious harm to children’s lives and the breakdown of family relationships. Surely parents, adults, Aunties, Uncles, Grandparents, Teachers cannot just stand by and let this happen, the deliberated  sexualizing grooming of our children. The whole worlds children have become a global initiative SDG Agenda 2030.

The Ardern Labour led government introduced the non binding UN Agenda 2030 into Domestic Policy thus making it Binding legally. Then Ardern as guest speaker to a Melinda and Bill Gates hosted gathering of WEF Global Shapers that she was the first in the world to adopt UN Agenda 2030 into government domestic policy making it binding. She then advised other UN Nation States to follow her lead.

We as a Nation of Peoples need to demand that those that reside behind the doors of Parliament to ‘end gender theory’ and ‘critical race theory’. All race based legislations, decision making- policies. To call a halt to the global cascading of global international laws, legislations that determine what we do, how we think, what we consume, how we behave and how we live and how our children are being deliberated targeted by this global cascading insanity that is being imposed on us all.

Children are taught to be global citizens, not good law abiding citizens. Those in parliament are deliberately disposing of the loyal patriotic traditionalism of New Zealanders. A major transformative shift ignoring that brave courageous soldiers died to defend our freedoms and liberties. Those soldiers that will never fade away. The people of NZ I urge you to demand of those that sit within parliament to ‘end critical race theory and gender theory NOW. Of course they won’t because all those political cronies on the electioneering campaign path will not share with you that we are all, including our children are being controlled by legislations that have cascaded down from the Global cabal. The World Economic Forum mapping strategic interdependencies SDG 4 Global Education. WEF 2015 fully supports Education Agenda 2030. Transforming Schools of the Future (WEF) Agenda 2030. Introduced globally acted out locally in all UN Nations by parliamentarians, local government ..Local Governments- Councils- Drag Queens  in Libraries Story Time for children.

Here is reality we were introduced to the ‘traffic light’ system during COVID 19 lockdowns. On page 25 WHO global status report, country curricula are rated according to levels, thus adopting a traffic light system according to whether a curriculum is identifies as ‘gender responsive’

1. Grey indicates ‘No Comprehensive sexuality education *Red indicates related curricula, with some themes unspecified  * Amber indicates ‘gender responsive’ curricula in secondary schools  *Green indicates ‘gender responsive’ curricula in both primary and secondary schools

Gender is defined distinctively from biological sex. Much of the developing world is rated ‘green’ or ‘amber’. There is an intense focus on gender identity and LGBTQ+1 lives distinct from biological sex. All underpinned by Human Rights legislation. The Tyranny of Human Rights worldwide. Definitely in New Zealand. Thus this is a RED FLAG for us

Wake Up New Zealand your children being deliberately targeted and are seriously endangered

New Zealand Visa Officers told to ignore criminal activity of migrants to New Zealand. ‘Take them on face value’. RNZ Reported that Immigration officers were told to ignore criminal convictions and investigations, not to read supporting documents on visa applications, not to check work visas at the border so as to accelerate migration visa’s much faster. A completely corrupt visa regime of what is namely UN irregular (Non Legal’ Migration introduced into NZ. Where non-legal becomes legal, where dummy  visa’s were allegedly approved. A system that is completely corrupt and put the people of NZ at serious security risk. Immigration Staff told Stuff about their concerns, about the vis regime. A senior INZ official Peter Elms admitting that visas have been manipulated by bad actors. Now more staff have come forward saying there are serious issues right across the system, which include visitor and student visa’s, where there has been a streamlined approach and this has been mandated

Multiple officials have told Stuff that they were told to ignore criminal convictions and investigations when granting visa’s and residency to individuals. They were told not to open and check attachments on visa applications as this would delay processing times.  Staff told to accept visa’s on face value. One officer tried to decline application under the AEQV scheme, but was over-ruled by senior managers. It was reported there were genuine concerns about an employer exploiting migrants, but a senior manager told them “it had gone over their heads” and he had been told to issue the visa. Officers have said they are deeply unhappy about the migration directives, a lot of officers have left their jobs gone elsewhere to work, many were emotionally affected, because they wanted to do the right thing, and what was happening did not sit well on their conscience.

We are talking about migrants that have committed serious crimes and still issued visa’s. The deliberate ignoring of the risk of serious security issues that are implanted into NZ Society. Visa staff being told to ignore alerts on clients that are criminals. Border staff being told not to intervene where there are question marks on newly arriving work visa holder. Do Not Check them, let them go. There are tensions with many Customs officers whom know this is wrong. Reports of concerns see no action taken. Referencing 200 cases per day of suspicious arrivals. Border staff have been under significant pressure, and concerns about reducing security barriers, allowing what is namely a ‘light touch assessment’

Last November a general instruction to Visa Staff re-classify some high risk applications for a more ‘streamlined’ approach. The removal of human decision making by operating a system called ADEPT, means there is to be no records of area’s of concern. Visa Branch staff under significant pressure not to open documents, just approve and approve and approve.. just approve them. Referencing fake bank statements, CV’s, references and pieces of paper with the typed words “Bless you”.  Visa officers were threatened with Performance Improvement Plans if they did not make enough decisions and so called ‘shout outs’, that is ‘shout outs’ to those that passed the most visa applicants.

Visa staff have spoken out because they cannot see they themselves can force change, they don’t want to see migrant exploitation, morale is bad amongst many visa officers. They say the upper management will only listen if this hits the media. Visa staff have been told to close their eyes to what is going on, just hit ‘approve’. Acting head of Immigration Catriona Robinson said that the govt agency constantly reviews and adjusts settings to speed economic recovery- open border. Obviously means open to crims, and  a serious security risk for all of New Zealand when we do not know who are crossing our borders. She could not provide accurate numbers of fraudulent visa’s arriving in New Zealand. This leaves NZ open, exposed to human trafficking, organized crime, illicit goods, weapons and drugs. Illegal migration by individuals of terrorist groups, jihadists. Human trafficking is a global business generating approximately $150 billion in illegal profits, forced labour, sex trafficking, child trafficking through open borders. It was reported in 2018 that children make up almost one third of all human trafficking of victims worldwide, they are especially vulnerable (UNICEF).  The risk to New Zealand society has significantly increased.

What does the government document about NZs Security threat for the year 2023? Referenced is the Christchurch 15/3/2019 terrorist attack by an Australian Citizen, and reported that there needs to be more discussions around these threats we face reports Andrew Hampton Director-General of Security, whom works with the Cabinet and PM’s office also Govt’s Communications. Bureau. Reports: The traditional identity, faith and political motivations are still identified in violent extremists we detect and monitor in New Zealand but this new trend has emerged around the edges.

The traditional identity, faith and political motivations are still identified in violent extremists we detect and monitor in New Zealand but this new trend has emerged around the edges they are the CCP and Islamic Republic ISIL (ISIS) Daesh etc.,

11^th August 2023 Time News reported that NZ SIS said “China is the main exponent of foreign interference to the Pacific Nation. NZ SIS stating there are a small number of states who attempt foreign interference have the ability to cause significant harm. Referring to Chinese individuals and groups in NZ, NZ SIS is aware of ongoing activity in and against NZ linked to the CCP which is of complex intelligence concern for New Zealand. The wariness of China in the Pacific.

The UN Security Council 10^th February 2023 warns UN Nations States that Daesh/ISIS threats remain high. said the threat has “increased” near areas of active hostilities where the terrorist group and its affiliates are active. “The level of terrorist activity continues to be a concern to member states,” he added.. Refers to radicalizing recruiting new supporters for ISIL/Daesh

Yet in NZ, the  ignoring of  criminals entering NZ, the fast tracking of  visa’s on face value. As this government put New Zealanders lives at serious risk, without care or consideration for the harm this risks to you and your children’s lives.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/daesh-isis-threat-remains-high-un-chief-warns/281389

https://time.com/6303977/new-zealand-foreign-interference-report-china/

https://time.com/6303977/new-zealand-foreign-interference-report-china/

https://www.nzsis.govt.nz/assets/NZSIS-Documents/New-Zealands-Security-Threat-Environment-2023.pdf 53 pages pdf

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/497160/immigration-staff-tell-of-behind-the-scenes-visa-dysfunction