CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

CORPORATE CAPTURE OF GLOBAL FOOD SYSTEMS ‘ THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE WEF AND UN FOOD  AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO)

The Un / WEF Official Partnership was officially adopted 13th June 2019. With a Proviso to jointly  accelerate UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals across the world. (SDGs) Transforming Our Lives By 2030. Leaving No-one Behind- Everyone-Everywhere at Every Age. To collaborate Global Food Security * Transform Agri-food Systems. Resource Management * Digital Global Innovation * Public-Private Partnerships * Multistakeholder Capitalism

However there have been many critics that have raised multiple concerns primarily Civil Society Organizations about the Conflicts of Interests * The Influence of Private Corporation as whisperers in the ears of UN Agencies .This includes the Corporate Capture of the Global Food System and the UN FAO’s role in the Global Food Initiatives that include:-Strategic Partnerships with Corporations (a wide range of stakeholders) including UN Entities * Governments * Leaders of Civil Society and the Private Sector (The Mask they hide behind is (Eradicating Hunger- Poverty World Wide) Global Agenda 2030- SDG 1 and SDG2

The FAO (UN) works in a broader UN Framework in that of Food Security & Nutrition. Guiding Global, Regional and National efforts into Policy & Decision making. And encourages Multistake-holderism dialogue, developing common approaches to Global Food Systems. Supporting UN Member States to create coalitions of Public-Private Actors to foster Agri-food System Transformation. The deepening of institutional engagement as to Global Challenges such as Climate Change – Health – and the coined phrase ‘Sustainable Development

The WEF-UN Collaboration (Partnership) with the FAO (UN)..In 2022 they signed a Letter of Intent to facilitate the channeling of the Private Sector resources towards Transforming Agri-food Systems worldwide. The WEF launched the Food Innovation Hubs Global Initiative with FAO (UN) as the Collaborator. Leveraging Market Based Partnerships with Public-Private and Civil Society Partners to Scale Up Innovations

Critics have reported that the UNs growing collaboration with the WEF is a platform for Transnational Corporations that allows ‘Global Corporate Capture’ and a dialogue of  Global Decision Making. 240 Civil Society Organizations condemned the 2019 WEF-UN Partnership in an Open Letter stating that it ‘Delegitimizes the UN and weakens the role of UN Member States in Global Decision Making – Increasing the influence of corporations, promoting industrial, technological focused solution to Food Security which risks harming small scale farming practices, causing socio-economical problems. Favoring Corporate Interests over that of vulnerable populations-Threatening Human Rights.

Giving disproportionate power to Corporate Interests, undermining  the Democratic State Nature of the UN as it was originally set out to be. With the WEF & UN public-private relationship increasing investment in Agrifood systems, aborting traditional farming. Collaborating on Data & Digital conditions that produce WEF/UN Initiatives Eg: (One Map & the Future Market Place Playbook) With the FAO (UN) and WEF Co-publishing a White Paper titled ‘Transforming Food Systems for Country Led Innovation’

The WEF/FAO (UN) Food Summit and the Digital and Data Coalition. The WEF long standing relations with UN Agencies. The Alignment of Food Systems Transformation.  Inclusive Partnerships with common goals. The common goal of Transforming Global Food Systems. Providing Data and Stats crucial for informing Policy and Tracking Progress in the Transformation of Global Food Systems

Partnerships that are focused on attracting Investment for the Transformation of Global Food Systems, this includes how Food is Produced, Distributed and Consumed globally. The total destruction of the Free-market Enterprise Innovated Economy (The Freedom To Choose). Multistakeholder Capitalism Klaus Schwabs baby (600 Page Global Redesign Initiative 2010) Produced and adopted post the 2008-2009 World  Financial Recession. Adopted by Governments worldwide

Critics state that this approach shifts Economic Governance away from Competitive Markets towards a model of Self Appointed Group of Corporate and Political Elites. There are also many critics that view the annual DAVOS gatherings as an Undemocratic Opaque Governance Venue where powerful political and corporate leaders make decisions without accountability to the public they represent in UN Member Nation States thus diminishing National Sovereignty

Never let a Good Crisis Go To Waste. Large Corporate Interests that prioritize Conformity over Disruption. The WEF is accused of ‘Crony Capitalism’. Where Corporations use their influence to lobby for favorable regulations and protectionism through Legislations at the expense of a genuine Free-Market enterprising Innovative Economy. Corporations accused of Green Washing (ESG’s)

Initiatives such as the Great Reset proposed by the WEF, advocating for the restructuring of the Global Economy. The lack of Democratic Engagement within UN Member Nation States and Beyond -Globally that do not reflect the interests of UN Member State or Global Population interests but those of the Economical /Political Elite. The Stakeholder Capitalism model seeks to shift responsibility beyond shareholders to a broader group of stakeholders has been criticized as rebranding of the worlds economy. And the Erosion of National Sovereignty

The increasing influence of the WEF over UN Nation State policies and the erosion of National Sovereignty is not without serious concern. The WEF pushing for Global Governance Models that by-pass Nation State Legislatures without civil societies explicit consent. The WEF Global Digital Identification Systems, * Centralized Climate Policies * International Tax Frameworks all encroachments on Nation State Government and the voting public of the Sovereign Nation State. Decision making that cannot be challenged, hence the government is not held accountable by its voting  citizens

The WEF a strong powerful proponent of the Forth Industrial Revolution which encompasses Artificial Intelligence * Automation * Biotechnology being implemented even though populations worldwide have serious concerns about this push into a Technocratic Future of Controlling Forces of Compliancy. The WEF reporting its Vision ‘A Technology Driven Future that includes Mass Digital Surveillance which is being played out rapidly across the world eight now. AI Digital Identification Global Governance (Transforming Our Live by 2030. UN Agenda 2030 SDG 16.9 Everyone is to have a digital ID by 2030) Otherwise you wont be recognized as existing.

NZ participating in the WEF Pilot ‘Digital Regulations’. Without transparency. Did the Government share this information publicly? NO. Was there any public discussion- debate with  the population of NZ. No.  WEF mass digital surveillance, monitoring and a push for a ‘cashless society’. Digital Identity Systems. Government/Corporate surveillance restricting individual autonomy- freedoms- liberties. (Judith Collins Portfolio)

COVID 19 – The WEF played an increasing significant role in shaping Global Health Policies particularly during the COVID Pandemic. Collaborating with Organizations like the WHO (UN) and major Pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) to influence  Vax Policies, Digital Health Passes and Pandemic Preparedness Strategies. Concerns have been raised about the WEFs role in promoting policies that benefit Bif Pharma at the expense of transparency and Public Choice. The rapid push for vaccine mandates and Digital Health Passports seen by some as an over-reach prioritizing Corporate Interests over Individual Freedoms

The WEF and the UN have positioned themselves as a global force, with zilch accountability to National Sovereignty and the people whom vote political parties in. This empowers a small global powerful elite to shape the Global Future that do not align with the broader interests of Humanity. This is a global concentration of centralized power (Top Down and Bottom Up) that poses a huge risk to our personal- individual freedoms. Where Governments engage with the WEF /UN behind closed doors when they collaboration – plan to implement the Transforming Of Our Lives before 2030. (Leaving No-One Behind..Everyone..Everywhere.. At Every Age)

We No… What They Are Doing.. They Know- We know what they are Doing.. But they still keep on Doing it.. Yet there is a deafening Silence in the public Arena as the UN Member State Puppets implement ‘Transforming Our Lives By 2030’ Locking us into a Digital Prison. Industrial Corporate Global Food Systems and Smart City Surveillance-Monitoring-Facial Recognition.

WakeUpNZ.. RESEARCHER: Cassie

 

 

...

Other Blog Posts

Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN COMMISSION ‘DEATHS POST COVID JAB’

A written question to the Commission ‘European Parliament submitted 13th April 2023
Deaths that have been caused by COVID Vaccines (Reported by European Parliament)
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) reported that 11 448 people have died in the EU following COVID-19 vaccines[1],
8 368 following Pfizer BioNTech vaccinations (which is 1 345 more deaths in 2022).
1 579 following AstraZeneca vaccinations.
1 161 following Moderna vaccinations.
339 following Janssen vaccinations.
1 following Nuvaxovid vaccinations.
0 following (inactivated, adjuvanted) Valneva vaccinations.
As of 10 April 2023, a total of 50 648 deaths caused by ‘COVID vaccines’ had been reported in EudraVigilance – broken down by disease (heart conditions, central nervous system disorders, etc.). Why then, in the EMA’s latest report of 8 December 2022, is it stated that only 11 448 deaths were flagged and recorded in the EudraVigilance database?
A link was provided Latest figures published by the EMA on 8 December 2022 (situation as of 23.11.2022 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/covid-19-vaccine-safety-update/covid-19-vaccines-safety-update-8-december-2022_en.pdf)

...

A POLITICAL CASH COW ‘$300 M’ FOR INDIGENOUS FARMERS IN NZ – WILL WINSTON EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION?

Speakers in the Beehive embrace IPCC (UN) Climate Change Assessment corrupt reports for policy making. Scientists have complained the information that does not fit the global narrative has been deleted, changed, this being a political tactic and a ‘cash cow’ for those that follow the political climate doom and gloom narrative. Farmers are still being used as the govts whipping boy as the ‘corporate capture’ of New Zealand expands.

t is widely reported the seas are rising to such an extent that population will have to relocate inland, however  new homes and huge apartments are being built on the coast, a great investment for large businesses. Never let a good crisis go to waste.

The UN/WEF and many of their cohorts including UN Nation States Governments call these crisis events as a ‘window of opportunity’. They also quote “Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age” in their transformation of economies, society worldwide.

The IPCC Assessment Reports are taken as factual upon policy making in NZ and in other UN Member State Governments. The 2023 General Election is over, will Winston Peter’s expose this political corruption?

 

Researched By Carol Sakey

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

NZ PANDEMIC PLAN- A FRAMEWORK FOR PANDEMIC ACTION ‘INTERIM UPDATE JULY 2024- PAGE 125’

SPECIAL POWERS: Special powers are authorized by the Minister of Health or by an Epidemic Notice – these apply where an emergency has been declared under the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act

THE POWER TO DETAIN: The power to detain, isolate, quarantined – allows a medical officer of health to ‘require persons’, places, buildings, ships, vehicles, aircraft, animals or things to be isolated, quarantined or disinfected (Section 70 (1)(f) NOTE:  ENTER YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT

THE POWER TO PRESCRIBE PREVENTIVE TREATMENT: Allows a Medical Officer of Health, in respect of any person who has been isolated or quarantined, to require people to remain where they are isolated, quarantined until they have been medically examined and found to be free from infectious disease, and until they have undergone such preventive treatment as the Medical Officer of Health as prescribed. NOTE: MEDICATION THAT YOU MAY NOT CHOOSE TO CONSUME

THE USE OF FORCE: Section 71A states that a member of the Police may do anything reasonable necessary (including the use of force) to help a Medical Officer of Health or any person authorized by the Medical Officer of Health in the exercise or performance of powers or functions under Sections 70 or 71 NOTE: CAN USE FORCE ON YOU IF NOT COMPLIANT

THE ONE HEALTH RESPONSE: Just like the 17 Global Development Goals of Agenda 2030 the ‘One Health Response’ is an interconnected one. That Humans, Animals- Wild, Domestic.. the Oceans, the Plants, the Soil and the Tree’s are all interconnected as a ‘One World Eco-system’

The New Zealand Pandemic Plan sets out the health system strategy and framework for actions for preparing for and responding to future pandemics. It can be adopted and applied (with adaptations as necessary) to any pandemic event. It sets out the health system strategy and framework for actions in preparing for and responding to future pandemics. While the plan is focused on respiratory pathogens, such as influenza and COVID-19, it can be adopted and applied (with adaptations as necessary) to any pandemic, regardless of the nature of the pathogen and its severity. NOTE: REGARDLESS OF THE NATURE OF THE PATHOGEN AND ITS SEVERITY

...
Carol Sakey
Uncategorized

OPERATION POPEYE ‘THE WEAPONIZATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE ‘THE CLIMATE CON’

Operation PopEye was a project carried out by the US Airforce during the Vietnam War 1967-1972. This was a ‘military cloud seeding project’ to control the weather,  it was a highly classified program that attempted to extend the monsoon season o by the Secretary of the State Henry Kissinger and the CIA without the authorization of the Secretary of Defence over specific areas of ‘Ho Chi Minh Trail’, to disrupt North Vietnamese military supplies by softening road services and causing landslides.

The former US Secretary of Defence ‘Robert S McNamara was well aware that there may be objections raised by the Internal Science Community./he sent a memo to the President  saying that “such objections had not in the past been a basis for prevention of military activities considered to be in the interests of the US National Security”

The Chemical Weather Modification Program’ was conducted from Thailand over Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam and allegedly sponsored by Henry Kissinger and the CIA. Melvyn Laird who had categorically denied Congress that a program for the modification of weather for use as a tactical weapon ever existed.

The Report titled ‘Rainmaking In SEASIA outlines the use of ‘lead iodide’ and Silver Iodide deployed by aircraft in a progr the days of rainfall by approximate am that was developed in California at the Navel Air Weapons Station at China Lake and  testing took place in Okinawa, Guam, Philippines and Texas, this was a ‘Hurricane Study Program’ called ‘Project Storm Fury”The objectives of Operation Popeye was to increase rainfall in carefully selected areas to deny the Vietnamese enemy using supply trucks using the roads, where not only did they cause floods, landslides but prevented river crossings.  The goal was to extend to days of rainfall by approximate 30 to 45 days during each monsoon season

The 54th Reconnaissance Squadron carried out the operations using the slogan ‘Make Mud Not War’, these operations started 20th March 1967 and continued through the rainy seasons which are March to November. This continued until 1972.  Operation Cloud Seeding March 1967- until 1972. Three C130 Hercules Aircraft and two F-4C Phantom aircraft were based at Udon Thani Royal Airforce Base in Thailand they flew two ‘sorties’ per day’ (missions). The aircraft were officially on ‘weather reconnaissance missions, the aircraft crews as part of their normal duties also generated weather report data. The crews were all from the 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron, they were rotated on a regular basis from Guam, Inside the Squadron, the Rainmaking Operations were code named ‘Motorpool’

March 1971 there was a public revelation as ‘Operation PopEye was exposed by Jack Anderson through his column called Intermediary ComPatriot.  Also Operation PopeEye had a brief mention in the ‘Pentagon Papers’ and a July 3rd 1972 article in the New York Times ‘. Operations in Laos ceased two days after this article was published

A Weather Modification Hearing took place by the US Senate sub-committee on Oceans and International Environment and on Foreign Relations March 20th 1974. The US Government published documents ‘Keeger Edward C..Foreign Relations of the US 1964-168 Volume XXV11. Laos United States Government Printing Office 1998.

REFERENCES:

1)Rainmaking used as weapon in South East Asia ‘Daytona Beach Morning Journal Florida. The New York Times New Service 19/5/1974.

2) SEASIA Rainmaking Report Dept of Defence 1974 archived from the original retrieved on 12th June 2009

3)Project Storm Fury pdf Report US Dept of the Navy Mat 1974 archived from the original retrieved February 1st 2014

4)ENMOD and the US Congress ‘Sunshine Project’.org archived from the poriginal 27/8/2009 Retrieved 25th July 2009

5)The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War. A political and Social and Military History. ABC-CL102011 Page 921By Us Over The Weather -Willthomas.net. Archived from the original 23rd February 2007 Retrieved  25th July 2009

6) The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition Volume 4. Chapter 2. US Ground Strategy and Force Deployments 1965-1968 pp 227-604 3rd section-mtholyoko edu. Archived from the original on 12th June 2009 Retrieved 25th July 2009

7)Seymour M Hersh July 3rd 1972. Rainmaking is used as a weapon by US cloud seeding in Indo-China is said to be aimed at hindering troop movements and suppressing .

8) Transcript of the US Senate Hearing on Weather Modification 20th March 1974

9) Operation Motorpool Gallery

10)Dr Edwin X Berry 1969 Trip to the Philippines ‘Operation PopEye archived 11/5/2021 at ‘wayback machine’ (berry now at www.climatephysics.com

DEFINITIONS:  Weather Modification is an act of intentionally altering, manipulating the weather.   * Cloud Seeding is a method that condenses clouds to cause rainfall

...