The idea of a cashless society is not a new one, and in some form or another, has been tossed around for decades. With the onslaught of COVID-19, concerns have been raised on whether handling cash can spread the virus. This has once more ramped up the discussion of America becoming a cashless society.
Essentially a cashless society means exactly that. No cash. Nothing. Zilch

Its a fact that a cashless society is is not perfect. Catastrophes, computer glitches or even human error can leave you without the ability to purchase necessities. The Balance points out that these same events make it impossible for merchants to accept payments as well.
A cashless society would leave people more susceptible to economic failure on an individual basis: if a hacker, bureaucratic error, or natural disaster shuts a consumer out of their account, the lack of a cash option would leave them few alternatives

What would happen to these individuals in a cashless society had no ability to open a bank account or had their bank account cancelled, it would become very difficult, if not impossible, for these individuals to purchase necessities.

Basically we are moving into a cashless Orwellian society, where they check everything. Check where you live, whom you visit and communicate with and how your mind works that makes you behave the way you do. Just another massive stepping stone to control populations.

Living in a cashless society also increases the risks of loss of security, privacy as people become even more reliant on technology and the information age. The information age of data modelling that produces so called evidence based results, it’s bad enough now but its going to get so much worse.

Other risks are, its takes a chunk out of small business profits, that’s if you are lucky enough to own a small business after Ardern’s government have finished stripping us all of our rights. Of course when you pay for products with a bank card then in tis digital world the information gained is huge, where you shop, what eat etc.

This new wonderful world of enlightenment and utopia is suppose to be so trusting NOT. A utopian cashless society is merely a mirage, another delusionary socialist, Marxist communist ploy.
Approximately 500 years ago Thomas More’s Utopia has influenced everything from the thinking of Gandhi to the tech giants of Silicon Valley,. More is best known for his invention of a word – and for his development of an idea that would be exported around the world. This concept would shape books, philosophies and political movements as varied as Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, Mahatma Gandhi’s doctrine of passive resistance and the founding of the state of Pennsylvania. The idea, of course, was ‘utopia’.
More coined the word to describe an island community with an ideal mode of government. First published in Latin in 1517, the book Utopia means “no place” in Greek; Some coined the word utopia to describe an island community with an ideal mode of government

More’s Utopia was not the first literary work to play around with policy ideas: dreaming of a better life is an innate part of being human. Is vision was attractive to early socialists who saw this imaginary society as a blueprint for a socialist nation. These became known as the ‘utopian socialists’. Those who favoured an egalitarian distribution of goods, alongside the total abolition of money in order to achieve perfect social and financial equality.

Animal Farm by George Orwell brilliantly exposed the flaws in the communist view of society. The novel offers a view of human behaviour at odds with the philosophies and principles of a ‘perfect society’ as described in Utopia.
Many advocates of the ‘cashless society’ suggest it could offer a better and more-efficient world, but do they also fail to see how the behaviour of humans means the utopia of a cashless society is merely a mirage?

Utopia goes even further back in history to 380BC, when Plato wrote his dialogue, he described it as a communistic egalitarian city-state ruled by philosopher-kings called guardians, made up of both men and women. Instead of procreating within a family unit, these leaders leave the city once a year for a wild sex orgy. The resulting children, happily ignorant of their real parentage and brought up by the state, become the new generation of guardians.

For some people a cashless society may sound like science fiction, however its very real. Citibank and other financial institutions are already discussing, planning this.
The Computer Weekly News on 17/11/2016 reported, Citibank will no longer handle cash at its six branches in … which has been identified as potentially being the first cashless society, Today Citibank call this ‘banking for sustainable development’ (UN Agenda 2030)

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand documented a government paper entitled “Future of Money-Te Moni Anamata. Have your say (a what do you think article).
Below is part of the article a link is provided:-
The Reserve Bank is inviting your feedback on a series of issues papers to test our thinking about how we should approach our new role as steward of the cash system and make sure that central bank money continues to do its job in light of significant changes affecting how New Zealanders pay, receive and save money.
Future of Money – Stewardship (Te Moni Anamata – Kaitiakitanga) seeks your feedback on how we should steward of money and cash following a recent law change. • Future of Money – Central Bank Digital Currency ( Te Moni Anamata – Aparangi ā Te Pūtea Matua) wants your views on how we propose to explore whether a CBDC is right for Aotearoa.
You can both read and give your feedback online for these issues papers by 10am, Monday, 6 December 2021. • Future of Money – Cash System (Te Moni Anamata – Punaha) to publish in November 2021 will explain issues facing the cash system and explore options to achieve greater efficiency and resilience. Feedback will close in February 2022
The link is below and well worth a read.

https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Notes%20and%20coins/Future-of-Money/Future-of-Money-issues-overview.pdf?revision=c7b72a5f-4924-43ef-bd5f-f109db8bfbf2&la=en.

Vaccines have a pitiful grubby history of how they become Intellectual Property. The World Trade Org., (UN) trade related Intellectual Property Rights agreement, this is an extremely undemocratic, an expression of ‘private- public global corporate power’.

Intellectual Property Rights are quite simply explained. If you possess a cow and some-one steals it, you have lost your cow, however if you discover a process to make that cows milk safer to drink, the possession of that knowledge does not reduce your store of it. Jefferson’s famous formulation: he who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me”.

The concept of Intellectual Property was resisted in Europe right into the 20th century as late as 1912. Rejecting Patents that they called a “free trade in inventions”. This was consistent with the liberal doctrine as they were suspicious of patents. The Economist advocated for the abolishment of the English patent system, that was before inventors established a right of property in their inventions. It was viewed that inventors ought to give up all the knowledge and assistance of their inventions, this was suggested in a magazine dated 1850….”That is impossible, and the impossibility shows that their minds and their inventions are, in fact, parts of the great mental whole of society, and that they had no right of property in their inventions”

The first patent system arrived in Elizabethan England not to ’drive innovation’ nut to limited Crown-dispensed monopolies. Actually, the hatred of these monopolies played a starring role in the American Revolution, where the leaders were opposed to patents. Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin thought patents as being impediments to progress. In fact the phrase Intellectual Property was coined in post revolutionary France to obscure the royal origins of monopoly, markets and theories did not fit into rights and property.

The word ‘Property’ itself had an unpleasant ring of ‘Privilege’. Patent was just an unaccepted theory and was very insincere, was viewed with suspicion. Then medicines started to be added to debates. Switzerland first became a pharmaceutical powerhouse, but did not add patents until 1977. Prior to the World Trade Org., (UN) in 1995 there was little power to enforce patents outside a country’s own borders.
Estes Kefauver was a Arkansas Democrat who oversaw an investigation into the post war pharmaceutical industry. He became focused on the industry’s business model, patents, cartel and monopoly pricing. Americans and other around the world then started making markups as high as 7000% on patented drugs, that were created using natural processed discovered in publicly funded labs.

Kefauver revealed that there was corruption and scandals related to the highest markups by Merck and Pfizer as they targeted middle class India and the Nehru Government responded with further investments in the country’s generics industry. In New Delhi they began drafting a new patent law to replace the British colonial regime that was still on their books.

The concept of intellectual property was resisted in Europe into the twentieth century. As late as 1912, Holland rejected patents and maintained what it called a “free trade in inventions.”. Merck CEO John O’Connor announced the patent law “A victory for Global Communism” From thence on, as time proceeded patents become increasing politicization of technology that the US Drug Industry took the lead in formulating the plan that culminated a quarter of a century later in the founding of the world Trade Organization of the United Nations.

In May 1974 a declaration was passed in the UN General Assembly calling for a ‘New International Economic Order’, a more equal distribution of global financial, natural knowledge resources that relates to human health. The UN Vision included a rejection of Intellectual Property as an illegitimate tool of the strongest against the week, a neo-colonial straw designed to continue siphoning wealth from the South to North.

In September 1978 Halfden Mahler a WHO (UN) Director General unveiled an agency program to help poor countries reduce their drug spending by building up their domestic drug industries this came about with the ‘Declaration of Alma-Ata’, to provide health for all by the year 2000. It was affirmed once again by the WHO (UN) that ‘health as being based on equity and social justice’

It is documented that the Alma Ata conference remained unfulfilled because of an obsessive revenge drive of a CEO of Pfizer in 1972, the year that India’s Patents Act entered into force. Developments threatened Pfizers ambitious plans for dominating global markets and agricultural products especially in Asia, however Pfizer lead an industry counter-attack against what is known as the G77. Pfizer’s patent lawyer launched infringement suits globally. In 1962 Pfizer sued the British Government after the National Health Service purchased an Italian generic version of Pfizer patented antibiotic, tetracycline.

Editorials documented that Pfizer owed its power to wartime contracts to produce penicillin which had been discovered and developed in Oxford that had left the public domain. British authorities have been in several legal conflicts with Pfizer. Over quite some time the N World Intellectual Property Org, (WIPO) oversaw the 1883 Paris convention for the protection of industry property.

Of course the Big Tech companies later became all part of the information economy with very powerful interests. In entertainment, software, biotech, agriculture and of course the pharmaceutical industry. Wealthy clubs and Regimes, groups were built around these big techs and big pharma industries.

Nations that refused to recognise the authority of the U S Patents Office were known as rogue nations. There was a tense worldwide struggle for technology supremacy. It was said “all freedom loving nations to get in line behind the proper enforcement and honourable treatment of intellectual property that singled out ‘computers, pharmaceuticals and telecommunication’ as area’s of knowledge being stolen by the denial of patent rights” It was also said that the their was a grab for high technology inventions for underdeveloped countries. Of course the UN and world Economic Forum now obsessively promote Pfizer patents and other Pharmaceutical Companies

Going back to the UN Marrakesh Conference on 15th April 1994, when 124 UN Member States signed the bringing of the World Trade Org., (UN) into existence. A treaty was signed “ a new era of global economic cooperation reflecting the widespread desire to operate in a fairer and more open multilateral trading system for the benefit and welfare of their peoples.” In return for enforcing Western patents on medicines and other technologies, G77 nations were promised access to northern rich markets, and a conditional “freedom from fear”

And hear we are today people ravaged with fear as a global experiment knocks on everyone’s door, as governments demand us all to be human guinea pigs to the pharmaceutical companies, for in New Zealand Pfizer.

BELOW ARE JUST A FEW OF THE LAWSUITS AGAINST PFIZER:-
CNBC report on 16/12/2020 that Pfizer or Moderns under the PREP Act are devoid of being sued if any person has adverse reactions from COVID19 Injections. The Government is not likely to compensate you for damages.

25/06/2019 — Pfizer and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company paid $2.3bn to settle criminal and civil liabilities for illegal promotion of their …

Pfizer lawsuit (re administration of experimental drug in …https://www.business-humanrights.org › latest-news › p…
In a separate action, the Nigerian federal government filed suit against Pfizer and several of its employees in June 2007 seeking nearly $7 billion in …

Pfizer recalls all lots of anti-smoking drug over … – Reuters
https://www.reuters.com › healthcare-pharmaceuticals › pf…16/09/2021 — Pfizer Inc said on Thursday it was recalling all lots of its anti-smoking treatment, Chantix, due to high levels of cancer-causing agents …

Laws suits refer to Pfizer’s Chantix having effects on peoples mental health, suicidal thoughts, depression and also causing suicides have been reported for many years. Chantix was approved by the FDA on the 5th October 2006 to help people quit smoking. There was a voluntary callback of Chantix by Pfizer in September 2021. It has taken 15 years to announce a voluntary call back of Chantix.

BENEFITS AND RISKS: Currently, the FDA tells patients that the benefit of using the voluntary recalled Chantix “is to keep on using it, the benfits outweigh the risks” The World Health Organization takes the same stance as FDA on the benefits and risks as FDA.

COVID19 Injections the same stance applies to the global human experiment of injections..The benefits verses the Risks. The benefits surely belong to the power and money hungry of this world.

PATENTS- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DO NOT PROTECT THE HUMAN LIVES OF BILLIONS OF PEOPLE WORLWIDE WHOSE GOVERNMENTS DEMAND THEY ARE HUMAN GUINEA -PIGS. THE DESENSITIZING AND DEHUMANIZATION OF HUMAN LIFE ITSELF.

THE CLUB OF ROME DOCUMENTS:- ‘The Greenhouse Effect’… “In searching the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would bit the bill…all these dangers are caused by human intervention….the real enemy, then, is humanity itself” ‘The Council of the Club of Rome 1991’

Most influential organizations begin with the meeting of a few like minds. In 1965, Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist, made a speech that proved inspirational to Alexander King, the Scottish Head of Science at the OECD. The two found that they shared a profound concern for the long-term future of humanity and the planet, what they termed the modern ‘predicament of mankind’.

Three years later, King and Peccei convened a meeting of European scientists in Rome. Although this first attempt failed to achieve unity, a core group of like-minded thinkers emerged. Their goal: to advance three core ideas that still define the Club of Rome today: a global and a long-term perspective, and the concept of “problematic”, a cluster of intertwined global problems, be they economic, environmental, political or social.
At the group’s first major gathering in 1970, Jay Forrester, a systems professor at MIT, offered to use computer models he had developed to study the complex problems which concerned the group more rigorously.

An international team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began a study of the implications of unbridled exponential growth. They examined the five basic factors that determine and, in their interactions, ultimately limit growth on this planet – population, agricultural production, non-renewable resource depletion, industrial output and pollution.

The Club of Rome was founded, formed at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy. They described themselves as ‘a group of world citizens sharing a common concern for the future of Humanity.

The Club of Rome consists of current and former Heads of State, UN bureaucrats, high level politician and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, business leaders from around the world

It is the membership of the Club of Rome that has formed a think-tank that provides ‘suggestions to the United Nations that are planned to radicalise the world, transform people, planet for prosperity (profit). The transformation that is going on right before our eyes that relates to COP26, UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030 and IA2030, these are no accidents, nor are they mindless, they have been carefully construed and orchestrated. The Club of Rome think tank have played a huge part in all of this.

The Club Of Rome founded two sibling organizations namely the ‘Club of Budapest’ and the ‘Club of Madrid’, focusing on social and cultural aspects of their agenda also concentrating on the political aspects

The three clubs share many common members and hold joint meetings and conferences, they are ‘all in the one same beast’. The Club of Rome established a network of 33 National Associations. Membership of the main club is limited to 100 individuals at one time.

Al Gore, Maurice Strong are just two of those individuals who are affiliated to the main Club Of Rome through National Associations USACOR, CACOR etc.,
But one must ask who and what is the Club of Rome, it is not some little group of nobody’s or greenie activists or unheard of politicians.
They are senior officials of the UN, current and ex world leaders, founders of environments organizations.

If you research Ann Bressington’s exposure of UN Agenda 21, Club of Rome.

‘The Inconvenient Truth’ Al Gore who led the US delegation to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate Change conference chaired a meeting at the Club of Rome held in Washington DC in 1997

The following are just a few who are members of the Club of Rome:-
Javier Solana, the Secretary General of the ‘Council of the European Union, the representative of EU Foreign Policy and Maurice Strong the former head of the UN Environment Programme and chief advisor to the leader of the UN – Kofi Annan.
Kofi Annan was the Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit and also the co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter and the Kyoto Protocol, also the founder of the Earth Council.

Mikhail Gorbachev the former president of the Soviet Union was a member of the Club of Rome, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation.

Diego Hidalgo an executive member of the Club of Rome with Gorbachev of the Club of Madrid was also the founder and President of the European Council on Foreign Relations in association with George Soros.

Founding member of the Club of Rome and also the president of the ‘Club of Budapest’ is Erwin Lazlo, he also is the chairman of the ‘World Wisdom Council’’.
Anne Ehrlich – Population Biologist is married to Paul Ehrlich, she and hher husband Paul authored many books on human overpopulation
Hassan bin Talal president of the Club of Rome and the president of ‘Arab Thought’ is a member of the UN’s Global Roll of Honour, also a former director of ‘Friends of the Earth’ and the ‘Sierra Club’

Sir Crispin Tickell founder of the World Future Council, named as the United Nations champion of the Earth Forum, a former British Permeant Representative to the UN and permanent Representative to the UN Security Council, also the Chairman of the ‘Gaia Society’.
Sir Crispin Tickell is also the Chairman of the Board of the Climate Institute and a leading British Climate Change Campaigner.

Kofi Annan – former Secretary General of the United Nations. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.
Javier Perez de Cuellar is the former Secretary General of the United Nations.

Gro Harlem Brundtland is the former President of Norway and the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change

Robert Muller is the former Assistant Secretary General of the UN, founder and Chancellor of the UN University of Peace.

The Dalai Lama, the ‘Spiritual Leader’ of Tibet. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Father Berry Thomas a Catholic Priest is one of the leading proponents of deep ecology, eco-spiritualaity and global consciousness.

David Rockefeller is a Club of Rome Executive Member and the former Chairman of Chase, founder of the Trilateral Commission also the executive member of the World Economic Forum.

David Rockefeller donated land on which the United Nations stands.

Stephen Schneider a professor of Biology and Global Change at Stanford was one of the earliest most vocal proponents of man-made global warming, he is also a leader of IPCC Reports.

Bill Clinton the former President of the United States also founder of the Clinton Global Imitative.

Jimmy Carter – former President of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Of course Bill Gates is a member of the Club of Rome. He is the founder of Microsoft, makes his wealth in investing into research that brings him billions of dollars of profit though philanthropy.

Naming a new more members of the Club of Rome including Ted Turners, George Soros, Jimmy Carter, Tony Blair, Deepak Chopra, Desmond Tutu, Henry Kissinger.
Of course there are many more far too many to mention right now, also those associated with Temples of Enlightenment and New Age Spiritual Activists.

George Matthews – Chairman of the Gorbachev Foundation Harlan Cleveland – former Assistant US Secretary of State and NATO Ambassador Barbara Marx Hubbard – President Foundation for Conscious Evolution Betty Williams – Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Marianne Williamson – New Age ‘Spiritual Activist’ and key members of the United Nations and leading professors of Academia. Eco-political and Eco-environmental.

The committee of the Club of Rome include more than 300 members. On the 21st March 2018 the Club of Rome report clled for a new enlightenment stating that is human beings do not fundamentally alter their current lifestyles and the economy planetary boundaries will soon be transgressed.
The bones of UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 were laid out in a series of Club of Rome reports. one of the first being Limits to Growth (1971) this was mainly about ‘overpopulation

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”

This text is taken from the Club of Rome’s 2002 report, Planetary Emergency Plan: Securing a New Deal for People, Nature and Climate.
In that the Great Panic of 2020 (pandemic) is currently dominating the new cycle, don’t think for a minute that radical climate change alarmism has gone away. To the contrary, it is just waiting for the massive funding that will be sprung during the Great Reset

SOURCE: https://www.technocracy.news/club-of-rome-planetary-emergency-plan-declared/

The new traffic light system revealed by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern on Friday will see freedoms restored to fully vaccinated New Zealanders
And those who haven’t received two shots of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine will be largely excluded from eating at restaurants, attending concerts and festivals, and even getting a hair cut.
In other words, those who remain unvaccinated will experience a limited version of daily life in society. THIS IS MORE THAN A WARNING ITS AN EXTREME THREAT
“If you want summer, if you want to go to bars and restaurants, get vaccinated,” Ardern said. “If you want to get a hair cut, get vaccinated. If you want to go to a concert or a festival, get vaccinated.

If you want to go to a gym or sports event, get vaccinated. If you’re not vaccinated, there will be everyday things you miss out on.”
RED = Working from home encouraged. Those vaccinated can visit restaurants attends events with same limits as this on level 2. Limit gatherings limiting 10 people
ORANGE- Close to normal life for vaccinated. But is not because they cannot spends time with their unvaccinated friends at restaurants. Stricter gathering limits, no gyms or hairdressers
GREEN- Essentially normal life for vaccinated, retail hospitality all open no limits. But must be vaccinated. Those venues that don’t use vax certificates they have a limit of 2 customers
As the Government openly publicaly say they are targeting Maori and Pacifika. The Government playing its old game of racist divide, the have’s and have nots.
Divide the nations, let them destroy each other. Power play, control over all peoples. Everyone loses their freedom, compliant or not. This smells of Nazi Germany and the overbearing evilness of a Chinese Communist Regime.

This is a psychological technique that’s being used. ‘Registered clinical psychologist Dr Sarb Johal says it’s important to continue to address the concerns of people in our social circles who are unsure about getting vaccinated:
“Don’t give up on them.” In other words, even if you mentally abuse them, manipulate them and neglect them, torture their minds. Just don’t give up, keep pushing. Do the governments work for them.
This is a bullying tactic, emotionally bullying, and when a number of family members do this its called narcist. A narcist tactic to beat and bully individuals into submission, make them feel guilty, and shame them.
As this psychologist said People roll up their sleeves when they realise they have limits placed on their daily lives. “We have a few weeks, these is going to be critical”
THE FOX SAID TO THE HENS “ITS OK TO COME OUT NOW”

UN Agenda 2030 states that all global targets, there are 169 global targets and 17 SDG’s, Global development Goals. 17 of 18 refer to Climate Alarmism.
14 of 17 Global Strategy for Vaccines. Decade of Vaccines. Leave No-one behind. Everyone, everywhere at every age (UN Global Strategy of Vaccines 2011-2019)
UN Agenda 2030 states that all global targets are aspirational, with a scale or a traffic light system, accompanied by a checklist. How to monitor and assess progress, a global indicator, one that has no agreed methodology.
Thus the UN Environment, with the support from the OECH and other partner institutions, is the custodian agency responsible for developing a methodology that is universally applicable by all countries. (Using a traffic light response)
Indicating progress or not, preferences, demands etc., to accelerate UN Agenda 2030. A traffic light system for policy coherence for UN Agenda 2030 17 SDG’s and the 169 Targets
Resolution as to UN Agenda 2030-Transforming our World. Each Government sets its own targets guided by these global goals.
Benchmarking of the UN Agenda 2030 SDG’s identify qualitive intersections between the AHI Indicators and the SDG Indicators,
AHI INDICATORS -‘Asset Health Indicators’. January 2011 the World Economic Forum . It’s complex. A measurement of a condition of an asset.

The interactions are coloured based on a traffic light system. (Assessment System). Each are assigned a score between zero and three. Zero = Red, 1 = Orange, 2 = yellow (amber) and Green = 3.
In January 2011 the World Economic Forum reported the emergence of a ’New Asset Class’. Data collected on who we are, who we know, where we are, where we have been and where we plan to go.
Mining and analysing this data thus giving the ability to understand, predict where humans focus their attention and activity at the individual, group, country, global level.
This generating a new wave opportunity for economic, societal creation.
The WEF report documents the types and value of personal data collected as being vast. Profiles, demographic data, medical records, bank accounts, employment data, including our likes and dislikes and purchase history.

Our web searches and sites visited. Our tweets, emails, phone calls, photo’s, video’s as well as the coordinates of our real world locations. The list is vast and extremely variable and continues to grow.

Corporations, large companies, businesses use this data to support service and delivery of their business for their investors that can be monetised. Governments employ personal data to provide critical public services more effectively.
Researchers accelerate the development of new drugs and treatment protocols using this emergence of Asset Class system, that will spur a host of new services and applications. This is called the new ‘Oil’ a valuable resource for the 21st century. (Equals online investors)
This is known as an emergence of a new asset class touching all aspects of society. It’s core, personal data represents post- industrial opportunity. Its unprecedented complexity, velocity and has global reach.

A communications infrastructure, a personal data opportunity that will emerge in a world, where nearly everyone and everything is connected in real time, as the global elite, the Multistakeholder Capitalist wealthy greedy corporations, Bigg Tech, Big Pharm and Bayer-Monsanto will emerge in a global Eco political system, post the destruction of the Free-market Economy
For individuals, populations this will require a new way of thinking, behaving, hence we have behaviour modification in our midst, controlling people into compliance, obedience.
Re-engineering your life from the old normal to the mew normal to reward the wealthiest, elitist, leftist, socialist, Marxist, communist, most power hungry in this world today.
Green Traffic Light for instance =is given between the intersection of UN Agenda 2030/SDG indication 1.4. access to basic services for households.
Amber could denote concepts measured by Asset Health for social trust in business and government. (A measurement accumulated by the personal data collected about individuals, groups etc.,)
The Traffic Light System is a benchmark based on comparison between Asset Health domains and indicators at to UN Agenda 2030 SDG’s, based on judgements..
In some cases, SDGs fit into more than one AHI domain, and so were allocated into more than one domain. More than one indicator, traffic light colour.
With the talk of banks introducing a cashless society, which is clearly on the books. The Consumers Commissioner March 2009 documented on the WEF Report “Personal data is the new ‘Oil’ of the internet and the new currency of the digital world”
The World Economic Forum document states “Indeed, rethinking the central importance of the individual is fundamental to the transformational nature of this opportunity, this will spur solutions and insights”

As personal data increasingly becomes a critical course of innovation and value, business boundaries are being redrawn. Profit and Personal Data for large Multistakeholder Capitalist Corporations and large businesses.

The WEF back in 2009 reported that tensions were rising about the misuse of data, general public were becoming uneasy ‘about what they know about us’. There are fundamental questions about privacy, property, global governance, human rights.
However the WEF states “we cannot just hit the pause button” and let these issues sort themselves. “Building this legal, cultural, technological and economic infrastructure enabling the development of this personal data eco-system is vitally important.”
“It is in this context that the World Economic Forum launched a project entitled “Rethinking Personal Data” in 2010.
The intent of this multiyear project is to bring together a diverse set of stakeholders – private companies, public sector representatives, end user privacy and rights groups, academics and topic experts.

The aim is to deepen the collective understanding of how a principled, collaborative and balanced personal data ecosystem can evolve.
NZ Parliament has introduced the ‘Digital Identity Trust Framework Bill 2021 a few days ago’, and introduced the ‘Traffic Lights Response’ which relates to UN Agenda 2030.
On the 13th June 2019, the UN and the WEF signed an official partnership agreement to accelerate UN Agenda 2030. The WEF takeover of the UN was strongly condemned as a Global Public-Private Governance of the World

FIAN INTERNATIONAL (For the right to food and nutrition) stated that hundreds of CSO’s reiterate condemnation of the partnership[ between the corporate world with the UN. They called on the UN Secretary General to end it.
The agreement grants transnational corporations preferential access to the UN System at the expense of UN Member States and public interest actors.
That this partnership undermines the mandate of the UN as well as its independence. “This WEF and UN agreement formalises an extremely disturbing corporate capture of the UN.
It moves the world dangerously towards a privatised, undemocratic global governance”. Corporate influence has been long wielded in the UN System, however under the terms of 2019 of the UN-WEF partnership, the UN will be permanently associated with transnational corporations.
In the long term it will allow the WEF to be advisors to a One World Governance. Corporations in the global industrial food chain alone destroy 75 billion tons of topsoil annually, are responsible for the loss of 7.5 million hectares of forests. Leaves 3.9 billion unfed malnourished people.
The WEF represents the interests of those who destroy the environment and abuse Human Rights and personal property rights.

In 2019, Ardern speaking at the WEF Davos Meeting stated “While the government’s plans to move away from traditional methods of measuring growth and development are in keeping with a global push for a more purposeful capitalism, new metrics may be difficult to quantify and could take years to refine.
2019 well a couple of years and we are there. 2021.Her National State of Happiness Report. ..UN Agenda 2030 14 out of 17 global development goals -Here we are living the ‘UN Global Strategy for Vaccines 2011-2019, Leave No-one Behind. Everyone, everywhere at every age. 2020-2030 The Decade of Vaccines. Forget the sheep enter the lions.
UN Agenda 2030, leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. Accelerate UN Agenda 2030 calculations. Traffic Light Response. And Ardern’s Zero Carbons Eco-politics.
Controlling, re-engineering the minds of everyone in the world. Ardern and her political cronies destroying, being traitors to all New Zealanders in favour of a Private-Public One World Governance.

That is destroying our country, as we all sit on the edge of a suicidal cliff, the edge of a precipice. THIS IS CONTROL, COMPLAINCE, SLAVERY, DICTATORSHIP, COMMUNISM. USING THE TRAFFIC LIGHT RESPONSE
https://www.fian.org/en/press-release/article/wef-takeover-of-un-strongly-condemned-2273
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ITTC_PersonalDataNewAsset_Report_2011.pdf
https://www.sdg16hub.org/system/files/2019-05/The-Role-of-Multi-Stakeholder-Partnerships-in-Implementing-the-2030-Agenda-1-1.pdf

Blog Mini Series on MSPs – 3