How the United Nations is quietly being turned into a public-private partnership

A new agreement with the World Economic Forum gives multinational corporations influence over matters of global governance.

Harris Gleckman

Anew corporate and government marriage quietly took place last week when the leadership of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to partner with each other. While this MOU is proudly displayed on the WEF website, it is nowhere to be found on the UN website. The only indication on the UN website of this important new development is a picture of the pen used to sign the agreement, and two pictures of the signing ceremony.

One reason for this difference is that the UN’s corporate-centered Global Compact has received a good deal of bad press. Now the new WEF-UN agreement creates a second special place for multinational corporations inside the UN. There is no similar institutional homes in the UN system for civil society, for academics, for religious leaders, or for youth. It is hard to imagine a national government signing a similar formal partnership with one of its business organizations.

At the same time, the UN is under pressure from Donald Trump who wants to deconstruct the whole multilateral system. For Trump, dismantling the international system built after World War II is a companion piece to his domestic effort at deconstructing the administrative state. For the Secretary-General of the UN, the pact with the WEF may well be his effort to find new power actors who can support the current system, which is now celebrating its 75th anniversary, in the face of Trump’s onslaught.

On the other side, the WEF recently received significant public criticism after giving Hungarian Prime Minister Orban and Brazilian President Bolsonaro a warm welcome at its 2019 Davos gathering. This marriage may be seen as a way for the WEF to re-establish itself as part of the global governance center.

The timing and managing of public perceptions are not the only interesting aspect of this arrangement. In 2009, the WEF published a 600 page report entitled the Global Redesign Initiative, which called for a new system of global governing, one in which the decisions of governments could be made secondary to multistakeholder led initiatives in which corporations would play a defining role. In a sense this WEF study recommended a sort of public-private United “Nations” – something that has now been formalized in this MOU. The agreement announces new multistakeholder partnerships to deliver public goods in the fields of education, women, financing, climate change, and health.

The rather detailed MOU includes forms of cross organizational engagement up and down the UN structure. The MOU contains commitments that the Secretary-General himself will be invited to deliver a keynote address at the WEF annual Davos gatherings. His senior staff and the heads of the UN programmes, funds, and agencies will also be invited to participate in regional level meetings hosted by the WEF. It also contains a promise that the UN’s individual country representatives will explore ways to work with WEF’s national Forum Hubs. Aware of the mutual importance of public legitimacy each institution can provide for the other, the MOU also contains an agreement to cross-publicize their joint activities.

Besides the institutional blessing of the United Nations, what does the WEF get from the MOU? The scope of each of the five fields for joint attention is narrowed down from the intergovernmentally negotiated and agreed set of goals to one with more in line with the business interests of WEF members. So under financing, the MOU calls only for ‘build[ing] a shared understanding of sustainable investing’ but not for reducing banking induced instabilities and tax avoidance.

Under climate change, it calls for ‘ …public commitments from the private sector to reach carbon neutrality by 2050’, not actions that result in carbon neutrality by 2030 . Under education, it re-defines the Sustainable Development education goal to ‘ensure inclusive and equitable quality education’ into one that focuses on education to meet the ‘rapidly changing world of work.’ The MOU explicitly restricts the WEF from making financial contributions to the UN, which might have ameliorated the economic impact of some of Trump’s threat to the budgets of the UN system. At the same time, it avoids any commitment to reduce global inequality, to make energy affordable, to hold multinational corporations accountable for human rights violations, or even to rein in the behavior of the WEF’s firms that act inconsistently to the re-defined goals set out in the agreement.

All this joint work might have some practical good if it were not for three crucial elements: firstly, the agreement circumvents the intergovernmental review process; secondly, the agreement elevates multistakeholderism as the solution to the problems with the current multilateral system; and thirdly the proposed multistakeholder partnerships are not governed by any formal democratic system. Were the Secretary-General convinced of the wisdom of a UN marriage with the WEF, he could have submitted the draft MOU for approval by the member states. Instead, the Secretary-General joined the WEF in declaring in effect that multistakeholder groups without any formal intergovernmental oversight are a better governance system than a one-country-one-vote system.

All multistakeholder governance groups are largely composed of a self-selected group of multinational corporations and those organizations and individuals that they want to work with. They work without any common internal rule book to protect the views of all who might be impacted by the group. Participation in multistakeholder group is a voluntary undertaking. The drop-in-drop-out arrangements are antithetical to the UN’s efforts for 75 years to build a stable secure global governance system with a clear understanding of obligations, responsibilities and liabilities.

What is surprising is that by accepting this marriage arrangement with the WEF, the Secretary-General of the UN is marginalizing the intergovernmental system in order to ‘save’ it.

Open Democracy 2nd July 2019

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/how-united-nations-quietly-being-turned-public-private-partnership/?source=in-article-related-story

...

UN Agenda’s 21/2030 Blog Posts View all Categories

SIT DOWN, STAND UP JABBED OR NOT- JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY, ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/300474227/covid19-omicron-variant-mostly-mild-so-far-says-cdc-chief

COVID 19: Omicron variant mostly mild says CDC Chief.

More than 40 people in the United States have been found to be infected with the Omicron variant so far, and more than three-quarters of them had been vaccinated, the chief of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention says.

In an interview with The Associated Press, CDC director Dr Rochelle Walensky

She said “the disease is mild” in almost all the cases seen so far, with reported symptoms being mainly cough, congestion and fatigue. One person was hospitalised, but no deaths have been reported, CDC officials said. (6th December 2021)

The Omicron variant was first identified in South Africa last month and has since been reported in 57 countries, according to the World Health Organisation

The first US case was reported on December 1. As of Wednesday afternoon, local time, the CDC had recorded 43 cases in 19 states. Most were young adults. About a third of those patients had travelled internationally.

More than three-quarters of those patients had been vaccinated, and a third had received boosters

The CDC is also trying to establish whether the Omicron variant causes milder – or more severe – illness than other coronavirus types. The finding that nearly all of the cases so far are mild may be a reflection that this first look at US Omicron cases captured mainly vaccinated people,

Another key question is whether it is better at evading vaccines or the immunity that people build from a bout with Covid-19

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/300474227/covid19-omicron-variant-mostly-mild-so-far-says-cdc-chief

Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb joins Pfizer Board. Who sits on the board of Pfizer? Does the former FDA commissioner work for Pfizer?

Gottlieb served as the 23rd Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2017 to 2019. Prior to serving as Commissioner, Dr. Gottlieb held several roles in the public and private sectors including serving as Managing Director, T.R. … Pfizer Director since 2019.

RUETERS REPORTED. Pfizer paid $35 millions to doctors over 6 months in 2009. Pfizer agrees to pay a record $2,3 billion fine, pleaded guilty to a criminal charge related to improper promotions of 13 of its medicines.

About $15.3 million, or some 44 percent of Pfizer’s reported payments over the last six months of 2009, went to about 250 research organizations for clinical trials that began after July 1, or for payments made between July 1 and December 31 for clinical studies.

Some 1,500 healthcare professionals were paid an average $5,000 each for expert advice, while 2,800 doctors were paid an average of $3,400 in speaking fees to lecture peers about Pfizer’s drugs, the company said. The most highly compensated doctor received about $150,000 during the period, Pfizer said

About $15.3 million, or some 44 percent of Pfizer’s reported payments over the last six months of 2009, went to about 250 research organizations for clinical trials that began after July 1, or for payments made between July 1 and December 31 for clinical studies.

Some 1,500 healthcare professionals were paid an average $5,000 each for expert advice, while 2,800 doctors were paid an average of $3,400 in speaking fees to lecture peers about Pfizer’s drugs, the company said. The most highly compensated doctor received about $150,000 during the period, Pfizer said.

...

A CUP OF COLD SICK- DISCRIMINATION, LEGAL FICTION AND SCARE TACTICS

Yes I can only liken the severe erosion of Human Rights in New Zealand as being like a cup of cold sick.

As parents continue to give consent for their children to be COVID19 jabbed I shudder to think, and I am horrified that they have done so when it is well documented on the New Zealand MEDSAFE website in their question and answer section as to the safety of the jabs.  MEDSAFE response is not Yes or No, but clinical trials are ongoing.

A simple explanation is that our children are the clinical trials, they are the human experiments, the participating  guineapigs.   Through  the ongoing continuing influence of the propaganda machine that’s been purchased by Ardern’s Government with its cherry picking and scare tactical misinformation they have raped the minds of millions, to making irrational thoughtless, careless decisions around not only their own health and wellbeing but their children’s.

As for the booster shots CDC have documented there are risks post booster jabs for COVID19.

Reported adverse events:-  MEDSAFE and CARM determine the ‘likelihood’, give their ‘opinion’ as to CCOVID19 Jab Adverse events (reactions).

Please note: Opinion is merely a judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact, and likelihood is a probability which does not necessarily mean a fact, a chance it may or may not happen.. not concise.

Investigations as to deaths post COVID19 are referred to the coroners office to be investigated, these investigations may or may not be successful.

The Ministry Of Health define ‘deceased’ cases of post COVID 19 deaths are classified as active cases at the time, however they add “some of these cases, the underlying cause of death may have been unrelated to COVID19”

It was reported in 2019 – 74% of the world mortality is caused by non-communicable diseases

In New Zealand Cancer, Heart disease are the biggest killers.

Under the veil of COVID 19 New Zealand Government are using this to promote future AI digital technology for Tele-health and also working from home. This is the World Economic Forum/UN AI Digital playbook that the New Zealand Government agreed to with the WEF in 2019, where New Zealand’s would be the playthings (guineapigs).

Isolation whether work or social can risk depression, anxiety helplessness and hopelessness especially when people are given no other alternative, consequently this can cause serious health issues such as strokes, heart attacks etc., For some they will resort to eating and more consumption of alcohol which may lead to obesity  and addiction. Suicides again will significantly increase due to these factors.

New Zealand appears to have policies in place for women’s health however I am personally concerned that men’s health under the political agenda is sadly neglected. As there is much published about women’s rights, I personally believe medical discrimination is evident, has biases against men.  Men’s overall health and wellbeing is a bone of contention that should get much more attention.

PLEASE GO TO THE SCAREY MONSTER IMAGE AND CLICK THE LINK TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO. THANK YOU…CAROL

...

GUILTY OF POLLUTION BUT GIVEN THE HIGHEST AWARD FOR PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development is funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Rockefeller  Foundation (Corporate Philanthropists)  This is a ‘CEO-led’ business coalition of over 200 businesses and partners. Managed by Corporations and the Elite.

In 1995 it became known for promoting the narrative of corporate social and economic sustainable business, pushing the concepts of the UN and the World Economic Forum of Multistakeholder Capitalist Corporations.

WBCSD’s 200 member companies include 13% chemicals, 9% automobile and parts, 6% construction, 5% oil and gas, 5% electricity, 5% forestry and paper and 3% pharmaceuticals and biotechnology with 46% of these businesses in Europe, 23% in North America, 14% Asia, 10% Japan and 3% or less in other parts of the world.

WBCSD membership include agrochemical giants BASF,Bayer,Corteva, Syngenta, Sumitomo Chemicalm Dupont, Dow, BP, Cargill, Chevron, Danone, Google, Kellogs, McKinsey & Co., Nestle, Nutrien, Pepsico, P & G, Ptt Global Chemical, Shell, Rabobank, Santander, Unilever, Walmart and Viterra.

Pfizer established in 1849 by Charles Pfizer and his cousin Charles Erhart is one of the largest global pharmaceutical companies. In 2003 Pfizer was included as a member of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) that provides resources to the worlds leading corporations, (Multistakeholder Capitalist Corporations) to promotion multistakeholder corporations worldwide.

Pfizer won the Crystal Faraday Award for its contribution towards the minimization of its environmental footprint. Pfizer has been recognized by UN/WEF – The World Business Council for Sustainable Development for promoting UN Agenda 2030 and its Global Development Goals.  14 of the 17 Global Development Goals (SDGs) include the UN Global Strategy of Vaccines introduced prior to the pandemic in 2019. As documented on the UN website ‘The Decade of Vaccines 2020-2030, Leave No-one Behind, everyone, everywhere at every age.

In  a Stuff News article referencing Helen Clark awarding India’s largest tobacco company the highest award given by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, for protecting the environment, this was definitely not a glowing report.

The is all about the bigger picture of ‘Build Back Better’. The strategy of global collective action to redesign society, economy for 0.01% of the worlds population. Multistakeholder Capitalist Corporations, Big Tech, Big Pharma etc.,

To Reset the economy, the New Zealand Sustainable Business Council is representative on the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. They document calling the global COVID19 Crisis ‘A Brief Window of Opportunity’.

Prior to the plandemic in 2019, the UN held several high powered meetings in New York the focus was on the failing UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals, the words used were “We must take this narrow window of opportunity, we must act now”

The Sustainable Business Council Report 2020 documents “We should not go back to the old normal, but shape a new normal’  Leader of the WHO also publicly announced “we must never go back to the old normal”

Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset. 13th June 2019 the WEF and UN agreed to an official partnership to accelerate a one script for all, UN Agenda 2030-Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age. 2020-2030 The Decade of Action.  Key Players UN Agencies and UN Nations country leaders collaborating with Multistakeholder Corporations, Big Pharma, Big Tech (NZ Business Sustainable Council – World Business Sustainable Council – UNFSS funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Rockefeller Foundation)

Yes, those that pollute the waterways, spread the chemicals are included as members of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

PLEASE CLICK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE, THIS WILL TAKE YOU TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO GIVING  FURTHER INFORMATION.  THANK YOU.

If you have not signed up to my website now I would appreciate it if you would.

...

DEHUMANIZING, DESENTIZING HUMAN LIFE ITSELF- ‘COVID-19’ TOTALITARIALISM

NZ Herald reported on 10th November 2021 that there were allegations that a Pfizer contractor had falsified data in a clinal study for COVID19 Vaccines.

MEDSAFE decided it would rather take the stance in believing Pfizer when they reported there was no wrong doing. Taking the same tact as Australia’s Therapeutic Administration (TGA). However the British Medical Journal had serious concerns and published an article of the allegations.

Evidently a former employee of Ventavia Research Group, a Texas based contractor to Pfizer was involved in phase three trials of the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine. The whistleblower provided the British Medical Journal with dozens of internal company documents, photo’s, audio recordings and emails and also emailed FDA on the 25th September 2020.

FDA never audited Ventavia after receiving the complaint and even issued the emergency authorization for the vaccine the following day. Pfizer Australia refused to comment on the British Medical Journal Report. The Australian TGA reported the Pfizer COVID19 Jab was highly safe and effective. They said that Australians should not be worried about the British Medical Journal Report.

It was alleged that serious symptoms/reactions to the COVID19 jabs should have been urgently followed up.  Others employed at Ventavia confirmed the whistleblowers complaint. And it was said that Ventavia was nervous about an expected federal audit of its vaccine trial, but it did not happen.

Since this time Ventavia have been hired by Pfizer wo work on four other clinical trials

that include children, young people and pregnant women and also boosters.

On a London based radio station….Dr Aseem Malhotra a British Cardiologist and Public Health campaigner said that the British Medical Journal Report was “Absolutely Shocking, and it should be major news”.

And still globally the rollout of these jabs continue, this is evil, inhumane, desensitizing and dehumanizes life itself.

Human Dignity lives within  the very fundamental core of Human Rights. Our Human Dignity is severely, seriously under attack. Human Dignity is your birth-right, your worth as a human being. your personal unique identity as a human being, your God given right to exist.

PLEASE CLICK IN THE IMAGE ABOVE WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO THE RUMBLE VIDEO REFERRING TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION.

PLEASE NOTE:  If you have not signed up to this website as yet, please could you do so now:
Click on the SIGN UP NOW button at the bottom of this page Thank You.   Carol Sakey

...