Irrespective of who owns the land over which the water flows, under common law and statute law, water is owned by no-one. There is absolutely no legal, moral or common sense justification for any Iwi/Māori to claim freshwater. The legal situation is that no-one owns water, no-one ever has. Reference was made to common law and the Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 and the Resource Management Act 1991. (Canterbury University Law lecturer David Round

Water was never regarded by the common law as a commodity. The courts held that a land owner had no right to the ownership of water which either flows through or percolates within the land. In this way the courts recognised water like air is not only vital to the survival of all species on the planet but is something in which humanity has no hand in creating. It therefore like air occupies a unique status in the eyes of common law, it cannot be owned by anybody. Irrespective of the law.

Some Iwi/Maori have continued to claim ownership of freshwater. But since successive govts and courts have consistently rejected their opportunist claims, they have now turned their attention to the ‘control’ of water. (Former Judge Anthony Willy) “Water was never regarded by common law as a commodity”. Former Law Lecturer, Judge Anthony Willy, agrees: “Water was never regarded by the common law as a commodity

The truth is that no form of constitutional govt of itself can guarantee our civil liberties, but the intersection of the Rule of Law as administered by the Courts and the democratic process offers the best protection known to history- the enablement of tribal groups to gain control of freshwater will therefore not only entrench separatism in NZ but it will undermine the Rule of Law. (Judge Anthony Willy) 

Under British common law, naturally flowing freshwater is not owned by anyone, but is treated as a public good. 

NZ Bill Of Rights (Private Property Rights) Section 11A, “Right to own property”, inserted by clause 4, states: “Everyone has the right to own property, whether alone or in association with others.” Section 11B, “Right not to be arbitrarily deprived of property”, inserted by clause 4, states: “No person is to be deprived of the use or enjoyment of that person’s . 

NZ Bill Of Rights has been traditionally contained in Common Law in ‘The Judges Rules 1912 now set in 23 (1)b of The NZ Bill Of Rights 1991.

Worrying implications for ‘property rights’ exists. Govt being forceful in pushing through the Three Waters Reform, essentially an attack on property rights, a dark day for democracy in New Zealand, and community groups, voices have certainly made their voices heard as to their opposition of this robbery of communities infrastructure assets. The govt has been extremely busy working with Iwi Freshwater Group, the water industry and local councils. The Govt is going ahead with what they describe as opportunities for Iwi in the Water Entities Act, which establishes  new water services from July 2024. Govt providing for Iwi interest, rights is particularly focussed on water service delivery. The Three Waters Reform Review 2017-2020 documents the processes, engagement Govt have had with Iwi in the Three Waters Reforms. The 2020-21 reports stated “There has been many workshops, gatherings up and down the country”. This process of engagement with Iwi with govt and industry is documented in the Three Water Reform Review 2017-2020 and the Three Water Reform Programme  2020-2021. There has been many workshops, gatherings up and down the country.  Scoop News reported 21^st Feb 2023 ‘Three Waters Judgement Accepts No Confiscation of Assets with NO Compensation. The Timaru, Waimakiri and Whangarei Council  asked the High Court for declarations on the ‘rights and interests’ that property ownerships entails. Justice Mallon responded  “I accept that Three Waters Reform involves a form of expropriation for which compensation could be given, but whether it is or not is up to Parliament”

It was confirmed that the government’s Three Waters plan, plans to take away water infrastructure paid for by communities, for the government to serve its own purpose. Claiming privately owned property against the wishes of the owners of those assets. However the decision for compensation to be paid to the asset holders is one to be made by Parliament. Judgement was declines specific declaration sought by the councils, highlighted that “there is no acknowledgement from the Government that this confiscation was taking place and that a deliberate decision was made not to compensate communities for confiscation”. Judge Mallon stated that the documents do not directly acknowledge that local councils will lose ownership that they presently hold, nor that councils ability to control the use of assets will be materially diluted through the WSE Governance Structure. Nor that local democratic accountability for the provision of Three Water services in local communities is essentially lost. However, it does not follow that the Govt, and in return Parliament is unaware of this. The proposals are directed to a new model for delivering Three Waters, a significant Three Waters infrastructure challenge, The govt has proposed a funding package but has deliberately decided that this is not intended to compensate local councils for the value of infrastructure assets, not communities”. Hence the govt can remove local democratic rights, they are not held accountable and have misled the public of NZ of the true ramifications of this legislation. Those Council members who sought the High Court hearing stated  “As owners of this critical infrastructure on behalf of our communities we are now demanding that any future changes to Three Waters policy setting respect these basic rights in property owning democracy. This is the govt deliberately undermining basic property rights. The NZ Bill Of Rights (Private Property). The purpose of this Bill is to provide for the protection of private property rights in NZ under the NZ Bill Of Rights Act 1991. The Property Rights System establishes and maintains the integrity of title to estates and interests in land in NZ.

This is the government seeking to undermine basic property rights. The NZ Bill Of Rights (Private Property) The purpose of this Bill is to provide for the protection of private property rights in New Zealand under the NZ Bill Of Rights Act. Property Rights system. This system establishes and maintains the integrity of title to estates and interests in land in New Zealand. Article written by Dr Muriel Newman NZ Centre for Political Research 24/1/2016. This is a policy think tank. Dr Newman has previously been a MP and a former Chamber Of Commerce President in Business and Education. The article made the following points. ‘Iwi Leaders and Govt had agreed on a deadline to sort out Maori/Iwi Interests in freshwater by Waitangi Day 2016. (Report RNZ 5/2/2015). National Party planned to introduce Maori/Iwi interests in freshwater. NZCPR campaigned against this. Govt accused them of misinformation.

Article Grey Power Magazine authored by Cabinet Minister & MP for Tauranga Simon Bridges “I have been approached by a number of constituents regarding the control, ownership of NZ’s freshwater. He said,” there appears to be some misinformation”, but he wanted to clarify the matter, saying the National govt has always clearly stated “no-one owns the water”. He added “However the govt is working with the Land and Water Forum, this includes stakeholders including Iwi to develop a common direction for freshwater management in NZ. Race based interests as to management, allocation of fresh water resources in NZ”. But Bridges ensured Grey Power readers there were no plans to give control or ownership of our country’s lakes and rivers to Iwi”. Irrespective of who owns the land over which the water flows, under common law and stature water is owned by no-one. There is absolutely no legal, moral or common sense justification for any Iwi/Maori to claim freshwater. The legal situation is that no-one owns water, no-one ever has. Reference was made to common law and the Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 and the Resource Management Act 1991. (Canterbury University Law lecturer David Round).

Water was never regarded by the common law as a commodity. The courts held that a land owner had no right to the ownership of water which either flows through or percolates within the land. In this way the courts recognised water like air is not only vital to the survival of all species on the planet but is something in which humanity has no hand in creating. It therefore like air occupies a unique status in the eyes of common law, it cannot be owned b y anybody. Irrespective of the law. Some Iwi/Maori have continued to claim ownership of freshwater. But since successive govts and courts have consistently rejected their opportunist claims, they have now turned their attention to the ‘control’ of water. (Former Judge Anthony Willy) “Water was never regarded by common law as a commodity”. Reference: Former Law Lecturer, Judge Anthony Willy, agrees: “Water was never regarded by the common law as a commodity”.

NZ Herald October 2016) During the Labour Govts 3^rd term in office, leaders of some of the country’s most powerful tribes sought Maori control of water. Labour Govt stated that “Water is not owned, but is controlled, managed by the Crown for ALL New Zealanders”. Tribes were under the impression that the Labour Govt were considering privatisation of water rights as part of a water management reform programme. The tribal leaders considered if such a property right was created, they had a claim to it under the Treaty since they had gained a lucrative $170 million fishing settlement, Fishing Quota created as a property right, many tribes received substantial settlement of quota fishing company shares and cash. They believed a water settlement would dwarf the fisheries settlement & with the Ministry for the Environment estimating the total value of fresh water to NZ is now worth almost $35 billion (2016). And Iwi demands continued, and Iwi voices that claimed they owned the water in NZ.

Nationals concession to tribal demands for freshwater was signalled during the partial privatisation of the State owned power companies in 2012. The Crowns Counsel stated that the power company sale would not precent the govt from recognising the rights and interests of Iwi in freshwater”, and even suggested the creation of new ‘economic rights over water’ in the form of a ‘levy or royalty”.  Emphasizing, recognising Maori/Iwi Rights may include decision making in relation to care, protection, use, access and allocation, and/or charges or rentals for water. All this information being evidential yet NZCPT was accused of misinformation.. “The rule of law means simply that we shall be governed solely by the law properly enacted after due process, not by arbitrary whim of any person or group. It is a point of due process ‘a the way in which laws come into being’. That the Rule of Laws intersects with democracy, which together are the guarantors of our civic rights. It is crucial and unbridgeable divide between the rule at whim of the despot and his or her cronies and rule by law that we imperil when we permit exceptions no matter how well intentioned. Such an exception sought by the minority of the population to corner rights to fresh water is a classic example of a derogation of the Rule of Law simply because it gives governance over a crucial public good to a small and unelected group to the detriment of the majority”.  The truth is that no form of constitutional govt of itself can guarantee our civil liberties, but the intersection of the Rule of Law as administered by the Courts and the democratic process offers the best protection known to history- the enablement of tribal groups to gain control of freshwater will therefore not only entrench separatism in NZ but it will undermine the Rule of Law. (Judge Anthony Willy)

References were made to -Gisborne Council had already established a joint resource consenting authority with Ngati Porou for control  of freshwater in their region. (prior to Oct 2016). Minister for the Environment Nick Smith was already committed to preferential access for Iwi in catchment based processes, stating he intended to influence councils by issuing requirement or guidelines to regional councils when choosing or implementing allocation approaches or reviews of existing allocations.  National caved in to Maori Council demands for rights to freshwater. On the verge of water rights in perpetuity to tribal interest, but required councils to involve local Iwi/Maori tribes in the management, allocation, control of fresh water in their regions (prior to 2016). There is no form of constitutional govt of itself can guarantee our civil liberties, but the intersection of the Rule of Law as administered by the Courts and the democratic process offers the best protection known to history- the enablement of tribal groups to gain control of freshwater will therefore not only entrench separatism in NZ but it will undermine the Rule of Law. (Judge Anthony Willy). Under British common law, naturally flowing freshwater is not owned by anyone, but is treated as a public good.

The NZ Bill Of Rights (Private Property Rights) Section 11A, “Right to own property”, inserted by clause 4, states: “Everyone has the right to own property, whether alone or in association with others.” Section 11B, “Right not to be arbitrarily deprived of property”, inserted by clause 4, states: “No person is to be deprived of the use or enjoyment of that person’s .  NZ Bill Of Rights is traditionally contained in Common Law ‘The Judges Rules 1912 now set in 23 (1)b of NZ Bill Of Rights. – NZ Bill Of Rights has been traditionally contained in Common Law in ‘The Judges Rules 1912 now set in 23 (1)b of The NZ Bill Of Rights 1991.

https://wakeupnz.org

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2302/S00114/three-waters-judgement-accepts-confiscation-of-assets-with-no-compensation.htm

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2204/S00151/worrying-implication-for-property-rights-as-government-forces-through-three-waters-reform.htm

https://www.dia.govt.nz/Three-Waters-Reform-Programme

https://www.environmentguide.org.nz/issues/freshwater/freshwater-management-framework/ownership-of-freshwater/

Article In Stuff Lifestyle Sunday Magazine Feb 19^th 2023 Tusiata Avia a Christchurch poet and writer has authored a book titled ‘The Savage Coloniser Book’, this books contents have been turned into show for  an upcoming Auckland Arts Festival (there is no bleeping our of censorship or the outrageous racial hatred Tusiata Avia how any person with fair skin. There is absolutely no censorship. The journalist of the Sunday Magazine writes  “Tusiata Avia cannot wait to make you feel uncomfortable

Tusiata Avia from Christchurch is a poet and writer who’s book entitled “The Savage Coloniser Book” has been turned into a show for the upcoming Auckland Arts Festival. (Explicit language warning: Profanities have not been bleeped out in this video, against Stuff’s usual protocols, to allow the poet to read her work without censorship.). Michelle Duff talks to Ockham winning poet Tusiata Avia as she speels out racism, fearlessness of growing up as a Pasifika in NZ. In the interview she said brown people in the audience would laugh at her and white people are uneasy. In her staged event for Auckland Arts Festival she describes the following set for her show “A carload of brown girls seek grisly revenge on Captain Cook. A guide shows how to navigate the room of white people. Saying  “cousins in Christchurch are uso’s in the so called ‘brown zone’. She does not apologise for her despising of so called white people saying “I think its good for white people to sit and squirm a bit. I mean we’re brown people squirming all the times  (I call this incitement to hatred and racial discrimination, that has been left to run wild. If it were vice versa then the police would go knocking on doors, there would be arrests.  The Government, police acceptance and promotion of Cultural Marxism’. She eludes to white people stepping outside their comfort zone, then “states she loves her white audience, as silent as they are”. She also refers to colonization and white settlers that perpetuated damage in the pacific in the past is still here right now, and her dislike of white people to the massacre 15 th March 2019 Christchurch Attack of one loan wolf from Australia, she then linked this as others have to ‘white supremacy’

However the truth comes out when the Royal Commission of Inquiry responds to 17 Questions by the community of New Zealand where the Royal Commission of Inquiry stated that “3 yrs prior to the attack and up to the date of the attack 15.3.2019 the Muslim community in Christchurch were seriously concerned about a Daesh attack (ISIS). Tusiata Avia wrote these words “The White Spirits rise up from the swamp, and many bad things happen. The White Spirits rise up from the swamp and kill those that kneel and pray” Saying “I think it’s good for white people to sit and squirm a bit. I mean, we’re [brown people] squirming all the time,” Avia says. She states publicly that “she does not care what people think, because she is writing for herself”.

The Sunday Magazine journalist states that ‘Avia is warm and funny, she represents the truth, the universal truth about colonisation, which was basically rape and pillage and massacre. Avia was raised in Christchurch to a Samoan father and Pakeha mother. Her mother was of Scottish and English ancestry. She says “I have colonisers roots” Actually saying this out loud refers to the 250^th Anniversary of James Cooks Arrival In New Zealand:-

Hey James, yeah you in that big Endeavour sailing the blue water like a big arsehole.  F—YOU,BITCH- James. I heard that some-one shoved a knife right into the gap between your white ribs at Kealakekua Bay. I am going there make a big Makahiki-luau cook a white pig, feed it to the dogs and  F—YOU UP, BITCH. Hey James, its us these days, we are driving around in SUVs looking for ya or white men like you who might be thieves or rapists or kidnappers, or murderers- yeah, or any of your descendants or any of your carnations – cos you know – ay bitch We’re gonna F..YOU UP. Tonight, James its me Lani, Danielle and a car full of brown girls we find you. You’ve got another woman in a headlock and I’ve got my fathers pig hunting knife in my fist and we are coming to get you.- sailing around in your ‘Resolution’- your ‘Friendship’- your ‘Discovery’ and you F—king ‘Freelove’.. Watch you ribs James, cos I am coming with Kalaniopu’u, Kanekapolei, Kana’ina, Keawe’opala, Kuka ‘ilimoko who is God and Nua’a who is the King with a knife. And then James, then we are gonna ‘F— You UP FOR GOOD BITCH’. Author Tusiata Avia. Sunday Magazine. Image if the tables were turned this would have been the main item before the House-House . The Maori Party would have made mince meat of it. The police would have raided your house. So why hasn’t the Race Relations Commission been onto this?

I have many hundred of people with Maori and Pacific Island blood never have I ever heard them speak like this. This is just plain evil.

International Socialist Aotearoa summer reading – The Best of 2016. 18^th December 2016 reported. We asked writers, activists and intellectuals to offer picks from their reading and watching this year for others over the summer. Refers to a new Tusiata Avia collection, moving, angry, dextrous work, has received all sorts of hype and richly deserved. “Wild Dogs Under My Skirt’ and ‘Bloodclot’. Further reference : A celebration of Aotearoa NZ’s LGBTQI writing talent poet Tusiata Avia asks what collection of molecules am. I and I think about queer kinship and how do I trace my ancestors?

https://samesamebutdifferent.co.nz › 2021/06 › si…  Poet Tusiata Avia asks what collection of molecules am I and think about queer kinship and how do I trase my ancestors?

https://nzpoetryshelf.com/tag/sugar-magnolia-wilson/

NZ Book Shelf  Tusiata Avia is an internationally acclaimed poet, performer and children’s author. She has published 4 collections of poetry, 3 children’s books and her play ‘

The Word Christchurch festival 2018 TUSIATA AVIA GUEST PROGAMMER. Described as Socialist Feminist Activist Poet Writer-Author. https://wordchristchurch.co.nz/content/uploads/2018/07/SPUB0000_WORD-2018_Festival-Programme_LR.pdf

Patrons ans supporters of this festival included Corporate Patrons. Supporting publishers- Auckland university Press, Awa Press, Allen & Unwin, Penguin, Victoria University Press. Partners: includes British Council. Harcourts, Kate Sylvester, LISTENER, Heartland, University of Canterbury. Christchurch City Council. And RATA Foundation and more  were Festival Partner Christchurch 2018. Major Funders were Christchurch City Council CREATIVE NZ and RATA Foundation. The 2023 Auckland Arts Festival Funders and Sponsor- Auckland Council, CREATIVE NZ . Major Funders are FOUNDATION NORTH, PUB CHARITY, FOUR WINDS, NZCT. Gold Sponsors are The NZ Herald and Auckland Live. Silver Sponsors COLENSO BBDO and Bronze Sponsors are Russel McVeagh, AA, Think Science, TPDD Corporation and FLITS. Corporate Patrons..MOJO, DELMAINE, RICKETMASTER, BDO , BECA and G H MUMM Champage

FUNDING PARTNERS..The LION Foundation, Asia NZ Foundation, Made In Scotland, K’ARTS. Australian High Commission NZ, Canada Down Under, Government , The Trusts Community Foundation Of Canada a;; supporting the appalling incitement promotion of hatred for anyone who does not have a brown skin. The language used and the discrimination NOT censored and published By Sunday Magazine Stuff NZ

LINKS:

https://www.aaf.co.nz/support-us/sponsors

https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/sunday-magazine/131236724/tusiata-avia-cant-wait-to-make-you-uncomfortable?fbclid=IwAR2KFxpokBZCbAiVqEvshicuCmwSwatAgyh5B8jwJjRSMi_vXPYK7T8jRvQ

https://iso.org.nz/2016/12/18/socialist-summer-reading-the-best-of-2016/

. https://wordchristchurch.co.nz/content/uploads/2018/07/SPUB0000_WORD-2018_Festival-Programme_LR.pdf

https://nzpoetryshelf.com/tag/sugar-magnolia-wilson/

https://samesamebutdifferent.co.nz › 2021/06

The Decade of Water Action 2019-2030. UN Assembly gathering- 23-24^th March 2023. Attendee’s are world leaders, private sectors, academia,  organizations, NGO’s, Philanthropists and others for the UN 2023 Water Conference.  Included planning discussions on ‘Inclusive Equitable Water worldwide to ‘Secure the Future for People and Planet. .and lots of profit for multistakeholderm. Corporate Capture. To accelerate UN Agenda 2030 SDGs. A global political agenda to incorporate Smart policies into the global governance agenda and that of UN Member States Domestic policies. The natural resource of water has become a global commodity to be bought and sold on Wall Street. Implementing a new global information system. Used to guide plans, priorities prior to 2030. Every region in the world to have a warning system for natural disaster by 2027. The acceleration of SDG6 UN Agenda 2030. Every UN Member State to fast track climate action. Guterres said “Its desperate for actions to be taken by UN Member States. States with each other and their own citizens”. He stated that “Climate Action is moral, festering climate injustice feeds division, threatens to paralyze UN Global Climate Action Plan” 29/3/2023. That every UN Member State to appoint a ‘Special Envoy’ on water. Referring to a Global Water Social Policy. Global water is essential, effective for use in Global Politics.

Referring to – spaces, nations, states, mega cities, agriculture, regions, water sheds (river basins), local community, indigenous, technical criteria, infrastructure, economies and GUESSWORK. Global politics that criss cross State Sovereignty. Intersections of space and politics anchor these together, and embedded all  of this is Global Water Governance a massive collaboration of Global politics through hybrid networks of  a philosophy of Authoritarianism. Critiqued to the SDGs through integrated water resource management (IWRM). IWRM reached its heights in the 1990’s, then waned . Was redeployed to govern environmental change- risk- security (influence). The UN Response to Global environmental change and economic crisis. International Water Resource Management (UN/WEF). International organizations shaping global water policy, influencing global discourses. Water- Global Social Policy= Social Risks to too many other domains that link environmental, economic, political, all connected

Revisiting history -Huxley 1935-1943 his focus on eugenics and UN Educational Scientific Cultural Org., (UNESCO) Introduced the TVA model of integrating water control and social policy across education and health, rural development. In 1936 The Flood Control Act was introduced in the US. References made  to water contests and conflicts. “water is what you make it, can be many things” Global Water Politics a Global Governance shift to address undercurrents hence a natural resource (water) became a global political construct. Hence projects advantages to global industry, agribusiness, trade finance shaping  Global Water Policy launched by UNESCO International Hydrologic, spatial rates for States, a spatial control, the so called moral ordering of water  Into every  UN Nation state.(State projects)

Control over nature internationally was constituted in19^th century debates over civilization and progress stemmed from ‘International Danube’ Commission established in 1856 which especially occupied Russia’s lack of territorial control over the River Danube. The dominance of water with political control with the right tools that engineered water control. The control of nature, the spatializing of international agreements to engineer the control of water ‘Transnational Water Engineering Act Globally’. Post World War 2 the American model of TVA was exported to dozens of countries as the quintessential model of International Development promoted by UN Agencies including UNESCO

1971 The collaboration of Global Water politics- social, economic shifts and massive transformations.  International Water Resources Association (IWRA) First world water congress in Chicago 1973 The International Water Journal 1975 forging global water policy through meetings and journals. The critiquing people lacking water. 1977 Un conference ‘Water Partnerships’ UNESCO, HABITAT and World Bank (Global Water Governance). Water mapped out to human needs through the World Bank- water scarcity- water control- corporations and water-

1977 Integrated Water Global Politics approach to water. UNESCO-International Meteorological Org., space and politics, hence international collaborations at a global level acted out locally in UN Member States. (planting local roots)

1977 The shift from International policies to Global Politics this included the Mar del Plata, Argentina 1977. The  Integrated Water Global Politics approach to water. UNESCO-International Meteorological Org., space and politics, hence international collaborations at a global level acted out locally in UN Member States. ( the planting local roots)

1978 The Global Social Policy Water -Rational planning of water. 1999 UNESCO Earths Water Book of  statistical evaluability as the basis of decision making as to water., The spreading of this and rehearsing the information multiple times. Earths Water Atlas.’ UNESO

1980’s A widespread adopting of neo-liberal policies around water scarcity  interpreted by the world bank that required forming water pricing to enhance conservation, Neo liberal policies were applied to structural adjustments supplied by the World Bank and other privatization parties.

1987 Commission of the Environment and Development World Report ‘Our Common Future’ known as the Brundtland Report on Sustainable Development. UN gatherings with academia, heads of govts, scientists happed every three years, neo-liberalism established the global network of water with the World Bank or the UN Environment Programe UNEP. Commission of the Environment and Development World Report ‘Our Common Future’ known as the Brundtland Report on Sustainable Development

1991 Our Common Future received global attention as perceived as insufficient attention to the water issue, this was an opportunity to put water on the SDG agenda.

The Dublin UN Gathering  “It has economic value, competing uses, to be recognized as an economic good’ (DUBLIN (UN) Statement 1992). The Global Sustainability Agenda – Conflict and Contest. World Bank, UNESCO, IWRM, SDG to promote Multistakeholder Corporatization.

1994 Political influence for global economic environmental policy journal ‘Water Policy’ establishing credibility as multistakerholderism to convene World Water Forums. The editor of the journal Jerome Deli Priscoli claimed that “” the integration of water sector cross from a universal human longing to return to the comfort of the womb”

1996 Global Water Partnership- World Bank – knowledge broker- social- economic political global governance goals.  IWRM 3,000 partner organizations in 183 countries.(sustainable Water Management Services)

1997 the transnational power relationships and water conflict management. UN Water Courses Convention to codify existing norms.. global wate policy and the World Bank collaboration.

2003 Govts align water with sustainable millennium goals at the same time changes to land cover, World Economic Forum established an independent assessor of progress of programs towards the UN M DGs in 2004 when the Global Risks Report was published.

2009 WEF meeting UN Secretary General Ki Moon asked WEF to influence, establish water insecurity, structural risks, water energy- food nexus integrating various multiple policy domains hence global multistakeholderism

2008 Corporate Capture including influencing, collaborating with . financial tools for global water policy, debt for water swaps and microcredit schemes. The adopted language ..2008 Financial Crisis to bridge environmental and economic risks, new networks for the WEF.

2010 UN passed Human Rights to water and Sanitation enhancing market forces globally, market mechanisms. Engaging corporations eg Pepsi Co, Coca Cola, Nestle, new working groups to action Agenda SDGs collaborating with the World Bank under the quintessential book of data relating to water, The Water … Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO

Many UN gatherings with academia, heads of govts, scientists happed every three years, neo-liberalism established the global network of water with the World Bank or the UN Environment Programme UNEP. Namely ‘WATER FOR ALL’. A global governance portfolio was created – a high level panel on water, political development to deliver UN Agenda to steer and drive UN Member States.. The introduction, global expansion of the  language of  critical thresholds, shocks, tipping points , complex systems were interconnected with economies and environments. The mirroring of global, regional, national discourse of SDG integration and neo liberal policies, programs – people, planet for those global elite few wealthy profits. The earth system amplified into multiple critical roles, , the Global governance of water  political, social and economic global forces. The massive dominating power of the Global Governance, multi-layered collaborations emerging into what is called Water Scarcity, water security, water resilience what about Water on the Stock market, and water and land grabs. Mass corruption, robbery of natural resources under the International Resource Water Management

Control water, control everything,  control everyone.  Global Water Governance and neo liberal environmentalism. The massive power of the World Bank and the collaboration of philanthropists, NGO’s UN and WEF Multistakeholder capitalism. Transnational policies, transnational corporations.  Water is central to the Global Governance. National the public- private partnership with Iwi Water Group and collaborating Iwi/Hapu. And the global strategic partnership of the UN and WEF just to make it official they are actually in an official partnership, and it hasn’t just happened these last couple of years.  Unelected bodies advocating the way people live their lives in NZ. International organizations shaping global water policy, influencing global discourses. Water- Global Social Policy= Social Risks to too many other domains that link environmental, economic, political, all connected

Revisiting history -Huxley 1935-1943 his focus on eugenics and Un Educational Scientific Cultural Org., (UNESCO) Introduced the TVA model of integrating water control and social policy across education and health, rural development. In 1936 The Flood Control Act was introduced in the US.

There were references to water contests and conflicts. “water is what you make it, can be many things” Global Water Politics a Global Governance shift to address undercurrents hence a natural resource (water) became a global political construct. Accelerating SDG6. Into every  UN Nation state. Transnational power relationships an water conflict management of 1997 and the UN Water Courses Convention to codify existing norms.. global wate policy and the World Bank collaboration. Hence projects advantages to global industry, agribusiness, trade finance shaping  Global Water Policy launched by UNESCO International Hydrologic, spatial rates for States, a spatial control, the so called moral ordering of water  Into every  UN Nation state.(State projects). Control over nature internationally constituted on the 19th century debates over civilization and progress stemmed from ‘International Danube’ Commission established in 1856 which especially occupied Russia’s lack of territorial control over the River Danube. The dominance of water with political control with the right tools that engineered water control. The control of nature, the spatializing of international agreements to engineer the control of water ‘Transnational Water Engineering Act Globally’. Post World War 2. A widespread adopting of neo-liberal policies around water scarcity that was intepreeted by the world bank that required forming water pricing to enhance conservation, Neo liberal policies were applied to structural adjustments in the 1980s supplied by the World Bank and other privatization parties.

‘WATER FOR ALL’. A global governance portfolio was created – a high level panel on water, political development to deliver UN Agenda to steer and drive UN Member States.. The language of  critical thresholds, shocks, tipping points , complex systems were interconnected with economies and environments. The mirroring of global, regional, national discourse of SDG integration and neo liberal policies, programs – people, planet for those global elite few wealthy profits. The earth system amplified into multiple critical roles, , the Global governance of water  political, social and economic global forces. The  dominate of  a Global Governance one collaboration after another and multi-layered collaborations emerging into what is called Water Scarcity, water security, water resilience what about Water on the Stock market, and water and land grabs.

Control water, control everything,  control everyone.  Global Water Governance and neo liberal environmentalism. The massive power of the World Bank and the collaboration of philanthropists, NGO’s UN and WEF Multistakeholder capitalism. Transnational policies, transnational corporations. Water is central to the Global Governance. National the public- private partnership with Iwi Water Group and collaborating Iwi/Hapu. Global water Governance taking growing local roots.  And the global strategic partnership of the UN and WEF just to make it official they are actually in an official partnership, and it hasn’t just happened these last couple of years.  Unelected bodies advocating the way people live their lives in NZ. International organizations shaping global water policy, influencing global discourses. Water- Global Social Policy= Social Risks to too many other domains that link environmental, economic, political, all connected

here were references to water contests and conflicts. “water is what you make it, can be many things” Global Water Politics a Global Governance shift to address undercurrents hence a natural resource (water) became a global political construct. Accelerating SDG6. Into every  UN Nation state. Transnational power relationships an water conflict management of 1997 and the UN Water Courses Convention to codify existing norms.. global wate policy and the World Bank collaboration. Hence projects advantages to global industry, agribusiness, trade finance shaping  Global Water Policy launched by UNESCO International Hydrologic, spatial rates for States, a spatial control, the so called moral ordering of water  Into every  UN Nation state.(State projects)

NZ replacement of the Resource Management Act 1991. Spatial control, public- private partnerships (Co Governance ). The language of  critical thresholds, shocks, tipping points , complex systems were interconnected with economies and environments. The mirroring of global, regional, national discourse of SDG integration and neo liberal policies, programs – people, planet for those global elite few wealthy profits. The earth system amplified into multiple critical roles, , the Global governance of water  political, social and economic global forces. The  dominate of  a Global Governance one collaboration after another and multi-layered collaborations emerging into what is called Water Scarcity, water security, water resilience what about Water on the Stock market, and water and land grabs.

Control water, control everything,  control everyone.  Global Water Governance and neo liberal environmentalism. The massive power of the World Bank and the collaboration of philanthropists, NGO’s UN and WEF. NO WATER-NO LIFE. EF Multistakeholder capitalism. Transnational policies, transnational corporations. Water is central to the Global Governance. National the public- private partnership with Iwi Water Group and collaborating Iwi/Hapu. And the global strategic partnership of the UN and WEF just to make it official they are actually in an official partnership, and it hasn’t just happened these last couple of years.  Unelected bodies advocating the way people live their lives in NZ. The capitalization of crisis, crisis after crisis. And now we have the planning of a Global Hate Speech International Law. Is this Hopkins special announcement appoint Ardern to a Special Envoy with Macron to converse and collaborate with the UN and world leaders on the Incitement to Hate Speech. Expose Global Governance Plan incitement to intolerance.

WATER= FOOD = LAND= CRISIS – SHRILL WARNING ALARMS GLOBALLY IN EVERY UN NATION STATE BY 2027.(THE IMAGES, SOUNDS,  WORDS SPOKEN & UNSPOKEN. WARNINGS OF MULTIPLE CRISIS EVENTS. UN ANNOUNCE “ WE ARE DESPERATE FOR STRONGER, BOLDER CLIMATE ACTION, OUR GLOBAL PLAN OF MULTILAYERED GLOBAL GOVERNANCE. IS THREATENED. GLOBAL WATER GOVERNANCE- ITS IS THE CORE OF THE UN/WEF PLAN

LINK:

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ENV_SustainableConsumption_Book_2013.pdf